This document summarizes psoriatic arthritis, including its clinical features, patterns, epidemiology and comparison to rheumatoid arthritis. Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis that is typically seronegative for rheumatoid factor. It can present as oligoarticular, distal interphalangeal-predominant, polyarticular, spondylitic or arthritis mutilans patterns. Studies show 20% of patients develop deformities within 10 years. Psoriatic arthritis is classified with other seronegative spondyloarthropathies due to characteristics like HLA-B27 positivity and sacroiliitis.
Dermatomyositis is a rare inflammatory myopathy with characteristic skin manifestations and muscular weakness.
Polymyositis is a similar disease without skin lesions.
Amyopathic dermatomyositis: typical cutaneous manifestation of DM without clinical and/or laboratory findings of muscle involvement for at least 6 months after the onset of skin rash.
12.01.08(a): Rheumatoid Arthritis/Pathogenesis and Clinical Presentation of J...Open.Michigan
Slideshow is from the University of Michigan Medical School's M2 Musculoskeletal sequence
View additional course materials on Open.Michigan:
openmi.ch/med-M2Muscu
Dermatomyositis is a rare inflammatory myopathy with characteristic skin manifestations and muscular weakness.
Polymyositis is a similar disease without skin lesions.
Amyopathic dermatomyositis: typical cutaneous manifestation of DM without clinical and/or laboratory findings of muscle involvement for at least 6 months after the onset of skin rash.
12.01.08(a): Rheumatoid Arthritis/Pathogenesis and Clinical Presentation of J...Open.Michigan
Slideshow is from the University of Michigan Medical School's M2 Musculoskeletal sequence
View additional course materials on Open.Michigan:
openmi.ch/med-M2Muscu
DotNetCampus - Continuous Integration con Sql ServerAlessandro Alpi
Continuous Integration con SQL Server. Come automatizzare i processi di build e di test su database SQL Server. Come includere SQL Server nei processi di Application Lifecycle Management (Database Lifecycle Management).
SQL Server 2016 porterà tantissime novità, tra cui, per quanto riguarda la programmabilità, il supporto al formato JSON. vedremo com'è possibile serializzare i risultati delle nostre query tramite la clausola FOR JSON, inclusa negli ultimi rilasci della piattaforma.
[ITA] Sql Saturday 355 in Parma - New SQL Server databases under source controlAlessandro Alpi
We are used to see our code under source control. What about our databases? This topic is too often underestimated. Keeping database under our control (source controlled) brings many advantages in terms of organization and quality. The distributed work become rock solid and Continuous integration is simpler to implement. In addition, we can take many advantages from testing, automated deployment and all the stuff that brings the agile methodology available to the team. We will compare also third party tools in order to understand the differences between different vendors.
This is the work shop that I gave today at the Urban Media Makers Film Festival. The audition w watched is on my youtube channel. Rosalyncwilliams@gmail.com
[ENG] Sql Saturday 355 in Parma - New "SQL Server databases under source cont...Alessandro Alpi
We are used to see our code under source control. What about our databases? This topic is too often underestimated. Keeping database under our control (source controlled) brings many advantages in terms of organization and quality. The distributed work become rock solid and Continuous integration is simpler to implement. In addition, we can take many advantages from testing, automated deployment and all the stuff that brings the agile methodology available to the team. We will compare also third party tools in order to understand the differences between different vendors.
DevOpsHeroes 2016 - Realizzare Continouous Integration con SQL Server e Visua...Alessandro Alpi
In questa serie di slide vedremo come creare i build step su Visual Studio Team Services sfruttando gli add-on forniti da Red Gate, come DLM Automation 2: Build.
#DOAW16 - DevOps@work Roma 2016 - Databases under source controlAlessandro Alpi
In these slides we will speak about how we can put our databases under source control. What are the type of source control models and links, and, last but not least, how to move from a manual process to an automated one, in order to achieve the goals of DevOps
PASS Virtual Chapter - SQL Server Continuous IntegrationAlessandro Alpi
Build automatizzate, esecuzione di unit test, creazione di un pacchetto nuget, ecco cosa serve per essere pronti con SQL Server e la continuous integration
Exercícios sobre conferências ambientais, conceitos demográficos, globalização, geopolítica e comércio internacional. Gabarito na última página do arquivo.
