The document discusses the MESUR (Making Use and Sense of Scholarly Usage Data) project which aims to develop new metrics for scholarly impact and prestige based on usage data from digital scholarly resources rather than just citations. The key points are:
1) MESUR analyzes over 1 billion usage events of scholarly articles and develops network-based metrics from usage patterns to map the structure of science.
2) Preliminary results show relevant structure in usage-based network maps that correlate with traditional citation-based metrics.
3) MESUR has produced a variety of usage and citation-based metrics and developed online tools for exploring these metrics.
The presentation explores the trend towards a scholarly communication system that is friendly to machines. It presents 3 exhibits illustrating the trend and 1 exhibit illustrating inertia in the system. It makes the point that machine-actionability can be much easier achieved if content and metadata are available in Open Access and under a permissive Creative Commons license. It also observes that even with content and metadata openly available, new costs related to advanced tools to explore the scholarly record will emerge. Finally, it points at significant challenges regarding the persistence of the scholarly record in light of increasingly interconnected and actionable content and advanced tools to interact with it.
The slides were used for a plenary presentation at the LIBER 2011 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on June 30 2011.
Keynote presentation delivered at ELAG 2013 in Gent, Belgium, on May 29 2013. Discusses Research Objects and the relationship to work my team has been involved in during the past couple of years: OAI-ORE, Open Annotation, Memento.
Being Reproducible: SSBSS Summer School 2017Carole Goble
Lecture 2:
Being Reproducible: Models, Research Objects and R* Brouhaha
Reproducibility is a R* minefield, depending on whether you are testing for robustness (rerun), defence (repeat), certification (replicate), comparison (reproduce) or transferring between researchers (reuse). Different forms of "R" make different demands on the completeness, depth and portability of research. Sharing is another minefield raising concerns of credit and protection from sharp practices.
In practice the exchange, reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments is dependent on bundling and exchanging the experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows and so on along with the narrative. These "Research Objects" are not fixed, just as research is not “finished”: the codes fork, data is updated, algorithms are revised, workflows break, service updates are released. ResearchObject.org is an effort to systematically support more portable and reproducible research exchange.
In this talk I will explore these issues in more depth using the FAIRDOM Platform and its support for reproducible modelling. The talk will cover initiatives and technical issues, and raise social and cultural challenges.
FAIRDOM - FAIR Asset management and sharing experiences in Systems and Synthe...Carole Goble
Over the past 5 years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs and so forth. Don’t stop reading. Data management isn’t likely to win anyone a Nobel prize. But publications should be supported and accompanied by data, methods, procedures, etc. to assure reproducibility of results. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans as part of the proposal process for projects to be funded. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. The multi-component, multi-disciplinary nature of Systems Biology demands the interlinking and exchange of assets and the systematic recording
of metadata for their interpretation.
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship (http://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618) has been an effective rallying-cry for EU and USA Research Infrastructures. FAIRDOM (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable Data, Operations and Models) Initiative has 8 years of experience of asset sharing and data infrastructure ranging across European programmes (SysMO and EraSysAPP ERANets), national initiatives (de.NBI, German Virtual Liver Network, UK SynBio centres) and PI's labs. It aims to support Systems and Synthetic Biology researchers with data and model management, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and sensitivity to asset sharing and credit anxiety.
This talk will use the FAIRDOM Initiative to discuss the FAIR management of data, SOPs, and models for Sys Bio, highlighting the challenges of and approaches to sharing, credit, citation and asset infrastructures in practice. I'll also highlight recent experiments in affecting sharing using behavioural interventions.
http://www.fair-dom.org
http://www.fairdomhub.org
http://www.seek4science.org
Presented at COMBINE 2016, Newcastle, 19 September.
http://co.mbine.org/events/COMBINE_2016
The presentation explores the trend towards a scholarly communication system that is friendly to machines. It presents 3 exhibits illustrating the trend and 1 exhibit illustrating inertia in the system. It makes the point that machine-actionability can be much easier achieved if content and metadata are available in Open Access and under a permissive Creative Commons license. It also observes that even with content and metadata openly available, new costs related to advanced tools to explore the scholarly record will emerge. Finally, it points at significant challenges regarding the persistence of the scholarly record in light of increasingly interconnected and actionable content and advanced tools to interact with it.
The slides were used for a plenary presentation at the LIBER 2011 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on June 30 2011.
Keynote presentation delivered at ELAG 2013 in Gent, Belgium, on May 29 2013. Discusses Research Objects and the relationship to work my team has been involved in during the past couple of years: OAI-ORE, Open Annotation, Memento.
Being Reproducible: SSBSS Summer School 2017Carole Goble
Lecture 2:
Being Reproducible: Models, Research Objects and R* Brouhaha
Reproducibility is a R* minefield, depending on whether you are testing for robustness (rerun), defence (repeat), certification (replicate), comparison (reproduce) or transferring between researchers (reuse). Different forms of "R" make different demands on the completeness, depth and portability of research. Sharing is another minefield raising concerns of credit and protection from sharp practices.
In practice the exchange, reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments is dependent on bundling and exchanging the experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows and so on along with the narrative. These "Research Objects" are not fixed, just as research is not “finished”: the codes fork, data is updated, algorithms are revised, workflows break, service updates are released. ResearchObject.org is an effort to systematically support more portable and reproducible research exchange.
In this talk I will explore these issues in more depth using the FAIRDOM Platform and its support for reproducible modelling. The talk will cover initiatives and technical issues, and raise social and cultural challenges.
FAIRDOM - FAIR Asset management and sharing experiences in Systems and Synthe...Carole Goble
Over the past 5 years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs and so forth. Don’t stop reading. Data management isn’t likely to win anyone a Nobel prize. But publications should be supported and accompanied by data, methods, procedures, etc. to assure reproducibility of results. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans as part of the proposal process for projects to be funded. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. The multi-component, multi-disciplinary nature of Systems Biology demands the interlinking and exchange of assets and the systematic recording
of metadata for their interpretation.
