For novice, please continue from "Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS" (http://www.slideshare.net/rahulleslie/modelling-building-frame-with-staadpro-etabs-rahul-leslie).
This is a presentation covering almost all aspects of Seismic analysis & design of Multi-storied RC Structures using the Indian code IS:1893-2016 (New edition), with references to IS:13920-2015 (Code for ductile detailing) & IS:16700-2017 (code for design of tall buildings) where relevant; following for each aspect of the code, (1) The clause/formula (2) It's explanation/theory (3) How it is/can be implemented in the software packages of (i) STAAD.Pro and (ii) ETABS
This is the latest edition of the earlier slides based on IS:1893-2002 which this one supersedes. This is Part-I of a two part series.
Part-II: Seismic Analysis/Design of Multi-storied RC Buildings using STAAD.Pr...Rahul Leslie
For novice, please continue from "Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS" (http://www.slideshare.net/rahulleslie/modelling-building-frame-with-staadpro-etabs-rahul-leslie).
This is a presentation covering almost all aspects of Seismic analysis & design of Multi-storied RC Structures using the Indian code IS:1893-2016 (New edition), with references to IS:13920-2015 (Code for ductile detailing) & IS:16700-2017 (code for design of tall buildings) where relevant; following for each aspect of the code, (1) The clause/formula (2) It's explanation/theory (3) How it is/can be implemented in the software packages of (i) STAAD.Pro and (ii) ETABS
This is the latest edition of the earlier slides based on IS:1893-2002 which this one supersedes. This is Part-II of a two part series.
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
Part-II: Seismic Analysis/Design of Multi-storied RC Buildings using STAAD.Pr...Rahul Leslie
For novice, please continue from "Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS" (http://www.slideshare.net/rahulleslie/modelling-building-frame-with-staadpro-etabs-rahul-leslie).
This is a presentation covering almost all aspects of Seismic analysis & design of Multi-storied RC Structures using the Indian code IS:1893-2016 (New edition), with references to IS:13920-2015 (Code for ductile detailing) & IS:16700-2017 (code for design of tall buildings) where relevant; following for each aspect of the code, (1) The clause/formula (2) It's explanation/theory (3) How it is/can be implemented in the software packages of (i) STAAD.Pro and (ii) ETABS
This is the latest edition of the earlier slides based on IS:1893-2002 which this one supersedes. This is Part-II of a two part series.
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from ETABS with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2. The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2.
The aim of this manual is to give the design application of the basic requirements of EC8 for new concrete and steel buildings using ETABS. This book can be used by users of ETABS modeler. Is not cover all the steps that you have to carry during designing model using ETABS but is a good manual for those who using Eurocodes.
This publication provides a concise compilation of selected rules in the Eurocode 8, together with relevant Cyprus National Annex, that relate to the design of common forms of concrete building structure in the South Europe. It id offers a detail view of the design of steel framed buildings to the structural Eurocodes and includes a set of worked examples showing the design of structural elements with using software (CSI ETABS). It is intended to be of particular to the people who want to become acquainted with design to the Eurocodes. Rules from EN 1998-1-1 for global analysis, type of analysis and verification checks are presented. Detail design rules for steel composite beam, steel column, steel bracing and composite slab with steel sheeting from EN 1998-1-1, EN1993-1-1 and EN1994-1-1 are presented. This guide covers the design of orthodox members in steel frames. It does not cover design rules for regularities. Certain practical limitations are given to the scope.
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from ETABS with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2. The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2.
The aim of this manual is to give the design application of the basic requirements of EC8 for new concrete and steel buildings using ETABS. This book can be used by users of ETABS modeler. Is not cover all the steps that you have to carry during designing model using ETABS but is a good manual for those who using Eurocodes.
