OESOPHAGOSCOPY
B y R a a f i U l B a s h e e r Z a r g a r
 INTRODUCTION
 TYPES
 INDICATIONS
 CONTRAINDICATIONS
 ANESTHESIA
 POSITION
 TECHNIQUE
 STRUCTURES SEEN
 POSTOPERATIVE CARE
 COMPLICATIONS
 OVERVIEW
IT’S A PROCEDURE TO EXAMINE THE
OESHPHAGUS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND
THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES
 INTRODUCTION
1.RIGID OESOPHAGOSCOPY
2.FLEXIBLE FIBREOPTIC OESOPHAGOSCOPY
3.TRANSNASAL OESOPHAGOSCOPY
 TYPES
TO INVESTIGATE CAUSE OF:
-DYSPHAGIA
-RETROSTERNAL PAIN
-HAEMATEMESIS
-SECONDARIES OF NECK
DIAGNOSTIC
 INDICATIONS
-REMOVAL OF FOREIGN BODY
-DILATATION OF THE OESOPHAGUS
-ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF BENIGN
LESIONS
-INSERTION OF SOUTTAR’S OR MOUSSEAU-
BARBIN TUBE IN PALLIATIVE TREATMENT
OF OESOPHAGEAL CA
-INJECTION OF OESOPHAGEAL VARICES
THERAPEUTIC
1.TRISMUS
2.DISEASES OF CERVICAL SPINE
3.RECEDING MANDIBLE
4.ANEURYSM OF AORTA
5.HEART, LIVER OR KIDNEY DISEASES
 CONTRAINDICATIONS
PATIENT ADVISED NOTHING TO EAT 3
HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE
 PATIENT PREPARATION
1. RIGID OESOPHAGOSCOPY
 TYPES
GENRAL ANESTHESIA WITH
ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION
ANESTHESIA
POSITION
SWORD SWALLOING POSITION
PROTECTION OF LIPS & TEETH
LUBRICATION OF SCOPE
HOLDING OF THE SCOPE
IDENTIFICATION OF LARYNGOPHARYNX STRUCTURES
ADVANCEMENT FURTHER INTO CRICOPHARYNGEAL SPHINCTER
CROSSING AORTIC ARCH & LEFT BRONCHUS
PASSING THE CARDIA & FOLLOWED BY WITHDRAWL
TECHNIQUES
1.FEATUERES OF OESOPHAGEAL
PERFORATION-INTRASCAPULAR PAIN
-SURGICAL EMPHYSEMA OF NECK
-ABRUPT RISE IN TEMP.
2.DIET-SIPS OF PLAIN WATER FOLLOWED BY USUAL DIET
 POSTOPERATIVE CARE
1.INJURY TO LIPS AND TEETH
2.INJURY TO ARYTENOIDS
3.INJURY TO PHARYNGEAL MUSCLES
4.PERFORATION OF ESOPHAGUS
5.COMPRESSION OF TRACHEA
 COMPLICATION
1.MORE AMENABLE TO THERAPEUTIC
INDICATIONS ESPECIALLY REMOVAL OF
FOREIGN BODIES.
2.BETTER VISUALIZATION OF PROXIMAL ONE-THIRD
OF ESOPHAGUS.
 ADVANTAGES
1.GENERAL ANAESTHESIA.
2.MORE COST AND MORBIDITY TO PATIENT.
3.MORE COMPLICATIONS SUCH AS
4.DENTAL TRAUMA AND OESOPHAGEAL
PERFORATION.
5.CONCOMITANT EXAMINATION OF STOMACH
AND INTESTINE NOT POSSIBLE.
6.NOT AMENABLE TO CASES OF TRISMUS OR
CERVICAL SPINE DEGENERATIVE DISEASES.
DISADVANTAGES
2. FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC ESOPHAGOSCOPY
 POSITION
LEFT LATERAL SUPINE POSITION WITH EXTENDED NECK
 ANESTHESIA
PERFORMED UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH OR
WITHOUT SEDATION
 TECHNIQUE
SAME AS RIGID ESOPHAGOSCOPY
1.AN OUTDOOR PROCEDURE.
2.NO GENERAL ANESTHESIA. IT IS DONE UNDER
LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH OR WITHOUT
INTRAVENOUS SEDATION.