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship (http://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618) has been an effective rallying-cry for EU and USA Research Infrastructures. FAIRDOM (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable Data, Operations and Models) Initiative has 8 years of experience of asset sharing and data infrastructure ranging across European programmes (SysMO and EraSysAPP ERANets), national initiatives (de.NBI, German Virtual Liver Network, UK SynBio centres) and PI's labs. It aims to support Systems and Synthetic Biology researchers with data and model management, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and sensitivity to asset sharing and credit anxiety.
This talk will use the FAIRDOM Initiative to discuss the FAIR management of data, SOPs, and models for Sys Bio, highlighting the challenges of and approaches to sharing, credit, citation and asset infrastructures in practice. I'll also highlight recent experiments in affecting sharing using behavioural interventions.
http://www.fair-dom.org
http://www.fairdomhub.org
http://www.seek4science.org
Presented at COMBINE 2016, Newcastle, 19 September.
http://co.mbine.org/events/COMBINE_2016
Being FAIR: FAIR data and model management SSBSS 2017 Summer SchoolCarole Goble
Lecture 1:
Being FAIR: FAIR data and model management
In recent years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs, workflows. The “FAIR” (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship [1] have proved to be an effective rallying-cry. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. The multi-component, multi-disciplinary nature of Systems and Synthetic Biology demands the interlinking and exchange of assets and the systematic recording of metadata for their interpretation.
Our FAIRDOM project (http://www.fair-dom.org) supports Systems Biology research projects with their research data, methods and model management, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and sensitivity to asset sharing and credit anxiety. The FAIRDOM Platform has been installed by over 30 labs or projects. Our public, centrally hosted Asset Commons, the FAIRDOMHub.org, supports the outcomes of 50+ projects.
Now established as a grassroots association, FAIRDOM has over 8 years of experience of practical asset sharing and data infrastructure at the researcher coal-face ranging across European programmes (SysMO and ERASysAPP ERANets), national initiatives (Germany's de.NBI and Systems Medicine of the Liver; Norway's Digital Life) and European Research Infrastructures (ISBE) as well as in PI's labs and Centres such as the SynBioChem Centre at Manchester.
In this talk I will show explore how FAIRDOM has been designed to support Systems Biology projects and show examples of its configuration and use. I will also explore the technical and social challenges we face.
I will also refer to European efforts to support public archives for the life sciences. ELIXIR (http:// http://www.elixir-europe.org/) the European Research Infrastructure of 21 national nodes and a hub funded by national agreements to coordinate and sustain key data repositories and archives for the Life Science community, improve access to them and related tools, support training and create a platform for dataset interoperability. As the Head of the ELIXIR-UK Node and co-lead of the ELIXIR Interoperability Platform I will show how this work relates to your projects.
[1] Wilkinson et al, The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship Scientific Data 3, doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
What is Reproducibility? The R* brouhaha (and how Research Objects can help)Carole Goble
presented at 1st First International Workshop on Reproducible Open Science @ TPDL, 9 Sept 2016, Hannover, Germany
http://repscience2016.research-infrastructures.eu/
Specimen-level mining: bringing knowledge back 'home' to the Natural History ...Ross Mounce
A talk given at the Geological Society of London, UK on 2016/03/09 as part of the Lyell meeting on Palaeoinformatics. http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyell16 #lyell16
Findable Accessable Interoperable Reusable < data |models | SOPs | samples | articles| * >. FAIR is a mantra; a meme; a myth; a mystery; a moan. For the past 15 years I have been working on FAIR in a bunch of projects and initiatives in Life Science projects. Some are top-down like Life Science European Research Infrastructures ELIXIR and ISBE, and some are bottom-up, supporting research projects in Systems and Synthetic Biology (FAIRDOM), Biodiversity (BioVel), and Pharmacology (open PHACTS), for example. Some have become movements, like Bioschemas, the Common Workflow Language and Research Objects. Others focus on cross-cutting approaches in reproducibility, computational workflows, metadata representation and scholarly sharing & publication. In this talk I will relate a series of FAIRy tales. Some of them are Grimm. Some have happy endings. Who are the villains and who are the heroes? What are the morals we can draw from these stories?
NSF Workshop Data and Software Citation, 6-7 June 2016, Boston USA, Software Panel
FIndable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable Software and Data Citation: Europe, Research Objects, and BioSchemas.org
Reproducibility, Research Objects and Reality, Leiden 2016Carole Goble
Presented at the Leiden Bioscience Lecture, 24 November 2016, Reproducibility, Research Objects and Reality
Over the past 5 years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs, workflows. The “FAIR” (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship have proved to be an effective rallying-cry. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. It all sounds very laudable and straightforward. BUT…..
Reproducibility is a R* minefield, depending on whether you are testing for robustness (rerun), defence (repeat), certification (replicate), comparison (reproduce) or transferring between researchers (reuse). Different forms of "R" make different demands on the completeness, depth and portability of research. Sharing is another minefield raising concerns of credit and protection from sharp practices.
In practice the exchange, reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments is dependent on bundling and exchanging the experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows and so on along with the narrative. These "Research Objects" are not fixed, just as research is not “finished”: the codes fork, data is updated, algorithms are revised, workflows break, service updates are released. ResearchObject.org is an effort to systematically support more portable and reproducible research exchange
In this talk I will explore these issues in data-driven computational life sciences through the examples and stories from initiatives I am involved, and Leiden is involved in too including:
· FAIRDOM which has built a Commons for Systems and Synthetic Biology projects, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and efforts to affecting sharing practices using behavioural interventions
· ELIXIR, the EU Research Data Infrastructure, and its efforts to exchange workflows
· Bioschemas.org, an ELIXIR-NIH-Google effort to support the finding of assets.