This publication provides a concise compilation of selected rules in the Eurocode 8, together with relevant Cyprus National Annex, that relate to the design of common forms of concrete building structure in the South Europe. It id offers a detail view of the design of steel framed buildings to the structural Eurocodes and includes a set of worked examples showing the design of structural elements with using software (CSI ETABS). It is intended to be of particular to the people who want to become acquainted with design to the Eurocodes. Rules from EN 1998-1-1 for global analysis, type of analysis and verification checks are presented. Detail design rules for steel composite beam, steel column, steel bracing and composite slab with steel sheeting from EN 1998-1-1, EN1993-1-1 and EN1994-1-1 are presented. This guide covers the design of orthodox members in steel frames. It does not cover design rules for regularities. Certain practical limitations are given to the scope.
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul LeslieRahul Leslie
A basic tutorial to learn the concepts of modelling RC building in an Analysis/Design package -- STAAD.Pro & ETABS are in focus here, but concepts are applicable for any package. Good for novice in structural designing, and also B.Tech / BE / BSc (Engg) / BS students wising to do 'design of multi-storied RC building' as their final year project.
The Pushover Analysis from basics - Rahul LeslieRahul Leslie
Pushover analysis has been in the academic-research arena for quite long. The papers published in this field usually deals mostly with proposed improvements to the approach, expecting the reader to know the basics of the topic... while the common structural design practitioner, not knowing the basics, is left out from participating in those discussions. Here I’m making an effort to bridge that gap by explaining the Pushover analysis, from basics, in its simplicity.
A write up on this topic can be found at http://rahulleslie.blogspot.in/p/blog-page.html, though does not cover the full spectrum presented in this slide show.
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Buying new cosmetic products is difficult. It can even be scary for those who have sensitive skin and are prone to skin trouble. The information needed to alleviate this problem is on the back of each product, but it's thought to interpret those ingredient lists unless you have a background in chemistry.
Instead of buying and hoping for the best, we can use data science to help us predict which products may be good fits for us. It includes various function programs to do the above mentioned tasks.
Data file handling has been effectively used in the program.
The automated cosmetic shop management system should deal with the automation of general workflow and administration process of the shop. The main processes of the system focus on customer's request where the system is able to search the most appropriate products and deliver it to the customers. It should help the employees to quickly identify the list of cosmetic product that have reached the minimum quantity and also keep a track of expired date for each cosmetic product. It should help the employees to find the rack number in which the product is placed.It is also Faster and more efficient way.
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacksgerogepatton
This paper addresses the vulnerability of deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks
(CNN)s, to adversarial attacks and presents a proactive training technique designed to counter them. We
introduce a novel volumization algorithm, which transforms 2D images into 3D volumetric representations.
When combined with 3D convolution and deep curriculum learning optimization (CLO), itsignificantly improves
the immunity of models against localized universal attacks by up to 40%. We evaluate our proposed approach
using contemporary CNN architectures and the modified Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR-10
and CIFAR-100) and ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC12) datasets, showcasing
accuracy improvements over previous techniques. The results indicate that the combination of the volumetric
input and curriculum learning holds significant promise for mitigating adversarial attacks without necessitating
adversary training.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER IN CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGERS...ssuser7dcef0
Power plants release a large amount of water vapor into the
atmosphere through the stack. The flue gas can be a potential
source for obtaining much needed cooling water for a power
plant. If a power plant could recover and reuse a portion of this
moisture, it could reduce its total cooling water intake
requirement. One of the most practical way to recover water
from flue gas is to use a condensing heat exchanger. The power
plant could also recover latent heat due to condensation as well
as sensible heat due to lowering the flue gas exit temperature.
Additionally, harmful acids released from the stack can be
reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation. reduced in a condensing heat exchanger by acid condensation.