3.LESS MORBIDITY.
4.IT CAN BE DONE IN ABNORMALITIES OF SPINE OR
JAW.
5.GASTROSCOPE ALLOWS EXAMINATION OF
STOMACH AND DUODENUM.
6.GOOD ILLUMINATION AND MAGNIFICATION.
7.ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF THE MUCOSAL
DISEASES.
ADVANTAGES
1.NARROW CHANNEL LIMITS THE SIZE OF
INSTRUMENTS AND REMOVALOF CERTAIN
FOREIGN BODIES.
2.FOREIGN BODY CANNOT BE RETRACTED INTO
THE ENDOSCOPE(LIKE RIGID
ESOPHAGOSCOPE) SO MORE CHANCES OF
INJURINGESOPHAGUS.
3.LARYNGOPHARYNX AND PROXIMAL ONE- THIRD
ESOPHAGUS (LESS DISTENSIBLE WITH
INSUFFLATIONS) MAY NOT BE EXAMINED
ADEQUATELY.
 DISADVANTAGES
3. TRANSNASAL OESOPHAGOSCOPY
 ANESTHESIA
• TOPICAL
1.NOSE: 4% LIDOCAINE
2.OROPHARYNX:20% BENZOCAINE
 POSITION
• SEATED POSITION FACING EXAMINER
SCOPE PASSED ALONG FLOOR OF NOSE
IPSILATERAL PYRIFORM SINUS
ADVANCEMENT INTO ESOPHAGUS
INSUFFLATION OF ESOPHAGUS
FURTHER ADVANCEMNT OF SCOPE INTO STOMACH
SCOPE RETROFLEXED TO SEE COMPLETE VIEW OF GE JUNCTION
WITHDRAWL
TECHNIQUES
1.IMPROVED SAFETY
2.DECREASED OVERALL COSTS
3.PATIENT PREFERENCE
 ADVANTAGES
1.MULTIPLE BIOPSIES
2.VESSEL LIGATIONS
3.MANY THERAPEUTIC INSTRUMENTS
 DISADVANTAGES
THANK YOU

Oesophagoscopy

  • 1.
    OESOPHAGOSCOPY B y Ra a f i U l B a s h e e r Z a r g a r
  • 2.
     INTRODUCTION  TYPES INDICATIONS  CONTRAINDICATIONS  ANESTHESIA  POSITION  TECHNIQUE  STRUCTURES SEEN  POSTOPERATIVE CARE  COMPLICATIONS  OVERVIEW
  • 3.
    IT’S A PROCEDURETO EXAMINE THE OESHPHAGUS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES  INTRODUCTION
  • 4.
    1.RIGID OESOPHAGOSCOPY 2.FLEXIBLE FIBREOPTICOESOPHAGOSCOPY 3.TRANSNASAL OESOPHAGOSCOPY  TYPES
  • 5.
    TO INVESTIGATE CAUSEOF: -DYSPHAGIA -RETROSTERNAL PAIN -HAEMATEMESIS -SECONDARIES OF NECK DIAGNOSTIC  INDICATIONS
  • 6.
    -REMOVAL OF FOREIGNBODY -DILATATION OF THE OESOPHAGUS -ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF BENIGN LESIONS -INSERTION OF SOUTTAR’S OR MOUSSEAU- BARBIN TUBE IN PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF OESOPHAGEAL CA -INJECTION OF OESOPHAGEAL VARICES THERAPEUTIC
  • 7.
    1.TRISMUS 2.DISEASES OF CERVICALSPINE 3.RECEDING MANDIBLE 4.ANEURYSM OF AORTA 5.HEART, LIVER OR KIDNEY DISEASES  CONTRAINDICATIONS
  • 8.
    PATIENT ADVISED NOTHINGTO EAT 3 HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE  PATIENT PREPARATION
  • 9.
  • 10.
    GENRAL ANESTHESIA WITH ENDOTRACHEALINTUBATION ANESTHESIA POSITION SWORD SWALLOING POSITION
  • 11.
