Aaron Zazueta, GEF Evaluation Office
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia during the results-based management session.
Findings Relevant to the GEF IW Learn ConfernceIwl Pcu
The document summarizes the findings of a 2004 study on the GEF International Waters Programme. Some key points:
- The study assessed impacts of projects on transboundary waters, approaches used, and lessons learned to improve operations.
- There were 95 full-sized projects totaling $691.59 million in GEF funding and $1.46 billion in co-financing, indicating a leverage ratio of 1:2.
- The study evaluated projects in regions like the Black Sea, La Plata River, African Great Lakes, and East Asian seas to identify lessons learned and make recommendations to strengthen the program.
7b highlights of the expert meeting to assess progress on na psNAP Events
The document summarizes the highlights of an expert meeting to assess progress on National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). It discusses the scope of the assessment process, which aims to evaluate progress reducing vulnerability to climate change and integrating adaptation into development policies. While developing countries have made progress formulating NAPs, implementation experience is limited. Challenges remain around capacity, vulnerability assessments, gender integration, and tracking effectiveness. The assessment process, using submissions, a questionnaire, and an expert meeting, effectively gathered comprehensive Party inputs to facilitate further progress on NAPs.
The Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) has developed National Adaptation Plan technical guidelines. These guidelines will assist developing countries in producing their National Adaptation Plans in a comprehensive and strategic manner.
More information: http://undp-alm.org/resources/training-tools/national-adaptation-plans-technical-guidelines-nap-process
Presentation on Incorporating DRR issues into the WASH program of the Governm...Shakeb Nabi
This is a study conducted by NARRI (National Alliance for Risk Reduction and Response Initiatives to assess the current WASH program of the Government of Bangladesh and how Disaster Risk Reduction can be incorporated into the same.
The project is being funded by European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection. For further information please contact Shakeb Nabi (nabi.shakeb@gmail.com). Please also visit our website www.narri-bd.org
we also post lots of interesting stuffs on DRR on our facebook (NARRI Bangladesh). We encourage you to become member of the same
The document summarizes discussions from sessions at the NAP Expo on accessing funding from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) for national adaptation plan (NAP) formulation and other adaptation planning processes.
Key points include: an overview of GCF support for NAPs including the status of approved proposals; 10 criteria for successful NAP proposals to the GCF; and a discussion of country experiences accessing GCF funding including from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The sessions also included breakout groups to discuss enhancing sub-national adaptation action and stimulating financing through climate information communication.
3a.1 Good practices in the formulation of NAPs and experience with accessing ...NAP Events
The document summarizes information from a presentation on good practices in formulating National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and accessing support from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) readiness program. It outlines the objectives of the NAP process to build resilience and integrate climate adaptation into policies and development plans. Guidelines for the NAP process developed by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group are available online. Countries have taken different approaches in developing NAP roadmaps and receiving support from bilateral and multilateral organizations. Ongoing challenges in accessing GCF readiness funding include structuring activities over time, building national capacity, and ensuring adaptation approaches align with country priorities.
Findings Relevant to the GEF IW Learn ConfernceIwl Pcu
The document summarizes the findings of a 2004 study on the GEF International Waters Programme. Some key points:
- The study assessed impacts of projects on transboundary waters, approaches used, and lessons learned to improve operations.
- There were 95 full-sized projects totaling $691.59 million in GEF funding and $1.46 billion in co-financing, indicating a leverage ratio of 1:2.
- The study evaluated projects in regions like the Black Sea, La Plata River, African Great Lakes, and East Asian seas to identify lessons learned and make recommendations to strengthen the program.
7b highlights of the expert meeting to assess progress on na psNAP Events
The document summarizes the highlights of an expert meeting to assess progress on National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). It discusses the scope of the assessment process, which aims to evaluate progress reducing vulnerability to climate change and integrating adaptation into development policies. While developing countries have made progress formulating NAPs, implementation experience is limited. Challenges remain around capacity, vulnerability assessments, gender integration, and tracking effectiveness. The assessment process, using submissions, a questionnaire, and an expert meeting, effectively gathered comprehensive Party inputs to facilitate further progress on NAPs.
The Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) has developed National Adaptation Plan technical guidelines. These guidelines will assist developing countries in producing their National Adaptation Plans in a comprehensive and strategic manner.
More information: http://undp-alm.org/resources/training-tools/national-adaptation-plans-technical-guidelines-nap-process
Presentation on Incorporating DRR issues into the WASH program of the Governm...Shakeb Nabi
This is a study conducted by NARRI (National Alliance for Risk Reduction and Response Initiatives to assess the current WASH program of the Government of Bangladesh and how Disaster Risk Reduction can be incorporated into the same.
The project is being funded by European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection. For further information please contact Shakeb Nabi (nabi.shakeb@gmail.com). Please also visit our website www.narri-bd.org
we also post lots of interesting stuffs on DRR on our facebook (NARRI Bangladesh). We encourage you to become member of the same
The document summarizes discussions from sessions at the NAP Expo on accessing funding from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) for national adaptation plan (NAP) formulation and other adaptation planning processes.
Key points include: an overview of GCF support for NAPs including the status of approved proposals; 10 criteria for successful NAP proposals to the GCF; and a discussion of country experiences accessing GCF funding including from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The sessions also included breakout groups to discuss enhancing sub-national adaptation action and stimulating financing through climate information communication.
3a.1 Good practices in the formulation of NAPs and experience with accessing ...NAP Events
The document summarizes information from a presentation on good practices in formulating National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and accessing support from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) readiness program. It outlines the objectives of the NAP process to build resilience and integrate climate adaptation into policies and development plans. Guidelines for the NAP process developed by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group are available online. Countries have taken different approaches in developing NAP roadmaps and receiving support from bilateral and multilateral organizations. Ongoing challenges in accessing GCF readiness funding include structuring activities over time, building national capacity, and ensuring adaptation approaches align with country priorities.
The document discusses two ongoing initiatives at the Global Fund: the Architecture Review and National Strategy Applications. The Architecture Review aims to simplify the Global Fund's processes and support continued growth through a "single stream of funding" model. The National Strategy Applications initiative seeks to increase country ownership by basing applications on validated national strategies. It outlines plans for a first learning wave of NSA applications to begin in 2009 to test the approach before broader implementation.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
The sample NAP process based on the UNFCCC NAP technical guidelinesNAP Events
Presentation by: Sonam Lhaden Khandu
7. The process to formulate and implement NAPs: The sample NAP process based on the UNFCCC NAP technical guidelines (LEG)
As an integral part of the session day’s activities on accessing funding from the GCF, the LEG will present the sample NAP process that has been developed from the NAP technical guidelines. The sample NAP process represents a minimum set of steps and building blocks for an effective process at the national level, and can be found on NAP Central <http: />.
