PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 Ms. Lory Mae Alcosaba
Subject Teacher:
Grading System (ACADEMIC)
COMPONENTS %
Written Works 50
Performance Tasks 50
Written Works:
• Summative Test (4)
Performance Task:
• Module Answers
• Research PT
• Others (TBA)
Grading System (TECHVOC)
COMPONENTS %
Written Works 30
Performance Tasks 70
Practical
Research 2
2nd Semester
Quarter 3
Week 1
● Describes the
characteristic, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
Learning Competencies
● Research is NOT merely gathering
information .
● Research is NOT merely rummaging
around for hard-to-locate information
● Research is NOT merely transporting
facts from one location to another
WHAT RESEARCH IS NOT
● Research is a systematic process of
collecting, analyzing, and interpreting
information—data— in order to increase
our understanding of a phenomenon about
which we are interested or concerned.
(Leedy & Ormrod, 2015)
WHAT RESEARCH IS
● The research process is ITERATIVE.
A researcher sometimes needs to move back and forth
between two or more steps along the way
● The research process is CYCLICAL
research typically involves a cycle in which one study
spawns additional, follow-up studies. Research begets
more research
(Leedy & Ormrod, 2015)
WHAT RESEARCH IS
● Qualitative research requires non-numerical data,
which means that the research uses words rather
than numbers. – (textual)
● Quantitative research involves measurement of data.
(numerical)
Qualitative VS Quantitative
Qualitative VS Quantitative
Qualitative Quantitative
Elements of
Analysis
Words, pictures, documents, objects,
artifacts, etc.
Numeric or Statistical (measurable)
Research type
and objective
Exploratory
To explore or discover ideas or
concepts
Conclusive
To describe, examine relationships
and differences among variables.
Hypothesis
None or generated Tested
(relationship/difference)
Samples and
Sampling
Individualized (small)
Non-probability (purposive)
Group (large)
Probability (random)
Instrument Open-ended Closed-ended
DO NOT to think of the
quantitative–qualitative
distinction as mutually
exclusive.
● Quantitative research is a type of
inquiry where relations are
established through the collection
of numerical data which are
analyzed to derived generalization.
● It is a systematic scientific
analysis of data and their
relationship.
QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
CHARACTERISTICS
STRENGTHS
KINDS
WEAKNESS
OBJECTIVE
• Data gathering and
analysis of results are
done accurately,
objectively, and are
unaffected by the
researcher’s intuition and
personal guesses.
LARGE SAMPLE SIZE
• To obtain more meaningful statistical result, the data must come
from a large sample size.
This Photo by
GENERALIZABLE & RELIABLE DATA
• Data taken from a sample
can be applied to the
population if sampling is
done accordingly, i.e.,
sufficient sample size and
random samples were
taken.
FAST DATA
COLLECTION
• Depending on the type of data needed,
collection can be quick and easy.
• Quantitative research uses
standardized research instruments that
allow the researcher to collect data
from a large sample size efficiently.
FASTER DATA ANALYSIS
• The use of statistical tools give way for a less time-consuming
data analysis.
VISUAL RESULT PRESENTATION
• Data is numerical, which makes presentation through graphs,
charts, and tables possible and for better conveyance and
interpretation
REPLICATION
• The quantitative method can be repeated to verify findings
enhancing its validity, free from false or immature conclusions.
1. Quantitative research can be replicated or repeated.
2. Findings are generalizable to the population.
3. Numerical and quantifiable data can be used to predict
outcomes.
4. Fast and easy data analysis using statistical software.
5. Fast and easy data gathering.
6. It is objective.
7. Validity and reliability can be established.
1. It lacks the necessary data to explore a problem or concept in
depth.
2. It does not provide comprehensive explanation of human
experiences.
3. Some information cannot be described by numerical data such
as feelings, and beliefs.
4. The participants are limited to choose only from the given
responses.
5. The respondents may tend to provide inaccurate responses.
6. A large sample size makes data collection more costly.
Major distinction:
• Non-Experimental
- Descriptive Research design
- Correlational research design
- Ex post facto research design
• Quasi-Experimental
• Experimental
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH DESIGN
• Is used to describe a particular phenomenon by observing it as it
occurs in nature.
• There is no experimental manipulation and the researcher does
NOT start with a hypothesis.
• 1 Variable and 1 Group or population
Number of Hours spent of Grade 12 learners in
social media
CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH DESIGN
• It identifies RELATIONSHIPS between variables.
