Åpne læringsressurser - presentasjon Bibsys-konferansen 12. mars 2014, TrondheimTore Hoel
En innføring i åpne læringsressurser rettet mot bibliotekarer. (Presentasjonen ble fulgt opp av en innledning av Rolf K. Baltzersen om hans prosjekt med å lage en lærebok som en åpen ressurs - se http://praksisveilederen.pressbooks.com
Towards Open Architectures and Interoperability for Learning Analytics Tore Hoel
Tore Hoel presented on the need for open architectures and interoperability standards for learning analytics. Key challenges include a lack of trust, different data schemas and sources being used, and privacy and data ownership issues. Standards are needed for activity streams, vocabularies, storage designs, and algorithms. While initiatives exist, there is no single European leader coordinating standardization efforts for learning analytics.
Towards a Semantic Infrastructure for Learning, Education and Training?Tore Hoel
This document summarizes a conference on semantics and discusses the need for a semantic infrastructure to facilitate learning, education, and training. It notes that while standards like RDF and Topic Maps help machines and humans understand each other, a lack of tools and trust slows their adoption. The document proposes building an infrastructure with published subject identifiers and sharing ontologies and vocabularies. It describes some Norwegian projects demonstrating semantic approaches and concludes that simple recommendations, identifiers, and showcasing tools can help exchange information and create a semantic hub.
Learning Analytics - Vision of the FutureTore Hoel
The document summarizes a presentation about the future of learning analytics given by Tore Hoel. Some key points:
- The presentation discusses the European LACE project, which aims to integrate communities working on learning analytics in schools, workplaces and universities.
- Seven visions of the future of learning analytics in 2025 are presented, including scenarios where analytics are used for educational management, support self-directed learning, or are rarely used due to privacy and data issues.
- The presentation concludes by discussing open systems for learning analytics and international communities focused on this topic.
Lightweight approaches to standardization such as XCRI focus on short development time, open membership, and interoperability over formal endorsement and conformance. XCRI was created to address the lack of a standard for exchanging course information between university systems. It has gained adoption through practical pilots and now engages with policymakers to support reengineering of education sector processes. As XCRI matures, it aims to work more closely with vendors and participate in formal standardization processes.
Workshop on Learning Analytics @ EDEN15 in Barcelona - June 2015Tore Hoel
Slide for the workshop Learning Analytics – What Data Could Tell If We Were Willing to Share Information - with Tore Hoel, Dai Griffith, and Sally Reynolds - at EDEN conference in Barcelona 10 June 2015
Åpne læringsressurser - presentasjon Bibsys-konferansen 12. mars 2014, TrondheimTore Hoel
En innføring i åpne læringsressurser rettet mot bibliotekarer. (Presentasjonen ble fulgt opp av en innledning av Rolf K. Baltzersen om hans prosjekt med å lage en lærebok som en åpen ressurs - se http://praksisveilederen.pressbooks.com
Towards Open Architectures and Interoperability for Learning Analytics Tore Hoel
Tore Hoel presented on the need for open architectures and interoperability standards for learning analytics. Key challenges include a lack of trust, different data schemas and sources being used, and privacy and data ownership issues. Standards are needed for activity streams, vocabularies, storage designs, and algorithms. While initiatives exist, there is no single European leader coordinating standardization efforts for learning analytics.
Towards a Semantic Infrastructure for Learning, Education and Training?Tore Hoel
This document summarizes a conference on semantics and discusses the need for a semantic infrastructure to facilitate learning, education, and training. It notes that while standards like RDF and Topic Maps help machines and humans understand each other, a lack of tools and trust slows their adoption. The document proposes building an infrastructure with published subject identifiers and sharing ontologies and vocabularies. It describes some Norwegian projects demonstrating semantic approaches and concludes that simple recommendations, identifiers, and showcasing tools can help exchange information and create a semantic hub.
Learning Analytics - Vision of the FutureTore Hoel
The document summarizes a presentation about the future of learning analytics given by Tore Hoel. Some key points:
- The presentation discusses the European LACE project, which aims to integrate communities working on learning analytics in schools, workplaces and universities.
- Seven visions of the future of learning analytics in 2025 are presented, including scenarios where analytics are used for educational management, support self-directed learning, or are rarely used due to privacy and data issues.
- The presentation concludes by discussing open systems for learning analytics and international communities focused on this topic.
Lightweight approaches to standardization such as XCRI focus on short development time, open membership, and interoperability over formal endorsement and conformance. XCRI was created to address the lack of a standard for exchanging course information between university systems. It has gained adoption through practical pilots and now engages with policymakers to support reengineering of education sector processes. As XCRI matures, it aims to work more closely with vendors and participate in formal standardization processes.
