It has become imperative to conduct funded research in today's highly resource constrained landscape of higher education. We must understand the attributes of research the mindset of researcher and the requirements of funded research.
There are some motivational elements for publishing. These elements are important for young researchers and faculty members. We should also keep in mind the quality indices such as h-index or impact factor associated with publications.
There are both challenges and opportunities in the existing scenario characterized by heavy emphasis on collaboration, digitization and onset of social media. One needs to be connected with theme, institution, industry and society. The web 2.0 technologies make it possible for a researcher to be a connected one.
All 275 slides for the course "TransDisciplinary Research Methods" taught in 2020 at Auckland University of Technology. Course design by Ricardo Sosa sosa.ricardo@gmail.com
Management discipline is highly field oriented requiring strong focus on research. The current scenario is characterized by digitization, collaboration and novel measures to assess the impact of research.
Doctoral Symposium Slides from ACM International Conference on Interactive Su...Stacey Scott
The ISS Doctoral Symposium, held with the ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) 2016, is a forum in which PhD students can meet and discuss their work with each other and a panel of experienced Interactive Surface researchers in an informal and interactive setting.
To participate, students submit a paper that describes the problem that their thesis aims to address, their research methodology, the work they have completed thus far, and the plan for the full dissertation work. Doctoral Symposium papers are published in the ISS conference companion distributed at the conference and archived in the ACM Digital Library.
Accepted students present their work to a panel of senior researchers in the ISS field, and participate in an intensive workshop around ISS research and profession career development. They also obtain free conference registration.
There are some motivational elements for publishing. These elements are important for young researchers and faculty members. We should also keep in mind the quality indices such as h-index or impact factor associated with publications.
There are both challenges and opportunities in the existing scenario characterized by heavy emphasis on collaboration, digitization and onset of social media. One needs to be connected with theme, institution, industry and society. The web 2.0 technologies make it possible for a researcher to be a connected one.
All 275 slides for the course "TransDisciplinary Research Methods" taught in 2020 at Auckland University of Technology. Course design by Ricardo Sosa sosa.ricardo@gmail.com
Management discipline is highly field oriented requiring strong focus on research. The current scenario is characterized by digitization, collaboration and novel measures to assess the impact of research.
Doctoral Symposium Slides from ACM International Conference on Interactive Su...Stacey Scott
The ISS Doctoral Symposium, held with the ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) 2016, is a forum in which PhD students can meet and discuss their work with each other and a panel of experienced Interactive Surface researchers in an informal and interactive setting.
To participate, students submit a paper that describes the problem that their thesis aims to address, their research methodology, the work they have completed thus far, and the plan for the full dissertation work. Doctoral Symposium papers are published in the ISS conference companion distributed at the conference and archived in the ACM Digital Library.
Accepted students present their work to a panel of senior researchers in the ISS field, and participate in an intensive workshop around ISS research and profession career development. They also obtain free conference registration.
This note describes our analysis of 35 papers from CHI 2011 that aim to improve or support interaction design practice. In our analysis, we characterize how these CHI authors conceptualize design practice and the types of contributions they propose. This work is motivated by the recognition that design methods proposed by HCI researchers often do not fit the needs and constraints of professional design practice. As a complement to the analysis of the CHI papers we also interviewed 13 practitioners about their attitudes towards learning new methods and approaches. We conclude the note by offering some critical reflections about how HCI research can better support actual design practice.
BROWN BAG TALK WITH CHAOQUN NI- TRANSFORMATIVE INTERACTIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC...Micah Altman
This talk, is part of the MIT Program on Information Science brown bag series (http://informatics.mit.edu)
A competitive scientific workforce is essential for the health and well-being of a society. However, U.S. dominance in the global knowledge economy has been challenged in recent years: the U.S. is outspent by China (in terms of R&D funding) and out-produced by the EU (in terms of doctoral graduates and scientific publications). Furthermore, gender inequalities persist, with men producing more scientific articles than women in every state.
From Dr. Ni, "I argue that, for a country to be scientifically competitive, it must maximize its human intellectual capital-base and support this workforce equitably and efficiently. I propose here a large-scale and heterogeneous analysis of the sociality, equality, and dynamicity of the scientific workforce through novel computational models for understanding and predicting the career trajectory of scientists based on their transformative interactions, gender, and levels of funding. This analysis will be able to isolate factors that contribute to the health and well-being of the scientific workforce. The computational models will quantify the impact of those transformative events and interactions and provide models to predict the career trajectory of scientists based on their gender, the size and position of the social network, and other demographic factors."