• Data is collected by observation since it does NOT consider the
cause and effect.
• 2 variable and 1 group or population
Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement
of Grade 12 learners in the New Normal.
EX POST FACTO OR CAUSAL COMPARATIVE
• Is used to investigate a possible CAUSAL relationship between
previous and present conditions.
• There is no experimental manipulation. There is a
PARTICIPANT INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.
• 1 variable and 2 or more groups
Attitudes towards Practical Research 2 of
Academic and TVL students
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
• Used to establish the cause and effect relationship of variables.
• It has lesser validity due to the absence of random selection and
assignment of subjects.
• The independent variable is identified but not manipulated.
• The researcher does not randomly assign groups and must use
ones that are naturally formed or pre-existing groups.
The effect of part-time employment on the
achievement of high school students
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
• Is used to establish the cause and effect relationship of two or more
variables.
• It provides a more conclusive result because it uses random
assignment of subject and experimental manipulations.
• Subjects are randomly assigned to experimental treatments rather
than identified in naturally occurring groups.
The effect of teaching with a cooperative group
strategy or a traditional lecture approach on
students’ achievement
Design
Intervention
(Experimental
group)
Control group
Random
Assignment
Non-
Experimental NO NO NO
Quasi-
Experimental YES NO/MAYBE NO
Experimental YES YES YES
END

Quantitative Research

  • 1.
    PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2Ms. Lory Mae Alcosaba Subject Teacher: Grading System (ACADEMIC) COMPONENTS % Written Works 50 Performance Tasks 50 Written Works: • Summative Test (4) Performance Task: • Module Answers • Research PT • Others (TBA) Grading System (TECHVOC) COMPONENTS % Written Works 30 Performance Tasks 70
  • 2.
  • 3.
    ● Describes the characteristic,strengths, weaknesses, and kinds of quantitative research. Learning Competencies
  • 4.
    ● Research isNOT merely gathering information . ● Research is NOT merely rummaging around for hard-to-locate information ● Research is NOT merely transporting facts from one location to another WHAT RESEARCH IS NOT
  • 5.
    ● Research isa systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information—data— in order to increase our understanding of a phenomenon about which we are interested or concerned. (Leedy & Ormrod, 2015) WHAT RESEARCH IS
  • 6.
    ● The researchprocess is ITERATIVE. A researcher sometimes needs to move back and forth between two or more steps along the way ● The research process is CYCLICAL research typically involves a cycle in which one study spawns additional, follow-up studies. Research begets more research (Leedy & Ormrod, 2015) WHAT RESEARCH IS
  • 7.
    ● Qualitative researchrequires non-numerical data, which means that the research uses words rather than numbers. – (textual) ● Quantitative research involves measurement of data. (numerical) Qualitative VS Quantitative
  • 8.
    Qualitative VS Quantitative QualitativeQuantitative Elements of Analysis Words, pictures, documents, objects, artifacts, etc. Numeric or Statistical (measurable) Research type and objective Exploratory To explore or discover ideas or concepts Conclusive To describe, examine relationships and differences among variables. Hypothesis None or generated Tested (relationship/difference) Samples and Sampling Individualized (small) Non-probability (purposive) Group (large) Probability (random) Instrument Open-ended Closed-ended
  • 9.
    DO NOT tothink of the quantitative–qualitative distinction as mutually exclusive.
  • 10.
    ● Quantitative researchis a type of inquiry where relations are established through the collection of numerical data which are analyzed to derived generalization. ● It is a systematic scientific analysis of data and their relationship. QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
  • 11.
  • 12.
    OBJECTIVE • Data gatheringand analysis of results are done accurately, objectively, and are unaffected by the researcher’s intuition and personal guesses.
  • 13.
    LARGE SAMPLE SIZE •To obtain more meaningful statistical result, the data must come from a large sample size. This Photo by
  • 14.
    GENERALIZABLE & RELIABLEDATA • Data taken from a sample can be applied to the population if sampling is done accordingly, i.e., sufficient sample size and random samples were taken.
  • 15.
    FAST DATA COLLECTION • Dependingon the type of data needed, collection can be quick and easy. • Quantitative research uses standardized research instruments that allow the researcher to collect data from a large sample size efficiently.
  • 16.
    FASTER DATA ANALYSIS •The use of statistical tools give way for a less time-consuming data analysis.
  • 17.
    VISUAL RESULT PRESENTATION •Data is numerical, which makes presentation through graphs, charts, and tables possible and for better conveyance and interpretation
  • 18.
