Pro Gun Essay

Pro Gun Rights Essay
Everybody knows that gun rights are one of the most debated and controversial topics facing
America today. Guns have been part of the American society since the founding of the United States
in 1776. When the colonies were demanding their freedom from a tyrannical rule. It was written
down that all men who were able to own and carry a gun should exercise that right. They were
needed to defend their homes and the land they loved. Many Americans are still gun proponents to
this day and it has become a growing issue that have people who are adamant about their side of the
argument being the only way to handle the situation. With both sides exploiting situations to make
small gains and create a hostile environment. This does not allow for the issue to be addressed and
fixed. Gun rights should not be infringed upon by the government. A ban would be hard to enforce,
would criminalize otherwise law abiding citizens, and firearms make people feel safe. Most of the
debate about gun rights stems from the second amendment in the Bill of Rights. The second...show
more content...
Guns should be kept out of the hands of criminals who use them for the wrong reasons. This is
where the real issue lies. In 2001, 59% of all homicides in LA and 53% in Chicago were gang
related (Geer). This is an alarming statistic showing that majority of the murders are committed by
gang members and criminals. They are already partaking in criminal activities so a ban on firearms
would not even affect them. They do not carry legal weapons already so a new law enforcing a ban
on at least handguns would not faze them. Criminals would still carry on with their normal activities.
In 2004, among state prison inmates who possessed a gun at the time of offense, less than 2%
obtained their firearm illegally (Alters). There needs to be a better system in place that can keep
guns out of the hands of felons who intend to do harm with a
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Pro Gun Control Debate
As we engulf ourselves in politics for the election year, there has been frequent source of debate
between the candidates; gun control. In the words of Patrick J. Charles of Britannica, gun control is
"...politics, legislation,and enforcement of measures intended to restrict access to, the possession of,
or the use of arms, specifically firearms." Even taking away the political importance, gun control is a
hot topic that is in every Americans mind as fear for personal safety is on the rise. This has been
created by increased media attention and coverage of mass shootings, which seem to occur more
frequently as time goes on. This has lead to the question: can we use laws and enforcement to
reduce the violence? It shows creating laws to control or ban the purchasing and use of firearms is
the most probable to be the solution to reducing gun violence while coinciding with proper firearm
education.
The event that sparked the modern debate of gun control occurred on July 20, 2012 when James
Holmes used weapons with high capacity magazines to open fire on a sold out movie theatre in
Aurora, Colorado, and accumulated 74 casualties, including 12 deaths. Colorado unfortunately is no
stranger...show more content...
Bans of certain classifications of weapons prevent mass carnage from happening easily. Rigorous
background checks ensure no little detail slips through the crack for any individual trying to obtain a
firearm. Along with proper gun education to prevent accidental casualties. There is a way to stop
events such as Sandy Hook from happening, it just requires cooperation from the citizens and the
proper knowledge of how future legislation would work. Although improbable, the United states can
ban together, give up their bigotry and ignorance and create the solution that ensures a safer America
for the

Pro Gun Control Essay
Persuasive Pro Gun Control Essay
Gun control is a vital necessity to the welfare of our nation. Many people out there are supporting the
"anti– gun control cause" with the excuse of "self–defense". I believe that not everyone will handle a
gun for self–defense. The possession of a gun is a sign of power. One of the bigger ambitions that
one has is to have power and the easier it is to obtain a gun; the faster a criminal will gain power
over an innocent person. When one is in possession of a gun, that person has complete control of
their actions and may act upon the weapon however the person may please even if they know that
their action will cause harm to defense–less people. There are many deaths caused by guns out there
that could...show more content...
Teens are not "strong" enough. I always tell my sister that if she is not strong enough to control
herself, she will never be strong enough to control others and will resort to the easiest ways to
"eliminate" that person. She will do whatever is easier to get that stone out of her way rather than
talking things over and controlling the situation.
Not so long ago my neighbor's daughter was killed by her ex. I am positive that this could have
been stopped. I do not know how the man obtained the gun, but I am sure it was through an illegal
way. He is not a policeman, he worked at a supermarket. He does not live in a violent area. He
lived in Bergenfield with his girlfriend. The man did go buy a gun a day before because he knew
that he wanted to kill his girlfriend. The saddest part is that he killed the girl because she wanted
to break up with him. This is what we want for our country? For people to kill their former
boyfriends/girlfriends because that person ended the relationship. This tragedy could have not been
stopped by the girl having a gun with her. In fact, she might have had to face years of prison for
murder and carrying a gun without a license. Sure, gun control will not eliminate violence or
completely prevent criminals from obtaining guns. Criminals have their ways to go around the law
but by having gun control the murders and assaults with gun will lessen. I know that everyone has
rights but the 2nd amendment is misinterpreted.

