presented by Stuart Macdonald at the College of Science and Engineering - "What's new for you in the Library“, Murray Library, Kings Buildings, University of Edinburgh. 28 May 2014
Covers research data, research data management, funder policies and the University's RDM policy, RDM services and support, awareness raising, training, progress so far.
A presentation given at the "Data Stewardship: Increasing the Integrity and Effectiveness of Science and Scholarship" Session on Friday, June 8 2012 at the IASSIT 2012 conference in Washington DC.
This presentation introduced data publishing, using a social science (archaeology) case study to explore editorial processes and dissemination outcomes that increasingly demand “Linked Data” capabilities.
Presentation given by Stuart Macdonald at the International Workshop on ICT and e-Knowledge for the Developing World in Shanghai International Convention Center, Pudong, Shanghai.
presented by Stuart Macdonald at the College of Science and Engineering - "What's new for you in the Library“, Murray Library, Kings Buildings, University of Edinburgh. 28 May 2014
Covers research data, research data management, funder policies and the University's RDM policy, RDM services and support, awareness raising, training, progress so far.
A presentation given at the "Data Stewardship: Increasing the Integrity and Effectiveness of Science and Scholarship" Session on Friday, June 8 2012 at the IASSIT 2012 conference in Washington DC.
This presentation introduced data publishing, using a social science (archaeology) case study to explore editorial processes and dissemination outcomes that increasingly demand “Linked Data” capabilities.
Presentation given by Stuart Macdonald at the International Workshop on ICT and e-Knowledge for the Developing World in Shanghai International Convention Center, Pudong, Shanghai.
Organizations focus on infrastructure, engagement and innovation. Libraries have emphasised infrastructure (collections, buildings to house those collections, systems, ...). In recent years they have been switching attention into engagement - better integration with their users' workflow, more direct support for research and learning, ...
This is a presentation from the OCLC EMEARC Regional Council meeting, February 2012.
The library and the network: scale, engagement, innovationlisld
Presented at Georgetown University Library. Discusses ongoing reconfiguration of libraries by networks. A shift from infrastructure to engagement around developing research and learning needs. Also includes some analysis of Georgetown collections in the context of Worldcat.
The identity of the library is closely bound with its collections. In a print world, this made sense, as the central role of the library was to place materials close to the user and arrange them for effective use.
However, in a network environment this is no longer the case. Lorcan Dempsey, Vice President, Membership and Research, and Chief Strategist at the Online Computer Library Center, will discuss the following three trends that are changing the character of library collections:
The facilitated collection, where the library connects users to resources of interest to their research and learning needs, whether or not they are assembled locally.
The collective collection, where libraries begin to think about moving to shared environments to manage their collections and assuming collective responsibility for stewardship of the scholarly record.
The inside-out collection, where libraries work with other campus partners to support the creation, management and disclosure of institutional materials—research data, special collections, and so on. Here the library supports the creative enterprise of scholarship directly. Together, these trends are changing how we think about collections, libraries, and services to their users.
Together, these trends are changing how we think about collections, libraries, and services to their users.
The Thomas Lecture Series honors the outstanding work that Shirley K. Baker, former Vice Chancellor for Scholarly Resources & Dean of University Libraries, led in the areas of networked information and resource sharing.
Library discovery: past, present and some futureslisld
A presentation at the NISO virtual conference on Webscale Discovery Services, 20 November 2013.
Considers some of the issues that have led to the adoption of these services, and some future directions.
Distinguishes between discovery (providing a library destination) and discoverability (making stuff discoverable elsewhere).
Presentation given by Peter Burnhill, director of EDINA, at #ReCon_15 : Beyond the paper: publishing data, software and more. Edinburgh, 19 June 2015
Peter Burnhill
http://reconevent.com/
OCLC Research @ U of Calgary: New directions for metadata workflows across li...OCLC Research
Presentation used as scene setting for 2 days worth of discussion around library, archive & museum convergence, metadata workflows and single search at the University of Calgary.
This presentation was given at Bobcatsss2013 in Ankara.
Once the library assembled a collection and people came to the library to use it. Now, people build communication, workflows and behaviors around a variety of network resources. The library needs to think about how it is visible and relevant in those workflows and behaviors.
Keynote presentation at the Lita Forum, Albuquerque. Research and learning practices are enacted in technology rich environments. New tools support digital workflows and the volume and variety of research and learning outputs are growing. Libraries are working to support these new environments and to connect their services to them.
Challenges and opportunities for academic librarieslisld
Research and learning behaviors are changing in a network environment. What challenges do Academic libraries face? What opportunities do they have? A presentation given at a symposium on the future of academic libraries at the Open University.
Presenter: Peter Burnhill, Director, EDINA national academic data centre, University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Presentation given at Beyond Books: What STM & Social Science publishing should learn from each other Marriott Hotel/Kensington, London, 22 April 2010
Collection directions - towards collective collectionslisld
How the emergence of new research and learning workflows in digital environments is affecting library collecting and collections. Several trends are reviewed. In the light of diversifying competing requirements, the need to manage down print and develop shared print responses is discussed.
