1) The document discusses Jeremy's lack of motivation and low self-esteem from multiple perspectives - teachers, peers, parents, and self. It analyzes each using various psychological theories. 2) Teachers are seen as contributing to Jeremy's poor self-perception through harsh comments. Peers reject and ridicule Jeremy. His authoritarian parents demand good results without emotional support. 3) Proposed solutions include teachers being more encouraging, establishing peer cooperation, counseling parents on parenting styles, and giving Jeremy social and study skills training to improve his self-concept.

1. QED528: Educational PsychologyPBL PresentationScenario 2Group Members:HoSi HuiPragalath S/O SadasivamRenukaSelvaRajooShirinBinteShaikMuhyideenTing Zheng Xi Jason

2. Problem statements/issues1) Lack of intrinsic motivation2) Low self-esteem 3)Lack of social development

3. Diagnostic Tools

4. Parents

5. School

6. Problem area 1: Teachers

7. Theories to explain for Jeremy's lack of self-esteem:Attribution Theory (Weiner, 1979)Concept of "attribution"The attributions are more related to one’s (past) experiences Theory suggests that people attribute success/failure to 4 factors: ability & effort (dispositional) luck & difficulty (situational)Cause of failure:Jeremy’s teachers: attributed his failure to his lack of effort(internal).Jeremy himself: attributed his failure to his ability (external).http://faculty.weber.edu/pstewart/6030/6030.html

8. AT applied to JEREMY’s case Mr Tan: So, you are the odd one out againhuh, Jeremy.

9. Ms Low: What is wrong with you? The rest of the class don't give me any problems. You are the only one!I get complaints from every subject teacher that you don't pay attention in class! Why can't you be like the others? Teachers as contributing component: through harsh/insensitive comments, reinforces his poor self-perception over time“It's me. Me only. I am a problem. I am the only one with problems.”Jeremyhttp://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/t/thought_bubble_gifts.asp

10. AT applied to JEREMY’s caseJeremy's poor academic performance also perpetuates his low self-esteem & perceptions of his own academic ability Idea of "stability" (Weiner et al., 1983) Failure ascribed to a stable cause like low ability will lead to decreased motivation (Tan et al., 2011p.336)"Pygmalion Effect" (Rosenthal and Jacobson, 1968)"I already tried so hard but I still cannot perform. Maybe I really just can't do it."

11. Problem Area 2: Peers

12. Importance of PeersErikson's Psychosocial Development (Tan, et al 2010)Identity VS Role Confusion (Adolescence, 12 to 18 years)Point of Reference: Peer (conformity & social acceptance)Cohesive sense of self in social groups

13. Children who are rejected by their peers, who experience more loneliness and social isolation, are more likely to become disaffected from academic activities and eventually leave school. (Sage& Kindermann, 1999). Importance of Peers

14. Importance of Peers“Peers are the most potent influence on their [students’] day-to-day behaviors in school (e.g., how much time they spend on homework, if they enjoy coming to school each day, how they behave in the classroom)” (Steinberg, Dornbusch, and Brown 1992, p.727)

15. Importance of PeersAdolescents who reported higher felt security with their peers also showed higher identity integration and general self-esteem. (Ryan et al, 1994)

16. Jeremy:Rejected Peer Status

17. Jeremy: A Rejected PeerJeremy ostracized in class because he is different (e.g. rich) and does not participate in class events.Relational aggressive behaviour: Teasing, ridiculing, ignoring Jeremy

18. Maslow Hierarchy of NeedsBelonging NeedsJeremy wished he could leave the class immediately. He has never felt that he belonged here. Then again, he has never felt that he belonged anywhere. He is so used to being alone. During recess time, he would always sit and eat alone.

19. Jeremy: A Rejected PeerClassmates ridicule Jeremy when he makes mistakes

20. Maslow Hierarchy of NeedsEsteem NeedsSelf-esteemEsteem Jeremy gets from his peersFeels inferior, weak, helpless and worthless

21. Jeremy: A Rejected PeerInadequate social skills: inability to interact and get along with others

22. Jeremy: A Rejected PeerLoneliness: Sharing his problems with Dino, his toy dinosaurWithdrawn: Refuses to participate in group discussion despite Misha’s continued attemptsReactive aggressive Behaviour: against teacher, after she embarrassed him in front of the whole class.

23. Problem Area 3: ParentsThe Impact of Parenting Styles on Student Motivation and Self Esteem

24. Parenting StylesMotivationSelf-EsteemJeremy’s Case

25. Parenting StylesBaumrind’s Theory : AuthoritarianAuthoritative Permissive

26. Impact of Parenting Style on Student motivationParental Involvement: “the extent to which a parent is dedicated to, takes an interest in, is knowledgeable about, and is actively participating in the child’s life” (Hoang, 2007: 3)Greatly impacts a child’s school experience (Coleman and McNeese, 2009).Affects the academic achievement of children (Pomerantz et al, 2007).

