Air Emission Permitting and Reporting Requirements Under Environmental Lawssbligh0101
The document discusses various air emissions permitting and reporting requirements under US environmental laws. It covers:
1) Permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act for new sources, including best available control technology requirements.
2) Title V operating permit requirements for major sources and other applicable sources.
3) Reporting requirements under laws like the Clean Air Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act. These include emissions reporting, toxic chemical inventory reporting, and other notices.
The data reported by industrial facilities helps communities and emergency response agencies plan for emergencies involving hazardous substances. We can provide the EPA enforcement consulting to assist you with this reporting.
The data reported by industrial facilities helps communities and emergency response agencies plan for emergencies involving hazardous substances. We can provide the EPA enforcement consulting to assist you with this reporting.
This document provides a summary of a 40-hour hazardous waste site training course. The course covers health and safety regulations, hazard recognition and control, monitoring instruments, toxicology, respiratory protection, protective equipment, site entry procedures, decontamination, and safety planning. It is intended to train personnel working at hazardous waste sites to meet OSHA requirements. The course uses a student training handbook to provide overviews of key topics and serve as a reference for developing health and safety programs.
ERA involves assessing environmental and health risks through qualitative and quantitative methods. It includes human health risk assessment and ecological risk assessment. The ERA process identifies hazards, evaluates exposure levels and consequences, and examines uncertainties. Risk management then evaluates risk acceptability and implements risk reduction measures. Key aspects of ERA include hazard identification, dose-response assessment, dispersion modeling, risk comparison, effective risk communication, and developing emergency response plans to minimize risks to human health and the environment from industrial and other activities.
This document outlines the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program for U.S. Army Garrison Fort Buchanan. The program was developed to comply with Puerto Rico's MS4 permit and address illicit discharges into the storm sewer system. Key aspects of the IDDE program include outfall mapping, catchment investigations, dry and wet weather screening, and procedures for locating and eliminating illicit discharge sources. The goal is to systematically find and remove non-stormwater discharges and prevent future illicit connections to the municipal separate storm sewer system.
The document outlines rules for the manufacture, storage, and import of hazardous chemicals in India from 1989, amended in 1994 and 2000. It establishes procedures and safeguards for handling hazardous chemicals. Key points include requiring notification of major accidents, site registration, safety reporting, onsite emergency plans, data sharing for offsite plans, and rules for chemical imports. Schedules list hazardous chemicals and criteria and authorities' roles for monitoring implementation. The rules aim to manage chemical emergencies by industry and authorities.
The document provides information on emergency preparedness for industrial radiological accidents. It discusses the definition of a radiological accident, potential causes of accidents, types of accidents involving gamma exposure devices and x-ray devices. It emphasizes the importance of emergency planning and preparedness to effectively respond to accidents. Key components of emergency planning discussed include assessing hazards, acquiring emergency equipment, developing written procedures, and training. The document also outlines generic emergency response organizations and responsibilities at various levels. Specific procedures for responding to missing or stolen radioactive sources are presented.
Air Emission Permitting and Reporting Requirements Under Environmental Lawssbligh0101
The document discusses various air emissions permitting and reporting requirements under US environmental laws. It covers:
1) Permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act for new sources, including best available control technology requirements.
2) Title V operating permit requirements for major sources and other applicable sources.
3) Reporting requirements under laws like the Clean Air Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act. These include emissions reporting, toxic chemical inventory reporting, and other notices.
The data reported by industrial facilities helps communities and emergency response agencies plan for emergencies involving hazardous substances. We can provide the EPA enforcement consulting to assist you with this reporting.
The data reported by industrial facilities helps communities and emergency response agencies plan for emergencies involving hazardous substances. We can provide the EPA enforcement consulting to assist you with this reporting.
This document provides a summary of a 40-hour hazardous waste site training course. The course covers health and safety regulations, hazard recognition and control, monitoring instruments, toxicology, respiratory protection, protective equipment, site entry procedures, decontamination, and safety planning. It is intended to train personnel working at hazardous waste sites to meet OSHA requirements. The course uses a student training handbook to provide overviews of key topics and serve as a reference for developing health and safety programs.
ERA involves assessing environmental and health risks through qualitative and quantitative methods. It includes human health risk assessment and ecological risk assessment. The ERA process identifies hazards, evaluates exposure levels and consequences, and examines uncertainties. Risk management then evaluates risk acceptability and implements risk reduction measures. Key aspects of ERA include hazard identification, dose-response assessment, dispersion modeling, risk comparison, effective risk communication, and developing emergency response plans to minimize risks to human health and the environment from industrial and other activities.
This document outlines the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program for U.S. Army Garrison Fort Buchanan. The program was developed to comply with Puerto Rico's MS4 permit and address illicit discharges into the storm sewer system. Key aspects of the IDDE program include outfall mapping, catchment investigations, dry and wet weather screening, and procedures for locating and eliminating illicit discharge sources. The goal is to systematically find and remove non-stormwater discharges and prevent future illicit connections to the municipal separate storm sewer system.
The document outlines rules for the manufacture, storage, and import of hazardous chemicals in India from 1989, amended in 1994 and 2000. It establishes procedures and safeguards for handling hazardous chemicals. Key points include requiring notification of major accidents, site registration, safety reporting, onsite emergency plans, data sharing for offsite plans, and rules for chemical imports. Schedules list hazardous chemicals and criteria and authorities' roles for monitoring implementation. The rules aim to manage chemical emergencies by industry and authorities.
The document provides information on emergency preparedness for industrial radiological accidents. It discusses the definition of a radiological accident, potential causes of accidents, types of accidents involving gamma exposure devices and x-ray devices. It emphasizes the importance of emergency planning and preparedness to effectively respond to accidents. Key components of emergency planning discussed include assessing hazards, acquiring emergency equipment, developing written procedures, and training. The document also outlines generic emergency response organizations and responsibilities at various levels. Specific procedures for responding to missing or stolen radioactive sources are presented.
