[Roundtable panel discussion 2019 april openuped] - Tiberio Feliz Murias

1. ROUND TABLE
Design webinar week
Thursday 18th April 2019
Tiberio Feliz Murias (UNED)

2. HOW DOES EACH EXAMPLE FROM
WEDNESDAY RELATE TO THE QA
FRAMEWORK?
• International framework
• Supranational interests
• Participatory for institutions and companies external
to the university
• External evaluation for funding
• Plurality of cultures and legislations
• Seeking cohesion and progress

3. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF EXTERNAL
STAKEHOLDERS IN THE MOOC DESIGN
PROCESS?
• Experience
• Competence
• Transfer
• Professionalism

4. WHAT ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
GAMIFICATION IN MOOCS? (1)
• Macrolevel (stakeholders and international institutions)
• Management
• Openness
• Transfer
• Mesolevel (HEI)
• Management
• Innovation
• Transfer
• Microlevel (Specific MOOCs)

5. WHAT ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
GAMIFICATION IN MOOCS? (2)
• Microlevel (Specific MOOCs)
• Couse design, as a whole
• Specific actions in the course
• Goals
• Contents
• Activities
• Methodology
• Interactions
• Assessment
• Benefits
• Difficulties

6. WHAT ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
GAMIFICATION IN MOOCS? (3)
• Microlevel (Specific MOOCs)
• Benefits:
• Motivation
• Engagement
• Experience
• Permanence
• Activity
• Satisfaction
• Difficulties:
• Time-Workload
• Frivolity-Academicism

7. SHOULD WE ALWAYS DESIGN FOR
COLLABORATION / SOCIAL
LEARNING? [PATRICIA & ANA]
• We have to consider different:
• Personality traits: sociability
• Learning styles: impulsive or reflective
• Available time
• Type of task

8. DO WE NEED A TAXONOMY OF
TYPES OF MOOCS?
• Several problems:
• Is there a closed taxonomy?
• Could be useful in macro and meso levels
(international and HEI)
• Microlevel better:
• Openness and flexibility at microlevel
• Good design framework

9. See
you!