Changing the Game in Strategic Sourcing at P&GExpressive Competition enabled by OptimizationDinesh Pradeep | Ramakrishna krishnaswamy | Sunayan PalLavanya Divi        | Arun Kumar  S                         | Amit Kumar
Two moments of truthWas the experience satisfying enough?Will it be a P&G Product?
ComplexitiesSourcing - EvolutionWin-Win deals
Slow
Lacks Transparency
Low levels of competition among suppliersIssues with Reverse AuctionsPoor Allocation Decisions
Optimal bundling based on suppliers preferences and not buyers
Side constraints not supported
Buyer cannot express business rules
Suppliers cannot express production efficiencies – Exposed to bidding risks
Amount and type of information provided by suppliers reduced
Suppliers forced to cut their profit margins
Suppliers not allowed to compete on their strengths through collaboration with the buyers
Buyers lacked adequate tools for balancing cost savingsCombineNet REVCombineNet’s REV – An industry-independent optimization-based market-clearing engineP&G’s ApproachBusiness Rules and Stakeholder preferences
Limiting the total number of suppliers
Bundled Offers
Conditional Volume Discounts
Innovative Alternative Item specificationsInitial BenefitsAroma Chemicals Purchase300 items and numerous suppliersSavings upto 13.5 %Reduction in the number of suppliersQuantitative understanding of the cost of business rulesExtended it to six sourcing eventsSavings of about $100 mn
Expressive CompetitionExpressive Competition – The Paradigm ShiftExpressive AllocationEvaluationExpressive CompetitionExpressive Bidding
Expressive BiddingSuppliers bid on an arbitrary number of self constructed package of itemsSuppliers offer rich forms of discount schedulingSuppliers can offer conditional discountsSuppliers can specify a broad variety of side constraintsSuppliers can bid using attributesSuppliers can express free-form alternatesSuppliers can express detailed cost drivers
Expressive Allocation EvaluationI don’t want more than 200 winnersBuyer can express
Operational Constraints
Legal Constraints

P&G