SlideShare a Scribd company logo
MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION – TRULY MAD SCENARIO
INTRODUCTION
• Mutual assured destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a
doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale
use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two or more opposing sides
would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.
• It is based on the theory of deterrence where the threat of using strong
weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons.
• The strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed,
has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.
THEORY
• The doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) assumes that each side has enough nuclear weaponry to destroy the
other side; and that either side, if attacked for any reason by the other, would retaliate without fail with equal or greater
force.
• The expected result is an immediate irreversible escalation of hostilities resulting in both combatants' mutual, total and
assured destruction.
• The doctrine further assumes that neither side will dare to launch a first strike because the other side will launch on
warning (also called fail-deadly) or with secondary forces (a second strike), resulting in unacceptable losses for both parties.
• The payoff of the MAD doctrine is expected to be a tense but stable global peace.
• The primary application of this doctrine started during the Cold War (1940s to 1991) in which MAD was seen as helping to
prevent any direct full-scale conflicts between the United States and the Soviet Union while they engaged in smaller proxy
wars around the world.
• It was also responsible for the arms race, as both nations struggled to keep nuclear parity, or at least retain second-strike
capability. Although the Cold War ended in the early 1990s, the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction continues to be
applied.
DETAILS
• When the Soviet Union achieved nuclear parity with the United States, the Cold War had entered a new
phase. The cold war became a conflict more dangerous and unmanageable than anything Americans had
faced before.
• In the old cold war Americans had enjoyed superior nuclear force, an unchallenged economy, strong
alliances, and a trusted Imperial President to direct his incredible power against the Soviets.
• In the new cold war, however, Russian forces achieved nuclear equality. Each side could destroy the other
many times.
• This fact was officially accepted in a military doctrine known as Mutual Assured Destruction, a.k.a. MAD.
Mutual Assured Destruction began to emerge at the end of the Kennedy administration.
• MAD reflects the idea that one's population could best be protected by leaving it vulnerable so long as the
other side faced comparable vulnerabilities. In short: Whoever shoots first, dies second.
MAD TO SDI
• MAD acctually acknowledged more than just nuclear parity. Both sides admitted their
vulnerability and prepared early thinking on a concept that later became known as "Star
Wars."
• As early as 1961 former secretary of defense Robert McNamara said: "If we could create an
umbrella we would need it, no matter what it costs.“
• In subsequent years, protecting strategic forces rather than the population appeared to be
the morally wrong choice.
• When MAD lost its domestic credibility, the Reagan administration promised to work
toward Mutual Assured Security (MAS) instead of relying on MAD.
REFERENCE
• http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclear-weapons/history/cold-war/strategy/strategy-
mutual-assured-destruction.htm
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction
• http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tg/image/1366/52/1366529615238.png
• http://www.minnesota-litigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/nuclear_fireball1.jpg
• http://static.flickr.com/38/103953281_de7de8289b_o.jpg
• http://images.jayisgames.com/mad.jpg
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Week 2
Week 2Week 2
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political TheoryDavid Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
Rima Doot
 
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSRThe Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
Maria Jesus Campos
 
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of power
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of powerWeek 3, montesquieu's separation of power
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of power
Sri Harini Wijayanti
 
Cold war
Cold war   Cold war
Cold war
Elif Bedir
 
M.N.Roy
M.N.RoyM.N.Roy
M.N.Roy
DrBJishamol
 
Balance of power presentation
Balance of power presentationBalance of power presentation
Balance of power presentation
bentogo
 
185096_1634995037.ppt
185096_1634995037.ppt185096_1634995037.ppt
185096_1634995037.ppt
PRAGATHESWARANGUNASE1
 
Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes Thomas Hobbes
Us hegemony in world politics
Us hegemony in world politicsUs hegemony in world politics
Us hegemony in world politics
harsh raj
 
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSDECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Ma E.C.C.
 