Workshop on Learning Analytics @ EDEN15 in Barcelona - June 2015Tore Hoel
Slide for the workshop Learning Analytics – What Data Could Tell If We Were Willing to Share Information - with Tore Hoel, Dai Griffith, and Sally Reynolds - at EDEN conference in Barcelona 10 June 2015
Implications of the European Data Protection Regulations for Learning Analyti...Tore Hoel
The document discusses the implications of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for the design of learning analytics (LA) tools. It analyzes how each stage of the LA process, from data collection to feedback, is affected by the GDPR's new regulations around user consent, data access and portability, security, and privacy by design. The authors argue the GDPR gives designers a two-year window to build LA tools that comply through open architectures, personal data stores, and conversational capabilities respecting user rights. They call for further comparative studies of different regions' approaches to help guide responsible and privacy-aware LA development.
Paradoxes in standardisation of technologies for Learning, Education and Training - a frustration paper presented at ICCE 2013, Bali, Indonesia on November 21st
Data security issues, ethical issues and challenges to privacy in knowledge-i...Tore Hoel
Presentation at “Finnish-Norwegian Workshop in Learning Analytics”, Helsinki, 21-22 May 2015. Organised by The Research Council of Norway and Academy of Finland
Scaling up learning analytics solutions: Is privacy a show-stopper?Tore Hoel
1) The document discusses the challenges of scaling up learning analytics solutions from research labs to the classroom in light of privacy and ethics concerns.
2) It notes that learning analytics could be considered unlawful if students do not have control over and consent to how their data is used.
3) The presentation raises important questions about data ownership, student consent, and limiting data collection and use to only what is necessary for educational purposes.
Introduction to Learning Analytics - Framework and Implementation ConcernsTore Hoel
This document provides an introduction to learning analytics, including:
1. A definition of learning analytics as the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of learner data to understand and optimize learning.
2. An overview of how learning analytics is used in universities, schools, and the workplace to predict student performance, track progress, and personalize instruction.
3. A framework model showing how data is transformed into analytics and insights to benefit learners, teachers, and institutions.
The document discusses requirements for learning analytics based on a lecture and workshop at East China Normal University. It begins with introductions and then outlines the day's plan to discuss definitions of analytics, actors in learning analytics, framework models, and requirements. It emphasizes starting with pedagogy and poses questions about what data is available and how to build trust. Ethical challenges are noted around data protection, privacy, transparency, and purpose. The goal is to use analytics to facilitate learning while avoiding instructivist approaches and stress for learners.
Learning Analytics – Opportunities for ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC36 standardisationTore Hoel
1) The document discusses opportunities for standardization in learning analytics, including harmonizing activity stream specifications, building vocabularies, storage designs, privacy and data protection, and sharing algorithms and predictive models.
2) It analyzes characteristics of educational big data like varied data sources and formats, and calls for standards to bring these diverse data together and make them interoperable and meaningful for learners and teachers.
3) The document reviews several emerging specifications and tools in learning analytics, and identifies challenges for standardization in areas like privacy, personal data stores, data analysis, and sharing models and algorithms.
Implications of the European Data Protection Regulations for Learning Analyti...Tore Hoel
The document discusses the implications of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for the design of learning analytics (LA) tools. It analyzes how each stage of the LA process, from data collection to feedback, is affected by the GDPR's new regulations around user consent, data access and portability, security, and privacy by design. The authors argue the GDPR gives designers a two-year window to build LA tools that comply through open architectures, personal data stores, and conversational capabilities respecting user rights. They call for further comparative studies of different regions' approaches to help guide responsible and privacy-aware LA development.
Paradoxes in standardisation of technologies for Learning, Education and Training - a frustration paper presented at ICCE 2013, Bali, Indonesia on November 21st
Data security issues, ethical issues and challenges to privacy in knowledge-i...Tore Hoel
Presentation at “Finnish-Norwegian Workshop in Learning Analytics”, Helsinki, 21-22 May 2015. Organised by The Research Council of Norway and Academy of Finland
Scaling up learning analytics solutions: Is privacy a show-stopper?Tore Hoel
1) The document discusses the challenges of scaling up learning analytics solutions from research labs to the classroom in light of privacy and ethics concerns.
2) It notes that learning analytics could be considered unlawful if students do not have control over and consent to how their data is used.
3) The presentation raises important questions about data ownership, student consent, and limiting data collection and use to only what is necessary for educational purposes.
Introduction to Learning Analytics - Framework and Implementation ConcernsTore Hoel
This document provides an introduction to learning analytics, including:
1. A definition of learning analytics as the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of learner data to understand and optimize learning.
