Rt i timeline
โข
0 likesโข30 views
This document provides a timeline for implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) in elementary schools. It outlines the three tiers of RTI: Tier 1 involves high-quality classroom instruction and screening; Tier 2 includes targeted small group interventions; and Tier 3 consists of individualized intensive interventions and a potential special education evaluation. The timeline also discusses identifying students for RTI using assessments, monitoring student progress, and ensuring ethical practices such as properly training teachers and involving parents.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
A multi tiered approach to instruction presentation
This document outlines a multi-tiered approach to instruction and intervention at Mountain Brook schools. It describes three tiers of support: Tier I is core instruction for all students, Tier II provides targeted small group instruction for students identified as at-risk, and Tier III involves intensive individualized interventions. The Student Support Team is responsible for determining student needs, monitoring progress, and making data-based decisions to maximize outcomes for students receiving Tier II and III support. A variety of screening, assessment, and progress monitoring tools are used to identify student needs and measure response to intervention.
Rti Fact Meeting 2 10
This document discusses Response to Intervention (RtI), a multi-tiered approach used to identify students who need academic or behavioral support. It utilizes universal screening, progress monitoring, and evidence-based interventions. There are three tiers - Tier 1 focuses on quality classroom instruction for all students. Tier 2 provides targeted interventions for students at risk of failure. Tier 3 involves intensive interventions, often including special education services, for students who need the most support. The goal is to meet the needs of all students through a highly integrated, data-driven system.
Using assessment to support the curriculum
Using Assessment that Support the Curriculum
How do I link curriculum to assessment?
Assessment for children is a critical piece of the puzzle. Curriculum, standards and assessment join together to help you provide the best learning experiences for children. Practitioners should assess childrenโs progress on the curriculum content that is presented to children. The information teachers gather about childrenโs progress helps determine how to design the classroom, the kinds of experiences, and the content that will help children learn new skills. Regular (or ongoing) assessment gives you the information you need for lesson planning and helps you create stimulating learning environments for children.
Assessment
The document discusses different types of assessment: assessments for learning, assessments as learning, and assessments of learning. Assessments for learning are designed by teachers to help students progress and provide feedback. Assessments as learning encourage student involvement through techniques like self-assessment. Assessments of learning check student achievement against learning outcomes and are used for grading. The purpose of assessment is to identify student strengths and weaknesses, motivate learning, and provide feedback to students and teachers.
Diagnostic evaluatiion
This document discusses diagnostic evaluation in education. It defines diagnostic evaluation as a form of pre-assessment that allows teachers to determine students' strengths, weaknesses, knowledge and skills before instruction. The purpose is to diagnose learning difficulties and guide lesson planning. Diagnostic evaluation is more comprehensive than typical evaluations and aims to pinpoint specific errors and underlying causes of problems. It can involve constant observation, analysis of student performance and records, and specially designed diagnostic techniques. Features include focusing instruction on topics students need to learn, examining individual profiles, analyzing learning difficulties intensively, and providing information to individualize instruction.
Reporting Test Results to Parents
The document discusses test development and evaluation reporting for a B.Ed program. It covers principles of reporting test results to parents, including using clear language and explaining scores. The purposes of reporting are to recognize student achievement, assist in identifying student potential, enable parental support, and help parents understand student strengths and weaknesses. Reporting methods can include parent-teacher conferences, written reports, parent meetings, and newsletters.
Unit-I-Uses-of-Educational-assessment.docx
This document discusses the uses of educational assessment. It states that assessment drives instruction by informing teachers what students know and still need to learn. Assessment also drives student learning by influencing what and how they study. Additionally, assessment informs students of their progress and helps teachers improve their practice by reflecting on student results. The conclusion emphasizes that the primary purposes of assessment are to enhance student learning and improve teaching methods.
DEPED Order no. 8, s. 2015
This document outlines guidelines for classroom assessment in the Philippine K-12 Basic Education Program. It discusses the purposes and types of classroom assessment, including formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment is used to track student progress, promote self-reflection, and inform instruction, while summative assessment measures if learning standards have been met. The document also describes the different components that should be assessed, such as content standards, performance standards, and learning competencies. A variety of assessment methods are recommended for use in the classroom at different stages of the learning process.
Recommended
A multi tiered approach to instruction presentation
This document outlines a multi-tiered approach to instruction and intervention at Mountain Brook schools. It describes three tiers of support: Tier I is core instruction for all students, Tier II provides targeted small group instruction for students identified as at-risk, and Tier III involves intensive individualized interventions. The Student Support Team is responsible for determining student needs, monitoring progress, and making data-based decisions to maximize outcomes for students receiving Tier II and III support. A variety of screening, assessment, and progress monitoring tools are used to identify student needs and measure response to intervention.