Managing CV risk in Inflammatory Arthritis (Focusing on Gout)Sidney Erwin Manahan
Presentation made during the 1st Inter-Hospital Rheumatology Fellows' Case Discussion on 9 June 2018 at the Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Auditorium, 7/F East Avenue Medical Center. Presentation highlights the needs to recognize gout as one of the rheumatic conditions that put patients at risk for developing CV disease.
New diagnostic tools in sepsis - Adam Linder - SSAI2017scanFOAM
A talk by Adam Linder at the 2017 meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Anaestesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
All available content from SSAI2017: https://scanfoam.org/ssai2017/
Content delivered in collaboration between scanFOAM, SSAI & SFAI.
Dr. Swamy Venuturupalli talks about Rheumatoid Arthritis, Early Diagnosis and Treatment at the James R. Klinenberg symposium on Rheumatic diseases in Pasadena, CA.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdfJim Jacob Roy
Cardiac conduction defects can occur due to various causes.
Atrioventricular conduction blocks ( AV blocks ) are classified into 3 types.
This document describes the acute management of AV block.
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
15. PsA
Reported
Series*
Feature Roberts Kammer Gladman Torre-
Alonso
Veale Jones
Year 1976 1979 1987 1991 1994 1994
Site Leeds Boston Toronto Spain Leeds Bath
No. 168 100 220 180 100 100
M/F 67/101 45/55 104/116 99/81 59/52 43/57
Age 40 39 37 39 34 38
J < S ? 30 17 15 ? 18
SI NA 11 26 20 14 16
Asymm ? 53 21 45 43 26
Sym. 78 28 48 42 33 63
Distal 17 10 12 1 16 1
Back ? 2 3 7 4 6
Mutilans 5 7 16 5 2 4
*Includes only series with > 100 Patients
16. Psoria'c
arthri's:
A
dis'nct
en'ty
?
• Dutch
study
found
no
associa'on
between
psoriasis
and
polyarthri's.
• No
associa'on
between
HLA
an'gens
and
seronega've
polyarthri's
with
psoriasis.
• No
radiological
features
in
seronega've
polyarthri's
with
psoriasis.
– van
Romunde
LKJ,
et
al.Rheumatology
Interna'onal
1984;4:55-‐73.
• ?
fortuitous
associa'on
– Cats
A.
Cu's
1990;46:323-‐329.
17. Psoria'c
arthri's
• Prevalence
of
psoriasis
in
the
general
popula'on:
0.1-‐2.8%.
• Prevalence
of
psoriasis
in
arthri's
pa'ents:
2.6-‐7.0%.
• Prevalence
of
arthri's
in
the
general
popula'on:
2-‐3%.
• Prevalence
of
arthri's
in
psoria'c
pa'ents:
6-‐42%.
Epidemiological Evidence
18. Psoria'c
arthri's:
A
dis'nct
en'ty
!
• Previous
popula'on
studies.
• Epidemiological
studies.
• Dutch
study
found
DIP
joints
disease
more
common
in
pa'ents
with
seronega've
polyarthri's
and
psoriasis.
• A
dis'nct
form
of
arthri's,
with
different
paBerns,
associated
with
psoriasis.
19. A
comparison
between
Psoria'c
Arthri's
and
Rheumatoid
Arthri's
Psoriatic
Arthritis
Rheumatoid
Arthritis
DIP Involvement Common Uncommon
Symmetry Less Common Common
Erythema of joint Common Uncommon
Back Involvement Common Uncommon
Skin Lesions Always Uncommon
Nail Lesions Common Uncommon
Dactylitis Common Uncommon
Enthesitis Common Uncommon
Rheumatoid nodules Never Common
Rheumatoid Factor Uncommon Common
HLA-B*27 40-50% 4-8%
20. Assessment
of
Tenderness
RA
N=51
PsA
N=50
Test P Value
Fibromyalgia (N) 29 12 Χ2
=9.99 0.0016
Dolorimeter (Kg)
Tender Points
4.77 6.60 t=5.23 <0.0001
Dolorimeter (Kg)
Control Points
5.99 7.58 t=5.18 <0.0001
Dolorimeter (Kg)
Active Joints
4.19 6.78 t=10.18 <0.0001
Psoriatic Arthritis Vs. Rheumatoid Arthritis
Buskila D, et al. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1115-9.