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold WarSec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
Weng Lun Ho
 
Balance of power by md sharif hussain
Balance of power by  md sharif hussainBalance of power by  md sharif hussain
Balance of power by md sharif hussain
MDSharifHussain
 
Topic 11 - Machiavelli
Topic 11 - MachiavelliTopic 11 - Machiavelli
Topic 11 - Machiavelli
Fatin Nazihah Aziz
 
Dollar Diplomacy
Dollar DiplomacyDollar Diplomacy
Dollar Diplomacy
Kevin A
 
Cold War - Why did detente take place?
Cold War - Why did detente take place?Cold War - Why did detente take place?
Cold War - Why did detente take place?
mrmarr
 
Federalist #10
Federalist #10Federalist #10
Federalist #10
Stephen Hilger
 
nuclear proliferation (1).pptx
nuclear proliferation (1).pptxnuclear proliferation (1).pptx
nuclear proliferation (1).pptx
RobertKhan12
 
6. detente
6. detente6. detente
Theories of Sovereignty
Theories of SovereigntyTheories of Sovereignty
Theories of Sovereignty
A K DAS's | Law
 

What's hot (20)

Week 2
Week 2Week 2
Week 2
 
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political TheoryDavid Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political Theory
 
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSRThe Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
The Bolshevik Revolution and the USSR
 
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of power
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of powerWeek 3, montesquieu's separation of power
Week 3, montesquieu's separation of power
 
Cold war
Cold war   Cold war
Cold war
 
M.N.Roy
M.N.RoyM.N.Roy
M.N.Roy
 
Balance of power presentation
Balance of power presentationBalance of power presentation
Balance of power presentation
 
185096_1634995037.ppt
185096_1634995037.ppt185096_1634995037.ppt
185096_1634995037.ppt
 
Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes
 
Us hegemony in world politics
Us hegemony in world politicsUs hegemony in world politics
Us hegemony in world politics
 
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSDECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DECISION MAKING MODEL. IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
 
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold WarSec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
Sec 5N Hist (Elec) Chapter 11: End of Cold War
 
Balance of power by md sharif hussain
Balance of power by  md sharif hussainBalance of power by  md sharif hussain
Balance of power by md sharif hussain
 
Topic 11 - Machiavelli
Topic 11 - MachiavelliTopic 11 - Machiavelli
Topic 11 - Machiavelli
 
Dollar Diplomacy
Dollar DiplomacyDollar Diplomacy
Dollar Diplomacy
 
Cold War - Why did detente take place?
Cold War - Why did detente take place?Cold War - Why did detente take place?
Cold War - Why did detente take place?
 
Federalist #10
Federalist #10Federalist #10
Federalist #10
 
nuclear proliferation (1).pptx
nuclear proliferation (1).pptxnuclear proliferation (1).pptx
nuclear proliferation (1).pptx
 
6. detente
6. detente6. detente
6. detente
 
Theories of Sovereignty
Theories of SovereigntyTheories of Sovereignty
Theories of Sovereignty
 

Similar to New microsoft power point presentation (25)

The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docxThe Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
oreo10
 
Nuclear proliferation
Nuclear proliferationNuclear proliferation
Nuclear proliferation
Mustafizur Rahman
 
Evolution of strategic doctrines
Evolution of strategic doctrinesEvolution of strategic doctrines
Evolution of strategic doctrines
Venkata Krishnan Sankaranarayanan
 
Nuclear Deterrence.pptx
Nuclear Deterrence.pptxNuclear Deterrence.pptx
Nuclear Deterrence.pptx
HaseebUllah303228
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
Delhi University
 
Nuclear weapons & influence
Nuclear weapons & influenceNuclear weapons & influence
Nuclear weapons & influence
kbenoy
 
Technology and changing nature of warfare
Technology and changing nature of warfareTechnology and changing nature of warfare
Technology and changing nature of warfare
andeedalal
 
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICYUNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
SanskritiRazdan
 
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
David Suchanek
 
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
runningman825
 
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
runningman825
 
Security and Disarmament
Security and DisarmamentSecurity and Disarmament
Security and Disarmament
Matt Mackowiak
 
DETERRENCE .pdf
DETERRENCE .pdfDETERRENCE .pdf
DETERRENCE .pdf
FackFack2
 
World war 3
World war 3World war 3
World war 3
MRH Neelove
 
Nuclear arms race by tasya
Nuclear arms race by tasyaNuclear arms race by tasya
Nuclear arms race by tasya
gsadsocialstudies
 
Bush doctrine by @JWongi
Bush doctrine by @JWongiBush doctrine by @JWongi
Bush doctrine by @JWongi
himchanjung
 
The Threat of Nuclear Weapons
The Threat of Nuclear WeaponsThe Threat of Nuclear Weapons
The Threat of Nuclear Weapons
The Heritage Foundation
 
The Cold War Expands
The Cold War ExpandsThe Cold War Expands
The Cold War Expands
mrsbreedsclass
 
