The document discusses several key concepts related to the politics of the internet: 1) It defines the internet in technical, comparative, and social terms and notes variance in network infrastructures in terms of control, ownership, interactivity, and user-created content. 2) It outlines three types of power - capabilities-based, relational, and structural - and provides examples. 3) It raises questions about how the diffusion of information technologies affects the distribution of power and winners and losers, and how power can be regulated.

1. Y490 Politics of the Internet September 6, 2011

2. Three ways of defining the Internet Technical: network of networks Comparative: the Internet as an example of network infrastructure (e.g. railroad, telegraph, telephone, radio, TV, etc.) Social: the people that create communities on the network Source: adapted from Chadwick, pp. 3-4.

3. Variance in Network Infrastructures Degree of centralized control Public vs. private ownership Degree of interactivity One-to-one (telephones), one-to-many (broadcasting), many-to-one, many-to-many (Facebook?) communication Role of user-created content

5. Definitions of Power Capabilities-based power Relational power Structural power

6. Capabilities-based power Examples of types of capabilities Size Wealth Informational advantages Assumption that capabilities can be converted into actual power (over others) If x has more capabilities than y, then x is more powerful than y.

7. Relational power Definition: A has power over B if A can get B to act against his/her preferences but according to A’s preferences. Relational power can be coercive or non-coercive. If A can persuade B to change his/her preferences to be more like A’s, then A has influenced B without using coercion.

8. Structural Power Definition: the ability to control outcomes that derives from the ability to shape the rules of the system. Example: the ability of the health insurance companies to prevent the adoption of healthcare reform that goes against their interests.

9. Questions for Us How does the diffusion of information and communications technologies (ICTs) affect the distribution of power? And vice versa? Who are the winners and losers? Can the losers catch up or be compensated for their losses? How can the winners be prevented from becoming too powerful?

10. Concepts discussed by Chadwick in Chapter 2 Technological determinism vs. Social shaping of technology Decentralization/Disintermediation Participation/Apathy in Politics Community building vs. Online echo chambers Globalization

11. Technological Determinism The view that technologies have an inherent character that cannot be altered or denied and that determine how they will be used and how they affect society Examples of authors who believe this: Jacque Ellul , The Technological Society Tom Friedman , The World is Flat Raymond Kurzweil , The Singularity is Near

12. Social Shaping of Technology Belief that society shapes technology rather than the reverse Sometimes associated with the “Irvine School” (University of California, Irvine) Authors include: Langdon Winner Bruno Latour Steven Woolgar Rob Kling

13. Code is Law Code includes software and hardware (architecture) Determines what people can do with the Internet

14. Four Themes in Code Version 2.0 by Larry Lessig Regulability (cyberspace can be regulated) Regulation by code (code itself becomes the regulator) There are latent ambiguities in free speech rights, intellectual property rights, etc. Competing sovereigns (the law embodied in the Internet’s code competes with the law established by Congress, the bureaucracy, and the courts)

15. John Perry Barlow’s Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace Former lyricist for the Grateful Dead Essay written in response to the passage of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) “ Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.”

16. Anarchy vs. Control Cyberspace libertarian view: Government cannot regulate cyberspace Cyberspace is self-ordered No government can survive without it The state will wither away as a result Lessig: architecture of the Internet is fully compatible with extensive regulation and top-down control

17. Examples of Control: China Big mama monitors Internet cafes and web bulletin boards No anonymity of web sites or email addresses Public expressions of dissent via Internet are strictly controlled Jingling and Chacha -- Internet police in China

18. Disintermediation One possible impact of the Internet is to permit the bypassing of intermediaries, allowing individuals direct access to people and institutions they care about. Examples: Online trading vs. the use of stock brokers Web news vs. the purchase of newspapers Email vs. regular mail

19. Disintermediation and Re-intermediation It is possible that old intermediaries are being replaced by new ones. For example: Newspapers are replaced by blogs Record companies are replaced by iTunes Bookstores are replaced by Amazon and other online book stores

20. Participation and Apathy in Democratic Political Systems Some democratic systems, like the US system, have experienced a decline in political participation and a rise in political apathy Can the diffusion of ICTs change this trend? If so, would that be a good thing?

21. Online Echo Chambers Idea put forward by Cass Sunstein in his book, Republic.com He argues that people tend to seek out views that are compatible with their own and that the Internet allows them to do this more than the early news media (newspapers and TV)

22. Globalization The Internet “builds upon the effects of previously new technologies—mass air transport or television are good examples.” The inherently global nature of the Internet makes it unlike those earlier technologies. Source: Chadwick, p. 27.