Moon Rover Project

22/04/2013
Lunar Rover Design Project |
DM401
APPALING 13 – DRIVE TEAM – INTEGRATED
MECHATRONIC DESIGN PROJECT – LUNAR
ROVER
Alexander Clayton
Catriona Provan
Elaine Macqueen
Kerrie Noble
Simon Walls

Integrated Mechatronic Lunar Rover Design Project
Appalling 13 – Drive Team Sub-Group Integrated Mechatronic Design
Project Report 19/04/2013
2
Appalling 13 – Lunar rover Drive System Sub-Group
Abstract
This report details the design process undertaken by the drive team sub-group element of the
Appalling 13 mechatronic design project team.
This report will guide you through the market research conducted by the team, including discussion
on previous missions and the technology they incorporated, how this has left a legacy within space
flight and mission to the lunar surface, and also subsequently mars. This market research then leads
to the discussion of requirements which must be met by this design in order for it to be sanctions fit
for a lunar mission. The requirements cover an extensive range of areas including design for the
moon, standards and references, fasteners, bearings, lubricants, motors, power systems and other
general considerations. These outlined requirements, combined with the team’s Product Design
Specification will help to outline the design constraints and user requirements within this design
project.
The project will then enter discussions and exploration of the concept development of the lunar
rover design. This includes exploration through a function means tree and concept drawings of
initial ideas. Following this a detailed section will discuss the selected components required for this
design, including the Maxon RE30 motor and the radioisotope power system. A visual exploration of
the design, of both a theoretical physical model and a realistic CAD model will further detail the
chosen design.

3
Contents
Appalling 13 – Lunar rover Drive System Sub-Group ....................................................................1
Abstract...............................................................................................................................................2
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................5
2. Market Research.........................................................................................................................5
2.1 Existing Products.......................................................................................................................6
2.2 Technology Research ..............................................................................................................11
3. Requirements............................................................................................................................15
3.1 Design for the moon ...............................................................................................................15
Issues for Lunar Machinery...........................................................................................................16
3.2 Standards and References ......................................................................................................16
3.3 Fasteners.................................................................................................................................17
3.4 Bearings...................................................................................................................................17
3.5 Lubricants................................................................................................................................18
3.6 Motors.....................................................................................................................................18
3.7 Power System Components – Solar Arrays.............................................................................18
3.8 Power System Components – Batteries..................................................................................19
3.9 General Considerations...........................................................................................................19
3.10 Product Design Specification ................................................................................................19
4. Function Means Tree ............................................................................................................24
5. Concept Generation..................................................................................................................24
6. Selection of Components For Chosen Design...............................................................................27
6.1 Moon Rover Wheel Motors and Gearing................................................................................27
6.2 Rocker Bogie Suspension ........................................................................................................30
6.3 Power Requirements for the Mission.....................................................................................30
6.4 Power Source ..........................................................................................................................31
6.5 Materials .................................................................................................................................36
Aluminium.....................................................................................................................................36
High Strength Plastics ...................................................................................................................36
Carbon Fibre..................................................................................................................................37
Composite Materials.....................................................................................................................37
Chosen Material............................................................................................................................37
6.6 Joining methods......................................................................................................................37
6.7 Shape.......................................................................................................................................37

4
6.8 Fasteners.................................................................................................................................38
7. Calculations...............................................................................................................................38
7.1 Static Calculations...................................................................................................................38
7.2 Power Requirements for Planned Mission .............................................................................40
7.3 Power Transmission Calculation .............................................................................................41
8. Prototyping ...............................................................................................................................42
8.1 The Theoretical Prototype ................................................................................................42
8.2 The Realistic Prototype...........................................................................................................45
9. Project Management ................................................................................................................50
10. Conclusion.............................................................................................................................54
More Flexibility .............................................................................................................................55
Minimise Energy Usage.................................................................................................................55
Navigate Difficult Terrain..............................................................................................................55
References ........................................................................................................................................56

5
1. Introduction
Moon exploration is still not considered a thing of the past. Future exploration missions to the moon
will look at creating global maps of unprecedented quality, captured by at least four robotic missions
which will orbit the moon. These exploration missions to the moon, and its mysterious surfaces,
especially those situated around the Polar Regions, will require soft landings in order to map the
surface, examine the volatile deposits and characterise the unusual environment which exists there.
Other plans for moon exploration also include plans to return humans to the moon, however this
time it will not be to prove what man-kind can do, as in the Apollo mission in 1969, but instead it will
ultimately explore how the moon could be used to support a new and growing spacefaring
capability. Whilst on the moon the main aims will be to learn the skills and develop the technologies
which are needed to live and work on another world.
This report outlines the steps taken to design a more advanced moon rover to help with future
exploration missions to the moon. The project has taken inspiration from previous moon rover
designs, however these past designs are still very basic and there are various highlighted instances
where improvements could be made. Such areas for improvements are; designing so that the moon
rover has a more flexible ability to navigate around different terrains, to design to minimise energy
usage to enable a maximum distance to be covered during the mission, and finally to design in the
ability for the moon rover to negotiate terrain surfaces with different terrain surface quality and
hardness. The decision taken within this project was to concentrate on these main areas and use
the advancement in technology within these areas to help design a moon rover with substantial
capabilities in these three areas. It is hoped that with this design consideration a more advanced,
modular moon rover design with more efficient drive systems can be achieved.
The main outcomes from this initial project brief are detailed below with evidence of further
research and development throughout the design process. The design process used throughout this
project was the standard Pugh process. This allowed for quick and wide-ranging development of
ideas while also leading to detailed technical development in a minimised period of time.
2. Market Research
In order to develop a greater understanding of existing products within the space market, a market
research portfolio was produced, detailing some current and past moon rover designs which have
been developed by NASA. The information gathered from this process concentrates heavily on the
dimensions and aspects of the drive systems of all existing products covered. The outcomes from
this research portfolio are shown below.

6
2.1 Existing Products
Sojourner Micro Rover
The Sojourner Micro Rover was one of the first Mars
exploration rovers operating in the late 1990’s for a
duration of 83 earth days. It operated using a non-
rechargeable battery and a solar panel in order for the
rover to operate through the day. The design is
comprised of 6 wheels, each of diameter 130mm. In this
design each wheel is independently actuated resulting in
high torque to allow for inclines and variances within the
rough terrain. Due to the high torque being incorporated
within the design the Sojourner Micro Rover can only
achieve a top speed of 0.4m/min. This may seem like a
slow speed, however when considered within the
context of this project a slow speed with high torque seems necessary in order for the moon rover to
have the ability to negotiate terrain surfaces with different terrain quality and hardness. At this
stage of the project the team have therefore identified that the final calculations for the design of
the more technically advanced moon rover should illustrate an achievable high speed which is slow
in comparison to some other moon rover designs and it should also incorporate a high toque system.
(NASA, 1996)
Spirit Rover
The Spirit Rover is another NASA designed Mars
Rover. Originally designed for a 90 day mission, the
Spirit Rover operated for more than 6 years due to
environmental events resulting in activity between
the years of 2004-10. In terms of the power
requirements within this design, the rover used solar
arrays and rechargeable batteries which in turn
allowed for 4 hours of activity during one Martian day.
This energy could be stored for use at night. With 6
independently motorised wheels the rover could
achieve a maximum speed of 3m/min and stability on
tilts of up to 30 degrees. Within the context of the
moon rover design for this project, it is important to note what may be important power
requirements which have been illustrated through this rover design. For this design project the
team have highlighted that it will be necessary to consider the storing of energy for use at night
throughout the missions. (NASA, unknown date)
Figure 1 – The Sojourner Rover
Figure 2 – The Spirit Rover

7
ATHLETE Rover
The ATHLETE (All-Terrain Hex-legged Extra-Terrestrial Explorer) is a system which is currently under
development for use on lunar rovers. Its 6 legs offer the design the ability for movement with 6
degrees of freedom and the design of these legs allow the rover to both roll and walk over difficult
terrains. With a leg reach in the region of 6 meters this allows the rover to operate on slopes of 35
degrees, this is a larger slope than conventional rocker-bogie drive systems can obtain. (NASA,
2008) In the context of the moon rover design project, this existing design again highlights the
importance of flexible travel and the part this plays in how the rover will be able to negotiate the
different terrains which it may face. As this is an on-going development the team feel that this
design is important as some of the included hardware in this
design is more technically advanced that what has been
expressed previously through the research shown on the other
rover designs from NASA missions. In this case the team feel
that a lot of lessons can be learnt from this development and
therefore refining and further development of these ideas
within the design project could prove to be very beneficial.
Curiosity Rover
The latest in mars rovers, the Curiosity rover, landed on the
Martian surface in august 2012 to begin a two year mission,
although this has been extended indefinitely due mainly to its
platonium-238 core. This allows for thermoelectric energy
generation, meaning the rover can operate day and night
during any season for a minimal duration of 14 years. The heat
energy generated from the decay of the isotope is the converted to electrical energy which then
recharges two lithium-ion batteries. The rover uses a rocker-bogie suspension system equipped with
6 independently actuated and geared wheels of diameter 500mm. The vehicle can withstand tilts of
up to 50 degrees however on-board sensors limit this angle to 30 degrees. (NASA, 2012) In terms of
Figure 3 – The Athlete Rover
Figure 4 – The Curiosity Rover

8
flexibility in movement, efficient power source generation and the rover’s ability to traverse very
rough and difficult terrain, this deign proves to be a good benchmark for the design of the moon
rover within the context of this project. Any design generated by this project will be ultimately
assessed against the abilities of this rover as this is currently the most advanced design which NASA
have used on any mission. (NASA, 2010)
The Successful Legacy of the Lunar Rover
The Apollo Project has left a very important legacy in terms of missions to the lunar surface. The
first legacy, which is less significant within the context of this project, was the successful
accomplishments, politically, for which the Apollo project had first been created.
The second legacy left by the Apollo project was the triumph in managing and meeting difficult
engineering and technologically integrated requirements. The Apollo project proved that although
the technological challenge posed by the mission was sophisticated and impressive, the result which
was being targeted was very much in the grasp of the lunar rover and NASA. However, to achieve
this, the access to required resources was a necessity. This legacy can provide some necessary
insight for this design project. Although the requirements posed by this design project are
sophisticated, a successful outcome is within grasp.
The final legacy left by the Apollo programme was the way in which the program forced every
person of the World to look at planet Earth in a different way. As the newly designed moon rover
emerging from this project has the potential to complete future exploration missions to the lunar
surface, this is also an important legacy to consider. (NASA, 1999) (Beale, D., unknown year)
Figure 5 – The lunar rover in space

9
Frame details from the first Apollo Programme
mission show that the frame was constructed
from Aluminium 2219 welded tube. The frame
was a fully foldable frame and this is illustrated
in the original design diagram shown to the left.
(Kurt, 2004)
Drive Details
The drive details for the first lunar rover are
listed below;
• Four, ¼ horsepower, electric motors
were located at each wheel, meaning each
wheel had an individual drive system
• Top achievable speeds of up to 17 km/h
could be achieved (Baker, D., 1971) (Kudish, H., 1970)
• The motors were geared in order to reduce the
speed of the motor. The gearing ratio was 80:1
with a harmonic drive gearing. This reduced the
overall speed that each of the wheels within the
design would be travelling, allowing for more
considered movement of the buggy, especially
beneficial when moving over difficult terrain. (Gear
Product, 2006)
• The motors and harmonic drive were hermetically
sealed and pressurized to 7.5 psia (pounds per
square inch absolute) to protect from lunar dust and
for improved brush lubrication.
• Braking was both electodynamic by the motors and
from brake shoes forced against a drum through a linkage and cable. (Kudish, H., 1970)
It is essential to remember that at the time this rover was at the top of technological development.
However with growing development, much of the technology used within this design has now been
out-dated by further progression in this area. Although this highlights a simple design solution, in
the context of this design project, it is essential that this simplicity is kept but integrated with more
developed technological concepts. (Beale, D., unknown year)
Figure 5 – The frame design of the
first lunar rover in space

