The SUPAC guidelines provide recommendations for post-approval changes to NDAs and ANDAs, including changes to components, manufacturing processes, batch size, and manufacturing sites. The guidelines classify changes as minor (Level 1), moderate (Level 2), or major (Level 3) based on their potential effect on product quality and performance. Level 1 changes require chemistry and dissolution documentation, while Level 2 changes may also require in vivo bioequivalence testing or stability testing. Level 3 changes always require bioequivalence testing and prior approval before implementation. The guidelines aim to streamline regulatory processes for industry while ensuring safety and effectiveness.
This document discusses post-approval changes to drug products, including changes to batch size, manufacturing sites and equipment, and components/composition. It provides guidance on categorizing the level of changes (Level 1-3) and the associated testing and documentation required for submission to regulatory agencies. Level 1 changes have minimal impact while Level 3 changes are more significant and may require bioequivalence studies. The focus is on allowing certain post-approval changes with limited testing to facilitate drug product improvements and manufacturing changes.
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)bdvfgbdhg
The document discusses guidelines for post-approval changes to drug products, including changes to batch size, manufacturing sites and equipment, and composition. It outlines 3 levels of changes - minor, moderate, and major - and provides recommendations for documentation and regulatory filings required for each level of change. Major changes, such as a new manufacturing site or changes in the amount of active ingredients, require more extensive documentation including stability testing and possibly bioequivalence studies.
(SUPAC- Part 2) (SCALE UP AND POST APPROVAL CHANGES)kavita bahmani
This document provides information on scale-up and post-approval changes for batch size and manufacturing processes. It defines two levels for changes in batch size - level 1 as a scale up of up to 10 times the pilot/bio-batch size, and level 2 as greater than 10 times. For level 1 changes, notification in an annual report is sufficient, while level 2 requires submission of additional stability data. Two levels are also defined for equipment changes - level 1 as alternative equipment of the same design, and level 2 as a different design. Level 1 equipment changes require stability data submission in an annual report, while level 2 requires submission of additional dissolution and stability data in a prior approval supplement.
SUPAC, BACPAC, Post Marketing SurveillanceMANIKANDAN V
This document discusses various guidelines related to product development and technology transfer in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers SUPAC, BACPAC, and post-marketing surveillance. SUPAC provides guidance for scale-up and post-approval changes, categorizing changes into different levels based on their potential impact. BACPAC guidance addresses post-approval changes for bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients. Post-marketing surveillance involves monitoring adverse drug events after approval to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness.
ATUL CHAUDHARY (STUDENTS)
DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS
ISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, GHALKALAN, MOGA , PUNJAB
THIS SLIDE IS THE BEST SLIDE FOR PREPARING THE TOPIC SUPAC OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS SUBJECT
SLIDE ARE SPECIALLY DESIGN FOR MASTER STUDENTS AS WELL AS GRADUATION STUDENTS
Chap 1_ SUPAC mpharm quality assurance semester 2christinajohn24
This document discusses the SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidance which provides recommendations for sponsors making changes to approved drug applications. It defines three levels of changes - minor, moderate, and major - and recommends tests for each level. Minor changes require limited testing while major changes require more extensive testing such as bioequivalence studies. The guidance provides specific recommendations for changes to components/composition, manufacturing site, batch size (scale up/down), and manufacturing process/equipment. It aims to help sponsors anticipate and evaluate the impact of changes to ensure drug quality is maintained.
This document provides information about SUPAC (Scale-Up and Post approval Changes), including:
- SUPAC provides guidance for changes made during post-approval manufacturing of oral solid dosage forms.
- Changes are categorized as minor, moderate, or major depending on their level of impact on quality and performance.
- Site changes involve relocating manufacturing to a new facility, and are classified as Level 1, 2, or 3 depending on the distance between facilities and whether equipment and personnel remain the same. Level 3 changes involve moving to an entirely new campus.
