Skip to main content
UploadLanguage (EN)Support
BusinessMobileSocial MediaMarketingTechnologyArt & PhotosCareerDesignEducationPresentations & Public SpeakingGovernment & NonprofitHealthcareInternetLawLeadership & ManagementAutomotiveEngineeringSoftwareRecruiting & HRRetailSalesServicesScienceSmall Business & EntrepreneurshipFoodEnvironmentEconomy & FinanceData & AnalyticsInvestor RelationsSportsSpiritualNews & PoliticsTravelSelf ImprovementReal EstateEntertainment & HumorHealth & MedicineDevices & HardwareLifestyle
Kevin Perry, profile picture
Uploaded byKevin Perry
PDF, PPTX546 views

Jay, Mike, US EPA, Regional Air Issues Roundtable, MECC, Kansas City

On February 9, 2016, the Supreme Court stayed the Clean Power Plan (CPP) pending judicial review, while the EPA remains confident that the plan will be upheld based on strong scientific and legal foundations. Although implementation and enforcement of the CPP for existing sources are currently on hold, the EPA will continue to assist states that voluntarily seek to reduce carbon pollution from power plants. The document outlines the EPA's actions and future expectations regarding carbon pollution standards and the CPP.

Environment◦
Download as PDF, PPTX
Supreme Court Stays the Clean Power Plan 1 • February 9, 2016 – The Supreme Court stayed implementation and enforcement of the Clean Power Plan pending judicial review o The Court’s decision was not on the merits of the rule • EPA firmly believes the Clean Power Plan will be upheld when the merits are considered because the rule rests on strong scientific and legal foundations • For the states that choose to continue to work to cut carbon pollution from power plants and seek the agency’s guidance and assistance, EPA will continue to provide tools and support • EPA will provide additional information as it is available Key Points • Implementation and enforcement are on hold • State submittals not required on September 6, 2016 • EPA will continue to work with states that want to work with us on a voluntary basis The remainder of this presentation describes the various components of the CPP for existing sources as they were on February 9, 2016, and is presented only for informational purposes – implementation and enforcement of the CPP for existing sources is on hold pending judicial review
Summary 2 On August 3, 2015 EPA announced three actions that will significantly reduce carbon pollution from the power sector, the largest source of carbon pollution in the US o Carbon Pollution Standards – new, modified and reconstructed sources IN EFFECT; NOT STAYED • 80 FR 64509; October 23, 2015 o Clean Power Plan (CPP) – existing sources STAYED • 80 FR 64661; October 23, 2015 o Federal Plan proposal and model rules Proposed, not finalized • 80 FR 64965; October 23, 2015 When the stay is lifted EPA’s actions will o Achieve significant pollution reductions o Deliver an approach that gives states and utilities plenty of time to preserve ample, reliable and affordable power www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan Presented for informational purposes only; the CPP for existing sources is stayed pending judicial review
4 KS CO2 Emissions and Clean Power Plan Goals Presented for informational purposes only; the CPP for existing sources is stayed pending judicial review 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Tons Year Kansas CO2 Emissions and Goals CPP "Mass goals" (2022-2030) note: currently stayed Mass Emissions from KS CPP-affected Units (2005-15) 2015 Retirements Tecumseh Unit 10 Lawrence Unit 3 2016 Quindaro Units 1 & 2 switch to gas 200 MW Ninnescah Wind Farm 2017 280 MW Western Plains Wind Farm 400 MW Cimarron Bend Wind Farm 200 MW Kingman Wind Energy Center