Keynote: SemSci 2017: Enabling Open Semantic Science
1st International Workshop co-located with ISWC 2017, October 2017, Vienna, Austria,
https://semsci.github.io/semSci2017/
Abstract
We have all grown up with the research article and article collections (let’s call them libraries) as the prime means of scientific discourse. But research output is more than just the rhetorical narrative. The experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows, Standard Operating Procedures, samples and so on are the objects of research that enable reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments, and they too need to be examined and exchanged as research knowledge.
We can think of “Research Objects” as different types and as packages all the components of an investigation. If we stop thinking of publishing papers and start thinking of releasing Research Objects (software), then scholar exchange is a new game: ROs and their content evolve; they are multi-authored and their authorship evolves; they are a mix of virtual and embedded, and so on.
But first, some baby steps before we get carried away with a new vision of scholarly communication. Many journals (e.g. eLife, F1000, Elsevier) are just figuring out how to package together the supplementary materials of a paper. Data catalogues are figuring out how to virtually package multiple datasets scattered across many repositories to keep the integrated experimental context.
Research Objects [1] (http://researchobject.org/) is a framework by which the many, nested and contributed components of research can be packaged together in a systematic way, and their context, provenance and relationships richly described. The brave new world of containerisation provides the containers and Linked Data provides the metadata framework for the container manifest construction and profiles. It’s not just theory, but also in practice with examples in Systems Biology modelling, Bioinformatics computational workflows, and Health Informatics data exchange. I’ll talk about why and how we got here, the framework and examples, and what we need to do.
[1] Sean Bechhofer, Iain Buchan, David De Roure, Paolo Missier, John Ainsworth, Jiten Bhagat, Philip Couch, Don Cruickshank, Mark Delderfield, Ian Dunlop, Matthew Gamble, Danius Michaelides, Stuart Owen, David Newman, Shoaib Sufi, Carole Goble, Why linked data is not enough for scientists, In Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 599-611, ISSN 0167-739X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
A keynote given on the FAIR Data Principles at the FAIRplus Innovation and SME Forum, Hinxton Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK, 29 January 2020. The history of the principles, issues about the principles and speculations about the future
Research Objects: more than the sum of the partsCarole Goble
Workshop on Managing Digital Research Objects in an Expanding Science Ecosystem, 15 Nov 2017, Bethesda, USA
https://www.rd-alliance.org/managing-digital-research-objects-expanding-science-ecosystem
Research output is more than just the rhetorical narrative. The experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows, Standard Operating Procedures, samples and so on are the objects of research that enable reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments, and they too need to be examined and exchanged as research knowledge.
A first step is to think of Digital Research Objects as a broadening out to embrace these artefacts or assets of research. The next is to recognise that investigations use multiple, interlinked, evolving artefacts. Multiple datasets and multiple models support a study; each model is associated with datasets for construction, validation and prediction; an analytic pipeline has multiple codes and may be made up of nested sub-pipelines, and so on. Research Objects (http://researchobject.org/) is a framework by which the many, nested and contributed components of research can be packaged together in a systematic way, and their context, provenance and relationships richly described.
Results Vary: The Pragmatics of Reproducibility and Research Object FrameworksCarole Goble
Keynote presentation at the iConference 2015, Newport Beach, Los Angeles, 26 March 2015.
Results Vary: The Pragmatics of Reproducibility and Research Object Frameworks
http://ischools.org/the-iconference/
BEWARE: presentation includes hidden slides AND in situ build animations - best viewed by downloading.
FAIR Data, Operations and Model management for Systems Biology and Systems Me...Carole Goble
FAIR Data, Operations and Model management for Systems Biology and Systems Medicine Projects given at 1st Conference of the European Association of Systems Medicine, 26-28 October 2016, Berlin. the FAIRDOM project is described.
FAIR Workflows and Research Objects get a Workout Carole Goble
So, you want to build a pan-national digital space for bioscience data and methods? That works with a bunch of pre-existing data repositories and processing platforms? So you can share FAIR workflows and move them between services? Package them up with data and other stuff (or just package up data for that matter)? How? WorkflowHub (https://workflowhub.eu) and RO-Crate Research Objects (https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate) that’s how! A step towards FAIR Digital Objects gets a workout.
Presented at DataVerse Community Meeting 2021
These slides accompany the LDOW2010 paper "An HTTP-Based Versioning Mechanism for Linked Data". The paper is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3661. It describes how the combination of the Memento (Time Travel for the Web) framework, and a resource versioning approach that is aligned both with the Cool URI notion and with Tim Berners-Lee concept of Time-Generic and Time-Specific, yields the ability to collect current and prior versions of resource merely using "follow your nose" HTTP navigation. The proposed combination further extends the value of a URI, and allows the emergence of a novel realm of temporal Web applications.
This presentation introduces the Memento solution to allow time travel on the Web. Slides used at the first presentation about Memento at the Library of Congress, November 16 2009. Please consult the February 2010 slides (http://www.slideshare.net/hvdsomp/memento-updated-technical-details-february-2010) for up-to-date technical details. More info at http://www.mementoweb.org
Being FAIR: FAIR data and model management SSBSS 2017 Summer SchoolCarole Goble
Lecture 1:
Being FAIR: FAIR data and model management
In recent years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs, workflows. The “FAIR” (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship [1] have proved to be an effective rallying-cry. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. The multi-component, multi-disciplinary nature of Systems and Synthetic Biology demands the interlinking and exchange of assets and the systematic recording of metadata for their interpretation.
Our FAIRDOM project (http://www.fair-dom.org) supports Systems Biology research projects with their research data, methods and model management, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and sensitivity to asset sharing and credit anxiety. The FAIRDOM Platform has been installed by over 30 labs or projects. Our public, centrally hosted Asset Commons, the FAIRDOMHub.org, supports the outcomes of 50+ projects.
