The National Education Policy 2009 was announced to replace the 1998-2010 policy, as the previous policy did not achieve desired results. The 2009 policy aimed to address two gaps - commitment and implementation. It focused on improving teacher quality, curriculum, literacy rates, equity and financing for education. The policy set targets like universal primary education by 2015, secondary by 2025, and increasing literacy to 86% by 2015. However, critics argue the targets are unrealistic without adequate poverty reduction plans. The policy's success depends on proper implementation of its aims to develop education.

1. National Educational Policy 2009
Submitted to : Dr. Muhammad Amin
Submitted by : Sahar Fatima
M.phill ELPS

2. Introduction
• Before the expiration of National Education Policy (NEP)
for the period of 1998 to 2010, the government
announced the new National Education Policy (NEP) for
the next decade in 2009, called the "National Education
Policy (2009)".As the Education Policy (1998 - 2010) was
not producing the desired results, the review process for
the National Education Policy 1998-2010 was initiated in
2005 and the White Paper was finalised in March 2007.
The White Paper became the basis for development of
the new Education Policy.

3. Reason behind NEP 2009:
There are two main reason that promted Ministry of
education to launch a policy before time horizon of NEP
1998-2010
1.The previous policy was not producing desied result and
performance remained defecient in several aspects like
quality and equity in getting education
2.The second reason behind the policy is international
challenges like Millennium development goals (MDG’s) and
education for all (EFA).

4. CHALLENGES
• Poor Quality of Teachers & Managers
• Quality of curriculum, textbooks & exams
• Low level of literacy
• Out of school children
• Dropouts
• Public Private Partnership
• In-adequate financing
• Gender Equity
• Poor monitoring & evaluation
• Imbalance in primary, middle & secondary schools
• Inconvenient school location

5. Focus of NEP 2009
This policy identifies the two fundamental causes that lie
behind defeciencies in educational performance.
1.Commitment Gap
2.Implementation Gap
So, the policy focus on filling these gaps

6. Sailient feature of educational policy 2009
• Unformity in education system
• Globalization
• Social cohesion
• Bridging public private gap
• Overcoming structural divides
• Management and planning capacity
• Involvement of communities
• Islamic education
• Early Childhood education
• Elemantary education

7. • Secondary and higher education
• Literacy and formal education
• Emergency education
• Improving quality education
• Universal and Free Primary( upto 2015) and Secondary
Education (by 2025)
• The Literacy rate will be enhanced to 86% by 2015
• promotion of Equity
• Relevance to Labour Market
• Financial allocation of 7% of GDP by 2015
• Encourage Private sector

8. •Career Counselling at higher secondary level
•Enhance qualifications for employment as teachers
•Pre-service & in-service teacher training
•Accreditation and certification of teachers
•Merit based teacher recruitment, professional development,
promotions & postings
•Curriculum development
•Competitive publishing of textbooks and learning materials

9. • Achieve the MDG goals.
• All Primary schools shall be upgraded to Middle level
• Well developed plan for expanding school facilities.
• High priority to reducing drop out rates
• Improved school environment
• Deeni Madarass
• Improved Examination System
• Medium of Instruction

10. Criticism
• The government has set a target in its education policy to bring all children from 6 to
10 years in elementary schools by 2015 and to increase the literacy rate to 85% by
2015,The government has set the target but no plan has been made to encourage the
children as well as adults to take admission in the schools. The targets are unrealistic.
Because due to rising inflation the cost of living is increasing day by day and most of
the population is living by hand to mouth. The poverty is increasing at a rapid rate
therefore, the number of children going to school is decreasing, and the government
cannot achieve this target unless the poverty is reduced to minimum. In the policy the
government has not been able to justify that how it is going to achieve this
target.Therefore, the target set is not properly planed and it seems that government has
set the target without proper survey, research and planning.

11. Conclusion
The government has made a good education policy, and the
aims and objectives of the government are at increasing the
literacy rate of the country and development of education
sector within five years. The government has made targets
and defined the policy to be implemented. The policy
designed is good and will only be successful if there are
implemented as is desired.