More Related Content
Similar to Mix use building case Study
Mix use building case Study
- 1. NITESH D. PARMAR BARC1527SEM – 8 A . S . A . P MIX USE HIGHRISE BUILDING CASE STUDY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-8
- 2. Seoul, South Korea PrincipalArchitect – The JerdePartnership Function – Mixed use building Site Area – 294,613 m2 LOCATION: Located in the evolving Hapjeong neighborhood in downtown Seoul, Mecenatpolis is a transit-oriented destination adjacent to the Hapjeong train station
- 3. PROJECT FEATURES • Thethree high-rise luxury residential towers and one high- rise class-A office tower, all above an open-air mixed-use public realm with retail, dining and vibrant communal spaces. And democratic decision making for the whole community. • A local NGO organizes the teaching. Aesthetically inspired by the elegant form and curve of a natural canyon, Mecenatpolis’ designcaptures a free-flowing rhythm from top to bottom. Jerde incorporated the region’s age-old concept of a ‘unified well’ to shape the main central plaza that is Mecenatpolis core gathering area.
- 4. Infrastructure The open-air villagecomprises nearly 90,000 square meters of retail and dining, as well as an events auditorium and public park for recreational and cultural activities where visitors and residents can gather and engage. the park will serve as an outdoor garden where sculptures from local students will be displayed.
- 5. Architectural features The organicdesign of the complex evolved by reinforcing key connections through the site from the station to the surrounding neighborhoods, creating a fluid pedestrian experience within the retail, while making the best use of the location in this emerging neighborhood next to one of Seoul’s busiest transportation hubs, bringing like-minded people together in a positive environment to inspire the generation of new ideas. Terraced balconies, glass bridges, landscaped roof gardens, open-air spaces, mesmerizing water features and a grand central plaza all reinforce the idea of a fluid and choreographed circulation system at the core of the retail complex. the high-rise towers include over 160,000 square meters of luxury housing units and nearly 50,000 square meters of creative office space.
- 6. FLOOR PLANS 1 STLEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10. BRICKELL - CITYCENTRE Principal Architect – BERNARDO FORT-BRESCIA Function – Mixed use building Site Area – 18000 Sq. Mt LOCATION - Miami, Florida, United States. Serviced appartments-108,00 sf Hotel - 218,00 sf Office tower - 742,000 sf Shopping center - 505,000 sf
- 11. PROJECT FEATURES • BricknellCity Centre will be one of the largest LEED-certified projects in the US. • Its luxury retail space features a $20M elevated glass, steel and fabric trellis called the Climate Ribbon that helps create an energy- efficient micro-climate. And Car2Go is providing a low- emission smart car service. • The massive mixed-use project also includes two 269k SF Class-A office towers and two condo towers, totaling 780 units; a 622- seat dine-in cinema; a hotel with 263 rooms and 89 serviced apartments. Opening: Office, hotel and condo in late 2015, with retail in 2016. • Phase 1 high-rises complete -2012-14 • Phase 2 construction completed- 2017
- 12. FLOOR LEVELS LEVEL 07-36LEVEL 42 LEVEL 37-41 LEVEL 43
- 13. ROOF DESIGN AND SUSTAINABLE FEATURES HDAare designers for the Climate RibbonTM, a continuous surface of glass (11,000 m2) and architectural fabric sun-screening blades which has been fine-tuned to provide an effective microclimate within the centre, attenuating the discomfort associated with hot and humid Miami weather solely through the use of passive energy strategies. BRICKELL CITY CENTRE strives to bring only LEED gold designation but bring about a new paradigm in large scale urban development. SUSTAINABLE FEATURES: Energy efficiency, System commissioning and Energy optimization, Water efficiency, Building materials, Construction waste management, Construction methods.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. INFERENCES 1) The planningof city was well executed because of the security and no interlinking with one other facilities. 2) Residential and shopping areas were well planned with intermediate green spaces for a better environment. 3) Sustainable techniques followed were working out properly. 4) Roof design helped to create the micro climate in the public spaces
- 17.