Rti Fact Meeting 2 10
This document discusses Response to Intervention (RtI), a multi-tiered approach used to identify students who need academic or behavioral support. It utilizes universal screening, progress monitoring, and evidence-based interventions. There are three tiers - Tier 1 focuses on quality classroom instruction for all students. Tier 2 provides targeted interventions for students at risk of failure. Tier 3 involves intensive interventions, often including special education services, for students who need the most support. The goal is to meet the needs of all students through a highly integrated, data-driven system.
Using assessment to support the curriculum
Using Assessment that Support the Curriculum
How do I link curriculum to assessment?
Assessment for children is a critical piece of the puzzle. Curriculum, standards and assessment join together to help you provide the best learning experiences for children. Practitioners should assess childrenโs progress on the curriculum content that is presented to children. The information teachers gather about childrenโs progress helps determine how to design the classroom, the kinds of experiences, and the content that will help children learn new skills. Regular (or ongoing) assessment gives you the information you need for lesson planning and helps you create stimulating learning environments for children.
Assessment
The document discusses different types of assessment: assessments for learning, assessments as learning, and assessments of learning. Assessments for learning are designed by teachers to help students progress and provide feedback. Assessments as learning encourage student involvement through techniques like self-assessment. Assessments of learning check student achievement against learning outcomes and are used for grading. The purpose of assessment is to identify student strengths and weaknesses, motivate learning, and provide feedback to students and teachers.
Diagnostic evaluatiion
This document discusses diagnostic evaluation in education. It defines diagnostic evaluation as a form of pre-assessment that allows teachers to determine students' strengths, weaknesses, knowledge and skills before instruction. The purpose is to diagnose learning difficulties and guide lesson planning. Diagnostic evaluation is more comprehensive than typical evaluations and aims to pinpoint specific errors and underlying causes of problems. It can involve constant observation, analysis of student performance and records, and specially designed diagnostic techniques. Features include focusing instruction on topics students need to learn, examining individual profiles, analyzing learning difficulties intensively, and providing information to individualize instruction.
Reporting Test Results to Parents
The document discusses test development and evaluation reporting for a B.Ed program. It covers principles of reporting test results to parents, including using clear language and explaining scores. The purposes of reporting are to recognize student achievement, assist in identifying student potential, enable parental support, and help parents understand student strengths and weaknesses. Reporting methods can include parent-teacher conferences, written reports, parent meetings, and newsletters.
Unit-I-Uses-of-Educational-assessment.docx
This document discusses the uses of educational assessment. It states that assessment drives instruction by informing teachers what students know and still need to learn. Assessment also drives student learning by influencing what and how they study. Additionally, assessment informs students of their progress and helps teachers improve their practice by reflecting on student results. The conclusion emphasizes that the primary purposes of assessment are to enhance student learning and improve teaching methods.
DEPED Order no. 8, s. 2015
This document outlines guidelines for classroom assessment in the Philippine K-12 Basic Education Program. It discusses the purposes and types of classroom assessment, including formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment is used to track student progress, promote self-reflection, and inform instruction, while summative assessment measures if learning standards have been met. The document also describes the different components that should be assessed, such as content standards, performance standards, and learning competencies. A variety of assessment methods are recommended for use in the classroom at different stages of the learning process.
Formative Evaluation
Formative evaluation aims to provide feedback during instruction to improve teaching and learning. It involves regularly assessing student understanding of topics as they are taught, providing feedback to students on their progress, and informing teachers on the effectiveness of their instructional methods. The feedback from formative evaluation helps teachers modify their lessons to better meet student needs and helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses to improve their learning. Some key aspects of formative evaluation include dividing subject content into logical units, assessing student understanding after each unit, and using the results to provide reinforcement or remedial support.
Rec3 mod1.1 attachment
The document discusses the primary purposes of educational assessment: screening, progress monitoring, diagnostic, and outcome. Screening assessments are administered to all students early in the year to identify those needing additional support. Progress monitoring assessments are given frequently to students receiving interventions to determine if instruction is effective. Diagnostic assessments provide an in-depth profile of student strengths and weaknesses. Outcome assessments measure performance against grade-level standards to evaluate learning and make decisions about students. High-quality assessments provide feedback to students and teachers and guide future instruction.