10
Other Rover Details
Other details concerning the construction and drive system of the first Apollo Lunar Rover have been
listed below;
• The suspension was a double wishbone suspension system, each wishbone feature was
attached to a torsion bar and a damper was placed between the chassis and upper
wishbone.
• The wheels consisted of an aluminium hub, a tire made of zinc coated woven piano wires
and titanium chevron treads attached to the rim and discs of formed aluminium. Dust
guards were mounted about each wheel
• Front and rear wheel steer was accomplished by an Ackermann-geometry steering linkage
system, driven by an electric motor servo-system that amplifies the left and right joystick
motion from the astronaut.
• In order to protect the LRV against the thermal environment of the moon several different
thermal control systems were incorporated into the LRV design. These systems consisted of
MLI blankets (Multi-layer insulation) covered by Beta Cloth, space radiators, mass heat sinks,
special surface coatings and finishes, and thermal straps.
• One of the main problems that the LRV encountered was an issue concerning lunar dust
lying on the surface of the moon. Degradation of thermal and electronic components was a
problem as well as the wear and tear of components and other surfaces from the abrasive
lunar dust. (Beale, D., unknown year)
At the end of the market research section it became apparent that there are many different types
and designs of rover which have been designed and manufactured by NASA. The main difference
between each of these designs is the technicality of the design, the ability with which the
technological aspect provides the rover and the differing configurations which produce different
results in certain circumstances. As it became apparent that technological aspects of the design
were some of the main issues and features the team moved into the technological review process.
Figure 8 – The wheel design of the

11
2.2 Technology Research
The main technological areas, mainly identified from the previously conducted research, which were
highlighted by the team as areas which would be the key focus areas for this design project, were
the drive system requirements and the use of a Rocker Bogie suspension system. The team felt that
by combining these two elements the most satisfactory outcome, in terms of flexibility and the
ability to move over differing terrains would be achieved through the use of this type of design.
Drive Mechanisms
Research has shown that many common drive mechanisms for rover design include the following
capabilities;
• 4, 6 and 8 wheel drive systems are commonly used to help provide stability within the
design, especially where traversing over inclined terrain is a possibility.
• Walking and rolling drive systems have been tested in locations such as Mount Spurr Alaska
or on active volcanoes to prove terrain navigation concept and ability.
• All battery operations (normally lithium battery) are now controlled with recharge systems
such as solar radiation.
• Engineers are in the early development stage of skid steer. This is a drive system where
wheels on either side are synchronised allowing each side of the frame to move
independently. This provides a 0 degrees pirouette capability within the rover design
resulting in good movement control however this often results in the rover tearing up the
surface of the ground on which it is moving. This type of system does not involve the use of
a rigid frame in order to provide better balance capabilities within the rover. This is shown
through the Ratler design example.
• Over the past decade development of the rocker bogie suspension system, which is now
used in Mars exploration, has been rapid. This design is regarded as the best design for
vehicle stability and obstacle climbing capability. (NASA, 2003)
Figure 9 – Initial development of the
mars exploration rover

12
Due to the apparent benefits of using a Rocker Bogie suspension system the team have also
completed some research on the technical capabilities of this type of suspension system.
Rocker bogie suspension
The main technical aspects of a Rocker Bogie Suspension system are discussed below;
• There are two primary components within a Rocker Bogie suspension system, the Rocker
and the Bogie. This shown clearly in one of the images below.
• These two elements are connected via a free rotating pivot; this is again demonstrated in
the image shown below.
• The design has 6 joints that must be reliably locked after deployment. One joint is motor
driven for deployment.
• Yoke and clevis design for a rocker bridge joint (motorised deploying joint) withstands 714
N-m bending load and 506 N-m torsional load.
• Latch pawl locks into place on the deployed arm, this changes the state of the micro switch
used within the design and subsequently sends electrical signals to state that the arm is
successfully locked and ready for deployment. (NASA, 2003)
Figure 10 – Rocker Bogie joint design
and movement

13
Extreme Tyres
The nature of the lunar surface has already been
highlighted extensive throughout the research which has
been conducted. It has become apparent that there are
extreme conditions to overcome through the design of
the wheel on the moon rover.
Within the design of the drive system of the moon rover
the team have decided that it will be necessary to include
wheel design within this project. The object of this wheel
design is to provide a tire that can withstand multiple
punctures in addition to being high-performance,
efficient, high capacity, and long lasting. This is an
extreme which must be met as this is critical to the
overall success or failure of the overall lunar rover
design. Previous lunar rovers have also been designed
with these wheel requirements having been considered. Some lunar rovers had wire mesh tires
made from zinc-coated piano wire, and the tires on military vehicles are often outfitted with special
inserts that enable them to drive on a flat tire. However, the demands on tires for both types of
vehicles are rising, requiring tires that can support more weight and travel further under stress. The
team have identified similarities between the design for military vehicles and the lunar rover. The
tolerances and extremities to be met by both designs are much the same. For this reason the
research below outlines some technological advances within the military design world which, the
team believe, would be greatly beneficial within this lunar rover design task.
Tire companies, such as Michelin and Pirelli, have developed a few promising prototypes for these
extreme applications, some working in partnership with NASA. From a distance these newly
developed tires may not look very different than +300 million tires that are discarded annually in the
United States. On closer inspection, the design reveals that these tires are not filled with air, and in
some cases do not even use rubber.
In 2005 Michelin introduced the Tweel. The Tweel consists of a central hub connected to a rigid
outer rim by flexible spokes. The spokes and hub are made of plastic structures that deform when
the tire goes over rough terrain, within the context of this project, the terrain discussed here would
be similar to the differing quality and hardness of terrain of the lunar surface. This enables a large
portion of the tire to stay in contact with the surface, even over uneven terrain, which provides
traction and stability. As previously discussed this is a major requirement of any new developments
within lunar rover design as flexibility and the ability of the lunar rover to move over differing types
of surface are now key design requirements.
The deformable hub and spokes also act as shock absorbers that help reduce the vibrations felt by
the vehicle. Additionally, the tire functions well even if some of the spokes are damaged. At high
speeds the Tweel has run into some problems with noise, vibration, heat, and wear. With designing
for the lunar rover in mind, this would not cause many issues as the intention of the design is to
travel at low speeds with high torque.
Figure 11 – Apollo 11 mission

14
Currently, the plan for Michelin’s Tweel design is to introduce it in smaller vehicles first, such as
scooters, small construction equipment, and wheelchairs. In 2009 a small prototype of the new
lunar rover, driving on Tweels, was trialled and formed part of President Obama’s inaugural parade.
(American Physical Society, 2012)
In other tire developments, a next generation tire for the Humvee is made of polymers and has the
interior structure of a honeycomb. The honeycomb structure can support heavy loads and has lots of
room for shrapnel to pass through, while still offering a relatively smooth ride. Additionally, if as
much as 30% of its cells are damaged, the tire suffers little performance loss. Humvees can currently
travel on a flat tire because of their insert design, but testing shows that the honeycomb design
enables them to travel significantly faster and further. This style of design would obviously also be
beneficial to any lunar rover design due to its strong durability and ability to withstand large
amounts of force and pressure. (American Physical Society, 2012)
Within the context of lunar rover design, the Apollo lunar rovers, collaboration between the NASA
Glen Research Centre and the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, resulted in a tire made entirely
from springs. Each Spring Tire consists of 800 helical springs that are woven together by hand. As the
tires travel over rough terrain, the springs flex and relax in conjunction with changes in the surface.
The springs are woven in such a way that they can support heavy loads and continue functioning
even when some of the springs are damaged. This design produces little heat and little energy loss,
and is not affected by vast temperature differences like those between night and day on the moon.
Figure 12 – Tweel in use on rough
terrain
Figure 13 – Tweel in use on military
vehicles

15
In 2009 the Spring Tire was installed on NASA’s lunar test vehicle, which had a successful ride
through the Johnson Space Centre Planetary Analogue Test Site, (aka “rock yard”). There are
obvious benefits to using this tire design within any design produced within the context of this
project. Firstly this tire has been developed for specific application on the moon, therefore the
functional aspect of this design will have great focus and detail within the design to produce the best
result once the rover has reached the lunar surface. The design in this tire also means that if any
design changes are required, then extensive testing of specific expected conditions can take place
with appropriate mechanical test values being applied. This will ensure the wheel is fit for purpose.
In the case of the other designs, testing may not be specific to use on the lunar surface, therefore
caution will have to be applied, and resulting in a longer testing time period before the tire can be
used within any lunar application. (American Physical Society, 2012)
The research presented here has ultimately led to the identification of many design requirements for
this mechatronic design project.
3. Requirements
Many requirements for the design of the lunar rover drive system have been identified within many
areas, such as design for the moon, specification standards and fasteners. These areas of design
requirement have been discussed in detail below.
3.1 Design for the moon
As the identified environment in which this design has to operate successfully, then designing for
lunar requirements is the most important design aspect within this project. The focus is on choosing
and testing components that may be of concern to a mechanical designer. This includes any
component which may fail under loading during any operational aspect of the lunar rover
functionality, such as deployment or simply navigating the lunar surface. These components can
vary from mechanical components (bearings, fasteners, and lubricants), motors, materials and an
Figure 14 – Goodyear spring tire

16
overview of power systems. Component design and selection for use on the moon is driven by the
application and the environment. As has been discussed already, the lunar environment can vary
depending on the region of the lunar surface which the rover may be navigating. This environment
includes moon dust, uneven surfaces, slopes and regions which little information is known about, i.e.
the Polar Regions. For this reason it is important to consider legacy. Legacy “refers to the original
manufacturer’s level of quality and reliability that is built into the parts which have been proven by
(1) time and service, (2) number of units in service, (3) mean time between failure performance, and
(4) number of use cycles.” If a candidate component has a successful legacy, then a designer should
strongly consider using it. As the research presented above has highlighted many instances where
several components have been used successfully within the design of a rover, then these
components will be considered for use in this design due to their proven ability to operate within the
intended environment. (Robotics Institute, 1995) (Beale, D., unknown year)
Issues for Lunar Machinery
Considering the harsh environment in which the lunar rover will be used, there are clearly going to
be issues which may affect the functionality of the lunar rover design and the components which
have been used to construct it. Some of these key issues include;
• Abrasion and wear on parts that contact regolith
• Vacuum welding of metals, which may require special coating and treatments.
• Electrostatic properties of regolith will cause it to adhere to and penetrate bearings,
structural connections, viewing surfaces, solar panels, radiators and antennas.
• Strategies must be put in place to create effective vacuum seals (e.g. for door locks) and
effective bearings (including lubricants, filters, and seals for bearings).
These points all represent possible modes of failure for the design and therefore these issue need to
be considered in depth while proceeding through the design process. In order to achieve a
successful, fully functioning lunar rover, testing will be required at every stage to ensure these
potential issues have all been accounted for within the mechanical design of the rover. (American
Society of Civil Engineers, 2002) (Beale, D., unknown year)
3.2 Standards and References
As with any design project, there are many standard specifications and requirements from
professional bodies which the design must meet in order to be certified as ‘fit-for-purpose’. The
design standards, including space and lunar specific standards which apply to this design project for
a lunar rover are listed below;
• AIAA S-114-2005, “Moving Mechanical Assemblies for Space and Launch Vehicles”
• The Proceedings of the Aerospace Mechanism Symposium.
• NASA/TP-1999-2069888 - NASA Space Mechanisms Handbook.
• MIL-HDBK-5 Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Structures,
Other Standards:
• DOD-HDBK-343 Design, Construction, and Testing Requirements for One of a Kind Space
Equipment
• MIL-STD-100 Engineering Drawing Practices