Climate Finance - National Adaptation Plans under the UNFCCC Process - WebinarUNDP Climate
SLYCAN Trust hosted a webinar on December 18 to engage in a discussion on matters pertaining to National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and the processes under the UNFCCC that mandate the provision of technical and financial support for developing countries for the implementation of NAPs. The discussion also entailed decisions and outcomes of COP23, and how it impacts future processes on adaptation activities under various working groups of the UNFCCC process.
Knowledge and awareness WP7 and Capacity development WP6_steven downey_28 augGlobal Water Partnership
This document discusses knowledge and awareness (K&A) and capacity development (CapDev) work packages for the Water and Climate Programme (WCP).
The K&A work package aims to ensure GWP provides cutting-edge knowledge to support integrated water resources management for water security and climate resilience. It will capture existing knowledge, generate new evidence-based knowledge, and disseminate information to stakeholders.
The CapDev work package will build capacity for government planners and GWP teams to develop investments that enhance water security and climate resilience. It will develop training materials and provide on-the-job support to practitioners.
Both work packages establish indicators to monitor outcomes such as the number of knowledge products dissemin
Country Experiences Malawi and Nepal - National Adaptation Plans under the UN...UNDP Climate
This document summarizes the experiences of Malawi and Nepal in developing their National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).
In Malawi, they have completed the first step of the NAP process and some of step two, including developing a NAP roadmap and stocktaking report. Key milestones include launching the process in 2014 and establishing structures for development. Civil society has played an important role by providing resources, expertise, and advocating for vulnerable groups. However, challenges remain around inadequate financing and technical capacity.
In Nepal, the NAP process aims to reduce vulnerability and build resilience through integration into relevant policies and plans. It utilizes existing coordination mechanisms and promotes multi-stakeholder participation. Key elements of the process
This document discusses the role of IMED and project directors in monitoring and evaluation of development projects in Bangladesh. It provides background on IMED, outlining its functions in monitoring ongoing projects through collection of data and field inspections. IMED also conducts evaluations of completed projects through terminal evaluations and impact assessments of selected projects. The document contrasts monitoring as a continuous process to ensure progress against plans, with evaluation as a periodic assessment of outcomes and impacts. It describes various IMED tools and formats used for data collection and monitoring of projects over their life cycles.
This document summarizes a study on strengthening integrated water resources management (IWRM) planning in African lake and river basin organizations (L/RBOs). The study identified several gaps in IWRM planning processes, including a lack of cooperation and strategic planning. It also found needs such as improving stakeholder participation and developing water resources data systems. The study proposed priority actions that ANBO could take over five years, such as fostering regional policy frameworks, building capacity, and strengthening monitoring and evaluation of IWRM implementation. It concluded with recommendations for ANBO to take a flexible, demand-driven approach and ensure coordination across initiatives supporting African L/RBOs.
This document discusses assessing progress towards the global goal on adaptation as part of the Paris Agreement's Global Stocktake process. It outlines key challenges including the difficulty of aggregating national adaptation efforts to determine global progress. Countries face challenges assessing vulnerability, prioritizing actions, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. The document also discusses opportunities to leverage existing frameworks and enhance adaptation action through the stocktake process. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems for adjusting adaptation over time.
Regional Development and RBM: Proposals for improvementGIZ Moldova
The document discusses improving results-based management (RBM) in regional development areas in Moldova. It identifies weaknesses in how results are currently defined and measured in the National Strategy for Regional Development, regional development strategies, and projects. It provides recommendations to strengthen the results focus, including better defining indicators and targets, improving monitoring and evaluation, clarifying the relationship between national and regional strategies, and providing training and support to regional development agencies.
Session 5.1: Programatic approach in building resilienceNAP Events
The document summarizes the key findings of an evaluation of the Climate Investment Funds' programmatic approach to delivering climate finance. Some of the main points are:
1) The programmatic approach helped ensure programs supported transformational change by facilitating inclusive strategic planning linked to predictable funding. This contributed to increased government ownership and awareness of climate issues.
2) The approach was most effective in the investment planning phase, but less so in project implementation. The Pilot Program for Climate Resilience sustained the approach best through monitoring and coordination mechanisms.
3) Effective government leadership and capacity, as well as coordination mechanisms, were important for applying the programmatic approach successfully in both planning and implementation.
Workshop Session I: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assess...icgfmconference
Workshop Session I: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment
Frans Ronsholt, Head, PEFA Secretariat and Franck Bessette, PFM Expert PEFA
Secretariat
The first session presents the background, objectives and activities of the PEFA program as
well as the content and methodology of the PFM Performance Measurement Framework.
The session also discusses implementation issues and global adoption of the Framework
Valuing organizational vision in the development of performance measurement f...Fbertrand
The document discusses two projects to develop performance measurement frameworks for science-based organizations based on their organizational visions.
For a provincial RTO aiming to be a world leader in innovation for its main client, the project used a focused and participatory approach, developing 25 indicators aligned with its strategic plan through workshops.
For a federal RTO aiming to be a top five global RTO, the project took an exploratory and comparative approach, profiling over 100 indicators used by peer RTOs and developing a benchmarking strategy through international consultations.
Key lessons highlighted how an organization's vision influences the project approach, methods and results, and implications for implementing and using the performance frameworks.
Workshop Session II: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Asses...icgfmconference
Workshop Session II: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment
Frans Ronsholt, Head, PEFA Secretariat and Franck Bessette, PFM Expert PEFA
Secretariat
The second session looks at the potential for use of PFM assessments based on the PEFA
Framework for reform formulation, country comparison and monitoring of reform results
over time. Each session will be completed with a small case study for participants to work.
The need for improvement in Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (...John Leonardo
This presentation investigates why repeated Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments of some government public financial management (PFM) systems often result in continuing low scores for some PFM performance indicators (PIs). It highlights the importance of good PFM and suggests the ongoing recording of low PI scores in numerous repeated PEFA assessments may arise because the identification of the broader institutional causes of poor PFM performance is currently excluded from the PEFA methodology. Consequently, PFM reform programmes designed at present following PEFA assessments may not necessarily address the institutional causes of poor PFM performance. A change to the PEFA methodology is recommended by way of the introduction of wider institutional assessments, where appropriate, to ensure action is taken in PFM reform programmes to tackle identified institutional causes of poor PFM performance.