21. Psoria'c
Arthri's
Classified
with
the
Seronega've
Spondyloarthropathies:
– It
is
usually
seronega've
for
rheumatoid
factor.
– It
may
be
associated
with
a
spondyloarthropathy.
– It
is
associated
with
HLA-‐B27.
Classification
22. Differen'a'ng
PsA
from
other
SpA
Feature PsA AS ReA IBD
M:F 1:1 9:1 8:1 1:1
Age onset 35-45 20 20 Any
Peripheral 96% 25% 90% Common
Distribution Any Axial
Lower limbs
Lower
limbs
Lower
limbs
Dactylitis 35% Uncommon Common Uncommon
Enthesitis Common Common Common Unommon
Sacroiliitis 40% 100% 80% 20%
HLA-B*27 ~50% >90% 80% 40%
23. Psoria'c
Arthri's
Prevalence
• Exact
prevalence
unknown.
• Es'mated
figures
vary
from
0.1%
in
Rochester
Minnesota
to
1.4%
in
the
Faroe
Islands.
• Recent
Survey
by
Na'onal
Psoriasis
Founda'on
suggests
prevalence
of
1.4%
of
general
popula'on
in
the
US.
• Recent
study
from
Toronto
suggests
a
prevalence
of
2.5%.
24. Psoria'c
Arthri's
Prevalence
among
people
with
psoriasis
Author (yr) Centre No. Ps. Pts. % PsA
Leczinsky (1948) Sweden 534 7
Vilanova (1951) Barcelona 214 25
Little (1975) Toronto 100 32
Scarpa (1984) Napoli 180 34
Stern (1985) Boston 1285 20
Zaneli (1992) Winston-Salem 459 17
Barisic-Drusko (1994) Osijek region 553 10
Salvarani (1995) Regio Emilia 205 36
Shbeeb (2000) Mayo Clinic 1056 6.25
Brockbank (2001) Toronto 126 31
NPF (2002) US 4.4 m 23
25. Psoria'c
arthri's
♦ PsA
is
much
more
serious
than
previously
recognized.
♦ 20%
of
pa'ents
with
PsA
develop
clinical
deformi'es
and
damage,
resul'ng
in
func'onal
disability.
♦ ≥5
deformi'es
were
detected
in
55%
of
pa'ents
aKer
10
years
of
follow-‐up.
Gladman DD et al. Quart J Med 1987;62:127.
Torre Alonso et al. Brit J Rheumatol 1991;30:245.
Clinical Outcome
26. The
University
of
Toronto
Psoria'c
Arthri's
Program
Duration <1 yr 1-5 yr 6-10 yr >10 yr
Visit 1st Last 1st Last 1st Last 1st Last
No Deformities 53% 51% 70% 50% 64% 35% 59% 22%
< 5 deformities 28% 30% 20% 28% 17% 28% 26% 23%
≥5 deformities 19% 19% 10% 22% 19% 37% 15% 55%
Development of Deformities during follow-up
Gladman DD. Baillière’s Clinical Rheumatology1994;8:379.
27. Prognos'c
Indicators
in
PsA
• Progression
of
damage
defined
by
a
change
in
damage
state:
– State
1
=
0
damaged
joints
– State
2
=
1-‐4
damaged
joints
– State
3
=
5-‐9
damaged
joints
– State
4
=
≥
10
damaged
joints
• Analysis
by
model
for
rate
of
transi'on
between
damage
states.
Clinical Indicators of Progression
Gladman DD et al. J Rheumatology 1995;22:675.