Now established as a grassroots association, FAIRDOM has over 8 years of experience of practical asset sharing and data infrastructure at the researcher coal-face ranging across European programmes (SysMO and ERASysAPP ERANets), national initiatives (Germany's de.NBI and Systems Medicine of the Liver; Norway's Digital Life) and European Research Infrastructures (ISBE) as well as in PI's labs and Centres such as the SynBioChem Centre at Manchester.
In this talk I will show explore how FAIRDOM has been designed to support Systems Biology projects and show examples of its configuration and use. I will also explore the technical and social challenges we face.
I will also refer to European efforts to support public archives for the life sciences. ELIXIR (http:// http://www.elixir-europe.org/) the European Research Infrastructure of 21 national nodes and a hub funded by national agreements to coordinate and sustain key data repositories and archives for the Life Science community, improve access to them and related tools, support training and create a platform for dataset interoperability. As the Head of the ELIXIR-UK Node and co-lead of the ELIXIR Interoperability Platform I will show how this work relates to your projects.
[1] Wilkinson et al, The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship Scientific Data 3, doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
What is Reproducibility? The R* brouhaha (and how Research Objects can help)Carole Goble
presented at 1st First International Workshop on Reproducible Open Science @ TPDL, 9 Sept 2016, Hannover, Germany
http://repscience2016.research-infrastructures.eu/
Specimen-level mining: bringing knowledge back 'home' to the Natural History ...Ross Mounce
A talk given at the Geological Society of London, UK on 2016/03/09 as part of the Lyell meeting on Palaeoinformatics. http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyell16 #lyell16
Findable Accessable Interoperable Reusable < data |models | SOPs | samples | articles| * >. FAIR is a mantra; a meme; a myth; a mystery; a moan. For the past 15 years I have been working on FAIR in a bunch of projects and initiatives in Life Science projects. Some are top-down like Life Science European Research Infrastructures ELIXIR and ISBE, and some are bottom-up, supporting research projects in Systems and Synthetic Biology (FAIRDOM), Biodiversity (BioVel), and Pharmacology (open PHACTS), for example. Some have become movements, like Bioschemas, the Common Workflow Language and Research Objects. Others focus on cross-cutting approaches in reproducibility, computational workflows, metadata representation and scholarly sharing & publication. In this talk I will relate a series of FAIRy tales. Some of them are Grimm. Some have happy endings. Who are the villains and who are the heroes? What are the morals we can draw from these stories?
NSF Workshop Data and Software Citation, 6-7 June 2016, Boston USA, Software Panel
FIndable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable Software and Data Citation: Europe, Research Objects, and BioSchemas.org
Reproducibility, Research Objects and Reality, Leiden 2016Carole Goble
Presented at the Leiden Bioscience Lecture, 24 November 2016, Reproducibility, Research Objects and Reality
Over the past 5 years we have seen a change in expectations for the management of all the outcomes of research – that is the “assets” of data, models, codes, SOPs, workflows. The “FAIR” (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship have proved to be an effective rallying-cry. Funding agencies expect data (and increasingly software) management retention and access plans. Journals are raising their expectations of the availability of data and codes for pre- and post- publication. It all sounds very laudable and straightforward. BUT…..
Reproducibility is a R* minefield, depending on whether you are testing for robustness (rerun), defence (repeat), certification (replicate), comparison (reproduce) or transferring between researchers (reuse). Different forms of "R" make different demands on the completeness, depth and portability of research. Sharing is another minefield raising concerns of credit and protection from sharp practices.
In practice the exchange, reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments is dependent on bundling and exchanging the experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows and so on along with the narrative. These "Research Objects" are not fixed, just as research is not “finished”: the codes fork, data is updated, algorithms are revised, workflows break, service updates are released. ResearchObject.org is an effort to systematically support more portable and reproducible research exchange
In this talk I will explore these issues in data-driven computational life sciences through the examples and stories from initiatives I am involved, and Leiden is involved in too including:
· FAIRDOM which has built a Commons for Systems and Synthetic Biology projects, with an emphasis on standards smuggled in by stealth and efforts to affecting sharing practices using behavioural interventions
· ELIXIR, the EU Research Data Infrastructure, and its efforts to exchange workflows
· Bioschemas.org, an ELIXIR-NIH-Google effort to support the finding of assets.
Keynote: SemSci 2017: Enabling Open Semantic Science
1st International Workshop co-located with ISWC 2017, October 2017, Vienna, Austria,
https://semsci.github.io/semSci2017/
Abstract
We have all grown up with the research article and article collections (let’s call them libraries) as the prime means of scientific discourse. But research output is more than just the rhetorical narrative. The experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows, Standard Operating Procedures, samples and so on are the objects of research that enable reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments, and they too need to be examined and exchanged as research knowledge.
We can think of “Research Objects” as different types and as packages all the components of an investigation. If we stop thinking of publishing papers and start thinking of releasing Research Objects (software), then scholar exchange is a new game: ROs and their content evolve; they are multi-authored and their authorship evolves; they are a mix of virtual and embedded, and so on.
But first, some baby steps before we get carried away with a new vision of scholarly communication. Many journals (e.g. eLife, F1000, Elsevier) are just figuring out how to package together the supplementary materials of a paper. Data catalogues are figuring out how to virtually package multiple datasets scattered across many repositories to keep the integrated experimental context.
Research Objects [1] (http://researchobject.org/) is a framework by which the many, nested and contributed components of research can be packaged together in a systematic way, and their context, provenance and relationships richly described. The brave new world of containerisation provides the containers and Linked Data provides the metadata framework for the container manifest construction and profiles. It’s not just theory, but also in practice with examples in Systems Biology modelling, Bioinformatics computational workflows, and Health Informatics data exchange. I’ll talk about why and how we got here, the framework and examples, and what we need to do.