EPA Report: Minimizing and Managing Potential Impacts of Injection-Induced Se...Marcellus Drilling News
The final version of a report issued by the U.S. EPA on a probably connection between some Class II wastewater injection wells and earthquake activity. The report cannot certify a connection exists, but believes the evidence is strong that such a connection exists.
The Seveso III Directive lays out rules to prevent major industrial accidents involving dangerous substances and limit their consequences. The COMAH Regulations 2015 implement Seveso III in the UK. Key changes in COMAH 2015 include classifying sites based on CLP instead of previous schemes, requiring basic site information to be publicly available electronically, and increased cooperation between COMAH and non-COMAH sites. The anaerobic digestion industry could potentially be impacted if biogas or digestate meet Seveso III classifications as dangerous substances, in which case sites would need to comply with COMAH duties like control measures and emergency response plans.
This document outlines the coordinated emergency response plans and procedures between Georgia state and Chatham County agencies for hurricane preparedness and response. It details the operating conditions that guide preparations and response based on the projected timing of tropical storm force winds. As the storm approaches, emergency operations centers are activated, evacuations are coordinated, and post-landfall recovery is planned to protect lives and property.
The document provides an agenda for a seminar on legal provisions and implementation to prevent major accidents involving hazardous materials (MAH) in India and a comparison with the Seveso II directives. The agenda is divided into three parts: background and definitions of MAH regulations; general and specific obligations and control systems for MAH prevention; and MAH information systems, reporting obligations, and administrative coordination. Key aspects that will be discussed include India's MAH regulations, major accident prevention policies, safety management systems, safety reporting requirements, and gaps in regulations and their implementation in India.
The document summarizes key regulations that govern the petroleum industry in India to promote safety and environmental protection. Several statutory agencies frame rules on issues like import/transport/storage of petroleum, construction of tanks, and safety of workers. Major acts discussed are the Petroleum Act 1934, Explosives Act 1884, Factories Act 1948, and various environmental legislations. The responsibilities of industries include obtaining consents, complying with emission/effluent standards, and ensuring safety of operations.
This document summarizes federal environmental regulations that may affect the commercial printing industry, specifically regarding air requirements under the Clean Air Act. It discusses the EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standards and how nonattainment areas are classified. Printing facilities are considered sources of volatile organic compound emissions, which are precursors to ozone. The document outlines requirements for existing major sources in nonattainment areas to implement Reasonably Available Control Technology. It also discusses new source review permitting requirements for new or modified major sources of air pollution.
This science lab safety review outlines various safety topics including animal, chemical, clothing, electric, eye, fire, hand, and sharp object safety as well as following rules and procedures and not allowing food, drink, or gum in the lab. Proper safety is important when working with animals, chemicals, electricity, flames, sharp objects, and more.
The document contains summaries from multiple students on the accessibility, general safety, fire safety, lab safety, and aesthetics of a building. For general safety, it suggests removing clutter in hallways and locking labs at all times. For fire safety, it recommends installing sprinklers. Overall, it finds that the building is above average for its alert systems and fire extinguishers but lacks sprinklers.
This document provides information on fire safety and fire extinguisher use. It discusses the chemistry of fire, known as the fire tetrahedron, which requires oxygen, fuel, heat, and a chemical chain reaction. It also outlines the four stages of combustion: incipient, smoldering, flaming, and heat. Principles of fire extinction include cooling, smothering, starvation, and stopping the chain reaction. The document also covers fire classes A through D and proper PASS technique for using a fire extinguisher safely. It stresses not fighting a fire unless it is small and conditions are safe.
Microbiology fire safety presentation 2014Ryan Murphy
This document provides guidance on fire safety in a microbiology lab. It outlines procedures for responding to different types of lab fires, including extinguishing small alcohol lamp or benchtop fires, dousing trash can fires with water, removing burning gloves or clothing, and calling for help in dangerous situations. The document emphasizes remaining calm and removing flammable materials from the area of the fire. It directs lab users to ask managers if they are unsure how to respond to a fire and provides contact information for further safety instruction.
This lab safety orientation document outlines emergency procedures and safety equipment for fire, medical emergencies, and chemical spills. It instructs users to call the campus emergency number 4911 first for all emergencies before calling 9-911, and provides contact information for the lab managers. Safety goggles and proper disposal of broken glass are emphasized as important protective equipment. Locations of first aid and eyewash stations are indicated, as well as where to find safety data sheets and information about right-to-know laws regarding hazardous chemicals.
The document discusses responsibilities and components of a safety program for laboratories, clinics, and hospitals. It outlines the responsibilities of employers to establish safety policies and procedures, as well as the responsibilities of employees to follow safety protocols and report any unsafe conditions. Additionally, the document provides guidance on key safety topics like fire safety, chemical safety, and bloodborne pathogens.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) developed a hazard labeling system using diamond-shaped labels to indicate the health, flammability, and reactivity risks of chemicals. Each label section uses a number from 0-4 to rate the risk, with 4 being the most dangerous. Special symbols in the bottom section identify additional hazards like poisons, corrosives, or materials that react with water.
This webinar discussed Tier II reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). EPCRA was established after a deadly chemical release in Bhopal, India to support emergency planning and provide information on chemical hazards. Facilities that store hazardous chemicals above threshold quantities must submit Tier II reports annually by March 1st with details on chemical inventories, locations, hazards and emergency contacts. The webinar covered the major provisions and history of EPCRA, explained what information is required in Tier II reports, and provided an overview of how to complete the reporting process before taking live questions from participants.