2. An overview of how learning analytics is used in universities, schools, and the workplace to predict student performance, track progress, and personalize instruction.
3. A framework model showing how data is transformed into analytics and insights to benefit learners, teachers, and institutions.
The document discusses requirements for learning analytics based on a lecture and workshop at East China Normal University. It begins with introductions and then outlines the day's plan to discuss definitions of analytics, actors in learning analytics, framework models, and requirements. It emphasizes starting with pedagogy and poses questions about what data is available and how to build trust. Ethical challenges are noted around data protection, privacy, transparency, and purpose. The goal is to use analytics to facilitate learning while avoiding instructivist approaches and stress for learners.
Learning Analytics – Opportunities for ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC36 standardisationTore Hoel
1) The document discusses opportunities for standardization in learning analytics, including harmonizing activity stream specifications, building vocabularies, storage designs, privacy and data protection, and sharing algorithms and predictive models.
2) It analyzes characteristics of educational big data like varied data sources and formats, and calls for standards to bring these diverse data together and make them interoperable and meaningful for learners and teachers.
3) The document reviews several emerging specifications and tools in learning analytics, and identifies challenges for standardization in areas like privacy, personal data stores, data analysis, and sharing models and algorithms.
Dette er et hefte til bruk for lærere i ungdomsskolen og videregående. Læreren kan bruke hele heftet, eller selv velge ut hvilke oppgaver hun synes passer best for sin klasse. Heftet er ment å kombineres med et besøk på Norsk Døvemuseum. Lykke til!
This document discusses challenges for the higher education sector in implementing learning analytics at scale. It begins with an overview of learning analytics and its potential uses. Key challenges mentioned include developing a consensus approach for Norway, addressing privacy issues, establishing infrastructure for data handling and analysis, and developing standards and competencies. The document calls for establishing several resources to help institutions, including tools for assessing readiness, developing strategies, conducting research, and managing data and analytics processes according to privacy standards.
Smart Learning Environments - a framework for standardisation?Tore Hoel
1) Smart learning environments (SLEs) could provide a framework for standardizing learning technologies, but the term "smart" is problematic without a clear definition.
2) Existing SLE frameworks from researchers like Koper could structure standards work but may not reflect market needs.
3) Taking a pragmatic approach by developing smaller, self-contained standards informed by—but not dictated by—SLE frameworks may be more effective than large, multipart standards.
Learning analytics in a standardisation contextTore Hoel
This document discusses learning analytics in the context of standardization. It begins by outlining 5 forces that are changing the world: access to data, viewing student data as a resource to be mined and used, concerns about student privacy, and using technology like fitbits and social media monitoring to track students. It then discusses key concepts in learning analytics like definitions, benefits for learners, teachers, and institutions. Other topics covered include the learning analytics process, addressing privacy and data protection, and the potential role of standardization in learning analytics.
Data protection and privacy framework in the design of learning analytics sys...Tore Hoel
Presentation on The Influence of Data Protection and Privacy Frameworks on the Design of Learning Analytics Systems at LAK17, Vancouver, Canada - 2017-03-16
Data Protection by Design and Default for Learning AnalyticsTore Hoel
The Principle of Data Protection by Design and Default as a lever for bringing Pedagogy into the Discourse on Learning Analytics. Workshop presentation at ICCE 2016 conference in Mumbai, India 29 November 2016
Privacy and Data Protection - principles for design of a new part of an ISO s...Tore Hoel
This document discusses privacy and data protection concerns regarding learning analytics and efforts to address them. It outlines several privacy attributes that should be considered when designing learning analytics systems, including the right to be informed, access, rectification, erasure, restricted processing, data portability, and objection. It also discusses requirements around automated decision making, profiling, accountability, and data breaches. The goal is to provide guidance for developing learning analytics tools and architectures that uphold learner privacy within a two year window of opportunity.
Learning Analytics – Ethical questions and dilemmasTore Hoel
Workshop presentation using the Potter Box model of ethical reasoning to discuss concerns and dilemmas of Learning analytics - Open Discovery Space and Learning Analytics Community Exchange projects #laceproject #ods_eu
Introduction to Learner Analytics Session at Oslo Open Forum Conferences prio...Tore Hoel
This document summarizes several projects and initiatives related to learning analytics and standardization. It discusses the Learning Analytics Community Exchange (LACE) project, an ISO study on developing learning analytics standards, the Experience API (xAPI) and Caliper standards, and the Open Learning Analytics initiative. It also describes some technical and cultural issues discussed at other conferences regarding implementing learning analytics and making insights actionable.