Presentation to OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council meeting. 13 Oct. 2014.
Towards collaboration at scale: Libraries, the social and the technicallisld
Libraries are now supporting research and learning behaviors in data rich network environments. This presentation looks at some examples focusing on how an emphasis on individual systems needs to give way to a broader view of process, workflow and behaviors.
It also discusses how this environment creates a demand for collaboration at scale among libraries.
Metadata plays an increasingly central role as a tool enabling the large-scale, distributed management of resources. However, metadata communities which have traditionally worked in relative isolation have struggled to make their specifications interoperate with others in the shared web environment.
This webinar explores how metadata standards with significantly different characteristics can productively coexist and how previously isolated metadata communities can work towards harmonization. The webinar presents a solution-oriented analysis of current issues in metadata harmonization with a focus on specifications of importance to the learning technology and library environments, notably Dublin Core, IEEE Learning Object Metadata, and W3C's Resource Description Framework. Providing concrete illustrations of harmonization problems and a roadmap for designing metadata for maximum interoperability, this webinar will provide a bird's-eye perspective on the respective roles of metadata syntaxes, formats, semantics, abstract models, vocabularies, and application profiles in achieving metadata harmonization.
The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) is responsible for the development and maintenance of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), UNIMARC, and the "Functional Requirements" family for bibliographic records (FRBR), authority data (FRAD), and subject authority data (FRSAD). ISBD underpins the MARC family of formats used by libraries world-wide for many millions of catalog records, while FRBR is a relatively new model optimized for users and the digital environment. These metadata models, schemas, and content rules are now being expressed in the Resource Description Framework language for use in the Semantic Web.
This webinar provides a general update on the work being undertaken. It describes the development of an Application Profile for ISBD to specify the sequence, repeatability, and mandatory status of its elements. It discusses issues involved in deriving linked data from legacy catalogue records based on monolithic and multi-part schemas following ISBD and FRBR, such as the duplication which arises from copy cataloging and FRBRization. The webinar provides practical examples of deriving high-quality linked data from the vast numbers of records created by libraries, and demonstrates how a shift of focus from records to linked-data triples can provide more efficient and effective user-centered resource discovery services.
Organizations focus on infrastructure, engagement and innovation. Libraries have emphasised infrastructure (collections, buildings to house those collections, systems, ...). In recent years they have been switching attention into engagement - better integration with their users' workflow, more direct support for research and learning, ...
This is a presentation from the OCLC EMEARC Regional Council meeting, February 2012.
The library and the network: scale, engagement, innovationlisld
Presented at Georgetown University Library. Discusses ongoing reconfiguration of libraries by networks. A shift from infrastructure to engagement around developing research and learning needs. Also includes some analysis of Georgetown collections in the context of Worldcat.
The identity of the library is closely bound with its collections. In a print world, this made sense, as the central role of the library was to place materials close to the user and arrange them for effective use.
However, in a network environment this is no longer the case. Lorcan Dempsey, Vice President, Membership and Research, and Chief Strategist at the Online Computer Library Center, will discuss the following three trends that are changing the character of library collections:
The facilitated collection, where the library connects users to resources of interest to their research and learning needs, whether or not they are assembled locally.
The collective collection, where libraries begin to think about moving to shared environments to manage their collections and assuming collective responsibility for stewardship of the scholarly record.
The inside-out collection, where libraries work with other campus partners to support the creation, management and disclosure of institutional materials—research data, special collections, and so on. Here the library supports the creative enterprise of scholarship directly. Together, these trends are changing how we think about collections, libraries, and services to their users.
Together, these trends are changing how we think about collections, libraries, and services to their users.
The Thomas Lecture Series honors the outstanding work that Shirley K. Baker, former Vice Chancellor for Scholarly Resources & Dean of University Libraries, led in the areas of networked information and resource sharing.
Library discovery: past, present and some futureslisld
A presentation at the NISO virtual conference on Webscale Discovery Services, 20 November 2013.
Considers some of the issues that have led to the adoption of these services, and some future directions.
Distinguishes between discovery (providing a library destination) and discoverability (making stuff discoverable elsewhere).
Presentation given by Peter Burnhill, director of EDINA, at #ReCon_15 : Beyond the paper: publishing data, software and more. Edinburgh, 19 June 2015
Peter Burnhill
http://reconevent.com/
OCLC Research @ U of Calgary: New directions for metadata workflows across li...OCLC Research
Presentation used as scene setting for 2 days worth of discussion around library, archive & museum convergence, metadata workflows and single search at the University of Calgary.
This presentation was given at Bobcatsss2013 in Ankara.
Once the library assembled a collection and people came to the library to use it. Now, people build communication, workflows and behaviors around a variety of network resources. The library needs to think about how it is visible and relevant in those workflows and behaviors.
Keynote presentation at the Lita Forum, Albuquerque. Research and learning practices are enacted in technology rich environments. New tools support digital workflows and the volume and variety of research and learning outputs are growing. Libraries are working to support these new environments and to connect their services to them.
