The document describes a sepsis innovation portfolio comprised of therapeutics, diagnostics, devices, and digital health solutions to transform sepsis diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. It summarizes several projects, including a portable monitoring system for early sepsis detection using a sensor ring, a rapid diagnostic panel to detect endothelial cell damage and blood biomarkers of sepsis, an ultrasound device to non-invasively monitor lung function and fluid status, a point-of-care diagnostic using whole blood redox measurements, an immunotherapy using interleukin-15 to boost the immune response, and a diagnostic to directly detect microbial DNA and identify antibiotic resistance within 3 hours. The portfolio aims to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
sepsis stategy to improve outcome by easy way to remember "2P3R" Prevention,Recognition, Resuscitation, Refer to close monitor and Palliative. This set of slide show the way to early detection, early resuscitation and how to monitor septic patients by easy way to classified the septic patients.
This document discusses sepsis, including definitions, causes, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. It defines sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Mortality from sepsis is high and increasing. Common causes are bacterial and fungal infections. The pathophysiology involves an excessive host immune response. Diagnosis requires identifying an infection and assessing for organ dysfunction. Management involves early antibiotic treatment, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor support if needed, and treating any infection source. Performance improvement efforts focusing on timely treatment can improve outcomes.
This document discusses the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis, specifically the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. It finds that while guidelines can be helpful, they are often not followed by more than 50% of clinicians. The document presents strategies to improve adherence through performance improvement initiatives at one medical center. These include identifying gaps in timely screening, diagnosis, initial resuscitation, antibiotics, and addressing goals of care. The focus is on both early identification and treatment of sepsis as well as the critical role of nurses in performance improvement efforts to optimize outcomes for patients with sepsis.
This document discusses sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis occurs when an infection leads to a dysregulated inflammatory response that damages remote organs. Early sepsis may involve infection or bacteremia without organ dysfunction. Septic shock is a type of distributive shock characterized by circulatory and metabolic abnormalities in addition to sepsis. Untreated, sepsis can progress to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death. Prompt diagnosis and treatment including antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and vasopressors are important for improving outcomes in sepsis and septic shock.
Sepsis is a serious condition that can lead to death if not properly recognized and treated quickly. The UK Sepsis Trust works to increase awareness of sepsis and improve sepsis care and outcomes in the UK. While progress has been made in some areas, compliance with best practices like administering antibiotics within an hour remains low. The Trust advocates for standardized protocols, improved communication between primary and secondary care, source control, and ensuring antimicrobial expertise is available 24/7 to help tackle sepsis.
A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis20160403Aalisheer
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The definition emphasizes the nonhomeostatic host response and potential lethality beyond uncomplicated infection. Organ dysfunction is identified as an acute change in the SOFA score of 2 points or more due to infection. A SOFA score of 2 or more reflects a 10% mortality risk. Sepsis can be identified at the bedside using qSOFA criteria of altered mentation, respiratory rate of 22/min or greater, or systolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg or less. Septic shock involves profound circulatory and cellular abnormalities and mortality over 40%, defined as sepsis-induced hypotension requiring vasopress
This document provides guidelines for the management of sepsis from 2016 and 2018 updates. It begins with discussing the historical perspectives on defining and treating sepsis. Key points include:
- Sepsis and septic shock definitions were revised in 2016 to focus on life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection.
- Screening tools like SOFA and qSOFA are recommended to help identify and monitor sepsis severity. The SOFA score evaluates organ dysfunction in six organ systems while qSOFA is for non-ICU patients.
- The initial management of sepsis focuses on rapid treatment within the first hour of recognition, including measuring lactate, blood cultures, antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and
sepsis stategy to improve outcome by easy way to remember "2P3R" Prevention,Recognition, Resuscitation, Refer to close monitor and Palliative. This set of slide show the way to early detection, early resuscitation and how to monitor septic patients by easy way to classified the septic patients.
This document discusses sepsis, including definitions, causes, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. It defines sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Mortality from sepsis is high and increasing. Common causes are bacterial and fungal infections. The pathophysiology involves an excessive host immune response. Diagnosis requires identifying an infection and assessing for organ dysfunction. Management involves early antibiotic treatment, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor support if needed, and treating any infection source. Performance improvement efforts focusing on timely treatment can improve outcomes.
This document discusses the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis, specifically the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. It finds that while guidelines can be helpful, they are often not followed by more than 50% of clinicians. The document presents strategies to improve adherence through performance improvement initiatives at one medical center. These include identifying gaps in timely screening, diagnosis, initial resuscitation, antibiotics, and addressing goals of care. The focus is on both early identification and treatment of sepsis as well as the critical role of nurses in performance improvement efforts to optimize outcomes for patients with sepsis.
This document discusses sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis occurs when an infection leads to a dysregulated inflammatory response that damages remote organs. Early sepsis may involve infection or bacteremia without organ dysfunction. Septic shock is a type of distributive shock characterized by circulatory and metabolic abnormalities in addition to sepsis. Untreated, sepsis can progress to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death. Prompt diagnosis and treatment including antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and vasopressors are important for improving outcomes in sepsis and septic shock.
Sepsis is a serious condition that can lead to death if not properly recognized and treated quickly. The UK Sepsis Trust works to increase awareness of sepsis and improve sepsis care and outcomes in the UK. While progress has been made in some areas, compliance with best practices like administering antibiotics within an hour remains low. The Trust advocates for standardized protocols, improved communication between primary and secondary care, source control, and ensuring antimicrobial expertise is available 24/7 to help tackle sepsis.