Chaoqun Ni got her Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in E-Commerce and Information System from Wuhan University, and Doctoral Degree in Information Science from Indiana University in Bloomington.
Chaoqun Ni's research has appeared in a variety of computer science, informatics, library, and scientific publications, including Nature, Scientometrics, Journal of Association for Information Science and Technology, and Simmons SLIS' Library and Information Science Research. In addition to receiving a Dean's Fellowship from the Department of Information & Library Science at Indiana University Bloomington, Ni received the Association for Information Science and Technology's New Leader Award in 2011, and the Association for Library and Information Science Education Doctoral Student Award in 2014.
محاضرة تناقش اهمية العلم والبحث العلمى بداية من الهدف من البحث العلمى والفرق بين الباحث والعالم وتشرحقيمة معادة العلماء ثم كيفية تحديد المشكلة ومواصفاتها واهمية المدارس العلمية واعطاء مثال على مدرسة بحثية ناجحة ثم كيفية كتابة البحث ةقراءة البحث وكيفية تقديمة للمجلة ثم كيفة التعامل مع البحث المرفوض والاخطاء التى يجب الا يعملها الباحث ثم الجوائز
Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination...Anup Kumar Das
The presentation titled "Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination and Evaluation of Research Output in India" was presented in 18th Indian Science Communication Congress (ISCC2018), celebrating 200 Years of Science Journalism in India, at NASC, New Delhi during 20-21 December 2018.
Research in current scenario -sgd-adamf-20-apr-2018Sanjeev Deshmukh
Current research is driven by huge developments due to internet and digital disruptions. Democratization of education has opened up new vistas for doing research. It is essential to remain visible.
Today research visibility is very important in an otherwise crowded digital environment. Here the concept of visibility generated and visibility earned is explained.
This note describes our analysis of 35 papers from CHI 2011 that aim to improve or support interaction design practice. In our analysis, we characterize how these CHI authors conceptualize design practice and the types of contributions they propose. This work is motivated by the recognition that design methods proposed by HCI researchers often do not fit the needs and constraints of professional design practice. As a complement to the analysis of the CHI papers we also interviewed 13 practitioners about their attitudes towards learning new methods and approaches. We conclude the note by offering some critical reflections about how HCI research can better support actual design practice.
BROWN BAG TALK WITH CHAOQUN NI- TRANSFORMATIVE INTERACTIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC...Micah Altman
This talk, is part of the MIT Program on Information Science brown bag series (http://informatics.mit.edu)
A competitive scientific workforce is essential for the health and well-being of a society. However, U.S. dominance in the global knowledge economy has been challenged in recent years: the U.S. is outspent by China (in terms of R&D funding) and out-produced by the EU (in terms of doctoral graduates and scientific publications). Furthermore, gender inequalities persist, with men producing more scientific articles than women in every state.
From Dr. Ni, "I argue that, for a country to be scientifically competitive, it must maximize its human intellectual capital-base and support this workforce equitably and efficiently. I propose here a large-scale and heterogeneous analysis of the sociality, equality, and dynamicity of the scientific workforce through novel computational models for understanding and predicting the career trajectory of scientists based on their transformative interactions, gender, and levels of funding. This analysis will be able to isolate factors that contribute to the health and well-being of the scientific workforce. The computational models will quantify the impact of those transformative events and interactions and provide models to predict the career trajectory of scientists based on their gender, the size and position of the social network, and other demographic factors."
Chaoqun Ni got her Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in E-Commerce and Information System from Wuhan University, and Doctoral Degree in Information Science from Indiana University in Bloomington.
Chaoqun Ni's research has appeared in a variety of computer science, informatics, library, and scientific publications, including Nature, Scientometrics, Journal of Association for Information Science and Technology, and Simmons SLIS' Library and Information Science Research. In addition to receiving a Dean's Fellowship from the Department of Information & Library Science at Indiana University Bloomington, Ni received the Association for Information Science and Technology's New Leader Award in 2011, and the Association for Library and Information Science Education Doctoral Student Award in 2014.