CQI through assessing LO
The document discusses the importance of continual quality improvement (CQI) through assessing learning outcomes in education. It outlines UPSI's experience implementing outcome-based education, which focuses on measuring if students achieve intended learning outcomes. Assessing outcomes opens a window to improve the learning cycle for management, faculty, teachers and students. CQI is about ensuring quality but also having a large impact. Institutions must choose whether to actively do CQI through outcome assessment or regret not improving later. The document provides examples of how UPSI assesses outcomes at the course, program and institutional level to guide CQI efforts.
Data team process blank
This document outlines a 3-step data team process for analyzing student assessment results: 1) collect and chart assessment data on student performance, 2) analyze strengths/errors to identify next steps and monitoring tools for different student groups, 3) develop a goal statement and monitoring plan to improve the percentage of proficient students. The process involves tracking various student performance metrics and determining instructional practices and supports needed for proficient, nearly proficient, low performing, and students needing extensive support.
RtI Overview
This document provides an overview of Response to Intervention (RtI) for educators. RtI is a framework that uses data-driven instruction, collaboration between teachers, and increasing levels of support for students who are struggling. It has multiple tiers, with Tier 1 being core instruction for all students, Tier 2 being supplemental interventions for students needing more support, and Tier 3 involving intensive interventions. The goal is to help all students succeed through high-quality teaching, interventions matched to student needs, progress monitoring, and problem-solving collaboration between educators.
Final project 2
The document outlines a proposed tier 2 behavioral intervention program called the Social/Emotional Learning Skills Class. It discusses problems with the current system, goals of providing clearer intervention processes and a specific behavior improvement class. A logic model is presented outlining inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. Evaluation questions are proposed to analyze decreases in misbehavior and increases in academic results after enrollment. Preliminary findings suggest a reduction in measures like suspensions, detentions and behavioral incidents with potential positive effects on GPA.
Gcps intervention form
This document outlines interventions for a student over multiple years. It includes the student's name, grade level, focus areas of reading, writing, and math. Two interventions are described along with their setting, instructional approach, frequency and targeted skill. Progress is recorded weekly for 6-8 weeks. Next steps are determined and can include continuing interventions, modifying them, or moving the student between tiers. The form is completed by a teacher who describes the student's annual progress.
Assess Pupil Progress Pshe
The document discusses assessing pupil progress in PSHE and SEAL using a plan, do, review cycle. It involves collecting perceptions from staff, pupils, and parents on skills. Targets are set for a whole-school focus, such as empathy, and progress is monitored. The cycle then evaluates impact, identifies new priorities, and plans whole-school approaches for the next term. Successful assessment of PSHE uses a planned whole-school approach, regular pupil participation, inclusion of all abilities, and valuing individual personalities.
Assessment (11)
The document discusses different types of assessment including formative and summative assessments. It provides examples of formative assessments like journals, quizzes, and portfolios that are used during instruction. Summative assessments are given after learning is completed, like exams. The document also discusses using rubrics for assessment, which describe performance expectations. Rubrics can be holistic or analytic and have benefits for both instructors and students. Steps for developing effective rubrics are outlined.
CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION(CCE)
CCE was made mandatory in National Policy on Education,1986 (NPE 1986) to introduce Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in schools as an important step of examination reform and for the qualitative improvement in the education system.
Ed103_powerpoint
This document discusses common grading problems and proposes solutions. It addresses issues like grade inflation, questionable grading practices, and the use of zeroes. Specifically, it recommends prioritizing more comprehensive evidence and evidence related to important learning goals when averaging scores. It also states that zeroes do not accurately reflect learning and that behavioral issues are separate from academic achievement. The document provides guidance on establishing an effective grading system to avoid common problems in assessing student performance.
Assessment and evaluation
Assessment systematically collects data to monitor student learning and achievement, while evaluation is a judgment of whether intended outcomes were met. Assessment determines what students learned, how they learned, and their approach to learning. There are several types of assessment: diagnostic assesses prior knowledge; formative is incorporated during instruction to adjust teaching and motivate students; and summative evaluates learning periodically and program effectiveness. Both formative and summative assessments are important for a balanced system that guides instruction and measures achievement.
Obe
Outcome based education focuses on measuring student progress based on whether they achieve learning outcomes and mastery of skills, rather than comparing them to other students. The curriculum is designed around defined learning outcomes, while teachers are responsible for lesson plans and helping students develop necessary study skills. Grading is based on students demonstrating they meet criteria for each outcome, rather than percentages or curves. Supporters believe this approach reduces disadvantages of standardized testing and allows more independent learning tailored to each student's skill level. However, critics argue it can be difficult for teachers to manage individualized plans and assess varying criteria for large class sizes.