Condensation of vapors in flue gas is a complicated
phenomenon since heat and mass transfer of water vapor and
various acids simultaneously occur in the presence of noncondensable
gases such as nitrogen and oxygen. Design of a
condenser depends on the knowledge and understanding of the
heat and mass transfer processes. A computer program for
numerical simulations of water (H2O) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4)
condensation in a flue gas condensing heat exchanger was
developed using MATLAB. Governing equations based on
mass and energy balances for the system were derived to
predict variables such as flue gas exit temperature, cooling
water outlet temperature, mole fraction and condensation rates
of water and sulfuric acid vapors. The equations were solved
using an iterative solution technique with calculations of heat
and mass transfer coefficients and physical properties.
Saudi Arabia stands as a titan in the global energy landscape, renowned for its abundant oil and gas resources. It's the largest exporter of petroleum and holds some of the world's most significant reserves. Let's delve into the top 10 oil and gas projects shaping Saudi Arabia's energy future in 2024.
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)ClaraZara1
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024) will provide an excellent international forum for sharing knowledge and results in theory, methodology and applications of on Machine Learning & Applications.
HEAP SORT ILLUSTRATED WITH HEAPIFY, BUILD HEAP FOR DYNAMIC ARRAYS.
Heap sort is a comparison-based sorting technique based on Binary Heap data structure. It is similar to the selection sort where we first find the minimum element and place the minimum element at the beginning. Repeat the same process for the remaining elements.
We have compiled the most important slides from each speaker's presentation. This year’s compilation, available for free, captures the key insights and contributions shared during the DfMAy 2024 conference.
RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Hori...
Part-I: Seismic Analysis/Design of Multi-storied RC Buildings using STAAD.Pro & ETABS according to IS:1893-2016 - Rahul Leslie 181118
1. 1
Seismic Analysis/Design of
Multi-storied RC Buildings
using STAAD.Pro & ETABS
according to IS:1893-2016
Presented by .
Rahul Leslie
Deputy Director,
Buildings Design,
DRIQ, Kerala PWD
Trivandrum, India
Part - I
2. 2
Topics Covered:
• Computer modelling and analysis using
STAAD.Pro & ETABS for
– Seismic Coefficient method as per IS:1893
(Part 1)-2016*
– Response Spectrum method as per
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016* (Covered in Part-II)
• Miscellaneous points
* With references to IS:13920-2015 & IS:16700-2017 where
relevant
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
3. 3
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Aspects of Computer Model:
• Modelling is done using analysis packages like
STAAD.Pro, STRAP, NISA Des. Studio, ETABS,
GT STRUDL, RISA-3D, MIDAS-Gen, etc.
4. 4
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Aspects of Computer Model:
• Modelling is done using analysis packages like
STAAD.Pro, STRAP, NISA Des. Studio, ETABS,
GT STRUDL, RISA-3D, MIDAS-Gen, etc.
• Model contains
• Beams
• Columns
• Shear walls
But not usually
• Slabs, except
• Flat slabs / Flat plates
• Sloped RC Roofs (in ETABS)
• Masonry wall infills
• Stair slabs
Foundation is represented by support points only
13. 13
Aspects of Computer Model (Cont…)
• A model must ideally represent the complete three
dimensional (3D) characteristics of the building, including
– geometry
– stiffness of various members
– supports
– load distribution
– mass distribution
• For models in the purview of IS:16700-2017*, rigid offsets
at beam-column joint region should also be considered. (7.2
(a), IS:16700-2017)
* Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings, applicable to RC
buildings in the range of 50 to 250m height
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
14. 14
Beams and columns
• Beams and columns are modelled by frame elements
• Plinth beams should also be modelled as beams
• Slabs are not usually modelled
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
15. 15
Beams and columns
• Stiffness of Beams and columns to be reduced as:
• Beams: Ieff = 0.35 Igross
• Columns : Ieff = 0.7 Igross
(6.4.3.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) – New
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
16. 16
Beams and columns
• Stiffness of Beams and columns to be reduced as:
• Beams: Ieff = 0.35 Igross
• Columns : Ieff = 0.7 Igross
(6.4.3.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) – New
• However, nothing has been mentioned on stiffness
reduced factors for
• Shear walls
• Flat slabs / Slabs
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
17. 17
Beams and columns
• Alternatively, in IS:16700-2017*, the reduction factors are
given as :
a) For factored load cases –
• Slabs: Ieff = 0.25 Igross
• Beams : Ieff = 0.35 Igross
• Columns : Ieff = 0.7 Igross
• Walls : Ieff = 0.7 Igross
b) For un-factored load cases –
• Slabs: Ieff = 0.35 Igross
• Beams : Ieff = 0.7 Igross
• Columns : Ieff = 0.9 Igross
• Walls : Ieff = 0.9 Igross
(7.2 & Table 6, IS:16700-2017)
*(for buildings coming under its purview)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
18. 18
Beams and columns
• Using two sets of stiffness reduction factors (SRF),
however, has its own issues:
It will require analysis using two copies of the same Finite
Element model files,
One with SRF for factored loads, and
The other with SRF for un-factored loads
...unless the Analysis software packages in future come
up with facilities for optioning different SRF for different
load combination cases – (load combinations to be
covered later)
In Response Spectrum method (to be covered later), the
models for factored and un-factored loads end up having
different (but very close) sets of mode shapes and mode
frequencies, thus having each model analysed with
different sets of modal parameters, though for the same
building – I presume it is okay and generally accepted
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
19. 19
Assign section modifiers …
ETABS: For Beams
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
20. 20
Assign section modifiers …
ETABS: For Columns
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
23. 23
Supports:
• The type of support to be provided is decided by
considering the degree of fixity provided by the
foundation.
• Fixed Supports:
– Raft foundation: Support to be provided at the column
ends (located at top of the raft)
– Pile cap for multiple piles: Support to be provided at the
column ends (located at top of the pile cap)
– Isolated footing: When it is founded on hard rock, the
column end may be modelled as fixed (located at the top of
the footing)
– Single pile: Fixed support of the column is recommended
at a depth of five to ten times the diameter of pile,
depending upon the type of soil, from the top of pile cap.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
24. 24
Supports (cont…):
• Pinned supports:
– Isolated footing: Support to be provided at the column
ends, (located at the bottom of the foundation).
• Spring supports:
– Spring supports can be provided with spring constants ,
eg., as per ASCE/SEI 41 (2006)
• In General
– Engineering judgement must be exercised in modelling the
support
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
25. 25
Slabs and Masonry walls
• The weight of slabs are distributed, as 2-way load
distribution, on the supporting beams.
• The weight of masonry walls are applied as uniform
load on the supporting beam
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
26. 26
Diaphragms
• Since the slabs are not modelled by plate elements, the
structural effect due to their in-plane stiffness (7.6.3 (b),
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) can be taken into account as Rigid
Diaphragms by
– using ‘Master/Slave’ option (STAAD.Pro)
– assigning ‘Diaphragm’ action (ETABS , STAAD.Pro V8i
SS4 onwards)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
27. 27
Diaphragms
• This method is to be resorted to, only if the slab is stiff
enough to act as a rigid diaphragm
• This is to be ascertained as per criteria specified in
7.6.4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
28. 28
Diaphragms
• Diaphragms have to be checked whether they can be
considered rigid (7.6.4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) by
– considering a floor independently,
– modelling the floor with shell elements & meshing it,
– applying a lateral load at its to be ‘Diaphragm centre’
– checking it’s deformation
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
29. 29
Diaphragms
• A floor diaphragm is considered to be flexible, if it deforms
such that the maximum lateral displacement measured from the
chord of the deformed shape at any point of the diaphragm is
more than 1 .2 times the average displacement of the entire
diaphragm (7.6.4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016).