The SUPAC guidelines provide recommendations for post-approval changes to NDAs and ANDAs, including changes to components, manufacturing processes, batch size, and manufacturing sites. The guidelines classify changes as minor (Level 1), moderate (Level 2), or major (Level 3) based on their potential effect on product quality and performance. Level 1 changes require chemistry and dissolution documentation, while Level 2 changes may also require in vivo bioequivalence testing or stability testing. Level 3 changes always require bioequivalence testing and prior approval before implementation. The guidelines aim to streamline regulatory processes for industry while ensuring safety and effectiveness.
This document discusses post-approval changes to drug products, including changes to batch size, manufacturing sites and equipment, and components/composition. It provides guidance on categorizing the level of changes (Level 1-3) and the associated testing and documentation required for submission to regulatory agencies. Level 1 changes have minimal impact while Level 3 changes are more significant and may require bioequivalence studies. The focus is on allowing certain post-approval changes with limited testing to facilitate drug product improvements and manufacturing changes.
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)bdvfgbdhg
The document discusses guidelines for post-approval changes to drug products, including changes to batch size, manufacturing sites and equipment, and composition. It outlines 3 levels of changes - minor, moderate, and major - and provides recommendations for documentation and regulatory filings required for each level of change. Major changes, such as a new manufacturing site or changes in the amount of active ingredients, require more extensive documentation including stability testing and possibly bioequivalence studies.
(SUPAC- Part 2) (SCALE UP AND POST APPROVAL CHANGES)kavita bahmani
This document provides information on scale-up and post-approval changes for batch size and manufacturing processes. It defines two levels for changes in batch size - level 1 as a scale up of up to 10 times the pilot/bio-batch size, and level 2 as greater than 10 times. For level 1 changes, notification in an annual report is sufficient, while level 2 requires submission of additional stability data. Two levels are also defined for equipment changes - level 1 as alternative equipment of the same design, and level 2 as a different design. Level 1 equipment changes require stability data submission in an annual report, while level 2 requires submission of additional dissolution and stability data in a prior approval supplement.
SUPAC, BACPAC, Post Marketing SurveillanceMANIKANDAN V
This document discusses various guidelines related to product development and technology transfer in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers SUPAC, BACPAC, and post-marketing surveillance. SUPAC provides guidance for scale-up and post-approval changes, categorizing changes into different levels based on their potential impact. BACPAC guidance addresses post-approval changes for bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients. Post-marketing surveillance involves monitoring adverse drug events after approval to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness.
ATUL CHAUDHARY (STUDENTS)
DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS
ISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, GHALKALAN, MOGA , PUNJAB
THIS SLIDE IS THE BEST SLIDE FOR PREPARING THE TOPIC SUPAC OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS SUBJECT
SLIDE ARE SPECIALLY DESIGN FOR MASTER STUDENTS AS WELL AS GRADUATION STUDENTS
Chap 1_ SUPAC mpharm quality assurance semester 2christinajohn24
This document discusses the SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidance which provides recommendations for sponsors making changes to approved drug applications. It defines three levels of changes - minor, moderate, and major - and recommends tests for each level. Minor changes require limited testing while major changes require more extensive testing such as bioequivalence studies. The guidance provides specific recommendations for changes to components/composition, manufacturing site, batch size (scale up/down), and manufacturing process/equipment. It aims to help sponsors anticipate and evaluate the impact of changes to ensure drug quality is maintained.
This document provides information about SUPAC (Scale-Up and Post approval Changes), including:
- SUPAC provides guidance for changes made during post-approval manufacturing of oral solid dosage forms.
- Changes are categorized as minor, moderate, or major depending on their level of impact on quality and performance.
- Site changes involve relocating manufacturing to a new facility, and are classified as Level 1, 2, or 3 depending on the distance between facilities and whether equipment and personnel remain the same. Level 3 changes involve moving to an entirely new campus.
This document provides guidelines for post-approval changes to modified release solid oral dosage forms. It outlines 3 levels of changes based on their potential to affect drug release and product performance. Level I changes have minimal effect and only require documentation in annual reports. Level II changes may impact drug release and dissolution testing is required, along with submissions of change supplements. Level III changes are expected to significantly affect drug release and require bioequivalence studies and prior approval supplements.