A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis20160403Aalisheer
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The definition emphasizes the nonhomeostatic host response and potential lethality beyond uncomplicated infection. Organ dysfunction is identified as an acute change in the SOFA score of 2 points or more due to infection. A SOFA score of 2 or more reflects a 10% mortality risk. Sepsis can be identified at the bedside using qSOFA criteria of altered mentation, respiratory rate of 22/min or greater, or systolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg or less. Septic shock involves profound circulatory and cellular abnormalities and mortality over 40%, defined as sepsis-induced hypotension requiring vasopress
This document provides guidelines for the management of sepsis from 2016 and 2018 updates. It begins with discussing the historical perspectives on defining and treating sepsis. Key points include:
- Sepsis and septic shock definitions were revised in 2016 to focus on life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection.
- Screening tools like SOFA and qSOFA are recommended to help identify and monitor sepsis severity. The SOFA score evaluates organ dysfunction in six organ systems while qSOFA is for non-ICU patients.
- The initial management of sepsis focuses on rapid treatment within the first hour of recognition, including measuring lactate, blood cultures, antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and
Sepsis is a medical emergency that requires rapid identification and treatment to stop the sepsis cascade and save lives. The most effective method for improving survival and outcomes is to quickly diagnose sepsis, immediately implement treatment with antibiotics and fluid resuscitation, and use an organized approach outlined in best practice guidelines and quality measures. Key aspects of treatment include measuring lactic acid levels, obtaining blood cultures, administering broad spectrum antibiotics, and fluid boluses for hypotension or elevated lactate, in order to restore aerobic metabolism and perfusion.
The document provides an update on sepsis, including its history, definitions, pathophysiology, management, and future directions. It summarizes the evolution of sepsis definitions from 1991 to Sepsis-3 in 2016. The Sepsis-3 definition defines sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It also outlines recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign for early management of sepsis including initial resuscitation and antimicrobial therapy.
The document discusses the case of a 51-year-old man presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock. It outlines his initial treatment including IV fluids, antibiotics, and vasopressors. Further workup revealed a hepatic abscess which was drained surgically. The patient eventually recovered after 10 days of targeted antibiotic therapy guided by cultures. The document also reviews key literature on defining sepsis, early management principles like early goal-directed therapy, and optimization of oxygen delivery through fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes, and blood transfusions.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues. Globally, sepsis kills about 8 million people annually. Early recognition and treatment are key to improving outcomes. The first hours after diagnosis are especially critical, as mortality increases by about 8% every hour that antibiotics are delayed. Prompt administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation can significantly reduce mortality from sepsis.
1) The document defines sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock and provides diagnostic criteria. It discusses initial resuscitation goals for the first 6 hours including fluid administration, vasopressors, and ScvO2/lactate monitoring.
2) Management recommendations are provided for antimicrobial therapy, source control, fluid therapy, vasopressors, blood products, glucose control, and other areas. Bundle elements are outlined to be completed within 3 and 6 hours of diagnosis.
3) Guidelines include level of evidence ratings and discuss evidence from studies on topics like fluid resuscitation, vasopressor use, and ventilator management for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
1) The document discusses CMS's new sepsis core measures that took effect in October 2015 and are aimed at improving early management of sepsis through compliance with sepsis bundles.
2) It provides an overview of the definitions for severe sepsis and septic shock that determine when the core measure time clocks begin. The measures require drawing lactate and blood cultures, administering antibiotics and fluids, and reassessing patients within 3 and 6 hours of presentation.
3) Successful implementation of the sepsis core measures requires standardized identification processes, evidence-based treatment adhering to bundles, and ongoing process improvements including engaging physicians, identifying gaps, and facilitating a culture of protocol compliance.
A 60-year-old female with diabetes and hypertension presented with altered mental status and fever for 3 days. On examination, she had a high heart rate, low blood pressure, high respiratory rate, and high blood glucose. Initial lab work showed high lactate, low platelets, and signs of infection on urine and blood tests. This patient is showing signs of sepsis such as altered mental status, hypotension, and elevated lactate. The initial response should be rapid fluid resuscitation with crystalloids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and vasopressors if needed to maintain blood pressure. Close monitoring and treatment based on sepsis guidelines is needed in the first critical hours to prevent further organ dysfunction.
Salon a 14 kasim 09.00 10.15 arzu topeli̇ i̇ski̇t-ingtyfngnc
This document summarizes updates in sepsis epidemiology, diagnosis, and management based on recent guidelines and studies. It notes that sepsis affects millions worldwide each year and is a leading cause of death in hospitals. While guidelines over the past decade have aimed to increase early diagnosis and treatment, compliance remains low and an expected decrease in mortality has not been observed. Ongoing research continues to investigate new diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents for sepsis.
This document provides an update to the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock. A consensus committee of 55 international experts from 25 organizations reviewed evidence and developed recommendations. They addressed 93 statements, including 32 strong recommendations, 39 weak recommendations, and 18 best practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. The guidelines are intended to improve outcomes for patients with sepsis or septic shock in a hospital setting, though clinical judgment is still required given variability in individual patients.
Sepsis is SIRS which is due to an infection
Sepsis is a major cause of mortality, killing approximately 1,400 people worldwide every day
Everyone has the potential to get sepsis
Easy to identify – we know what we’re looking for
Tools – observations scoring, clinical acumen, experience
Sepsis Screening Tool
The document summarizes the key findings and conclusions from a task force that updated the definitions of sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). The task force convened experts who engaged in iterative discussions to address limitations of previous definitions. The new definitions define sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, and septic shock as a subset of sepsis with profound circulatory and metabolic abnormalities. A quick bedside score (qSOFA) was also developed to help identify patients likely to face poor outcomes.
