MODEL CURRICULUM
Tracey Severns, Ed.D
Deputy Chief Academic Officer NJDOE
Learning Objectives
   Understand the purpose of standards-aligned curriculum

   Understand why the NJDOE developed a “model” CCSS
    aligned curriculum

   Understand “model” curriculum versions 1.0 & 2.0

   Understand how an instructional leader can implement a
    standards-aligned curriculum and assessment system to
    improve achievement

   Understand how a standards-aligned curriculum, effective
    instruction, and formative & summative assessments can
    provide the data PLCs need to improve achievement
Why a “Model” Curriculum

Common Core State Standards
  •   Fewer, clearer, more rigorous
  •   Internationally benchmarked
Commonness
  •   Leverage state and nation-wide expertise (46 States and
      DC)
  •   PARCC (23 States and DC)
Continuous improvement
  •   Model 1.0 & 2.0
The CCSS Difference: Grade 7
           ELA
Before: NJCCCS (2004)
1. Produce written work and oral work that
   demonstrate comprehension of informational
   materials.


After: CCSS (2010)
2. Determine two or more central ideas in a text
   and analyze their development over the
   course of the text; provide an objective
   summary of the text.
The CCSS Difference: Grade 8
           Math
1. Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem.
After: CCSS (2010)



1. Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its
    converse.
2. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to determine
    unknown side lengths in right triangles in real-world
    and mathematical problems in two and three
    dimensions.
3. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to find the distance
   between two points in a coordinate system.
The CCSS Difference: Grade 3-5
 ELA: Integration of Knowledge and
                Ideas

    Grade 3             Grade 4             Grade 5
  Compare and            Integrate           Integrate
   contrast the     information from     information from
most important       two texts on the   several texts on
 points and key        same topic in    the same topic in
details presented   order to write or     order to write or
 in two texts on    speak about the      speak about the
  the same topic          subject             subject
                      knowledgably         knowledgably.
College Readiness : Grade 11
               ELA
   Write arguments to support claim(s) in an analysis of
    substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and
    relevant and sufficient evidence

   Introduce precise knowledgeable claims(s), establish
    the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s)
    from alternate or opposing claims, and create an
    organization that logically sequences claim(s),
    counterclaim(s), reasons and evidence.

   Develop claim(s) and counterclaim(s) fairly and
    thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for
    each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of
    both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s
    knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
Limitations of Textbooks and
               Programs

   CCSS requires the re-evaluation of textbooks,
    materials and programs

   Rubrics for evaluating resources can be found
    at the NJDOE website under CCSS
Model Curriculum 1.0 & 2.0
         Version 1.0                        Version 2.0                     Version 1.0
                                                                              WHEN
           WHAT                               HOW
                                                                       do we know students
   Students need to Learn               We can best Instruct
                                                                           have Learned
                 Student
                                                      Formative
  Standard       Learning         Instruction                          Summative/Formative
                                                     Assessments
                Objectives

CCSS Standard SLO #1          • Model Lessons     • Effective checks
      1                       • Model Tasks         for
              SLO #2          • Engaging            understanding        Unit Assessment
                                Instructional     • Teacher designed         SLOs 1-5
CCSS Standard SLO #3            Strategies          formative
      2                                             assessments
              SLO #4

             SLO #5
                             General Bank of Assessment Items 2.0
Why Unit-based Formative
            Assessments?
   Clarify the level of rigor for SLOs

   Create common expectations in common
    courses

   Provide data to effectively inform classroom
    instruction

   Provide data that can be combined with
    observation data to inform PD
Unit Assessment
Grade 3 sample formative assessment items
Common Standards require
   Common Assessments

Common Core State Standards: critical -
but just the first step
Common Assessments: state comparisons
will increase pressure for performance
Quality Implementation required for actual
improvement in student achievement
Claims Driving Design:
                           ELA/Literacy

     Students are on-track or ready for college and careers


                                                     Students write            Students
      Students read and comprehend                                             build and
                                                    effectively when
      a range of sufficiently complex                                           present
                                                      using and/or
           texts independently                                                knowledge
                                                   analyzing sources.
                                                                                through
                                                                               research
                                                                                and the
                                                                             integration,
                                                               Conventions   comparison,
                     Reading       Vocabulary       Written
      Reading                                                      and
     Literature
                  Informational   Interpretatio
                                                  Expression   Knowledge          and
                       Text        n and Use
                                                               of Language   synthesis of
                                                                                 ideas.