Challenges and opportunities for academic librarieslisld
Research and learning behaviors are changing in a network environment. What challenges do Academic libraries face? What opportunities do they have? A presentation given at a symposium on the future of academic libraries at the Open University.
Presenter: Peter Burnhill, Director, EDINA national academic data centre, University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Presentation given at Beyond Books: What STM & Social Science publishing should learn from each other Marriott Hotel/Kensington, London, 22 April 2010
Collection directions - towards collective collectionslisld
How the emergence of new research and learning workflows in digital environments is affecting library collecting and collections. Several trends are reviewed. In the light of diversifying competing requirements, the need to manage down print and develop shared print responses is discussed.
Presentation to OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council meeting. 13 Oct. 2014.
Towards collaboration at scale: Libraries, the social and the technicallisld
Libraries are now supporting research and learning behaviors in data rich network environments. This presentation looks at some examples focusing on how an emphasis on individual systems needs to give way to a broader view of process, workflow and behaviors.
It also discusses how this environment creates a demand for collaboration at scale among libraries.
Metadata plays an increasingly central role as a tool enabling the large-scale, distributed management of resources. However, metadata communities which have traditionally worked in relative isolation have struggled to make their specifications interoperate with others in the shared web environment.
This webinar explores how metadata standards with significantly different characteristics can productively coexist and how previously isolated metadata communities can work towards harmonization. The webinar presents a solution-oriented analysis of current issues in metadata harmonization with a focus on specifications of importance to the learning technology and library environments, notably Dublin Core, IEEE Learning Object Metadata, and W3C's Resource Description Framework. Providing concrete illustrations of harmonization problems and a roadmap for designing metadata for maximum interoperability, this webinar will provide a bird's-eye perspective on the respective roles of metadata syntaxes, formats, semantics, abstract models, vocabularies, and application profiles in achieving metadata harmonization.
The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) is responsible for the development and maintenance of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), UNIMARC, and the "Functional Requirements" family for bibliographic records (FRBR), authority data (FRAD), and subject authority data (FRSAD). ISBD underpins the MARC family of formats used by libraries world-wide for many millions of catalog records, while FRBR is a relatively new model optimized for users and the digital environment. These metadata models, schemas, and content rules are now being expressed in the Resource Description Framework language for use in the Semantic Web.
This webinar provides a general update on the work being undertaken. It describes the development of an Application Profile for ISBD to specify the sequence, repeatability, and mandatory status of its elements. It discusses issues involved in deriving linked data from legacy catalogue records based on monolithic and multi-part schemas following ISBD and FRBR, such as the duplication which arises from copy cataloging and FRBRization. The webinar provides practical examples of deriving high-quality linked data from the vast numbers of records created by libraries, and demonstrates how a shift of focus from records to linked-data triples can provide more efficient and effective user-centered resource discovery services.
A controversial discussion of the utility of DBpedia as authority data with examples from a project at the Library of Congress. Part of an ExLibris-sponsored panel discussion at ALA Chicago 2009.
70+ slides of highlights and quotes from all of the MozCon Day #1. See all of our coverage at http://www.contentharmony.com/blog/mozcon-2013-coverage/ & http://www.contentharmony.com/blog/mozcon-2013-tools/
Functional and Architectural Requirements for Metadata: Supporting Discovery...Jian Qin
The tremendous growth in digital data has led to an increase in metadata initiatives for different types of scientific data, as evident in Ball’s survey (2009). Although individual communities have specific needs, there are shared goals that need to be recognized if systems are to effectively support data sharing within and across all domains. This paper considers this need, and explores systems requirements that are essential for metadata supporting the discovery and management of scientific data. The paper begins with an introduction and a review of selected research specific to metadata modeling in the sciences. Next, the paper’s goals are stated, followed by the presentation of valuable systems requirements. The results include a base-model with three chief principles: principle of least effort, infrastructure service, and portability. The principles are intended to support “data user” tasks. Results also include a set of defined user tasks and functions, and applications scenarios.
Slides from a talk I gave at Perspectives Workshop on Semantic Web, http://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=09271 ... Dagstuhl, Germany 2009-06-29. Title was from Jim Hender!
Open data is a crucial prerequisite for inventing and disseminating the innovative practices needed for agricultural development. To be usable, data must not just be open in principle—i.e., covered by licenses that allow re-use. Data must also be published in a technical form that allows it to be integrated into a wide range of applications. The webinar will be of interest to any institution seeking ways to publish and curate data in the Linked Data cloud.
This webinar describes the technical solutions adopted by a widely diverse global network of agricultural research institutes for publishing research results. The talk focuses on AGRIS, a central and widely-used resource linking agricultural datasets for easy consumption, and AgriDrupal, an adaptation of the popular, open-source content management system Drupal optimized for producing and consuming linked datasets.
Agricultural research institutes in developing countries share many of the constraints faced by libraries and other documentation centers, and not just in developing countries: institutions are expected to expose their information on the Web in a re-usable form with shoestring budgets and with technical staff working in local languages and continually lured by higher-paying work in the private sector. Technical solutions must be easy to adopt and freely available.