11.3.3 Experiencing on enhancing institutional arrangements and support for t...NAP Events
The document identifies needs for national adaptation plans (NAPs) based on stocktaking exercises and country contexts. Key needs include strengthening coordination, conducting vulnerability assessments, integrating adaptation into planning processes, and establishing budgets and implementation mechanisms. The NAP Global Support Programme addresses these needs through regional training workshops, knowledge sharing, and tools to promote NAP development and implementation. However, challenges persist around limited data and capacity as well as insufficient domestic and international financing.
WCP measuring progress – indicators, milestones and targets ralph philip 27 augGlobal Water Partnership
The document outlines the Global Water & Climate Programme's results framework for measuring progress towards targets through indicators, milestones, and targets. It provides the planning and monitoring & evaluation framework for projects under the Programme. Key components include a generic logframe with indicators for outputs, outcomes and impacts; targets set for 2016 with milestones in 2014-2015; and examples of selected indicators and targets for the Water & Climate Programme in Africa.
Adaptive Management in the Danube River Basin (Weller/Zavadsky) [IWC4 Present...Iwl Pcu
The document discusses adaptive management in the Danube River Basin. It notes that the basin covers 10% of Europe, includes 19 countries and 81 million inhabitants, and has historical differences and economic disparities. Key problems in the basin include nutrient pollution, loss of wetlands, and the need for transboundary cooperation. The challenges are strengthening institutions, addressing legal framework disparities, and evolving strategies over time. The approach takes an adaptive management strategy through close cooperation with the ICPDR and supporting non-EU countries equally. Innovations include technical solutions to support policy, pilot demonstrations, tools to reform tariffs and strategies, and assessing the Danube's impact on the Black Sea. Fulfilling political, operational, and communication requirements can
Key outputs: monitoring, legal documents, photo collections, pilot management plans, draft plans of actions, reports on state of wetlands. Presentation given during the Black Sea Ecosystem Recovery Project's Final Seminar in Istanbul, Turkey from 14-15 February 2008.
The GEF IW Learning Portfolio of Projects: Combined Presentation at the IWC5Iwl Pcu
Combined presentation of the GEF International Waters Learning portfolio during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia (during the host region project results and expectations session).
Including:
Legal and Institutional Frameworks project in Transboundary Waters Management
Presenter: Richard Paisley, University of British Columbia
Science-Based Understanding
Presenter: Dansie Andrew, United Nations University-INWEH
Nutrient Reduction Best Practices in Central/Eastern Europe
Presenter: Chuck Chaitovitz, Global Environment and Technology Foundation
Transboundary Waters Assessment Programme
Presenter: Elina Rautalahti, UN Environment Programme
ICPDR-CTI IW:LEARN Learning Exchange Program
Presenter: Phillip Weller, Executive Secretary, International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River
GEF IW:LEARN
Presenters: Sean Khan, UN Enironment Programme and Mish Hamid (CTI IW:LEARN)
The document discusses two ongoing initiatives at the Global Fund: the Architecture Review and National Strategy Applications. The Architecture Review aims to simplify the Global Fund's processes and support continued growth through a "single stream of funding" model. The National Strategy Applications initiative seeks to increase country ownership by basing applications on validated national strategies. It outlines plans for a first learning wave of NSA applications to begin in 2009 to test the approach before broader implementation.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & G...Tariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
The sample NAP process based on the UNFCCC NAP technical guidelinesNAP Events
Presentation by: Sonam Lhaden Khandu
7. The process to formulate and implement NAPs: The sample NAP process based on the UNFCCC NAP technical guidelines (LEG)
As an integral part of the session day’s activities on accessing funding from the GCF, the LEG will present the sample NAP process that has been developed from the NAP technical guidelines. The sample NAP process represents a minimum set of steps and building blocks for an effective process at the national level, and can be found on NAP Central <http: />.
Climate Finance - National Adaptation Plans under the UNFCCC Process - WebinarUNDP Climate
SLYCAN Trust hosted a webinar on December 18 to engage in a discussion on matters pertaining to National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and the processes under the UNFCCC that mandate the provision of technical and financial support for developing countries for the implementation of NAPs. The discussion also entailed decisions and outcomes of COP23, and how it impacts future processes on adaptation activities under various working groups of the UNFCCC process.
Knowledge and awareness WP7 and Capacity development WP6_steven downey_28 augGlobal Water Partnership
This document discusses knowledge and awareness (K&A) and capacity development (CapDev) work packages for the Water and Climate Programme (WCP).
The K&A work package aims to ensure GWP provides cutting-edge knowledge to support integrated water resources management for water security and climate resilience. It will capture existing knowledge, generate new evidence-based knowledge, and disseminate information to stakeholders.
The CapDev work package will build capacity for government planners and GWP teams to develop investments that enhance water security and climate resilience. It will develop training materials and provide on-the-job support to practitioners.
Both work packages establish indicators to monitor outcomes such as the number of knowledge products dissemin
Country Experiences Malawi and Nepal - National Adaptation Plans under the UN...UNDP Climate
This document summarizes the experiences of Malawi and Nepal in developing their National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).
In Malawi, they have completed the first step of the NAP process and some of step two, including developing a NAP roadmap and stocktaking report. Key milestones include launching the process in 2014 and establishing structures for development. Civil society has played an important role by providing resources, expertise, and advocating for vulnerable groups. However, challenges remain around inadequate financing and technical capacity.
In Nepal, the NAP process aims to reduce vulnerability and build resilience through integration into relevant policies and plans. It utilizes existing coordination mechanisms and promotes multi-stakeholder participation. Key elements of the process
This document discusses the role of IMED and project directors in monitoring and evaluation of development projects in Bangladesh. It provides background on IMED, outlining its functions in monitoring ongoing projects through collection of data and field inspections. IMED also conducts evaluations of completed projects through terminal evaluations and impact assessments of selected projects. The document contrasts monitoring as a continuous process to ensure progress against plans, with evaluation as a periodic assessment of outcomes and impacts. It describes various IMED tools and formats used for data collection and monitoring of projects over their life cycles.
