Pitch responses - short film.pptx
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•20 views
The document discusses feedback received from a pitch for a short film. The responses indicated that people liked the subject matter and how the film could help others dealing with similar issues. This reassured the pitches that they included relevant information in their pitch and generated interest in the project. While some feedback was unsure, it suggested hitting all requirements and including all needed details for the pitch. Other feedback confirmed the idea fit the brief requirements for the project.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template done .pptx
Jamie Brown created a documentary on fashion for a class project. Their research helped them understand documentary styles and editing techniques. Interviews were conducted but some footage was blurry due to lighting issues. While the green screen and editing worked well, the interviews felt staged. Feedback noted the humorous editing. Going forward, Jamie aims to improve camera skills, time management, and learn more about Premiere Pro editing.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas in presentations and decided to make the documentary more personal. In the end, Jay was very happy with the outcome of his project and felt it demonstrated a distinction level of work. He believed the documentary successfully applied the conventions of the genre and appealed to his target audience.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas in PowerPoint presentations and decided to make the documentary more personal. In the end, Jay was very happy with the outcome of his project and felt it achieved a distinction-level quality. He believed the documentary successfully applied the conventions of the genre and appealed to his target audience. Overall, Jay saw significant improvements in his skills and felt the project was a success.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas through planning and visualizing his documentary. In the end, Jay was happy with the outcome of his project and felt it demonstrated his hard work and improvement. He believed the project was successful and rated it as distinction level work.
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
The document provides guidance for evaluating projects at L3 Creative Media. It outlines sections to include in the evaluation such as project overview, personal response, evaluating the project, and action plan. The evaluator is instructed to use appropriate terminology, stay concise, evaluate statements, and focus on work judgements rather than process. Feedback should help identify strengths, challenges, skills developed, and plans for future improvements.
7. evaluation final
Kieran Bradley conducted research including surveys, questionnaires, and interviews to evaluate their production process for an FMP project. Their planning process tested layout designs and explored color and font options. Peer feedback noted strengths like the central placement of images but suggested adding names and more information. Kieran agreed improvements could include making the logo 3D, adding music indications and event details to be more informative for audiences. They disagreed that the poster lacked professionalism, feeling the modern design fit the target demographic well.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
This evaluation template guides students to evaluate their year two projects at an advanced diploma program in creative media production and technology. It prompts students to concisely analyze their projects, including outlining their goals and themes, research process, development of ideas, collaboration, outcomes, challenges faced, and reception from peers. Students are also asked to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their projects and identify skills and areas for future development.
Eval copy
This document provides an evaluation template for a student to evaluate their year two projects at L3 Creative Media. The template guides the student to outline the aim and activities of their project, discuss their research, idea development, collaboration, feelings about completing the project, challenges faced, what went well and could be improved, how they would rate their final piece, what elements were successful, how they applied conventions of the medium, and targeted their audience. The student is asked to analyze what made the project a success and what elements did not go as well.
Recommended
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template done .pptx
Jamie Brown created a documentary on fashion for a class project. Their research helped them understand documentary styles and editing techniques. Interviews were conducted but some footage was blurry due to lighting issues. While the green screen and editing worked well, the interviews felt staged. Feedback noted the humorous editing. Going forward, Jamie aims to improve camera skills, time management, and learn more about Premiere Pro editing.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas in presentations and decided to make the documentary more personal. In the end, Jay was very happy with the outcome of his project and felt it demonstrated a distinction level of work. He believed the documentary successfully applied the conventions of the genre and appealed to his target audience.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas in PowerPoint presentations and decided to make the documentary more personal. In the end, Jay was very happy with the outcome of his project and felt it achieved a distinction-level quality. He believed the documentary successfully applied the conventions of the genre and appealed to his target audience. Overall, Jay saw significant improvements in his skills and felt the project was a success.
evaluation fmp.pptx
Jay Brown evaluated his final media production project. He was initially attracted to the project due to its focus on bodybuilding, a topic he is passionate about. He undertook research on similar documentaries and his target audience to develop his ideas. Throughout the project, Jay refined his ideas through planning and visualizing his documentary. In the end, Jay was happy with the outcome of his project and felt it demonstrated his hard work and improvement. He believed the project was successful and rated it as distinction level work.