محاضرة تناقش اهمية العلم والبحث العلمى بداية من الهدف من البحث العلمى والفرق بين الباحث والعالم وتشرحقيمة معادة العلماء ثم كيفية تحديد المشكلة ومواصفاتها واهمية المدارس العلمية واعطاء مثال على مدرسة بحثية ناجحة ثم كيفية كتابة البحث ةقراءة البحث وكيفية تقديمة للمجلة ثم كيفة التعامل مع البحث المرفوض والاخطاء التى يجب الا يعملها الباحث ثم الجوائز
Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination...Anup Kumar Das
The presentation titled "Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination and Evaluation of Research Output in India" was presented in 18th Indian Science Communication Congress (ISCC2018), celebrating 200 Years of Science Journalism in India, at NASC, New Delhi during 20-21 December 2018.
Research in current scenario -sgd-adamf-20-apr-2018Sanjeev Deshmukh
Current research is driven by huge developments due to internet and digital disruptions. Democratization of education has opened up new vistas for doing research. It is essential to remain visible.
Today research visibility is very important in an otherwise crowded digital environment. Here the concept of visibility generated and visibility earned is explained.
Research & pedagogy In digital environment : Imperatives & Implications Sanjeev Deshmukh
The digital environments calls for a number of innovative measures to sustain and enhance research. Social media and use of alt-metrics can enhance visibility of research.
This is an updated version of my earlier presentation on current research. It talks about teh digital environment and how to be visible in this digitalized world as a researcher.
This presentation talks about need for research, the way impact of research is measured and the current trends in making research more visible. A case of econometric is dealt with,
The open academic: Why and how business academics should use social media to ...Ian McCarthy
Abstract: The mission of many business schools and their researchers is to produce research that that impacts how business leaders, entrepreneurs, managers, and innovators, think and act. However, this mission remains an elusive ideal for many business school academics because they struggle to design and produce research capable of overcoming the "research-practice gap." To help those scholars address this gap, we explain why and how they should use social media to be more 'open' to connecting with, learning from, and working with academics and other stakeholders outside of their field. We describe how social media can be used as a boundary-spanning technology to help bridge the research-practice gap. To do this, we present a process model of five research activities: networking, framing, investigating, dissemination, and assessment. Using recently published research as an illustrative example, we describe how social media was used to make each activity more open. We conclude with a framework of different social media-enabled open academic approaches (connector, observer, promoter, and influencer) and some dos and don'ts for engaging in each approach. This paper aims to help business academics rethink and change their practices so that our profession is more widely regarded for how its research positively impacts practice and societal well-being more generally.
How much can you say in one sentence? Useful Science Keynote Address at ComSc...Useful Science
ComSciCon is a series of workshops on science communication led and attended by graduate students. From April 12th-13th, Useful Science Director Maryse Thomas joined students at ComSciCon Pacific Northwest 2019 in Seattle and delivered the keynote address, encouraging students to take the plunge and kickstart their own sci-comm initiatives.
Social Media and the 21st-Century Scholar: How Researchers Can Harness Social...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Mar 6, 2019
Topic: Social Media and the 21st-Century Scholar: How Researchers Can Harness Social Media to Amplify Their Career
Speaker: Teresa M. Chan, MD, MHPE, Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
Overview: Improving health care requires better dissemination of research discoveries to reach practitioners, patients, and the public. Effective scholarship is essential to achieve this goal. The speaker Dr. Chan argues that it is "incumbent on scientists and scholars to use every tool in their armamentarium, including social media, to reach their intended audiences."
Presented by John Young (ODI) and Laura Harper (Wellcome) at the Public Engagement Workshop, 2-5 Dec. 2008, KwaZulu-Natal South Africa, http://scienceincommunity.wordpress.com/
GFAR webinar "building a bridge between scientists and communicators"GCARD Conferences
These is the slide deck of presentations used during the webinar "Building a bridge between scientists and communicators"
This webinar was organised by GFAR
It was introduced in this blogpost: https://blog.gfar.net/2017/01/03/webinar-scientists-and-communicators-friends-or-foes/
The video recording of the actual webinar can be found on our Youtube channel: https://youtu.be/HK8Q0JgAaGQ
Faculty at Plaksha have trained and worked at some of the world’s best universities, bringing with them diverse domain knowledge and interdisciplinary expertise.
This is a workshop delivered by the UC Berkeley Library Office of Scholarly Communication Services on October 25, 2019.
This workshop will provide you with practical strategies and tips for promoting your scholarship, increasing your citations, and monitoring your success. You’ll also learn how to understand metrics, use scholarly networking tools, evaluate journals and publishing options, and take advantage of funding opportunities for Open Access scholarship.
