The document provides steps for comparing two sources. It explains that the sources should be compared based on their provenance, content, and purpose. For content, specific areas like claims, reasons, causes, and solutions can be compared. Examples are given for how to state similarities and differences between the sources based on these criteria.

1. Comparison

2. Three main things to compare:ProvenanceContentPurpose

3. Step 1: Answer the QuestionThey are similar/different to a certain extent.I.e. YOU NEED TO HAVE BOTH SIDES

4. Step 1: Answer the QuestionThey are similar/different to a certain extent.I.e. YOU NEED TO HAVE BOTH SIDES

5. Recall Reliability

6. Step 2: State the criteriaLevel 1:ProvenanceThey are similar in terms of provenanceThey are different in terms of provenance

7. Step 2: State the criteriaLevel 1:ProvenanceE.g. They are different in terms of provenance. Source A is from a blog site, written by an anonymous person, while Source B is a speech by the Prime Minister

8. Step 2: State the criteriaLevel 2:CONTENTThey are similar in saying…. (what claims)They are different in saying… (what claims)They are similar/different in terms of content

9. Step 2: State the criteriaLevel 2:CONTENTThey are similar in saying…. (what claims)They are different in saying… (what claims)They are similar/different in terms of content

10. What are some content areas to that can be compared?Good or badEffective or not effectiveBeneficial or not beneficialViolent or not violentThe reasons

11. The causes

12. The problems

13. The solutions

14. The consequences/ impactsStep 2: State the criteriaCONTENTThey are similar in saying that the ERP (solution) is effective.Source A says that ERP is effective.This can be seen from, “…………………”This means that …………………………….Source B ALSO says that ERP is effective.This can be seen from, “…………………”This means that …………………………….