The document discusses Scale-Up and Post Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines established by the FDA. It defines SUPAC as changes made to the manufacturing process, equipment, batch size, or site after a drug has received FDA approval. The guidelines establish three levels of changes with varying documentation and reporting requirements depending on the level of change. Level 1 changes have the least requirements while level 3 changes require extensive testing data and may need pre-approval before implementation.
This document summarizes guidance on scale up and post-approval changes for pharmaceutical products. It outlines 3 levels for various changes based on their potential impact. Level 1 changes are unlikely to impact quality or performance. Level 2 changes may significantly impact quality or performance. Level 3 changes require full bioequivalence testing. The guidance covers changes to components, manufacturing site, batch size, equipment, and processes. Documentation requirements increase based on the level of change, ranging from chemistry testing to full bioequivalence studies.
This document summarizes guidance on scale up and post-approval changes for pharmaceutical products. It outlines 3 levels for various changes based on their potential impact. Level 1 changes are unlikely to impact quality or performance. Level 2 changes may significantly impact quality or performance. Level 3 changes require full bioequivalence testing. The guidance covers changes to components, manufacturing site, batch size, equipment, and processes. Documentation requirements increase based on the level of change from annual reports to chemistry testing and bioequivalence studies.
This document discusses granulation processes and quality management in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers topics like cGMP, SUPAC guidelines for post-approval changes, validation of granulation equipment and processes, and questionnaires for auditing granulation. The key points are that granulation is a critical manufacturing step that must be validated; SUPAC provides guidance on composition, batch size, site and equipment changes; and validation involves qualifying equipment and demonstrating consistent product quality through processes.
This document provides guidelines for scale-up and post-approval changes (SUPAC) as outlined by the FDA. It discusses SUPAC documents, levels of changes, and recommendations for changes to components and composition, manufacturing site, batch size, and manufacturing process and equipment. The guidelines provide recommendations for submitting documentation to the FDA for level 1, 2, and 3 changes to ensure quality and performance of drug products after approval. It notes some limitations of the SUPAC guidelines, including that they have not been updated since 1995/1997 and do not cover all potential changes.
This document discusses SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidelines and post-marketing surveillance. It provides details on SUPAC guidelines for immediate release solid oral dosage forms, including definitions of level 1, 2, and 3 changes for components/composition, site changes, batch size changes, and manufacturing process/equipment changes. It also discusses post-marketing surveillance, including the importance of monitoring drug safety after approval and examples of adverse events discovered only after drugs entered the market like Practolol and Thalidomide.
The document is a presentation on post-approval changes to bulk active chemicals. It discusses FDA guidance called BACPAC (Bulk Active Chemicals & Post Approval Changes) which provides recommendations for post-approval changes to drug substance synthesis, including site, scale and equipment changes as well as specification and manufacturing process changes. The guidance covers assessing equivalence after changes and determining the appropriate reporting category based on the potential effects of changes.
This document provides an overview of SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidelines. It discusses that SUPAC refers to the process of increasing production batch sizes (scale up) and post-approval changes to approved drug products. The history and background of SUPAC guidelines are explained, including how FDAMA legislation in 1997 established categories for reporting manufacturing changes. The document outlines the different levels of changes according to SUPAC (minor, moderate, major) and describes the benefits of SUPAC guidelines in providing regulatory flexibility for industries to make certain small changes without full data resubmissions.
Post Marketing Surveillance, Variations & Vigilance in Pharmaceuticals - Part 2Obaid Ali / Roohi B. Obaid
This document discusses various post-marketing changes to pharmaceutical products that can be documented in an annual report rather than requiring submission of a supplement for approval. It provides examples of minor changes that would have low risk to product quality, such as adjustments to manufacturing processes, equipment, sites, specifications, labeling, and container closure systems. The changes outlined have minimal potential for adverse effects and are consistent with guidance from regulatory agencies.
