Performance - Based
Assessment
Prepared by:
Noguerra, Mark Christian E.
Tokong, Maremar A.
Objectives:
1. To be able to know the Performance-Based Assessment in the
classroom
2. To understand the criteria and benefits of Performance-Based
Assessment
3. To describe the Rubrics in Performance-Based Assessment
Jay Mctighe
serves as Director of the Maryland
Assessment Consortium.
Steven Ferrara
is Maryland’s State Director of
Student Assessment.
Performance-Based Assessments represents a
set of strategies for the application of knowledge,
skills, and work habits through the performance of
tasks that are meaningful and engaging students
(Hibbard et al., 1996, p.5). [5]
Performance-Based Assess
A performance-based assessment
measures students' ability to apply
the skills and knowledge learned
from a unit or units of study.
Typically, the task challenges
students to use their higher-order
thinking skills to create a product or
complete a process (Chun, 2010).[1]
Students are presented with an open-
ended question that may produce
several different correct answers
(Chun, 2010; McTighe, 2015).[1]
We take the position that the primary
purpose of classroom assessment is
to inform teaching and improve
learning, not to sort and select
students or to justify a grade.[2]
Types of Performance-Based
Assessment[5]
Product refers to something produced by students providing
concrete examples of the application of knowledge.
Performance allows the student to show how they can apply
knowledge and skills under the direct observation of the
teacher. It includes oral reports, skits and role-plays,
demonstration, and debates( Mctighe & Ferrara, 1998)
Process-oriented assessments provide insight into student
thinking, reasoning, and motivation( Mctighe & Ferrara, 1998)
Performance-Based Assessment
in the Classroom
Three fundamental principles:[2]
1.Promote learning
2.Use multiple sources of information
3.Provide fair, valid, and reliable information
Assessment can be viewed as an on-going
process instead of single event at the
conclusion of instruction. Rather than waiting
until the end of a unit of study or course to
assess students, effective teachers employs
formative assessments at the beginning of
instruction to determine students’ prior
knowledge.[2]
Principle 1
Promote Learning
Teachin Learnin
When using Performance-Based Assessment,
teachers can make their evaluative criteria
explicit in advance to serve as a focus for both
instruction and evaluation.[2]
Classroom assessments should reflect and promote good
instruction. [2]
● A process approach
it develops drafts, receive feedback and make
revisions
● Experimental approach
it should include Hand-on investigations
They also involves students peer and self-
evaluation using criteria in order to engage
students more actively in improving their
performance.[2]
Principle 2
Use Multiple Sources of Information
A synthesis of information from several sources.
When assessing learning in the classroom may be
illustrated through a photographic analogy.[2]
Assimilation
Photo Album
It reveals a richer and more complete picture of each
student than any single snapshot can provide.[2]
Principle 3
Validity, Reliability and Fairness[2]
Validity has to do with whether an assessment measures
what it was intended to measure.
Reliability refers to the dependability and consistency of
assessment results. A truly reliable evaluation would result
in equivalent ratings by the same rater on different
occasions.
Fairness in the classroom assessment refers to giving all
students as equal chance to show what they know and can
do.
National Capital Language Resource Center(NCLRC,
2011) notes assessment activities must meet the
following criteria:[5]
1.Be built around topics or issues of interest to the
students
2.Replicate real-world communication contexts and
situations
3.Require learners to produce a quality product or
performance
4.Evaluation criteria and standards are known to the
students
5.Involve interaction between assessor(instructor,
peers, self) and person assessed
Benefits of PBAs have been identified
(cf. Blaz, 2001; Tedick, 1998).[5]
1.Performance tasks engage and interest student
2. PBAs are accurate and meaningful indicators not only
about what students know but about what they can do
3.PBAs can increase student confidence because students
know and understand standards
4.PBAs can improve clarity because, by sharing rubric,
students know exactly what is expected to get a certain
grade or score
5. Performance task let teachers know how well they are
teaching and let students know how well they are learning
Authentic Assessment[3]
Also known as the Progressive
assessment. Whereas, the student can
perform different diverse performance
outcomes.
Performance Test[4]
Performance test is a measure which often makes use of
manipulative materials to develop students’ skills and
abilities.
For instance, Students’ task is to Draw their Future
House.
Instructional Objectives is,
“Given one bond paper, pencil, colors, sharpener
and eraser, a grade 2 student will be able to finish drawing
their future house and within 15 10 minutes they are ready
to pass their drawings.
