Respond to each peer initial post with 3-4 sentences long Peer # one Conflict is a part of any organization no matter how successful they are. I see it a lot in our voting members and to a lesser degree with our Board of Directors. Our voting members are about double the amount of the Board so I think naturally there is a little more disagreement. In order to resolve conflict, it is important to understand the reason behind the issue. Then it is important to follow through with addressing the situation immediately after being identified. Another step in resolution includes getting as much information as possible by speaking to all parties involved. Conflict doesn’t only happen with voting members and the Board, but also within the office. The most recent issue happened in a meeting last week. Our customer service rep cut someone off in a meeting out of frustration and it was definitely not done in a professional manner. It was incredibly uncomfortable as a meeting attendee not to mention her direct higher up and the CFO were in this meeting. I think that if this conflict isn’t resolved, it will continue to manifest in various ways and turn into one of them quitting or getting fired. I know that this has been brewing because I try to keep the lines of communication open around the office. Our customer service rep is frustrated with our ticketing manager because he does too much. When he steps in and goes outside of his department, he gets involved in things that he doesn’t need to, puts more work on himself and ends up working additional hours that aren’t necessary. In this meeting, he ended up trying to take the lead which was not necessary. Our customer service rep got frustrated and I would describe her as yelling at him to tell him that this wasn’t his meeting to run. I am not in a position to necessarily intervene, however, I have been talking to my Operations Director who is the direct supervisor for both of them. If I were to be able to take the lead on this, my tactic would start with meeting with them both individually. For one, to discuss what their responsibilities are and try to work toward them staying in their lane, so to speak. There are plenty of people around to help that he does not need to be the hero. When that happens, something ends up getting neglected. With the customer service rep, her general tact is nonexistent. I think the discussion with her starts with how to communicate appropriately with coworkers. This happens to be an issue with others in the office. She could achieve a lot more if she could learn how to better approach people. This wasn’t necessarily her place to step in. I am not sure in this case, that it is necessary to bring the parties together as both issues do not seem to involve the other. If they both fixed the items I have discussed, I think it would naturally resolve any issue they have had. However, if I brought them together, the message I would convey to both is a reset of what our roles co.