    REPLICATION • The quantitativemethod can be repeated to verify findings enhancing its validity, free from false or immature conclusions.
  • 19.
    1. Quantitative researchcan be replicated or repeated. 2. Findings are generalizable to the population. 3. Numerical and quantifiable data can be used to predict outcomes. 4. Fast and easy data analysis using statistical software. 5. Fast and easy data gathering. 6. It is objective. 7. Validity and reliability can be established.
  • 20.
    1. It lacksthe necessary data to explore a problem or concept in depth. 2. It does not provide comprehensive explanation of human experiences. 3. Some information cannot be described by numerical data such as feelings, and beliefs. 4. The participants are limited to choose only from the given responses. 5. The respondents may tend to provide inaccurate responses. 6. A large sample size makes data collection more costly.
  • 21.
    Major distinction: • Non-Experimental -Descriptive Research design - Correlational research design - Ex post facto research design • Quasi-Experimental • Experimental
  • 22.
    DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH DESIGN •Is used to describe a particular phenomenon by observing it as it occurs in nature. • There is no experimental manipulation and the researcher does NOT start with a hypothesis. • 1 Variable and 1 Group or population Number of Hours spent of Grade 12 learners in social media
  • 23.
    CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH DESIGN •It identifies RELATIONSHIPS between variables. • Data is collected by observation since it does NOT consider the cause and effect. • 2 variable and 1 group or population Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement of Grade 12 learners in the New Normal.
  • 24.
    EX POST FACTOOR CAUSAL COMPARATIVE • Is used to investigate a possible CAUSAL relationship between previous and present conditions. • There is no experimental manipulation. There is a PARTICIPANT INDEPENDENT VARIABLE. • 1 variable and 2 or more groups Attitudes towards Practical Research 2 of Academic and TVL students
  • 25.
    QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN •Used to establish the cause and effect relationship of variables. • It has lesser validity due to the absence of random selection and assignment of subjects. • The independent variable is identified but not manipulated. • The researcher does not randomly assign groups and must use ones that are naturally formed or pre-existing groups. The effect of part-time employment on the achievement of high school students
  • 26.
    EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN •Is used to establish the cause and effect relationship of two or more variables. • It provides a more conclusive result because it uses random assignment of subject and experimental manipulations. • Subjects are randomly assigned to experimental treatments rather than identified in naturally occurring groups. The effect of teaching with a cooperative group strategy or a traditional lecture approach on students’ achievement
  • 27.
    Design Intervention (Experimental group) Control group Random Assignment Non- Experimental NONO NO Quasi- Experimental YES NO/MAYBE NO Experimental YES YES YES
  • 28.

Editor's Notes

  • #6 It is systematic because there is a definite set of procedures and steps which you will follow. Planned and methodical. There are certain things in the research process which are always done in order to get the most accurate result.
  • #9 Mam ano po ba ang ibig sabihin ng exploratory? When we say exploratory, it’s an initial study. Isa itong study na gagawin mo muna bago ka gumawa ng higher study. Kung sisimplehan natin, ang result, findings and conclusions ng isang qualitative research ay nakakapag-generate ng hypothesis na pwedeng i-test gamit ang quantitative research. Yung mga resulta ng mga qualitative research niyo last year ay pwedeng gamitin as stepping stone in creating your own quantitative study. Ang quanti research ay ang ending, because it is conclusive or definitive in nature. Sabi ko nga kanina, yung mga findings, conclusions, and recommendations of your quali research can generate hypothesis and those hypothesis can be concluded in a quanti research In quali, Mauuna muna yung results, findings, and conclusions bago makapag generate ng hypothesis Quanti research has the capability to test hypothesis. Not all quantitative studies has hypothesis to test. It still depends on the kind of quanti research you’re going to conduct. Ibig sabihin, may set standard, quality or traits ka on who you want to be in your research. Sa quanti, instead of individuals, ang pinagaaralan na natin ay group. So everyone has the equal opportunity to be included in your research. Open-ended – interviews, observations, immersions, and etc. Close-ended – may choices ang respondents. You are not giving them a chance to explain themselves.
  • #10 it-has-to-be-one-thing-or-the-other dichotomy. Many researchers collect both quantitative and qualitative data in a single research project—an approach sometimes known as mixed-methods research
  • #11 AS A QUICK RECAP
  • #13 It is not based on mere intuitions and guesses. In terms of data gathering tool, it is objectively constructed. Because it undergone validity and reliability test. And the instrument used is closed-ended. Ikaw ang nagbibigay ng choices sa mga respondents mo Hindi mo sila binibigyan ng chance na ipaliwanag yung sagot nila.