The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requires facilities to report information about hazardous and toxic chemicals to federal, state and local emergency response authorities to help communities plan for and respond to chemical emergencies. EPCRA establishes reporting obligations for facilities containing hazardous chemicals over certain thresholds and requires facilities to provide information to support emergency planning and notification of chemical releases. It is administered by the EPA and aims to improve public access to chemical hazard data and involvement in emergency response planning.
The Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 states that Tier II Reports must be submitted annually by March 1st to your State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) and local fire department(s). Each violation of the Tier II Reporting requirements may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
It is important to take the time to carefully review your facility to determine the quantity of chemicals stored onsite and understand if these quantities require reporting via the annual Tier II report.
This webinar will educate attendees on best practices for chemical inventory management. Our expert speaker will address a variety of topics to help you ensure your chemical inventory program is safe and compliant while optimizing for ease, simplicity and cost savings. During this webinar you will learn:
Regulations to watch regarding chemical inventory and management
Organization tactics to optimize for safety and system simplicity
Types of software you can use to improve your program
Case study examples of chemical inventory overhauls and simple tactics you can implement at your organization.
If you are generating hazardous waste, it is important to know the recordkeeping requirements that must be followed according to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). These requirements include maintaining records of waste determinations, manifests, and storage times, as well as documenting employee training and emergency preparedness plans. Adhering to these requirements can help ensure compliance with environmental regulations and prevent potential penalties and liabilities. For more details, check now!
BEM 3701, Hazardous Waste Management 1 Course Learnin.docxaryan532920
BEM 3701, Hazardous Waste Management 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
3. Describe various types of hazardous wastes, their impact on the environment, and respective
environmental control and public health remedies.
4. Evaluate relevant regulatory compliance requirements in the industrial environment.
8. Evaluate safety and health efforts related to hazardous waste workers.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 14:
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility Requirements
Chapter 15:
Incineration of Hazardous Waste
Unit Lesson
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility Requirements
In Unit III, you learned about how hazardous waste is regulated from its creation through its transportation.
Ultimately, our hazardous waste must reach its final destination. It must be treated to make it less hazardous
and/or disposed of in a safe way. RCRA regulations for Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs)
are even more extensive than those for generators and transporters (Pichtel, 2014). These regulations are
found in 40 CFR 264-165 Subparts A through G. “Treatment”, “Storage”, and “Disposal” all have specific
definitions that are covered in 40 CFR 270.2.
Subpart A
Subpart A of the regulations cover general issues, such as exclusions from 40 CFR 264 and 265. There are a
variety of exclusions, including farmers disposing of waste pesticides from his or her own use, a totally
enclosed treatment facility, and a generator accumulating waste on-site. If a facility does not fall under exempt
status as outlined in Subpart A, the facility is subject to Subpart B.
Subpart B
Subpart B covers general facility standards including recordkeeping requirements, personnel requirements,
and safety requirements. TSDFs must obtain a site-specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ID
number. Before any waste can be treated or disposed of, the facility must obtain a thorough chemical analysis
of a sample of the waste. A waste analysis plan (WAP) must outline the process and include information such
as the sampling methods used, the procedures used for testing, and the frequency of waste re-evaluation
(EPA). Subpart B also requires a TSDF to have specific security in place at the facility, including a 24-hr
surveillance system and barriers surrounding the active portion of the facility (Pichtel, 2014). The facility also
must inspect the facility on a regular basis. The frequency of inspection varies with the facility and the type of
equipment used, as well as the likelihood of an incident if a malfunction were to occur. RCRA specifies
inspection frequencies for certain types of TSDF equipment. For example, loading and unloading area should
be inspected daily, and containment buildings should be inspected weekly (Pichtel, 2014).
UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities
(TSDFs) and Incineration of Hazardous Waste
...
EPA Report: Minimizing and Managing Potential Impacts of Injection-Induced Se...Marcellus Drilling News
The final version of a report issued by the U.S. EPA on a probably connection between some Class II wastewater injection wells and earthquake activity. The report cannot certify a connection exists, but believes the evidence is strong that such a connection exists.
The Seveso III Directive lays out rules to prevent major industrial accidents involving dangerous substances and limit their consequences. The COMAH Regulations 2015 implement Seveso III in the UK. Key changes in COMAH 2015 include classifying sites based on CLP instead of previous schemes, requiring basic site information to be publicly available electronically, and increased cooperation between COMAH and non-COMAH sites. The anaerobic digestion industry could potentially be impacted if biogas or digestate meet Seveso III classifications as dangerous substances, in which case sites would need to comply with COMAH duties like control measures and emergency response plans.
This document outlines the coordinated emergency response plans and procedures between Georgia state and Chatham County agencies for hurricane preparedness and response. It details the operating conditions that guide preparations and response based on the projected timing of tropical storm force winds. As the storm approaches, emergency operations centers are activated, evacuations are coordinated, and post-landfall recovery is planned to protect lives and property.
The document provides an agenda for a seminar on legal provisions and implementation to prevent major accidents involving hazardous materials (MAH) in India and a comparison with the Seveso II directives. The agenda is divided into three parts: background and definitions of MAH regulations; general and specific obligations and control systems for MAH prevention; and MAH information systems, reporting obligations, and administrative coordination. Key aspects that will be discussed include India's MAH regulations, major accident prevention policies, safety management systems, safety reporting requirements, and gaps in regulations and their implementation in India.
The document summarizes key regulations that govern the petroleum industry in India to promote safety and environmental protection. Several statutory agencies frame rules on issues like import/transport/storage of petroleum, construction of tanks, and safety of workers. Major acts discussed are the Petroleum Act 1934, Explosives Act 1884, Factories Act 1948, and various environmental legislations. The responsibilities of industries include obtaining consents, complying with emission/effluent standards, and ensuring safety of operations.