13
Claims Driving Design:
                        Mathematics
     Students are on-track or ready for college and
                        careers

     Solve problems                   Solve problems            Express mathematical
   involving the major          involving the additional            reasoning by
  content for their grade       and supporting content               constructing
 level with connections to       for their grade level with     mathematical arguments
          practices              connections to practices            and critiques



                                                 Demonstrate fluency in
                   Use the modeling
                                                   areas set forth in the
                  practice to solve real
                                                 Standards for Content in
                     world problems
                                                       grades 3-6


14
PARCC Assessment Design
                           English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-11




              2 Optional Assessments/Flexible
                      Administration




Diagnostic Assessment              Mid-Year Assessment              Performance-Based              End-of-Year
 • Early indicator of              • Performance-based               Assessment (PBA)              Assessment
  student knowledge                • Emphasis on hard-               • Extended tasks        • Innovative, computer-
  and skills to inform               to-measure                      • Applications of         based items
  instruction, supports,             standards                         concepts and skills   • Required
  and PD                           • Potentially                     • Required
 •Non-summative                      summative




                                               Speaking And Listening
                                                     Assessment
                                             • Locally scored
                                             • Non-summative, required                                          15
Assessment Transition Timeline
16



                   “Transitional
                   Assessments”

     Spring 2012    Spring 2013      Spring 2014       SY 2014-15
                      NJ ASK           NJ ASK
      NJ ASK                                               Full
                   Aligned to the   Aligned to the   administration
     Aligned to
                        CCSS             CCSS           of PARCC
      NJCCCS
                                                      assessments
Turnaround Principles
   Climate & Culture
   Instructional leadership
   Standards based curriculum, assessment and
    intervention system
   Effective instruction
   Use of Data
   Use of Time
   Family and Community involvement
   Effective Staffing Practices
Instructional Leadership
1.   Set a compelling vision
2.   Develop a plan for meeting the vision with
     measurable goals, aligned strategies and a plan to
     monitor progress
3.   Use data to inform a climate conducive to learning
4.   Develop a culture of high expectations
5.   Ensure standards-aligned curriculum and
     assessment is implemented with fidelity
6.   Ensure formative and summative data is used to
     inform classroom practice
7.   Use informal and formal observations to improve
     instruction
8.   Develop a schedule that supports learning
Ensure a standards-aligned curriculum and
 assessment system is implemented with
                 fidelity
     Review CCSS math practices and grade level
      overviews

     Review CCSS ELA anchor standards

     Review K-12 development of a single anchor
      standard for math and ELA

     Review Unit 1 SLOs and assessment questions
Summative Assessment

   Assessments of Learning (Stiggins)

   Primary users: policy makers, curriculum
    supervisors, principals, teachers, students, parents

   Documents individual or group mastery of
    standards

   Measures achievement status for purposes of
    reporting

   Accountability
Formative Assessment

   Assessments for Learning (Ainsworth)

   Primary users: principals, teachers, students,
    parents

   Measures progress toward intended outcomes

   Provides data on teacher and student
    perforrmance
Benchmark vs. Unit Assessment

Benchmark assessments
 Given 3-4 times per year

 Progress toward the state assessment

 Alignment “guaranteed” by provider

 May be limited to MC



Unit Assessments
 Given at the end of every taught unit

 Progress on taught unit

 Alignment guaranteed by curriculum developers

 Includes MC & Open-ended
Informal and Formal
                Observations
“What gets measured gets managed”