Pro Gun Control Research Paper
The pro gun control debate is sided by the more liberal organizations. Whether they are
conspicuously discernible organizations for gun control, or even just more liberal news sources, be
sure you ken their political standing afore taking their data as whole truth. Even an organization
such as NPR cannot be held as 100% reliable, because of their generally liberal agendas. The gun
control debate facts for the anti control side are just as suspect. Again, the NRA and its constituents
are perhaps the most vocal in this debate. But generally any Republican or right–wing organization
is going to have some remotely investment in keeping gun control down. Any of their facts and
information are going to be hyperbolized or skewed in order to make gun

Pro Gun Control
The media talks about it. People start protests over it. The newly elected president already has his
plans on its future in the United States. It's the controversial issue on whether or not guns are safe
for the United States. Pro gun control activists believe putting restrictions on guns would benefit the
country tremendously. However, the anti–gun control people do not want the government taking
over their second amendment right. Many believe that gun legislation should be put into place to
prevent crime, while others believe that putting laws on guns interferes with citizens' constitutional
second amendment rights.
Many consider the second amendment still functional in today's society, however, the opposing side
claims the use of guns today...show more content...
The worry many people have nowadays is that guns will end up in the wrong hands. Hands of those
who commit crimes or the mentally ill who cannot handle certain situations well. Another concern
anti–gun activists have is trying to protect society from gun violence. Recently there have been
mass shootings in schools, public events, and even work places. The concern of safety by citizens
is rising after these horrific events happen. It's the reasoning behind why those who speak about
restricting guns have an opinion like that because anything is unpredictable. Likewise, ProConorg
Headlines continues to discuss the restrictions on guns as a necessity. Conservatives will dispute
that opinion and claim guns are essential for self defense. However, it is claimed, "Of the
84,495,500 property crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.12% of victims (103,000)
protected themselves with a threat of use or use of a firearm" ("Gun Control – ProCon.org."). Most
liberals would argue that it is rarely heard of that a gun was used for self defense. They take these
statistics to prove guns aren't often used as a self defense method to those who claim citizens
need guns for safety and protect themselves. It's a very small percentage of the household crimes
that a gun was used in self defense. The other part of the percentage of crimes are the ones who are
committed by people who are looking to do crime. These stats give them evidence in their argument
that we do not need guns in our society because they cause more harm than they do involving us
protecting ourselves. In addition to those who are against guns, they feel as if the intention of the
second amendment was stretched way beyond its meaning. According to the Progressive Cynic, it is
said, "In order to do this, these gun

Gun control is a controversial topic that arises frequently in the United States. This old issue
resurfaces whenever a gun related crime such as a school shooting, terrorist attack, or police
shooting happens. The goal with gun control, which is more commonly pressed by Democrats, is to
make the purchasing of a firearm more difficult to attain. This common problem of gun control is
something that is constantly on citizen's minds and has been for years. It's current legal status is
somewhat tricky to understand as it is different state–wide. While there are some rules and
regulations to follow in order to get a gun, some are not seen as solid ways to control anticipated
buyers. Therefore, there is a high demand to make the regulations of purchasing...show more
content...
Some people argue that when it states "a well regulated militia" that it doesn't pertain to citizens.
Others argue that the clarification of a militia is not stated and well enough to define who can
and can not have the right to bear arms. Ever since the second amendment there has always been
a problem with gun control. People use guns for a plethora of reasons. A Gallup poll showed that
36% of gun owners used their firearms for hunting, 21% used theirs for target shooting and 60%
of gun owners had their firearms for protection against crime. With most gun owners using their
guns as protection it poses a question of why do civilians feel the need to constantly have
protection, or why they don't believe that the police are enough. Current Kansas gun laws do not
require a permit to buy or carry a firearm, however these laws vary state to state. Basic gun laws
require the buyer to be 21 years of age in order to buy a handgun and 18 years of age to buy a long
barreled hunting guns, and each buyer has to be processed into an extensive background check.
Proponents of gun control want to make such laws more strict in order to attain a gun by means of
background checks, while some want to ban the usage of guns

Guns can protect people, their freedom, and their nation! Guns should not be taken away from
innocent and law abiding citizens. Guns have been used to protect and fight for our country, they
have been used to provide food and are a great recreational pass time.
We used Guns to win America's freedom and keep it. Guns are not bad, most of the time guns are
used for self defense. The second Amendment give the citizens of the United states the right to bear
arms. This allows the citizens of the U.S. to be able to protect themselves from corrupt
governments, other countries, and bad people."The NRA states that guns are used for self defence
around 2.5 million times a year". Pro gun control groups believe that gun control will end gun...show
more content...
Most of the time when there is a shooting people say that guns killed the people; This is not true,
people kill people, guns are just the tool used to do it. Guns are just tools they are used by people
they can not act on their own. We already have gun laws in place, like having to be a certain age to
buy a gun and you having to have a special license to own pistols and Automatic guns along with
proper background checks.
Guns can and do protect people, their freedom, and their nation! Guns should not be taken away
from innocent and law abiding citizens. More mass murders and killings of innocent people have
occured because of citizens not being armed then all the anti gun arguments. Some examples of
this would be Germany in 1938 the government rounded up all the guns from 1939 through 1945
in result 13 million civilians were rounded up and killed. They were unable to defend themselves
or their families and property against a government turn evil. Guatemala established gun control
and took the guns away from people and from 1964 through 1981 100,000 people unable to
protect themselves were rounded up and killed. You see this again in Uganda in 1970, cambodia
in 1956, and China in 1935. So all through history you can see how taking guns away from the
civilians have turned bad. Guns keep people safe yes they can be used to hurt or kill someone but
the truth Is most of the time guns save