28. Prognos'c
Indicators
in
PsA
Relative Risk
Variable 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 Χ2
P value
> 4 Effusions 1.6 1.6 1.6 5.7 0.017
ESR < 15 0.61 0.61 - 6.68 0.01
Rx 1.78 1.78 1.78 7.8 0.005
Steroids 1.55 1.55 1.55 5.46 0.019
Multivariate model for Clinical Indicators
of Clinical Progression*
Gladman DD et al. J Rheumatology 1995;22:675.
*Based on clinical features at presentation
30. Prognos'c
Indicators
in
Psoria'c
Arthri's
Factor Relative
Damage Rate
95% CI P value
No. AJ 1.04 1.02,1.07 <0.001
↓ FC 1.86 1.05,2.16 0.027
Male gender 0.65 0.47,0.92 0.013
Current Damage 3.95 2.52,6.20 <0.001
Initial ESR 0.61 0.42,0.90 0.013
Pre Clinic Rx 1.83 1.20,2.79 0.005
Final Multivariate Model for Time Varying Clinical Indicators
Gladman DD, Farewell VT. J Rheumatol 1999;26:2409
31. Outcome
in
Psoria'c
arthri's
♦ PsA
pa'ents
are
at
an
increased
risk
of
death.
♦ Overall
risk
is
1.62
that
of
Ontario
Residents.
• 1.66
for
women,
1.59
for
men
♦ Causes
of
Death
are
similar
to
general
popula'on.
♠ Risk
of
death
is
related
to
previously
ac've
and
severe
disease.
Wong K, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1868-7.
Gladman DD, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1103-10.
Mortality Studies
32. Mortality
in
Psoria'c
Arthri's
Primary Cause N (%)
Circulatory system 17 (36.2)
Myocardial Infarction 13 (27.6)
Cerebrovascular accident 2 ( 4.3)
CHF/arteriosclerosis 2 ( 4.3)
Respiratory system 10 (21.3)
Pneumonia 7 (14.9)
COPD 3 ( 6.4)
Digestive system (liver) 4 ( 8.5)
Malignant neoplasms 8 (17.0)
Injuries/poisoning 7 (14.9)
Other 1 ( 2.1)
Total known cause 47 ( 100)
Primary causes of death in 53 patients
33. Survival in Psoriatic Arthritis
Time Since Clinic Entry (Years)
SurvivalProbability
0 5 10 15 20
0.50.60.70.80.91.0
All patients
34. Mortality
in
Psoria'c
Arthri's
Factor Relative
risk
Confidence
interval
P
value
Prior Medication 1.83 0.93, 3.60 0.079
Radiological damage 3.88 1.32,11.35 0.014
ESR > 15 3.77 1.31,10.83 0.013
Nail changes 0.33 0.14, 0.76 0.009
Prognostic Factors: Final Multivariate Model
Gladman DD, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1103-10.
35. Remission
in
Psoria'c
Arthri's
Summary
♦ Remission
occurred
in
17.6%
of
our
PsA
pa'ents.
♦ Male
gender
and
less
ac've
and
severe
arthri's
at
presenta'on
to
Clinic
were
associated
with
remission.
♦ Only
6
(8.7%)
of
the
PsA
pa'ents
sustained
“true
remission”,
♦ 35
(52%)
had
subsequent
flares.
Gladman DD et al. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1045-8.
36. Psoria'c
Arthri's
Prognos'c
Factors
☛ Progression
of
Damage:
✦
High
effusion
count
at
presenta'on
✦
High
joint
count
at
each
visit
✦
High
medica'on
level
at
presenta'on
✦
Low
ESR
is
“protec've”
☛ Death:
8
Elevated
ESR
8
High
prior
medica'on
level
8
Radiological
Damage
☛ Remission
8 Male
Gender
8 Low
joint
count
at
presenta'on
37. Psoria'c
Arthri's
Not
just
skin
and
joints!
• An
inflammatory
arthri's
associated
with
psoriasis.
• More
common
than
previously
thought.
• About
one
fiKh
of
the
pa'ents
have
a
severe
debilita'ng
disease,
although
some
pa'ents
achieve
remission.
• Earlier
studies
sugges'ng
that
PsA
was
a
mild
disease
included
pa'ents
with
early
disease.