The core mission of a university is to create knowledge (through research) and disseminate knowledge (through teaching). Both academics and universities are, accordingly, judged on the quality and impact of their research. For an individual academic, promotion at his or her own university is largely determined by research productivity. For staff seeking to move to another university, nationally or internationally, a strong research record becomes even more critical, since the new university can easily judge the quality of research outputs, but has much less information about a candidate’s teaching effectiveness.
For universities, quality is often judged (eg, in global and national league tables) by the average citations per academic, by the number of PhD completions or by the external research income generated. For public universities, their government grants are increasingly linked to their research output, which is measured by a regular national research assessment exercise. The quality of research papers, as reflected by the acceptance rates and impact factors of the peer-reviewed journals in which they are published, is being increasingly evaluated alongside the societal impact of the work, as evidenced by advances in technology or impact on public policy.
For anyone seeking to build a successful academic career and support the development of their own institution, it is critical to develop a clearly focused research agenda which can be sustained over time, with the aim of contributing to knowledge and society and establishing the academic as an intellectual leader in a definable field. Publishing in a scattergun way in predatory journals and presenting at worthless predatory conferences is a waste of energy and money and undermines the credibility of an academic with his or her peers.
Similar to Research , researcher and Funded Resesrch (20)
This is a presentation about Covid-19 implications for research and researchers. This was part of a webinar on Emerging Trends in Research in field of Commerce and Management
organized by P.G. Department of Commerce Science College at Hinjilicut (Odisha).
Industrial Engineering (IE) offers immense opportunities to improve Productivity, Quality and Responsiveness. Herein , some of the issues are highlighted.
There is a need to have a comprehensive look at the concept of smart village. This presentation is a part of a training programme on "IoT based smart village" conducted at ABV-IIITM.
Talent nurturing vis-a-vis student devlopment is a challenge. This challneg requires a multi-pronged focus and involvement of all the stakeholders.
Acdemic leadership need to recognise the same and work on a variety of initiatives to develop and nurture studnets.
Emerging manufacturing systems will be smart, sustainability and responsive to customer needs. Industry 4.0 offers an interesting platform. It is an integrative and all embracing architecture.
Lot of preparation is required for a typical young faculty while pursuing his/her career. He is constantly challenged and he/she has to excel in various dimensions such as teaching, research, extension/outreach, administration and professional recognition.
This is about the challenges faced by teacher in the scenario of onslaught by digital environment. One needs to tackle it by being sensitive to the needs of the hour and also by properly embracing the technology.
This is on how to do literature review based on some experience in good journals. Literature review is an important phase in any research and must be given due importance .
This presents an overview about relevance and significance of statistics as a valid tool in enhancing quality of research. It also touches upon some misuse and abuse of statistics.
a perspective which intergates trusteesip, commmunity and holistic views is proposed for conducting a value based evaluation of supply chains. It is envisage that such a perspective will motivate sustainability for various stakeholders in the chian.
Sgd imperatives-for quality in digital enviorn-amity-jun-2017Sanjeev Deshmukh
Today's highly turbulent environment calls for quality response from educators. We need to adopt a service orientation while making students engaged in our transactions.
Sgd Some thoughts on Technology-Day-11 - May-2017-slideshareSanjeev Deshmukh
Technology affects us ans gets impacted by our expectations and aspirations in a country like India. Vision 2035 , a document by TIFAC has highlighted a few interesting trends .
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
2. Acknowledgement
This presentation is based on extensive
discussions & informal sessions with
Prof R P Mohanty, Prof N K Sharma, Prof S S Yadav,
Prof Ravi Shankar, Prof M K Tiwari, Prof R S
Deshpande, Mr N Ratnaliikar, Dr Jitesh Thakkar , Dr
Manoj Dash, and Prof Abid Haleem
Grateful to numerous research scholars and
young faculty members from various
institutes
2
3. Speaking points..
◼ Opening remarks..
◼ Prevailing environment
◼ Its implications for research
◼ Concept of connected researcher
◼ Funded research
◼ Closing remarks..
5. Warm up Exercise !
Do it in a Group of Four
Spend 5 Minutes!
◼ Consider current scenario of research.
What type of changes are taking place ?
◼ What are the implications ?
◼ List down the key competencies of a
researcher
5
10. Observations..
◼ Transformation taking place everywhere ,
university is no exception to this !
◼ Lot of expectations from a university,
especially from a private funded university
◼ Multiple roles expected from a faculty
member
◼ The way we communicate has changed.
Research is no exception to this !
10
11. Key pillars of a good
University
◼ Teaching
◼ Knowledge Transfer
◼ Global outlook
◼ Research.
