The document provides baseline data and indicators for County X's agriculture sector plan. It outlines several goals and metrics for measuring progress, including: increasing agriculture's contribution to GDP, reducing rural poverty rates, reducing famine alerts, and reducing the population relying on food aid. For each indicator, it provides the current baseline data as of 2012 without intervention from the agriculture sector development program. It also lists several policy, funding, institutional, and partnership indicators and provides blank fields to input the current baseline statuses for County X to help guide and evaluate its agriculture sector development efforts.

1. County LFA- policy and institution baseline information
Indicators Baseline Data Needed Source
of
Data
Current
Status
Without
ASDSP
Intervention
National County x
G1: Increase in
agricultural sector
contribution to GDP
Current contribution of
Agri to GDP (by value
and %)
Secondary
and
institutions
24  By value =X KShs in 2012
 Proportion= X% in 2012
G2: Rural poverty of
male and female
population reduced
by 10% to 37.2% by
2014
Current % of poverty by
gender
Secondary
and
institutions
 52.9% total population in
2005/06 (X% Male and X%
Female)
 51% rural (X%M, X%F) 38%
urban ( X% M, X,F)
Check Kenya Integrated
household Survey/Census 2009
KER 2014, Country profile
G3: Number and
frequency of famine
alerts reduced
Current number of
famine alerts
Secondary
and
institutions
 Number of famine alerts in
2012=0
G4: Male and female
population
depending upon food
aid reduced by 5% by
2017
% of population relying
on food aid by gender
Secondary
and
institutions
 X% of people relying on
food aid in 2012
 X% males,
 X% Females
 X% Youth
NDMA REPORTS IN 22 ASALS,
Director Odour- other
counties fromCCUs ( District
strategic Plans, ),.

2. C1(a) Public spending
on agriculture as a
percentage of GDP
fromthe agriculture
sector
- Establish amount of
public expenditure on
agriculture -
Establish total GDP from
agriculture -
Calculate % of spending
in agriculture of total
agric. GDP (Allocation
at county level, have
actual for national
spending -actual figures
and %)
Secondary
and
Institutions
 Total county budget
2011/12 was X KShs in yr.
 Budget allocation for the
agriculture sector in
2011/12 was=Kshs
77,787,268 –will be
corrected-
 Total county expenditure in
2011/12 was X KShs Total
country agriculture
expenditure in 2011/12 was
X KShs 77,787,268- will be
corrected
In text disaggregate by
subsectors. Action-
% increase HH and
institutions who
notice long-term
changes in the
environment
-Current % of
Institutions reporting
noticing changes in
environment:
 Institutions experiencing
environmental change=

3. % increase of HH
and institutions
experiencing
climate Change in
their agricultural
activities
Current % institutions
experiencing climate
change:
 Institutions experiencing
climate change=97.5%
C2 (a) % increase in
households and
institutions who states
that their response
capacity to climate-
related risks has
improved, HH by
gender and
vulnerability
- Current % of
households and
Institutions stating their
response capacity to
climate related risks
improved
 Institutions undertaking
climate change
responses=76.7% (
1.1.1.1 % increase in
funding to ASDS
coordination
mechanism;
- Current level of annual
funding for ASDS
coordination ( Check
ASCU, possible no
finding)
Secondary
and
institutions
Budget for sector coordination
in 2012 Ksh
Expenditure for coordination in
2011/2012 Ksh
Report to show coordination
mechanisms in county.