This document discusses the history and issues with existing definitions of sepsis. It summarizes that the 1992 consensus definitions of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were an improvement but lacked specificity. Later studies found that the SIRS criteria were too sensitive and nonspecific, missing around 12% of cases. There have been calls to revisit the definitions as understanding of sepsis pathophysiology has increased, and to address issues like wide variation in reported incidence and outcomes when using the existing definitions. The need to refine definitions to improve accuracy of diagnosis and allow better research is an ongoing topic.
This presentation on how dried blood spot testing may overcome some of the barriers to HIV testing was given by Philip Cunningham, NSW State Reference Laboratory for HIV, at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
The document provides current guidelines for the management of sepsis. It defines terms used to describe septic patients such as bacteremia, septicemia, SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and MODS. It discusses the epidemiology of sepsis, etiology, definitions of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles, and recommendations for initial resuscitation, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, source control, fluid therapy, vasopressors, corticosteroids, blood product administration, mechanical ventilation, and supportive therapy of severe sepsis.
Initial management of septic shock involves following the hour-1 sepsis bundle which includes drawing blood cultures, measuring serum lactate levels, administering appropriate antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition, giving a balanced crystalloid fluid resuscitation, and administering vasopressors if the patient is hypotensive despite fluid resuscitation. A novel early indicator of sepsis called monocyte distribution width (MDW), which can be measured from a routine complete blood count within 30 minutes, may help improve early sepsis detection when used in combination with other clinical factors. Proper recognition and management of sepsis within the first hour can help reduce morbidity and mortality.
Quality Improvement Sepsis Recognition & TreatmentJoseph Di Genova
Problem:
-Delayed sepsis recognition/treatment in other hospitals
Solutions/Compliance:
-Utilize EMR system (BPA alert) & standard protocol to provide prompt recognition/treatment
Improving Outcomes:
-Adequately train staff and enforce/audit usage and patient outcomes
Maintaining Progress:
-Continually review & study implementation of BPA alert
-Seek ways to critique/improve recognition of potentially septic patients (algorithm used by EMR system)
CURRENT INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC S...Bassel Ericsoussi, MD
This document provides guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock according to current international standards. It recommends initiating early goal-directed therapy as soon as hypoperfusion is recognized to target specific goals within the first 6 hours, including a central venous pressure of 8-12 mmHg and mixed venous oxygen saturation above 70%. Various methods for assessing fluid status and fluid responsiveness are discussed, including measurements of the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation.
Sepsis is the body's extreme response to infection which can lead to widespread inflammation and organ damage. It is a growing problem, with over 18 million cases worldwide each year resulting in 1.4 million deaths daily. Those at highest risk include the very young, very old, and those with compromised immune systems. Early recognition and treatment is key to survival, with screening tools looking for signs of infection combined with altered vital signs. The sepsis resuscitation bundle provides a standardized approach to initial treatment within the first 6 hours, including antibiotics, fluids, and vasopressors to stabilize the patient.
Sepsis is leading cause of death in children. septic shock and multi organ dysfunction is final common pathway for death in various infections. We discuss here evidence based management of sepsis and septic shock in children.
This document provides guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in adult patients. It summarizes the normal physiology of the HPA axis and adrenal response to stress. Regarding diagnosis, it finds low quality evidence and does not recommend the ACTH stimulation test or random cortisol alone. It suggests against using free cortisol levels and salivary cortisol levels over total serum cortisol. It conditionally recommends the high-dose over low-dose ACTH test for diagnosis due to ease of use and safety.
This document summarizes the key points of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). It discusses why new definitions were needed, the process used to develop the definitions, and the main changes and recommendations. The new definitions focus on organ dysfunction rather than inflammation. Sepsis is now defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock involves circulatory and metabolic abnormalities requiring vasopressors and showing elevated lactate. The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is recommended outside the ICU to help identify potential sepsis.
This document provides guidelines for treating sepsis, septic shock, and surviving sepsis. It defines terms like SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. The key pathophysiology of organ injury in sepsis is described. Treatment protocols like the Sepsis Six and Surviving Sepsis Campaign aim to rapidly identify and treat sepsis patients. Initial resuscitation focuses on fluid administration, vasopressors, inotropes, and lactate normalization. Antimicrobial therapy within 1 hour is critical. Source control through drainage or surgery may be needed. Overall the document provides clinical definitions and guidelines for diagnosis and management of sepsis.
Sepsis is a medical emergency that requires rapid identification and treatment to stop the sepsis cascade and save lives. The most effective method for improving survival and outcomes is to quickly diagnose sepsis, immediately implement treatment with antibiotics and fluid resuscitation, and use an organized approach outlined in best practice guidelines and quality measures. Key aspects of treatment include measuring lactic acid levels, obtaining blood cultures, administering broad spectrum antibiotics, and fluid boluses for hypotension or elevated lactate, in order to restore aerobic metabolism and perfusion.
The document provides an update on sepsis, including its history, definitions, pathophysiology, management, and future directions. It summarizes the evolution of sepsis definitions from 1991 to Sepsis-3 in 2016. The Sepsis-3 definition defines sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It also outlines recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign for early management of sepsis including initial resuscitation and antimicrobial therapy.