IN VIVO AND SCALE-UP PROCESS APPROVAL CHANGES.pptxPawanDhamala1
The document discusses in vivo and scale-up process approval changes. It defines in vivo as experiments done on living organisms. SUPAC guidelines provide regulatory guidance for scale-up batches and post-approval changes. Changes are categorized as minor, major, or moderate. Level 1 changes have minimal impact while Level 3 changes likely impact quality. Requirements include chemistry documentation, dissolution testing, and bioequivalence studies depending on the level of change. Site, batch size, equipment, and process changes are also discussed along with associated testing requirements.
1) A systematic change control process is important in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure that any changes made to products or systems are properly documented, reviewed, and approved. Major changes may require regulatory approval while minor changes do not.
2) The procedure involves an initiating department submitting a change request form detailing the proposed change and its justification. Changes are classified as major or minor. Major changes such as formulation or manufacturing process changes require approval from quality assurance.
3) A structured change control system provides benefits like consistent management of changes, maintaining documentation and history of changes, and demonstrating regulatory compliance.
Introduction to Scale up and post approval changes.
SUPAC Guidelines :
1.In component and composition
2.The site of manufacture
3.The scale up batch of manufacture
4.The manufacturing( equipment and process)
The document provides guidance on post-approval changes to immediate release solid oral dosage forms. It defines three levels (I, II, III) of changes based on their potential impact. Level I changes are minor, Level II are moderate, and Level III are major. It provides recommendations for chemistry, manufacturing, dissolution and bioequivalence testing for components/composition, site, batch size and manufacturing changes. Changes are supported by prior approval supplements, changes being effected supplements or annual reports with stability data as appropriate to the level of change.
The document discusses post-approval changes that can be made to approved NDAs and ANDAs. It describes four reporting categories for post-approval changes based on their potential impact: major changes requiring prior approval, moderate changes reported via a CBE-30 or CBE-0 supplement, minor changes reported annually. Examples are provided for different types of changes that fall under each reporting category. The levels of reporting ensure that manufacturers can make certain changes while providing appropriate notification to the FDA depending on the level of change.
This document provides guidance for classifying post-approval changes made to biological products as Level I, II, or III. Level I changes require a supplement submission and have a substantial effect on quality, safety or efficacy. Level II changes require notification and have a moderate effect. Level III changes are minor quality changes that do not require prior review but must be reported annually. The document describes examples of changes for drug substance, product, manufacturing, specifications, and stability and provides the recommended reporting category for each.
The document discusses change control management according to cGMP guidelines. It defines change control and why it is important to have a formal change control system to evaluate any changes that could affect product quality. It provides details on how to classify, document, review and approve changes, as well as testing and validation requirements. Specific guidance is given for process, equipment, raw material and analytical method changes.
(SUPAC- Part 3) (SCALE-UP AND POST APPROVAL CHANGES)kavita bahmani
This document summarizes the different levels of changes to the manufacturing process that require varying levels of documentation for supplemental approval. Level 1 changes are minor process changes within validated ranges that only require annual reporting. Level 2 changes are outside validated ranges and require additional stability testing and dissolution documentation. Level 3 changes altering the entire manufacturing process require the most extensive documentation, including chemistry reports, stability data from multiple batches, dissolution testing, and an in vivo bioequivalence study or correlation to prove equivalent performance between the original and changed product. The document also reviews the objectives, design considerations, and analysis of in vivo bioequivalence studies.
Quality-by-Design In Pharmaceutical DevelopmentPrabhjot kaur
Quality-by-Design In Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction, ICH Q8 guideline, Regulatory and industry views on QbD, Scientifically based QbD - examples of application. M. Pharmacy 2nd Semester (Computer aided drug delivery system)
This document provides guidelines for post-approval changes to modified release solid oral dosage forms. It outlines 3 levels of changes based on their potential to affect drug release and product performance. Level I changes have minimal effect and only require documentation in annual reports. Level II changes may impact drug release and dissolution testing is required, along with submissions of change supplements. Level III changes are expected to significantly affect drug release and require bioequivalence studies and prior approval supplements.