4. 1.1.1.2 % increase in
ASDS coordination
client satisfaction
(functionality and
outcomes)
- Current % level of ASDS
client satisfaction for
ASDS coordination
(Check the functional
analysis)
Secondary
and
institutions
Level of satisfaction in
2012=X%
.
1.1.1.3 Increase in
horizontal and vertical
outreach of ASDS
coordination
- Current level of
horizontal and vertical
outreach of ASDSP
coordination
Secondary
and
institutions
Level of horizontal outreach in
2012l =n
Vertical outreach in 2012=n
1.2.1.1 % increase in
fulfilment of
performance indices
of key sector
institutions at all levels
- Current performance
index of key sector
institutions at all levels
(Performance
contracting and rating
has been changed)
-current pairwiserating
of the institutions- Write
in the report that this
was not established (
table 8), Pair vice
ranking of linkages and
benefits of institutions
should be established
by programme. John
Can we develop an
indice which qualifies
strong, medium, etc.?-
John
Secondary
and
institutions
Current performance index of
key institutions in 2012=n
Performanceranking
Ministry
Lands-1.9720
MOLD-2.293
water and irrigation-2.4390
environmentand mineral
resources-2.4834
Forestry and wildlife-2.5228
MOA-2.6113
Fisheries development-2.7581
State corporations
National irrigation board-2.0093
Coffee Research Foundation-
2.0175
Kenya seed-2.0356
AFC-2.2397
KEPHIS-2.2900

5. Current client
satisfaction index-Nick
ADC-2.4301
KARI-2.5263
Customer satisfaction rating
Lands-
MOLD-
Water and irrigation-
Environmentand mineral
resources-
Forestry and wildlife-
MOA-
Fisheries development-
State corporations
National irrigation board-
Coffee Research Foundation-
Kenya seed-
AFC-
KEPHIS-
ADC-
KARI-
current pairwise rating in
2012=n/%
TEXT
Client satisfaction index private
was given in confidence
therefore not published.
get public satisfaction indexes.
Delete irrelevant institutions for
the county. Text to indicate
need for accessing

6. performance for each relevant
institution ( public and private)
at county level. Public and
private Institutions to include
associations, Value chain
platforms of relevance.
1.2.1.2:% increase in
ASDSP performance
- Current ASDSP
performance index
Secondary
and
institutions
Current performance index of
ASDSP 2012=)
1.2.1.3 % increase in
client/customer
satisfaction with
ASDSP
- Current % of
client/customer
satisfaction
Policy &
Institutions
Client satisfaction in 2012=0
1.4.1.1 % annual
increase in proportion
of stakeholders (by
type) accessing
sector-wideM&E
services for various
uses, including
decision making (
knowledgedata
services)
- Current number of
stakeholders (by type)
assessing and current
number using sector
wide M&E services
Secondary
and
institutions
Number of stakeholders
assessing Sector M&E in 2012= 0
Confirmwith Planning-
1.4.1.2 % of
stakeholders showing
sustained use of one
or more sector-wide
M&E services
- Current % of
stakeholders using
sector wide M&E
services
Secondary
and
institutions
0 Confirmwith Planning-

7. 1.4.1.3 % increase in
proportion of
stakeholders satisfied
with sector-wideM&E
services
- Current number of
stakeholders satisfied
with sector-wideM&E
services
Secondary
and
institutions
Number of stakeholders
satisfied with sector M&E
services in 2012=0 Confirmwith
1.5.1.1 Sector policies,
strategies and
regulations in use
- No and types of
current sector policies in
use
- No and types of
current sector strategies
in use,
- No and types of
current sector
regulations in use
Type= Overarching,
Crops, Livestock, Water,
Environment,
Institutional,
Crosscutting, etc
Secondary
and
institutions
Number of policies in 2012=8
Number of strategies in 2012=3
Number of regulations in
2012=5
Apendice on all policies,
strategies, acts, regulations (
county)
We will get fromvalidation? If
not- “ at the time of survey the
following policies, strategies,
regulations were in
use......................”,
3.2.1 increase in
number and types of
investments under PPP
and by VC
-Current No. of
investments under PPP
by VC - Types of
investments under PPP
by VC
Secondary
and
institutions
No. of PPP investments in
2012=n
Total cost of PPP investments in
2012= X Kshs
No and Types of county PPPs in
County-

