1. SAMPLE SCRIPTS
Financial educationshouldbe amandatorycomponentof the school program.To whatextentdoyou
agree or disagree withthisstatement?
Children in this modern era haveall the magnificent toys, food and many more
other interesting things thanin the past. They are bound to have a craving on all
this stuff that they see. In other words children will be spending money on
anything they want or find it interesting to them. Even someadults these days
have somekind of craving to the thing they find it amazing.
If financial education starts at the very beginning of the schoolyears, this will help
them to understand the value of money. Children should also be taught to
manage their expenses and ways to spend wisely. When a child is being taught
this in the schoolprogram, the child will be able to apply it when they are out to
purchaseor when they haveleft the school. They will not be cheated when they
are young and this will not only benefit their families but also the whole country
wherethey live when they are older.
However, there are somechildren that are capable of handle the their financial in
a very positive way even before they learned it at school. This children would
have learnt fromtheir families or people around them. They manage money
better, compared to the other children from wealthier families for whom
spending is not a problem.
My conclusion is, children regardless of their background should be taught
financial education from schoolat the very beginning then only parents guide
them fromhome as well.
An opening paragraph introducing the problem and mentioning the two opinions is needed.
The writer has not gone beyond ‘the first right answer’. Systemic errors such as intrusive
pronouns, misused prepositions, articles S-V agreement causes some strain. Also, there are
arguments for financial education and no arguments against, which means that the task is only
partially covered. Some of the sentences are unclear and their structure needs improvement.
Cont: 6 Org. 5 Lang. 5 Gr,& M 5 Band 5.
2. Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on
expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
With the proliferation of high-tech media, some people hold that the public
libraries would be rendered obsolete if they do not offer software, videos or
DVDs to their users while other assertit’s only a wasteof limited resources and
the libraries should offer books only.
High-tech media is, in many ways, indeed superior to the books in terms of
entertainment, attraction, and functionality. For instance, videos and DVDs
function as a visual means to assistpeople to have a first-hand experience even
though thosepeople have not physically visited or seen the objects which are
introduced in the books. Also, despite the audio-visualequipment would be
prohibitive to install, the capital cost would be lowered by appealing to a sizable
number of users.
More importantly, softwarecould assistthe library goers to access the Internet to
update their knowledgeon a daily basis; in contrast, books typically take multiple
months to be published, which in turn render their contents outdated to some
extent. In addition, upon learning that the computer literacy has become an
essential skill recently, public libraries should take on the responsibility to
educate its users how to operate a computer.
Furthermore, it is a common practice for mostpublic libraries to sharetheir
resources via the Internet. In this way, even if one book of interest cannot be
found in one library, the borrower still could locate the book from other libraries
and then request the librarians to transfer the book to that particular library.
In conclusion, public libraries would benefit in multiple ways if they are equipped
with the high-tech media.
Addresses the topic comprehensively. A variety of structures and some rare vocabulary a
few errors wrt verbs, prepositions and sentence formation.
Content 9 OS 8 Lang 8 Gr& Mech 8 Band 8.
3. Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others
think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons
to develop your essay.
It is certainly said that learning is an ongoing process .Every
person learn something new according to their age, experience, knowledge and
education. According to my point of view it is always better to have - teacher or
guide for study.
One teacher has adequate knowledge to teach their student. Heknows all the
possible ways to make subject easier for the students, moreover, he teaches them
in an effective manner. For example, some students are weak in some subjects but
a teacher always guides them according to their mental capacity. He teaches them
as fun. Some people can learn better in group by discuss the topics with others. In
class people can know the views of others, even they know how we can learn
effectively. Where the teacher always gives an easy direction to learn.
In the today’s competitive world, everybody is busy, some people think that rather
to waste their time to go for classes they can learn better their subject _. They can
attend online classes by using the Internet at home. They can get relevant
information from the Internet regarding their topic. There is not specific time or age
limit to learn something new. Some new things we can only learn from experience
– for example new facts, new habits and so on.
In sum up, I would like to say that it is always better for the people to have a
teacher because a teacher has good knowledge, experience and is educated how to
teach others. People will learn from a teacher in an easier way rather than on their
own.
Where are the paragraphs in this essay? You must be very careful using definitive words
such as ‘always’ and making statements about facts. The essay is for you to provide an
opinion and to provide supporting arguments. Also, the other side of the argument about
teachers that have limited knowledge or people that learn better on their own is not
presented here.