This document summarizes a study on strengthening integrated water resources management (IWRM) planning in African lake and river basin organizations (L/RBOs). The study identified several gaps in IWRM planning processes, including a lack of cooperation and strategic planning. It also found needs such as improving stakeholder participation and developing water resources data systems. The study proposed priority actions that ANBO could take over five years, such as fostering regional policy frameworks, building capacity, and strengthening monitoring and evaluation of IWRM implementation. It concluded with recommendations for ANBO to take a flexible, demand-driven approach and ensure coordination across initiatives supporting African L/RBOs.
This document discusses assessing progress towards the global goal on adaptation as part of the Paris Agreement's Global Stocktake process. It outlines key challenges including the difficulty of aggregating national adaptation efforts to determine global progress. Countries face challenges assessing vulnerability, prioritizing actions, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. The document also discusses opportunities to leverage existing frameworks and enhance adaptation action through the stocktake process. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems for adjusting adaptation over time.
Regional Development and RBM: Proposals for improvementGIZ Moldova
The document discusses improving results-based management (RBM) in regional development areas in Moldova. It identifies weaknesses in how results are currently defined and measured in the National Strategy for Regional Development, regional development strategies, and projects. It provides recommendations to strengthen the results focus, including better defining indicators and targets, improving monitoring and evaluation, clarifying the relationship between national and regional strategies, and providing training and support to regional development agencies.
Session 5.1: Programatic approach in building resilienceNAP Events
The document summarizes the key findings of an evaluation of the Climate Investment Funds' programmatic approach to delivering climate finance. Some of the main points are:
1) The programmatic approach helped ensure programs supported transformational change by facilitating inclusive strategic planning linked to predictable funding. This contributed to increased government ownership and awareness of climate issues.
2) The approach was most effective in the investment planning phase, but less so in project implementation. The Pilot Program for Climate Resilience sustained the approach best through monitoring and coordination mechanisms.
3) Effective government leadership and capacity, as well as coordination mechanisms, were important for applying the programmatic approach successfully in both planning and implementation.
Workshop Session I: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assess...icgfmconference
Workshop Session I: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment
Frans Ronsholt, Head, PEFA Secretariat and Franck Bessette, PFM Expert PEFA
Secretariat
The first session presents the background, objectives and activities of the PEFA program as
well as the content and methodology of the PFM Performance Measurement Framework.
The session also discusses implementation issues and global adoption of the Framework
Valuing organizational vision in the development of performance measurement f...Fbertrand
The document discusses two projects to develop performance measurement frameworks for science-based organizations based on their organizational visions.
For a provincial RTO aiming to be a world leader in innovation for its main client, the project used a focused and participatory approach, developing 25 indicators aligned with its strategic plan through workshops.
For a federal RTO aiming to be a top five global RTO, the project took an exploratory and comparative approach, profiling over 100 indicators used by peer RTOs and developing a benchmarking strategy through international consultations.
Key lessons highlighted how an organization's vision influences the project approach, methods and results, and implications for implementing and using the performance frameworks.
Workshop Session II: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Asses...icgfmconference
Workshop Session II: Public Expenditure Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment
Frans Ronsholt, Head, PEFA Secretariat and Franck Bessette, PFM Expert PEFA
Secretariat
The second session looks at the potential for use of PFM assessments based on the PEFA
Framework for reform formulation, country comparison and monitoring of reform results
over time. Each session will be completed with a small case study for participants to work.
The need for improvement in Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (...John Leonardo
This presentation investigates why repeated Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments of some government public financial management (PFM) systems often result in continuing low scores for some PFM performance indicators (PIs). It highlights the importance of good PFM and suggests the ongoing recording of low PI scores in numerous repeated PEFA assessments may arise because the identification of the broader institutional causes of poor PFM performance is currently excluded from the PEFA methodology. Consequently, PFM reform programmes designed at present following PEFA assessments may not necessarily address the institutional causes of poor PFM performance. A change to the PEFA methodology is recommended by way of the introduction of wider institutional assessments, where appropriate, to ensure action is taken in PFM reform programmes to tackle identified institutional causes of poor PFM performance.
11.3.3 Experiencing on enhancing institutional arrangements and support for t...NAP Events
The document identifies needs for national adaptation plans (NAPs) based on stocktaking exercises and country contexts. Key needs include strengthening coordination, conducting vulnerability assessments, integrating adaptation into planning processes, and establishing budgets and implementation mechanisms. The NAP Global Support Programme addresses these needs through regional training workshops, knowledge sharing, and tools to promote NAP development and implementation. However, challenges persist around limited data and capacity as well as insufficient domestic and international financing.
WCP measuring progress – indicators, milestones and targets ralph philip 27 augGlobal Water Partnership
The document outlines the Global Water & Climate Programme's results framework for measuring progress towards targets through indicators, milestones, and targets. It provides the planning and monitoring & evaluation framework for projects under the Programme. Key components include a generic logframe with indicators for outputs, outcomes and impacts; targets set for 2016 with milestones in 2014-2015; and examples of selected indicators and targets for the Water & Climate Programme in Africa.
Adaptive Management in the Danube River Basin (Weller/Zavadsky) [IWC4 Present...Iwl Pcu
The document discusses adaptive management in the Danube River Basin. It notes that the basin covers 10% of Europe, includes 19 countries and 81 million inhabitants, and has historical differences and economic disparities. Key problems in the basin include nutrient pollution, loss of wetlands, and the need for transboundary cooperation. The challenges are strengthening institutions, addressing legal framework disparities, and evolving strategies over time. The approach takes an adaptive management strategy through close cooperation with the ICPDR and supporting non-EU countries equally. Innovations include technical solutions to support policy, pilot demonstrations, tools to reform tariffs and strategies, and assessing the Danube's impact on the Black Sea. Fulfilling political, operational, and communication requirements can
Key outputs: monitoring, legal documents, photo collections, pilot management plans, draft plans of actions, reports on state of wetlands. Presentation given during the Black Sea Ecosystem Recovery Project's Final Seminar in Istanbul, Turkey from 14-15 February 2008.
The GEF IW Learning Portfolio of Projects: Combined Presentation at the IWC5Iwl Pcu
Combined presentation of the GEF International Waters Learning portfolio during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia (during the host region project results and expectations session).