Gun Control Claim
Some suggest that our nation requires more gun control. I say these claims are absurd! I feel that
it is common sense that a criminal or any individual determined to do harm will not follow this
ridiculous new law. The only results that could come of it is more illegal gun trade and innocent
individuals being stripped of their right to defend themselves as well as other by standers. Doing so
will without a doubt provide non law abiding citizens with the idea that they hold power over the
innocent

Pro-Gun Rights Essay
"Shall Not Be Infringed"
"When Governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is
tyranny." (Beck 35). This quote is from one of the greatest men in the history of the United States of
America, Thomas Jefferson, the father of the Declaration of Independence, and the third President of
the United States. The validity of his statement is not only historical, but as pertinent today as it was
when spoken anew. It is learned in schools across the nation, although the importance of the words
depends on the teacher, school, and region of the country. During the revolutionary period, King
George learned this same concept the hard way, "...an armed populace is a populace that will not be
pushed around."...show more content...
Investigating all ten of the amendments to the Bill of Rights, only the second specifically ensures
that this be expected. The only true power that the people of a nation can have over their government
is the ability to remove it if it becomes more powerful than the people. This is a belief that is
continuously defended or confronted around the world and throughout history. Unfortunately, when
the people have an army standing between them and the government, the means to fight become very
important, albeit difficult. The federal government of the United States, when they attempt to create
laws on gun control, does not have the law on their side. Thanks to the founding fathers of the
United States, this right is ensured through time. They understood that any form of government can
become corrupt and eventually the people will need a legal way to ensure that they can take back
their personal liberties if it becomes necessary.
In the period of time before the United States became the young country it is today, in order to
secure and protect established borders, the colonists were in need of the assistance of the standing
army of King George, the British Red Coats. As soon as the colonists decided to revolt excessive
taxation and other mandates being imposed on towns and states,

The Right to Own a Gun Essay
The Right to Own a Gun
Are you willing to sit back and become a victim of violent crime or allow the government to tamper
with your civil liberties? In recent years, anti–gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the
name of crime prevention this is an assault on the Second Amendment rights of US citizens . The
Second Amendment states, " A well regulated Militia being necessary to the Security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Not only did our Founding
Fathers focus their debate on the right of people to keep and bear arms, they devoted energy to
encouraging future generations to defend theses freedoms. In defense of gun ownership, Alexander
Hamilton said, "If...show more content...
FBI statistics accumulated on a countrywide level show that in states that have strict gun control
laws, there are higher crime rates. If gun control laws have any effect, it may be to increase
crime! For instance, New Jersey adopted what sponsors described as "the most stringent gun law"
in the nation in 1966; two years later the murder rate was up 46 percent and the reported robbery
rate had nearly doubled. In 1968, Hawaii imposed a series of increasingly harsh measures, and its
murder rate, then a low 2.4 per 100,000 per year, tripled to 7.2 by 1977. In opposition, states with
liberal gun carry laws have much lower crime rates. In Florida the homicide rate dropped from 37
percent above the national average to 3 percent below the national average after the state changed its
concealed carry law in 1987. In 1987, Florida's murder rate was 11.4 per 100,000 compared with the
national rate of 8.2. By 1992, the national rate had risen to 9.3 per 100,000 while Florida's had
dropped to 9, and in 1993, it continued to drop another .3 to 8.7 per 100,000. Between 1987 and
1992, rape increased nationally by 14.4 percent. But in Florida, it increased only 2.9 percent and in
1993 rape in Florida decreased .2 percent. Florida issued 204,108 concealed carry licenses during the
first six and half years

Gun Control Research Paper
A shooting here; a shooting there; a consistent day to day event heard in the daily papers and on the
news stations on TV. New media are announcing a shooting someplace. Regardless of whether the
shootings are intentional or unintentional; they are occurring all over the United States. In today's
society, gun control is essential; stricter federal laws must be enacted to save lives. Individual
states' laws are not sufficient to reduce deaths caused by guns In any case, in today's society,
weapon brutality is a sparking debate and controversy on how to control gun violence. Anyone who
thinks that we have enough gun control laws is either NRA, or severely misguided. All across the
nation, a large number of laws and directions have been...show more content...
All guns must be banned. All guns. Get rid of all weapons in homes, and in the city, and, however
much as possible.Not in light of San Bernardino, or whichever mass shooting may fly up next.
Whenever there's a mass shooting in the U.S., members of Congress refuse to bear in mind
discussing gun control, guaranteeing that gun control advocates politicize the issue at a time of
national grieving. "Now isn't the time," they say. It's been a long time since the mass shooting in
Newtown, Conn.; 18 months since the mass shooting in Orlando, Fl.; and over 2 months since Las
Vegas. Would it be a good idea for us to not ask the Republicans in Congress: "Is now the time?
Furthermore, if not now, when? In one more year? An additional five

Pro Gun Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Pro Gun Essay