L3 CMPT Y2 Evaluation Template.pptx
The document provides guidance for evaluating projects at L3 Creative Media. It outlines sections to include in the evaluation such as project overview, personal response, evaluating the project, and action plan. The evaluator is instructed to use appropriate terminology, stay concise, evaluate statements, and focus on work judgements rather than process. Feedback should help identify strengths, challenges, skills developed, and plans for future improvements.
7. evaluation final
Kieran Bradley conducted research including surveys, questionnaires, and interviews to evaluate their production process for an FMP project. Their planning process tested layout designs and explored color and font options. Peer feedback noted strengths like the central placement of images but suggested adding names and more information. Kieran agreed improvements could include making the logo 3D, adding music indications and event details to be more informative for audiences. They disagreed that the poster lacked professionalism, feeling the modern design fit the target demographic well.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
This evaluation template guides students to evaluate their year two projects at an advanced diploma program in creative media production and technology. It prompts students to concisely analyze their projects, including outlining their goals and themes, research process, development of ideas, collaboration, outcomes, challenges faced, and reception from peers. Students are also asked to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their projects and identify skills and areas for future development.
Eval copy
This document provides an evaluation template for a student to evaluate their year two projects at L3 Creative Media. The template guides the student to outline the aim and activities of their project, discuss their research, idea development, collaboration, feelings about completing the project, challenges faced, what went well and could be improved, how they would rate their final piece, what elements were successful, how they applied conventions of the medium, and targeted their audience. The student is asked to analyze what made the project a success and what elements did not go as well.
Evaulation question 3
Audience feedback is important for media products to determine what improvements need to be made and to gather diverse opinions on whether the goal of pleasing audiences was achieved. Possible feedback methods include questionnaires, which provide reliable results but limited responses, and focus groups/interviews, which allow comments during viewing but are more difficult to conduct. For a short film, the filmmaker gathered feedback through a focus group to get opinions and advice. Feedback on a film poster was gathered through individual reviews and helped identify that the calendar background was confusing but colors and outlines made the characters stand out. A film review questionnaire provided feedback that the review followed the given brief, language was clear, and the rating system and consistent design with the poster were effective. Gathering
Evaluation
This document provides an evaluation template for a second-year creative media production student to evaluate their projects. The template guides the student through an overview of their project, research conducted, development of ideas, outcomes, personal response, evaluation of successes and challenges, analysis of skills developed, and an action plan for future improvements. It emphasizes focusing on key points, analyzing statements, and making judgements about the work rather than just describing the process.
Audience Researchh.pptxhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The document discusses research the creator is doing to understand their target audience for a short film project. It describes holding a focus group where they will ask questions about preferences for genre, tone, and content. It also describes creating an audience questionnaire to collect statistical data on viewing habits and preferences. The responses to the questionnaire indicate the audience has watched short films before and prefers a stylized crime genre. This gives guidance on including some action alongside dialogue-heavy scenes.
7. evaluation
The document provides an evaluation of a student's FMP (Final Major Project) process. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the student's research, planning, and time management. For the research, surveys provided little useful data while interviews provided some insights. Planning was impacted by changing directions away from initial ideas like a video game. Time management suffered as the student couldn't work from home and faced technical issues. Improving questions, getting more perspectives, and allowing for flexibility in plans and projects are identified as areas for future improvement. The evaluation examines both what went well and where the process could be strengthened for similar future projects.
Evaluation
This evaluation form provides guidance for students to evaluate their projects in a concise and focused manner. It outlines sections for an overview of the project, personal response, evaluation of strengths and weaknesses, analysis, and an action plan. The document emphasizes using appropriate terminology, focusing on key points, and making judgements about the work rather than just describing the process.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
This document provides an evaluation template for a Year Two creative media production project. It guides the student through evaluating various aspects of their football fanzine project, including researching football transfers, developing ideas in Photoshop, challenges faced, skills learned, target audience, and areas for improvement. The student rates their final piece as satisfactory/good, noting strong elements like the Manchester City page design but room for improvement such as varying backgrounds and fonts across pages. They identify skills gained in Photoshop and motivation from their topic.
