Small Hydropower for
Community Development
Presented by
Cecilia Ledesma
Green Initiatives Forum
28 April 2016
v No agreed upon definition, but
generally refers to hydro plants
<10MW
v The benefits of clean, reliable
electricity of traditional hydropower
v Given smaller scale avoid the
environmental and social impact of
larger hydropower schemes
v Simple technology requiring minimal
maintenance à easy to deploy to
rural, isolated communities
What is SHP?
SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL
Source: practicalaction.org/micro-hydro-power-3
v Renewable energies are expected to play an
increasingly important role in sustainable
development worldwide
v However, many examples in developing countries
of now defunct renewable energy projects
What can be done to ensure the long-term
sustainability of renewable energy projects?
v As part of the World Small Hydro
Power Development Report
(WSHPDR) ICSHP collected case
studies of successful SHP
projects around the world
v Several common themes and
lessons to be learned for
community-level projects
v Namely, community buy-in and
community engagement were
vital to project success
These are their stories.
6
SHP for PEACE in Pakistan
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province
in Pakistan marked by recent
history of natural and
manmade disasters
• 7.6 magnitude earthquake
in 2005
• Floods in 2010
• Until recently controlled by
the Taliban
Sarhad Rural Support Programme
“At the heart of the RSP approach is the
belief that marginalized communities and
disadvantaged people have within them the
capacity for self help.”
Ø The EU-funded PEACE Project (Programme for
Economic Advancement and Community
Empowerment) being implemented in the seven
districts of Malakand Division
Ø Communities organized to plan and develop their
own micro hydro projects to generate clean,
renewable and sustainable electricity
vInvolvement of different stakeholders
vCommunity Based Organizations (CBOs)
mobilized
vParticipatory system inclusive of women
vProductive Use of Renewable Energy
(PURE)
vO&M capacity building and training
The SRSP Approach
The Process
Ø Communities identify MHP as priority need
à social and technical surveys carried
out to test feasibility
Ø Message delivered at community level to
ensure broad based participation of
members
à Community Organizations formed
Ø Detailed Terms of Partnership (ToPs)
drafted and agreed upon
à project initiated
Impact to date
v 46,000 tonnes CO2 emissions reduced per
year
v Kerosene oil costs reduced from €5.2
million to €645,000 for an estimated
53,330 households
v Boost to local economic development and
585 local enterprises from access to
reliable electricity supply
v Schools: at least 13 boys and girls schools
benefiting over 1,700 children have been
connected to MHPs
v Health clinics: 7 newly-electrified Basic
Health Units now provide improved health
services to an average 325 patients per
day
v Improved standard of living – improved
living conditions and access to information
Photograph: Martin Wright/Ashden Awards
Mobilizing SHP for Climate Change
43 kW MHP Scheme at Done Stone Reservoir
Saddleworth Community Hydro Ltd.
Public screening of
“An Inconvenient Truth”
mobilized community to take action
Setting the wheels in motion
Ø Steering group formed
Ø Establishing public-private partnership
with local utilities company
Ø Attracting start-up financing
Ø Securing necessary permits and approvals
Ø Getting the project online
Cross-flow turbine system
operates year round to
generate electricity for ~77
homes via the national grid An estimated annual CO2
savings of 270 tonnes
China: SHP for
Deforestation Prevention
• Chinese government
launched the “SHP
Replacing Firewood
Environmental Protection
Project” initiative in 2003
• Subsidies implemented to
provide farmers with
cheap, clean electricity
• A key section for SHP
development and rural
electrification in the 十三五
The “SHP Replacing Firewood” pilot project has
provided 800,000 farmers with electricity and
protected 230,000 hectares of forest.
Localized policy
China’s success with SHP development
policy-driven:
• Local people participation
• Identify local potential of SHP resources
• Mobilize locally available funds
• Encourage local technology progress
• Use of local construction materials
• Local consumption prioritized
Lessons from SHP community
projects relevant for other renewable
energies
Key factors:
•The participation of the beneficiaries in
project planning and implementation
•Wide stakeholder engagement and buy-
in
•Technical capacity building at the
community level
•Financial sustainability
Lessons Learned
References
• http://www.smallhydroworld.org/
• http://practicalaction.org/page/66
• http://srsp.org.pk/srsp-main/
• http://www.ashden.org/winners/SRSP15
• https://sites.google.com/site/saddleworthcommunit
yhydro/home
Thank you !
International Center on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP)
P.O Box 202, Nanshan Rd. 136, Hangzhou, China
Tel: +86-571-87079113 Fax: +86-571-87023353
Email: cledesma@icshp.org www.icshp.org

New Renewables_Small Hydro Power

  • 1.
