THE ROLE OF PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS
IN HIGHER EDUCATION TO IMPROVE
THE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE
Dr. C.R. RENE ROBIN M.E., Ph.D
Professor (CSE) & Joint Director
Jerusalem College of Engineering
Chennai 100
PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS
“ The practice of
extracting information
from existing data sets
in order to determine
patterns and predict
future outcomes and
trends.”
OBJECTIVE
To identify the students at risk and take
appropriate decisions to improve their academic
career early in the semester.
 To predict the result of an individual,
department and institution during the semester.
To introduce a new grouping mechanism to
effectively coach the potential students
MOTIVATION
 The in-take of students is in two ways
Management quota
Single window counseling by TNEA
Lateral Entry
 Not necessarily, all students have equal
intelligent quotient.
 Classroom teaching alone is not sufficient
Percentage of students in each group –
Recommendation
GROUP PERCENTAGE
Group I 30% - 40%
Group II 50%
Group III 10% - 20%
Experimental Result
CONCLUSION
• By grouping strategy, better results are fetched
• Better results enhances the ranking of the
institution
• Overcomes personal and academic challenges
through coaching
• Helps the college managements to improve
their academic activities midway through the
course in order to improve their performance.

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS_Linkedin

  • 1.
    THE ROLE OFPREDICTIVE ANALYTICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Dr. C.R. RENE ROBIN M.E., Ph.D Professor (CSE) & Joint Director Jerusalem College of Engineering Chennai 100
  • 2.
    PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS “ Thepractice of extracting information from existing data sets in order to determine patterns and predict future outcomes and trends.”
  • 3.
    OBJECTIVE To identify thestudents at risk and take appropriate decisions to improve their academic career early in the semester.  To predict the result of an individual, department and institution during the semester. To introduce a new grouping mechanism to effectively coach the potential students
  • 4.
    MOTIVATION  The in-takeof students is in two ways Management quota Single window counseling by TNEA Lateral Entry  Not necessarily, all students have equal intelligent quotient.  Classroom teaching alone is not sufficient
  • 5.
    Percentage of studentsin each group – Recommendation GROUP PERCENTAGE Group I 30% - 40% Group II 50% Group III 10% - 20%
  • 6.
  • 7.
    CONCLUSION • By groupingstrategy, better results are fetched • Better results enhances the ranking of the institution • Overcomes personal and academic challenges through coaching • Helps the college managements to improve their academic activities midway through the course in order to improve their performance.