Slides from my talk "Unicorns and Other Wild Things" at the IA Summit 2013 in Baltimore, MD.
Audio and transcripts: http://library.iasummit.org/podcasts/unicorns-and-other-wild-things/
http://lanyrd.com/2013/iasummit/sccqpm/
About the Webinar
In May 2012, the Library of Congress announced a new modeling initiative focused on reflecting the MARC 21 library standard as a Linked Data model for the Web, with an initial model to be proposed by the consulting company Zepheira. The goal of the initiative is to translate the MARC 21 format to a Linked Data model while retaining the richness and benefits of existing data in the historical format.
In this webinar, Eric Miller of Zepheira will report on progress towards this important goal, starting with an analysis of the translation problem and concluding with potential migration scenarios for a broad-based transition from MARC to a new bibliographic framework.
As described in the April NISO/DCMI webinar by Dan Brickley, schema.org is a search-engine initiative aimed at helping webmasters use structured data markup to improve the discovery and display of search results. Drupal 7 makes it easy to markup HTML pages with schema.org terms, allowing users to quickly build websites with structured data that can be understood by Google and displayed as Rich Snippets.
Improved search results are only part of the story, however. Data-bearing documents become machine-processable once you find them. The subject matter, important facts, calendar events, authorship, licensing, and whatever else you might like to share become there for the taking. Sales reports, RSS feeds, industry analysis, maps, diagrams and process artifacts can now connect back to other data sets to provide linkage to context and related content. The key to this is the adoption standards for both the data model (RDF) and the means of weaving it into documents (RDFa). Drupal 7 has become the leading content platform to adopt these standards.
This webinar will describe how RDFa and Drupal 7 can improve how organizations publish information and data on the Web for both internal and external consumption. It will discuss what is required to use these features and how they impact publication workflow. The talk will focus on high-level and accessible demonstrations of what is possible. Technical people should learn how to proceed while non-technical people will learn what is possible.
As described in the April NISO/DCMI webinar by Dan Brickley, schema.org is a search-engine initiative aimed at helping webmasters use structured data markup to improve the discovery and display of search results. Drupal 7 makes it easy to markup HTML pages with schema.org terms, allowing users to quickly build websites with structured data that can be understood by Google and displayed as Rich Snippets.
Improved search results are only part of the story, however. Data-bearing documents become machine-processable once you find them. The subject matter, important facts, calendar events, authorship, licensing, and whatever else you might like to share become there for the taking. Sales reports, RSS feeds, industry analysis, maps, diagrams and process artifacts can now connect back to other data sets to provide linkage to context and related content. The key to this is the adoption standards for both the data model (RDF) and the means of weaving it into documents (RDFa). Drupal 7 has become the leading content platform to adopt these standards.
This webinar will describe how RDFa and Drupal 7 can improve how organizations publish information and data on the Web for both internal and external consumption. It will discuss what is required to use these features and how they impact publication workflow. The talk will focus on high-level and accessible demonstrations of what is possible. Technical people should learn how to proceed while non-technical people will learn what is possible.
Libraries around the world have a long tradition of maintaining authority files to assure the consistent presentation and indexing of names. As library authority files have become available online, the authority data has become accessible -- and many have been published as Linked Open Data (LOD) -- but names in one library authority file typically had no link to corresponding records for persons and organizations in other library authority files. After a successful experiment in matching the Library of Congress/NACO authority file with the German National Library's authority file, an online system called the Virtual International Authority File was developed to facilitate sharing by ingesting, matching, and displaying the relations between records in multiple authority files.
The Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) has grown from three source files in 2007 to more than two dozen files today. The system harvests authority records, enhances them with bibliographic information and brings them together into clusters when it is confident the records describe the same identity. Although the most visible part of VIAF is a HTML interface, the API beneath it supports a linked data view of VIAF with URIs representing the identities themselves, not just URIs for the clusters. It supports names for person, corporations, geographic entities, works, and expressions. With English, French, German, Spanish interfaces (and a Japanese in process), the system is used around the world, with over a million queries per day.
Speaker
Thomas Hickey is Chief Scientist at OCLC where he helped found OCLC Research. Current interests include metadata creation and editing systems, authority control, parallel systems for bibliographic processing, and information retrieval and display. In addition to implementing VIAF, his group looks into exploring Web access to metadata, identification of FRBR works and expressions in WorldCat, the algorithmic creation of authorities, and the characterization of collections. He has an undergraduate degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Library and Information Science.