The document discusses Scale-Up and Post Approval Changes (SUPAC) guidelines established by the FDA. It defines SUPAC as changes made to the manufacturing process, equipment, batch size, or site after a drug has received FDA approval. The guidelines establish three levels of changes with varying documentation and reporting requirements depending on the level of change. Level 1 changes have the least requirements while level 3 changes require extensive testing data and may need pre-approval before implementation.
This document summarizes guidance on scale up and post-approval changes for pharmaceutical products. It outlines 3 levels for various changes based on their potential impact. Level 1 changes are unlikely to impact quality or performance. Level 2 changes may significantly impact quality or performance. Level 3 changes require full bioequivalence testing. The guidance covers changes to components, manufacturing site, batch size, equipment, and processes. Documentation requirements increase based on the level of change, ranging from chemistry testing to full bioequivalence studies.
This document summarizes guidance on scale up and post-approval changes for pharmaceutical products. It outlines 3 levels for various changes based on their potential impact. Level 1 changes are unlikely to impact quality or performance. Level 2 changes may significantly impact quality or performance. Level 3 changes require full bioequivalence testing. The guidance covers changes to components, manufacturing site, batch size, equipment, and processes. Documentation requirements increase based on the level of change from annual reports to chemistry testing and bioequivalence studies.
This document discusses granulation processes and quality management in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers topics like cGMP, SUPAC guidelines for post-approval changes, validation of granulation equipment and processes, and questionnaires for auditing granulation. The key points are that granulation is a critical manufacturing step that must be validated; SUPAC provides guidance on composition, batch size, site and equipment changes; and validation involves qualifying equipment and demonstrating consistent product quality through processes.
This document provides guidelines for scale-up and post-approval changes (SUPAC) as outlined by the FDA. It discusses SUPAC documents, levels of changes, and recommendations for changes to components and composition, manufacturing site, batch size, and manufacturing process and equipment. The guidelines provide recommendations for submitting documentation to the FDA for level 1, 2, and 3 changes to ensure quality and performance of drug products after approval. It notes some limitations of the SUPAC guidelines, including that they have not been updated since 1995/1997 and do not cover all potential changes.
This document discusses SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidelines and post-marketing surveillance. It provides details on SUPAC guidelines for immediate release solid oral dosage forms, including definitions of level 1, 2, and 3 changes for components/composition, site changes, batch size changes, and manufacturing process/equipment changes. It also discusses post-marketing surveillance, including the importance of monitoring drug safety after approval and examples of adverse events discovered only after drugs entered the market like Practolol and Thalidomide.
The document is a presentation on post-approval changes to bulk active chemicals. It discusses FDA guidance called BACPAC (Bulk Active Chemicals & Post Approval Changes) which provides recommendations for post-approval changes to drug substance synthesis, including site, scale and equipment changes as well as specification and manufacturing process changes. The guidance covers assessing equivalence after changes and determining the appropriate reporting category based on the potential effects of changes.
This document provides an overview of SUPAC (Scale Up and Post Approval Changes) guidelines. It discusses that SUPAC refers to the process of increasing production batch sizes (scale up) and post-approval changes to approved drug products. The history and background of SUPAC guidelines are explained, including how FDAMA legislation in 1997 established categories for reporting manufacturing changes. The document outlines the different levels of changes according to SUPAC (minor, moderate, major) and describes the benefits of SUPAC guidelines in providing regulatory flexibility for industries to make certain small changes without full data resubmissions.
Post Marketing Surveillance, Variations & Vigilance in Pharmaceuticals - Part 2Obaid Ali / Roohi B. Obaid
This document discusses various post-marketing changes to pharmaceutical products that can be documented in an annual report rather than requiring submission of a supplement for approval. It provides examples of minor changes that would have low risk to product quality, such as adjustments to manufacturing processes, equipment, sites, specifications, labeling, and container closure systems. The changes outlined have minimal potential for adverse effects and are consistent with guidance from regulatory agencies.