Asha technology ppt
Formative evaluation occurs during instruction to provide feedback on student learning and areas for improvement. It identifies errors, misconceptions, and weaknesses through teacher-made tests and observations. Summative evaluation takes place at the end of a course to determine if instructional goals were achieved and assign grades based on achievement tests, performances, and final projects. While formative evaluation is ongoing and flexible, summative evaluation makes final judgments on student mastery and the success of the overall program.
Leadership for RtI
Dr. Denise Kern discusses Response to Intervention (RTI) and leadership. She suggests focusing on relationships, then innovating, inspiring, inquiring, and investing in students individually. Kern outlines a three-tiered RTI process used at JRES, where teachers first meet to discuss early intervention strategies at Tier I. If unsuccessful, they advance to Tier II with administration to review data and strategies. For Tier III, a vertical RTI committee meets to analyze responses and data for possible referral. Kern emphasizes taking care of people, saying yes, and preventing stupid to lead effectively.
Chap 15
The document discusses various methods for grading and reporting student progress. It begins by outlining the main purposes of grading systems, which include instructional use, reporting to parents, and administrative/guidance functions. It then describes several common grading systems like traditional letter grades, pass/fail, checklists of objectives, letters to parents, portfolios, and parent-teacher conferences. For each system, it provides details on how the system works and potential advantages and disadvantages. The document concludes by providing guidelines for developing effective grading and reporting systems and conducting productive parent-teacher conferences.
Formative and Summative Assessment Dr. Grant
The document discusses formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment involves gathering information during instruction to help teachers and students adjust teaching and learning, while summative assessment evaluates student learning after instruction. Formative assessment provides feedback to help students improve, while summative assessment measures achievement for accountability purposes. Both have important roles to play in a comprehensive assessment system.
Intervention Powerpoint
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered approach used to identify students who may need learning or behavioral support. It begins with high-quality classroom instruction and universal screening of all students. Students who struggle receive interventions of increasing intensity, and their progress is closely monitored to determine the best support. The approach uses tiered levels of instruction, with Tier 1 focusing on quality classroom teaching, Tier 2 providing small group interventions, and Tier 3 involving individualized support. The goal is to accelerate student learning through interventions based on their response to instruction.
Role of Assessment in Instructional Decision -Kaye
This document discusses different types of assessments used at various stages of instruction - placement/diagnostic assessments before instruction to determine students' entry behaviors and weaknesses, formative assessments during instruction to monitor progress and check if objectives are being achieved, and summative assessments after instruction to determine if students have mastered the objectives and skills required. It provides examples of tools that can be used for each type of assessment, from pre-tests and interviews for placement, to observations, homework, and student feedback for formative, to exams, projects, and course evaluations for summative. The assessments are used to improve instruction, plan future activities, and assign grades or recognize student performance.
rti-presentation-1224745879453762-9
RTI is a multi-tiered approach to providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs through frequent progress monitoring and data-informed decisions. It involves three tiers of increasingly intensive instruction, with 80% of students receiving core instruction in Tier I, 15% receiving targeted interventions in Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions in Tier 3. The classroom teacher's role includes universal screening, differentiating Tier I instruction, monitoring student progress, implementing Tier 2 interventions, and collaborating within the problem-solving team on intervention planning and student progress.
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pdf
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered system of support for providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs in order to improve learning for all students. It involves three tiers of intervention with increasing intensities. Tier 1 involves quality classroom instruction for all students with progress monitoring. Tier 2 provides supplemental instruction for students not progressing adequately in Tier 1 in small groups. Tier 3 includes the most intensive, individualized interventions for students not responding to Tier 2. The goal of RTI is to prevent academic problems by closing skill gaps early through interventions to determine the need for special education services.
Response To Intervention Presentation
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered system of support for providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs in order to improve learning for all students. It involves three tiers of intervention with increasing levels of intensity, with 80% of students receiving core instruction at Tier 1, 15% receiving supplemental interventions at Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions at Tier 3. The goals of RTI include preventing academic problems by addressing skill gaps early and determining eligibility for special education. Data on student progress is collected throughout the tiers to make decisions about instruction and intervention.
More Related Content
What's hot
Formative Evaluation
Formative evaluation aims to provide feedback during instruction to improve teaching and learning. It involves regularly assessing student understanding of topics as they are taught, providing feedback to students on their progress, and informing teachers on the effectiveness of their instructional methods. The feedback from formative evaluation helps teachers modify their lessons to better meet student needs and helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses to improve their learning. Some key aspects of formative evaluation include dividing subject content into logical units, assessing student understanding after each unit, and using the results to provide reinforcement or remedial support.