7. fmp evaluation
This document summarizes the student's final major project (FMP) evaluation. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, technical and aesthetic qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. For research, the student notes strengths and weaknesses of existing images, questionnaires, and interviews. Planning involved mood boards and mind maps. With more time, the student would add more details. Peer feedback praised the variety of styles but suggested more informative text and checking spelling. The student agrees more text is needed to explain picture choices.
Unit 13 powerpoint lo5
The document provides details about the environment, materials, and feedback from a presentation. It describes:
- The environment where the presentation took place, including using a classroom and smartboard for the Prezi, as well as a camera on a tripod to record the presentation.
- The materials used, including PowerPoint uploaded to Prezi for a more visually engaging presentation, and using the internet for research.
- The feedback received, with witness statements highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and surveys gathering feedback to improve future pitches.
Unit 13 powerpoint lo5
The document discusses the environment and materials used for a presentation pitch. It was presented in a classroom using a Prezi on a smartboard. A video was recorded using a DSLR camera on a tripod for high quality. Feedback was received from surveys and teachers to help improve strengths and weaknesses. PowerPoint was used to create presentation content which was then uploaded to Prezi. Research was also done online. Feedback highlighted needing to learn the script and adding more details. Improvements were made such as moving images based on the feedback.
Q3 media a2 evaluation
The document discusses feedback received from an audience questionnaire about documentaries. Key findings include:
- Respondents preferred archive footage and interviews as codes/conventions. This informed including more interviews in the documentary.
- Genre preferences helped decide what genre the documentary would be.
- Asking about gender ensured the survey wasn't gender biased and allowed comparing male and female preferences.
Peer and family feedback on documentary drafts and ancillary tasks helped improve the products by highlighting ineffective areas and changes needed. The most useful feedback came from reviewing the documentary itself.
Fmp evaluation
The document provides a self-evaluation of the author's production process for an animation project. Some key weaknesses identified include a lack of depth in initial secondary research, not researching different styles of animation openings which limited inspiration, and an inability to find specific audience research online. Strengths included gathering useful details from secondary research and conducting interviews that provided rich details. The author notes they could have improved their primary research by conducting more interviews for additional comparisons. Overall, the evaluation identifies areas for improvement while also recognizing positive aspects of the research process.
Evaluation FMP
This document provides a summary of B Herbie Nelson's final evaluation for their music podcast project. The project involved creating a 15-minute podcast interviewing a friend about their favorite songs from different decades. Some key points:
- The project allowed Herbie to pursue a passion for music and turned out well despite challenges with equipment quality and time management.
- Researching other podcasts helped develop the idea and structure. The podcast focused clearly on discussing music through decades.
- While enjoying the creative process, Herbie felt some writing aspects like long PowerPoints became tedious. Audio recordings helped with presentation.
- Overall the project was deemed a success for achieving its goal simply and engaging the target audience of music
Audience research
The document discusses why the author chose the action genre for their film project. They selected action because it is their favorite genre to watch, which will allow them to draw on their own genre knowledge and preferences. This will help ensure the film includes modern, creative ideas that audiences have responded well to in the past. The author also chose action because it will be fun to make and offers many potential story ideas. Their target audience is those aged 15 and over due to the planned strong language and violence. Research was conducted through audience profiles and surveys to learn viewers' preferences and what elements should be included in the film.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
This evaluation form provides guidance for evaluating creative media projects at Level 3. It recommends using appropriate terminology, staying concise and focusing on key points, evaluating statements, and focusing on work judgements rather than process. The document outlines sections for project overview, research, development, outcomes, personal response, evaluation, and analysis. It provides a framework to critically reflect on successes and challenges, and rate the overall quality of the completed project.
7. fmp evaluation
The document provides an evaluation of the FMP project. It summarizes the research conducted, including examining existing products, surveys, and interviews. Planning involved style sheets, layout sheets, and storyboards. Time management was a challenge but the project was completed on time. Photoshop was used to replicate technical qualities of researched products. Peer feedback noted the good use of color but suggested more detail and creative content could be added, especially to the video. The student agrees more work on the video would have improved it.