Conclusion
Measuring the skills and knowledge of students in the classroom
can be a cumbersome process. The tactics of using multiple-
choice test or fell-in-the-blank quizzes have not proven to be
accurate indicators of how students might perform in real
situations. Therefore, it is time to focus more on performance-
based assessments that allows the measurement of a student’s
ability to use the language in authentic situations.
The strength of such assessments depends on the rubrics
actually used in the evaluation of the skills. Both holistic and
analytical rubrics have a place in helping to understand skill
levels. Good rubrics will focus on a specific skill or task and
therefore allow for accurate and meaningful measures of
language use.
Finally, the activities designed are also important. New technologies
such as Web 2.0 give teachers access to a variety of useful tools that
make it easier to create authentic tasks, to require the use of higher
order thinking skills, and to go beyond memorizing. These tools also
allow the student to use skills in a variety of ways and situations so that
language is transferred across situations.
As competency and the ability to use a language effectively become
increasingly important, we must develop new ways to improve students’
performances and to make learning more engaging, productive, and
effective. Creating assessments based on performance, advising clear
rubrics, and introducing technology into the classroom have all been
shown to improve motivation and performance. By understanding the
relationship among performance assessments, rubrics, and activities,
we can build classrooms where students can succeed and where what
they learn applies to their needs in the real world, in the classroom, and
beyond.
References
[1].Google.com, Retrieved from:
https://www.edutopia.org/blog/performance-based-assessment-reviewing-
basics-patricia-hilliard December 10, 2016
[2].JayMctighe.com, Retrieved from:
https://jaymctighe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Performance-
Based-Assessment-in- the-classroom.pdf December 10, 2016
[3].Rosita L. Navarro, Ph.D. & Rosita De Guzman-Santos, Ph.D. (2013)
Performance-Based Assessment, Authentic Assessment of Student,2nd
Edition, 36-37, December 12, 2016
[4].Laurentina Paler-Calmorin, Ph.D. Performance-Based Assessment,
Assessment of Student Learning 2, 1st Edition, December 12,2016
[5].Google.com.ph, Retrieved from:
https://mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&idarticle=108
December 12,2016

Performance_Based_Assessment_2_Report.ppt

  • 1.
    Performance - Based Assessment Preparedby: Noguerra, Mark Christian E. Tokong, Maremar A.
  • 3.
    Objectives: 1. To beable to know the Performance-Based Assessment in the classroom 2. To understand the criteria and benefits of Performance-Based Assessment 3. To describe the Rubrics in Performance-Based Assessment
  • 4.
    Jay Mctighe serves asDirector of the Maryland Assessment Consortium. Steven Ferrara is Maryland’s State Director of Student Assessment.
  • 5.
    Performance-Based Assessments representsa set of strategies for the application of knowledge, skills, and work habits through the performance of tasks that are meaningful and engaging students (Hibbard et al., 1996, p.5). [5]
  • 6.
    Performance-Based Assess A performance-basedassessment measures students' ability to apply the skills and knowledge learned from a unit or units of study. Typically, the task challenges students to use their higher-order thinking skills to create a product or complete a process (Chun, 2010).[1]
  • 7.
    Students are presentedwith an open- ended question that may produce several different correct answers (Chun, 2010; McTighe, 2015).[1]
  • 8.
    We take theposition that the primary purpose of classroom assessment is to inform teaching and improve learning, not to sort and select students or to justify a grade.[2]
  • 9.
    Types of Performance-Based Assessment[5] Productrefers to something produced by students providing concrete examples of the application of knowledge. Performance allows the student to show how they can apply knowledge and skills under the direct observation of the teacher. It includes oral reports, skits and role-plays, demonstration, and debates( Mctighe & Ferrara, 1998) Process-oriented assessments provide insight into student thinking, reasoning, and motivation( Mctighe & Ferrara, 1998)
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Three fundamental principles:[2] 1.Promotelearning 2.Use multiple sources of information 3.Provide fair, valid, and reliable information
  • 12.
    Assessment can beviewed as an on-going process instead of single event at the conclusion of instruction. Rather than waiting until the end of a unit of study or course to assess students, effective teachers employs formative assessments at the beginning of instruction to determine students’ prior knowledge.[2] Principle 1 Promote Learning Teachin Learnin
  • 13.
    When using Performance-BasedAssessment, teachers can make their evaluative criteria explicit in advance to serve as a focus for both instruction and evaluation.[2]
  • 14.
