Stocktaking of Integrated Approach Pilots (IAPs) Preparation
1. Agenda Item 15
Stocktaking of Integrated Approach
Pilots (IAPs) Preparation
IFAD and FAO Learning Event
on GEF
Rome, Italy
December 10-12, 2014
2. Integrated Approach Pilots:
Charting a New Frontier for the Global Environment
Schlosser & Pfirman, Nature Geosciences, 2012
3. GEF-6 Integrated Approach Pilots (IAP)
1. Taking Deforestation out of Commodities Supply Chain
2. Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa
3. Sustainable Cities
Deliver global environmental benefits beyond single GEF focal area
Time-bound nature of concrete impact
Relevance for Sustainable Development
Innovative way to support action at multiple levels based on partnership
4. IAP 1: Taking Deforestation Out of
Commodity Supply Chains
Linking long-term national sustainable development policies and
programs with day-to-day value chain management approaches
Enhance
understanding
among decision
makers
Strengthen enabling
environment
Enhance investment in
sustainable commodities
Support uptake of best
production practice
Market-based approach
Whole value-chain engagement
5. Components of Commodities IAP
Taking
Deforestation
Out of
- Producers
- Services Providers
- Local Communities
Commodity
Supply Chains Enabling
Environment &
Facilitating
Conditions
Increase of
Supply through
means which
do not lead to
deforestation
Increase of
Demand for
Sustainable
Commodities
- National Governments
- Financial Institutions
- Buyers
- Traders
- Processors
7. Programming Process
• February 2014 – preliminary exploratory meeting of interested Agencies
• March 2014 – preparation of Theory of Change
• April 2014 – throughout Assembly the Agencies and GEFSEC met to
discuss potential approaches
• July 2014 – Agencies met agrees ToC and outline structure
• August 2014 – agreed UNDP coordinate program and PFD as well as IFC,
UNDP and WWF leading on components. UNDP appoint Program
Coordinator
• September onwards –Steering Group established, regular fortnightly SG
telephone conference calls + specific work groups
• First set of competent draft documents to be ready January 2015 for
discussion
8. Next Steps
• Stakeholder discussion events are being
programmed in Indonesia, Brazil and China
within the next 5 weeks
• These events will include governmental,
private sector, civil society stakeholders as well
as other active organizations and existing
initiatives and donors.
9. IAP 2: Food Security
OVERALL SCORE
Score 0-100, 100=best environment
Score 72.2 to 89.3
Score 54.5 to 72.1
Score 38.4 to 54.4
Score 24.8 to 38.3
EIU Global Food Security Index - 2014
Potential for Transformational Impact
• Agriculture and Food Security major development priorities
• CAADP pillars on food security, land and water management
• Evergreen Agriculture focus on smallholder farmers and food value chains
Opportunity for integration of Ecosystem Services sustainability and resilience
10. An Integrated Approach
• Multi-stakeholder
platforms
• Institutions and
policies
Engage
Act
• Incentives
• Working at scale -
Scaling-up of
interventions
• Monitoring &
Assessment
Track
Fostering Sustainability and
Resilience for Food Security
Adaptive Management and Learning
11. SAHEL
HORN OF
AFRICA
EAST AFRICAN
HIGHLANDS
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
Geographical Targets
for Food Security IAP
Dryland regions
Smallholder
agriculture
10-12 Countries
13. Program Development Plan
Conceptual
Phase
• Concept
Development
• Consultations
with key
Stakeholders
• Engagement
with GEF
Agencies
• Document for
GEF
Replenishmen
t Meeting
Program
Design Phase
•Characterization
of Target
Geographies
• Country
engagement and
Institutional
frameworks
• Refinement of
Results
framework for the
Program
Operational
Design Phase
• Programming
of resources
• Framework for
Implementation
• Final Program
Document(s)
for GEF
Council
Completed
Completed
14. Criteria for Consideration of Sub-Projects
• Agro-ecological context and spatial coverage - defined landscape
or landscapes within the targeted agro-ecological zones
• Baselines and co-financing - build on existing investments with
potential to catalyze additional resources for transformational
impact
• Institutional framework - evidence of engagement by relevant
ministries and government agencies, development partners,
scientific institutions, civil society organizations, farmer
organizations, and private sector institutions
• Gender consideration - take into account the differences in needs
and practices of women farmers
15. Program Financing
Incentive
$60 M
-- up to $4 M per
country ($48 M max)
-- $12 M for regional /
cross-cutting themes
Matching from STAR
1:1 ratio
-- $48 M min
Co-financing
Baseline initiatives
- Government
- Multilateral
- Bilateral
- Others
16. Next Step - Programming Process
Countries
• Expression of
Interest
GEFSEC
• Review and
consultation
with countries
Lead GEF Agency
• Program
Framework
Document
- Alignment of IAP with country priorities
- Engagement with GEF Agency + partners
- Context and baseline for GEF “incremental” financing
- Amount of GEF resources to be requested:
STAR + Incentive
17. Proposed Organizational Framework
PFD Lead GEF Agency
Sub-Projects
(12 Countries, 1-2 Regional, 1
Coordination)
Project Components
Country A
+ GEF Agency 1
Country B
+ GEF Agency 1
Country C
+ GEF Agency 2
Regional
Cross-cutting
GEF Agency 3
Executing
Partner 1
Executing
Partner 2
Coordination
Lead GEF
Agency
Executing
Partner 3
Note:
1) The Lead GEF Agency is also expected to serve as GEF Agency for sub-projects
based on country choice
2) The Lead GEF Agency will have a separate project for program level coordination,
including monitoring, knowledge management, and reporting
18. Timeline and Milestones
By Dec 2014
Expression of Interests Countries
By end of February 2015
Draft Program Framework Document Lead GEF Agency
By end of March 2015
Final PFD, with endorsement letters Lead GEF Agency