Presenting the LACE project at EDEN 14 ZagrebTore Hoel
The document discusses structuring the discourse around learner analytics and educational data mining through the LACE project. It introduces LACE as a 30-month EU-funded project with 9 partners focusing on schools, higher education, and industry. The project aims to create a community around learning analytics and help facilitate discussions on critical dimensions like competence management and assessment, scaling up work-based learning, and quality management. It emphasizes the need for a holistic and systemic approach to learning analytics and the importance of community engagement.
European Learning technology standardisation in crisis due to lack of opennessTore Hoel
This document discusses issues with standardization in European learning technology due to a lack of openness. It notes that the European Commission's policy of requiring free and open specifications clashes with the business model of formal standards organizations like CEN. It also examines differences in how creators, implementers, and users view openness. The document argues that standards bodies should consider implementation factors and seek more user feedback to help address challenges in both developing and adopting standards.
Standards as enablers for innovation in education - a reality checkTore Hoel
This document discusses challenges with the standardization process in education. It notes that standardization is paradoxical, as it aims to both constrain and enable innovation. The standardization process involves creators developing specifications, but there can be barriers to participation that limit input. Standards must balance being comprehensive yet understandable for implementers and users. Feedback from implementers and users is also important but often lacking. Overall, greater engagement is needed from all parties to better support the full innovation cycle from idea to implementation.
19. 1. Verdigrunnlag
I de nordiske land deler vi verdier som
åpenhet og en gjennomsiktig forvaltning,
lik rett til utdanning, og idealet om aktiv
samfunnsdeltakelse. Åpne
læringsressurser (OER) bygger på disse
verdiene. Spredning og bruk av OER vil
være med på å gjøre nordisk utdanning
bedre.
20. 2. Nyskapning
OER reiser nye spørsmål om utdanning.
Slik vil OER spille en stadig mer viktig rolle
i å skape nye og innovative globale
utdanningspraksiser. Det er behov for å
fokusere på hvordan OER kan bidra til
nyskaping for de nordiske
kunnskapsøkonomiene.
21. 3. Utdanningsformer
OER gir organisasjoner en anledning til å
tenke nytt om sine utdanningsmessige og
økonomiske modeller. Å fremme OER
bidrar til å identifisere muligheter og bygge
ned barrierer for høykvalitets læring og
undervisning.
22. 4. Markedsøkonomi
OER som kan deles fritt, betyr ikke slutten
på et marked for åpne læringsressurser.
Forfattere og innholdsleverandører, forlag,
skolemyndigheter og andre bør diskutere
hvordan OER kan bli integrert i det
nordiske utdanningssystem.
23. 5. Bevisstgjøring
Å skape oppmerksomhet er første prioritet for å
fremme OER i de nordiske land. UNESCOs Paris-
deklarasjon og EUs Opening Up Education er
internasjonale initiativ som gir et godt grunnlag for
informasjonsarbeidet. Inspirasjon bør også søkes fra
nordisk politikkutvikling på områder som åpen
kildekode, åpen tilgang til artikler og
forskningsmateriale, åpne data, åpen utdanning,
åpen forskning og åpen innovasjon – siden åpne
læringsressurser er en del av disse åpne praksisene.
24. 6. Kvalitet
Deling fremmer kvalitet i utdanningen, og
åpne læringsressurser bringer et aspekt
av fagfellevurdering til læring og
undervisning. Kvalitet bør være fokuset
ved integrering av OER i nordisk
utdanning.
25. 7. Språk og kultur
De nordiske språkene og kulturene er små og
må finne sin egen rolle i en OER-bevegelse
som er dominert av engelsk språk og anglo-
amerikansk kultur. De nordiske land vil ha
nytte av et nært samarbeid når man søker
egne løsninger på hvordan man kan bidra til
den lokale og den globale OER-allmenningen.
26. 8. Globalt ansvar
OER er et globalt fenomen uten grenser
for hvem som kan publisere
læringsressurer eller hvem som kan bruke
dem. Gjennom å fremme OER vil de
nordiske land kunne styrke sine bidrag til
global utvikling av utdanning.
27. 9. Institusjonsansvar
Utdanningsinstitusjoner bør ha strategi og
konkrete planer for å fremme åpne
læringsressurser. Nordisk samarbeid om
OER bør hjelpe skole, høgskoler,
universitet, yrkesutdanningsinstitusjoner og
andre utdanningsinstitusjoner i å utvikle sin
strategi på området, f.eks. gjennom deling
og utveksling av kunnskap.
28. 10. Myndighetsansvar
Myndighetene er ansvarlige for å sørge for
etablering av gode rammeverk for åpne
læringsressurser. Lokale, regionale og
nasjonale myndigheter bør utvikle politikk
og strategier for bruk av OER innenfor
sine myndighetsområder