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
30. 30
Diaphragms
• This method is to be resorted to, only if the slab is stiff
enough to act as a rigid diaphragm
• This is to be ascertained as per criteria specified in
7.6.4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016
• If the criteria is not met:
• The storey loads are to be distributed at the column points
of the floor, proportionate to the floor mass distribution
7.6.4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016
• In tall buildings, the in-plane stiffness of the floor slab is to
be modelled (using meshed shell elements) -- 7.3.3,
IS:16700-2017 #
# for buildings in its purview
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
31. 31
Assign diaphragms: select all slabs in a storey and …
ETABS: Floor Diaphragm
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
37. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• Masonry infill walls have in-plane stiffness that can
influence the behaviour of the building under lateral load.
- Effects of infill walls are to be modelled, and then stiffness
irregularity* to be examined for (7.9.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
- Effects of infill walls are to be modelled, for analysis, if they
contribute to lateral stiffness# (7.3.4, IS:16700-2017)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
• Masonry infills are modelled by
equivalent diagonal struts with
pinned ends (7.9.2.2, IS:1893(Part 1)-
2016)
* as per Table 6, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016
# for buildings coming under it’s
purview.
38. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• The properties of the diagonal struts are modelled according
to the following:
- Modulus of Elasticity as per 7.9.2.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016
- Where fm is the compressive strength of masonry (MPa), given by
- Where fmo is the strength of mortar in the masonry, as per IS:1905-1987
and fb is the strength of bricks in the masonry, as per IS:1077-1992
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
39. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• The properties of the diagonal struts are modelled according
to the following:
- For the cross section of the strut, the terms used are: ‘thickness’ is the
horizontal dimension of the diagonal strut cross section; and ‘width’ is
the vertical dimension of cross section, measured perpendicular to the
inclination of the strut.
- For URM infill walls without any opening, width, Wds of equivalent
diagonal strut is:
- Where Lds is the (diagonal) length of the strut and
- Where.. (continued on next page)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
40. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• The properties of the diagonal struts are modelled according
to the following:
- where (continued from previous page)
- Em = modulus of elasticity of the materials of the infill
- Ef = modulus of elasticity of the materials of the RC frame,
- Ic = moment of inertia of the adjoining column,
- t = thickness of the infill wall
- θ = the angle of the diagonal strut with the horizontal;
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
41. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• The properties of the diagonal struts are modelled according
to the following:
- In case of infill walls with openings, no reduction in strut width is
required (IS:1893-2016, Cl. 7.9.2.2(c))
- But it is known that openings reduce the stiffness of the diagonal strut,
and the reduction is to be incorporated by suitably reducing the width of
the strut.
- The procedure given for calculating Wds is found to be developed by
Mainstone & Weeks (1971) by utilising the formulae by Smith & Carter
(1969) .
- For reduction factors to account for openings in the masonry infills,
many formulae have been developed. .. (continued on next page)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
42. Slabs and masonry walls (cont…)
• The properties of the diagonal struts are modelled according
to the following:
- For example, Al-Chaar (2002) has developed a formula for the
reduction factor due to openings. In his procedure, the reduction factor
ρw the thickness of the strut to account for the effect of openings is
- where Ao = area of the opening
Ap = area of the infill panel (= l.h)
- Subject to the condition that if Ao ≥ 60% of Ap, then ρw should be
taken as zero.
- ρw is the reduction factor for Wds, as
Wdo = ρw .Wds
- As of now (without any Amendment being published), the above
reduction factor is not supported by the IS:1893-2016 code.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
43. 43
Masonry walls (Table 6 (i), IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) :
• The Structural Plan Density (SPD) should be
estimated when unreinforced masonry (URM)
infills are used.
• When SPD of masonry infills exceeds 20%, the
effect of URM infills shall be considered by
explicitly modeling the same in structural analysis
(by diagonal struts).
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
44. 44
Masonry walls (Table 6 (i), IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) :
• The design forces for RC members shall be larger
of that obtained from analysis of:
• a) Bare frame, and
• b) Frames with URM infills, using 3D modeling of the
structure.