Evaluation: Question 3.
The student learned about their documentary from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided direct feedback on four questions about whether the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions, the quality of the radio advertisement, and whether the ancillary tasks complemented the documentary. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were professional and the tasks complemented the final piece. However, some felt the radio advertisement did not clearly relate to the documentary. The questionnaires provided similar feedback and showed the documentary successfully used conventions like voiceovers and interviews. The student determined they could improve their ancillary tasks but received positive feedback overall and learned for future projects.
Question 3 - What have you learned through your audience feedback?
The student learned about their documentary's effectiveness from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided first-hand feedback on four open questions about how well the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions and how professional the radio advertisement seemed. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were well-done and professional. However, some ancillary tasks were less successful at complementing the documentary than others. The questionnaires also provided useful data about what worked well, such as the voiceovers and interviews, and areas for improvement like creating a television rather than radio advertisement. Overall, the feedback showed the student was successful at producing a Channel 4-style documentary.
Evaluation: Question 3
The student learned about their documentary's effectiveness from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided first-hand feedback on four open questions about how well the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions and how professional the radio advertisement seemed. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were well-produced and on-brand for Channel 4. The questionnaires also suggested the ancillary tasks complemented the documentary well, though some felt the newspaper advertisement was more effective than the radio advertisement. Overall, the feedback showed the student successfully produced a documentary that fit Channel 4 conventions.
Poster:magazine analysis
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a magazine and poster created by the author's group. For the magazine, the audience liked the graphic of Rose and the font and image choice. They suggested using a closer picture of the girl's face or the boy characters. The audience noticed similarities to professional movie magazines in the font and buzz words. For the poster, the audience enjoyed the dark background and simple look. They suggested potentially enlarging the credits or brightening the background. The audience felt the poster genre was clear and the fonts used were professional.
More Related Content
Similar to Pitch responses - short film.pptx
Evaulation question 3
Audience feedback is important for media products to determine what improvements need to be made and to gather diverse opinions on whether the goal of pleasing audiences was achieved. Possible feedback methods include questionnaires, which provide reliable results but limited responses, and focus groups/interviews, which allow comments during viewing but are more difficult to conduct. For a short film, the filmmaker gathered feedback through a focus group to get opinions and advice. Feedback on a film poster was gathered through individual reviews and helped identify that the calendar background was confusing but colors and outlines made the characters stand out. A film review questionnaire provided feedback that the review followed the given brief, language was clear, and the rating system and consistent design with the poster were effective. Gathering
Evaluation
This document provides an evaluation template for a second-year creative media production student to evaluate their projects. The template guides the student through an overview of their project, research conducted, development of ideas, outcomes, personal response, evaluation of successes and challenges, analysis of skills developed, and an action plan for future improvements. It emphasizes focusing on key points, analyzing statements, and making judgements about the work rather than just describing the process.
Audience Researchh.pptxhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The document discusses research the creator is doing to understand their target audience for a short film project. It describes holding a focus group where they will ask questions about preferences for genre, tone, and content. It also describes creating an audience questionnaire to collect statistical data on viewing habits and preferences. The responses to the questionnaire indicate the audience has watched short films before and prefers a stylized crime genre. This gives guidance on including some action alongside dialogue-heavy scenes.
7. evaluation
The document provides an evaluation of a student's FMP (Final Major Project) process. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the student's research, planning, and time management. For the research, surveys provided little useful data while interviews provided some insights. Planning was impacted by changing directions away from initial ideas like a video game. Time management suffered as the student couldn't work from home and faced technical issues. Improving questions, getting more perspectives, and allowing for flexibility in plans and projects are identified as areas for future improvement. The evaluation examines both what went well and where the process could be strengthened for similar future projects.