Rec3 mod1.1 attachment
The document discusses the primary purposes of educational assessment: screening, progress monitoring, diagnostic, and outcome. Screening assessments are administered to all students early in the year to identify those needing additional support. Progress monitoring assessments are given frequently to students receiving interventions to determine if instruction is effective. Diagnostic assessments provide an in-depth profile of student strengths and weaknesses. Outcome assessments measure performance against grade-level standards to evaluate learning and make decisions about students. High-quality assessments provide feedback to students and teachers and guide future instruction.
CQI through assessing LO
The document discusses the importance of continual quality improvement (CQI) through assessing learning outcomes in education. It outlines UPSI's experience implementing outcome-based education, which focuses on measuring if students achieve intended learning outcomes. Assessing outcomes opens a window to improve the learning cycle for management, faculty, teachers and students. CQI is about ensuring quality but also having a large impact. Institutions must choose whether to actively do CQI through outcome assessment or regret not improving later. The document provides examples of how UPSI assesses outcomes at the course, program and institutional level to guide CQI efforts.
Data team process blank
This document outlines a 3-step data team process for analyzing student assessment results: 1) collect and chart assessment data on student performance, 2) analyze strengths/errors to identify next steps and monitoring tools for different student groups, 3) develop a goal statement and monitoring plan to improve the percentage of proficient students. The process involves tracking various student performance metrics and determining instructional practices and supports needed for proficient, nearly proficient, low performing, and students needing extensive support.
RtI Overview
This document provides an overview of Response to Intervention (RtI) for educators. RtI is a framework that uses data-driven instruction, collaboration between teachers, and increasing levels of support for students who are struggling. It has multiple tiers, with Tier 1 being core instruction for all students, Tier 2 being supplemental interventions for students needing more support, and Tier 3 involving intensive interventions. The goal is to help all students succeed through high-quality teaching, interventions matched to student needs, progress monitoring, and problem-solving collaboration between educators.
Final project 2
The document outlines a proposed tier 2 behavioral intervention program called the Social/Emotional Learning Skills Class. It discusses problems with the current system, goals of providing clearer intervention processes and a specific behavior improvement class. A logic model is presented outlining inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. Evaluation questions are proposed to analyze decreases in misbehavior and increases in academic results after enrollment. Preliminary findings suggest a reduction in measures like suspensions, detentions and behavioral incidents with potential positive effects on GPA.
Gcps intervention form
This document outlines interventions for a student over multiple years. It includes the student's name, grade level, focus areas of reading, writing, and math. Two interventions are described along with their setting, instructional approach, frequency and targeted skill. Progress is recorded weekly for 6-8 weeks. Next steps are determined and can include continuing interventions, modifying them, or moving the student between tiers. The form is completed by a teacher who describes the student's annual progress.
Assess Pupil Progress Pshe
The document discusses assessing pupil progress in PSHE and SEAL using a plan, do, review cycle. It involves collecting perceptions from staff, pupils, and parents on skills. Targets are set for a whole-school focus, such as empathy, and progress is monitored. The cycle then evaluates impact, identifies new priorities, and plans whole-school approaches for the next term. Successful assessment of PSHE uses a planned whole-school approach, regular pupil participation, inclusion of all abilities, and valuing individual personalities.
Assessment (11)
The document discusses different types of assessment including formative and summative assessments. It provides examples of formative assessments like journals, quizzes, and portfolios that are used during instruction. Summative assessments are given after learning is completed, like exams. The document also discusses using rubrics for assessment, which describe performance expectations. Rubrics can be holistic or analytic and have benefits for both instructors and students. Steps for developing effective rubrics are outlined.
CONTINUOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION(CCE)
CCE was made mandatory in National Policy on Education,1986 (NPE 1986) to introduce Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in schools as an important step of examination reform and for the qualitative improvement in the education system.
Ed103_powerpoint
This document discusses common grading problems and proposes solutions. It addresses issues like grade inflation, questionable grading practices, and the use of zeroes. Specifically, it recommends prioritizing more comprehensive evidence and evidence related to important learning goals when averaging scores. It also states that zeroes do not accurately reflect learning and that behavioral issues are separate from academic achievement. The document provides guidance on establishing an effective grading system to avoid common problems in assessing student performance.
Assessment and evaluation
Assessment systematically collects data to monitor student learning and achievement, while evaluation is a judgment of whether intended outcomes were met. Assessment determines what students learned, how they learned, and their approach to learning. There are several types of assessment: diagnostic assesses prior knowledge; formative is incorporated during instruction to adjust teaching and motivate students; and summative evaluates learning periodically and program effectiveness. Both formative and summative assessments are important for a balanced system that guides instruction and measures achievement.