Unit 5 lesson 3 the cold war expands
Unit 5 lesson 3  the cold war expandsUnit 5 lesson 3  the cold war expands
Unit 5 lesson 3 the cold war expands
MrsSmithGHS
 
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdf
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdfGeopolitics - Part 2.pdf
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdf
NellyELHassani
 

Similar to New microsoft power point presentation (25) (20)

The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docxThe Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
The Kennedy Doctrine of Flexible Response Flexible Response.docx
 
Nuclear proliferation
Nuclear proliferationNuclear proliferation
Nuclear proliferation
 
Evolution of strategic doctrines
Evolution of strategic doctrinesEvolution of strategic doctrines
Evolution of strategic doctrines
 
Nuclear Deterrence.pptx
Nuclear Deterrence.pptxNuclear Deterrence.pptx
Nuclear Deterrence.pptx
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Nuclear weapons & influence
Nuclear weapons & influenceNuclear weapons & influence
Nuclear weapons & influence
 
Technology and changing nature of warfare
Technology and changing nature of warfareTechnology and changing nature of warfare
Technology and changing nature of warfare
 
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICYUNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
UNIT 8-EISENHOWER AND HIS FOREIGN POLICY
 
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
CHC2D Canadian HistoryCh. 11.1
 
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
 
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13   Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter   Doher...
Lessons 3,8,9,10,12,13 Terrorism, Fp, Policy, Strategy, Stagesetter Doher...
 
Security and Disarmament
Security and DisarmamentSecurity and Disarmament
Security and Disarmament
 
DETERRENCE .pdf
DETERRENCE .pdfDETERRENCE .pdf
DETERRENCE .pdf
 
World war 3
World war 3World war 3
World war 3
 
Nuclear arms race by tasya
Nuclear arms race by tasyaNuclear arms race by tasya
Nuclear arms race by tasya
 
Bush doctrine by @JWongi
Bush doctrine by @JWongiBush doctrine by @JWongi
Bush doctrine by @JWongi
 
The Threat of Nuclear Weapons
The Threat of Nuclear WeaponsThe Threat of Nuclear Weapons
The Threat of Nuclear Weapons
 
The Cold War Expands
The Cold War ExpandsThe Cold War Expands
The Cold War Expands
 
Unit 5 lesson 3 the cold war expands
Unit 5 lesson 3  the cold war expandsUnit 5 lesson 3  the cold war expands
Unit 5 lesson 3 the cold war expands
 
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdf
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdfGeopolitics - Part 2.pdf
Geopolitics - Part 2.pdf
 

More from hindujudaic

Zulfiquar Class Frigates
Zulfiquar Class FrigatesZulfiquar Class Frigates
Zulfiquar Class Frigates
hindujudaic
 
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured VehicleXA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
hindujudaic
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
hindujudaic
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part ivMilitary Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
hindujudaic
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
hindujudaic
 
Worst military decisions ever made – part ii
Worst military decisions ever made – part iiWorst military decisions ever made – part ii
Worst military decisions ever made – part ii
hindujudaic
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
hindujudaic
 
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
hindujudaic
 
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
hindujudaic
 
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech RepublicVega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
hindujudaic
 
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Centuryuxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
hindujudaic
 
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's EnemiesUnit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
hindujudaic
 
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting NastyTsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
hindujudaic
 
Top ten Diamond Producing Countries
Top ten Diamond Producing CountriesTop ten Diamond Producing Countries
Top ten Diamond Producing Countries
hindujudaic
 
Top ten Coal Producing Countries
Top ten Coal Producing CountriesTop ten Coal Producing Countries
Top ten Coal Producing Countries
hindujudaic
 
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-reviewThe Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
hindujudaic
 
The top ten most expensive watches in the world
The top ten most expensive watches in the worldThe top ten most expensive watches in the world
The top ten most expensive watches in the world
hindujudaic
 
Top Ten Richest Terror Networks
Top Ten Richest Terror NetworksTop Ten Richest Terror Networks
Top Ten Richest Terror Networks
hindujudaic
 
History of Telephone
History of TelephoneHistory of Telephone
History of Telephone
hindujudaic
 
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed ForcesTatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
hindujudaic
 

More from hindujudaic (20)

Zulfiquar Class Frigates
Zulfiquar Class FrigatesZulfiquar Class Frigates
Zulfiquar Class Frigates
 
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured VehicleXA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
XA-200, Finland - Wheeled Armoured Vehicle
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 5)
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part ivMilitary Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
Military Decisions Gone WRONG - Part iv
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 3)
 