Evaluation
This evaluation form provides guidance for students to evaluate their projects in a concise and focused manner. It outlines sections for an overview of the project, personal response, evaluation of strengths and weaknesses, analysis, and an action plan. The document emphasizes using appropriate terminology, focusing on key points, and making judgements about the work rather than just describing the process.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
This document provides an evaluation template for a Year Two creative media production project. It guides the student through evaluating various aspects of their football fanzine project, including researching football transfers, developing ideas in Photoshop, challenges faced, skills learned, target audience, and areas for improvement. The student rates their final piece as satisfactory/good, noting strong elements like the Manchester City page design but room for improvement such as varying backgrounds and fonts across pages. They identify skills gained in Photoshop and motivation from their topic.
7. fmp evaluation
This document summarizes the student's final major project (FMP) evaluation. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, technical and aesthetic qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. For research, the student notes strengths and weaknesses of existing images, questionnaires, and interviews. Planning involved mood boards and mind maps. With more time, the student would add more details. Peer feedback praised the variety of styles but suggested more informative text and checking spelling. The student agrees more text is needed to explain picture choices.
Unit 13 powerpoint lo5
The document provides details about the environment, materials, and feedback from a presentation. It describes:
- The environment where the presentation took place, including using a classroom and smartboard for the Prezi, as well as a camera on a tripod to record the presentation.
- The materials used, including PowerPoint uploaded to Prezi for a more visually engaging presentation, and using the internet for research.
- The feedback received, with witness statements highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and surveys gathering feedback to improve future pitches.
Unit 13 powerpoint lo5
The document discusses the environment and materials used for a presentation pitch. It was presented in a classroom using a Prezi on a smartboard. A video was recorded using a DSLR camera on a tripod for high quality. Feedback was received from surveys and teachers to help improve strengths and weaknesses. PowerPoint was used to create presentation content which was then uploaded to Prezi. Research was also done online. Feedback highlighted needing to learn the script and adding more details. Improvements were made such as moving images based on the feedback.
Q3 media a2 evaluation
The document discusses feedback received from an audience questionnaire about documentaries. Key findings include:
- Respondents preferred archive footage and interviews as codes/conventions. This informed including more interviews in the documentary.
- Genre preferences helped decide what genre the documentary would be.
- Asking about gender ensured the survey wasn't gender biased and allowed comparing male and female preferences.
Peer and family feedback on documentary drafts and ancillary tasks helped improve the products by highlighting ineffective areas and changes needed. The most useful feedback came from reviewing the documentary itself.
Fmp evaluation
The document provides a self-evaluation of the author's production process for an animation project. Some key weaknesses identified include a lack of depth in initial secondary research, not researching different styles of animation openings which limited inspiration, and an inability to find specific audience research online. Strengths included gathering useful details from secondary research and conducting interviews that provided rich details. The author notes they could have improved their primary research by conducting more interviews for additional comparisons. Overall, the evaluation identifies areas for improvement while also recognizing positive aspects of the research process.
Evaluation FMP
This document provides a summary of B Herbie Nelson's final evaluation for their music podcast project. The project involved creating a 15-minute podcast interviewing a friend about their favorite songs from different decades. Some key points:
- The project allowed Herbie to pursue a passion for music and turned out well despite challenges with equipment quality and time management.
- Researching other podcasts helped develop the idea and structure. The podcast focused clearly on discussing music through decades.
- While enjoying the creative process, Herbie felt some writing aspects like long PowerPoints became tedious. Audio recordings helped with presentation.
- Overall the project was deemed a success for achieving its goal simply and engaging the target audience of music
Audience research
The document discusses why the author chose the action genre for their film project. They selected action because it is their favorite genre to watch, which will allow them to draw on their own genre knowledge and preferences. This will help ensure the film includes modern, creative ideas that audiences have responded well to in the past. The author also chose action because it will be fun to make and offers many potential story ideas. Their target audience is those aged 15 and over due to the planned strong language and violence. Research was conducted through audience profiles and surveys to learn viewers' preferences and what elements should be included in the film.
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
This evaluation form provides guidance for evaluating creative media projects at Level 3. It recommends using appropriate terminology, staying concise and focusing on key points, evaluating statements, and focusing on work judgements rather than process. The document outlines sections for project overview, research, development, outcomes, personal response, evaluation, and analysis. It provides a framework to critically reflect on successes and challenges, and rate the overall quality of the completed project.