17
• MIL-STD-1539 Direct Current Electrical Power Space Vehicle Design Requirements
• DOD-E-8983 General Specification for Extended Space Environment Aerospace Electronic
Equipment
• MIL-S-83576 General Specification for Design and Testing of Space Vehicle Solar Cell Arrays
• DOD-STD-1578 Nickel-Cadmium Battery Usage Practice for Space Vehicles
The lunar rover, when complete, will be tested against the various technical data outlined in each of
these standard specifications, therefore it is essential that these requirements are met throughout
the design of the lunar rover to avoid costly redesign at a later stage in the process. (NASA, 2012)
(Beale, D., unknown year)
3.3 Fasteners
Fasteners are an integral component within any design. A failure with a fastener could cause the
failure of the lunar rover and its ability to navigate across terrain. It is therefore necessary to choose
the correct fasteners for use under the loading and pressure shown within the lunar design. Space
fasteners design choices, with attention given to aerospace applications, materials and temperature
ranges, are presented in the Fastener Design Manual (Barrett, 1990), NASA Report RP-1228 (NASA,
1990) MIL-HDBK-5 also contains allowable strengths for many fasteners including those used for MS
(military standard) and NAS (national aerospace standard) (Standard Aero Parts Inc., 2013) (Beale,
D., unknown year)
3.4 Bearings
Bearings are essential to generating the smooth movement of the lunar rover across varying types of
terrain. If the bearings used within the design cease, or become jammed due to moon dust, then
the rover movement will ultimately fail. Rolling-element bearings for lunar applications must
capably withstand the challenges of the lunar environment (temperature extremes, penetrating
regolith and the vacuum environment) and be highly reliable to minimize repairs. For space flights
the AISI 440C (a high hardness, corrosion resistant steel) and AISI 52100 (not as hard or corrosion-
resistant, but better wear resistance) are the most common bearing materials. Shields and seals
Figure 15 – Table of space flight
suitable materials

18
cover the rolling element so they are not exposed and protected to a certain degree from outside
contaminates like regolith. Shields and seals are attached on a bearing’s outer race, and move with
the outer race. A shield will not touch the inner race because of a small clearance gap. Seals do rub
against the inner race but will be less likely to allow regolith particles inside. Thermal control is a
concern in a lunar environment where convection is not an available heat transfer mechanism.
Thermal conductivity through a bearing is increased by the presence of a lubricant. (Robotics
Institute, 1995) (Beale, D., unknown year)
3.5 Lubricants
Bearings require lubricant to work to the functionality in which the design intended to be used. For
bearings to work to their full potential and free and easy movement to allow flexible motion of the
lunar rover lubricant is required to be used on all moving parts of the lunar rover. This will help
overcome any restrictive and wearing movement caused by the moon dust on the lunar surface. In
the past, Lubricant inadequacies have been implicated as a cause of a number of space mechanism
failures.
The three types of lubricants are liquids (lubricating oils, lubricant greases) and solid films, any of
these three types may be present within the lunar rover. An ideal lubricant would retain the desired
viscosity over a wide temperature range in response to the varying and often extreme temperatures
which may be experience in the lunar environment. Lubricants are more volatile in vacuum and heat
than higher molecular weight lubricants, this makes the choosing of a non-volatile liquid for use in
the lunar rover design a key consideration as the lunar rover will be used within a vacuum setting.
Solid films, such as soft metal films, polymers and low-shear strength materials, find use in bearings,
bushings, contacts and gears. (Robotics Institute, 1995) (Beale, D., unknown year)
3.6 Motors
Motors are the essential element which provides the drive mechanism for the wheels. The motor is
the source of speed and torque, determining if the lunar rover has the ability and flexibility to
navigate difficult terrain. The types of motor most commonly used include DC brush, DC brushless
and stepper motors. (Beale, D., unknown year)
3.7 Power System Components – Solar Arrays
The most widely used and cost efficient form of energy conversion is the photovoltaic solar array.
There are three different types of solar array, each provide different power outputs and are
structured in a different way. The three types of solar array are; Single-Crystal Silicon Cells, Gallium
Arsenide Cells, and Semi-Crystalline & Poly-Crystalline Cells. There is currently not enough data on
amorphous cells in order for these to be selected as a serious candidate for space applications as this
a new and emerging technology. When this type of technology has undergone more testing then
this may constitute a power source of the future. Multi-junction cells offer high efficiency and good
manufacturability. Solar arrays can provide power requirements from tens of watts to several
kilowatts with a life span of a few months to fifteen years. The life of a solar array degrades due to
the space environmental effects on the photovoltaic cells. (Beale, D., unknown year)

19
3.8 Power System Components – Batteries
The use of solar arrays or nuclear power are used to provide the lunar rover with a supply of energy,
it is one of the other components, the battery, within the power system which is used to store the
energy being generated by this energy source. Some of the common types of battery used include;
• Silver Zinc Batteries
• Nickel Cadmium (NiCd)
• Nickel Hydrogen (NiH2) – Currently used in place of Nickel Cadmium for space applications
• Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH)
• Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) (Beale, D., unknown year)
3.9 General Considerations
Having considered the more detailed requirements of many aspects of the drive system design
within the lunar rover, there are a few general requirements which must also be met.
• Any hardware or materials used for lunar missions will need to be of a special variety known
as "Flight Qualified".
• Flight qualified materials and parts are always flight proven hardware with program
heritage.
• The process to get any new material or part flight qualified is an arduous and long task.
(Beale, D., unknown year)
This highlights the final design considerations which the group must consider within the lunar rover
design for this project. With all of this information documented, the other design considerations
were also listed within the Product Design Specification which is detailed below.
3.10 Product Design Specification
The PDS below outlines points 16 of the most influential areas when considered in the context of the
design of a lunar rover. Each of the 16 areas is clearly identified and all of the specification points
related to that area are listed clearly in each section.
1. Performance
1.1 The moon rover must be able to navigate a variety of different terrains that include
surface quality and hardness.
1.2 The moon rover must be able to withstand atmosphere in space.
1.3 The moon rover must be able to operate within a gravitational pull of -1.6ms-2.
1.4 It must minimise energy consumption during operation.
1.5 The moon rover must anticipate obstacles such as hole, rocks, walls and ditches with
on-board analysis to prevent the vehicle becoming stuck on the surface on the moon.
1.6 The moon rover must be able to negotiate out of unforeseen locations that may
cause the rover to become stuck.
1.7 The moon rover must be able to detect the inclination angle when it is on slope (the
angle between the horizontal direction of movement and the road surface or the rover base
surface) so that the intelligent controller will be able to detect if the centre of gravity is
within the safe region to avoid tipping-over accidents.

20
1.8 The moon rover must be able to move forward for 200cm approximately and
backward for 50cm.
1.9 The system must detect a possible obstruction while it is moving forward, it must
stop and move backward to re-route its movement.
1.10 The moon rover must be able to carry a load of up to 150kg.
2. Disposal
2.1 The device will not be returning to earth hence all parts should be non-hazardous to
moon environment.
2.2 The device should be able to be left or destroyed to ensure no design secrets can be
obtained by other governments.
2.3 Careful consideration should be taken when choosing the materials for the device (See
‘Materials’)
3. Processes
3.1 There are no limitations to the manufacturing processes as there are no constraints
on the manufacturing facility.
4. Time Scale
4.1. 01/10/12 Project Introduction
4.2. 22/10/12 Project Specification and Project Planning
4.3. 05/11/12 Concept Development
4.4. 03/12/12 Concept Evaluation in Sub-groups
4.5. 10/12/12 Detail Design
4.6. 10/12/12 Milestone: Final Concept chosen
4.7. 11/01/13 FEA optimization
4.8. 18/03/13 Prototyping
4.9. 22/04/13 Final Presentation
4.10. 22/04/13 Milestone: Report and Partial Prototype submission
5. Quality and reliability
5.1 The quality of finish of the product is negligible unless it affects any performance or
engineering constraints.
5.2 As this is a one off production the quality of each part is highly important. To ensure
reliability in function each part will be rigorously checked during and after production, non-
destructively. This will increase manufacturing costs however the cost of failure outweighs
this. For example if a part is to be cast, a mould flow check will be carried out, the mould will
be checked for imperfections and the cast part will be x-rayed after to check for defects.
5.3 The system reliability will be calculated and displayed in a block diagram, to
determine what subsystems are likely to cause the most problems. If it is below 0.8 then
decisions will be made on the need for preventative systems.
5.4 If a standby system is put in place, the reliability of the sensing and switch unit must
be over 0.9.

21
5.5 A fail safe approach will be taken when designing the product. Using root cause and
effect analysis and FMEA, any weak spots in the system/ components will be indentified and
action for monitoring this weakness will be put into effect.
5.6 Computer and physical prototypes will be tested for the most extreme conditions of
loading and environment where possible (see environment and performance).
5.7 As there is no end customer as such, guarantees, warranty service and claim
adjustments are unnecessary.
5.8 Operator training will have to be provided in a precise and fool proof document. It is
assumed that the design team will be on hand but a document of operation must be
provided.
5.9 The company carrying out inspection must have a documented ISO 9000 or ISO 9001
to ensure the organisations quality systems meet written standards. If checked in house, an
ISO 9000 or ISO 9001 audit must be carried out.
5.10 The centre of the tolerance range of the component would ideally be at the centre
of the range of dimensions produced by the chosen manufacturing machine. This will give
the greatest capability without reducing the process standard deviation.
5.11 The quality of the materials used will be determined by the life cycle; environment
conditions and performance (see each of these sections).
5.12 The supplier’s material quality guarantees will be checked over before
commencement of any contracts.
6. Materials
6.1 The frame should be made of a light-weight aluminium alloy
6.2 Tubular components used to; 1. Decrease weight 2. Use readily available manufactured
parts
6.3 Tyre chevrons should be made of titanium to provide traction & resist wear on the lunar
surface
6.4 The engine and fans must be covered in a fine cloth (or Mylar blanket) to filter out lunar
dust
7. Politics
7.1 All parts of the designed concept should be bought in or purchased from British
companies
7.2 Careful marketing policy will eliminate the possibility of unintentional social prejudice or
unwanted implications
7.3 It is not expected that the product will have any social implications
7.4 Not expected that the product launch would have any political implications
8. Weight
8.1 The moon rover’s frame should be designed to carry a load of 150kg and the total weight
of the rover including the frame and any scientific samples recovered and should not exceed
300kg.
8.2 The vehicle needs to have a low centre of mass to minimise the risk of tipping.
8.3 The moon rover must be made from the lightest material possible with sufficient
material properties to complete that parts function to minimise cost on fuel getting to the
moon.

22
Note: The weight should be kept to an absolute minimum while still being able to complete
all its functions completely, as sending 1kg of mass to the moon costs roughly £68,065.
9. Ergonomics
9.1 The controller of the moon rover should be designed to fit the users hand comfortably
and allow them to control all the buttons easily.
9.2 The moon rover does not have a human driver on board and will not need transported at
any point by a human so does not need time focussed on the ergonomics of seating or
handles.
10. Standards Specifications
10.1 The Moon Rover will conform to set communication standards to enable reliable
transmission of the expected data that will be gathered
10.2 The standards were developed by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems
(CCSDS)
10.3 CCSDS is made up of leading space communications experts representing 30 countries,
its founding member space agencies, 28 observer space agencies, and over 140 private
companies. CCSDS members include national space agencies from Japan, the United
Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, Russia, Canada, China, and the United States, as
well as the multinational European Space Agency. In doing this, data transfer will be
straightforward, reliable and robust albeit through a weak-signal relay or direct-to-earth
space links.
10.4 Must meet all standards of cleanliness before sent into space to avoid a risk of
contamination.
10.5 Software must conform to JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C programming
language.
11. Documentation
11.1 A detailed user manual and maintenance instructions should be included with the
product.
11.2 All testing certifications should be retained and recorded.
11.3 The mission aims and mission itself should be well documented
11.4 Build process should be well documented
11.5 Documentation on the product’s specifications should be produced to allow others
to understand the workings and construction of it.
11.6 Sourced material should all be documented.
11.7 Project planning should all be well documented and displayed in an effective
manner
12. Manufacturing Facility
12.1 Manufacturing of prototypes will be done on university premises with university
machines.
12.2 Final design Manufacturing will be outsourced to other manufacturing facilities in the
UK.