IN VIVO AND SCALE-UP PROCESS APPROVAL CHANGES.pptxPawanDhamala1
The document discusses in vivo and scale-up process approval changes. It defines in vivo as experiments done on living organisms. SUPAC guidelines provide regulatory guidance for scale-up batches and post-approval changes. Changes are categorized as minor, major, or moderate. Level 1 changes have minimal impact while Level 3 changes likely impact quality. Requirements include chemistry documentation, dissolution testing, and bioequivalence studies depending on the level of change. Site, batch size, equipment, and process changes are also discussed along with associated testing requirements.
1) A systematic change control process is important in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure that any changes made to products or systems are properly documented, reviewed, and approved. Major changes may require regulatory approval while minor changes do not.
2) The procedure involves an initiating department submitting a change request form detailing the proposed change and its justification. Changes are classified as major or minor. Major changes such as formulation or manufacturing process changes require approval from quality assurance.
3) A structured change control system provides benefits like consistent management of changes, maintaining documentation and history of changes, and demonstrating regulatory compliance.
Introduction to Scale up and post approval changes.
SUPAC Guidelines :
1.In component and composition
2.The site of manufacture
3.The scale up batch of manufacture
4.The manufacturing( equipment and process)
The document provides guidance on post-approval changes to immediate release solid oral dosage forms. It defines three levels (I, II, III) of changes based on their potential impact. Level I changes are minor, Level II are moderate, and Level III are major. It provides recommendations for chemistry, manufacturing, dissolution and bioequivalence testing for components/composition, site, batch size and manufacturing changes. Changes are supported by prior approval supplements, changes being effected supplements or annual reports with stability data as appropriate to the level of change.
The document discusses post-approval changes that can be made to approved NDAs and ANDAs. It describes four reporting categories for post-approval changes based on their potential impact: major changes requiring prior approval, moderate changes reported via a CBE-30 or CBE-0 supplement, minor changes reported annually. Examples are provided for different types of changes that fall under each reporting category. The levels of reporting ensure that manufacturers can make certain changes while providing appropriate notification to the FDA depending on the level of change.
This document provides guidance for classifying post-approval changes made to biological products as Level I, II, or III. Level I changes require a supplement submission and have a substantial effect on quality, safety or efficacy. Level II changes require notification and have a moderate effect. Level III changes are minor quality changes that do not require prior review but must be reported annually. The document describes examples of changes for drug substance, product, manufacturing, specifications, and stability and provides the recommended reporting category for each.
The document discusses change control management according to cGMP guidelines. It defines change control and why it is important to have a formal change control system to evaluate any changes that could affect product quality. It provides details on how to classify, document, review and approve changes, as well as testing and validation requirements. Specific guidance is given for process, equipment, raw material and analytical method changes.
(SUPAC- Part 3) (SCALE-UP AND POST APPROVAL CHANGES)kavita bahmani
This document summarizes the different levels of changes to the manufacturing process that require varying levels of documentation for supplemental approval. Level 1 changes are minor process changes within validated ranges that only require annual reporting. Level 2 changes are outside validated ranges and require additional stability testing and dissolution documentation. Level 3 changes altering the entire manufacturing process require the most extensive documentation, including chemistry reports, stability data from multiple batches, dissolution testing, and an in vivo bioequivalence study or correlation to prove equivalent performance between the original and changed product. The document also reviews the objectives, design considerations, and analysis of in vivo bioequivalence studies.
Similar to Scale Up And Post Approval Changes (SUPAC) (20)
Quality-by-Design In Pharmaceutical DevelopmentPrabhjot kaur
Quality-by-Design In Pharmaceutical Development: Introduction, ICH Q8 guideline, Regulatory and industry views on QbD, Scientifically based QbD - examples of application. M. Pharmacy 2nd Semester (Computer aided drug delivery system)
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
1. SCALE UP AND POSTAPPROVAL CHANGES (SUPAC)
GURU GOBIND SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY
SCALE UPAND POSTAPPROVAL CHANGES (SUPAC)
Presented To: Dr. Anjali Sharma Presented By: Prabhjot Kaur
M-507
3. INTRODUCTION
• The scale-up process and the changes made after approval in the composition,
manufacturing process, manufacturing equipment, and change of site are
known as Scale-Up and Post approval Changes, or SUPAC.