7. fmp evaluation
The document provides an evaluation of the FMP project. It summarizes the research conducted, including examining existing products, surveys, and interviews. Planning involved style sheets, layout sheets, and storyboards. Time management was a challenge but the project was completed on time. Photoshop was used to replicate technical qualities of researched products. Peer feedback noted the good use of color but suggested more detail and creative content could be added, especially to the video. The student agrees more work on the video would have improved it.
Evaluation: Question 3.
The student learned about their documentary from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided direct feedback on four questions about whether the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions, the quality of the radio advertisement, and whether the ancillary tasks complemented the documentary. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were professional and the tasks complemented the final piece. However, some felt the radio advertisement did not clearly relate to the documentary. The questionnaires provided similar feedback and showed the documentary successfully used conventions like voiceovers and interviews. The student determined they could improve their ancillary tasks but received positive feedback overall and learned for future projects.
Question 3 - What have you learned through your audience feedback?
The student learned about their documentary's effectiveness from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided first-hand feedback on four open questions about how well the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions and how professional the radio advertisement seemed. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were well-done and professional. However, some ancillary tasks were less successful at complementing the documentary than others. The questionnaires also provided useful data about what worked well, such as the voiceovers and interviews, and areas for improvement like creating a television rather than radio advertisement. Overall, the feedback showed the student was successful at producing a Channel 4-style documentary.
Evaluation: Question 3
The student learned about their documentary's effectiveness from focus groups and questionnaires with their target audience. The focus group provided first-hand feedback on four open questions about how well the documentary followed Channel 4 conventions and how professional the radio advertisement seemed. Most participants felt the documentary and radio advertisement were well-produced and on-brand for Channel 4. The questionnaires also suggested the ancillary tasks complemented the documentary well, though some felt the newspaper advertisement was more effective than the radio advertisement. Overall, the feedback showed the student successfully produced a documentary that fit Channel 4 conventions.
Poster:magazine analysis
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a magazine and poster created by the author's group. For the magazine, the audience liked the graphic of Rose and the font and image choice. They suggested using a closer picture of the girl's face or the boy characters. The audience noticed similarities to professional movie magazines in the font and buzz words. For the poster, the audience enjoyed the dark background and simple look. They suggested potentially enlarging the credits or brightening the background. The audience felt the poster genre was clear and the fonts used were professional.
Similar to Pitch responses - short film.pptx (20)
Audience Researchh.pptxhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Audience Researchh.pptxhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Question 3 - What have you learned through your audience feedback?
Question 3 - What have you learned through your audience feedback?
More from MollyBrown86
More from MollyBrown86 (20)
Evaluation (2).docxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Evaluation (2).docxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience feedback of final product after feedback.pptx
Audience feedback of final product after feedback.pptx
Evaluation (1).docxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Evaluation (1).docxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Script Dying on the inside - short film eating disorders.pdf
Script Dying on the inside - short film eating disorders.pdf
Recently uploaded
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart Final Matka Satta Matta Matka 143 Kalyan Chart Satta fix Jodi Kalyan Final ank Matka Boss Satta 143 Matka 420 Golden Matka Final Satta Kalyan Penal Chart Dpboss 143 Guessing Kalyan Night Chart ➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKAARNAUVALERY RECORD STORE SCAVENGER HUNT.
This is my presentation for the Record Store Scavenger Hunt.