[1] Sean Bechhofer, Iain Buchan, David De Roure, Paolo Missier, John Ainsworth, Jiten Bhagat, Philip Couch, Don Cruickshank, Mark Delderfield, Ian Dunlop, Matthew Gamble, Danius Michaelides, Stuart Owen, David Newman, Shoaib Sufi, Carole Goble, Why linked data is not enough for scientists, In Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 599-611, ISSN 0167-739X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
A keynote given on the FAIR Data Principles at the FAIRplus Innovation and SME Forum, Hinxton Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK, 29 January 2020. The history of the principles, issues about the principles and speculations about the future
Research Objects: more than the sum of the partsCarole Goble
Workshop on Managing Digital Research Objects in an Expanding Science Ecosystem, 15 Nov 2017, Bethesda, USA
https://www.rd-alliance.org/managing-digital-research-objects-expanding-science-ecosystem
Research output is more than just the rhetorical narrative. The experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows, Standard Operating Procedures, samples and so on are the objects of research that enable reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments, and they too need to be examined and exchanged as research knowledge.
A first step is to think of Digital Research Objects as a broadening out to embrace these artefacts or assets of research. The next is to recognise that investigations use multiple, interlinked, evolving artefacts. Multiple datasets and multiple models support a study; each model is associated with datasets for construction, validation and prediction; an analytic pipeline has multiple codes and may be made up of nested sub-pipelines, and so on. Research Objects (http://researchobject.org/) is a framework by which the many, nested and contributed components of research can be packaged together in a systematic way, and their context, provenance and relationships richly described.
Results Vary: The Pragmatics of Reproducibility and Research Object FrameworksCarole Goble
Keynote presentation at the iConference 2015, Newport Beach, Los Angeles, 26 March 2015.
Results Vary: The Pragmatics of Reproducibility and Research Object Frameworks
http://ischools.org/the-iconference/
BEWARE: presentation includes hidden slides AND in situ build animations - best viewed by downloading.
FAIR Data, Operations and Model management for Systems Biology and Systems Me...Carole Goble
FAIR Data, Operations and Model management for Systems Biology and Systems Medicine Projects given at 1st Conference of the European Association of Systems Medicine, 26-28 October 2016, Berlin. the FAIRDOM project is described.
FAIR Workflows and Research Objects get a Workout Carole Goble
So, you want to build a pan-national digital space for bioscience data and methods? That works with a bunch of pre-existing data repositories and processing platforms? So you can share FAIR workflows and move them between services? Package them up with data and other stuff (or just package up data for that matter)? How? WorkflowHub (https://workflowhub.eu) and RO-Crate Research Objects (https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate) that’s how! A step towards FAIR Digital Objects gets a workout.
Presented at DataVerse Community Meeting 2021
These slides accompany the LDOW2010 paper "An HTTP-Based Versioning Mechanism for Linked Data". The paper is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3661. It describes how the combination of the Memento (Time Travel for the Web) framework, and a resource versioning approach that is aligned both with the Cool URI notion and with Tim Berners-Lee concept of Time-Generic and Time-Specific, yields the ability to collect current and prior versions of resource merely using "follow your nose" HTTP navigation. The proposed combination further extends the value of a URI, and allows the emergence of a novel realm of temporal Web applications.
This presentation introduces the Memento solution to allow time travel on the Web. Slides used at the first presentation about Memento at the Library of Congress, November 16 2009. Please consult the February 2010 slides (http://www.slideshare.net/hvdsomp/memento-updated-technical-details-february-2010) for up-to-date technical details. More info at http://www.mementoweb.org
Presentation for PIDapalooza 2016. PIDs need to be used to achieve their intended persistence. Our research (reported at WWW2016, see http://arxiv.org/1602.09102) found that a disturbing percentage of references to papers that have DOIs actually use the landing page HTTP URI instead of the DOI HTTP URI. The problem is likely related to tools used for collecting references such as bookmarks and reference managers. These select the landing page URI instead of the DOI URI because the former is what's available in the address bar. It can safely be assumed that the same problem exists for other types of PIDs. The net result is that the true potential of PIDs is not realized. In order to ameliorate this problem we propose a Signposting pattern for PIDs (http://signposting.org/identifier/). It consists of adding a Link header to HTTP HEAD/GET responses for all resources identified by a DOI, including the landing page and content resources such as "the PDF" and "the dataset". The Link header contains a link, which points with the "identifier" relation type to the DOI HTTP URI. When such a link is available, tools can automatically discover and use the DOI URI instead of the other URIs (landing page, PDF, dataset) associated with the DOI-identified object.
Slides used for a presentation at the CNI 2013 Fall meeting. Discusses the problem domain of the Hiberlink project, a collaboration between the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the University of Edinburgh, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Hiberlink investigates reference rot in web-based scholarly communication.
As the scholarly communication system evolves to become natively web-based and starts supporting the communication of a wide variety of objects, the manner in which its essential functions – registration, certification, awareness, archiving - are fulfilled co-evolves. This presentation focuses on the nature of the archival function based on a perspective of the future scholarly communication infrastructure. This presentation, prepared for a meeting in June 2014, is based on and updates a previous one that was prepared for a January 2014 meeting. The latter is available at http://www.slideshare.net/atreloar/scholarly-archiveofthefuture
Memento: Big Leaps Towards Seamless Navigation of the Web of the PastHerbert Van de Sompel
These slides provide an explanation of the Memento Framework (time travel for the Web) from the perspective of resource versioning. It also details progress that has been made with deploying the framework since it was first introduced in November 2009, including standardization, development of tools, and advocacy. In addition, it touches upon new challenges (discovery, branding) and announces plans to make transactional Web archiving software available in the course of 2011.