This document summarizes federal environmental regulations that may affect the commercial printing industry, specifically regarding air requirements under the Clean Air Act. It discusses the EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standards and how nonattainment areas are classified. Printing facilities are considered sources of volatile organic compound emissions, which are precursors to ozone. The document outlines requirements for existing major sources in nonattainment areas to implement Reasonably Available Control Technology. It also discusses new source review permitting requirements for new or modified major sources of air pollution.
This science lab safety review outlines various safety topics including animal, chemical, clothing, electric, eye, fire, hand, and sharp object safety as well as following rules and procedures and not allowing food, drink, or gum in the lab. Proper safety is important when working with animals, chemicals, electricity, flames, sharp objects, and more.
The document contains summaries from multiple students on the accessibility, general safety, fire safety, lab safety, and aesthetics of a building. For general safety, it suggests removing clutter in hallways and locking labs at all times. For fire safety, it recommends installing sprinklers. Overall, it finds that the building is above average for its alert systems and fire extinguishers but lacks sprinklers.
This document provides information on fire safety and fire extinguisher use. It discusses the chemistry of fire, known as the fire tetrahedron, which requires oxygen, fuel, heat, and a chemical chain reaction. It also outlines the four stages of combustion: incipient, smoldering, flaming, and heat. Principles of fire extinction include cooling, smothering, starvation, and stopping the chain reaction. The document also covers fire classes A through D and proper PASS technique for using a fire extinguisher safely. It stresses not fighting a fire unless it is small and conditions are safe.
Microbiology fire safety presentation 2014Ryan Murphy
This document provides guidance on fire safety in a microbiology lab. It outlines procedures for responding to different types of lab fires, including extinguishing small alcohol lamp or benchtop fires, dousing trash can fires with water, removing burning gloves or clothing, and calling for help in dangerous situations. The document emphasizes remaining calm and removing flammable materials from the area of the fire. It directs lab users to ask managers if they are unsure how to respond to a fire and provides contact information for further safety instruction.
This lab safety orientation document outlines emergency procedures and safety equipment for fire, medical emergencies, and chemical spills. It instructs users to call the campus emergency number 4911 first for all emergencies before calling 9-911, and provides contact information for the lab managers. Safety goggles and proper disposal of broken glass are emphasized as important protective equipment. Locations of first aid and eyewash stations are indicated, as well as where to find safety data sheets and information about right-to-know laws regarding hazardous chemicals.
The document discusses responsibilities and components of a safety program for laboratories, clinics, and hospitals. It outlines the responsibilities of employers to establish safety policies and procedures, as well as the responsibilities of employees to follow safety protocols and report any unsafe conditions. Additionally, the document provides guidance on key safety topics like fire safety, chemical safety, and bloodborne pathogens.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) developed a hazard labeling system using diamond-shaped labels to indicate the health, flammability, and reactivity risks of chemicals. Each label section uses a number from 0-4 to rate the risk, with 4 being the most dangerous. Special symbols in the bottom section identify additional hazards like poisons, corrosives, or materials that react with water.
This webinar discussed Tier II reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). EPCRA was established after a deadly chemical release in Bhopal, India to support emergency planning and provide information on chemical hazards. Facilities that store hazardous chemicals above threshold quantities must submit Tier II reports annually by March 1st with details on chemical inventories, locations, hazards and emergency contacts. The webinar covered the major provisions and history of EPCRA, explained what information is required in Tier II reports, and provided an overview of how to complete the reporting process before taking live questions from participants.
The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requires facilities to report information about hazardous and toxic chemicals to federal, state and local emergency response authorities to help communities plan for and respond to chemical emergencies. EPCRA establishes reporting obligations for facilities containing hazardous chemicals over certain thresholds and requires facilities to provide information to support emergency planning and notification of chemical releases. It is administered by the EPA and aims to improve public access to chemical hazard data and involvement in emergency response planning.
The Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 states that Tier II Reports must be submitted annually by March 1st to your State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) and local fire department(s). Each violation of the Tier II Reporting requirements may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
It is important to take the time to carefully review your facility to determine the quantity of chemicals stored onsite and understand if these quantities require reporting via the annual Tier II report.
This webinar will educate attendees on best practices for chemical inventory management. Our expert speaker will address a variety of topics to help you ensure your chemical inventory program is safe and compliant while optimizing for ease, simplicity and cost savings. During this webinar you will learn:
Regulations to watch regarding chemical inventory and management
Organization tactics to optimize for safety and system simplicity
Types of software you can use to improve your program
Case study examples of chemical inventory overhauls and simple tactics you can implement at your organization.
If you are generating hazardous waste, it is important to know the recordkeeping requirements that must be followed according to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). These requirements include maintaining records of waste determinations, manifests, and storage times, as well as documenting employee training and emergency preparedness plans. Adhering to these requirements can help ensure compliance with environmental regulations and prevent potential penalties and liabilities. For more details, check now!
BEM 3701, Hazardous Waste Management 1 Course Learnin.docxaryan532920
BEM 3701, Hazardous Waste Management 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
3. Describe various types of hazardous wastes, their impact on the environment, and respective
environmental control and public health remedies.
4. Evaluate relevant regulatory compliance requirements in the industrial environment.
8. Evaluate safety and health efforts related to hazardous waste workers.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 14:
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility Requirements
Chapter 15:
Incineration of Hazardous Waste
Unit Lesson
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility Requirements
In Unit III, you learned about how hazardous waste is regulated from its creation through its transportation.