The document discusses the case of a 51-year-old man presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock. It outlines his initial treatment including IV fluids, antibiotics, and vasopressors. Further workup revealed a hepatic abscess which was drained surgically. The patient eventually recovered after 10 days of targeted antibiotic therapy guided by cultures. The document also reviews key literature on defining sepsis, early management principles like early goal-directed therapy, and optimization of oxygen delivery through fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes, and blood transfusions.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues. Globally, sepsis kills about 8 million people annually. Early recognition and treatment are key to improving outcomes. The first hours after diagnosis are especially critical, as mortality increases by about 8% every hour that antibiotics are delayed. Prompt administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation can significantly reduce mortality from sepsis.
1) The document defines sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock and provides diagnostic criteria. It discusses initial resuscitation goals for the first 6 hours including fluid administration, vasopressors, and ScvO2/lactate monitoring.
2) Management recommendations are provided for antimicrobial therapy, source control, fluid therapy, vasopressors, blood products, glucose control, and other areas. Bundle elements are outlined to be completed within 3 and 6 hours of diagnosis.
3) Guidelines include level of evidence ratings and discuss evidence from studies on topics like fluid resuscitation, vasopressor use, and ventilator management for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
1) The document discusses CMS's new sepsis core measures that took effect in October 2015 and are aimed at improving early management of sepsis through compliance with sepsis bundles.
2) It provides an overview of the definitions for severe sepsis and septic shock that determine when the core measure time clocks begin. The measures require drawing lactate and blood cultures, administering antibiotics and fluids, and reassessing patients within 3 and 6 hours of presentation.
3) Successful implementation of the sepsis core measures requires standardized identification processes, evidence-based treatment adhering to bundles, and ongoing process improvements including engaging physicians, identifying gaps, and facilitating a culture of protocol compliance.
A 60-year-old female with diabetes and hypertension presented with altered mental status and fever for 3 days. On examination, she had a high heart rate, low blood pressure, high respiratory rate, and high blood glucose. Initial lab work showed high lactate, low platelets, and signs of infection on urine and blood tests. This patient is showing signs of sepsis such as altered mental status, hypotension, and elevated lactate. The initial response should be rapid fluid resuscitation with crystalloids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and vasopressors if needed to maintain blood pressure. Close monitoring and treatment based on sepsis guidelines is needed in the first critical hours to prevent further organ dysfunction.
Salon a 14 kasim 09.00 10.15 arzu topeli̇ i̇ski̇t-ingtyfngnc
This document summarizes updates in sepsis epidemiology, diagnosis, and management based on recent guidelines and studies. It notes that sepsis affects millions worldwide each year and is a leading cause of death in hospitals. While guidelines over the past decade have aimed to increase early diagnosis and treatment, compliance remains low and an expected decrease in mortality has not been observed. Ongoing research continues to investigate new diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents for sepsis.
This document provides an update to the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock. A consensus committee of 55 international experts from 25 organizations reviewed evidence and developed recommendations. They addressed 93 statements, including 32 strong recommendations, 39 weak recommendations, and 18 best practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. The guidelines are intended to improve outcomes for patients with sepsis or septic shock in a hospital setting, though clinical judgment is still required given variability in individual patients.
Sepsis is SIRS which is due to an infection
Sepsis is a major cause of mortality, killing approximately 1,400 people worldwide every day
Everyone has the potential to get sepsis
Easy to identify – we know what we’re looking for
Tools – observations scoring, clinical acumen, experience
Sepsis Screening Tool
The document summarizes the key findings and conclusions from a task force that updated the definitions of sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). The task force convened experts who engaged in iterative discussions to address limitations of previous definitions. The new definitions define sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, and septic shock as a subset of sepsis with profound circulatory and metabolic abnormalities. A quick bedside score (qSOFA) was also developed to help identify patients likely to face poor outcomes.
This document discusses the history and issues with existing definitions of sepsis. It summarizes that the 1992 consensus definitions of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were an improvement but lacked specificity. Later studies found that the SIRS criteria were too sensitive and nonspecific, missing around 12% of cases. There have been calls to revisit the definitions as understanding of sepsis pathophysiology has increased, and to address issues like wide variation in reported incidence and outcomes when using the existing definitions. The need to refine definitions to improve accuracy of diagnosis and allow better research is an ongoing topic.
This presentation on how dried blood spot testing may overcome some of the barriers to HIV testing was given by Philip Cunningham, NSW State Reference Laboratory for HIV, at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
The document provides current guidelines for the management of sepsis. It defines terms used to describe septic patients such as bacteremia, septicemia, SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and MODS. It discusses the epidemiology of sepsis, etiology, definitions of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles, and recommendations for initial resuscitation, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, source control, fluid therapy, vasopressors, corticosteroids, blood product administration, mechanical ventilation, and supportive therapy of severe sepsis.
Initial management of septic shock involves following the hour-1 sepsis bundle which includes drawing blood cultures, measuring serum lactate levels, administering appropriate antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition, giving a balanced crystalloid fluid resuscitation, and administering vasopressors if the patient is hypotensive despite fluid resuscitation. A novel early indicator of sepsis called monocyte distribution width (MDW), which can be measured from a routine complete blood count within 30 minutes, may help improve early sepsis detection when used in combination with other clinical factors. Proper recognition and management of sepsis within the first hour can help reduce morbidity and mortality.