   Lesson plans

   Walkthroughs and evaluations: feedback on
    standards-aligned instruction

   Data reports: Unit assessment data,
    walkthrough data
Use informal and formal
         observations to improve
                instruction
             Effective Instruction
   Clear learning objective aligned to the
    curriculum (teacher & student)
   Engaging and aligned instructional strategies
   Engaging and appropriately rigorous
    standards-aligned student work
   Quality and timely checks for understanding
   Appropriate adjustment based on student
    understanding
   Effective assessment of learning objective to
    inform next lesson
Effective PLC


          A                         B
Staff members meet        Instructional leaders
on a regular basis to     create time for teacher
discuss their work,       collaboration through
work together to          scheduling and
problem solve, reflect    programming, and
on their jobs, and take   guide that
responsibility for what   collaboration.
students learn.
Effective PLC

1. Create a schedule to allow on-going
   collaboration

2. Set agendas and monitor progress on
  deliverables

3. Monitor progress by regularly attending
  meetings and giving the team feedback on
  strengths and areas for improvement
Reflections and Questions
   Discuss an “aha” moment with a partner.

   How will you use this to improve your school
    or district?

   What are you wondering?

Nj model curriculum

  • 1.
    MODEL CURRICULUM Tracey Severns,Ed.D Deputy Chief Academic Officer NJDOE
  • 2.
    Learning Objectives  Understand the purpose of standards-aligned curriculum  Understand why the NJDOE developed a “model” CCSS aligned curriculum  Understand “model” curriculum versions 1.0 & 2.0  Understand how an instructional leader can implement a standards-aligned curriculum and assessment system to improve achievement  Understand how a standards-aligned curriculum, effective instruction, and formative & summative assessments can provide the data PLCs need to improve achievement
  • 3.
    Why a “Model”Curriculum Common Core State Standards • Fewer, clearer, more rigorous • Internationally benchmarked Commonness • Leverage state and nation-wide expertise (46 States and DC) • PARCC (23 States and DC) Continuous improvement • Model 1.0 & 2.0
  • 4.
    The CCSS Difference:Grade 7 ELA Before: NJCCCS (2004) 1. Produce written work and oral work that demonstrate comprehension of informational materials. After: CCSS (2010) 2. Determine two or more central ideas in a text and analyze their development over the course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text.
  • 5.
    The CCSS Difference:Grade 8 Math 1. Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem. After: CCSS (2010) 1. Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse. 2. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to determine unknown side lengths in right triangles in real-world and mathematical problems in two and three dimensions. 3. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to find the distance between two points in a coordinate system.
  • 6.
    The CCSS Difference:Grade 3-5 ELA: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Compare and Integrate Integrate contrast the information from information from most important two texts on the several texts on points and key same topic in the same topic in details presented order to write or order to write or in two texts on speak about the speak about the the same topic subject subject knowledgably knowledgably.
  • 7.
    College Readiness :Grade 11 ELA  Write arguments to support claim(s) in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence  Introduce precise knowledgeable claims(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaim(s), reasons and evidence.  Develop claim(s) and counterclaim(s) fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
  • 8.
    Limitations of Textbooksand Programs  CCSS requires the re-evaluation of textbooks, materials and programs  Rubrics for evaluating resources can be found at the NJDOE website under CCSS
  • 9.
    Model Curriculum 1.0& 2.0 Version 1.0 Version 2.0 Version 1.0 WHEN WHAT HOW do we know students Students need to Learn We can best Instruct have Learned Student Formative Standard Learning Instruction Summative/Formative Assessments Objectives CCSS Standard SLO #1 • Model Lessons • Effective checks 1 • Model Tasks for SLO #2 • Engaging understanding Unit Assessment Instructional • Teacher designed SLOs 1-5 CCSS Standard SLO #3 Strategies formative 2 assessments SLO #4 SLO #5 General Bank of Assessment Items 2.0
  • 10.
    Why Unit-based Formative Assessments?  Clarify the level of rigor for SLOs  Create common expectations in common courses  Provide data to effectively inform classroom instruction  Provide data that can be combined with observation data to inform PD
  • 11.
    Unit Assessment Grade 3sample formative assessment items
  • 12.
    Common Standards require Common Assessments Common Core State Standards: critical - but just the first step Common Assessments: state comparisons will increase pressure for performance Quality Implementation required for actual improvement in student achievement