Including:
Legal and Institutional Frameworks project in Transboundary Waters Management
Presenter: Richard Paisley, University of British Columbia
Science-Based Understanding
Presenter: Dansie Andrew, United Nations University-INWEH
Nutrient Reduction Best Practices in Central/Eastern Europe
Presenter: Chuck Chaitovitz, Global Environment and Technology Foundation
Transboundary Waters Assessment Programme
Presenter: Elina Rautalahti, UN Environment Programme
ICPDR-CTI IW:LEARN Learning Exchange Program
Presenter: Phillip Weller, Executive Secretary, International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River
GEF IW:LEARN
Presenters: Sean Khan, UN Enironment Programme and Mish Hamid (CTI IW:LEARN)
Sustainable livelihoods in Milne Bay: Eco-tourism versus logging (IWC5 Pres...Iwl Pcu
This document discusses sustainable livelihood strategies for communities in Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea, comparing eco-tourism and logging. It finds that an eco-tourism venture in one village provided greater annual cash benefits and income per capita than a logging operation. However, the analysis does not consider ecological costs and benefits, feedback effects on natural resources, or dynamics over time. While eco-tourism built social capital and linked economic activity to biodiversity protection more strongly, its benefits were marginalized as focus shifted elsewhere. The document calls for considering broader networks and system dynamics to fully evaluate different livelihood options.
Outcomes of the institutional review of the Black Sea Commission: implementat...Iwl Pcu
Presentation given during the Final Seminar of the Black Sea Ecosystem Recovery Project, from 14-15 February 2008 in Istanbul.
Ahmet Kideys
Executive Director
Black Sea Commission
Translating the UNECE Water Convention into Practise: Concluding Agreements ...Iwl Pcu
The document discusses international river basin management and cooperation between riparian states. It provides examples of two major international river basin commissions - the Danube River Basin Commission and Rhine River Basin Commission. The commissions were established through bilateral or multilateral agreements between states per Article 9 of the UNECE Water Convention. They work to facilitate cooperation on issues like water quality, quantity, and flood protection in transboundary basins.
Guinea Current LME Strategic Action Programme (IWC5 Presentation)Iwl Pcu
Stephen Maxwell Donkor, Interim Guinea Current Commission and Christian Susan, UNIDO
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia during the project management workshop on TDA-SAP Development.
Towards a Methodology for Assessment of Internationally Shared Aquifers (IWC5...Iwl Pcu
Neno Kukuric, IGRAC
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia (during the pre-conference workshop for freshwater ecosystems, Global Changes and Water Resources Workshop).
Joint Monitoring and Assessment in transboundary basins: obligations and expe...Iwl Pcu
This document discusses joint monitoring and assessment of transboundary basins under the UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Helsinki Convention). It provides an overview of different levels of cooperation, including the international level with guidelines developed by the Convention, as well as national and transboundary basin levels. Specific examples of regulations and agreements between Hungary and neighboring countries like Romania and Slovakia are outlined. Lessons learned emphasize the importance of cooperation across institutions and translation of documents to facilitate joint monitoring and assessment of surface and groundwater resources in transboundary basins.
Guinea Current Large Marine Ecosystem Marine Management and Governance (IWC5 ...Iwl Pcu
Christian Susan, UNIDO Water Management Unit
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia (during the pre-conference workshop marine ecosystems, Global Change and Marine Resources).
Monitoring Coral Reef Marine Protected Areas (IWC5 Presentation)Iwl Pcu
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia (during the pre-conference workshop marine ecosystems, Global Change and Marine Resources).
Clive Wilkinson
The document discusses the Pacific Islands Oceanic Fisheries Management Project and Integrated Water Resources Management projects. It aims to support the sustainable development and management of international waters in Pacific island countries. The projects work on issues such as overfishing, pollution, and inadequate water management. They implement solutions like integrated coastal zone management, fisheries management, and demonstrations of best practices in watershed management, wastewater treatment, and sustainable groundwater use. The projects have made progress but still need to focus more on national implementation, awareness raising, and long-term capacity building.
INSTITUTIONAL MAPPING OF THE SAN JUAN RIVER BASINIwl Pcu
The document discusses the San Juan River Basin, which spans Costa Rica and Nicaragua. It outlines the institutional organization that was established to formulate a Strategic Action Program (SAP) for the basin. A steering committee oversees technical units in each country and consultative committees that include government agencies, NGOs, municipalities, and international organizations. The formulation of the SAP involves baseline studies, demonstration projects, public participation workshops, and thematic dialogues to develop programs and projects. The execution of the SAP will rely on both bottom-up multi-stakeholder alliances and top-down regional integration.
This is part of the report on the 15 Years of UNDP/GEF in the Black Sea Region presented on 14-15 February 2008 in Istanbul, Turkey.
Contents:
Exit Strategy;
Why Exit Strategy?;
Overview of BSERP outputs;
Recommendations on Outstanding Issues and Transfer of Goods.
Presented by Yegor Volovik
The Regional Environmental Center provided small grants totaling 150,000 EUR to support 55 projects run by NGOs in 6 Central and Eastern European countries along the Danube River. The grants aimed to enable NGOs to contribute to pollution reduction, raise environmental awareness, and strengthen cooperation. Projects addressed issues like nature protection, water quality research and monitoring, and policymaking. However, high demand showed a need for more funding to support regional cooperation and address wider environmental issues in the Danube countries.
Methods used to place values when markets are weak or missing: non-use values, contingent valuation, hedonic pricing, issues and limitations.
Morteza Rahmatian
The document provides a preliminary evaluation of Bangladesh's Aid Effectiveness Project, finding that while the project has experienced delays and inefficiencies, important milestones have been achieved including developing an aid management information system (AIMS), conducting capacity assessments, and drafting an aid policy outline. The evaluation rates the project's effectiveness positively but notes the long-term nature of aid effectiveness requires sustained commitment beyond the life of the project.
Final outline plan for webinar evaluation and impact assessment mof 2004 EricaPackingtonIOD
This document provides guidance for consultants conducting evaluations and impact assessments of WaterAid's Governance and Transparency Fund (GTF) programme. It outlines the purpose and key stakeholders for the evaluation and impact assessment. Consultants have 25 days to complete both exercises. The evaluation will assess programme performance against objectives, while the impact assessment focuses on understanding changes in people's lives resulting from the programme. Guidance is provided on evaluation questions, methodology, timelines, and the differences between evaluations and impact assessments. Countries will take different approaches depending on whether a full or small-scale evaluation is required.
The document discusses several GEF policies that were approved or updated during the GEF-6 period, including the GEF Programmatic Approach, Project Cancellation Policy, Co-financing Policy, Non-Grant Instrument Policy, Gender Mainstreaming Policy, and Public Involvement Policy. It provides details on the objectives and key aspects of each policy, such as establishing a program framework document and commitment deadline for the programmatic approach, the phased cancellation of projects that are delayed, and defining co-financing for GEF projects. It also describes the GEF-6 Non-Grant Instrument Pilot that aims to leverage private capital and test non-grant instruments for public sectors.