• In buildings designed considering URM infills, the
inter-storey drift shall be limited to 0.2 percent in
the storey with stiffening and also in all storeys
below.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
45. 45
Shear walls
• Structural shear walls and Shear core which are integrally
connected to the frame and floor slabs, can be modelled by
plate elements
– ‘Surface elements’ (STAAD.Pro V8i and earlier)
– Shell elements (STAAD.Pro Connect Edition and later)
– ‘Wall element’ (ETABS)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
46. 46
Other considerations
• Staircase slabs built integrally with the frame should be
modelled (5.4, IS:13920-2015; 8.1.2 , IS:16700-2017)*
• Provide sliding joints at the interconnection of the stairs with
floors, so that they will not act as diagonal bracing (5.5,
IS:4326-1993). If it is not providable, either of the following
may be adopted instead:
• Separated Staircases — staircase carried by a structure separated from
the building (with a vertical separation joint between the two), in
which one end of the staircase rests on a wall and the other end is
carried by columns and beams.
• Built-in Staircase — When stairs are built monolithically with floors,
RC walls are provided at either side of the stairs, extending through
the entire height of the stairs and to the building foundations.
*(for buildings coming under its purview)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
47. 47
Other considerations
• Staircase slabs built integrally with the frame should be
modelled (5.4, IS:13920-2015; 8.1.2 , IS:16700-2017)
• Buildings with any irregularities listed in IS:1893(Part 1),
buildings with floating columns and set-back columns, a
detailed Non-linear analysis is to be done (5.5, IS:13920-
2016).
• As of now, the most practical approach to doing a Non-linear analysis
is the Non-linear Static Procedure (NSP), better known as Pushover
analysis
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
48. 48
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• ETABS does this automatically
• With STAAD.Pro V8i, one has to do this manually
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
49. 49
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• P- Δ analysis to be done (7.2(d) & 7.3.9, IS:16700-2017)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
51. 51
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• P- Δ (P-Delta) analysis to be done (7.2(d) & 7.3.9, IS:16700-2017)
• STAAD.Pro & ETABS has conceptually different approaches
to P- Δ, and correspondingly the settings/parameters to be
provided also are different:
• In STAAD.Pro, the gravity loads (DL & LL) and the seismic loads
are to be combined using the REPEAT LOAD option instead of the
LOAD COMBINATION option, and then PDELTA analysis is run.
• In STAAD.Pro, only Seismic Coefficient Method can be included
with P- Δ analysis, not the Response Spectrum Method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
53. 53
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• P- Δ (P-Delta) analysis to be done (7.2(d) & 7.3.9, IS:16700-2017)
• STAAD.Pro & ETABS has conceptually different approaches
to P- Δ, and correspondingly the settings/parameters to be
provided also are different:
• In ETABS, a load combination is to be specified, which is considered
for the P- Δ analysis
• This load combination is the most critical one from among the codal
seismic load combinations, but with the seismic part omitted. In
IS:1893-2016 (with the most critical one in pink) these are
1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EL 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL
1.5 DL + 1.5 EL 1.5 DL
0.9 DL + 1.5 EL 0.9 DL
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
56. 56
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• P- Δ analysis to be done (7.2(d) & 7.3.9, IS:16700-2017)
• Construction Sequence analysis to be done for buildings
taller than 150 m (7.3.13, IS:16700-2017)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
68. 68
Other considerations for tall buildings
• The model should incorporate rigid end offsets at the joints
(7.2 (a), IS:16700-2017)
• P- Δ analysis to be done (7.2(d) & 7.3.9, IS:16700-2017)
• Construction Sequence analysis to be done for buildings
taller than 150 m (7.3.13, IS:16700-2017)
• Note: a case with floating columns has been demonstrated only
because the effects of construction sequence are most prominent in
such cases.