    Small Hydropower for CommunityDevelopment Presented by Cecilia Ledesma Green Initiatives Forum 28 April 2016
  • 2.
    v No agreedupon definition, but generally refers to hydro plants <10MW v The benefits of clean, reliable electricity of traditional hydropower v Given smaller scale avoid the environmental and social impact of larger hydropower schemes v Simple technology requiring minimal maintenance à easy to deploy to rural, isolated communities What is SHP?
  • 3.
    SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL Source:practicalaction.org/micro-hydro-power-3
  • 4.
    v Renewable energiesare expected to play an increasingly important role in sustainable development worldwide v However, many examples in developing countries of now defunct renewable energy projects What can be done to ensure the long-term sustainability of renewable energy projects?
  • 5.
    v As partof the World Small Hydro Power Development Report (WSHPDR) ICSHP collected case studies of successful SHP projects around the world v Several common themes and lessons to be learned for community-level projects v Namely, community buy-in and community engagement were vital to project success These are their stories.
  • 6.
    6 SHP for PEACEin Pakistan Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in Pakistan marked by recent history of natural and manmade disasters • 7.6 magnitude earthquake in 2005 • Floods in 2010 • Until recently controlled by the Taliban
  • 7.
    Sarhad Rural SupportProgramme “At the heart of the RSP approach is the belief that marginalized communities and disadvantaged people have within them the capacity for self help.” Ø The EU-funded PEACE Project (Programme for Economic Advancement and Community Empowerment) being implemented in the seven districts of Malakand Division Ø Communities organized to plan and develop their own micro hydro projects to generate clean, renewable and sustainable electricity
  • 8.
    vInvolvement of differentstakeholders vCommunity Based Organizations (CBOs) mobilized vParticipatory system inclusive of women vProductive Use of Renewable Energy (PURE) vO&M capacity building and training The SRSP Approach
  • 9.
    The Process Ø Communitiesidentify MHP as priority need à social and technical surveys carried out to test feasibility Ø Message delivered at community level to ensure broad based participation of members à Community Organizations formed Ø Detailed Terms of Partnership (ToPs) drafted and agreed upon à project initiated
  • 10.
    Impact to date v46,000 tonnes CO2 emissions reduced per year v Kerosene oil costs reduced from €5.2 million to €645,000 for an estimated 53,330 households v Boost to local economic development and 585 local enterprises from access to reliable electricity supply v Schools: at least 13 boys and girls schools benefiting over 1,700 children have been connected to MHPs v Health clinics: 7 newly-electrified Basic Health Units now provide improved health services to an average 325 patients per day v Improved standard of living – improved living conditions and access to information Photograph: Martin Wright/Ashden Awards
  • 11.
    Mobilizing SHP forClimate Change 43 kW MHP Scheme at Done Stone Reservoir Saddleworth Community Hydro Ltd.
  • 12.
    Public screening of “AnInconvenient Truth” mobilized community to take action
  • 13.
    Setting the wheelsin motion Ø Steering group formed Ø Establishing public-private partnership with local utilities company Ø Attracting start-up financing Ø Securing necessary permits and approvals Ø Getting the project online
  • 14.
    Cross-flow turbine system operatesyear round to generate electricity for ~77 homes via the national grid An estimated annual CO2 savings of 270 tonnes
  • 15.
    China: SHP for DeforestationPrevention • Chinese government launched the “SHP Replacing Firewood Environmental Protection Project” initiative in 2003 • Subsidies implemented to provide farmers with cheap, clean electricity • A key section for SHP development and rural electrification in the 十三五
  • 16.
    The “SHP ReplacingFirewood” pilot project has provided 800,000 farmers with electricity and protected 230,000 hectares of forest.
  • 17.
    Localized policy China’s successwith SHP development policy-driven: • Local people participation • Identify local potential of SHP resources • Mobilize locally available funds • Encourage local technology progress • Use of local construction materials • Local consumption prioritized
  • 18.
    Lessons from SHPcommunity projects relevant for other renewable energies Key factors: •The participation of the beneficiaries in project planning and implementation •Wide stakeholder engagement and buy- in •Technical capacity building at the community level •Financial sustainability Lessons Learned
  • 19.
    References • http://www.smallhydroworld.org/ • http://practicalaction.org/page/66 •http://srsp.org.pk/srsp-main/ • http://www.ashden.org/winners/SRSP15 • https://sites.google.com/site/saddleworthcommunit yhydro/home
  • 20.
    Thank you ! InternationalCenter on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP) P.O Box 202, Nanshan Rd. 136, Hangzhou, China Tel: +86-571-87079113 Fax: +86-571-87023353 Email: cledesma@icshp.org www.icshp.org