As we all know, despite significant progress in some areas, recent assessments have concluded that we are losing the larger struggle to maintain a healthy global environment. Several studies have concluded that because the global environmental challenges are tightly interdependent, they require more systemic responses. This includes reconnecting environment-related investments previously segregated under discrete silos into more integrated portfolios that can better deal with time-bound problems that are also multifaceted in nature. Therefore, a new and more integrated approach to strengthen GEF’s capacity to respond as a prime financial mechanism to many global accords, and that is also able to tackle urgent issues for the global environment, has become a key feature of the GEF6 replenishment period. The will tackle underlying drivers of environmental degradation and build on existing linkages and connections across the different focal areas, reflecting the needs and growing demand from recipient countries. The IAPs will further complement country programming with transboundary, regional and global scale action,
4 commodities – soy, palm oil, beef, biomass = 80% of tropical deforestation, 12% of GHG emissions
Aim is to provide catalytic support, develop synergy in the fragmented current intervention landscape
Takes a full value chain approach – works with ALL actors along the value chain
Will harness the momentum building to address commodity deforestation – most recently the New York Declaration on Forests
Opportunity to act holistically before irreversible damage done – also help commodities be part of sustainable development pathways for countries
Key elements
Support decision makers
Strengthen enabling environment
Support uptake of sustainable production
Enhance investment in deforestation free commodities
IAP builds on Theory of Change and is designed as programmatic approach with three key components:
Production component
Policy and Enforcement,
Capacity Building of Farmer Support Systems,
Producer Engagement in Targeted Landscapes,
Land Use Plans in Targeted Landscapes,
PPPs Dialogues and National Platforms
Demand component
Enabling/Policy Environment in Demand Markets,
Harnessing the Power of Major Buyers and Traders,
Strengthen the Demand Side of Standards,
Increasing Transparency and Addressing Risk
Transactions component
Engaging Financial Markets and Institutions,
Developing Market Based Incentives for Production and Demand of Sustainable Commodities,
Encouraging Commercial Transactions in Targeted landscapes
4th important component – Coordination
Steering Committee
Sequencing, timing etc of interventions
M&E
Commodities intelligence – what is happening globally: markets, stakeholders, new supply areas
Working with STAP on impacts
Agencies
The IAP is being implemented by a consortium of six Implementing Agencies: CI, IADB, IFC, UNDP, UNEP, WWF
Consortium is necessary due to range of issues to be addressed, supply and demand elements, geographic range
Means there is an unprecedented level of cooperation between Agencies – makes most of each’s comparative advantage
UNDP – COORDINATING the IAP overall – good history of leading complex programs and multi country interventions
UNDP – lead PRODUCTION Component – strengths in land use planning, governance
WWF – lead DEMAND Component – unrivaled capacity in dealing with market mechanisms and market demand
IFC – lead TRANSACTIONS Component – core competence in dealing with private sector clients
BUT – all components are being developed and will be implemented by a partnership of Agencies
Key interventions
Soy/Brazil; Palm oil/Indonesia and key growing markets India and China
Targeted interventions – to address production leakage:
Soy – in Latin America in places such as Paraguay and Bolivia
Palm oil – in West and Central Africa
At the same time the IAP will look for opportunities to bring attention to beef and biomass production which are often ancillary commodities.
Good signs from countries willing to invest STAR in aligned projects
Also in discussion with other interested donors to see if we can extend support, find synergy and complementarity between interventions
Aim to get PFD presented to Council in May 2015
Process was started and has continued within air of collaboration
Has become increasingly clear that success relies heavily on mutual support
Most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are confronted with food insecurity as shown by this latest assessment of the Economist Intelligent Unit. The trend is largely due to the largely subsistence production practices by smallholder farmers, who dominate the sector. Major efforts are underway to transform the sector, with emphasis on inputs to increase yields of food crops. However, the natural capital and ecosystem services are seldom considered, including potential risks and vulnerabilities due to climate change. The IAP is an opportunity for the GEF to engage and integrate options for sustainability and resilience.
The IAP will enable GEF to mobilize and ENGAGE with relevant stakeholders on policies and instructional frameworks, promote innovative practices for securing ecosystem services at SCALE, and ensure effective TRACKING of multiple GEBs. The IAP will will then serve as foundation for GEF to influence and shift the food security narrative toward long-term sustainability so that the negative externalities of agricultural intensification can be avoided.
Agro-ecological context and spatial coverage - defined landscape or landscapes within the targeted agro-ecological zones
Baselines and co-financing - build on existing investments with potential to catalyze additional resources for transformational impact
Institutional framework - evidence of engagement by relevant ministries and government agencies, development partners, scientific institutions, civil society organizations, farmer organizations, and private sector institutions
Gender consideration - take into account the differences in needs and practices of women farmers