23
12.3 The company who can build our design for the cheapest while still ensuring the desired
quality and reliability of the product will be used
13. Packing
13.1. Must be of high quality to protect the rover while in transport
13.2. Minimal cost
13.3. Minimal size
13.4. Minimal weight
13.5. Packaging must be environmentally friendly
13.6. Should be waterproof
13.7. Easily removable
14. Aesthetics
14.1 Must visually convey a sense of durability and high manufacturing quality
14.2 Aesthetics of the rover should contribute to its stability while it is operating in rough
terrain
14.3 Should be coloured contrastingly to its environment for ease of detection
14.4 Shaped in such a manner so as to not obstruct vision from sensors and camera/video
etc.
14.5 External appearance should be shaped in such a way as to protect vital internal
components from impact or other such forces
15. Testing
15.1 As the parts required for the moon rover will be used in a highly demanding and precise
application, visual inspection of all parts being used within the design will be visually
inspected.
15.2 Due to the intensive requirements placed on the functionality and quality of the
components manufactured for the moon rover, visual and mechanical inspection of each
part of the moon rover will be inspected closely.
15.3 In terms of the strength of the material, a standard strength test will be carried out to
ensure the loading limits experienced by the moon rover are well within the limits of the
material.
15.4 The structure of the material is integral to the performance and longevity of the moon
rover and so ultrasonic testing of all metal components will be required.
15.5 The ability of the driving system to cope with the surroundings which will be faced on
the mission will require testing. An appropriate testing facility, providing a rough, cratered
and mountainous surface will be used to test the drive, control and steer ability.
16. Installation
16.1 The frame must have brackets suitable for mounting various sensors onto and have
appropriate space available for said sensors.
16.2 Standardised nuts and bolts should be used to fix parts where appropriate.
16.3 The frame must have ample room in its construction to accommodate the installation
and removal of both the drive system and sensors.

24
16.4 Cable management should be considered within the frame design to allow for easy
installation.
16.5 The drive system should be designed with easy removal and installation in mind so that
adjustments can be made to the system when necessary.
16.6 The sensor systems should be easily accessible while installed to allow for calibration.
Additional Points
• Return continuous video with minimal interruption
• Accomplish an unprecedented 1000 km traverse spanning two years of operation in the
extreme conditions on a surface of fine electrostatic dust.
• Survival in radiation, -180 deg C cold, vacuum, and operations in the heat of +130 deg C
Bibliography for Product Design Specification
George E. Dieter, Linda C.Schmidt; 4th Edition; Engineering Design; 2009; Mcgraw-Hill
International Edition.
John Corbett, Mike Dooner, John Meleka, Christopher Pym; Design for Manufacture;
Strategies, principles and techniques; 1993; Pearson Education; Addison-Wesley Publishers.
By combining all of the gathered information on standards and requirements with the PDS which has
been generated by the team, there are now a comprehensive set of design guidelines which can be
used in relation to the lunar rover design. The drive sub-group will concentrate on those which
affect the drive system components and will design the drive system to strictly adhere to the
guidelines which have been highlighted in this report.
4. Function Means Tree
A function means tree was developed as the initial process in the concept generation stage within
the design process. This identified the key functional areas to be addressed through design in order
to make a successful and functioning lunar rover. The developed function means tree can be seen in
Appendix 1. The drive team sub-group used this function tree, concentrating on the areas which
mainly affected the drive system within the design and used this as a basis to generate some
concepts which are discussed below.
5. Concept Generation
The entire team decided in an early stage of the project to utilise the robotics kit available and use
it’s functionality to drive the development of the physical design of the rover. In a way this was
limiting as it was felt that the kit prevented major innovation to the overall design as it was
important that the parts and functions were not reconfigured in a drastic manner. In light of this it
was realised that the kit was a representation of the moon rover that was being designed for the
purpose of going to the moon and that the eventual design did not have to be limited by the
prototype. With this in mind the team continued with the project developing two final outputs to
the design, a realistic design which shows all the detail of the lunar rover design which would
ultimately be sent on an exploration mission and a theoretical design which will be illustrated within

25
the physical prototype which is produce. This theoretical design will aim to identify key features and
explore how they might work on the realistic design if it were to be manufactured.
Various concepts were therefore suggested to explore different ways the theoretical moon rover
could be driven. The main focus of this exploration was to find creative solutions to the issues the
rover would encounter while in use on the moon, primarily obstacles it may not be able to navigate
around such as craters or rocks. The resulting concepts are presented below:
1. This is the most basic concept created and features the use of
six wheels rather than four. It was theorised that the additional
wheels would provide additional traction helping the rover move
through the moon’s environment. The wheels are heavily treaded
for optimum grip and the frame is symmetrical to prevent the
rover becoming off balanced.
2. This concept uses tank tracks to drive the rover
forward. It was heavily influenced by military and
construction vehicles which regularly operate in rough,
rocky and sandy terrain, similar to that of the moon. The
tracks are intended to be larger than the frame of the
rover to allow the rover to drive if flipped upside down.
3. This concept is influenced by the trolleys that can be
used to transport heavy items up stair cases by attaching 3
wheels to each corer which can rotate independently. In
this way one wheel is always in contact with the ground
surface, even when moving over an obstacle.
4. This concept is based around the idea of splitting the
frame into an articulated structure with each section’s
wheels being driven independently. In this way if a section
of the rover becomes stuck another section is still able to
function and can free it. In addition the articulation allows
the rover to be more flexible and able to respond to
overcoming obstacles such as sudden changes in gradient.

26
5. This concept was created in response to the issue of large rocks on
the moon’s surface and has been designed with a large amount of
ground clearance to avoid the body becoming damaged by them. It
does have the disadvantage of potentially being fragile or unstable
however.
6. This concept once again uses tank tracks for
extra traction on the moon’s surface. It has long stabilising arms which are
intended for use if the rover is moving along steep or precarious terrain as
these arms can reach out, for example downhill below the rover and provide
resistance against the gradient to prevent the rover slipping.
7. This concept is very similar to the previous idea, number 6, as it
features tank tracks as the main method of driving the rover and
stabilisers. In this case the stabilisers are in front of the rover and
are have a very thick tread intended to grip into the surface of the
moon. They would be used in cases where the rover was struggling
to cross an area of ground and required additional grip. The
stabilisers could then be applied to the surface and their additional
grip would pull the rover forward.
8. This concept again makes use of a tank track but has replaced two
outer tracks with a single central one. This would allow the rover to
drive both upright and upside down. Two wheels are included for
additional stability.
9. This concept again attempts to solve the issue of the rover potentially
becoming upside down. The shape shown has been sketched as a way to
allow the rover to function in any of the
three orientations where four wheels touch
the ground. In addition the extra wheels
would give extra leverage against obstacles
which the rover may encounter.
10. This final concept depicts a traditional rocker bogie drive system
used on current rovers. It was felt that in this case the conventional
drive system was the most suitable for the project as it is a
successful design which could be replicated across both the
conceptual moon rover and the physical prototype. This consistency

27
was a desired feature for both designs across the team. For this reason this concept was chosen as
the final design which would be developed in detail for the design of the lunar rover.
6. Selection of Components for Chosen Design
This section of the report will detail the components, mainly the motors and power source which will
be used within the final design. The detail design of these elements is discussed below.
6.1 Moon Rover Wheel Motors and Gearing
Overview
During this section of the moon rover report there will be an in depth description into the types of
motors used to operate the rovers driving and steering capabilities. Along with the selection of the
motors used and their specifications there will also be an analysis of the gearing used within the
operations of driving and steering the rover through the use of harmonic drives.
Motor Selection and Specifications
After undertaking research into previous exploration rovers, key information was obtained. A large
number of the exploration rovers used motors supplied by Maxon Motors to operate functions such
as wheel rotation and wheel steering along with positioning of other key components such as
cameras and sensors. The Maxon motor used in the 2003 rovers Spirit and Opportunity steering and
driving operations was the RE25 model, which was capable of producing 6170 rpm of non-load
speed. Identical motors and gear configurations were used in the wheels steering and turning
actuators of these rovers. Similar to the Spirit and Opportunity rovers our rover will utilize a singular
Maxon motor model for both operations. In the past ten years since these rovers were launched
there have been newer motor models produced which is why our rover will use the Maxon motor
RE30 which has the following characteristics:
 Supply voltage: 48V
 No-load speed: 6180rpm
 No-load current: 73.6mA
 Nominal current: 1.72A
 Terminal resistance: 2.52ohm
 Torque constant: 53.8mNm/A
 Bearing type: Ball Bearings
As the rover will be using a motor with a similar non-load speed value as the Spirit and Opportunity
models, a similar style of actuators can be used. As in the previous rovers there is the problem of
producing the high gear ratio required which will allow the motor to provide the ground speed
requirement to enable the lunar rover to navigate over difficult terrain. As the gear ratio will
undergo high output torques in the operations of steering and driving the decision was made to
utilize harmonic drives in this area.
Standard DC motors use an iron core which results in its magnetically soft cogs, which are polarized,
to be attracted to the nearby permanent magnets. This means that re-magnetization is required so
that the motor doesn’t stop in specific places; this is known as a detent. The drawback of this detent
Figure 16 – The Maxon RE30 motor

28
is that a larger amount of energy needs to be used to operate the motor. The advantages of the
Maxon motor compared to standard motors are as follows;
• The Maxon RE30 motor contains no iron but instead uses a copper winding which
rotates naturally within the magnetic field supplied by high performance Neodymium
magnets.
• The advantages of this include low mass inertia; low inductance; sort-run-up time;
smooth motor running at all speeds; high performance control characteristics; minimal
vibration; and quiet operating volumes.
• As there is no iron present inside the Maxon motor this means that it can perform at a
high efficiency level (above 90%) and a low zero load current (less than 80mA).
Additionally the motor will use less electrical energy during its lifetime because of the lack of iron
components within it and will also have an extended life expectancy than other motors because it
does not suffer from sparking. Another useful aspect of the Maxon motor is its compact design
which includes such features as its centrally arranged magnets. As the magnets are positioned in
this way it allows for a more efficiently designed magnetic circuit which creates a very strong
induction field in the air gap. The motor is also light weight because of its hollow cylinders rather
than full iron cylinder which produces a high performance to space ratio.
In summary the Maxon RE30 motor will be able to provide consistently high performance ratings
through an extended life in service as well as fast acceleration, to allow for fast reaction to changing
terrain, and fast run-up times of only a few milliseconds. (Maxon Motor, 2010) (Maxon Motor, 2010)
(Maxon Motor, 2013)
Harmonic Drives
The harmonic drive has been used in numerous precision positioning applications from robotics to
aerospace because of its high positioning accuracy. This is due to its high reduction ratio; high torque
transmissibility; compact size; and near zero backlash (clearance between the teeth on the flexspline
and circular spline). The reason for there being zero backlash, is due to the naturally occurring radial
pre-loading in the tooth engagement. This means that the characteristics of the components will not
change over their entire lifetime. This becomes a very desirable benefit as it allows for consistent
manoeuvring of the rover over its entire mission duration.
The most typical harmonic drive includes three main components. These are shown in the images
below. As the wave generator, circular spline, and a flexspline, this is placed between the first two
components. The wave generator is an elliptical shape which has a thin walled ball-race fitted
around it. The flexspline is a thin flexible steel cylinder which has one end attached to an output
shaft while its other end comprises of external teeth that fit tightly over the wave generator. The
teeth on the flexspline engage with the fixed circular spline across the points of the wave generators
major axis. The pitch of the teeth on the circular spline and flexspline are the same and the way the
reduction ratio is achieved is by having a smaller number of teeth on the latter.

