The use of BIM for Facility Management purposes, should not be considered from a mere FM point of view. The real power of such an implementation lies in the ability to predict not only the building cost using BIM, but also the maintenance and operating costs, and even the business operating costs, thus taking control over the biggest numbers of the 1-5-200 rule of thumb, often mentioned when designing (larger) buildings, but seldom shown in the figures when making a first estimate...
Presented on Beyond BIM Symposium - UGent - 09.12.2015
Open Source Strategy in Logistics 2015_Henrik Hankedvz-d-nl-log-conference.pdf
Possibilities of adding FM-specific data into BIM in early Design Phases
1. Possibilities of adding FM-specific data into BIM in early Design Phases
UGent – Beyond BIM – 09.12.2015
ir-arch. Ruben Van de Walle
lecturer CAAD.BIM
coordinator Bachelor Papers
Howest University of Applied Sciences - Bruges
Department of Applied Architecture
2. Possibilities of adding FM-specific data into BIM in early Design Phases
UGent – Beyond BIM – 09.12.2015
• Facility Management with BIM
• Why use BIM for FM?
• Common workflow
• STEP-by-STEP example
• BIM with Facility Management
3. FM with BIM – Overview of Available Solutions
“a BIM model could be gainfully used for FM, since it was able to capture so
much of the building information that could be re-used for its operation and
maintenance rather than have to re-create it”
Lachmi Khemlani – founder AECBytes
AECBytes Feature Article “BIM for Facilities Management” 30.09.2011
4. Using BIM as a database for Facility Management
Two main types of BIM-implementation in FM-suites:
1. Incorporated within a larger AEC-software portfolio (FM adopted by BIM-providers):
• Autodesk: Building OPS
• Graphisoft: ArchiFM
• Bentley: Bentley Facilities
2. FM-Software, providing exchange with BIM
• FM Systems
• Planon
All of them use the as-built BIM (delivered at hand-over) as a starting point for ‘filling up’ the FM-
database.
Bi-directional exchange is (sometimes) possible, but almost always requires a type of
modelling-software to be used to keep the model up to date.
5. Motivation for using BIM in FM
“According to a 2004 report by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), 71 percent of design and engineering documentation
maintained by facility executives is still recorded on paper. […]
A NIST report on inadequate data interoperability estimated the cost at
$15.8 billion in 2002.”
Brandon Lorenz, Senior Editor at facilitiesnet
“The Case For Data Interoperability” - March 2006
6. Common motivations for using BIM as a basis for FM
BIM-data is perceived as more reliable than CAD-derived information
A Virtual Building Model provides a more extensive database than traditional As-Built
There is less data-drop when using BIM for building up FM-inventory
Reliability is determined not (mainly) by the data-type, but by modelling-expertise,
consistency in modelling, defining LOD and (signed) protocols
An extensive unreliable database is less usable than a smaller, but complete set of plans
This is only true when the exchange-format is fully supported on both ends
BIM has the possibility of providing for a better FM-database if FM as a goal is agreed upon
within the BIM-protocol and OpenBIM and IFC/COBie are incorporated in the process
7. Common workflow
“The biggest hurdle, however, is the lack of good data for FM i
n the BIM model.”
Lachmi Khemlani – founder AECBytes
AECBytes Feature Article “BIM for Facilities Management” 30.09.2011
9. Step-by-step example
“Before BIM, if a truck backed into a curtain wall, and you were looking for materials to repair it,
the answer was often bound in files, not searchable, not indexed.
BIM is well-populated, searchable, and easy to query. It is a better source of information about
make, model, and potentially the serial number so that the owner understands what’s in the
building and can make repairs.”
Michael Schley, founder and CEO of FM:Systems
Business Advice Article by Jeff Link on lineshapespace.com
“BIM for Facilities Management: 4 Tips to Improve Lifecycle Performance and Reduce Costs” – 24.08.2015
10. STEP 1: modelling towards a FM-usable BIM
Adding building assets to the
model (e.g. Fire-Extinguishers)
15. Adding FM-approved materials to BIM-libraries
Consistent use of IFC-categories and/or adding (more) FM-specific IFC-categories to standards
Collaborating with FM-specialists in determining which Building Associated Data (BAD) is good
for preparing a BIM to be (more) useful in FM-phase
Ideas for improving the workflow
Creating more useful models for FM (enabling FM-score calculation?)
Standardisation of as-built BIM at hand-over (COBie?) – FM-specific data format? (FM-dot)
Determining what LOD400/500 models should exactly contain and in which format
16. STEP 5: Calculating and optimizing travel distances using model software
Using techniques for
escape routes in
studying travel
distances
17. BIM with FM – Opportunities for Life-Cycle Management
“That is why we – Howest University – as building-owners and the department
of Applied Architecture as BIM-educators, are convinced that all (valid)
BIM-data should be used during the entire life-cycle of a building, and
FM-data should be within reach of any designer.”
Howest AA – Position Statement “Beyond BIM”
“Possibilities of adding Facility Management specific data into BIM in early Design Phases” 09.12.2015
19. Change Management
Managing a building = managing it’s Life-Cycle = managing future refurbishments
Design decisions of the initial building can have an important influence in future building costs.
Lessons learned in FM can help BIM in visualising numerous refurbishing scenarios for
designers and owners, thus enhancing flexibility(=durability) in design
“The most difficult part in adjusting a building’s interior, while
remaining operative during construction phase, lies in the rerouting of
MEP-elements, no longer matching the positions of demolished walls.
Providing wholes at fixed (modular) distances was a simple but
essential design decision in creating a flexible and future-proof hospital
”
Bert Van Boxelaere – senior project architect (osararchitects)
execution phase of AZG Hospital Kortrijk
20. STEP 6: Using parametric modelling and BIM to roll-out design scenarios
21. Cost Management
Total Building Cost = focus on operation and maintenance cost > construction cost
Although the rule-of-thumb 1:5:200 isn’t as valid as often presumed2, integrating operating and
maintenance costs is clearly a logical step in using BIM+FM in Life-Cycle Management.
Integrating Life-Cycle Cost Analysis-data into BIM should help Facility Managers working out
complex scenarios in these matters.
“When managers were asked why they don't use LCCA,
two responses dominated: It's too complicated, and
we're not exactly sure how to calculate it.”
Andrew Gager, principal consultant with Life Cycle Eningeering an editor
at facilitiesnet
“Embracing a Life-Cycle Cost Analysis” - August 2012
2 Will Hughes ea, ‘Exposing the Myth of the 1:5:200 Ratio’, School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading
BIM
Objects
Building
Elements &
Materials
Spaces
Adding IFC-data
Adding LCCA-data
23. Sustainability Management
FM-approved materials = easy and cost-effective maintenance, demolition and re-use
Managing a Building through it’s entire Life-Cycle takes in account it’s refurbishment(s), and
ultimately it’s demolition.
A building is a vast resource-mine. ‘Mining’ will be more effective when a database provides
Facility Managers and Designers with a reliable and detailed inventory of all used materials.
An extensive, all-inclusive definition of digital building materials and their parameters and
properties is necessary to make this possible
“The aims of BAMB (Buildings as Material Banks) are the prevention of construction and demolition waste,
the reduction of virgin resource consumption and the development towards a circular economy through
industrial symbiosis”
Objective of the CORDIS-project by IBGE
“Buildings as Material Banks” 01.09.2015-01.09.2018
24. STEP 8: digital building materials – lack of properties from LCA-Point of View
Available data-fields for
digital building materials
are rather limited