  • 13.
    Claims Driving Design: ELA/Literacy Students are on-track or ready for college and careers Students write Students Students read and comprehend build and effectively when a range of sufficiently complex present using and/or texts independently knowledge analyzing sources. through research and the integration, Conventions comparison, Reading Vocabulary Written Reading and Literature Informational Interpretatio Expression Knowledge and Text n and Use of Language synthesis of ideas. 13
  • 14.
    Claims Driving Design: Mathematics Students are on-track or ready for college and careers Solve problems Solve problems Express mathematical involving the major involving the additional reasoning by content for their grade and supporting content constructing level with connections to for their grade level with mathematical arguments practices connections to practices and critiques Demonstrate fluency in Use the modeling areas set forth in the practice to solve real Standards for Content in world problems grades 3-6 14
  • 15.
    PARCC Assessment Design English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-11 2 Optional Assessments/Flexible Administration Diagnostic Assessment Mid-Year Assessment Performance-Based End-of-Year • Early indicator of • Performance-based Assessment (PBA) Assessment student knowledge • Emphasis on hard- • Extended tasks • Innovative, computer- and skills to inform to-measure • Applications of based items instruction, supports, standards concepts and skills • Required and PD • Potentially • Required •Non-summative summative Speaking And Listening Assessment • Locally scored • Non-summative, required 15
  • 16.
    Assessment Transition Timeline 16 “Transitional Assessments” Spring 2012 Spring 2013 Spring 2014 SY 2014-15 NJ ASK NJ ASK NJ ASK Full Aligned to the Aligned to the administration Aligned to CCSS CCSS of PARCC NJCCCS assessments
  • 17.
    Turnaround Principles  Climate & Culture  Instructional leadership  Standards based curriculum, assessment and intervention system  Effective instruction  Use of Data  Use of Time  Family and Community involvement  Effective Staffing Practices
  • 18.
    Instructional Leadership 1. Set a compelling vision 2. Develop a plan for meeting the vision with measurable goals, aligned strategies and a plan to monitor progress 3. Use data to inform a climate conducive to learning 4. Develop a culture of high expectations 5. Ensure standards-aligned curriculum and assessment is implemented with fidelity 6. Ensure formative and summative data is used to inform classroom practice 7. Use informal and formal observations to improve instruction 8. Develop a schedule that supports learning
  • 19.
    Ensure a standards-alignedcurriculum and assessment system is implemented with fidelity  Review CCSS math practices and grade level overviews  Review CCSS ELA anchor standards  Review K-12 development of a single anchor standard for math and ELA  Review Unit 1 SLOs and assessment questions
  • 20.
    Summative Assessment  Assessments of Learning (Stiggins)  Primary users: policy makers, curriculum supervisors, principals, teachers, students, parents  Documents individual or group mastery of standards  Measures achievement status for purposes of reporting  Accountability
  • 21.
    Formative Assessment  Assessments for Learning (Ainsworth)  Primary users: principals, teachers, students, parents  Measures progress toward intended outcomes  Provides data on teacher and student perforrmance
  • 22.
    Benchmark vs. UnitAssessment Benchmark assessments  Given 3-4 times per year  Progress toward the state assessment  Alignment “guaranteed” by provider  May be limited to MC Unit Assessments  Given at the end of every taught unit  Progress on taught unit  Alignment guaranteed by curriculum developers  Includes MC & Open-ended
  • 23.
    Informal and Formal Observations “What gets measured gets managed”  Lesson plans  Walkthroughs and evaluations: feedback on standards-aligned instruction  Data reports: Unit assessment data, walkthrough data
  • 24.
    Use informal andformal observations to improve instruction Effective Instruction  Clear learning objective aligned to the curriculum (teacher & student)  Engaging and aligned instructional strategies  Engaging and appropriately rigorous standards-aligned student work  Quality and timely checks for understanding  Appropriate adjustment based on student understanding  Effective assessment of learning objective to inform next lesson
  • 25.
    Effective PLC A B Staff members meet Instructional leaders on a regular basis to create time for teacher discuss their work, collaboration through work together to scheduling and problem solve, reflect programming, and on their jobs, and take guide that responsibility for what collaboration. students learn.
  • 26.
    Effective PLC 1. Createa schedule to allow on-going collaboration 2. Set agendas and monitor progress on deliverables 3. Monitor progress by regularly attending meetings and giving the team feedback on strengths and areas for improvement
  • 27.
    Reflections and Questions  Discuss an “aha” moment with a partner.  How will you use this to improve your school or district?  What are you wondering?