29
One of the components of the harmonic drive, the Flexspline, is a deformable device which can
cause problems in the dynamics of the component. However recent advances in this area have
solved the problem of deformability through large amounts of friction (which the harmonic drives in
this system would undergo as it will be running at a gear reduction of 1500:1) by incorporating an
adaptive joint torque controller. (DM942, 2013) (Tadayoni, A., Xie, W., & Gordon, B., 2011) (QTC
Gears, unknown date) (IEEE, 2013)
Use of Harmonic Drives in the Wheel Actuators
The design for the moon rover will utilize a rocker-bogie suspension system that will have the Maxon
motors powering the 6 wheels that will be in operation. Along with these motors there will be an
additional 4 motors connected to the front two and rear two wheels which will allow the rover to
turn from stationary. As these motors run at a non-load speed of around 6000rpm the rover will
need to have some way to reduce the speed of these motors into a much slower rate to allow it to
navigate the terrain on the moon. Through using harmonic drives with these high rpm motors the
moon rover can now perform precision positioning applications.
A common actuator will be used for both the wheel drive and the wheel steering as the same motors
will be used in each. The rover itself will be required to operate at a speed of 5cm/s which will
produce a rotational speed in the region of 3.6rpm. This mean that with using the Maxon RE30
motor, which is capable of producing 6180rpm, a gear ratio of 1500:1 will have to be used. As this
ratio is so large that the most effective method of producing this is through the use of harmonic
drives which can operate under the high torque values produced by the motor.
With the motor and gearing methods now selected, to be placed within the wheel actuator, design
considerations had to be altered to allow them to be packaged in the given area. For this to be
accomplished the inner bore diameter of the harmonic drives wave generator had to be increased to
allow for the gear motor to be positioned through the inside of the drive. As the motor will now be
placed through the harmonic drive, due to area constraints, changes had to be made to components
of the harmonic drive. The changes made to the harmonic drive, which ultimately would reduce the
overall mass of the actuator, would also reduce the radial stiffness and torque capabilities of the
harmonic drive. However the decrease in capability of the harmonic drive is acceptable enough for it
Figure 17 – Examples of harmonic
drive systems

30
to still be able to perform its actions with the given Maxon RE30 motor. (NASA, 2004) (Maxon
Motor, 2010) (Maxon Motor, 2013)
6.2 Rocker Bogie Suspension
The aim of this design project was to endeavour to improve the ability of the lunar rover navigation,
minimise energy usage and improve the ability to negotiate different types of terrain. The team feel
that to achieve these aims it was essential to use a Rocker Bogie suspension system.
Many developments to suspension systems on lunar rover designs have taken place since the initial
Apollo Programme exploration. The most beneficial advancement within the space industry is the
development of the rocker bogie system. This system was designed to allow stability even at
extreme angles of up to 45 degrees for Mars exploration. Additional design constraints which have
been overcome include the ability to compact the overall size of the design for travel which then
deploys into a functional frame on landing, withstand the large impact load of landing and
incorporate a suspension system which can suffice for negotiation of rocky terrain. (Harrington, B.
D., & Voorhees, C., 2004)
6.3 Power Requirements for the Mission
Each area of the theoretical rover which will require a power source is included in the table below.
Although it has been hard to estimate the power required by each section theoretically, a value has
been given and the rationale has been stated.
Figure 18 – A detailed view a
harmonic drive system

31
Please note this table assumes that the levelling system is accommodated by the rocker bogie frame
by distributing the weight and providing stability up to 45 degrees. Incorporated into the sensor
programme is a safety check to ensure that this tilt angle will not be exceeded. It is also noted that
the frame design can withstand a force of up to 714 N-m bending load and 506 N-m torsional load
created by centre wheels falling into a 20cm hole. See reference (Harrington, B. D., & Voorhees, C.,
2004)
It is also assumed that the exploration rover will not be drilling to collect samples or analysing them.
If this were to be included then additional power source requirements should be included in the
calculations.
Addition of all the estimated power requirements suggests the maximum total output power
required is 636W for continuous operation.
For deployment, upwards of 333N is necessary, please note that this does not account for the
weight of the frame or complexity impacts upon landing, before fabricating the final realistic lunar
rover design these instances will need to be considered within the design. These calculations for
power requirement have all been considered within the design and prototype of the theoretical
lunar rover with the desire to test all of these calculations in order to gain more reliable information
on the forces and effects of deployment, landing and motion during the life cycle of the lunar rover.
At this stage of development it would then be acceptable to use this generated data to help further
detail the design of the realistic lunar rover before proceeding with further building and testing of
this design. Also, for consideration within calculations it should also be noted that MER drive speed
is 34 metres per hour. (NASA, unknown date)
6.4 Power Source
Research conducted into the previous Apollo missions reveals that out of the successful moon
landings Apollo 11 was the only mission with equipment that was powered by solar radiation
converted through photo-voltaic cells. All other lunar exploration equipment and rovers have been
powered by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator. From NASA resources, it is suggested the
Figure 19 – A table of power requirements for the mission
Sensors: Gyrometer
Shaft encoders
Touch sensors
Ultrasound
Accelerometer
Light sensor/ laser
Hazard cameras
Navigational cameras
P=IV P=1.72A* 48V
P= 82.56W * 6
40W
35W
5W
20W
1W
5W
10W
20W
5W
495.36W
Rationale
Rocker deployment
actuator N/A One time use
Based on typical
values for similar
sytems using
reference [3]
Power Req.Section Area Controlled Part
Heat regulation for
electronics preservation
Control System
Drive System
Frame
Wheel motor x6

32
power source change took place due to the longevity and efficiency of the solar cells being
surpassed by the plutonium source. Similar changes can be seen with Mars exploration rovers where
the first two rovers were solar powered and from there onwards it has been powered by decaying
plutonium. These two technologies will be explored and compared to suggest the best power source
for the moon rover with respect to advances in solar power and the aim of improving the ability of
navigation, negotiating different types of terrain and minimising energy usage.
Solar Power
Photo-voltaic cells have increased in efficiency since 1969 when first used in Apollo 11's EASEP
experiments package. Shown below is a diagram of the seismic experiment equipment which was
powered by solar panels and was manually operated. It is estimated that the efficiency of these
solar cells is as little as 14% accuracy due to available technology of the 1960's. (NASA, unknown
date)
In more recent years exploration mission to Mars have also utilised solar power, such as with the
1997 landing of Sojourner. The picture below shows the solar array which was mounted on top of
the small 11.5kg rover. (NASA, 1997)
The solar cells utilised are made of Gallium Arsenide and are2x4x5.5mm. Overall, the 13 parallel
strings with 18series cells per string are only 18% efficient and could produce only 16.5 watts on
Mars at noon, the equivalent of 45 watts on Earth at noon. The impressive quality about the solar
cells is the ability to withstand temperatures of -140 and +110 degrees. This is all within the size of
0.22 m2 weighing only 0.340kg.
Figure 20 – An example of a solar array for
use on a lunar rover
Figure 21 – An example of a solar
array for use on a lunar rover

33
A controversial issue with solar cells on the moon is that although the moon does spin and therefore
the entire moon is lit by the sun, the axis of rotation may leave certain polar areas in darkness. If
these are the areas to be explored then solar power cannot be used. There is a possibility that an
automated rover on the moon may come into areas of shade if entering craters or bypassing very
large rocky terrain. It is suggested that the steepest angles experienced are 35 degrees and therefore
the height of the rover and solar array will need to be changed to circumvent potential shadows.
This is only suggested to apply to times of potential shadow that will last for more than the
rechargeable batteries can suffice and recharge.
The general downfall of solar cells is their rate of degradation and efficiency. It seems that solar
panels are only used for very short missions as it is easy for the solar cells to become covered in a
thin layer of dust or debris which limits the light that can be changed. For a relevant example,
considering the moon's geology, Regolith (or lunar soil - a fine dust that covers the moon's surface)
may get dislodged by the rover vehicle's tires and settle on the solar panels due to Van Der Waals
adhesive forces. Although it is unproved, it is estimated that dust may cause 22%- 89% of
degradation. (NASA, 2007)
It is for these reasons and for beneficial advancement for Earth's use of solar cells, research and
developments has been conducted by NASA and accompanying organisations. In 2011 a patent was
released for a waterless dust removal device. Using dielectrics a blowing stream is generated by
electrical fields to remove dust or debris off the top of the cells. (NASA, 2007) This works by
applying an alternating current across two electrodes which are separated with a dielectric. A time
varying voltage creates a waveform. Collisions between the ions and neutrals create the induced
flow because plasma generates a body force creating velocity of the surrounding atmosphere.
(NASA, 2007)
Further to this, recent reports of solar cell efficiency have increased to as high as 43% =/- 2.5%.
(Green, M. A., 2011) This Multi-junction cell is made of GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs and is a two terminal
solar junction, triple cell and is produced by Solar Junction. (Green, M. A., 2011) It is disappointing
to state however, that although there have been many advancements in efficiency for the purpose
of the moon rover project the temperatures that the highly efficient solar cells can withstand are
incapable of surviving the temperatures experienced in the moon's atmosphere. Further
developments would need to be taken to apply a more efficient solar panel on a lunar rover.
To summarise the solar discussion, although there have been many advances in efficiency and ability
to self-clean the solar cells, these advancements do not exist with the extended temperature ranges
suited to the temperature experienced in the moon's environment. For this reason the solar panels
will not be used as the mission will last longer than 2 years which may be the extent of the solar cells
lifespan.
An alternative power source is a radioisotope power system.
Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS)
RPS systems have been used successfully on Apollo NASA missions and others such as Galileo,
Voyager and Viking. The success of the power source is due to its high reliability, long life of a
maximum 14 years and non-reliance on the operational environment.
The system works by harnessing the heat transfer from the degradation of Plutonium (Pu-238) which
has an 87.7 year half life.