11
12. Why research : Global view
THE: World university ranking template
www.timeshighereducation.co.utk/world-university-rankings/
Sn Factor Weightage
1 International outlook 7.5 %
2 Research : Volume, Income,
Reputation
30.0 %
3 Citations: Research influence 30.0 %
4 Industry Income: Innovation 2.5 %
5 Teaching: Learning environment 30.0%
12
13. Why research.. National view .
Your research credentials are looked
through
I. Visibility & Accreditations
II. Knowledge creation and dissemination
III. Attracting students, researchers, faculty etc.
IV. Funding, Industry support & Sustainability
V. Part of NIRF template
Source: Haleem Abid, 2013, Enhancing research
credentials, presentation for faculty at AMU
13
14. Various ranking templates
Source: Cherukodan Surendran, Sheeja N.K. & Mathew Susan K , Scholarly Communication & Institutional Ranking: A
study based on NIRF, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala,
ir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/ir/.../3/P32_ID%20720_Surendran_Sheeja_Susan_Cusat_.ppt
15. RPC :Research and Professional
Practice
◼ Combined metric for Publications (PU)
◼ Combined metric for Quality of Publications
(QP)
◼ IPR and Patents: Filed, Published, Granted
and Licensed (IPR)
◼ Footprint of Projects and Professional
Practice And Executive Development
Programs (FPPP):
18. Today’s research
◼ Literature review, Methodology, Analysis
enabled by IT and collaborative tools
◼ Turnaround time for Ph D has reduced
◼ Shelf life of an idea condensed
◼ Time-to-publish has drastically reduced
◼ Industry as collaborative partner
18
19. Internet & Research
◼ Internet as a TOOL FOR research or…
◼ Internet as a MEDIUM OF research
TOOL=search engines, databases, catalogs,
etc…
MEDIUM=chat rooms, newsgroups, home
pages, blogs, skype, tweeting, online course
software, etc
20. Google trends..
◼ Google trends is the feature in google where
people search for the most searched subject
of the world !
◼ Visit : http://www.google.com/trends
20
21. Exploring statistics from
google trends
◼ Using google trends for predicting
consumer analysis and as a predictor for
macro-economic behaviour
◼ Backend-google database search (using
search, images, YouTube)
◼ Useful for short term forecasting/now
casting where data may not be available
21
24. Implications
◼ You have to update continuously and must
know the state-of-the-art
google enables this!
◼ Subject scan aided by IT tools: search engines,
indexing services !
◼ You have to be comfortable with the Online
community
◼ Please visit
http://www.scimagojr.com/
24
25. Imperative 1: Online
Publications and time scales
◼ Web enabled world: Millions of ideas getting
generated, developed and disseminated
◼ Faster publishing cycle
◼ Web enabled submission, review and
publication process (ScholarOne :
http://scholarone.com/)
◼ Shelf life of an idea has shortened
considerably, especially so in management
domain
25
26. Implications
◼ You have to update continuously and must
know the state-of-the-art
◼ Literature review aided by IT tools: search
engines, indexing services !
◼ You have to be comfortable with the Online
community
◼ Please visit
http://www.scimagojr.com/
26
27. Implications
◼ You can not afford to be invisible in the
digitized world
◼ Impact measures are available
◼ Someone is going to measure you and
make you visible !
◼ You are constantly indexed, searched and
under scrutiny
◼ You are also under constant onslaught of
new and emerging ideas ! 27
28. Imperative 2 : Sharing,
collaboration & connectivity !
◼ Sharing of information
◼ Professional networks
◼ Collaboration opportunities
◼ Powerful Social networks
28
29. Implications
◼ Sharing of information/Knowledge made
easy through IT
◼ You must share and connect
◼ Your collaborator may be anywhere in the
globe available 24 x 7 basis
◼ Power & influence of social media as a
binder!
29
31. Social platforms for sharing..
◼ Network for researchers
◼ One can share and
disseminate
◼ Contributions in terms of
publications, downloads,
datasets etc.
31
Pegrum, M., "'I link therefore I am': network literacy as a core digital literacy", E-
learning and Digital Media 7(4), 346-354 2010 doi:10.2304/elea.2010.7.4.346
32. Implications..
◼ Each of these areas, require research
◼ The focus could be on interdisciplinary
research
◼ Entrepreneurial research
32
33. Research Level Maturity Model
of a university
◼ Level 1: Knowledge disseminator /creator
Importance of teaching, research, training etc.