Quality Improvement Sepsis Recognition & TreatmentJoseph Di Genova
Problem:
-Delayed sepsis recognition/treatment in other hospitals
Solutions/Compliance:
-Utilize EMR system (BPA alert) & standard protocol to provide prompt recognition/treatment
Improving Outcomes:
-Adequately train staff and enforce/audit usage and patient outcomes
Maintaining Progress:
-Continually review & study implementation of BPA alert
-Seek ways to critique/improve recognition of potentially septic patients (algorithm used by EMR system)
CURRENT INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC S...Bassel Ericsoussi, MD
This document provides guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock according to current international standards. It recommends initiating early goal-directed therapy as soon as hypoperfusion is recognized to target specific goals within the first 6 hours, including a central venous pressure of 8-12 mmHg and mixed venous oxygen saturation above 70%. Various methods for assessing fluid status and fluid responsiveness are discussed, including measurements of the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation.
Sepsis is the body's extreme response to infection which can lead to widespread inflammation and organ damage. It is a growing problem, with over 18 million cases worldwide each year resulting in 1.4 million deaths daily. Those at highest risk include the very young, very old, and those with compromised immune systems. Early recognition and treatment is key to survival, with screening tools looking for signs of infection combined with altered vital signs. The sepsis resuscitation bundle provides a standardized approach to initial treatment within the first 6 hours, including antibiotics, fluids, and vasopressors to stabilize the patient.
Sepsis is leading cause of death in children. septic shock and multi organ dysfunction is final common pathway for death in various infections. We discuss here evidence based management of sepsis and septic shock in children.
This document provides guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in adult patients. It summarizes the normal physiology of the HPA axis and adrenal response to stress. Regarding diagnosis, it finds low quality evidence and does not recommend the ACTH stimulation test or random cortisol alone. It suggests against using free cortisol levels and salivary cortisol levels over total serum cortisol. It conditionally recommends the high-dose over low-dose ACTH test for diagnosis due to ease of use and safety.
This document summarizes the key points of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). It discusses why new definitions were needed, the process used to develop the definitions, and the main changes and recommendations. The new definitions focus on organ dysfunction rather than inflammation. Sepsis is now defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock involves circulatory and metabolic abnormalities requiring vasopressors and showing elevated lactate. The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is recommended outside the ICU to help identify potential sepsis.
This document provides guidelines for treating sepsis, septic shock, and surviving sepsis. It defines terms like SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. The key pathophysiology of organ injury in sepsis is described. Treatment protocols like the Sepsis Six and Surviving Sepsis Campaign aim to rapidly identify and treat sepsis patients. Initial resuscitation focuses on fluid administration, vasopressors, inotropes, and lactate normalization. Antimicrobial therapy within 1 hour is critical. Source control through drainage or surgery may be needed. Overall the document provides clinical definitions and guidelines for diagnosis and management of sepsis.
The document outlines guidelines for treating sepsis from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. It defines sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. It recommends protocols for initial resuscitation within the first hour, including measuring lactate levels, administering antibiotics and fluids, and obtaining cultures. The guidelines provide recommendations on screening, diagnosis, source control, and antimicrobial therapy to treat infection and improve outcomes for patients with sepsis.
The document provides guidelines for treating sepsis from 2016/2017. It defines sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by infection. Early identification and treatment of sepsis in the initial hours improves outcomes. The guidelines recommend initial resuscitation within 1 hour of recognition, including administering IV fluids and antibiotics. Ongoing fluid management should be guided by frequent reassessment. The guidelines provide recommendations on screening, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, source control, and other treatment aspects of sepsis management.
Accelerating the translation of medical research - 27 JuneInnovation Agency
Slides from the event focusing on translational research in Liverpool and North of England and why companies are establishing and growing operations in the region.
Septic shock, updated presentation, including latest guidelines from Intensive care societies and how to approach to the diagnosis with few notes about Early Goal Directed Therapy and role of steroids
The research interest of the investigator has focused on the molecular and cellular pathogenesis of sepsis. In particular, he has worked on soluble proteins involved in the innate recognition of bacteria such as soluble CD14 and MD-2, as well as in the Toll-like receptors activated by Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Another area of study is the molecular pathogenesis and cell signaling of ventilator-induced lung injury, and lung inflammation in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome. He has also identified and tested biomarkers in the field of clinical sepsis.
Watch the presentation on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyWN7JlhlmI&
The document discusses sepsis and rational use of antibiotics. It defines sepsis as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It outlines the definitions of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock according to different criteria. It also discusses the pathophysiology, risk factors, common causes, signs and symptoms, and principles of management for sepsis which include early recognition, source control, and appropriate antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation. The document emphasizes the importance of rational antibiotic use by considering efficacy, dosage, route of administration, duration, history of allergy or intolerance, and recent antibiotic exposure.
maternal_survival_sepsis_guidelines_mgmh_20_2.pptxDr. Tara D
- The document presents a case of maternal sepsis that was initially missed due to lack of fever and clear infection source, as well as elevated white blood cell count being attributed to betamethasone rather than infection.
- It discusses the vulnerability of pregnant women to sepsis, risk factors, definitions and guidelines for managing maternal sepsis. Early recognition is key, but screening tools have limitations due to normal physiological changes in pregnancy.
- A two-step approach is recommended for diagnosis of maternal sepsis - an initial screening with vital signs and white blood cell count, followed by tests to evaluate end organ dysfunction if screening is positive. This helps address the limitations of single screening tools in pregnancy.
Advances in diagnostic technology allow for more sensitive, specific, rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of diseases. New methods like PCR, real-time PCR, in situ hybridization, biosensors, infrared thermography, and ELISA have improved on classical diagnostic approaches by being able to detect minute amounts of pathogens, identify pathogens rapidly, and differentiate between field strains and vaccine strains. These advanced diagnostic techniques are important for disease control, treatment, and surveillance.