34
There are two recent developments, the first of which has never before been used in a mission by
NASA or any other space exploration institutions. The first of these developments is an Advanced
Stirling Radioisotope Generator (ASRG). The aim of this generator is to improve the efficiency of the
conversion of heat to increase it from around 5-7% to around 38% and therefore use less Pu-238.
This would in turn reduce the costs and weight utilised by each mission. To give a perspective of the
suspected efficiency increase, it is expected to produce 140-160 Watts of power using less than 1kg
of Pu-238, this is a quarter of the mass used in the original converter. This technology has been
undergoing reliability testing since 2008. (NASA, 2008)
Advanced Stirling Convertor -E2. Courtesy Sunpower (NASA, 2008)
The above diagrams have been included to help describe the function of this convertor. The heat
source is the material plutonium which has an alpha decay of 5.593MeV. As the material decays it
produces a large heat transfer through radiation. The heat generated through the radiation is then
transferred in to electrical energy by the Seebeck effect. This effect is generated when a set of solid-
state thermocouples react to a temperature difference and generate an electrical current; this is
known as a thermo-electric effect. The electricity is then stored in the rechargeable lithium ion
battery that is then used to power the rover. (University of Waterloo, unknown date) This creates a
constant and reliable source.
Figure 22 – An example of a
radioisotope power system for
Figure 23 – An example of a
radioisotope power system for

35
(University of Waterloo, unknown date)
(Glen Research Centre, 2008)
In some exploration cases more than one battery is used dependant on the amount of energy
needed to be stored and utilised.
The secondary system that has been developed recently is that of the Multi-mission Radioisotope
Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) used in the 2009 Mars mission. This works off the same
principle except there are multiple plutonium cells which can generate a much larger power
potential.
(Glen Research Centre, 2008)
A further benefit of the radioisotope power system is the ability to channel any residual heat into
beneficial energy use. A pipe system should be put in place to channel any excess heat back into the
Figure 24 – The seebeck effect
Figure 25 – Construction of a
radioisotope power system

36
rover chassis to re-heat the system if necessary. It is required that the rover be heated during the
night cycle on the planetary surface, otherwise the system will freeze over and cease to operate. It
is essential that the electronics involved in the control system are kept at a stable temperature to
ensure that they can operate. As such, a heating and cooling system must exist and be regulated.
Previous missions to mars have suggested that the optimum temperature range for the circuitry to
work without issue is between 40 degrees Celsius and -40 degrees Celsius. (NASA, unknown date) If
this system was not used further heaters/ coolers would have to be installed and powered to keep
the system running.
All the main electronics must be protected within this system: batteries, electronic circuitry and the
motherboard due to unfiltered solar radiation. To protect the system from solar radiation and help
increase the efficiency of the system gold paint is applied to the inside and outside of the
surrounding box for the circuitry and batteries. The gold paint acts as a reflector and hence it helps
keep heat in and radiation out.
This system will be used due to its reliability, improved efficiency and commercial viability.
When creating a rover which will be going into space there are a lot of considerations that must be
made when choosing technologies. We have looked at materials, shapes and some of the important
components of the moon rover. For the areas we have studies we have looked at what other
moon/mars rovers have used as well as other industries.
6.5 Materials
Since the cost of getting the rover into space is very high, weight is a crucial aspect of the material as
the lighter the frame, the lower the transport cost will be. During the take off process the frame will
be put under a lot of different forces and vibrations so as well as being light the material must also
be strong. We have described some of the materials which the group have created a research
portfolio of below.
Aluminium
Aluminium is a good choice of material for many reasons as it is very
light compared to most metals and has a good resistance to corrosion.
It is more expensive than other standard metals but is cheaper than
some of the other materials in this list such as carbon fibre.
Aluminium is workable but fastening should be done with bolts and
rivets where possible as it is difficult to weld. As well as difficulties
welding it is also difficult to machine. (ALU, 2012)
High Strength Plastics
This is the cheapest of the options highlighted. Plastics have been around for a long time and are
well known for being very light. They have, for a long time, suffered from poor strength qualities, in
relation to their weight especially. With new ways of producing the plastic parts this is changing,
however, as the mould can be designed to strengthen the weak areas. It is becoming evident that
plastics are starting to be used in new applications such as a car shell in some models for example a
Chevrolet Corvette.
Figure 26 – Aluminium material

37
Carbon Fibre
This is another material which has a very high strength to weight ratio,
it is primarily used in F1 and the high end of the automotive industry.
It is becoming more common but is still not widely used because of
its high cost. (Carbon Mods, 2010)
Composite Materials
Composite materials are commonly used in aircraft construction because of their high strength to
weight ratio while also having high resistance to corrosion. These are the key aspects to be
considering for the lunar rover design due to the previously mentioned cost of sending the craft into
space, as well as that it will not receive any maintenance once the rover is on the moon, it is
therefore important that the material chosen is resistant to corrosion from any dust on the moon.
Depending on the materials used, and the way in which the composite is constructed, the prices can
vary, they are generally quite expensive but this is not crucial. (About.com, 2013)
Chosen Material
After weighing up the options of the previously researched materials the team have decided the
frame will be made from aluminium. This is because of its high strength to weight to ratio while also
having an excellent resistance to corrosion, this was identified as being important as the rover will
not be cleaned or serviced once it’s out on the moon. Aluminium offers all these strengths at the
most competitive cost.
6.6 Joining methods
There will be two main forms of joining methods in this moon rover design. The first will be nuts and
bolts, these are for parts which will be moving in some capacity and will require locking nuts so the
nuts will remain on the rover. This is essential as throughout the process of getting the rover to the
moon there will be a lot of different kinds of vibrations and forces acting on the rover which could
lead to nuts shearing off. The second kind of joining method will be rivets. This method is very
similar to nuts and bolts in terms of dealing with forces and stresses but is a more permanent option
as the rivets can’t be removed without physically breaking the component. (Athena, 2005)
6.7 Shape
The shape of the rover does not directly affect technology, but it is a crucial aspect of the design as
the rover will be tackling various terrains which may involve gradients. The rover must be able to
travel along steep gradients in all directions as well as have a high ground clearance. While having
these aspects it must also be compact enough to fit through gaps between rocks and other
obstacles. The frame must work together with the drive and sensors to overcome these obstacles.
The propulsion will come from the drive in the difficult terrains and the sensors will plan a route
which will have as little obstacles as possible. With regards to technology, having a frame which has
some degrees of movement, allowing its shape to change, would allow for the frame to be both
sure-footed and stable, while also being compact and nimble. Some examples of previous mars and
moon rovers have been discussed earlier in the report which all has flexible moving frames. (Athena,
2005) (NASA, unknown date)
Figure 27 – Carbon Fibre material

38
6.8 Fasteners
The fasteners that hold various sections of the power supply casing obviously also have to be
suitably designed so that they operate as required on the moon surface, withstanding high
temperatures if necessary and dealing well with high loads and tensions.
The most suitable material found for the fasteners is Inconel 718, a metal super-alloy. Inconel is
primarily a Nickel, Chromium and Molybdenum alloy which has very high heat and corrosion
resistance. The chemical structure of this alloy is shown in the table below. (ALCOA, 2012) (HPAlloys,
2007)
Bolts made from this material have excellent strength and can operate efficiently in a temperature
range of -253 degrees Celsius to 705 degrees Celsius. This material can be hard to manufacture but
machining bolts is moderately simple provided that the tool is kept sharp, held rigid and not allowed
to weld to the material surface.
Along with the Inconel718 bolts, Keenserts would be utilised to keep the bolts securely held in the
parent material. Keenserts, shown below, are small studs that are driven down through the threads
of the joined part to mechanically lock the bolts into place. A special tool is used to drive the pre-
assembled keys into the material. These inserts are designed to transfer high axial loads into the
base material as efficiently as possible and provide high resistance to pull-out and torque loads.
(ALCOA, 2013)
7. Calculations
The following calculations outline some of the key technical aspects required for this design of a
lunar rover.
7.1 Static Calculations
The calculations below illustrate the lunar rover’s weight and distribution. These values rely on the
friction coefficient in order to provide traction to propel the lunar rover along the lunar surface.
Figure 28 – Chemical requirements for Inconel
Figure 29 – Keenserts bolt

39
Weight and Weight Distribution
Weight = Mass*Gravity
The weight of the lunar rover design has been calculated for both the loaded and non-loaded rover.
It was stated that the lunar rover must be capable of carrying a weight of up to 150 kg. Both of
these calculations are detailed below.
Mass of non-loaded lunar rover = 2.766487e+11 kg
Gravity on Earth = 9.81 m/s2
Non-loaded weight = 2.766487e+11*9.81
Non-loaded weight = 2.713923747e+12 N
This calculation gives a total non-loaded weight, on Earth, of 2.713923747e+12 N
Mass of loaded lunar rover = 2.7664870015e+11
Loaded weight = 2.7664870015e+11*9.81
Loaded Weight = 2.7139237484715e+12 N
The calculations above have detailed the weight of the loaded and unloaded lunar rover on the
Earth’s surface. The following calculations will detail the lunar rover’s weight on the moon’s surface.
Mass of non-loaded lunar rover = 2.766487e+11 kg
Gravity on the Moon = 1.622 m/s2
Non-loaded weight = 2.766487e+11*1.622
Non-loaded weight = 4.487241914e+11 N
This calculation has detailed the non-loaded weight of the lunar rover on the surface of the moon as
4.487241914e+11 N. The calculation below details the weight of a loaded lunar rover on the surface
of the moon.
Mass of loaded lunar rover = 2.7664870015e+11 kg
Loaded Weight = 2.7664870015e+11*1.622
Loaded Weight = 4.487241916433e+11 N
The weight of a loaded lunar rover on the surface of the moon is therefore 4.487241916433e+11 N.
Moment and Friction Coefficient
The frictional force is key to the movement of the lunar rover as the surface provides grip, allowing
the rover to navigate over the terrain in the lunar environment. Research presented earlier in the
report suggests the presence of moon dust on the surface of the lunar environment. In order to
help calculate the frictional force present it has been assumed that the frictional coefficient present
on the surface is similar to that of fine sand on the Earth’s surface. The coefficient of friction of fine

40
sand is given as 0.35-0.45. (USACE, 1992) The coefficient of friction of rubber on a wet asphalt
surface is stated as 0.25-0.75. (Engineering Toolbox, 2013) The value associated with wet asphalt
has been chosen as it was thought this was the closest scenario which was similar to that
represented by the surface and friction scenario which would occur on the lunar surface. The lower
frictional value given for each of these materials will be used in the calculation as this represents the
worst case scenario. This will therefore produce a ‘worst-case’ frictional force value. This will then
indicate to the team that this is the lowest frictional force value which can be expected.
Force of Friction = Weight*µ (rubber-sand)
Force of Friction = 4.487241916433e+11*(0.25-0.35)
Force of Friction = 4.487241916433e+11*0.1
Force of Friction = 4.487241916433e+10 N (when loaded)
Force of Friction = 2.766487e+11*(0.25-0.35)
Force of Friction = 2.766487e+11*0.1
Force of Friction = 2.766487e+10 N (when un-loaded)
The key concern with the frictional force in the design of the lunar rover occurs when the rover is
loaded and in the lunar environment. For this reason this is why the values shown above have been
selected. It is also for this reason that calculations for friction on the Earth’s surface are not being
conducted.
Moment
In order to indentify the force required to move the lunar rover along the lunar surface the moment
force was calculated for both the loaded and un-loaded rover on the surface of the moon. These
calculations are shown below. To ensure this is within safety limits a factor of safety of 2 has been
applied to the weight values calculated previously.
Moment = Force*Distance from lunar surface
Moment = 8.974483832866e+12*396
Moment = 3.553895596149360e+15 N (loaded)
Moment = Force*Distance from lunar surface
Moment = 8.97448382e+11*369
Moment = 3.31158452958e+15 N (un-loaded)
These calculations prove that the design has a great enough moment to provide motion along the
lunar surface as these values are greater than the frictional force values obtained above.
7.2 Power Requirements for Planned Mission
All power requirements for this planned mission have been covered extensively in a previous section
of the report. A summary of the power requirements from this section is included below.

41
Sensors: Gyrometer
Shaft encoders
Touch sensors
Ultrasound
Accelerometer
Light sensor/ laser
Hazard cameras
Navigational cameras
P=IV P=1.72A* 48V
P= 82.56W * 6
Section Area Controlled Part
Heat regulation for
electronics preservation
Control System
Drive System
Frame
Wheel motor x6
10W
20W
5W
495.36W
Rationale
Rocker deployment
actuator N/A One time use
Based on typical
values for similar
sytems using
reference [3]
Power Req.
40W
35W
5W
20W
1W
5W
7.3 Power Transmission Calculation
Gear Ratio
The selected motor, the Maxon RE 30. This motor has a gear ratio of 1500:1. It has already been
discussed that this motor has the ability to produce 6180 rpm. With this gear ratio it produces an
output speed of 3.6 rpm. This is further discussed in a previous section of the report.
Circumference Calculation
The power requirement for this lunar rover design is 636 W for continuous use. The current being
used within the electrical power supply is 1.72 A. This gives a voltage requirement of 369.7 V. For
the purpose of this calculation a value of 370 V will be used. It is essential that this design includes
appropriately dimensioned wheels for use with this power requirement. This calculation is shown
below.
Circumference = Velocity/RPM
The rover has a velocity of 5cm/s = 0.05m/s at an rpm of 3.6
Circumference = 0.05/3.6
Circumference = 0.0138m = 1.38cm
The value obtained from this calculation is obviously very low as the speed and velocity of the lunar
rover is particularly low to provide the ability for the rover to negotiate difficult terrain. The wheel
sizing the actual and theoretical prototypes, shown in later sections, are much larger than this to
provide the momentum for the movement of the rover and to support the weight of the design.
Key Components
All key components have already been indentified in the previous sections.
Wheel Sizing
The wheel diameter which is proposed for use in the realistic design is 300mm. This is very similar to
values which have been used in previous moon rover missions.