◼ Level 2: technology transfer - the entrepreneurial
university
Importance on technology transfer mechanisms,
incubation, innovation, start-ups
◼ Level 3: knowledge networked university
Focus on a wide range of interactions
Exchange rather than transfer with a variety of partners
(Industry, other global univ.etc.)
35. 7 Habits of
Connected Researchers
◼ Who is a connected researcher?
Connected to self
Connected to institute
Connected to industry
Connected to profession
Connected to society
http://www.slideshare.net/SanjeevDeshmukh/trends-
inconnectingresearchsgd2013
◼ Acknowledgement : Heavily Adapted from
Stephen R. Covey’s work !35
37. Seven habits move
through stages
• Dependence: the paradigm under which we
are born, relying upon others to take care of
us
• Independence: the paradigm under which
we make our decisions and take care of
ourselves.
• Interdependence: the paradigm under
which we cooperate /collaborate to achieve
something that cannot be achieved
independently. (this is very much needed in
funded research !)
38. Habit 1: Be Proactive
◼ Act and not re-act : Be connected
◼ Researcher free to choose: Self-awareness,
conscience, imagination, independent will
◼ Always think positively !
◼ Explore forthcoimg opportunities for funding
◼ Look for funding call from various agencies/
◼ Make friendship with those who are already
conducting funded research .
◼ This is the foundation of being “connected”
39. Habit 2:
Begin with the End in Mind
◼ Researcher need a destination and a compass
◼ A Researcher’s Mission Statement
◼ The end should always be “what is best for me
for professional recognition through being
connected .” Research Proposal is one !
◼ Planning makes things better.
◼ It is better to sweat during peacetime rather
than bleed during wartime !
40. Habit 3: Put First Things
First
◼ Establish priorities in the academic career
◼ Balance academics with social skills,
character education, health and self
esteem: Being part of community !
◼ Evolve communities of practice !
41. Habit 4: Think Win-Win!!!!
◼ Adopt the attitude: “Let me listen to you first”
or “Help me to understand”
◼ By listening, we learn faster !
◼ Positive discipline - How can you and the peer
win??? .
◼ Moving from “me” to “we”
◼ 1+1 = 11?
42. Habit 5: Seek First to Understand..Then to
be Understood
◼ Understand your personal competencies
◼ Make a SWOT analysis of self.
◼ Recognize your limitations and work to
overcome them.
◼ Avoid miscommunications.
◼ Practice Empathic Listening – to your critics,
peer group etc,
◼ Get feedback
43. Habit 6 : Synergize
Principles of Creative Cooperation
• Find ways of working in teams.
• Apply methods for collaborative
research working
• Value differences.
• Build on divergent strengths.
• Leverage creative collaboration.
• Embrace and leverage innovation.
44. Whole that is Greater than
the Sum of the Parts
◼ Through mutual trust and understanding, one
often can solve conflicts and find a better
solution than would have been obtained
through individual solution
◼ When synergy is pursued as a habit, the result
of the teamwork will exceed the sum of what
each of the members could have achieved on
their own.
◼ This is possible being CONNECTED ! And be
in a collaborative mode
45. Habit 7: Sharpen the Saw
◼ Renew yourself: socially, mentally, and
spiritually.
◼ Nurture your relationship with the online
community
◼ Continuously update and upgrade yourself
◼ Use Mooc to upgrade
yourself(coursesera,NPTEl etc.)
◼ Always grow - be a better Researcher today
than you were yesterday .
46. Seven habits of Most
Defective People !
◼ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh3
SV5pVCS8
46
47. Remarks..
◼ Research is inevitable.
◼ Good research brings visibility and recognition
◼ Trends such as limited shelf life, collaborative
forces, connecting push and digitization of
research outcome affecting the quality and
quantity of research
◼ We must migrate to higher levels of maturity
through research
◼ Seven habits will help us to be connected and be
effective !
48. Develop self-competency
◼ Linked in Learning centre
Courses on excel, R, data analytics etc.
◼ R for Data Science: Lunchbreak Lessons
:Course by: Mark Niemann-Ross
❑ Slideshare- presentations on numerous
topics
❑ TEDx talks..