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
John Mark Ockerbloom, Digital Library Architect and Planner, University of Pennsylvania
BIBFLOW and the Libhub Initiative: Leveraging our past to define our future
Eric Miller, President, Zepheira
Jeff Penka, Director of Channel and Product Development, Zepheira
Wnl 122 towards social sementic by samhati soorKishor Satpathy
Paper Presented during International Conference on What’s next in libraries? Trends, Space, and partnerships held during January 21-23, 2015 at NIT Silchar, Assam. It is being jointly organized by NIT Silchar, in association with its USA partner the Mortenson Center for International Library Programs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Researcher Reliance on Digital Libraries: A Descriptive AnalysisIJAEMSJORNAL
The digital library is an information technology that is structured as a digital knowledge resource, or can be alluded to a medium that stores information for a huge scope and is teamed up with the information the board gadget equipped for showing the information or information required by the client. Digital libraries can be extensively characterized as an information stockpiling and recovery frameworks that control digital information in the media (text, pictures, sound, static or dynamic) on the web. The main aim of this study is to study the awareness and using pattern of digital library by the researchers, to analyse the influence of digital library on researchers’ efficiency, analyse the purpose of using Digital Library Consortium, decide the effect of problems and motivational components of the digital library on the users, evaluate the satisfaction level of users with coverage of journals and perspectives on training and awareness programs and propose the available resources for effective utilization of the Digital Library.
Web-scale Discovery Services are becoming an integral part of libraries' information gathering arsenal. These services are able to use a single interface to seamlessly integrate results from a wide range of online sources, emulating the experience patrons have come to expect from Internet search engines. But despite their ability to streamline searching, discovery services provide a wide set of challenges for libraries who implement them. This virtual conference will touch on both the potential of discovery services as well as some of the issues involved.
In the recent past, Resource sharing concept has become prime factor and playing vital role in
libraries because of innovative developments in Information, Communication and Technology
(ICT). ICT has made easy to establish networks among libraries and share their information
resources quickly and instantly. Resource sharing has become prime reason for establishing
cooperation between libraries without any geographical barriers. The various reasons for resource
sharing are might be cost benefits, non-availability of resources, insufficient library funds, lack of
skills etc. In this paper, the attempt has been made to understand the various aspects of resource
sharing in modern library technological environment.
Digital Academic Content and the Future of Libraries: International Cooperati...UBC Library
International Library Cooperation Symposium presentation May 14, 2010 in Tokyo, Japan.
Presentation by Ingrid Parent, President elect of IFLA, and University Librarian at the University of British Columbia
Presentation by Ingrid Parent: Digital Academic Content and the Future of Lib...Ingrid Parent
International Library Cooperation Symposium presentation May 14, 2010 in Tokyo, Japan. Presentation by Ingrid Parent, President elect of IFLA, and University Librarian at the University of British Columbia
A new generation of library resource sharing solutions is helping libraries transform legacy ILL practices and systems. Solutions such as Project Reshare, RapidILL from Ex Libris and Tipasa from OCLC are helping to build peer-to-peer resource sharing communities such as the N8+, improve the user experience and reduce costs and complexity. They are also challenging assumptions about library collections and the value of big deals, helping to drive forward a more open and equitable research environment.
Information is a fast growing entity, and Library is also an ever growing organization. It is always seen that library and information centers always welcome the new technologies so that they can satisfy the users’ information needs. Therefore it is not surprising that, library & information centers adapting recent trends. This paper is a study in some selected colleges of Coimbatore district. It is an attempt to study the present scenario of these colleges.
Similar to Aligning library services with emerging research data needs (20)
Improving Integrity, Transparency, and Reproducibility Through Connection of ...Andrew Sallans
The Center for Open Science (COS) was founded as a non-profit technology start-up in 2013 with the goal of improving transparency and reproducibility by connecting the scholarly workflow. COS achieves this goal through the development of a free, open source web application called the Open Science Framework (OSF), providing features like file sharing and citing, persistent urls, provenance tracking, and automated versioning. Initial workflow API connections focused on storage services and included Figshare, GitHub, Amazon S3, Dropbox, and Dataverse. The team is now working to connect other parts of the workflow with services like DMPTool, Databib/re3data, and Databrary. This session will introduce the core architecture and the problems that it solves, and illustrate how connecting services can benefit everyone involved in supporting the research ecosystem. COS is funded through the generosity of grants from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the John Templeton Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Association of Research Libraries, and others.
Presented at CNI Fall 2014, Washington, DC.
Open Science Framework (OSF): Presentation and TrainingAndrew Sallans
Presentation Date: December 12, 2013.
Location: UC Berkeley, CA
Presenters: Johanna Cohoon & Andrew Sallans (Center for Open Science)
Center for Open Science website: http://centerforopenscience.org
Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences website: http://bitss.org/annual-meeting/2013-2/
UVa Library Scientific Data Consulting Group (SciDaC): New Partnerships and...Andrew Sallans
A. Sallans. "UVa Library Scientific Data Consulting Group (SciDaC): New Partnerships and Services to Support Scientific Data in the Library." Presented at the 2011 International Association for Social Science Information Services and Technology.