42
Torque Calculation
The torque required for this design is shown in the calculation below.
Torque = Distance*Force
Torque = 369*8.974483832866e+12
Torque = 3.311584534327554e+15 Nm (loaded)
Torque = Distance*Force
Torque = 369*8.97448382e+11
Torque = 3.31158452958e+14 Nm (un-loaded)
Torque requirements have been produced for the loaded and unloaded lunar rover design for use on
the lunar surface. Again please note that the force used in this calculation includes a factor of safety
of 2.
Momentum
It is important to also calculate the momentum of the lunar rover. In order to make the design more
energy efficient it was decided to keep the value as low as possible.
Momentum = Mass*Velocity
Momentum = 2.7664870015e+11*0.05
Momentum = 1.3824350075e+10 kgm/s (loaded)
Momentum = Mass*Velocity
Momentum = 2.766487e+11 *0.05
Momentum = 1.3832435e+10 kgm/s (un-loaded)
The calculations above show the momentum values for both the loaded and un-loaded rover on the
lunar surface.
8. Prototyping
Most of these materials and joining methods are not accessible for our prototype due to various
reasons, so in order to replicate them we have used alternate methods. As a material for the frame
we have used acrylic sheets of plastic. This material has a very good strength to weight ratio for the
scale of our prototype. With access to the laser printer it is also very good for manufacturing with
regards to speed and quality. For joining the acrylic together we have used nuts and bolts. They also
have a very good strength to size ratio and are very useful in prototyping as they are not permanent,
allowing the fastening to be removed and adjustments made to improve performance.
8.1 The Theoretical Prototype
The theoretical prototyping was achieved by using simplistic methods as a substitute for more
expensive alternatives. The basic prototype consists of some acrylic which is attached to the
National Instruments Robotics kit by using standard available nuts and bolts. The aim of this

43
prototype was to explore configurations and options within the design while keeping costs low as
this was only for test purposes.
Some of the initial development steps within the theoretical prototyping are illustrated below;

44
The images below show the theoretical, physical prototype which has been developed to prove the
drive concept of the design, name the Rocker Bogie suspension system design.

45
The layout drawing which was used to create the parts for the theoretical prototype is attached as
Appendix 2 at the end of the report.
8.2 The Realistic Prototype
The images displayed below show the realistic design prototype which has been developed using the
CAD system. This design is more realistic to the final design which the team would choose to send
on a mission to explore the surface of the moon.
In order to gain better understanding of our theoretical model we would continue the design work
by using a solid modelling package, Pro Engineer. This allowed us to create and 3D representation
of the model that was parametrically correct and software has the ability to change dimensions and
refine. The following sections show how the model was created and discussion of the parts.

46
The Model
The following section takes into consideration
the parts needed for the theoretical model
including our chosen rocker bogie system and
goes into detail of the design of it. These
components were hard to find images of and
dimensions are specific to our model as these are
not commonly made/ used parts.
The Rocker
To the left is the rocker, there are two on
the rover with it being a six wheel rocker
bogie design. It is positioned at the front
of the frame and has the greatest angle of
adjustment. It has a motor and it is
independently steered and controlled.

47
The Bogie
The bogie system is located at the back of the
moon rover frame and it drives the mod wheel
and the rear wheel. Both of these wheels are
steered and controlled independently.
The Mid-link
The mid link arm acts to join the rocker bogie
system and connects at the top of the frame to
complete the mechanism.
The Frame Assembly
The frame assembly that incorporates all the
components shown previous is shown in the image.
The main body of the rover plays a pivotal part of the
assembly where each rocker bogie system connects. It
provides a base for the majority of the assembly
action. It is clear that the robot is made for passing
obstacles with the design of the rocker bogie system it
can overcome a number of obstacles whilst remaining
stable. The rocker bogie system allows it to adjust
itself to remain balanced whilst climbing steep slopes and they operate each rocker and bogie
independently for stability. At the rear of the robot we can see the power unit. At the front we can
see the control system for the rover.

48
The Wheel
The wheel shown within the realistic model is
an adaptation of the Tweel. The Tweel was
highlighted earlier in the project as one of the
newly developed tires which would be well
suited for use on the design of the team’s lunar
rover. The design has been adapted with
different dimensioning of the honeycomb
structure on the interior to allow for better
performance when navigating difficult terrain.
FEA and Material Selection
To select a material to be used for the wheels of the team’s moon rover, the function and
requirements of the wheels were analysed. As the wheels are based around the idea that the
material is allowed to flex substantially within its elastic deformation limit, the material chosen had
to be able to stand up the forces upon it whilst being as lightweight as possible and still allowing a
suitable amount of deflection.
Shown in the figure below, is graph generated on Cambridge Engineering Selector. The graph shows
all available materials plotted on a graph with their densities against their yield strength.
Because the idea of having a wheel which deflects as it is loaded is already a viable product, the
materials for the wheel have already been assigned and tested numerous times in various
environments. As with all product design there are always a number of available materials which are
suited to the application, so CES was utilised to determine any similar materials which would
perform to the same level as polyurethane for the required function. After research, it was deemed
that there is no reason why a polyurethane wheel should not work within a lunar environment, but
other materials might have greater functionality for the application.
Figure 30 –Material
selection chart

49
Shown in the nest figure is the area of the graph surrounding polyurethane on a graph of flexural
modulus against yield strength. The flexural modulus is the tendency for a material to bend, the
stress to strain ratio in flexural deformation. Plotting this against yield strength allows us to see how
much a material will bend and at which point it will begin to deform plastically as opposed to
elastically. Plastic deformation is not desirable for this application. The graph shows that there are
no materials which are immediately similar to polyurethane, and so it was decided that the moon
rover’s wheels would be manufactured from this material.
Analysis was then carried out to the best of our ability using the Finite Element Analysis tools within
the Pro Engineer CAD modelling package. For this, a custom material was created to simulate the
properties of mouldable Polyurethane. The forces were based upon forces applied on earth, with
the mass of the rover taken as 700Kg, and each of the six wheels would evenly support this mass.
The evaluated wheel is shown in the figure below. The analysis showed that the wheels deflected by
a very small amount, and so this design would need to be altered significantly to operate properly.
An optimization study would be carried out to calculate the optimum thickness of the plastic struts
which allows the desired deformation.
Polyurethane
Figure 31 –Polyurethane selection chart
Figure 32 –FEA analysis of the Tweel

50
If the rover was to be sent to the moon, further analysis on the wheels of the vehicle would need to
be carried out. Obviously the gravity experienced on the moon is significantly less than that on
earth, and so each of the rover’s six wheels would have far less weight to support. If the wheel is
designed correctly, the wheels would deform on earth far more than they would on the surface of
the moon. Because the wheel is required to flex when moving over uneven terrain, the wheel would
need to be designed based on the gravity value of the moon, meaning that whilst on earth the wheel
would not be able to be loaded as it would most likely fail. Following on from disastrous space
missions such as Apollo 1 the challenger space shuttle, lessons have been learnt in space
exploration. Whilst this rover is going to be unmanned, failure within components is unacceptable
because it could hinder or end the entire mission. As on the challenger, where all seven crew
members were killed because a tank seal failed due to the changes in temperature, the wheels on
the rover will need to operate well in all environments.
9. Project Management
The drive group sub team had a total of five members and were assignment specific roles for the
duration of the project. The tasks assigned were as follows;
Alexander Clayton
• Market Research – review of existing products
• Selection of motors, drives and actuators
• Building and testing of theoretical prototype
Catriona Provan
• Concept generation and write-up
• CAD modelling
Elaine Macqueen
• Market Research – technology review
• Selection of power system and power requirements for mission
• Building and testing of theoretical prototype
Kerrie Noble
• Team leader
• Definition of requirements for design and PDS
• Function means tree
• Calculations
• Structuring and creation of report
• Project Management write-up
Simon Walls
• Deputy team leader

51
• Modelling of realistic prototype
• FEA, material selection and fastener selection
The team created a Facebook group in order to help with communication and organisation
throughout the project, alongside a team Dropbox folder allowing all generated material to be
shared amongst all group members. Below are the communications from the team leader to all
members of the group illustrating the group organisation for this project;
20/02/13
*IMPORTANT POINT* we will be having a meeting tomorrow in the 4th year studio area in
architecture to sort everything out, this will be at 12 and all members of the drive and frame groups
should attend.
21/02/13
Hi guys,
So our meeting today has decided the following;
- the final design will be a flat middle frame with a rocker bogie drive system
- the CAD model will need to be of a scale of 5:1 compared to the prototype (in other words the CAD
model is x5 larger)
- the groups for building, modelling and writing for drive and frame are as follows;
BUILD
- Alex
- Elaine Macqueen
- Andrew Brown
- Joanne Rainey
- Gordon Armstrong
CAD
- Simon Walls
- Catriona Provan
- David Packard
- James Frame
REPORT
- Kerrie Alexandra Noble
- Iona Smith
- Bex Reilly
- We will be having weekly team meetings from now on, for EVERYONE, on a Friday at 12pm
- If any prototype or development work is being carried out can you make sure photographs etc. are
posted here so they can be included in the report

52
Thanks
11/03/13
Catriona Provan Simon Walls - can you write-up some descriptions of the concept ideas for me? I
have no idea what they are to do it myself!
Static Calculation
-weight and its distribution
- moment and friction coefficient
Power Requirements for Planned mission
Power Transmission Calculation
Speed Calculation
Key Components
Wheel Sizing
Speed transformation among the key components of the drive system e.g. gear ratio selection
Torque calculation from wheel, propagating to drive source
- If the drive group can help with finding info for any of the following it would be great, xiu just listed
this as what we need to include in the report, those working with the frame group need to find info
about weight etc. Simon Walls can you find me info on power transmission, speed calculation, wheel
sizing, wheel transformation, torque and drive source as this all relates to the wheel which you have
made on CAD. Catriona Provan Elaine Macqueen
Drive Team Objectives for this week -
Simon Walls Catriona Provan - CAD Modelling
Elaine Macqueen - specify which solar panels and power system along with relevant info for
calculations
Alex Clayton - specify the exact motor which will be used along with relevant info for the calculations
Me - Calculation - can you please make sure you get your information to me as I can't do the
calculations without it!
18/03/13
For drive team I’m still expecting
Simon Walls Catriona Provan - CAD Modelling
Elaine Macqueen - specify which solar panels and power system along with relevant info for
calculations
Alexander Clayton - specify the exact motor which will be used along with relevant info for the
calculations
I definitely need these before the end of the week.
I will not be impressed if all of this stuff just gets thrown at me the weekend before hand-in as I