Worst military decisions ever made – part ii
Worst military decisions ever made – part iiWorst military decisions ever made – part ii
Worst military decisions ever made – part ii
 
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
Military Decisions Gone WRONG (Part 1)
 
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 2)
 
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
Mysteries of Wars (Part 1)
 
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech RepublicVega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
Vega 4x4 Multi Purpose Armoured Vehicle, Czech Republic
 
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Centuryuxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
uxv Combatant, UK - Royal Navy's Warship Concept of 21st Century
 
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's EnemiesUnit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
Unit 101, Israel - Bane of Israel's Enemies
 
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting NastyTsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
Tsunami Bomb - Weapons Getting Nasty
 
Top ten Diamond Producing Countries
Top ten Diamond Producing CountriesTop ten Diamond Producing Countries
Top ten Diamond Producing Countries
 
Top ten Coal Producing Countries
Top ten Coal Producing CountriesTop ten Coal Producing Countries
Top ten Coal Producing Countries
 
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-reviewThe Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
The Israeli-palestinian-conflict-historical-review
 
The top ten most expensive watches in the world
The top ten most expensive watches in the worldThe top ten most expensive watches in the world
The top ten most expensive watches in the world
 
Top Ten Richest Terror Networks
Top Ten Richest Terror NetworksTop Ten Richest Terror Networks
Top Ten Richest Terror Networks
 
History of Telephone
History of TelephoneHistory of Telephone
History of Telephone
 
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed ForcesTatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
Tatra, India - All Terrain Vehicles for Indian Armed Forces
 

New microsoft power point presentation (25)

  • 1. MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION – TRULY MAD SCENARIO
  • 2. INTRODUCTION • Mutual assured destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. • It is based on the theory of deterrence where the threat of using strong weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons. • The strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.
  • 3.
  • 4. THEORY • The doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) assumes that each side has enough nuclear weaponry to destroy the other side; and that either side, if attacked for any reason by the other, would retaliate without fail with equal or greater force. • The expected result is an immediate irreversible escalation of hostilities resulting in both combatants' mutual, total and assured destruction. • The doctrine further assumes that neither side will dare to launch a first strike because the other side will launch on warning (also called fail-deadly) or with secondary forces (a second strike), resulting in unacceptable losses for both parties. • The payoff of the MAD doctrine is expected to be a tense but stable global peace. • The primary application of this doctrine started during the Cold War (1940s to 1991) in which MAD was seen as helping to prevent any direct full-scale conflicts between the United States and the Soviet Union while they engaged in smaller proxy wars around the world. • It was also responsible for the arms race, as both nations struggled to keep nuclear parity, or at least retain second-strike capability. Although the Cold War ended in the early 1990s, the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction continues to be applied.
  • 5.
  • 6. DETAILS • When the Soviet Union achieved nuclear parity with the United States, the Cold War had entered a new phase. The cold war became a conflict more dangerous and unmanageable than anything Americans had faced before. • In the old cold war Americans had enjoyed superior nuclear force, an unchallenged economy, strong alliances, and a trusted Imperial President to direct his incredible power against the Soviets. • In the new cold war, however, Russian forces achieved nuclear equality. Each side could destroy the other many times. • This fact was officially accepted in a military doctrine known as Mutual Assured Destruction, a.k.a. MAD. Mutual Assured Destruction began to emerge at the end of the Kennedy administration. • MAD reflects the idea that one's population could best be protected by leaving it vulnerable so long as the other side faced comparable vulnerabilities. In short: Whoever shoots first, dies second.
  • 7.
  • 8. MAD TO SDI • MAD acctually acknowledged more than just nuclear parity. Both sides admitted their vulnerability and prepared early thinking on a concept that later became known as "Star Wars." • As early as 1961 former secretary of defense Robert McNamara said: "If we could create an umbrella we would need it, no matter what it costs.“ • In subsequent years, protecting strategic forces rather than the population appeared to be the morally wrong choice. • When MAD lost its domestic credibility, the Reagan administration promised to work toward Mutual Assured Security (MAS) instead of relying on MAD.
  • 9.
  • 10. REFERENCE • http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclear-weapons/history/cold-war/strategy/strategy- mutual-assured-destruction.htm • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction • http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tg/image/1366/52/1366529615238.png • http://www.minnesota-litigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/nuclear_fireball1.jpg • http://static.flickr.com/38/103953281_de7de8289b_o.jpg • http://images.jayisgames.com/mad.jpg