Obe
Outcome based education focuses on measuring student progress based on whether they achieve learning outcomes and mastery of skills, rather than comparing them to other students. The curriculum is designed around defined learning outcomes, while teachers are responsible for lesson plans and helping students develop necessary study skills. Grading is based on students demonstrating they meet criteria for each outcome, rather than percentages or curves. Supporters believe this approach reduces disadvantages of standardized testing and allows more independent learning tailored to each student's skill level. However, critics argue it can be difficult for teachers to manage individualized plans and assess varying criteria for large class sizes.
Asha technology ppt
Formative evaluation occurs during instruction to provide feedback on student learning and areas for improvement. It identifies errors, misconceptions, and weaknesses through teacher-made tests and observations. Summative evaluation takes place at the end of a course to determine if instructional goals were achieved and assign grades based on achievement tests, performances, and final projects. While formative evaluation is ongoing and flexible, summative evaluation makes final judgments on student mastery and the success of the overall program.
Leadership for RtI
Dr. Denise Kern discusses Response to Intervention (RTI) and leadership. She suggests focusing on relationships, then innovating, inspiring, inquiring, and investing in students individually. Kern outlines a three-tiered RTI process used at JRES, where teachers first meet to discuss early intervention strategies at Tier I. If unsuccessful, they advance to Tier II with administration to review data and strategies. For Tier III, a vertical RTI committee meets to analyze responses and data for possible referral. Kern emphasizes taking care of people, saying yes, and preventing stupid to lead effectively.
Chap 15
The document discusses various methods for grading and reporting student progress. It begins by outlining the main purposes of grading systems, which include instructional use, reporting to parents, and administrative/guidance functions. It then describes several common grading systems like traditional letter grades, pass/fail, checklists of objectives, letters to parents, portfolios, and parent-teacher conferences. For each system, it provides details on how the system works and potential advantages and disadvantages. The document concludes by providing guidelines for developing effective grading and reporting systems and conducting productive parent-teacher conferences.
Formative and Summative Assessment Dr. Grant
The document discusses formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment involves gathering information during instruction to help teachers and students adjust teaching and learning, while summative assessment evaluates student learning after instruction. Formative assessment provides feedback to help students improve, while summative assessment measures achievement for accountability purposes. Both have important roles to play in a comprehensive assessment system.
Intervention Powerpoint
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered approach used to identify students who may need learning or behavioral support. It begins with high-quality classroom instruction and universal screening of all students. Students who struggle receive interventions of increasing intensity, and their progress is closely monitored to determine the best support. The approach uses tiered levels of instruction, with Tier 1 focusing on quality classroom teaching, Tier 2 providing small group interventions, and Tier 3 involving individualized support. The goal is to accelerate student learning through interventions based on their response to instruction.
Role of Assessment in Instructional Decision -Kaye
This document discusses different types of assessments used at various stages of instruction - placement/diagnostic assessments before instruction to determine students' entry behaviors and weaknesses, formative assessments during instruction to monitor progress and check if objectives are being achieved, and summative assessments after instruction to determine if students have mastered the objectives and skills required. It provides examples of tools that can be used for each type of assessment, from pre-tests and interviews for placement, to observations, homework, and student feedback for formative, to exams, projects, and course evaluations for summative. The assessments are used to improve instruction, plan future activities, and assign grades or recognize student performance.
What's hot (19)
Role of Assessment in Instructional Decision -Kaye
Role of Assessment in Instructional Decision -Kaye
ย
Similar to Rt i timeline
rti-presentation-1224745879453762-9
RTI is a multi-tiered approach to providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs through frequent progress monitoring and data-informed decisions. It involves three tiers of increasingly intensive instruction, with 80% of students receiving core instruction in Tier I, 15% receiving targeted interventions in Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions in Tier 3. The classroom teacher's role includes universal screening, differentiating Tier I instruction, monitoring student progress, implementing Tier 2 interventions, and collaborating within the problem-solving team on intervention planning and student progress.
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pdf
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered system of support for providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs in order to improve learning for all students. It involves three tiers of intervention with increasing intensities. Tier 1 involves quality classroom instruction for all students with progress monitoring. Tier 2 provides supplemental instruction for students not progressing adequately in Tier 1 in small groups. Tier 3 includes the most intensive, individualized interventions for students not responding to Tier 2. The goal of RTI is to prevent academic problems by closing skill gaps early through interventions to determine the need for special education services.
Response To Intervention Presentation
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered system of support for providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs in order to improve learning for all students. It involves three tiers of intervention with increasing levels of intensity, with 80% of students receiving core instruction at Tier 1, 15% receiving supplemental interventions at Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions at Tier 3. The goals of RTI include preventing academic problems by addressing skill gaps early and determining eligibility for special education. Data on student progress is collected throughout the tiers to make decisions about instruction and intervention.