27. Impact of Parenting Style on Student motivationAuthoritarian parents  Children are more extrinsically motivated.Permissive parents  Children are less motivated and independent.Authoritative parents  Children are more intrinsically motivate, as they feel that they have greater control over their education (Hoang, 2007)

28. Impact of Parenting Styles on Student’s Self-EsteemParental involvement affects the academic achivement of their children. Parenting styles influence the self-esteem of students.(Smith, 2006)Authoritative parents  Higher self-esteemAuthoritarian parents  Lower Self EsteemPermissive Parents  Lower Self Esteem

29. Jeremy’s CaseParenting Style: AuthoritarianDemanding – Jeremy has to produce good academic results. Excessive control over Jeremy’s lifeNot emotionally responsive

30. Jeremy’s CaseAuthoritarian ParentsLack of MotivationLow Self-Esteem

31. Problem Area 4: SelfThe Impact of Self on Student Motivation and Self Esteem

32. Identity Diffusion: Marcia’s Identity Status TheoryLow self esteemWilling to accept an identity given to him by othersforming an identity of himself as an outcast and a good-for-nothingSelf-fulfilling prophecy influenced by teachers, peers and parents

33. Identity Diffusion: Marcia’s Identity Status TheoryLack of ideological and vocational direction reflects apathy and a lack of concern about directing his present and future life passive and affective: remains quiet and unresponsive despite the taunts of his friendsReclusive: chooses not to interact with his friends or any human beings in general but his soft toy instead

34. Identity Diffusion: Marcia’s Identity Status TheoryCognitive PerformanceNo differences in intelligence across identity statusesExhibits withdrawal in the face of challengesImpulsive behaviour which could translate into poor academic achievement

35. Erikson’s Psychosocial Development TheoryIndustry and Inferiority/ Identity and Role ConfusionJeremy’s psychosocial development has been adversely affected by stages of his lifethere may be problems/failures in his childhood during the age of 7 to 11 that has caused him to feel inferiorThis may subsequently result in his lack of self-esteem and self-worth

36. Robins and Trzesniewski(2005)

37. Proposed Solutions

38. Solutions - TeachersTeachers can try to be more understanding of Jeremy's situation (introvert, low self-esteem), + Be more sensitive (more cautious when making comments and remarks), + Be more encouraging (good guess, Jeremy but this may not be the best answer. do you want to give it another try?) recognize his efforts at trying.

39. Solutions - PeersTeacher to talk to Jeremy’s classmates Opportunities for cooperative learning: assign groupsEstablish rules governing acceptable classroom behaviour

40. Solutions - ParentsCounselling for the parentsSuggest ways in which they can adopt a more authoritative parenting style, instead of an authoritarian one.Give Jeremy greater autonomy and independence  Boost his self-esteemLower their expectations of his academic performance

41. Solutions - ParentsReduce his tuition and give him more time to spend on non-academic activitiesParents have to spend more time with Jeremy.Parents should have more positive beliefs about Jeremy’s potential.

42. Solutions - SelfGive Jeremy counseling on the followingHow to socialize with other peopleStudying strategies

43. END

44. ReferencesAbrams, K., Theberge S.K. and Orv C.K. (2005), Children and Adolescents Who Are Depressed: An Ecological Approach. Professional School Counseling (8)3, pp. 284-92.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood (1974). Child Development, 45, pp. 1-5.Bronfenbrenner, U.‎ (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Coleman, B., McNeese, M.N. (2009) From home to school: The relationship among parental involvement, student motivation, and academic motivation, International Journal of Learning, 16 (7), pp. 459-470.Cote, J.E. and Schwartz, S.J. (2002) Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 25, pp. 571–586.

45. ReferencesDede P. & John R. (2001). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory Retrieved from: pt3.nl.edu/paquetteryanwebquest.pdf [Assessed on 20 September 2011]Hoang, T.N. (2007) The relations between parents and adolescent motivation, International Journal of Whole Schooling, 3 (2), pp. 1-21.Huitt, W. (2007). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/regsys/maslow.html[Assessed on 20 September 2011]Karkkainen, R., Raty, H. and Kasanen, K. (2011). 'Parents' Perceptions of the Malleability of their child's Academic Competencies', Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol.55(3), pp.213-224. Marcia, J.E. (1980) Identity in Adolescence. In: Adelson, J. (ed.) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, New York: Wiley and Sons, pp. 159-187.

46. References Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. McArthur, J. (2011). '"What Happened?" Teaching Attribution Theory through Ambiguous Prompts', Communication Teacher, Vol.25(1), pp.32-36. McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., & Mercer, L. (2001). The consequences of childhood rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection. (pp. 213-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Pomerantz, E.M., Moorman, E.A. & Litwack, S.D. (2007) The How, Whom and Why of Parental Involvement in Children’s Academic Lives, Review of Educational Research, 77 (3), pp. 373-410.Robins, R.W. and Trzesniewski, K.H. (2005) Self-esteem development across the lifespan. Current Directions in Psychological Science,14(3), pp. 158-162.

47. References Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, pp. 226 –249.Sage, N. A., & Kindermann, T. A. (1999). Peer networks, behavior contingencies, and children’s engagement in the classroom. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, pp. 143–171. Smith, G.J. (2006) Parenting effects on self efficacy and self-esteem in Late Adolescence and how those factors impact adjustment into college. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association (78th, Philadelphia, PA, March 23-25, 2007.Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement. American Psychologist, 47, pp. 723–729. Tan, O.S., Parsons, R.D., Hinson, S.L. and Sardo-Brown, D. (2011). Educational Psychology: A Practitioner-Researcher Approach An Asian Edition (2nd Ed). Singapore: Thomson, pp.333-339.