The document discusses defining partnerships between the Global Fund and other organizations. It recommends that the Global Fund more explicitly define partnership expectations and roles. A thorough examination is needed of all aspects of partnerships related to technical assistance and grant implementation. Key findings are that the Global Fund partnership model is a work in progress and better delineation of responsibilities is required between organizations. The Global Fund is working to strengthen partnerships through developing a partnership strategy and operationalizing agreements with partners.
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversightepass2015
The document discusses the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and outlines its role in financing projects that benefit global environmental issues. It then summarizes UNDP's responsibilities in implementing GEF-funded projects, including delegation of authority, monitoring and evaluation, and reporting. The document also provides an overview of the typical project cycle from approval through closure. It emphasizes the importance of adaptive management and being responsive to changes during implementation. Key aspects of reporting progress like inception reports and annual project implementation reviews are also summarized. Finally, the document outlines UNDP's risk management system for GEF projects.
Key findings, lessons learned and next steps for TrackFinTrackFin
The TrackFin initiative aims to develop a standardized methodology for tracking financing for water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) at the national level. Pilot projects in Brazil, Ghana, and Morocco found that comprehensive WASH financing data could be collected using this process. The methodology needs refinement based on lessons learned. Next steps include expanding the number of participating countries, providing training and support, and coordinating TrackFin with other global monitoring tools to better understand financing needs for achieving sector goals.
Objective: Developing a comprehensive M&E system for IW projects that ensures an
integrated system for information gathering and assessment throughout the lifespan of a project.
This document presents a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tool called the PEG M&E tool for assessing progress, effectiveness, and gaps in national adaptation plan (NAP) processes. The tool was designed to monitor the overall NAP process using metrics related to process, input, output, outcome, and impact. It is based on the ten essential functions of NAP processes as defined by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group. The document provides an overview of the tool and its principles, as well as examples of metrics that could be used to evaluate specific essential functions of a country's NAP process. Participants at the workshop were then asked to apply elements of the tool to evaluate the NAP process of a selected
The OECD developed a composite indicator to identify green budgeting practices across 14 OECD countries. The indicator assessed countries based on 4 building blocks: strategic framework, tools and methods, accountability and transparency, and enabling environment. Most countries have some practices in place, like strategic plans, environmental impact assessments, and training programs. The OECD will refine the indicator based on country feedback and update it annually to track the evolution of green budgeting over time. The indicator aims to help countries learn from each other's approaches and advance green budgeting.
This document summarizes three Integrated Approach Pilots (IAPs) that are being implemented by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The IAPs aim to deliver global environmental benefits across multiple focal areas and support sustainable development. One IAP focuses on reducing deforestation in commodity supply chains in several countries. A second addresses food security in sub-Saharan Africa across 10-12 countries. A third supports sustainable cities. The document provides details on the objectives, components, countries involved, and programming process for each IAP.
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...NAP Events
Presented by: Thinley Namgyel
8.3 Monitoring and evaluation
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
Introduction to the NAP Global Network Webinar Series | Sector Integration in...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Hayley Price-Kelly, IISD, introducing the NAP Global Network webinar series and the topic "Sector Integration in the NAP Process: A Spectrum of Approaches."
You can watch a recording of the webinar here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCTfrhYx13o&feature=youtu.be
The document provides information on national adaptation plans (NAPs), including:
1. An overview of COP decisions related to NAPs from 2010 to 2016 that have established guidelines and support for the NAP process.
2. Details on the objectives of NAPs, which include reducing vulnerability to climate change impacts and integrating adaptation into development plans.
3. A sample process for formulating and implementing NAPs that includes activities such as assessing climate risks, identifying adaptation options, and developing an implementation strategy.
To push the preparation of national project proposals within the regional context: Governments and donors advocacy for more investment in controlling FMD - To present an overview of the Logical Framework approach and discuss it as a possible model for the preparation of national project proposals.
Including Key messages for advocacy as well as an explanation of
The OIE PVS Pathway.
J. Domenech
On behalf of the GF TADs Working Group
Item 2: Global Soil Partnership - accomplishment, challenges and way forward:...Soils FAO-GSP
The document discusses the accomplishments and challenges of the Global Soil Partnership (GSP) and provides recommendations for its future work. It states that the GSP has been successful in raising awareness of soil issues, creating a global soil information system, and developing knowledge products. However, it notes that more work needs to be done to translate these global achievements into action at regional and national levels. The document concludes by recommending that the GSP reformulate its strategy to focus on concrete soil protection actions, establish a program and resource mobilization unit, explore becoming a more formal FAO body, and strengthen partnerships and regional/national engagement.
GEF's Support and Experience on Capacity Building for Transparency GEF''s, Du...OECD Environment
Capacity building is integral to the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) support for mitigation projects. The GEF has provided $118.9 million for mitigation capacity building in 2015. Capacity building is also a core part of GEF support across all of its focal areas and is highly integrated into project design. The GEF's support for capacity building helps to strengthen institutions, improve strategies and policies, and enable action at the national level over the long term. This includes support for national communications, biennial update reports, nationally determined contributions, and the new Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency.
Pecha Kucha format presentation about innovative tools being developed by the GEF-UNEP Flood and Drought Management Tools project, by Raul Glotzbach in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Pecha Kucha format presentation about innovative solutions being deployed by the Caribbean Wastewater Project (Revolving Fund) GEF-IADB/UNEP, by Alfredo Coelloin the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...Iwl Pcu
This document provides an overview of large marine ecosystems (LMEs) and efforts to implement ecosystem-based management (EBM) of LMEs. It notes that LMEs produce 80% of global fisheries catches and contribute $12.6 trillion annually to the global economy. The document outlines the five module assessment approach used for LMEs, including productivity, fish/fisheries, pollution, socioeconomics, and governance. It discusses how the Global Environment Facility has provided $6.01 billion since 1994 to support EBM planning and implementation projects in 22 LMEs. The LME approach is now the cornerstone of the GEF's ocean management strategy.
Slides used during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference, to explain how to understand and communicate with an audience better when presenting.
Presentation by Chris O'Brien, of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference. The presentations focuses on how to create effective powerpoint slides.