8. 1.1.1.1 Functional
operational
mandates and
procedures exist for
NF, ICC, TC, TWG and
ASCU
CSC, CCU, County
STHF
- Establish current status
of various operational
mandates and
procedures for various
committees and
working groups
Secondary
and
Institutions
Report to indicate that in
counties ASDS coordination
structures had not been
established in 2012.
1.1.2.1 % increase in
funding allocated to
ASDS coordination
fromGoK and DP
sources
- Current level of
funding from GoK and
DP to ASDS coordination
Secondary
and
institutions
County ASDS coordination
budget was 0. Report to
indicate that in counties ASDS
coordination structures had not
been established.
1.1.3.1 Joint sector
programming and
financing mechanism
in place
- Establish existence of
joint programming and
financing mechanism
Secondary
and
institutions
1
1.1.3.2 No. of DPs
funding ASDSP
- Establish current No. of
DPs funding ASDSP
Secondary
and
institutions
1.1.1.1 % increase in
programmes
adhering to CoC
- Establish current No. of
programmes adhering
to CoC
Secondary
and
institutions
1.1.5.1 ASDSP
steering, coordination
and management
structures in place
and functioning in
accordance with
sector-wide
approach (PSC, CSC,
- Establish existence of
ASDSP steering,
coordination and mgt
structures
Secondary
and
institutions

9. NPS, CCU)
Counties to set the baseline
1.1.5.2 Operational
procedures and
guidelines reflecting
ASDSP’s sector-wide
approach applied
-Establish existence of
operational procedures
and guidelines
reflecting ASDSP's sector
wide approach
Secondary
and
institutions
1.1.5.3 Technical
and operational
capacity
- Establish existence of
technical and
operational capacity at
ADSP??
Secondary
and
institutions
1.2.1.1 % ASDSP
stakeholders
expressing satisfaction
with programme
performance
- Establish % of ASDSP
stakeholders expressing
satisfaction with
programme
performance
Secondary
and
institutions
1.2.1.2 Ratio of posts
filled by qualified staff
- Establish current level
of posts filled by
qualified staff
Secondary
and
institutions
1.2.2.2 Ratio of posts
filled by qualified staff
Repeated - 1.2.1.2 Secondary
and
institutions

10. 1.2.2.3 No of
institutional capacity
plans being
implemented
- Establish current of No.
institutional capacity
plans being
implemented
Secondary
and
institutions
1.3.1.1 No. and types
of functional
partnerships
- Current No. of
functional partnerships -
Current types of
functional partnerships
Secondary
and
institutions
1.3.3.1 No. and types
of partnerships
Repeated 1.3.1.1 Secondary
and
institutions
1.3.3.2 No. of sector
programmes
integrating operations
- Current No. of
programmes integrating
operations (Repeated?)
Secondary
and
institutions
1.3.2.3Functioning of
TWGs
- Current No. of
functioning TWGs
(Repeated?)
Secondary
and
institutions

11. 1.4.1.1 Functional
sector-wideM&E
system and
information systems in
use
- Establish existence of
functional sector-wide
M&E and information
systems -
Establish current use of
sector wide M&E system
Secondary
and
institutions
1.4.2.1 Functional
ASDSP M&E
information systemin
use
- Establish existence of
functional ASDSP M&E
information systems
- Establish current use of
ASDSP M&E information
system
Secondary
and
institutions
1.4.3.1 Functional
communication
mechanisms
including interactive
ICT platforms to
provide agricultural
information in use
-Establish existence of
functional
communications
mechanisms to provide
agricultural information
Secondary
and
institutions
1.5.1.1 No and types
of polices, strategies
and regulations
prepared and rolled
out
Repeated?? Secondary
and
institutions

12. 1.5.1.2 No and types
of implementation
frameworks
established and in use
- Establish current No. of
implementation
frameworks are in use -
Establish types of
implementation
frameworks are in use
Secondary
and
institutions
3.2.1.1 No., type and
coverage of
infrastructureprojects
established under PPP
-Current No. of
infrastructureprojects
established under PPP -
Current types of
infrastructureprojects
established under PPP -
Current coverage (by
area??) of infrastructure
projects established
under PPP
Secondary
and
institutions

13. 3.2.2.1 No., type and
coverage of projects
by VC actors
-Current No. of projects
by VC actors -Current
types of projects by VC
actors - Current
coverage (by area??)
of projects by VC actors
Secondary
and
institutions