Ultimately, our hazardous waste must reach its final destination. It must be treated to make it less hazardous
and/or disposed of in a safe way. RCRA regulations for Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs)
are even more extensive than those for generators and transporters (Pichtel, 2014). These regulations are
found in 40 CFR 264-165 Subparts A through G. “Treatment”, “Storage”, and “Disposal” all have specific
definitions that are covered in 40 CFR 270.2.
Subpart A
Subpart A of the regulations cover general issues, such as exclusions from 40 CFR 264 and 265. There are a
variety of exclusions, including farmers disposing of waste pesticides from his or her own use, a totally
enclosed treatment facility, and a generator accumulating waste on-site. If a facility does not fall under exempt
status as outlined in Subpart A, the facility is subject to Subpart B.
Subpart B
Subpart B covers general facility standards including recordkeeping requirements, personnel requirements,
and safety requirements. TSDFs must obtain a site-specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ID
number. Before any waste can be treated or disposed of, the facility must obtain a thorough chemical analysis
of a sample of the waste. A waste analysis plan (WAP) must outline the process and include information such
as the sampling methods used, the procedures used for testing, and the frequency of waste re-evaluation
(EPA). Subpart B also requires a TSDF to have specific security in place at the facility, including a 24-hr
surveillance system and barriers surrounding the active portion of the facility (Pichtel, 2014). The facility also
must inspect the facility on a regular basis. The frequency of inspection varies with the facility and the type of
equipment used, as well as the likelihood of an incident if a malfunction were to occur. RCRA specifies
inspection frequencies for certain types of TSDF equipment. For example, loading and unloading area should
be inspected daily, and containment buildings should be inspected weekly (Pichtel, 2014).
UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities
(TSDFs) and Incineration of Hazardous Waste
...
How well do you know your local EHS regulators? As 2019 rule proposals continue to develop, meet your local regulator to discuss how you may be impacted as an EHS practitioner. Do you have questions about existing regulations? This is the perfect opportunity to get them answered.
Aet presentation-hazardous-waste-generator-improvement-rule-mar.24.17Michael Habig
The document summarizes changes to EPA's hazardous waste generator regulations known as the Hazardous Waste Generator Improvement Rule (HWGIR). Some of the major changes include: allowing very small quantity generators to send their waste to large quantity generators under common control for consolidation; clarifying hazardous waste determination requirements; allowing generators to conduct episodic generation; revising labeling and marking standards; updating biennial reporting for small quantity generators; and strengthening preparedness and planning requirements for small and large quantity generators. The revisions are aimed at simplifying and clarifying the regulations based on input from states and stakeholders.
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response requirements are governed by federal OSHA for emergency responders and contractors cleaning hazardous waste materials from spills and releases. Workers must be properly trained and educated on the health and safety hazards of the work tasks as well as the environment. OSHA has many requirements to ensure the workforce is protected from all types of chemical emergencies.
Statutory requirments on Health Safety EnvironmentVikasMore37
This document discusses statutory requirements for fire protection in industrial establishments and buildings according to the Factories Act, Rules, and National Building Code of India. It covers legal obligations for fire prevention, protection systems, emergency plans, training, and documentation. Requirements address hazardous processes, equipment standards, inspection and organizational structure. The three key steps for fire control are prevention, protection, and emergency handling. Proper handling, storage and transportation of gas cylinders is also outlined.
This document provides guidance for nuclear inspectors on Licence Condition 34, which concerns the control and containment of radioactive materials and waste to prevent leakage or escape. It outlines the purpose and scope of LC34, provides guidance on assessing licensee arrangements and their implementation, and defines relevant terms. The guidance is intended to facilitate a consistent approach to inspections of LC34 compliance and identify additional reference materials for inspectors.
This document provides guidance on creating a comprehensive emergency action plan for workplaces. It discusses standards that require emergency and fire prevention plans, and outlines key elements to include in the plans such as emergency escape procedures, accounting for employees, rescue/medical duties, emergency communications, and fire hazard details. The document also recommends conducting training, identifying internal and external resources, and performing a vulnerability analysis to determine the highest risk emergencies.
This document provides an introduction to the regulations regarding miscellaneous and other hazardous waste treatment units, including thermal treatment units, chemical/physical/biological treatment units, underground injection wells, and miscellaneous units. It explains that these units must comply with both general facility standards and unit-specific standards under Parts 264 and 265 of the RCRA regulations. The document summarizes the key requirements for each type of unit and notes that Part 264, Subpart X addresses permitting miscellaneous units that do not fall under other defined categories.
40 CFR 261.4(a)(23) excludes a hazardous secondary material from regulation as a solid waste - and thus as a hazardous waste - if the conditions of the exclusion are met. This presentation briefly summarizes the requirements of this RCRA conditional exclusion from regulation.
The Generator-Controlled Exclusion was retained and strengthened by the 2015 Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule which was a revision of the 2008 Definition of Solid Waste Rule. Its purpose is to exclude from regulation certain materials that might normally be a hazardous waste but have some value that make reclamation in a safe manner financially viable.
A generator of a hazardous secondary material must comply with the conditions of this exclusion in order to take advantage of its removal of the burden of the cradle-to-grave management of a hazardous waste.
40 cfr 261.4(a)(20) Hazardous Secondary Materials Used to Make Zinc FertilizerDaniels Training Services
The USEPA believes that some zinc-bearing waste may be managed to reclaim the zinc for the manufacture of zinc micronutrient fertilizers. To encourage this recycling, USEPA created this conditional exclusion from regulation as a solid waste for certain hazardous secondary materials if the conditions of the exclusion are met. This presentation explains the restrictions and requirements of the exclusion and provides direction to where more information may be found.
Clean Air Act Compliance, Risk Management Plans, and Preparing for the July 1...Triumvirate Environmental
The document discusses regulatory requirements under the Clean Air Act for risk management plans and toxic release inventory reporting, including an overview of the Risk Management Plan rule requirements under the Clean Air Act, what facilities must submit risk management plans, and details on toxic release inventory reporting requirements including what chemicals must be reported and the annual July 1st deadline.