DBpedia Archive using Memento, Triple Pattern Fragments, and HDTHerbert Van de Sompel
DBpedia is the Linked Data version of Wikipedia. Starting in 2007, several DBpedia dumps have been made available for download. In 2010, the Research Library at the Los Alamos National Laboratory used these dumps to deploy a Memento-compliant DBpedia Archive, in order to demonstrate the applicability and appeal of accessing temporal versions of Linked Data sets using the Memento “Time Travel for the Web” protocol. The archive supported datetime negotiation to access various temporal versions of RDF descriptions of DBpedia subject URIs.
In a recent collaboration with the iMinds Group of Ghent University, the DBpedia Archive received a major overhaul. The initial MongoDB storage approach, which was unable to handle increasingly large DBpedia dumps, was replaced by HDT, the Binary RDF Representation for Publication and Exchange. And, in addition to the existing subject URI access point, Triple Pattern Fragments access, as proposed by the Linked Data Fragments project, was added. This allows datetime negotiation for URIs that identify RDF triples that match subject/predicate/object patterns. To add this powerful capability, native Memento support was added to the Linked Data Fragments Server of Ghent University.
In this talk, we will include a brief refresher of Memento, and will cover Linked Data Fragments, Triple Pattern Fragments, and HDT in more detail. We will share lessons learned from this effort and demo the new DBpedia Archive, which, at this point, holds over 5 billion RDF triples.
Presentation at the Colloquium Research Information Systems and Science Classifications: Revisiting the NARCIS Classification, Museum Meermanno, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 28, 2018.
A Practical Ontology for the Large-Scale Modeling of Scholarly Artifacts and ...Marko Rodriguez
The large-scale analysis of scholarly artifact usage is constrained primarily by current practices in usage data archiving, privacy issues concerned with the dissemination of usage data, and the lack of a practical ontology for modeling the usage domain. As a remedy to the third constraint, this article presents a scholarly ontology that was engineered to represent those classes for which large-scale bibliographic and usage data exists, supports usage research, and whose instantiation is scalable to the order of 50 million articles along with their associated artifacts (e.g. authors and journals) and an accompanying 1 billion usage events. The real world instantiation of the presented abstract ontology is a semantic network model of the scholarly community which lends the scholarly process to statistical analysis and computational support. We present the ontology, discuss its instantiation, and provide some example inference rules for calculating various scholarly artifact metrics.
Visual exploration of scientific literature using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorerNees Jan van Eck
Presentation at the International Conference on ICT enhanced Social Sciences and Humanities 2020, July 1, 2020.
It is essential for researchers to have an up-to-date understanding of the literature in their research field. However, keeping up with all relevant literature is highly time consuming. Bibliometric visualizations can support this task. These visualizations provide intuitive overviews of the literature in a research field, enabling researchers to obtain a better understanding of the structure and development of a field and to get an impression of the most significant contributions made in the field.
In this talk, I will give an introduction to two software tools for bibliometric visualization: VOSviewer (www.vosviewer.com) and CitNetExplorer (www.citnetexplorer.nl). VOSviewer is a popular tool for visualizing bibliometric networks of publications, authors, journals, and keywords. CitNetExplorer is a tool for the visualization and analysis of citation networks of scientific publications. I will pay special attention to applications of VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer in the social sciences and humanities, focusing in particular on the use of advanced text mining, network analysis, and visualization techniques for analyzing large amounts of textual data.
Describes changes in scholarly publishing, and explains different options for open access. Tools for measuring journal impact such as Journal Citation Reports, SCImago and Ulrichsweb are highlighted and bibliometrics are described. Some altmetrics are considered
In this deck from the 2014 HPC User Forum in Seattle, Jack Collins from the National Cancer Institute presents: Genomes to Structures to Function: The Role of HPC.
Watch the video presentation: http://wp.me/p3RLHQ-d28
How to use science maps to navigate large information spaces? What is the lin...Andrea Scharnhorst
A. Scharnhorst (2016) Wie können Wissenschaftskarten zur Suche in grossen Informationsräumen eingesetzt werden? How to use science maps to navigate large information spaces? What is the link between science maps and predictive models of science? Invited lecture Fraunhofer-Institut für Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Trendanalysen, Euskirchen, Germany, December 7, 2016
Presentation at the Data Science seminar at the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, December 7, 2018.
The evolution to network and computational paradigm has gone through a amazing phase of
expansion and development. The growth curve was indeed very steep in many major domains. The
advent of Cloud computing & Machine learning has enhanced the implementation in application area like
Bioinformatics. With huge application-domain scope Cloud computing has emerged as a special area of
interest for many bioinformatics researchers. Research is being done on different aspects of Cloud
computing with bioinformatics for identifying areas of improvement and their respective remedies for
living beings. Specially the cloud computing are acting very helpful for identifying H1N1 virus in human.
H1N1 is an infectious virus which, when spread affects a large volume of the population. It
spreads very easily and has a high death rate. Similarly cloud computing doing good job for detection of
Hypertension, Diabetics, Cancer and Heart patient with software as a service, so the development of
healthcare support systems using cloud computing is emerging as an effective solution with the
benefits of better quality of service, reduced costs. This paper, provide an effective review towards cloud
computing important effort in a field of bioinformatics.
Presentation about reference rot given at the Complexity Science Hub in Vienna, November 2021.
Links to web resources frequently break (link rot), and linked content can change at unpredictable rates (content drift). These dynamics of the Web are detrimental when references to web resources provide evidence or supporting information.
This presentation will report on research that assessed the extent of these problems for links to web resources in scholarly literature, by using three vast corpora of publications and a range of public web archives. It will also describe the Robust Link approach that offers a proactive, uniform, and machine-actionable way to combat link rot and content drift. Finally, it will introduce the Robustify web service and API that was devised to generate links that remain functional over time, paying special attention to challenges related to deploying infrastructure that is required to be long lasting.
Researcher Pod: Scholarly Communication Using the Decentralized WebHerbert Van de Sompel
The presentation provides an overview of the motivation and direction of the Mellon-funded Researcher Pod project that investigates technical aspects of scholarly communication in a decentralized web setting.