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)Iwl Pcu
Presentation by Professor Sevvandi Jajakody, of the Wayamba University(Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Presentation by Chris O'Brien, of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Bay of Bengal LME project) during the science to communication workshop in the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Presentation by Peter Whalley, International Nitrogen Management System GEF- UNEP project providing an introduction to the nitrogen roundtable at the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters conference
Presentation by Hugh Walton of the GEF-UNDP Pacific Fisheries project 4746 at the 8th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
GEF Pillar 1.2 Promoting Transformational Change in Major Global Industries
Hugh Walton – Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
Background - The FFA region
GEF OFMP – 2001 – 2004 & 2005 – 2011
Evaluation in the context of transformational change
OFMP 2 – 2015 – 2019 – Setting the stage for institutional change
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1Iwl Pcu
This document discusses the development of a Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA). It outlines the steps to develop the TDA, including defining system boundaries, collecting and analyzing data, identifying and prioritizing transboundary problems, determining the impacts of priority problems, analyzing causes of problems, and developing thematic reports. It also discusses that the TDA provides factual basis for the strategic planning component and should involve engagement with stakeholders throughout the process. Finally, it notes that the TDA development team should be representative of participating countries and stakeholders.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10Iwl Pcu
This document provides information about governance analysis as part of the TDA/SAP process. It defines governance as the process of decision-making and implementation. Governance analysis examines the key aspects of political, economic, and civil society processes. It focuses on the dynamics of these relationships. There is no agreed approach, and the type of analysis will depend on the cultural, political, and social structures of the countries involved. The governance analysis should consider the decision-making, institutional, policy, and civil society arrangements that influence economic and political decisions affecting the issues being analyzed. The document provides advice to go beyond formal structures and understand informal dynamics and relationships.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10Iwl Pcu
This document provides information about governance analysis as part of the TDA/SAP process. It defines governance as the process of decision-making and implementation. Governance analysis examines the key aspects of political, economic, and civil society processes. It focuses on the dynamics of these relationships. There is no agreed approach, and the type of analysis will depend on the cultural, political, and social structures of the countries involved. The governance analysis should consider decision-making processes, institutional structures, policy frameworks, economic arrangements, and civil society arrangements. Advice is given to use existing assessments, go beyond formal structures, attend coordination meetings, and interview long-time staff to understand informal dynamics.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9Iwl Pcu
This document provides guidance on drafting a Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA). It discusses integrating various parts of the TDA, such as thematic reports, studies, and stakeholder analyses. It recommends that a TDA should be concise and easy to understand, with an executive summary, main text, supporting data/figures, maps, a content list, and acknowledgements. Technical reports can be annexed. The TDA size typically ranges from 80-150 pages. Preliminary recommendations for the Strategic Action Program can be included. The TDA should be reviewed by stakeholders and adopted by the steering committee, though government acceptance is also often required.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
1) This training module covers developing the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), which involves determining the environmental and socio-economic impacts of priority transboundary problems.
2) Environmental impacts are effects on ecosystem integrity, while socio-economic impacts are changes in human welfare from environmental problems.
3) A two-step process is used to determine impacts: 1) Identifying impacts of each problem through a workshop, and 2) Qualitatively or quantitatively describing key impacts through available data and information.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
1) This training module covers developing the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), which involves determining the environmental and socio-economic impacts of priority transboundary problems.
2) Environmental impacts are effects on ecosystem integrity, while socio-economic impacts are changes in human welfare from environmental impacts or problems.
3) A process for determining impacts involves identifying them for each problem, and qualitatively or quantitatively describing key impacts.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
1) This training module covers developing the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), which involves determining the environmental and socio-economic impacts of priority transboundary problems.
2) Environmental impacts are effects on ecosystem integrity, while socio-economic impacts are changes in human welfare from environmental impacts or problems.
3) A two-step process is outlined for determining impacts: 1) Identifying impacts of each problem through a workshop, and 2) Qualitatively or quantitatively describing key impacts through available data and information.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7Iwl Pcu
This document provides guidance on developing thematic reports for a Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA). Thematic reports are the main source of supporting information for the TDA and are drafted by national experts. The document outlines a two-step process for developing the reports: 1) key areas and national experts are identified based on prioritized transboundary problems, and 2) reports are drafted and reviewed by the TDA development team. Examples of thematic reports from previous TDAs are provided. Advice is given to allow sufficient time for reports, ensure appropriate expertise, and develop clear terms of reference.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
1) This training module covers developing the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), which involves determining the environmental and socio-economic impacts of priority transboundary problems.
2) Environmental impacts are effects on ecosystem integrity, while socio-economic impacts are changes in human welfare from environmental problems.
3) A two-step process is outlined for determining impacts: 1) Identifying impacts of each problem through a workshop, and 2) Qualitatively or quantitatively describing key impacts through available data and information.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6Iwl Pcu
This document provides an overview of causal chain analysis (CCA) as part of the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA) process. It defines CCA as examining the linear cause and effect relationships between the causes of a problem and its impacts. The key components of a causal chain are described as the immediate, underlying, and root causes. A stepwise process for developing causal chains is outlined, including identifying the chain components and further developing the chains with data. Examples of completed causal chains for different regions are also presented.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
1) This training module covers developing the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA), which involves determining the environmental and socio-economic impacts of priority transboundary problems.
2) Environmental impacts are effects on ecosystem integrity, while socio-economic impacts are changes in human welfare from environmental problems.
3) A two-step process is outlined for determining impacts: 1) Identifying impacts of each problem through a workshop, and 2) Qualitatively or quantitatively describing key impacts through available data and information.
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
Progress towards Results: Overall Performance Study of the GEF (IWC5 Presentation)
1. Progress towards ResultsProgress towards Results
Overall Performance Study of the GEFOverall Performance Study of the GEF
Aaron ZazuetaAaron Zazueta
GEF Evaluation OfficeGEF Evaluation Office
2. IntroductionIntroduction
OPS4 is an independent study to assess the extent to which the
GEF is achieving its objectives and to identify potential
improvements.
OPS4 is a working document of the 5th
Replenishment of the GEF
and will be presented to the Assembly in May 2010.
Final report was presented to the third replenishment meeting, 13-
14 October, 2009.
2
3. ScopeScope
16 key questions identified in ToR (in: www.gefeo.org)
All projects and project proposals until June 30, 2009 were studied:
• 2,389 finished, on-going and approved projects: $ 8,772 M.
• Project Terminal evaluations since OPS3: 215.