53
expect to be spending this time on my individual project. Expect to have things come flying back at
you and expect to have more work to do to contribute to the report if this happens. Ideally I need
things by the start of Easter for the report.
28/03/13
Hi Everyone,
Just a reminder that I still need these things for the report;
Cat - written descriptions for each of the concept generation ideas
Simon - Cad pictures and descriptions to go with this for the report
Alex - motor selection with complete description including speed (rpm), torque ratings etc.
Elaine - Power source with description and power generation etc.
Alex and Elaine - I also need pictures of the prototype with some descriptions for the report.
I need the power source and motor stuff by no later than Tuesday of next week as I have calculations
to do with these values. As for the rest of the stuff I need it by the 15th, the end of the two week
break so it can be put into the report.
Thanks,
Kerrie
06/04/13
Hi Everyone,
I set a deadline of Tuesday for having the written sections for motor and power supply selection for
the moon rover report completed and set to me in order for me to do the calculations required. This
is now Saturday and I still do not have these. I need these sections by the end of tomorrow as this is
now dragging on and getting ridiculously close to the week full of hand-ins we all have.
The people in charge of doing the practical work, Elaine and Alex, also need to provide this section of
the report, with pictures and full descriptions of the actual prototype. I want this by the end of the
week.
Cat and Simon, as I said before, I need a section completed covering each of the concept ideas I also
want this by this coming week. You also need to put together a section with your CAD models and
descriptions I need this by the end of next week.
We all have lots of coursework to do so trying to do other bits of coursework is no excuse for not
doing this.
Thanks,
Kerrie

54
18/04/13
Hi everyone,
I'm going to be spending tomorrow putting this report together. If I’m still waiting for you to send
me something can I please have it by end of today of by at least 9am tomorrow morning. Also there
is still one bit missing - a written section explaining the features of the built prototype. Alex and
Elaine - this was your area, I’ve spoken to Elaine about this so Alex is there any chance you could
write something for this using the photographs that Andy brown put on Facebook. If you could do
that by tomorrow morning I’d be very grateful.
Thanks,
Kerrie
19/04/13
Hi everyone,
I've added you all to the Dropbox file. The moon rover report is in there, its titled moon rover
project. This is basically how far I got with it today. There are still a few bits to fill in and a little bit
of formatting but I’ll do that on Sunday. If you have a suggestion of something that should be added
let me know.
Thanks,
Kerrie
In some of the correspondence shown it is apparent that some of the deadlines set within the group
were not met. This has been due to time constraints and work load for other projects. At the time
of submission however, everyone has contributed what was needed for the report submission.
Weekly planning sheets which were also used to help with the organisation of this project have also
been attached in appendix 3 and 4.
10. Conclusion
At the beginning of this project the team highlighted three main areas of concern within the design
of a new lunar rover. These three areas were;
• Designing so that the moon rover has a more flexible ability to navigate around different
terrains
• To design to minimise energy usage to enable a maximum distance to be covered during the
mission
• To design in the ability for the moon rover to negotiate terrain surfaces with different terrain
surface quality and hardness.
The decision taken within this project was to concentrate on these main areas and use the
advancement in technology within these areas to help design a moon rover with substantial
capabilities in these three areas.

55
More Flexibility
The team feel this has been achieved within the design through the combined use of a Rocker Bogie
suspension system, the Tweel wheel the use of a radioisotope power system. The Rocker Bogie
system gives the design flexibility when moving across uneven, rough terrain, as shown within the
images of the theoretical prototype development. By using this type of system alongside the Tweel
design, the team feel that this ultimately achieves the goal which was set at the beginning of the
project. The design can not only traverse across difficult terrain, but it can do so with accuracy and
without fear of damaging the wheel component.
The design also included a radioisotope power system. It had initially been thought that a solar
array would have been the power choice for the design. However, on further research the decision
to use the radioisotope system was made. This gave the lunar rover design more flexibility in the
hours within which it could operate, the charging which could occur and the flexibility to explore any
area of the lunar surface, including the Polar Regions which are shaded in constant darkness.
The other improvement area considered, which the power system design also played a key role in,
was to minimise energy usage.
Minimise Energy Usage
As discussed within the report the radioisotope system has been utilised within this design due to its
two recent developments, the first of which has never before been used in a mission by NASA or any
other space exploration institutions. The first of these developments is an Advanced Stirling
Radioisotope Generator (ASRG). The aim of this generator is to improve the efficiency of the
conversion of heat to increase it from around 5-7% to around 38% and therefore use less Pu-238.
This would in turn reduce the costs and weight utilised by each mission. To give a perspective of the
suspected efficiency increase, it is expected to produce 140-160 Watts of power using less than 1kg
of Pu-238, this is a quarter of the mass used in the original converter. This technology has been
undergoing reliability testing since 2008. (NASA, 2008) This therefore helps to highlight how the
team have successfully achieved there minimised energy usage target within the proposed design.
The last target to be met was to provide the lunar rover with the ability to navigate difficult terrain.
Navigate Difficult Terrain
In a way this target was met through the completion of the previous two targets which had been
established. By combining the previous two elements in the design, as discussed above, the team
have also ensured that this design has the ability to navigate across difficult terrain successfully.
Having therefore achieved the three main objectives which were derived at the outset of the project
the team feel this design has been a successful one. There are a few instances where the team
would have liked to have utilised more technologically advanced components within the design and
these instances are expressed within the report. However, at this current time we feel it would be
inappropriate to include these elements within the team’s design as rigorous space-flight testing has
not been conducted on these components. To that extent, the team are happy with the design and
outcome which has been reached.

56
References
About.com, 2013, About Composites, [ONLINE] Available at; http://composite.about.com/ [Accessed
19/04/2013]
Alcoa, 2012, ALCOA and Aluminium Again Advance Space Exploration, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/news/news_detail.asp?pageID=20120824005558en&newsYear=2
012 [Accessed 19/04/2013]
ALCOA, 2013, Bolts and Screws, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.alcoa.com/fastening_systems/aerospace/en/product_category.asp?cat_id=674
[Accessed 19/04/2013]
ALU, 2012, Bringing the World Closer with Aluminium, [ONLINE] Available at; http://transport.world-
aluminium.org/index.php?id=93 [Accessed 19/04/2013]
American Physical Society, 2012, Answering the Call for Extreme Tires, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/action/extremetires1.cfm [Accessed 19/04/2013]
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2002, Engineering, Design and Construction of Lunar Bases,
[ONLINE] Available at; http://mvl.mit.edu/jclub/spr04/building-lunar-bases.pdf [Accessed
19/04/2013]
Athena, 2005, Mars Exploration Rovers, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://athena.cornell.edu/kids/cs_madsen_questions.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Baker, D., 1971, "Lunar Roving Vehicle: Design Report," Spaceflight, Vol. 13, July 1971, pp. 234-240
Beale, D., unknown year, Chapter 6: Component and Material Selection, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~dbeale/ESMDCourse/Chapter6.htm [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Carbon Mods, 2010, [ONLINE] Available at; http://www.carbonmods.co.uk/ [Accessed 19/04/2013]
DM942, 2013, Transmission Systems, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://classes.myplace.strath.ac.uk/file.php/15931/DM942_Transmission_Systems.pdf [Accessed
19/04/2013]
Engineering Toolbox, 2013, Friction and Coefficients of Friction, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/friction-coefficients-d_778.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Gear Product, 2006, Gear Product News, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.gearproductnews.com/issues/0406/gpn.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
George E. Dieter, Linda C.Schmidt; 4th Edition; Engineering Design; 2009; Mcgraw-Hill International
Edition.
Glen Research Centre, 2008, Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/TECB/RPS_MMRTG_Jan2008.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Green, M. A., 2011, Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 39), [ONLINE] Available at;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.2163/pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]

57
Harrington, B. D., & Voorhees, C., 2004, The Challenges of Designing the Rocker-Bogie Suspension for
the Mars Exploration Rover, [ONLINE] Available at; http://trs-
new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/38435/1/04-0705.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
HPAlloys, 2007, INCONEL, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.hpalloy.com/alloys/descriptions/INCONEL718.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
IEEE, 2013, Xplore, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/cookiedetectresponse.jsp [Accessed 19/04/2013]
John Corbett, Mike Dooner, John Meleka, Christopher Pym; Design for Manufacture; Strategies,
principles and techniques; 1993; Pearson Education; Addison-Wesley Publishers.
Kudish, H., 1970, “The Lunar Rover." Spaceflight. Vol. 12, July 1970, pp. 270-274
Kurt, 2004, Lunar Rover Handbook, [ONLINE] Available at; http://schwehr.org/blog/archives/2004-
02.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Maxon Motor, 2010 Maxon Motor Drive Systems, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.storkdrives.se/FB_Antriebssysteme_von_maxon_motor_en.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Maxon Motor, 2010, Robot Performance Moves NASA with Maxon Motors, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.maxonmotor.co.uk/maxon/view/news/PRESSRELEASE-cape_canaveral_tour_guide
[Accessed 19/04/2013]
Maxon Motor, 2013, Product Catalogue, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.maxonmotor.co.uk/maxon/view/catalog/ [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 1996, A Description of the Rover Sojourner, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/rover/descrip.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, unknown date, Spacecraft: Surface Operations: Rover, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/spacecraft_rover_wheels.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 2008, The Athlete Rover, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_748.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 2012, Technologies of Broad Benefit: Power, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/mission/technology/technologiesofbroadbenefit/power/ [Accessed
19/04/2013]
NASA, 2010, Next Mars Rover Sports a Set of New Wheels, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/msl20100701.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 1999, The Legacy of Project Apollo, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/legacy.htm [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 2003, Blast-Off on Mission: Space, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinoff2003/ch_2.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]

58
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19950017274_1995117274.pdf
http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/38435/1/04-0705.pdf
NASA, 2012, Standards and Technical Assistance Resource Tool, [ONLINE] Available at;
https://standards.nasa.gov/ [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 1990, NASA Report RP-1228, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900009424_1990009424.pdf [Accessed
19/04/2013]
NASA, 2004, The Use of Harmonic Drives on NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/13269/1/01-2004.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, unknown date, In-Situ Exploration and Sample Return: Autonomous Planetary Mobility,
[ONLINE] Available at; http://marsrover.nasa.gov/technology/is_autonomous_mobility.html
[Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, unknown date, Apollo 11 mission information, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/EASEP_pass.jpg [Accessed 19/4/2013]
NASA, 1997, Mars Micro-Rover Power Sub-System, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/roverpwr/power.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 2007, United States Patent Document, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-
Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f
=G&l=50&s1=7999173.PN.&OS=PN/7999173&RS=PN/7999173 [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, 2008, Space Radioisotope Power Systems, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/TECB/RPS_ASRG_Handout_2008.pdf [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, unknown date, Spacecraft: Surface Operations: Rover, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/spacecraft_rover_temp.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
NASA, unknown date, Spacecraft Aeroshell, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/spacecraft_edl_aeroshell.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Robotics Institute: Berkelman, P., 1995, Design of a Day/Night Lunar Rover, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub1/berkelman_peter_1995_1/berkelman_peter_1995_1.pdf
[Accessed 19/04/2013]
Standard Aero Parts Inc., 2013, Product Lines, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.standardaeroparts.com/products.asp [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Tadayoni, A., Xie, W., & Gordon, B., 2011, Adaptive control of harmonic drive with parameter varying
friction using structurally dynamic wavelet network, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12555-011-0107-5 [Accessed 19/04/2013]

59
University of Waterloo, unknown date, Thermoelectric Introduction, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://www.mhtl.uwaterloo.ca/TEC_master.html [Accessed 19/04/2013]
Usace, 1992, Friction Coefficient for Concrete Cast on Soil, [ONLINE] Available at;
http://usacetechnicalletters.tpub.com/ETL-1110-3-446/ETL-1110-3-4460006.htm [Accessed
19/04/2013]

60
Appendix 1- Function Means Tree

61
Appendix 2 – Theoretical Prototype CAD Drawings

62
Appendix 3 – Weekly Plan1

63
Appendix 4 – Weekly Plan 2

Moon Rover Project

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

More from Kerrie Noble

In this document

Moon Rover Project