Femmely-ACP-how to use social media to drive engagement
Femmely-ACP-how to use social media to drive engagement
一比一原版(BC毕业证)波士顿学院毕业证如何办理
BC毕业证学历书【微信95270640】办理波士顿学院毕业证成绩单（Q微信95270640）毕业证学历认证OFFER专卖国外文凭学历学位证书办理澳洲文凭|澳洲毕业证,澳洲学历认证,澳洲成绩单 澳洲offer,教育部学历认证及使馆认证永久可查 ,国外毕业证|国外学历认证,国外学历文凭证书 BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，BC毕业证，专业为留学生办理毕业证、成绩单、使馆留学回国人员证明、教育部学历学位认证、录取通知书、Offer、
专业为留学生办理波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单【100%存档可查】留学全套申请材料办理。本公司承诺所有毕业证成绩单成品全部按照学校原版工艺对照一比一制作和学校一样的羊皮纸张保证您证书的质量！
如果你回国在学历认证方面有以下难题请联系我们我们将竭诚为你解决认证瓶颈
1所有材料真实但资料不全无法提供完全齐整的原件。【如：成绩单丶毕业证丶回国证明等材料中有遗失的。】
2获得真实的国外最终学历学位但国外本科学历就读经历存在问题或缺陷。【如：国外本科是教育部不承认的或者是联合办学项目教育部没有备案的或者外本科没有正常毕业的。】
3学分转移联合办学等情况复杂不知道怎么整理材料的。时间紧迫自己不清楚递交流程的。
如果你是以上情况之一请联系我们我们将在第一时间内给你免费咨询相关信息。我们将帮助你整理认证所需的各种材料.帮你解决国外学历认证难题。
国外波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询波士顿学院波士顿学院本科学位证成绩单）；
2开始安排制作波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子图；
3波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4波士顿学院毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5波士顿学院成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。疯一把山娃算了算这一次足足花了老爸元够他挣上半个月的山娃很不解一向节俭的父亲啥时变得如此阔绰大方大把大把掏钱时居然连眉头也不皱一下车票早买好了直达卧铺车得经过山娃老家门口山娃拒绝父亲送说往车上一躺就等着下车决无丢失的道理有手机在身联系也方便再说他都岁了还有大半车的小伙伴相伴他不怕在父亲千叮咛万嘱咐中山娃依依不舍地爬上车朝窗外不住地挥手别了父亲别了父亲的城别了我的暑假生活我的城市生活望着窗外挥舞的房
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka哪里办理(sjsu毕业证书)美国圣何塞州立大学毕业证硕士文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sjsu毕业证书)美国圣何塞州立大学毕业证硕士文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Ealing London Independent Photography meeting - June 2024
Photographs from trip to American Deep South
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka GuessingKALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKATanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
Explore the exquisite art of Tanjore Painting, known for its vibrant colors, gold foil work, and traditional themes. Discover its cultural significance today!
PART B. UNIT 1 REPORT.pptx The Artist Mindset in the Elementary Grades
PART B. UNIT 1 REPORT.pptx The Artist Mindset in the Elementary Grades
一比一原版迪肯大学毕业证(DU毕业证书)学历如何办理
多少钱办理【微信号:176555708】【多少钱办理(DU毕业证书)】【微信号:176555708】《成绩单、外壳、offer、真实留信官方学历认证（永久存档/真实可查）》采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路）我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信号:176555708】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信号:176555708】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Colour Theory for Painting - Fine Artist.pdf
This document is all about Colour Theory for Fine Artist / Painter.
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKARecently uploaded (20)
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
Femmely-ACP-how to use social media to drive engagement
Femmely-ACP-how to use social media to drive engagement
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
Ealing London Independent Photography meeting - June 2024
Ealing London Independent Photography meeting - June 2024
Tanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
Tanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
PART B. UNIT 1 REPORT.pptx The Artist Mindset in the Elementary Grades
PART B. UNIT 1 REPORT.pptx The Artist Mindset in the Elementary Grades
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
Pitch responses - short film.pptx
- 2. What do you like about my pitch? • The responses I got from my pitch is helpful as it means I had added in good information about the subject. I am glad people liked the subject and how my short film can help people who deal with the same issues.
- 3. What do you dislike about my pitch? • This is reassuring as it means that I created a pitch that people were interested in, and I added in the relevant information for the subject.
- 4. What could I improve? • Having the answer not sure means that I could have hit all of the requirements for my pitch, and I have included everything that I needed.
- 5. Does my idea fit the brief? • I'm glad that my audience also feel like I have picked a subject and project that fits the brief, as it means that everything I am going to be creating is going to be correct.