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
69. 69
Analysis as per IS:1893-2016
Seismic Coefficient Method
(Static Analysis)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
70. 70
Static analysis:
• The Design horizontal seismic coefficient Ah is
calculated from (6.4.2, IS:1893 (Part 1)-2016)
– Zone factor Z (Table 3 & Fig. 1, IS:1893 (Part 1)-2016)
– Importance factor I (Table 8, IS:1893 (Part 1)-2016)
– Response reduction factor R (Table 9, IS:1893 (Part 1)-2016)
– Horizontal Acceleration coefficient Sa/g
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
71. 71
Static analysis:
• Where the Horizontal acceleration Sa/g is determined
from the Response spectrum curve (Fig.2A, IS:1893(Part
1)-2016) -- Modified
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
72. 72
Static analysis:
• Where the Horizontal acceleration Sa/g is determined from the
Response spectrum curve (Fig.2A, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016 –
Modified)
• Separate Response Spectrum curves are given for Seismic
Coefficient Method and Response Spectrum Methods (Fig.2A &
2B, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) – New
• Also the both the Response Spectrum curves are horizontal
straight lines after T = 4s. – Modified (Earlier, the code was
silent on the portion of the curve for T > 4s)
• But the above is insignificant in case of Fig.2A, IS:1893(Part
1)-2016 since the Seismic Coefficient Method is only applicable
for regular structures having T < 0.4s (6.4.3, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) -
- New
• Unless, of course, the method is to be used for Base Shear correction (to
be covered later)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
76. 76
Static analysis:
• The time period of the structure is determined using
(7.6.2 (a) & 7.6.2 (c), IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
– RC frames without brick infills
h = height of building in m
– RC frames with brick infills
d = base dimension in m
(parallel to direction of earthquake)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
77. 77
Static analysis:
• The time period of the structure is determined using
(7.6.2 (a) & 7.6.2 (c), IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
– Buildings with RC walls (7.6.2 (b), IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) --New
Aw = total effectie cross-sectional area of
RC wall in the first storey in m2
Awi = cross-sectional area of RC
wall i in the first storey in m2
Lwi = length of RC wall i in the first
storey in m
(both for walls parallel to direction of earthquake)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
78. 78
Static analysis:
• The time period for irregular configurations is calculated for
parameters determined as per the following figures (Fig.5 ,
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) --New
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
79. 79
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Static analysis (cont…):
• Where the type of soils are
– Type I (Rock or Hard soil): N > 30, among other descriptions
– Type II (Medium soils): 10 ≤ N ≤ 30 for all soils
N >15 for poorly graded, among
other descriptions
– Type III (Soft soils): N < 10
(Table 4, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
• Where the N values are taken as the weighted average
of N values of soil layers up to 30m below ground level
(6.4.2.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) -- New
80. 80
Presented by Rahul LeslieSeismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building
6.4.2, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016,
description of (Sa/g) - (a)
81. 81
Presented by Rahul LeslieSeismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building
6.4.2, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016,
description of (Sa/g) - (a)
82. 82
Static analysis:
• Zone factor (Table 3, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
– Z = 0.10 for Zone II
– Z = 0.16 for Zone I II
– Z = 0.24 for Zone IV
– Z = 0.36 for Zone V
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
83. 83
Static analysis:
• Importance factor (Table 8, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
– I = 1.5 for special buildings (including community halls)
– I = 1.2 for residential and commercial buildings
with occupancy > 200 persons -- New
– I = 1.0 for other buildings
• Response reduction factor (Table 9, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
– R = 3 for ordinary detailing (with ordinary detailed shear
wall, if any)
– R = 5 for ductile detailing (with ductile detailed shear wall, if
any) ie., as per IS:13920-2016
– R = 4 for ductile detailing with ordinary detailed shear wall
– R = 4 for ordinary detailing with ductile detailed shear wall
– R = 3 for ordinary detailing with ordinary detailed shear wall
– R = 5 for ductile detailing with ductile detailed shear wall
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
84. 84
Static analysis (cont…):
• The base shear is determined by (7.2.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-
2016)...
... but subject to the condition that VB ≥ (VB)min (7.2.2,
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) – New ...