Response To Intervention Presentation
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered system of support for providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student needs in order to improve learning for all students. It involves three tiers of intervention with increasing levels of intensity, with 80% of students receiving core instruction at Tier 1, 15% receiving supplemental interventions at Tier 2, and 5% receiving intensive interventions at Tier 3. The goals of RTI include preventing academic problems by addressing skill gaps early through differentiated instruction and targeted interventions, and determining eligibility for special education. Progress is closely monitored at all tiers to determine students' responses to interventions.
RTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
This document provides information about Response to Intervention (RTI) including:
- RTI is a multi-tiered system of support that provides increasingly intensive interventions based on student need. Tier 1 involves core classroom instruction, Tier 2 involves supplemental interventions, and Tier 3 involves intensive individualized interventions.
- Effective Tier 1 instruction is critical and involves differentiated instruction, engaging students, using standardized curricula, and creating a positive learning environment.
- The RTI process involves universal screening, progress monitoring, using data to make instructional decisions, and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. Key components are screening, multi-level instruction, progress monitoring, and data-based decision making.
Curriculum portfolio on best practices
This portfolio summarizes best practices in special education assessment and intervention. It discusses two key issues: Response to Intervention (RTI) and avoiding disproportionality in special education assessment. RTI uses multi-tiered interventions and assessments to identify student needs early. This avoids misplacing students in special education without adequate general education supports. The portfolio is intended to provide an exemplar for schools to reference in improving their special education practices and assessments. It suggests training practitioners in special education and general education to validate assessment data and avoid erroneous special education placements.
Grading and reporting By: leo domondon
The document discusses guidelines for an effective grading system in K-12 education in the Philippines. It outlines the purposes of grading as enhancing learning, reporting to parents, and administrative uses. It describes different types of grading systems and levels of assessment including knowledge, skills, understanding, and performance. Students are assessed on a level of proficiency from beginning to advanced based on their demonstration of learning standards. Guidelines are provided for developing fair grading procedures, conducting parent-teacher conferences, and determining student proficiency levels and remediation needs.
Danielson 3 D Assessment
Formative assessments provide information during instruction to help adjust teaching, while summative assessments evaluate learning at the end of a period through exams and grades. Students should be involved in self-assessment and monitoring their work against standards. Effective teachers actively elicit diagnostic information from students, provide timely feedback, and ensure students understand evaluation criteria.
Rti ppt
RtI is a multi-tiered approach to providing interventions to struggling students with increasing intensity of support. It involves universal screening, progress monitoring, and using student data to make instructional decisions. All staff share responsibility for instruction. Students receive research-based interventions in three tiers - high quality classroom instruction (Tier 1), small group interventions (Tier 2), and intensive individualized support (Tier 3). The goal is to improve student achievement through early intervention and differentiated support.
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pptx
Response to Instruction (RTI) is a multi-tiered framework that uses core instruction, assessment, and intervention to increase student achievement and reduce behavior problems. It involves all school staff, parents, and sometimes outside providers working collaboratively to identify student needs and provide targeted academic and behavioral interventions. Student progress is monitored through data to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and make decisions about future instruction. The goal is to provide early and well-matched support to struggling students in order to prevent academic and behavioral issues.
Pyramid Of Intervention
The document describes a three-tiered pyramid of intervention supports and services for students. Tier I involves school-wide core instruction and interventions for all students. Tier II includes targeted small group instruction for students identified as at-risk. Tier III consists of intensive individualized interventions and specialized services for students who do not respond to Tier I or II supports. The pyramid model is intended to provide increasingly focused and intensive supports to help all students achieve academic and behavioral standards.
Rti powerpoint
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multitiered approach to providing high-quality instruction and interventions that are matched to student needs. It begins with screening all students to identify those struggling, who receive interventions with increasing intensity across tiers to accelerate learning. Student progress is closely monitored to determine the effectiveness of instruction and need for further support. RTI provides a well-integrated system of instruction and intervention informed by student outcome data.
Week 03- Response to Intervention Timeline.pptx
Response to intervention for the middle school students is explained in the ppt. Besides that, what are evaluations and assessments. The tier system of the RTI is also explained for the middle students.
teaching material
This document provides information about physics educational assessment. It discusses the meaning of assessment, measurement, and evaluation. It explains that assessment involves obtaining information about learning objectives, while evaluation determines if a student meets a criteria. The document also outlines types of assessment, including summative assessment which measures learning after instruction, and formative assessment which guides ongoing learning. It notes assessment should be planned based on its purpose of learning, as learning, or of learning. The document aims to help teachers understand principles of effective student assessment.
