5. METHODOLOGY
The present work aims to reflect on arguments,
based on legal reasoning and argumentative: the
semantics and the syntax of legal argument.
6. In this section we will demonstrate, through the arguments of
authors advocate the principles of solidarity and self-determination,
as relations between the arguments that make these standards be
sustained or not within the semantic and syntax in legal reasoning.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
7. Thornberry (1989) :“self-determination is a concept of liberation”;
Weller (2009): “ self-determination arises from a colonial context”;
Tomuschat (1993)“self-determination viewed as political claim,
asserted on grounds of solidarity by all third world nations”.
All authors agree that SD affects directly the respect upon HUMAN
RIGHTS and proves a different standard behavior by denotation.
REASONS OF SELF-DETERMINATION
8. Wellman(2000)“new human rights should be thought of as
solidarity rights”.
Brunkhorst(2007) “a rule that cannot occupy a capitalist space”.
Juul(2013) “a mutual responsible orientation to relationships”.
All authors agree that solidarity is a solid argument to
support negotiations involving intercultural issues as a
paradigm for universal HUMAN RIGHTS.
REASONS FOR SOLIDARITY
10. CONCLUSIONS
Debate and dissent about both principles: SELF
DETERMINATION AND SOLIDARITY
Guided and limited by elements of syntax and
semantics of the legal reasoning
To achieve arguments to reach more justice
in international conflicts.