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
85. 85
Static analysis (cont…):
• Where (VB)min is to be determined from ρ, given as the
percentage of weight of the building (Table 7,
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)...
(VB)min = ρW
... which is, in effect, as good as saying, for eg., for a
structure in Zone III, Medium soil, I = 1.0 and R = 5,
that T should be taken as not more than Tmin = 1.98s
(by back calculating from ρ to Sa/g, and Sa/g to Tmin)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Zone ρ
II 0.7
III 1.1
IV 1.6
V 2.4
86. 86
Static analysis (cont…):
• For tall buildings, ρ is determined from (Table 5,
IS:16700-2018)...
(VB)min = ρW
... for buildings of intermediate heights (ie., in the
range of 120 to 200m), interpolation is to be used
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Zone
ρ for
H≤120m
ρ for
H≥200m
II 0.7 0.5
III 1.1 0.75
IV 1.6 1.25
V 2.4 1.75
87. 87
Static analysis (cont…):
• The base shear is determined by (7.2.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-
2016)...
... but subject to the condition that VB ≥ (VB)min (7.2.2,
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016) – New ...
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
• Design lateral force for each level is determined by (7.6.3,
IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)...
... Where Wi is the seismic weight (to be covered) of the i’th storey at
height hi
88. 88
A Simple Example
A six storied structure
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
91. 91
height 18 m
Period 0.075x(18)0.75 = 0.6554 sec
Presented by Rahul LeslieSeismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building
(Assumed to be open structure)
93. 93
The forces are applied …and analysed
Presented by Rahul LeslieSeismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building
94. 94
The forces are applied
Presented by Rahul LeslieSeismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building
95. 95
Seismic Coeff. method
ETABS:
Define & Apply Seismic
parameters:
• Direction
• T
• Z, I, R
• Soil Type
STAAD:
Define Seismic parameters:
• Z, I, R
• Structure Type or
Tx & Tz
• Soil Type
• Damping ratio ξ
Apply
• Direction (X, Y,Z), factor
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
96. 96
ETABS: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
97. 97
ETABS: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
98. 98
ETABS: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
99. 99
ETABS: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
100. 100
STAAD: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
101. 101
STAAD: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
102. 102
STAAD: Seismic coeff. method
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
103. 103
Masses to be included:
• For seismic analysis, the effective masses to be
included for analysis are (7.4.1, IS:1893(Part 1)-
2016) :
– Full dead load
– 0.25 times Imposed Loads having intensity ≤ 3 kN/m2
– 0.5 times Imposed Loads having intensity > 3 kN/m2
– 0.2 times Snow Loads exceeding 1.5 kN/m2 -- New
– Imposed Load on roof need not be considered
(7.3.1, 7.3.2 , 7.3.5 & Table 10, IS:1893(Part 1)-2016)
• The earlier edition clause that Live load reduction for upper
floors (as per 3.2, IS:875(Part 2) - 1987) shall not be applied
further for mass calculation in now missing – it was
mentioned in 7.3.3, IS:1893 (Part 1) – 2002
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
104. 104
Add Seismic Masses
EATBS
• Select loads to
combine
STAAD
• Add self wt., Joint
loads, Member loads,
Floor loads
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
122. 122
Results of Seismic Analysis –
Bending Moment & Shear Force
• Gravity Loads – Bending Moment
• Gravity Loads – Shear Force
• Seismic Loads – Bending Moment
• Seismic Loads – Shear Force
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
123. 123
Load combinations: will be covered later
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
130. 130
STAAD: Gravity Loads Bending Moment
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
131. 131
STAAD: Gravity Loads Shear Force
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
132. 132
STAAD: Seismic force in Z direction Bending Moment
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
133. 133
STAAD: Seismic force in Z direction Shear Force
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
134. 134
Analysis as per IS:1893-2016
Response Spectrum Method
(Dynamic Analysis)
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied RC Building Presented by Rahul Leslie
Continued in Part-II with …