  • #14 Ang pinagaaralan na natin ay grupo na. Emphasize ko lang na hindi ka required na kunin ang buong population, unless your population is relatively small. Usually, nagc-compute tayo ng sample size that is enough to represent our population. For example, this whole pizza is our population and the slice would be our samples. Assuming that this is enough in representing our population. The formula that researchers use is the slovin’s formula. Na paguusapan natin pag nasa chapter 3 na tayo.
  • #15 Bakit ba generalizable and reliable ang data ng quanti research? Una, meron ka kasing large sample size which are enough to represent the whole population. Pangalawa, yung paggamit ng probability or random sampling. Ibig sabihin, binibigyan ng equal chance or opportunity na maging part o source ng data ng mga researchers. Ikatlo, ang paggamit ng valid, reliable at objective na instrument. Dahil sa paggamit nito eh binibigyan ka rin ng valid, reliable and objective result. Lastly, ang paggamit ng statistical tools, dahil mas nagiging accurate or tama ang paga-analyze ng mga numerical or statistical data dahil sa data gathering tool na ginamit ng mga researchers.
  • #16 Sa isang quanti research, gumagamit tayo ng standardized research instrument katulad ng nakikita mo ngayon. Dahil diyan, nagkakaroon tayo ng chance na makapag gather ng data sa isang malaking number of sample size ng sabay sabay at mas mabilis. Pero syempre, dapat bantayan mo yung mga respondents ko kung binabasa at pinagiisipan nila ng maayos yung mga sagot nila. Dahil kahit sabihin mong valid, reliable, and objective yung instrument mo eh kung hindi sinagutan ng maayos, eh magkakaroon ng problem sa accuracy, validity sa resulta ng study mo. Lalo ngayon na nasa new normal tayo, so for sure gagamit kayo ng mga google forms.
  • #17 Dahil sa advantage ng technology, Mas madaling mag compute, analyze ng data for research. Pwedeng gumamit ang mga researchers ng excel and ibm spss when computing for statistics. Hence we can say that quanti research has faster data analysis than quali research, bakit? Dahil mas madali mag analyze or interpret ng numbers or statistics kaysa sa words, pictures, objects, and etc.
  • #18 This is an advantage of quanti reasearch dahil pwede tayong gumamit ng visual representations when presenting frequencies, percentage or when comparing means and results dahil numerical ang ating data. Hence, mas madali sa researcher and sa reader ang pag-interpret ng data.
  • #19 Yes, tama ang rinig mo, pwede kang mag replicate ng study. By now you should be aware that the results of a quantitative study is generalizable, meaning it is widely accepted or applicable doon sa settings o sa population na pinag gawan ng study. Now, pwede kang magreplicate ng study para UNA, gusto mong ma-validate kung yung bang result ng unang study ay valid at reliable pa rin doon sa parehong settings o population IKALAWA, may nakita kang quantitative study sa ibang setting at sa ibang population at gusto mong ma-validate kung yun bang resulta ng study na yon ay applicable din sa sarili mong settings o population. As your research adviser, eto lang din ang maipapayo ko sa inyo. If you guys are going to repeat a study, make sure that your purpose is to replicate NOT to duplicate. That your goal is to validate the results. NOT to make your life easier.
  • #24 When two variables are correlated, researchers sometimes conclude that one of the variables must have, in some way, cause or influence the other. And maybe this influence exist, but ultimately we can never infer a cause-and-effect relationship on the basis of correlation alone. Sa isang correlation design, pwedeng ma-identify kung merong positive relationship or negative relationship between variables. Positive relationship ay yung kapag tumaas si variable 1 ay tataas din si variable 2 o kapag bumaba si variable 1 habang bumababa si variable 2. SI negative relationship naman ay ganto, kapag bumaba si variable 1 ay tataas din ba si variable 2 or vice versa.
  • #25 Meron independent variable but it is not manipulated by the researcher. Instead, merong participant independent variable. Meaning, yung independent variable na icoconsider ay hindi manipulated but rather something that is innate or nandoon na sa participant of the study. In ex post facto study, a researcher identifies events that have already occurred or conditions that are already present and then collects data to investigate a possible relationship between these factors and subsequent characteristics or behaviors.