In this section, we see how New Energy science helps us move toward a workable Unified Field Theory; how it helps us to understand Zero Point Energy as the mysterious "dark energy" cosmologists have long posited; and how the Big Bang most likely never happened.

1. New Energy for an Ultra-modern Vietnam
Part 3: The Science
Section C: Implications
June 2014 Saigon New Energy Group

2. To discuss this presentation and pose
any questions you may have, please
visit our website,
www.nangluongmoisaigon.org

3. Talking about the formation of galaxies
and solar systems is a good way to
move to our next topic, which is how
New Energy science helps us to re-
think our cosmology.

4. There are at least four aspects of
cosmology which New Energy science
allows us to reformulate. These are:
• Dark energy
• Unified Field Theory
• Expansion of the universe after the “Big Bang”
• Redshift of light from distant galaxies and stars

5. First, let’s talk about Dark Energy.
• “Dark Energy” has
been postulated by
cosmologists who
believe that gravity
is the fundamental
force that
determines the
interactions of
galaxies and stars.

6. They probably are so wedded to the idea that
gravity controls these interactions due to the
fact that we can indeed see gravity controlling
the Moon’s orbit around the Earth and the
Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

7. They made a big leap of faith by
postulating that therefore, gravity
must also control intergalactic and
interstellar interactions

8. But remember the distinction we
made earlier – that
“Gravitation plays the dominant role for internal
interactions, while electromagnetism plays the
dominant role for external interactions among
unbounded systems.”

9. Because most cosmologists are failing
to see the plasma-like interactions of
galaxies and stars, they run into many
difficulties trying to explain the
universe using gravity.
For example:

10. Problems with the Gravitational Model
for Celestial Mechanics
• Gravity can’t
explain how
galaxies formed
in the first place

11. Problems with the Gravitational Model
for Celestial Mechanics
• Gravity can’t explain how or why the first stars
formed

12. Problems with the Gravitational Model
for Celestial Mechanics
• Gravity can’t explain why the outer sections of
the arms of a spiral galaxy spin around the
center as fast as the inner sections of the
spiral arms do.

13. Problems with the Gravitational Model
for Celestial Mechanics
• The Gravitational Model predicts big
variations in cosmic background radiation and
the density of matter in the Universe… but
observations have shown them to be quite
uniform

14. In order to fill in the holes in their
theory, these gravity-obsessed
cosmologists have invented new terms
in their equations for “Dark Energy,”
“Dark Matter,” etc. to make their
equations “work”

15. And yet, no scientist and no scientific
instrument has ever seen this “Dark
Energy” or “Dark Matter”

16. Orthodox cosmologists try to explain
the problem away by defining these
things as inherently imperceivable

17. But this just makes Dark Energy and Dark
Matter sound more and more like “fudge
factors” invented by confused scientists

18. Now, scientists are beginning to think that ZPE can
take the place of the postulated “Dark Energy”

19. There are many important
consequences for cosmology if this is
the case

20. For one, it would mean that there was
no “Big Bang”

21. Instead, the physical Universe that we
observe simply “bubbled up” from the
transmuting ether

22. And the Universe formed – indeed,
continues to be formed – largely by
the principles of plasma physics

23. Which, as we have seen, are a key part
of New Energy research

24. Yes, this process of bubbling up from the
transmuting ether in our Physical Universe
could still have had a beginning, but it may
not have been explosive

25. Second, these principles of plasma
physics – in which gravity plays only a
minor role, whereas electricity and
magnetism play a greater role – work
the same at the level of the hydrogen
atom as well as the level of two
colliding galaxies

26. This allows us to move toward a
reconciliation of General Relativity with
Quantum Electrodynamics, i.e. a Unified
Field Theory

27. Third, it would mean that the Universe
is not expanding in the way that
conventional cosmology explains

28. Expansion of the Universe was considered
“necessary” due to mainstream belief in
the Big Bang Theory

29. The conventional “Big Bang” view
holds that very distant superclusters of
galaxies are moving at near-light
speeds
… and other things that seem rather
implausible

30. The conventional view cites the increasing
red-shift of light observed in very distant
stars and galaxies as evidence of the
expansion of the Universe

31. However, New Energy science suggests
that this red-shifting of light results
from the fact that as photons travel
through millions or billions of light-
years of space, they have a tendency
to lose energy and drop back into the
transmuting ether

32. Remember that as these photons fly
through the vacuum of space, that vacuum
is not as empty as it initially appears

33. Instead, it is full of virtual particles.

34. And each time a photon hits a virtual
particle, its energy is ever so slightly
dissipated

35. Imagine you had to run a distance of
>10 billion light years

36. Wouldn’t you get tired too?

37. We call this the “tired light hypothesis”
• It was made famous by
Walther von Nernst in
1921

38. The tired light hypothesis didn’t attract
many supporters in the twentieth
century because people were mostly
unaware of the existence of those
virtual particles which impeded a
photon’s journey through space

39. However, now an increasing number of
scientists, including Don Hotson and Paul
LaViolette, are supporting a more well-
informed version of the tired-light theory

40. If the tired light
theory is correct,
then it would
explain why the
light from distant
stars and galaxies
is red-shifted

41. In other words, the Doppler effect would
not be responsible for red-shifting

42. And we could discard Hubble’s theory
of the expanding universe

43. The consequence of this is hard to
overstate:
There never was a Big Bang

44. Yes, my friends, we can finally retire
that old, worn-out theory, which has
been patched up more times than a
20-year-old pair of blue jeans

45. Doesn’t it feel nice to get a new set of
clothes?

46. So now we’ve seen how acknowledging the
existence and role of ZPE in the Multiverse
allows us to revise our cosmology
• Zero Point Energy is the “Dark Energy”
• No more Big Bang Theory
• Tired light explains red-shifting of light
• We can finally unify Quantum Electrodynamics
and General Relativity