A. Sallans. "Practical Applications of e-Science." Presented at the 2011 eScience Bootcamp at the University of Virginia's Claude Moore Health Sciences Library. 4 March 2011
Understanding the Big Picture of e-ScienceAndrew Sallans
A. Sallans. "Understanding the Big Picture of e-Science." Presented at the 2011 eScience Bootcamp at the University of Virginia's Claude Moore Health Sciences Library. 4 March 2011
NSF Data Management Plan - Implications for LibrariansAndrew Sallans
A. Sallans. "NSF Data Management Plan - Implications for Librarians." Presented at the Science and Technology Section (STS) Hot Topics Discussion Group Meeting of the American Library Association's 2011 Midwinter Meeting. 8 January 2011
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
Aligning library services with emerging research data needs
1. Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs
University
of
Tennessee
Libraries
Visit
4/19/13
Andrew
Sallans,
Head
of
Strategic
Data
IniBaBves,
University
of
Virginia
Library
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
2. A
view
of
the
UVA
research
landscape
• Focus
on
moving
up
rankings
• Part
of
strategy
is
an
increased
focus
on
research
acBviBes
and
grant
funding
• Around
$300M
per
year
in
research
funding,
with
drops
in
recent
years
in
part
due
to
less
available
funding
and
more
compeBBon
– Most
from
NIH,
but
also
lots
from
NSF,
DOD,
DOE
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
3. Many
strategies…
• Commission
on
the
Future
of
the
University
(COFU)
in
2007
– ParBcularly
the
creaBon
of
two
centers
for
computaBonally-‐intense
research
– hJp://www.virginia.edu/planningdocuments/commission/
• Development
of
cyberinfrastructure
to
support
research
– Internet2
partnerships,
fiber
upgrades,
Hydra,
Academic
PreservaBon
Trust,
Digital
PreservaBon
Network,
etc.
• Many
iniBaBves
starBng
up
by
faculty
to
advance
research
agendas,
enable
recruitment
of
top
faculty,
top
postdocs,
top
students
– QuanBtaBve
CollaboraBve
– Big
Data
– Census
Research
Center
possibility
– Assorted
school
strategic
plans
for
research
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
4. Where
does
the
Library
stand?
TradiBonal
services
• Public
services
profile,
resource
focus
on
• CollecBons
support
for
teaching,
• Subject
liaisons
discovery,
and
access
to
• DigiBzaBon
collecBons
content
Successful
“edge”
• Electronic
Text
Center
(eText)
iniBaBves
to
meet
• GeospaBal
StaBsBcal
Data
Center
(GeoStat)
emerging
needs
over
• Scholars
Lab
past
two
decades
not
• Research
CompuBng
Lab
well
integrated
into
core
• Digital
Media
Lab
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
5. What
value
might
the
Library
bring
to
the
new
strategic
agenda?
• What
are
the
high
value
services?
– FaciliBes
are
in
high
demand,
but
largely
as
a
study
space
for
students
– Many
researchers
only
use
online
services/collecBons
– Demand
in
new
areas
• Departments
are
reclaiming
and
repurposing
smaller
domain
libraries
• Even
harder
to
easily
sort
support
funcBons
into
buckets
– Who
supports
analysis?
– Infrastructure?
– Data
management
requirements?
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
6. Strategy
map
Enabling research, teaching, and learning through services, collections, tools, and
spaces for the faculty and students of today and tomorrow.
Source:
hJp://strategy.library.virginia.edu/
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
7. Top
Library
prioriBes
• Improve
the
Student
Experience
-‐
create
a
coordinated
focus
on
student
experience
across
the
Library
system
• Digital
Preserva=on
-‐
build
capacity
for
digital
preservaBon
of
all
formats
• Data
Services
-‐
establish
a
full
suite
of
services
to
support
scholars'
ability
to
acquire,
create,
use,
manage
and
preserve
data
• New
Collec=on
Models
-‐
develop
new
resource
distribuBon
models
and
collaboraBve
methods
for
collecBon
access
• Alderman
Renova=on
-‐
secure
funding
for
major
renovaBon
of
Alderman
Library
• What's
Next
Process
-‐
experiment
with
new
ways
to
become
a
flexible
and
nimble
organizaBon
that
is
beJer
prepared
for
a
changing
future
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
8. Data
management:
a
specific
need
and
opportunity
• May
2010
announcement
of
upcoming
NSF
DMP
requirement
• Administrators
recognize
new
requirement
and
insufficient
researcher
preparedness
as
a
risk
to
future
funding
goals
• Our
team
was
already
headed
in
this
direcBon,
and
had
built
experience
in
this
broader
area
through
previous
efforts
• Library
made
case
to
take
on
support,
and
received
endorsement
and
buy-‐in
from
research
and
IT
leadership
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
9. An
evoluBon
of
services
Electronic
Text
(Etext)
Center
Science
and
Research
ScienBfic
Data
and
GeospaBal
Engineering
CompuBng
Lab
ConsulBng
What
comes
and
StaBsBcal
Digital
IniBaBve
(RCL),
(SciDaC)
Group,
next?