Tackling the U.S. Healthcare System’s Infectious Disease Management ProblemViewics
The United States healthcare system has a serious infectious disease management problem. The antibiotic resistance crisis is widespread, serious, costly, and deadly. Delays in pathogen identification lead to poor clinical outcomes, including increased mortality risk. And, optimally managing outbreaks is critical to health systems whose reimbursement is tied to the health of a population, such as ACOs.
Eleanor Herriman, MD, MBA, Chief Medical Informatics Officer at Viewics led an informative panel discussion with industry leaders on the issues surrounding the infectious disease management crisis. Margret Oethinger, MD, Ph.D., Medical Director of Providence Health & Services, and Susan E. Sharp, Ph.D., DABMM, FAAM, Regional Director of Microbiology and the Molecular Infectious Disease Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente and President-Elect, American Society for Microbiology cover the current state of infectious disease management in the U.S., and what can be done to improve it.
You’ll learn about:
• The magnitude of the U.S. health system’s infectious disease management problem
• The most serious concerns and trends for healthcare institutions and communities across the nation
• The most promising solutions to health systems’ most urgent infectious disease management challenges
- Post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) involves taking antiretroviral drugs within 72 hours of potential exposure to HIV to prevent infection. Factors like the amount of blood and virus levels can influence transmission risk from needlesticks or other exposures. Proper wound care and starting a 28-day course of antiretroviral drugs are recommended. Follow-up testing for the exposed person is also important to monitor for potential infection. The goals of PEP are to suppress viral replication and prevent establishment of HIV infection after a possible exposure.
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It can progress from sepsis to severe sepsis to septic shock. The key principles of management include early recognition and resuscitation within 1 hour with fluids, antibiotics, and vasopressors if needed. Rational antibiotic use requires selecting antibiotics based on efficacy, dosage, and duration while considering factors like allergies and recent antibiotic use to improve outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance.
Multiplex Arrays for POC infection detentionScott Buckler
Randox is developing multiplex biochip arrays for point-of-care infection detection. Their technology allows up to 100 tests to be performed simultaneously on a single sample. They have developed arrays for sexually transmitted infections, respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, and sepsis. The sepsis array detects 47 bacterial and fungal targets and 3 antibiotic resistance genes directly from blood within 4 hours, which could transform sepsis care. Randox is also continually developing new molecular multiplex assays and working with clinical partners to define diagnostic needs.
New technologies in point-of-care nucleic acid testsPaolo Dametto
An adapted version of my technical Journal club on a new technology that detects DNA amplification using a pH-sensing system. The implications for point-of-care nucleic acid tests are significant.
Role of diagnostics for disease & infection prevention webinar4 All of Us
We find ourselves in the midst of the biggest global health crisis of our time and many are calling for increased testing for both the public and staff working in healthcare from primary to secondary.However, confusion reigns on the tests themselves; how they function, the accuracy and the cost to procure.
This webinar we examined the role of testing, examining current tests available and explore-
* The accuracy and predictability of tests
* The function of a test
* Their role in your patient pathway
* The barriers to adoption of tests
* The case studies of success across the UK
Speakers
John Bagshaw - BIVDA
David Watwood - Ciga Healthcare
Marc Winrow - Lumos Diagnostics
Point of Care Testing (POCT) refers to medical testing that is conducted outside of a laboratory setting, typically near or at the location of a patient. This can include testing in a physician's office, at home, in the field, or in a hospital room. POCT is usually performed using portable, handheld, or small benchtop devices. Here are some main features and advantages of POCT:
Convenience and Speed: Since POCT can be done at or near the patient's location, it eliminates the need to send samples to a lab and wait for the results. This can result in quicker diagnosis and treatment.
Immediate Decision Making: With instant results, healthcare providers can make immediate decisions about a patient's care, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Reduced Costs: While some POCT devices can be expensive, they may reduce overall healthcare costs by shortening hospital stays, reducing the number of follow-up visits, and preventing complications.
Simplicity: Many POCT devices are designed to be user-friendly, allowing non-laboratory personnel or even patients themselves to conduct tests.
Connectivity: Modern POCT devices often come with connectivity options, enabling the integration of test results into electronic health records.
Versatility: There's a wide range of tests available for POCT, from blood glucose testing to rapid strep tests and coagulation tests.
However, it's also important to note some challenges with POCT:
Quality Control: Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of POCT results can be challenging, especially if tests are being conducted by non-laboratory personnel.
Cost: Some advanced POCT devices can be costly, and there may be additional costs associated with training and quality control.
Regulation and Oversight: Because POCT is performed outside of the traditional lab setting, there can be challenges related to oversight, regulation, and ensuring that tests meet necessary standards.
In summary, while POCT offers many advantages in terms of speed and convenience, it's essential to ensure that tests are accurate, reliable, and meet necessary standards.
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in India play a crucial role in the detection and management of various diseases, including infectious diseases like malaria, dengue, and more recently, COVID-19. Here's an overview of RDTs in India:
Importance in Disease Management: In a vast and diverse country like India, with varied healthcare infrastructure across its regions, RDTs provide a quick and effective way to diagnose diseases, especially in remote areas where sophisticated laboratory setups might not be available.