Chapter 3 elem rdg
This document discusses current trends in assessment for teaching reading in elementary schools. It covers the purpose of assessment, different types of formative and summative assessments, the impact of standards-based education reforms like No Child Left Behind, and the use of both formal standardized tests and informal alternative assessments. The document also addresses how assessment data can be used to guide intervention strategies to improve student learning.
Rti response to intervention ny
This powerpoint is a great tool to use to introduce RTI and best practices for the three tier approach. Citations are included.
Action-Research-Proposal-Presentation-Coupon-Challenge.pptx
The document proposes a coupon challenge intervention to address low submission rates of learners' outputs in a Grade 10 class which could affect their academic performance. The intervention aims to encourage on-time, complete, and accurate submission of assignments through a points-based coupon system where earned coupons can be used to purchase prizes. Data on submission rates before and during the intervention will be collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests to determine if there is a significant difference. The research aims to benefit learners, parents, and the school.
Assessments in literacy
This document outlines a framework for assessing and planning programs for students experiencing significant difficulties in reading. It consists of a 3-step process: 1) Classroom teachers collect information and develop intervention plans, 2) if difficulties continue, a team is established to create expanded intervention plans or arrange formal assessments, and 3) formal assessments are reviewed to create personalized program plans, which are implemented and monitored for student success. The overall goal is to determine the most effective instruction and ongoing support for students struggling with reading through classroom-based and formal assessments.
Roles-of-assessment-in-instructional-decision.pptx
Assessment plays several important roles in instructional decision making. Formative, diagnostic, and summative assessments provide teachers with information to make placement, evaluation, and diagnosis decisions that influence instruction. Formative assessment during instruction monitors student learning and provides feedback. Diagnostic assessment identifies learning difficulties and informs individualized instruction. Summative assessment evaluates learning at the end of a period. Together, various assessment methods and data-informed decisions help teachers enhance instruction.
kto12classroomassessmentppt-150405021132-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
The document discusses principles of assessment in the K-12 classroom. It outlines 7 principles: 1) assessment should be aligned with objectives and standards, 2) formative assessment should scaffold summative assessment, 3) assessment should become more like instruction, 4) assessment results should be used to help students learn, 5) assessment should not threaten or intimidate students, 6) teachers should encourage a learning community to engage in assessment, and 7) assessment is a technical competency. It provides examples of formative assessment techniques and explains the differences between assessment for learning, of learning, and as learning.
Similar to Rt i timeline (20)
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pdf
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pdf
ย
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pptx
rti-13504168274579-phpapp02-121016144848-phpapp02.pptx
ย
Action-Research-Proposal-Presentation-Coupon-Challenge.pptx
Action-Research-Proposal-Presentation-Coupon-Challenge.pptx
ย
Roles-of-assessment-in-instructional-decision.pptx
Roles-of-assessment-in-instructional-decision.pptx
ย
kto12classroomassessmentppt-150405021132-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
kto12classroomassessmentppt-150405021132-conversion-gate01 (1).pdf
ย
Recently uploaded
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience Wahiba Chair Training & Consulting
Wahiba Chair's Talk at the 2024 Learning Ideas Conference. ย
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Ivรกn Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.ย
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
โ What is event processing in MuleSoft?
โ Types of event processing models in Mule 4
โ Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(๐๐๐ ๐๐๐) (๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐)-๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฌ
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ซ:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
BรI TแบฌP Bแป TRแปข TIแบพNG ANH LแปP 9 Cแบข NฤM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NฤM HแปC 2024-2025 - ...
BรI TแบฌP Bแป TRแปข TIแบพNG ANH LแปP 9 Cแบข NฤM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NฤM HแปC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneย
Recently uploaded (20)
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
ย
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
ย
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
ย
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
ย
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
ย
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
ย
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
ย
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
ย
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
ย
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
ย
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
Constructing Your Course Container for Effective Communication
ย
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
ย
BรI TแบฌP Bแป TRแปข TIแบพNG ANH LแปP 9 Cแบข NฤM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NฤM HแปC 2024-2025 - ...
BรI TแบฌP Bแป TRแปข TIแบพNG ANH LแปP 9 Cแบข NฤM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NฤM HแปC 2024-2025 - ...
ย
Rt i timeline
- 1. A TIMELINE for RtI Steven Acevedo 512- Teaching the Exceptional Learner May 27, 2019 Prof. Regina Maldonado Navigating through Response to Intervention for Elementary Schools