Similar to Robert Clay, Lincoln University, Lessons Learned After Laboratory Fire, Missouri Hazardous Waste Seminar, November 5, 2015 (20)
Brunetti, Rick, KDHE, Regional Air Issues Roundtable, MECC, 2016, Overland ParkKevin Perry
Rick Brunetti, Director of the Bureau of Air at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, presented at the Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference on May 13, 2016. The presentation showed trends in ozone levels across Kansas, permitting activities for air construction and operating permits issued to industry, and highlighted the department's mission to protect and improve the health and environment of all Kansans.
Chavez, Nikki, iSi Environmental, Form R Tips and Trip Ups, MECC, 2016, Overl...Kevin Perry
This document provides an overview of Form R reporting requirements under the Toxic Release Inventory program. It discusses that Form R has several names but is also known as the Toxic Chemical Release Inventory. Facilities must file a Form R if they have 10 or more full-time employees, engage in applicable industrial activities involving toxic chemicals above threshold quantities, and are not eligible for any exemptions. Thresholds and reporting criteria vary based on whether a chemical is manufactured, processed, or otherwise used. The document provides guidance on calculating thresholds and determining reporting obligations. It also outlines resources for complying with Form R reporting.
Muth, Emily, OPPD, Environmental Compliance and Information Systems, MECC, 20...Kevin Perry
The document discusses environmental compliance and information systems at a utility company. It analyzes the company's current environmental management structure and makes recommendations. Key recommendations include conducting a formal risk assessment, establishing environmental objectives and targets, defining environmental roles and responsibilities, evaluating operational controls, and formalizing processes for managing corrective actions while leveraging existing systems. The implementation of improvements would focus first at the plant level.
Wanzenried, Brian, Gavilon, Strategic Planning for Environmental Staffing, ME...Kevin Perry
This document discusses strategic planning considerations for environmental staffing. It addresses factors to consider in determining staff size and organizational reporting structure. Regarding staff size, the document examines industry benchmarks, regulatory drivers that incentivize adequate staffing, and risks of understaffing. For reporting structure, it explores where environmental staff typically report and advantages of higher-level positioning, such as improved influence, recruitment, planning input, and regulatory perception. The goal is to strategically structure environmental resources based on an organization's needs and risks.
Meerian, Marcus, KDHE, Overview of Revisions to the UST Regulations, MECC, 20...Kevin Perry
The document summarizes new requirements for underground storage tanks (USTs) in the 2015 EPA regulation revisions. Key changes include mandatory operator training, secondary containment for new/replaced tanks and piping, periodic inspection and testing requirements for spill/overfill prevention and detection equipment, and removal of deferrals so emergency generator tanks and certain other previously exempt UST systems must now meet regulation standards. States with approved UST programs have until adopting the new federal standards for the requirements to take effect, while in unapproved states and Indian country the requirements take effect according to the regulation timelines.
Hieb, Wendy, IDNR, Hot Topics in NPDES Permitting, MECC, 2016, Overland ParkKevin Perry
This document summarizes hot topics in NPDES permitting in Iowa, including: updating water quality standards; renewing general permits 5 and 7; creating new general permits 8 and 9; implementing the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy; addressing temperature limits and 316(b) cooling water intake requirements; and complying with new steam electric effluent guidelines. It provides details on permit inventories, rulemaking timelines, and challenges associated with implementing various permitting programs and regulatory requirements in Iowa.
Johnson, Susan, IDNR, Making Hazardous/Non-Hazardous Waste Determinations, ME...Kevin Perry
Susan Johnson presented on Iowa's Special Waste Authorization program which provides for the safe disposal of wastes that pose a threat to human health or the environment. The program requires generators to determine if their wastes are hazardous under RCRA regulations before disposing them. Examples of wastes that may require special authorization include paint booth waste, demolition debris, and contaminated soils. The presentation covered waste determination procedures, disposal standards like limits for toxic metals, and resources available to assist generators in properly managing their wastes.
Andracsek, Robynn, Burns & McDonnell, What Every EHS Staff should Know about ...Kevin Perry
This document discusses air dispersion modeling for environmental permitting. It provides an overview of the EPA-approved models for different types of areas and pollutants. It also summarizes key aspects of modeling including significance thresholds, modeling stages, averaging periods, sources, receptors, meteorological data requirements, and potential challenges. Common questions around stack height, downwash effects, and acceptable input tolerances are also addressed.
Funderburg, Lisa, Stinson Leonard Street, Compliance Tools Top Ten Tips When ...Kevin Perry
Funderburg Lisa Stinson Leonard Street Compliance Tools Top Ten Tips When Conducting an Audit MECC Kansas City 2016 May 11-13, 2016 Overland Park www.mecconference.com
Grice, Lisa, Ramboll, Corporate Sustainability Where the Rest of the Company ...Kevin Perry
Grice Lisa Ramboll Corporate Sustainability Where the Rest of the Company Fits From Strategy to Implementation MECC Kansas City May 11-13, 2016 Overland Park www.mecconference.com
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Microbial characterisation and identification, and potability of River Kuywa ...Open Access Research Paper
Water contamination is one of the major causes of water borne diseases worldwide. In Kenya, approximately 43% of people lack access to potable water due to human contamination. River Kuywa water is currently experiencing contamination due to human activities. Its water is widely used for domestic, agricultural, industrial and recreational purposes. This study aimed at characterizing bacteria and fungi in river Kuywa water. Water samples were randomly collected from four sites of the river: site A (Matisi), site B (Ngwelo), site C (Nzoia water pump) and site D (Chalicha), during the dry season (January-March 2018) and wet season (April-July 2018) and were transported to Maseno University Microbiology and plant pathology laboratory for analysis. The characterization and identification of bacteria and fungi were carried out using standard microbiological techniques. Nine bacterial genera and three fungi were identified from Kuywa river water. Clostridium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., Streptococcus spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Shigella spp., Proteus spp. and Salmonella spp. Fungi were Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus flavus complex and Penicillium species. Wet season recorded highest bacterial and fungal counts (6.61-7.66 and 3.83-6.75cfu/ml) respectively. The results indicated that the river Kuywa water is polluted and therefore unsafe for human consumption before treatment. It is therefore recommended that the communities to ensure that they boil water especially for drinking.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Presented by The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action at GLF Peatlands 2024 - The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action
ENVIRONMENT~ Renewable Energy Sources and their future prospects.tiwarimanvi3129
This presentation is for us to know that how our Environment need Attention for protection of our natural resources which are depleted day by day that's why we need to take time and shift our attention to renewable energy sources instead of non-renewable sources which are better and Eco-friendly for our environment. these renewable energy sources are so helpful for our planet and for every living organism which depends on environment.