Data
(GeoStat)
(SEDI)
Lab,
Center,
2006-‐2010
2010-‐Present
2003
-‐2006
1990s-‐2006
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
10. Genng
SciDaC
started:
May
2010
Assessment
Data
Interviews
Planning
Data
Management
Plan
Support
ImplementaBon
Data
in
the
InsBtuBonal
Repository
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
11. Engaging
on
many
fronts
Front-‐line
• Advising
on
data
management
planning
• ConsulBng
on
data
management
process
improvement
and
curaBon
Services
• Training
on
requirements
and
best
pracBces
• DMPTool
for
efficiency
in
offering
DMP
services
and
sharing
best
pracBces
Process
• Policy
revision
and
recommendaBons
Improvement
• Serving
as
the
bridge
for
insBtuBonal
data
management
services
Infrastructure
• Repository
services
(Libra,
Academic
PreservaBon
Trust,
Digital
Development
PreservaBon
Network)
• ContribuBng
use
cases
and
real
requirements
to
development
efforts
Community-‐ • Involvement
in
naBonal
iniBaBves
to
develop
parts
of
our
support
model
wide
• Developing
collaboraBons
to
share
and
gain
experBse
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
12. Assessment
/
data
interviews
• Over
past
two
years
we
conducted
about
25
data
interviews
– Focus
on
learning
about
research
data
pracBces
at
UVa
and
idenBfying
service
needs/opportuniBes
– IntenBon
of
leading
into
consulBng
opportuniBes
• Ended
up
with
conundrum
of
how
to
manage
“unique”
condiBons
of
each
research
environment
against
common
characterisBcs
of
data
management
within
domains
and
insBtuBonal
framework
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
13. Assessment
workflow
Distribute
final
report
Send
iniBal
report
to
and
begin
DM
Conduct
Data
researcher
for
ImplementaBon
with
Interview
approval/review
Researcher
Produce
"Data
Code
Data
Extract
acBon
Interview
Report"
Interview
statements
from
answers
in
the
“DM
Vitals
“DM
Vitals”
tool
RecommendaBons
Report"
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
14. Turning
the
assessment
into
recommendaBons
• Must
be
a
fast
process
• Must
create
acBonable
and
repeatable
recommendaBons
• Must
reduce
subjecBvity
• Must
weigh
all
assessment
factors
• Must
address
present
DM
condiBon
while
showing
path
for
improvement
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
15. DMVitals
to
score
the
assessment
• Data
management
best
pracBce
statements
– UVa
sources
(ISPRO,
SciDaC
Guidelines)
– ANDS
long-‐term
sustainability
scoring
model
• 8
data
management
categories
• Data
interview
quesBons
and
responses
• Incorporated
data
management
maturity
index
of
Crowston
&
Qin
Capability
Maturity
Model
(CMM)
for
ScienBfic
Data
Management
(SDM)
See
full
presentaBon
from
IASSIST
2012:
hJp://www.slideshare.net/ASallans/dmvitals-‐a-‐data-‐
management-‐assessment-‐recommendaBons-‐tool-‐iassist-‐2012
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
16. Example
of
similar
sustainability
model
Crowston,
K.
&
J.
Qin.
(2010).
A
capability
maturity
model
for
scien=fic
data
management.
In:
Proceedings
of
the
American
Society
for
Informa=on
Science
and
Technology,
October
24-‐26,
2010,
PiWsburgh,
PA.
(Poster)
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
17. DMVitals
scoring
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
18. DMVitals
report
view
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
19. RecommendaBons
package
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
20. Planning
/
data
management
plan
support
• IniBally
asked
to
provide
boilerplate
text
for
researchers,
we
resisted
this
approach
• Began
providing
services
by
developing
a
very
user-‐centered
template
approach,
incorporaBng
Q&A
and
guidance
• Heavy
focus
on
collaboraBve
development
with
our
team
and
iteraBve
revision
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
21. Data
management
plan
support
today
• We’ve
consulted
directly
on
about
50
DMPs
over
the
course
of
the
past
2
years
• IniBal
focus
was
NSF
and
science/engineering,
but
we’ve
now
seen
them
from
most
domains
and
funding
agencies
• We
offer
2
business
day
turn-‐around
on
review,
iteraBve
feedback
and
advising
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
22. Scaling
the
DMP
consulBng
service
Growth
of
DMPTool
Plans
by
Ins=tu=on
160
U
of
Virginia
140
120
Average
of
100
partners
80
Average
of
all
insBtuBons
60
counted
40
Max
of
all
insBtuBons
counted
20
Min
of
all
0
insBtuBons
counted
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
23. DMP
consulBng
review
• We
worked
with
our
sponsored
research
office
to
review
all
DMPs
submiJed
by
UVA
to
NSF
• We
have
not
yet
completed
our
full
analysis
(and
will
not
be
sharing
the
results
publicly)
but
iniBal
review
shows
a
few
general
trends:
– Very
clear
which
DMPs
we
reviewed
– PreJy
clear
which
DMPs
were
copied
from
those
we
reviewed
– Significant
room
to
improve
amongst
invesBgators
in
understanding
of
what’s
required
and
what
resources
are
available
to
support
compliance
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
24. DMP
consulBng
next
steps
• Despite
administraBve
buy-‐in
and
endorsement,
and
community
appreciaBon
of
our
efforts,
use
is
sBll
lower
than
desired
and
overall
quality
of
DMPs
(per
our
study)
is
sBll
very
sub
par
• Working
to
get
agreement
for
pilot
of
mandated
DMP
review
as
checkpoint
within
one
school’s
grant
review
processes
– Low
cost
and
risk
to
school,
potenBal
high
return
to
grant
rates,
plan
quality,
and
compliance
– High
value
agreement
for
sustaining
our
services
and
ensuring
broader
impact
of
efforts
upon
insBtuBonal
goals
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
25. ImplementaBon
/
data
in
the
insBtuBonal
repository
• Improvement
of
upstream
data
management
pracBces
to
improve
quality
in
downstream
preservaBon
• Development
of
mechanisms
for
preservaBon
of
data
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
26. Shising
into
“operaBonal”
support
• ImplementaBon
of
grant-‐driven
DMPs
(cited
as
highest
value
service
by
one
dean)
• Plans
for
the
sake
of
doing
beJer
research,
efficiency,
cost-‐
savings,
risk
miBgaBon
• Using
notebook
approach
• SBll
wrangling
with
how
to
keep
things
moving
and
genng
people
to
act
(carrot
vs.