    Classroom assessments shouldreflect and promote good instruction. [2] ● A process approach it develops drafts, receive feedback and make revisions ● Experimental approach it should include Hand-on investigations
  • 15.
    They also involvesstudents peer and self- evaluation using criteria in order to engage students more actively in improving their performance.[2]
  • 16.
    Principle 2 Use MultipleSources of Information A synthesis of information from several sources. When assessing learning in the classroom may be illustrated through a photographic analogy.[2] Assimilation
  • 17.
    Photo Album It revealsa richer and more complete picture of each student than any single snapshot can provide.[2]
  • 18.
    Principle 3 Validity, Reliabilityand Fairness[2] Validity has to do with whether an assessment measures what it was intended to measure. Reliability refers to the dependability and consistency of assessment results. A truly reliable evaluation would result in equivalent ratings by the same rater on different occasions. Fairness in the classroom assessment refers to giving all students as equal chance to show what they know and can do.
  • 19.
    National Capital LanguageResource Center(NCLRC, 2011) notes assessment activities must meet the following criteria:[5] 1.Be built around topics or issues of interest to the students 2.Replicate real-world communication contexts and situations 3.Require learners to produce a quality product or performance 4.Evaluation criteria and standards are known to the students 5.Involve interaction between assessor(instructor, peers, self) and person assessed
  • 20.
    Benefits of PBAshave been identified (cf. Blaz, 2001; Tedick, 1998).[5] 1.Performance tasks engage and interest student 2. PBAs are accurate and meaningful indicators not only about what students know but about what they can do 3.PBAs can increase student confidence because students know and understand standards 4.PBAs can improve clarity because, by sharing rubric, students know exactly what is expected to get a certain grade or score 5. Performance task let teachers know how well they are teaching and let students know how well they are learning
  • 21.
    Authentic Assessment[3] Also knownas the Progressive assessment. Whereas, the student can perform different diverse performance outcomes.
  • 22.
    Performance Test[4] Performance testis a measure which often makes use of manipulative materials to develop students’ skills and abilities. For instance, Students’ task is to Draw their Future House. Instructional Objectives is, “Given one bond paper, pencil, colors, sharpener and eraser, a grade 2 student will be able to finish drawing their future house and within 15 10 minutes they are ready to pass their drawings.
  • 23.
    Conclusion Measuring the skillsand knowledge of students in the classroom can be a cumbersome process. The tactics of using multiple- choice test or fell-in-the-blank quizzes have not proven to be accurate indicators of how students might perform in real situations. Therefore, it is time to focus more on performance- based assessments that allows the measurement of a student’s ability to use the language in authentic situations. The strength of such assessments depends on the rubrics actually used in the evaluation of the skills. Both holistic and analytical rubrics have a place in helping to understand skill levels. Good rubrics will focus on a specific skill or task and therefore allow for accurate and meaningful measures of language use.
  • 24.
    Finally, the activitiesdesigned are also important. New technologies such as Web 2.0 give teachers access to a variety of useful tools that make it easier to create authentic tasks, to require the use of higher order thinking skills, and to go beyond memorizing. These tools also allow the student to use skills in a variety of ways and situations so that language is transferred across situations. As competency and the ability to use a language effectively become increasingly important, we must develop new ways to improve students’ performances and to make learning more engaging, productive, and effective. Creating assessments based on performance, advising clear rubrics, and introducing technology into the classroom have all been shown to improve motivation and performance. By understanding the relationship among performance assessments, rubrics, and activities, we can build classrooms where students can succeed and where what they learn applies to their needs in the real world, in the classroom, and beyond.
  • 25.
    References [1].Google.com, Retrieved from: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/performance-based-assessment-reviewing- basics-patricia-hilliardDecember 10, 2016 [2].JayMctighe.com, Retrieved from: https://jaymctighe.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Performance- Based-Assessment-in- the-classroom.pdf December 10, 2016 [3].Rosita L. Navarro, Ph.D. & Rosita De Guzman-Santos, Ph.D. (2013) Performance-Based Assessment, Authentic Assessment of Student,2nd Edition, 36-37, December 12, 2016 [4].Laurentina Paler-Calmorin, Ph.D. Performance-Based Assessment, Assessment of Student Learning 2, 1st Edition, December 12,2016 [5].Google.com.ph, Retrieved from: https://mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&idarticle=108 December 12,2016