❑ Youtube
48
49. Desirable skill set for a
researcher
Communication
Report writing
Team
working
Leadership
Planning and
organisation
Project
management
Enterprise
Problem Solving
Reflection
Adaptability
Energy
Drive and resilience
Enthusiasm/passion
Self awareness
Confidence
Contextual/cultural
awareness
Capacity to develop
Positive attitude
Business and
environment
awareness
IT skills
50. Researcher “Aaadhar”: means
of being digitally connected
50
ORCID orcid.org/0000-0002-7043-6948
Scopus Id Author ID: 7102221659
SSRN Author ID: 2982630
Authors productivity: Through h-index ?
H-Index is the best known. Attempts to measure both productivity and
impact of the published work.
A researcher has an index h if h of his/her Np papers has at least h
citations each
To have an h-index of 5, an author has to have 5 publications, each
receiving at least 5 citations
Variants include g-index and m-index
Account for highly cited papers or author career span
51. Researcher : Where to Find H-
Index
Value of the index may vary depending on the source of information
(number of indexed publications, time span, etc.)
◼ Web of Science
To identify all publications by an author you can use Author Analyze
search function or enter author's ORCID or ResearcherID identifier (if
known)
◼ Google Scholar
Requires creation of Google Scholar profile before providing metrics
H-index tends to be higher than what is calculated by Web of Science
◼ Publish or Perish http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm
Freely accessible software program
Uses Google Scholar data and includes h-index, g-index, m-index and
other metrics
52. References
◼ Waldrop M (2008) Science 2.0: Great new tool, or great risk? Scientific
American. Available at:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-
new-tool-or-great-risk
◼ Digital Researcher http://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers/315321/Digital-
Researcher.html
◼ Cann, A., Dimitriou, K., Hooley, T., "Social Media : A guide for researchers",
(February), 2011
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-
research/social-media-guide-researchers
52
54. Why FUNDED research ?
◼ Research budgets are shrinking
everywhere.
◼ Researchers are being forced to
seek external funding
◼ It helps to get visibility
◼ NIRF requires this.
55. Please note
◼ Funds are awarded to finance particular
activities and not to be paid back.
◼ It is important to know the goals of the
funding agencies (like DST, DeITy, ICSSR,
MHRD etc.) and their grant programs.
◼ Decisions are made on the applicant’s ability
to fit the proposed research activities to the
interests of the funding agency.
57. UK-India Education and Research
Initiative (UKIERI)
◼ Initiative which aims to create a ‘step change’ in educational
relations between India and the UK
◼ Objectives:
To strengthen collaboration between academic
partners.
To promote stronger links to industry and related
communities
58. Before beginning to prepare a
proposal, consider the following:
◼ Rule #1: Believe that someone wants to give
you the money.
◼ Consider the long-term goals of your institution.
◼ Start with the end in mind (top down approach)
◼ Identify yourself and your strengths and
institutional support
◼ Create a comprehensive plan - not just a
proposal of what you wish to achieve.
59. Do Your Homework
◼ Research prospective funding bodies.
◼ Target funding source that has interest
in your area of competence/expertise
and programme.
◼ Survey other disciplines from where
you can borrow expertise
60. Explore Funding Agencies
Gather information on:
❑ Details of grants available.
❑ How to apply for them.(formats etc.)
❑ Previous funding patterns
61. Approaching the Proposal
⚫ Your case will be read by one or two experts in
your field but others in the judgement panel
won’t be experts. You must write for their benefit
too.
⚫ Ask lots of people to help you improve your
proposal. Get their feedback. Act on that !
⚫ Make sure the first page acts as a stand-alone
summary of the entire proposal.
62. Major Criteria: Questions to
be Answered
◼ What the objectives of the project?
◼ What will be the outcomes? Deliverables?
◼ Does the proposal address a well-formulated problem?
◼ Is it a research problem or just a routine application of a
known technique?
◼ Is it an important problem, whose solution will have
useful effects?
◼ Is special funding necessary to solve the problem or to
solve it quickly enough?
63. Points..
◼ Do the proposers have a good idea on which to base their
work?
◼ Does the proposal explain clearly what work will be done?
◼ Is there evidence that the proposers know about relevant work
that others have done?
◼ Do the proposers have a good track record, both of doing good
research and of publishing it?
◼ What are the implications for policy and
practice? How will these be taken up?
64. Additional criteria
◼ An applicant with existing funding may be favoured
due to evidence of a good track record.
◼ Also priority is given to new researchers in the field.
◼ Funders generally prefer to offer a reasonable balance
of support for different research areas.
◼ Evidence of industrial interest in the proposal and its
potential for future exploitation will count in favour.
65. ⚫ There is no evidence that the proposers will succeed
where others have failed.