Presentation for a workshop about persistent identifiers organized by the Royal Library of The Netherlands and DANS. Highlights the non-trivial commitments required of all parties involved in persistent identifier systems to actually keep links based on persistent identifiers ... err ... persistent.
Various FAIR criteria pertaining to machine interaction with scholarly artifacts can commonly be addressed by means of repository-wide affordances that are uniformly provided for all hosted artifacts rather than through artifact-specific interventions. If various repository platforms provide such affordances in an interoperable manner, devising tools - for both human and machine use - that leverage them becomes easier.
My involvement, over the years, in a range of interoperability efforts has brought the insight that two factors strongly influence adoption: addressing a burning issue and delivering a KISS solution to tackle it. Undoubtedly, FAIR and FAIR DOs are burning issues. FAIR Signposting <https://signposting.org/FAIR/> is an ad-hoc repository interoperability effort that squarely fits in this problem space and that purposely specifies a KISS solution, hoping to inspire wide adoption.
Registration / Certification Interoperability Architecture (overlay peer-review)Herbert Van de Sompel
Presentation for the COAR meeting on Overlay Peer-Review held at INRIA, Paris, France. It provides overall context regarding a scholarly communication system in which the core functions of scholarly communication (registration, certification, awareness, archiving) are implemented in a decoupled manner and whereby each function can simultaneously be fulfilled by different parties, potentially in different ways. It shows how notifications can be used to achieve loosely coupled, point-to-point interoperability in such an environment, zooming in on interoperability between registration and certification aka interoperability between repositories and overlay peer-review services.
Slides used for a keynote presentation at the VIVO 2019 Conference in Podgorica, Montenegro.
Abstract: The invitation to present a keynote at the VIVO Conference and the goal of the VIVO platform, as stated on the DuraSpace site, to create an integrated record of the scholarly work of an organisation reminded me of various efforts that I have been involved in over the past years that had similar goals. EgoSystem (2014) attempted to gather information about postdocs that had left the organisation, leaving little or no contact details behind. Autoload (2017), an operational service, discovers papers by organisational researchers in order to upload them in the institutional repository. myresearch.institute (2018), an experiment that is still in progress, discovers artefacts that researchers deposit in web productivity portals and subsequently archives them. More recently, I have been involved in thinking about the future of NARCIS, a portal that provides an overview of research productivity in The Netherlands. The approach taken in all these efforts share a characteristic motivated by a desire to devise scalable and sustainable solutions: let machines rather than humans do the work. In this talk, I will provide an overview of these efforts, their motivations, the challenges involved, and the nature of success (if any).
Presentation for PIDapalooza 2019, Dublin, Ireland.
The Scholarly Orphans project, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, explores technical approaches aimed at capturing and archiving scholarly artifacts that researchers deposit in web productivity portals as a means to collaborate and communicate with their peers. These artifacts are not collected by other frameworks aimed at archiving the scholarly record (e.g., LOCKSS, Portico, Institutional Repositories) and are only incidentally captured by web archives. The project explores an institution-driven approach inspired by web archiving. To demonstrate the ongoing thinking, the project has devised an experimental automated pipeline that continuously discovers, captures, and archives artifacts. These are created by actual researchers who, for the purpose of the experiment, were virtually enlisted in a fictive research institution. A portal at myresearch.institute provides an overview of the artifacts that were discovered and provides access to archived versions stored in both an institutional and a cross-institutional archive. The set-up leverages a range of technologies that share a flavor of persistence: Memento, Memento Tracer, Robust Links, Signposting.
As a memento of my last week of working at LANL, I put together a slide deck that provides an overview of major efforts conducted during the time I was there.
Presentation given at EuropeanaTech 2018 in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Provides a summary of insights gained from working for about a decade on challenges related to temporal aspects of the web, persistence.
"Scholarly Communication: Deconstruct and Decentralize" was presented at the Fall 2017 Meeting of the Coalition for Networked Information. It explores working towards a Scholarly Commons by applying decentralized web ideas to scholarly communication.
Looks at hyperlinks from the perspective of a managed collection of resources for which link persistence/integrity is considered a quality of service concern. Distinguishes between links into other managed collections and to the web at large. Considers link rot and content drift.
This slide deck provides an overview of proposals to use HTTP Links as a means to address some long standing problems related to scholarly resources on the web.
This slide deck provides an overview of proposals to use HTTP Links as a means to address some long standing problems related to scholarly resources on the web.
These slides go with the paper "Reminiscing About 15 Years of Interoperability Efforts" which is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/november2015-vandesompel
Slides were used for a presentation at the Fall 2015 Membership Meeting of the Coalition for Networked Information.
This presentation looks back at several efforts, conducted in the past fifteen years, aimed at establishing interoperability for web-based scholarly communication. It tries to characterize the perspectives/approaches taken by these efforts and, based upon that, proposes an HATEOS-based approach to interlink scholarly nodes on the web. This was first presented at the Research Data Alliance meeting in Paris, France, September 22 2015.
Extended version of slides presented at the "404/File Not Found" symposium held at Georgetown University on October 24 2014, see http://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/404/ . The presentation provides a brief overview of the link/reference rot problem and then discusses three complimentary strategies to combat it: Pro-actively capturing web resources that are linked from a seed collection; Referencing the captures by means of annotated links; Accessing the captures using Memento infrastructure.
This presentation introduces ResourceSync, a specification aimed to enable web-based synchronization of resources. The specification is the result of a collaboration between NISO and the Open Archives Initiative funded by the Sloan Foundation and JISC. The proposed resource synchronization approach is based on several existing specifications (e.g. Sitemaps, PubSubHubbub, well-known URI) and is aligned with common architectural principles (e.g. REST, follow your nose).
A 15 minute video version of these slides is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASQ4jMYytsA
This presentation provides an overview of the Memento "Time Travel for the Web" framework that is aligned with the stable version of the Memento protocol, specified in RFC 7089.