sBck)
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
27. Selected
addiBonal
efforts
• Data
Rights
and
ResponsibiliBes
Guidance
– hJp://www.lib.virginia.edu/brown/data/datarights.html
• Data
Management
Day
at
UVA
• Graduate
Student
Data
Management
Portal
– hJp://pages.shanB.virginia.edu/SciDaC_Grad_Training/
• Graduate
Student
Data
Management
Bootcamp
(in
partnership
with
Virginia
Tech
Libraries)
• ASERL/SURA
Model
Language
for
Research
Data
Management
Policies
– hJp://www.aserl.org/wp-‐content/uploads/2013/01/ASERL-‐
SURA_Model_Language_RDM_Policy_Language_FINAL.pdf
• ARL
SPEC
Kit
on
Research
Data
Management
Services
(in
collaboraBon
with
JHU,
data
presently
being
collected)
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
28. What
comes
next?
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
29. Emerging
research
data
services
• A
complete
suite
to
match
the
emerging
research
needs
• Five
person
Data
Services
Leadership
Team
for
strategy,
faculty
advisory
group
expected
to
happen
soon
• Data
management
as
a
useful
cornerstone
at
Bmes
• Other
areas:
– GIS
(currently
have
two
FTEs)
– StaBsBcal
consulBng
(just
hired
new
FTE,
searching
for
second
now)
– Data
acquisiBon
(just
hired
new
FTE)
– Metadata
consulBng
(just
restructured,
shising
now)
– Data
archiving?
Data
mining?
Data
wrangling?
Data
modeling?
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
30. Staffing
these
emerging
services
• Retraining
• Reframing
of
posiBons
• Offering
job
share
opportuniBes
for
people
to
develop
skills
and
experience
in
new
areas
• Fresh
hires,
including
non-‐tradiBonal
(ie.
Domain
PhDs)
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
31. Core
team
composiBon
Name
Title
Training
Percent
Time
Area
of
Focus
Andrew
Head
of
MLIS
Full-‐Bme
Management,
planning,
Sallans
Strategic
Data
MSMIT
IT,
budgeBng
IniBaBves
Sherry
Lake
Senior
Data
MLIS
Full-‐Bme
Planning,
programming,
Consultant
storage,
metadata
Bill
Corey
Data
MLIS
Full-‐Bme
Policy,
ownership,
Consultant
metadata
Andrea
Health
MLIS
4
hours
per
Clinical
research,
IRBs
Denton
Sciences
Data
week
Consultant
Ricky
Data
PhD
Half-‐Bme
ScienBfic
data,
methods,
PaJerson
Consultant
Astronomy
funded
research
Summer
MLIS
Full-‐Bme
for
Project
based
interns
10
weeks
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
32. Ongoing
struggles…
• How
do
we
involve
the
broader
Library
staff?
• In
overall
Library
services,
what
can
we
stop
as
we
shis
into
these
new
areas
of
focus?
• Beyond
our
culture,
how
do
we
persuade
our
users
to
see
the
Library
differently?
• CommunicaBon
about
exisBng
efforts
and
management
of
expectaBons
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
33. Closing
points
• Change
in
perspec=ve:
This
can
be
a
great
role
for
the
Library,
but
it
requires
change
and
openness
to
doing
things
differently
and
acquiring
different
skills
• Deeper
involvement
in
research:
SupporBng
researchers
as
they
“acquire,
create,
use,
manage,
and
preserve”
data
demands
deeper
involvement
in
the
research
process
• Collabora=on
and
partnerships:
success
in
this
area
depends
upon
the
ability
to
effecBvely
coordinate
services
with
other
parts
of
the
research
process
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.
34. QuesBons?
Contact:
Andrew
Sallans
als9q@virginia.edu
TwiJer:
@asallans
CreaBve
Commons
License
”Aligning
library
services
with
emerging
research
data
needs",
4/19/13
by
Andrew
L.
Sallans
is
licensed
under
a
CreaBve
Commons
AJribuBon-‐ShareAlike
3.0
Unported
License.