    PROTECTION OF LIPS& TEETH LUBRICATION OF SCOPE HOLDING OF THE SCOPE IDENTIFICATION OF LARYNGOPHARYNX STRUCTURES ADVANCEMENT FURTHER INTO CRICOPHARYNGEAL SPHINCTER CROSSING AORTIC ARCH & LEFT BRONCHUS PASSING THE CARDIA & FOLLOWED BY WITHDRAWL TECHNIQUES
  • 13.
    1.FEATUERES OF OESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION-INTRASCAPULARPAIN -SURGICAL EMPHYSEMA OF NECK -ABRUPT RISE IN TEMP. 2.DIET-SIPS OF PLAIN WATER FOLLOWED BY USUAL DIET  POSTOPERATIVE CARE
  • 14.
    1.INJURY TO LIPSAND TEETH 2.INJURY TO ARYTENOIDS 3.INJURY TO PHARYNGEAL MUSCLES 4.PERFORATION OF ESOPHAGUS 5.COMPRESSION OF TRACHEA  COMPLICATION
  • 15.
    1.MORE AMENABLE TOTHERAPEUTIC INDICATIONS ESPECIALLY REMOVAL OF FOREIGN BODIES. 2.BETTER VISUALIZATION OF PROXIMAL ONE-THIRD OF ESOPHAGUS.  ADVANTAGES
  • 16.
    1.GENERAL ANAESTHESIA. 2.MORE COSTAND MORBIDITY TO PATIENT. 3.MORE COMPLICATIONS SUCH AS 4.DENTAL TRAUMA AND OESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION. 5.CONCOMITANT EXAMINATION OF STOMACH AND INTESTINE NOT POSSIBLE. 6.NOT AMENABLE TO CASES OF TRISMUS OR CERVICAL SPINE DEGENERATIVE DISEASES. DISADVANTAGES
  • 17.
  • 18.
     POSITION LEFT LATERALSUPINE POSITION WITH EXTENDED NECK  ANESTHESIA PERFORMED UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH OR WITHOUT SEDATION  TECHNIQUE SAME AS RIGID ESOPHAGOSCOPY
  • 19.
    1.AN OUTDOOR PROCEDURE. 2.NOGENERAL ANESTHESIA. IT IS DONE UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH OR WITHOUT INTRAVENOUS SEDATION. 3.LESS MORBIDITY. 4.IT CAN BE DONE IN ABNORMALITIES OF SPINE OR JAW. 5.GASTROSCOPE ALLOWS EXAMINATION OF STOMACH AND DUODENUM. 6.GOOD ILLUMINATION AND MAGNIFICATION. 7.ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF THE MUCOSAL DISEASES. ADVANTAGES
  • 20.
    1.NARROW CHANNEL LIMITSTHE SIZE OF INSTRUMENTS AND REMOVALOF CERTAIN FOREIGN BODIES. 2.FOREIGN BODY CANNOT BE RETRACTED INTO THE ENDOSCOPE(LIKE RIGID ESOPHAGOSCOPE) SO MORE CHANCES OF INJURINGESOPHAGUS. 3.LARYNGOPHARYNX AND PROXIMAL ONE- THIRD ESOPHAGUS (LESS DISTENSIBLE WITH INSUFFLATIONS) MAY NOT BE EXAMINED ADEQUATELY.  DISADVANTAGES
  • 21.
  • 22.
     ANESTHESIA • TOPICAL 1.NOSE:4% LIDOCAINE 2.OROPHARYNX:20% BENZOCAINE  POSITION • SEATED POSITION FACING EXAMINER
  • 23.
    SCOPE PASSED ALONGFLOOR OF NOSE IPSILATERAL PYRIFORM SINUS ADVANCEMENT INTO ESOPHAGUS INSUFFLATION OF ESOPHAGUS FURTHER ADVANCEMNT OF SCOPE INTO STOMACH SCOPE RETROFLEXED TO SEE COMPLETE VIEW OF GE JUNCTION WITHDRAWL TECHNIQUES
  • 25.
    1.IMPROVED SAFETY 2.DECREASED OVERALLCOSTS 3.PATIENT PREFERENCE  ADVANTAGES
  • 26.
    1.MULTIPLE BIOPSIES 2.VESSEL LIGATIONS 3.MANYTHERAPEUTIC INSTRUMENTS  DISADVANTAGES
  • 27.