Climate Change All over the World .pptxsairaanwer024
Climate change refers to significant and lasting changes in the average weather patterns over periods ranging from decades to millions of years. It encompasses both global warming driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. While climate change is a natural phenomenon, human activities, particularly since the Industrial Revolution, have accelerated its pace and intensity
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
2. Background (Lincoln Institute )
Founded in 1866 by soldiers and officers
of the 62nd and 65th United States Colored
Infantry w/$6400
Members, 65th USCT
62nd USCT Battle Flag
Sgt. John
Henry 62nd
USCT
3. Renamed Lincoln University (1921)
Oldest HBCU 1890 Land Grant Institution
• 3 University Farms
• 160 Acre Campus
• 3000 + students
• 7 Undergraduate degrees programs
in 50 different majors
• 4 Graduate degree programs
with 13 different majors
4. Lincoln University (2015)
• In 2013 Dr. Kevin D . Rome became the
19th University President.
• Mascot - Blue Tigers
• University Motto: "LABORARE ET
STUDERE“ - To labor and study
• Colors – Navy Blue and White
• Oath - …….We will transmit our
University to those who come after us
greater, better, and more beautiful, than
it was transmitted to us.
(Click here to visit Lincoln University’s website)
5. Lesson Learned:
• Inventory requirements Universities vs.
other generators (SQG/LQG’s)
• Emergency Response Reporting
• Contingency Planning
6. Lincoln University
Laboratories (Academic & Research)
• 50 Principal Investigators
• 80 staff members
• 14 Post Doc & Graduate Students
• 66 Student workers
• 35 laboratories
Lab involved in incident
5000 ft2 building
1175 ft2 lab space (4 labs)
7. Common Agencies for Universities and
Other LQG/SQG’s
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to Know Act (EPCRA)
hazardous chemical storage reporting
• Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Chemicals
of Interest (COI)
• Occupational Health and Safety Administration
(OSHA) – Hazard Communication Standard (HCS)
• International Building Code (IBC) - Flammable material
and other storage limits
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 30 & 45) -
Flammable material and other storage limits
Agencies that Require Inventories
8. Typical University Specific Agencies:
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) –
Select agents and toxins
• Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) – NORM/NARM
, sealed /unsealed radiation sources , and radioactive
wastes
• Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) – Controlled
Substances and List I & II regulated chemicals
Agencies that Require Inventories
9. (EPCRA) was passed by Congress in response to concerns
regarding the environmental and safety hazards posed by
the storage and handling of toxic chemicals (1984 Bhopal,
India).
• Section 304. Emergency Notification - Facilities must immediately report
accidental releases of EHS chemicals and "hazardous substances" in
quantities greater than corresponding Reportable Quantities (RQs) must be
available to the public.
• Sections 311 and 312. Community Right-to-Know Requirements - Facilities
manufacturing, processing, or storing designated hazardous chemicals
must make Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) available to state and
local officials and local fire departments. Facilities must also report, to
state and local officials and local fire departments, inventories of all on-site
chemicals for which MSDSs exist.
• Section 313. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) - Facilities must complete and
submit a toxic chemical release inventory form (Form R) annually. Form R
must be submitted for each of the over 600 TRI chemicals that are
manufactured or otherwise used above the applicable threshold
quantities.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
10. EPCRA Tier II Reporting (40 CFR 370.10(a))
Applicability
• Extremely Hazardous Substance (EHS) is present at
any one time in an amount equal to or greater than
500 pounds (227 kg - approx 55 gallons) or the
Threshold Planning Quantity (TPQ), whichever is
lower. EHSs and their TPQs are listed in 40 CFR
355 Appendix A and 40 CFR 355 Appendix B or;
• Any other hazardous chemical that is present at
your facility at any one time in an amount equal to
or greater than 10,000 pounds (or 4,540 kg).
http://www2.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/tri-
threshold-screening-tool
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
11. EPCRA Tier II Reporting (40 CFR 370.13(c)(2))
You do not have to report substances for which you are
not required to have an MSDS under the OSHA
regulations………..Each of the following substances are
excluded under EPCRA section 311(e):…….In a research
laboratory or hospital or other medical facility under the
direct supervision of a technically qualified individual; or
But……….
The Missouri Emergency Response Commission (MERC)
require Universities w/labs that contain material ≥ the
TPQ’s to file a Tier II
(See 40 CFR 370.10(b)(2)) The threshold level for
responding to the following requests is zero….If your
LEPC, SERC, or the fire department with jurisdiction over
your facility requests that you submit Tier II information .