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Beginning course details and/or books/materials needed for a class/project.
  • #4 LO #!
  • #5 LO #1
  • #6 LO #!
  • #8 LO #1
  • #9 LO#1
  • #10 LO #2
  • #11 LO #1 & 3
  • #12 LO #1 and #3
  • #13 LO #1 and #3
  • #14 These are the areas emphasized on the assessment.
  • #16 UNIVERSAL DESIGNTo address the priority purposes, PARCC states are developing an assessment system comprised of four components. Each component will be computer-delivered and will leverage technology to incorporate innovations.Two summative, required assessment components designed toMake “college- and career-readiness” and “on-track” determinationsMeasure the full range of standards and full performance continuumProvide data for accountability uses, including measures of growthTwo interim, optional assessment components designed to Generate timely information for informing instruction, interventions, and professional development during the school yearIn English language arts/literacy, an additional required, non-summative component will assess students’ speaking and listening skillsTALKING POINTSGraphic depiction of the assessment system. The system includes a suite of assessments and tools that, taken together, provide a more complete picture of student mastery of standards and progress throughout the year than is currently available on state assessments.Considerations Leading to 2 optional assessments: The cost of the assessmentsFlexibility on when to administer the optional assessmentsThe amount of testing time needed to administer the assessmentsPossible disruption to school schedules caused by through-course assessment preparation and administrationConstraints the distributed design might have on the flexibility of state and local educators to sequence instruction of the CCSS and to implement their own benchmark and formative assessment initiativesThe PARCC assessment system will:Reflect the sophisticated knowledge and skills found in the English and math Common Core State StandardsInclude a mix of item types (e.g., short answer, richer multiple choice, longer open response, performance-based)Make significant use of technologyInclude testing at key points throughout the year to give teachers, parents and students better information about whether students are on track or need additional support in particular areasDiagnostic AssessmentsOne element of the reading diagnostic assessment is a text complexity tool, which will provide a diagnostic of a student’s ability to read texts independently in order to provide useful guidance to educators, parents, and students about appropriate texts for students when reading independently. These assessments will be useful for the implementation of the ELA/Literacy CCSS in the classroom, as they will help educators meet the demands of the ELA/Literacy standards to teach appropriately complex texts by helping teachers understand what “appropriately complex” really means.The diagnostic assessment in math will help educators understand the extent to which students have mastered the key ideas in mathematics ("highlighted domains") in order to pinpoint areas needing improvement or identify areas in which students are excelling. In addition, it will provide greater detail about students who are above and below grade level so teachers can individualize instructionTimeline: Expected Summer/Fall 2014HS AssessmentsTaken together, the PARCC assessment components comprise a comprehensive system of assessments that will provide timely information to teachers throughout the year, and provide students with meaningful information about their progress toward college and career readiness
  • #18 Focus LO #3
  • #27 PLC agenda examples