⚫ A new idea is claimed but insufficient technical details
are given.
⚫ The proposers seem unaware of related research.
⚫ The proposed research has already been done.
Common Shortcomings
66. Points..
◼ The proposal is badly presented or
incomprehensible.
◼ The proposers seem to be attempting too
much for the funding requested and/or the
time-scale envisaged.
◼ The proposal is too expensive for the probable
gain.
◼ The proposer’s institution should be funding it.
67. ◼ Funding bodies also look for good researchers.
◼ Think of them as potential investors in you and your
ideas.
◼ You must ‘sell’ your idea: Be enthusiastic about the
work!
◼ Why should they give a grant? See it from the
funder’s point of view.
◼ Remember that you are NOT begging.
◼ You have ideas, they have money.
Additional points to
remember...
68. Typical Structure
Essential Contents:
◼ Statement of the problem.
◼ Summary of current developments in the
field.(National/International)
◼ Statement of what is new about the project.
◼ Indication of the extent to which the research builds on
previous work by you and by others?
◼ In certain cases, assurance that you are aware of existing work
in the field despite no exhaustive literature review being
available.
69. Methods: Questions to be
answered
◼ What methods will be applied to achieve the
aims? The methodology must be described
in detail and clearly related to the research
questions.
◼ Are the chosen methods sufficiently rigorous
to produce clear answers?
◼ What is the timetable? This must be
realistic.
◼ Prepare a good Gantt chart
70. Evaluation
❑ How will you measure the success of your
project?
❑ Distinguish between monitoring &
evaluation. Monitoring is part of the project
management while evaluation is formal
assessment of the outcome of a project.
71. Dissemination: Questions to
be answered
◼ Dissemination through :
workshops/seminars/brainstorming sessions
◼ What audience should be targeted to
achieve the maximum impact?
◼ How might this audience best be reached?
◼ What is the budget for dissemination?
72. Personnel
◼ Explain the staffing requirements (SRF/JRF)
in detail
◼ It is essential to provide brief details of the
relevant qualifications and experience of the
staff.
◼ To minimise expenses, the plan should
include the phasing out of staff whenever
their tasks are completed.
73. Budget
◼ The application should include an
itemised budget setting out the costs year
by year.
◼ A cost justification for each item should be
given.
◼ The budget should be exhaustive.
◼ If additional funding from other sources is
sought then this should be made clear.
74. Timing
◼ The individual tasks should be sequenced
logically and allocated realistic durations.
◼ Detailed reasoning should be given for the
task sequence and durations.
◼ Prepare a detailed time phased work plan
75. Revising/Reviewing Your
Proposal
◼ Seek regular feedback from your
peers/superiors as soon as possible during
the development of the proposal, allowing
time to receive responses.
◼ Good proposals take a long time to develop,
so plan well ahead to ensure meeting the
deadline.
76. Some Advice
◼ Do not feel ashamed or embarrassed about
asking for help from seniors/peers .
◼ If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.
◼ Learn from feedback regarding a rejected
proposal.
◼ Be ready with 5-6 proposals simultaneously.
◼ Be positive!
77. Useful tools
Tool For Source
1 Endnote Reference manager https://endnote.com/
2 Research
Excellence
framework
Metric https://www.ref.ac.uk/
3 Publons Tracking your
research impact
https://publons.com/a
bout/home/
77
78. Takeaway from this session :
Action agenda
◼ Get ORCID/Scopus/SSRN id
◼ Download mendeley.com/Endnote
◼ Download harzing : Publish or Perish
◼ Sign in for academia /Researchgate
◼ Sign in for Publons
◼ Simply conduct a search in Google Scholar
and click on the “Create alert” link in the left-
hand column
79. 4Ps of proposal
◼ Perform: submit the best proposal you can
◼ Practice and get feedback from wherever
possible
◼ Participate in academic/social networks
◼ Persist, Persist, Persist with perseverance !
Source: Harzing Ana : The four P's of getting published -
https://harzing.com/blog/2016/12/the-four-ps-of-getting-published
81. Remember these points..
◼ 1. Think big, act through small initiatives
◼ 2. Problems are unanswered questions
◼ 3. Never be afraid of writing proposals
◼ 4. Decide to become proactive from today
◼ 5. See yourself as a salesperson selling the idea for
research proposals
◼ 6. Improve your skills
◼ 7. Learn to love criticism
◼ 8 Create something (hardware/software/routine etc.) as
tangible deliverable of your proposal !
81