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
12. (CFATS) 6 CFR 27
Background info CFATS Act of 2014, CFATS FR 2014,
& CFATS FR 2007
Applicability
1. Any facility that possesses a Chemicals of Interest
(COI) in Appendix A at or above the Standard
Threshold Quantity (STQ) must complete a Top
Screen Assessment
2. DHS then assigns any facility deemed a high risk to
a preliminary tier based on the Top Screen survey.
3. Facility must then submit a Security Vulnerability
Assessment (SVA) if still deemed a high risk must
submit a Site Security Plan (SSP) that meets risk
based standards or Alternative Safety Plan (ASP)
Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
13. Exemptions:
Release COI used in a laboratory under the supervision of
a “technically qualified individual” need not be counted
toward a facility’s STQ. For more information on this
provision, please refer to 6 CFR 27.203 (b)(2) similar to
40 CFR 370 .13(c)(2)
Violation of such a compliance order may result in
additional orders assessing civil penalties of $25,000 per
day per violation and/or requiring the facility to cease
operations.
Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
14. Hazardous Waste (Emergency Planning)
EPCRA
• 40 CFR 302.4 Spill notification
• 40 CFR 355.10 & 40 CFR 355 .20 Emergency Planning
RCRA (Emergency Planning)
• 40 262.34(d)(5) SQG
• 40 CFR 264 Subpart D Emergency Response
Information LQG’s 40 CFR 264.16 Training & 40 CFR
264.52 Contingency Plan
Missouri DNR
• 10 CSR 25-5.262(I) Spill Notification
• 10 CSR 25-7.264(2)(D) Emergency Planning Procedures
LQG’s and SQG’s ≥ 1000kg at one time
• 40 CFR 264.16 Training
• 40 CFR 264.52 Contingency Plan
OSHA Hazardous Chemical/Substance (Emergency Planning)
• 29 CFR 1910.120(q)
Emergency Response (Notification & Planning)
15. 40 CFR 264.50 to 264.56 (Subpart D)
1. Designated Emergency Coordinator (available within a
short time)
2. Must post the following information next to the
telephone:
• The name and telephone number of the emergency
coordinator and Fire Dept;
• Location of fire extinguishers and spill control
material, and, if present, fire alarm
3. Ensure that all employees are trained on proper waste
handling and emergency procedures, relevant to their
responsibilities during normal facility operations and
emergencies;
General Emergency Response Requirements
16. 4. The emergency coordinator or his designee must
respond to any emergencies that arise in the following
manner:
A. In the event of a fire, call the fire department or
attempt to extinguish it using a fire extinguisher;
B. In the event of a spill, contain the flow of hazardous
waste to the extent possible, and as soon as is
practicable, clean up the hazardous waste and any
contaminated materials or soil;
C. notify the National Response Center (using their 24-
hour toll free number 800/424-8802) if spill has
reach surface waters based upon reporting
requirements
General Emergency Response Requirements
17. Must Contain
1. Arrangements with local police departments, fire
departments, hospitals, contractors, and State and local
emergency response teams to coordinate emergency
services
2. list names, addresses, and phone numbers (office and
home) of all persons qualified to act as emergency
coordinator
3. a list of all emergency equipment at the facility (such as fire
extinguishing systems, spill control equipment,
communications and alarm systems (internal and external),
and decontamination equipment), where this equipment is
required.
4. evacuation plan for facility personnel where there is a
possibility that evacuation could be necessary.
Emergency Response Req. (Contingency Plan)
18. If the owner or operator has already prepared a Spill
Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan in
accordance with part 112 of this chapter, or some other
emergency or contingency plan, he need only amend that
plan to incorporate hazardous waste management
provisions that are sufficient to comply with the
requirements of this part.
Do I need an SPCC Plan?
Things to consider
• Oil reservoirs for elevators and transformers if
containers are 55 gal or greater counted toward the
1,320 gallon total or
• if UST gas storage is greater than 42,000 gallons
Emergency Response Req. (Contingency Plan)
19. 29 CFR 1910.120(p) & 29 CFR 1910.120(q)
Those emergency response organizations who have developed
and implemented programs equivalent to this paragraph for
handling releases of hazardous substances pursuant to section
303 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
of 1986, 42 U.S.C. 11003) shall be deemed to have met the
requirements of this paragraph (see 40 CFR 264 Subpart D).
Incident Command System (ICS) part of National Incident
Management System (NIMS) Training federal government
Haz-Mat Response Training Requirements
• Safety Officer
• Awareness Level
• Operations Level
• Technician Level
EPA/OSHA Crosswalk Emergency Response Summary
Emergency Response Req. (OSHA)
20. Key principles of National Incident Management
System:
Common terminology
Unified command structure
Comprehensive resource management
Integrated communications
NIMS is centered on three main areas:
1. Incident Command System (ICS)
2. Multiagency Coordination Systems, and
3. Public Information System
Why we use NIMS
21. An incident life cycle:
1. Prevention/Mitigation
2. Preparedness
3. Response
4. Recovery
Purpose: Four Phases of Emergency Management:
To standardize a comprehensive emergency management
approach to easily fit …our needs
Four Phases of Emergency Management
22. Inventory:
• SQG do not have permits with inventory requirements on
waste (should be kept as best management practice)
• Remaining chemicals shipped as waste could change
generator status
• Many University labs do not reach TPQ and do not submit
Tier II for labs (Typically UST gas tanks are reportable).
• University Research labs still have to report on Tier II in
Missouri if TPQ reached.
• Many University labs do not reach STQ and do not submit
DHS Top Screen for labs
Emergency Planning:
• SQG’s that are over 1000 kg don’t submit contingency plans
• SPCC (is it needed?) plans are not submitted EPA/MDNR but
must be made available upon request.
• Review Contingency Plans include in NIMS scenarios
Highlights to Remember