OPS4 built on OPS3, 24 evaluation reports of the Evaluation Office,
and evidence from:
• 57 countries, visited after OPS3
• 9 special country case studies
• 10 additional project visits
• Literature and desk reviews, interviews, surveys
Consultations with representatives of all stakeholders
3
4. LimitationsLimitations
All 16 key questions answered, but varying degrees of depth;
Need more work on:
• The involvement of civil society and the private sector in the
GEF
• Resources management in the GEF
• Cost-effectiveness
• Impact analysis – project oriented
Two major evaluations of the Evaluation Office have led to on-going
reform processes:
• The reform of the project cycle; positive indications but it is too
soon for an evaluative judgments
• The reform of the RAF
Impact evidence in the GEF is still limited to the 3 implementing
agencies: World Bank, UNDP and UNEP.
4
5. Report overviewReport overview
GEF in a Changing World
• International Context
• Resource Mobilization
• Convention Guidance
• The Catalytic Nature of the GEF
• Programming Resources
Progress toward Impact
• From Hypothesis to Evidence
• Focal Area and Multi Focal Area Progress
Issues affecting Results
• Performance
• The GEF as a Learning Organization
• Resources Management
Governance and Partnership
The full document, annexes, methodological and technical documents
related to OPS4 can be found in www.gefeo.org
5
6. OPS4 Main conclusions (1)OPS4 Main conclusions (1)
Funding gap:
• International funding gap on global environmental problems
• GEF Replenishments led to less funds in real terms
• GEF now has more Focal Areas, more guidance, and more
countries
The GEF contributed to progress toward impact
• 70% of finished projects see progress toward global
environmental benefits,
• further follow-up action from national partners is essential to
achieve global environmental benefits
GEF project performance is satisfactory
• the GEF projects are effective in producing outcomes,
• the average score over the GEF-4 period of 80% exceeding the
international benchmark of 75%
6
7. OPS4 Main conclusions (2)OPS4 Main conclusions (2)
The efficiency of the GEF can and should be further improved
• emphasis on programming,
• less time spent on project identification,
• enhanced fee structure,
• more integrated learning (look at lessons from IW Learn),
• results-based management framework that includes progress to
impact measurements (logframes, tracking tools, impact )
“Inability to deliver” is a perception linked to pre-approval phase
• reform processes are underway and show promise
• GEF should move from focal area programming toward programming
on a national level
The GEF partnership brings added value – its tensions need to be
resolved
Governance is adequate but could improve
• Substantive role of Assembly / meet more often
• Clearer delineation of governance/management roles
7
8. OPS4 recommendationsOPS4 recommendations
Interaction between the GEF and the conventions need to be
improved.
Improvements in resource management should focus on
• developing a new system for reserving funds for project ideas
• reforming fiduciary standards and the fee system
The GEF Council should address tensions within the GEF
partnership and provide guidance on roles and responsibilities.
If the GEF-5 replenishment recommendations include strong
proposals concerning programming, efficiency and partnership,
OPS4 supports the highest level of replenishment for the GEF.
8
10. BackgroundBackground
Long-term objectives:
• Foster international, multi-state cooperation on priority
transboundary enbironmental concerns through more
comprehensive, ecosystem-based approaches to management.
• Play a catalytic role in addressing transboundary water concerns
by assisting countries to utilize the full range of technical
assistance, economic, financial, regulatory and institutional
reforms that are needed.
No Convention
Importance of diagnosis (TDA) and the strategic programming
(SAP)
Foundation / Demonstration / investment
10
11. Conclusions (1)Conclusions (1)
Rising challenges make GEFs IW work highly relevant.
GEF has provided important support to new and existing
international agreements for the protection of
International Waters
• Helped set the stage for national policies that
reduce environmental stress.
11
12. Conclusions (2)Conclusions (2)
GEF is contributing towards the reduction of pollution
and other stresses (such as overfishing) in international
water bodies.
23 Terminal Evaluations were examined
• 8 demonstrated stress reduction
• 7 achieved promising intermediary stages and
outcomes
• 8 not designed for impacts (Global projects) or
where Foundational (too early to assess)
12
13. Review of Outcomes to Impacts (ROtI)Review of Outcomes to Impacts (ROtI)
Based on 23 Terminal Evaluations.
13
.
state /
condition
Outputs
Reduced
Threat to
GEB
Enhance
dStatus
of GEB:
Outcomes
IMPACT
Assumption Assumption Assumption
state /
condition
ThreatsBasedAnalysisOutcomes-ImpactsTOCAnalysisProject LogFrame Analysis
14. Factors that affect progress towards impactFactors that affect progress towards impact
Relevance to national priorities (sustainable financial support)
Engagement with industrial and agricultural interests and other
sectors.
Robust understanding of Ecosystem Services (scientifically sound
diagnostics such as TDAs)
Projects in which not all important catchment countries participate
face more difficulties in moving towards GEB
Absence of baselines and weak monitoring makes it more difficult to
determine long-term impacts
14
15. RecommendationsRecommendations
IW impact analysis need to be done at the water body or catchment
level
• Need to examine combined effects of phased and concurrent
projects
Focus on involving all countries in a catchment area before
investment stage, while continuing to support all participating
countries
Other Focal Areas should consider IWs Phased Approach
(Foundation, Demonstration, Investment) when appropriate
15
16. Recommendations (2)Recommendations (2)
GEF should draw lessons from the IW Learn Initiative when
developing a Knowledge Management approach across Agencies
and Focal Areas
Continue to develop and integrate tools for RBM ( Logframes,
tracking tools and emerging evidence on impact drivers )
16
17. Issues for future considerationIssues for future consideration
Ex-post catchment /cluster impact evaluations will be useful to more
fully gauge IW impacts
• GEF EO will undertake an IW Impact Evaluation in 2010.
• Criteria for selection of study:
High levels of GEF funding at the catchment/basin level.
Long-term GEF involvement in the area.
• GEF EO is looking to partner with the Evaluation Offices of
other Agencies.
Looking you’re your input for the planning of the IW impact study
during discussion on Friday
17
18. Tentative Questions for the IW EvaluationTentative Questions for the IW Evaluation
To what extent has the campaigns identified the critical
transboundary concerns and their root causes?
To what extent has the GEF catalyzed agreements among riparian
countries to address the critical tansboundary concerns and their
root causes?
What have been the accomplishments of the campaign so far?
• Better understanding of issues, capacities strengthened, laws and
regulations adopted and enforced, demonstrations, etc.
To what extent do accomplishments signify progress towards
impact?
• Reduction of transboundary environmental stressed
• Improvement on the ecological status and human populations
What are the factors that contribute or hinder progress towards
impacts?
• Lessons and recommendations
18