The slides were used to accompany an overview of the outcomes of the ResourceSync project at the 2014 Spring Membership Meeting of the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI).
The launch of ResourceSync, a joint project of the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, was motivated by the ubiquitous need to synchronize resources for applications in the realm of cultural heritage and research communication. After an initial problem definition and scoping phase, the project has designed, specified, and tested a framework for web-based synchronization that is based on SiteMaps, a protocol widely used by web servers to advertise the resources they make available to search engines for indexing. This choice allows repositories to address both search engine optimization and resource synchronization needs using the same technology.
The ResourceSync framework specifies various modular capabilities that a repository can support in order to allow third party systems to remain synchronized with its evolving resources. For example, a Resource List provides an inventory of resources whereas a Change List details resources that were created, deleted or updated during a given temporal interval. Support for capabilities can be combined in order to meet local or community requirements. The framework specifies capabilities that require a third party to recurrently poll for up-to-date information about a repositories’ resources but also publish/subscribe capabilities that keep third parties informed about changes through notifications, thereby significantly reducing synchronization latency.
Persistent Identifiers and the Web: The Need for an Unambiguous MappingHerbert Van de Sompel
Presentation given at the International Digital Curation Conference in San Francisco, February 26 2014. Highlights the lack of machine-actionability of persistent identifiers assigned to scholarly communication assets. Proposes an approach to address the issue that meets requirements that take into account the changing nature of web based research communication. A draft paper provides more details: http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/papers/Papers/2014/IDCC2014_vandesompel.pdf
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Mission to Decommission: Importance of Decommissioning Products to Increase E...
MESUR: Making sense and use of usage data
1. MESUR Making Use and Sense of Scholarly Usage Data <http://www.mesur.org> Johan Bollen - [email_address] Herbert Van de Sompel - herbertv@lanl.gov Digital Library Research & Prototyping Team Research Library Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA Acknowledgements: Marko A. Rodriguez (LANL), Ryan Chute (LANL), Lyudmila L. Balakireva (LANL), Aric Hagberg (LANL), Luis Bettencourt (LANL) The MESUR research was funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
22. Metrics Computed for Usage and Citation Data Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R. 2009 A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2183 Submitted to PLoS ONE
23. Citation Network Rankings 2004 Impact Factor value journal 1 49.794 CANCER 2 47.400 ANNU REV IMMUNOL 3 44.016 NEW ENGL J MED 4 33.456 ANNU REV BIOCHEM 5 31.694 NAT REV CANCER Citation Pagerank value journal 1 0.0116 SCIENCE 2 0.0111 J BIOL CHEM 3 0.0108 NATURE 4 0.0101 PNAS 5 0.006 PHYS REV LETT betweenness value journal 1 0.076 PNAS 2 0.072 SCIENCE 3 0.059 NATURE 4 0.039 LECT NOTES COMPUT SC 5 0.017 LANCET Closeness value journal 1 7.02e-05 PNAS 2 6.72e-05 LECT NOTES COMPUT SC 3 6.43e-05 NATURE 4 6.37e-05 SCIENCE 5 6.37e-05 J BIOL CHEM In-Degree value journal 1 3448 SCIENCE 2 3182 NATURE 3 2913 PNAS 4 2190 LANCET 5 2160 NEW ENGL J MED In-degree entropy Value journal 1 9.849 LANCET 2 9.748 SCIENCE 3 9.701 NEW ENGL J MED 4 9.611 NATURE 5 9.526 JAMA
24. Usage Network Rankings In-Degree value journal 1 4195 SCIENCE 2 4019 NATURE 3 3562 PNAS 4 2438 J BIOL CHEM 5 2432 LNCS In-degree entropy Value journal 1 9.364 MED HYPOTHESES 2 9.152 PNAS 3 9.027 LIFE SCI 4 8.939 LANCET 5 8.858 INT J BIOCHEM CELL B betweenness value journal 1 0.035 SCIENCE 2 0.032 NATURE 3 0.020 PNAS 4 0.017 LNCS 5 0.006 LANCET Closeness value journal 1 0.670 SCIENCE 2 0.665 NATURE 3 0.644 PNAS 4 0.591 LNCS 5 0.587 BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO Pagerank value journal 1 0.0016 SCIENCE 2 0.0015 NATURE 3 0.0013 PNAS 4 0.0010 LNCS 5 0.0008 J BIOL CHEM 2004 Impact Factor value journal 1 49.794 CANCER 2 47.400 ANNU REV IMMUNOL 3 44.016 NEW ENGL J MED 4 33.456 ANNU REV BIOCHEM 5 31.694 NAT REV CANCER
35. Publications related to MESUR Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Aric Hagberg, Luis Bettencourt, Ryan Chute, Marko A. Rodriguez, Lyudmila Balakireva. Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS One, March 2009. Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Aric HagBerg, Ryan Chute. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. arXiv.org/abs/0902.2183 Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, and Marko A. Rodriguez. Towards usage-based impact metrics: first results from the MESUR project. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Pittsburgh, June 2008 Marko A. Rodriguez, Johan Bollen and Herbert Van de Sompel. A Practical Ontology for the Large-Scale Modeling of Scholarly Artifacts and their Usage, In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, June 2007 Johan Bollen and Herbert Van de Sompel. Usage Impact Factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. (cs.DL/0610154) Johan Bollen and Herbert Van de Sompel. An architecture for the aggregation and analysis of scholarly usage data. In Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL2006), pages 298 - 307, June 2006. Johan Bollen and Herbert Van de Sompel. Mapping the structure of science through usage. Scientometrics, 69(2), 2006. Johan Bollen, Marko A. Rodriguez, and Herbert Van de Sompel. Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), December 2006 (arxiv.org:cs.DL/0601030) Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan Smith, and Rick Luce. Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing and Management, 41(6):1419 - 1440, 2005.