• Depending upon requirements, there can be changes in the raw materials,
process, equipment or manufacturing site, and batch size which ultimately
affect quality attributes of a drug or finished product.
• Therefore, there is a need of full evaluation of impact of any kind of change on
the quality of a drug or finished product.
4. PURPOSE OF GUIDANCE
• This guidance provides recommendations to sponsors of new drug applications
(NDA's) snd abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA's) who intend, during the
post approval period, to change:
1) The components or composition
2) The site of manufacture
3) The scale-up/scale-down of manufacture
4) The manufacturing (process and equipment) of an immediate release oral
formulation.
• This guidance thus sets application information that should be provided to CDER
to assure continuing product quality and performance characteristics for specified
post approval changes.
5. ADVANTAGES
• SUPAC guide line have advantages that:
• Shorter waiting time for site transfers reducing operating overhead &
maintenance expenses.
• More rapid implementation of process and equipment changes, improved yield
& Reduce failure investigations.
• More rapid implementation of batch size increases production of fewer
unmarketable stability batches.
• Reduce stability testing/costs.
6. WHAT SUPAC GUIDLINES DEFINE?
Level of
Changes
• Minor Change
• Moderate Change
• Major change
Tests
• Recommended chemistry, manufacturing, and controls tests for each level of
change
• In-vitro dissolution tests and/or in vivo bioequivalence tests for each level of
change
Filling
• Annual Report
• Changes being Effected Supplement
• Prior Approval Supplement
8. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
SITE CHANGES
• Site changes consist of changes in location of the site of manufacture.
• It does not include any scale-up changes, changes in manufacturing (including
process and/or equipment), or changes in components or composition.
• It includes Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 changes.
9. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
LEVEL 1 CHANGES
Define
It includes site changes within a single
facility where the same equipment,
(SOP's), environmental conditions and
controls, and personnel common to both
manufacturing sites are used. No changes
are made to the manufacturing batch
records, except for administrative
information and the location of the facility.
LEVEL 2 CHANGES LEVEL 3 CHANGES
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: None
beyond application/compendial release
requirements.
b. Dissolution Documentation: None
beyond application/compendial release
requirements.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence
Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Annual report.
Define
It includes site changes within a contiguous
campus, or between facilities in adjacent
city blocks, where the same equipment,
SOP's, environmental conditions and
controls, and personnel common to both
manufacturing sites are used. No changes
are made to the manufacturing batch
records, except for administrative
information and the location of the facility.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Location of
new site and updated batch records. None
beyond application/ compendial release
requirements. 1 batch on long-term stability
data reported in annual report.
b. Dissolution Documentation: None
beyond application/compendial release
requirements.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation:
None.
Filing Documentation
Changes being effected supplement
Annual report (long term stability test data).
Define
It includes site changes to a different
campus. the same equipment, SOP's,
environmental conditions, and controls should
be used, and no changes may be made to the
manufacturing
batch records except for administrative info,
location and language translation.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Location of
new site and updated batch records.
Application/compendial release requirements.
1 batch with 3 months accelerated stability
data reported in supplement; 1 batch on
long-term stability data reported in annual
report.
b. Dissolution Documentation: Multipoint
dissolution profile should be performed in the
application/compendia medium at 15, 30, 45,
60 and 120 min. The dissolution profile of the
drug product at the current and proposed site
should be similar (Case B).
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation:
None.
Filing Documentation
Changes being effected supplement, annual
report (long term stability test data).
10. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
Changes in Batch Size (Scale-
Up/ScaleDown)
• Post-approval changes in the size of a batch from the pivotal/pilot scale
biobatch material to larger or smaller production batches call for submission of
additional information in the application.
• Scale-down below 100,000 dosage units is not covered by this guidance.
11. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
LEVEL 1 CHANGES
Define
Change in batch size, up to and including a factor of 10 times the size
of the pilot/biobatch, where:
1) The equipment used to produce the test batch is of the same design
and operating principles
2) The batch is manufactured in full compliance with CGMP's;
3) The same (SOP's) and controls, as well as the same formulation
and manufacturing procedures, are used on the test batch and on the
full-scale production batch.
LEVEL 2 CHANGES
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification of change and
submission of updated batch records in annual report.1 batch on long-
term stability reported in annual report.
b. Dissolution Documentation: None beyond application/
compendial release requirements.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Annual report.
Define
Definition of Level Changes in batch size beyond a factor of
ten times the size of the pilot/biobatch, where:
1) The equipment used to produce the test batch is of the same
design and operating principles
2) The batch is manufactured in full compliance with CGMP's;
3) The same (SOP's) and controls, as well as the same
formulation and manufacturing procedures, are used on the test
batch and on the full-scale production batch.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification of change and
submission of updated batch records.
Stability testing: One batch with three months accelerated
stability data and one batch on long-term stability.
b. Dissolution Documentation: Case B.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Changes being effected supplement
Annual report (long term stability test data).
12. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
Manufacturing
• Manufacturing changes may affect both:
a) Equipment used in the manufacturing process
b) The process of Manufacturing
13. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
LEVEL 1 CHANGES
Define
This category consists of:
-Change from non-automated or non mechanical equipment to
automated or mechanical equipment to move ingredients.
-Change to alternative equipment of the same design and operating
principles of the same or of a different capacity.
LEVEL 2 CHANGES
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification of change and
submission of updated batch records.
Stability testing: One batch on longterm stability.
b. Dissolution Documentation: None beyond application/
compendial release requirements.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Annual report.
Define
Change in equipment to a different design and
different operating principles.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification of change and
submission of updated batch records.
Stability testing: Significant body of data available: One batch
with 3 months accelerated stability data reported in
supplement; one batch on long-term stability data reported in
annual report.
Significant body of data not available: Up to 3 batches with
3 months accelerated stability data reported in supplement; up
to 3 batches on long-term stability data reported in annual
report.
b. Dissolution Documentation: Case C.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Prior approval supplement with justification for change.
Annual report (long term stability test data).
Equipments
14. Site changes consist of changes in location of
the site of manufacture for both company_x0002_owned and contract manufacturing facilities and
do not include any scale-up changes, changes in
manufacturing (including process and/or
equipment), or changes in components or
composition.
LEVEL 1 CHANGES
Define
It includes process changes including
changes such as mixing times, operating
speeds within application/validation
ranges.
LEVEL 2 CHANGES
LEVEL 3 CHANGES
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: None
beyond application/compendial release
requirements.
b. Dissolution Documentation: None
beyond application/compendial release
requirements.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence
Documentation: None.
Filing Documentation
Annual report.
Define
It includes process changes including
changes such as mixing times and operating
speeds outside of application/validation
ranges.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification
of change and submission of updated batch
records.
Stability testing: One batch on long-term
stability.
b. Dissolution Documentation: Case B.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation:
None.
Filing Documentation
Changes being effected supplement
Annual report (long term stability test data).
Define
It includes change in the type of process used
in the manufacture of the product, such as a
change from wet granulation to direct
compression of dry powder.
Test Documentation
a. Chemistry Documentation: Notification
of change and submission of updated batch
records.
Stability testing: Significant body of data
available: 1 batch with 3 months accelerated
stability data reported in supplement; 1 batch
on long-term stability data reported in annual
report.
Significant body of data not available: Up to
3 batches with three months accelerated
stability data reported in supplement; up to 3
batches on long-term stability data reported in
annual report.
b. Dissolution Documentation: Case B.
c. In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation:
The bioequivalence study may be waived if a
suitable in vivo/in vitro correlation has been
verified.
Filing Documentation
Prior approval supplement with justification
annual report (long term stability test data).
Process