THE CORRELATION BETWEEN 
STUDENTS’ PHONEMIC 
AWARENESS AND THEIR 
READING COMPREHENSION 
BY : AGUNG DIAH WULANDARI 
031110037
I. INTRODUCTION 
A. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 
• In learning English, students do not only learn the four language skills, 
but also some aspects of linguistic knowledge (PhonemicAwareness). 
• Reading comprehension is important to master. It helps students 
comprehend the text. 
B. Reasons for choosing thE topic 
• There are no phonemes in Bahasa Indonesia 
•Reading requires the students to be able to decode symbols
C. THE AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 
1. To investigate students’ phonemic awareness 
2. To investigate students’ reading comprehension 
3. To investigate whether there is a correlation between students’ phonemic 
awareness and their reading comprehension. 
D. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 
Is there a correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and their 
reading comprehension? 
E. HYPOTHESIS 
There is a positive correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and 
their reading comprehension (Ha). 
F. LIMITATION OF THE PROBLEM 
– Phonemic awareness test is limited on words that are consisted in the 
reading comprehension text. 
– Reading comprehension is limited on the students’ ability in answering 
TOEFL text questions.
II. THEORETICAL FOUNDATION 
A. PHONEMES 
“Phonemes are sounds that distinguish words”. 
Murcia et al (2007: 37) 
B. PHONEMIC AWARENESS 
“Phonemic awareness is the ability to hear and 
manipulate the individual sounds within words”. 
Shanahan (2006: 6)
C. READING 
“Reading is the ability to draw meaning from printed 
page and interpret this information appropriately”. 
Grabe and Stoller (2002: 3) 
D. READING COMPREHENSION 
“Reading comprehension is the act of understanding 
and interpreting the information within a text”. 
Shanahan (2006: 28)
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 
A. RESEARCH METHOD AND DESIGN 
• RESEARCH METHOD: Correlation Method 
• RESEARCH DESIGN: Ex Post Facto Design 
Tx Ty 
Tx : Students’ phonemic awareness 
Ty: Students’ reading comprehension
B. POPULATION AND SAMPLE 
C. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT 
D. RESEARCH PROCEDURE 
Giving a test of variable 
x 
Having the data of 
variable x 
Having the data of 
variable y 
Calculating both data using 
Pearson-Product Moment 
formula 
Making a conclusion 
Giving a test of variable 
y
E. DATA ANALYSIS 
1. Scoring the students’ phonemic awareness 
2. Scoring the students’ reading comprehension 
3. Calculating the mean 
4. Calculating the degree of freedom 
5. Calculating the correlation coefficient value
IV. RESEARCH FINDING AND 
DISCUSSION 
Research Finding 
Data Analysis: 
ΣN= 119 
ΣX= 9412 
ΣY= 7760 
ΣX2= 752752 
ΣY2= 518400 
ΣXY= 621540 
Calculating the Mean: 
x= 79.09 
y= 65.21 
Calculating the 
Correlation 
Coefficient: 
rxy= 0.766 
Hypothesis Testing: 
0.05= 0.195 
0.01= 0.256 
rxy (0.766) is higher 
than r-table (0.256)
Discussion 
Interpretation Table 
Value of r Product Moment Interpretation 
0.800-1.00 Very high correlation 
0.600-0.800 High correlation 
0.400-0.600 Quite low correlation 
0.200-0.400 Low correlation 
0.000-0.200 Very low correlation
V. CONCLUSION AND 
SUGGESTION 
• There is a high correlation 
between students’ phonemic 
awareness and their reading 
comprehension. 
Conclusion 
• For the students 
Suggestion • For the next researcher
Ppt sidang (agung diah)

Ppt sidang (agung diah)

  • 1.
    THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ PHONEMIC AWARENESS AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION BY : AGUNG DIAH WULANDARI 031110037
  • 2.
    I. INTRODUCTION A.BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY • In learning English, students do not only learn the four language skills, but also some aspects of linguistic knowledge (PhonemicAwareness). • Reading comprehension is important to master. It helps students comprehend the text. B. Reasons for choosing thE topic • There are no phonemes in Bahasa Indonesia •Reading requires the students to be able to decode symbols
  • 3.
    C. THE AIMSOF THE RESEARCH 1. To investigate students’ phonemic awareness 2. To investigate students’ reading comprehension 3. To investigate whether there is a correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and their reading comprehension. D. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Is there a correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and their reading comprehension? E. HYPOTHESIS There is a positive correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and their reading comprehension (Ha). F. LIMITATION OF THE PROBLEM – Phonemic awareness test is limited on words that are consisted in the reading comprehension text. – Reading comprehension is limited on the students’ ability in answering TOEFL text questions.
  • 4.
    II. THEORETICAL FOUNDATION A. PHONEMES “Phonemes are sounds that distinguish words”. Murcia et al (2007: 37) B. PHONEMIC AWARENESS “Phonemic awareness is the ability to hear and manipulate the individual sounds within words”. Shanahan (2006: 6)
  • 5.
    C. READING “Readingis the ability to draw meaning from printed page and interpret this information appropriately”. Grabe and Stoller (2002: 3) D. READING COMPREHENSION “Reading comprehension is the act of understanding and interpreting the information within a text”. Shanahan (2006: 28)
  • 6.
    III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY A. RESEARCH METHOD AND DESIGN • RESEARCH METHOD: Correlation Method • RESEARCH DESIGN: Ex Post Facto Design Tx Ty Tx : Students’ phonemic awareness Ty: Students’ reading comprehension
  • 7.
    B. POPULATION ANDSAMPLE C. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT D. RESEARCH PROCEDURE Giving a test of variable x Having the data of variable x Having the data of variable y Calculating both data using Pearson-Product Moment formula Making a conclusion Giving a test of variable y
  • 8.
    E. DATA ANALYSIS 1. Scoring the students’ phonemic awareness 2. Scoring the students’ reading comprehension 3. Calculating the mean 4. Calculating the degree of freedom 5. Calculating the correlation coefficient value
  • 9.
    IV. RESEARCH FINDINGAND DISCUSSION Research Finding Data Analysis: ΣN= 119 ΣX= 9412 ΣY= 7760 ΣX2= 752752 ΣY2= 518400 ΣXY= 621540 Calculating the Mean: x= 79.09 y= 65.21 Calculating the Correlation Coefficient: rxy= 0.766 Hypothesis Testing: 0.05= 0.195 0.01= 0.256 rxy (0.766) is higher than r-table (0.256)
  • 10.
    Discussion Interpretation Table Value of r Product Moment Interpretation 0.800-1.00 Very high correlation 0.600-0.800 High correlation 0.400-0.600 Quite low correlation 0.200-0.400 Low correlation 0.000-0.200 Very low correlation
  • 11.
    V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION • There is a high correlation between students’ phonemic awareness and their reading comprehension. Conclusion • For the students Suggestion • For the next researcher