Malaria and Dengue Detection: RDTs for malaria (based on the detection of antigens produced by malaria parasites) and dengue (based on the detection of dengue NS1 antigen and anti-dengue antibodies) are widely used. They offer results in less than
Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) in India play a crucial role in the quick detection and diagnosis of various diseases. They are espec
surviving sepsis guidelines - Notes are made from surviving sepsis guidelines 2016 article to assist medical students and residents to grasp subject in a easy to read format in a step wise manner. Resources: surviving sepsis guidelines 2016 (free access article)
Routine Laboratory Investigations discusses the need for and types of laboratory investigations that can be performed. It covers classifications of tests based on where they are done, their sensitivity and specificity, and frequency of use in dental practice. Commonly used hematological investigations include complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, bleeding time, and clotting time. Tests of blood glucose levels are among the most frequently used serum chemistry investigations. The document emphasizes correctly interpreting results in the context of a patient's history and clinical findings.
Similar to MCIRCC-SepsisPortfolio_20141022E (1) (20)
1. Critical Care Grand Challenge:
Sepsis Innovation Portfolio
A comprehensive innovation portfolio comprised of therapeutics,
diagnostics, devices and digital health solutions to transform
the way we diagnose, treat and monitor SEPSIS to improve
patient care and outcomes, enhance the clinician experience,
and reduce healthcare costs.
Sepsis is a body-wide
response to infection
that can cause organ
failure and death.
2. What is Sepsis?
Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition caused by an extreme immune response to an infection. Chemicals released into the
blood to fight the infection trigger widespread inflammation that becomes uncontrolled and leads to multiple organ damage. Think of it
as “friendly fire” within the body caused by an infection or other insult. Sepsis has devastating consequences, including long hospital
stays, recurring complications, and a high death rate.
Inflammation
Blood
Clotting
Reduced
Blood
Flow
Oxygen &
Nutrient
Deprivation
Organ
Failure
Death
ANNUAL STATISTICS: A DEADLY TOLL
• 19 million cases worldwide
• 1 million cases in the U.S.
• #1 global killer, especially children
• 250,000 deaths in the U.S.
• #1 U.S. hospital cost at $20.3 billion
SURVIVING SEPSIS
• 75% of survivors may have long-term problems
• Higher risk of sepsis reoccurrence
• Increased risk of ICU-derived post-traumatic stress
syndrome
• Little support available for the vast number of survivors
that struggle with substantial post-recovery challenges
SIRS
Sepsis
SIRS +
Infection
Septic
Shock
Severe Sepsis +
Low Blood Pressure
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
Temperature: >38C or 36C
Heart Rate: >90
Respiratory Rate: >20
White Blood Cells: >12,000 or <4,000
Severe
Sepsis
Sepsis +
Organs Not Working
Total Number of Sepsis Survivors
≥ 3 Year Sepsis Survivors
With Cognitive Impairment
With Functional Disability
637,867
106,311
(95% CI: 79,692, 133,930)
476,862
(95% CI: 455,026, 498,698)
“New” Sepsis Survivors by Year
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Sepsis
Heart Attack
SOURCE: Iwashyna, Cooke, Wunsch & Kahn (2012) J Am Geri Soc 60:1070
3. 3
Symptoms & the“Art”of Diagnosis
• High fever
• Low body temperature
• Chills with body shaking
• Confusion or changes in mental status
• Rapid breathing (hyperventilation)
• Rapid heartbeat (tachycardia)
• Low urine production
CurrentTreatment
• Hospitalization is necessary to treat sepsis successfully.
• Blood culture tests are performed to identify the causative
pathogenic bacteria.
• While the test results are pending, intravenous
antibiotic therapy is administered to the patient consisting
of a broad-spectrum (kills a variety of bacteria) antibiotic
or multiple antibiotics.
• When the test results become available, the treatment
can then be tailored to combat the causative pathogenic
bacteria.
• Further testing may be done to identify the source or
originating site of the infection.
• Supportive therapy with oxygen, intravenous fluids, and
medications to restore normal blood pressure, is also
important for recovery.
Treatment Gaps
NO HOSPITAL “LAB TEST” EXISTS TO
DIAGNOSE SEPSIS
• Initial diagnosis relies on clinical suspicion, physical exam,
and vital signs
• Diagnosis confirmation depends on blood cultures that may
take up to 48 hours or more
• Test results/cultures may be inconclusive
• Improved outcomes if therapy starts within first 30-90
minutes of sepsis recognition
= Need for rapid, bedside diagnostics
LACK OF RAPID DIAGNOSTICS LEADS TO
USE OF BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTIC OR
MULTIPLE ANTIBIOTICS
• Contributes to antibiotic resistance
• Opportunistic infection resulting from compromised
immune system
• Life-threatening side effects like kidney and liver failure
• Under-treatment of critically ill patients
= Need for personalized management of immune system
NO GOOD MECHANISM TO MONITOR
PATIENT IMMUNE STATUS AND
THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
• Poor, slow, unreliable and invasive measures of fluid
responsiveness from rigorous hydration
• Unable to measure inflammatory cascade
• Uncertainwhentostart,addorstopprescribedtherapies
• Poor markers of liver and brain organ dysfunction
= Need better solutions for “front-line” patient management
MCIRCC Sepsis Innovation Portfolio:
SOLUTIONS FOR IMPROVED PATIENT OUTCOMES AT REDUCED HEALTHCARE COSTS
POTENTIAL CLINICIAN BENEFITS:
• Identify and respond to sepsis conditions earlier
• Deliver targeted, evidence-based and personalized
treatment
• Monitor and gauge effectiveness of therapeutic
interventions
POTENTIAL PATIENT BENEFITS:
• Accelerate recovery
• Reduce duration in ICU
• Improve survival
• Lessen risk of sepsis reoccurrence
• Decrease chronic complications
Ebola leads to death from sepsis
with multi-organ failure
4. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Portable
Monitoring System
for Early Detection
of Sepsis
A continuous, low-power,
non-invasive monitoring system
for early detection of sepsis
both inside and outside
the hospital
44
Optimize mechanical
structure of sensor ring
Finalize portable data
collection unit
Optimize computational
methodology using in-lab test data
Start analysis of data
collected in ICU
Conduct in-lab tests with
predefined experiments Initiate data collection in ICU
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH 5 MONTH 6
Collaborators
Rodney Daniels, MD
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Kyle Gunnerson, MD
Emergency Medicine
Ashwin Belle, PhD
Biomedical Image & Signal Processing
Sardar Ansari, PhD
Biomedical Image &
Signal Processing
Produces results faster than current
lab tests which can take up to 24 hours
Untethered monitoring sensor with
wireless communication
Captures high resolution, real-time
vascular dynamics information >> early
indicators of septic shock
Technology uses a “sensing ring” worn
on the finger
Sensor is small, simple, inexpensive +
physically robust
Kayvan Najarian, PhD
Computational Medicine
& Bioinformatics
Potential Partners
Apple
IBM
AirStrip
Phillips
GE Healthcare
Siemens Healthcare
License Technology
Class II Device
501(k)
regulatory
pathway
Kenn Oldham, PhD
Mechanical
Engineering
SPEED
PORTABLE
SPECIFICITY
NON-INVASIVE
SIZE
Heart rate + variability
Peripheral vascular
resistance
Pulse pressure variation
Algorithms extract biomarkers
indicative of sepsis
SENSOR
SIGNAL
PROCESSING
$
Principal
Investigators
5. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Sepsis
Endotheliopathy
Assessment Panel
Rapid detection and analysis
of endothelial cells and
coagulation/inflammation
biomarkers in blood to diagnose
and monitor sepsis
5
Collaborators
Maung Khaing Oo, PhD
Biomedical Engineering
Daniel Myers, DVM, MPH
Vascular Surgery
Kevin Ward, MD
Emergency Medicine
15-minute rapid, bedside diagnostic
Diagnose sepsis and severity + monitor
therapeutic intervention
Laptop-size for use in hospital, ambula-
tory and long-term care facilities
Utilizes standard syringe and tubing
equipment
Lower equipment and operational cost
compared to competition
Rodney Daniels, MD
Pediatrics-Intensive Care
Potential Partners
Enzo Lifesciences
Abbot
Optofluidic Bioassay
License Technology or
New Startup Company
Class II Device
501(k)
regulatory
pathway
Xudong Fan, PhD
Biomedical
Engineering
SPEED
PORTABLE
MULTI-USE
COMPATIBLE
COST
Detects endothelial cell
damage >> Linked to
sepsis + sepsis severity
Tests for blood biomarkers
Detects inflammation/coagulation
biomarkers >> Linked to sepsis
Replaces traditional ELISA reader
GLASS
CAPILLARY
STRUCTURE
OPTOFLUIDIC
DEVICE
$
Principal
Investigators
Fabricate multi-hole capillaries
Assemble entire optical detection
and microfluidic systems
Benchmark against current
standard test (ELISA)
Test endothelial cell detection
& benchmark against current
standard (FACS)
• Begin endothelial cell detection
• Complete detection of 6 biomarkers
in buffering agent
• Evaluate accuracy of endothelial cell detection
in standard solution of cells
• Complete detection of 6 biomarkers using blood
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH 5 MONTH 6
6. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Real-Time
Ultrasound Lung
Strain Measurement
Device
Device to monitor fluid
volume status and manage
mechanical ventilation
with sepsis patients
6
Test tidal volume & FRC estimates
of ventilated lung phantoms
Test ultrasound scanner with
ventilated phantoms
• Perform matched ultrasound/CT scans with
ventilated phantoms
• Perform lung ultrasound scans on ventilated
patients: 1 normal + 1 abnormal
• Repeat Month 3 & 4 with ventilated
phantoms, doubling experiments
• Repeat Month 5 with ventilated patients
• Compare strain data from ultrasound/CT
scans of ventilated phantoms
• Perform ultrasound scans on normal patient
Repeat Month 4 to demonstrate
reproducibility and refine methodology
MONTH 1 - In-Vitro MONTH 2 - In-Vitro MONTH 3 - In-Vitro & In-Vivo MONTH 4 - In-Vitro & In-Vivo MONTH 5 - In-Vitro & In-Vivo MONTH 6 - In-Vitro & In-Vivo
Collaborators
Kyle Gunnerson, MD
Emergency Medicine
Jamie Hamilton, PhD
CTO, Epsilon Imaging
Real-time, minute-to-minute updates
Safe, bedside application using
ultrasound technology
Monitor hydration + manage ventilation
Quantitative evaluation of lung function
Requires little expertise to operate
Potential Partners
Sonetics
Epsilon Imaging
GE Healthcare
Pfizer
License Technology
Class II Device
510(k) premarket
notification
Cheri Deng, PhD
Biomedical
Engineering
SPEED
NON-INVASIVE
SPECIFICITY
EASY
“Speckle track” lung’s
surface using 2D
ultrasound transducers
Calculate local lung
strain/stiffness
>> Indicates hydration
status
>> Determines point of
optimal ventilation
$
Principal
Investigators
Jonathan Rubin, MD, PhD
Radiology
MULTI-USE
7. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Point-of-Care
Platform Using
Redox as a
Sepsis Biomarker
Redox microfluidic diagnostic
device that detects sepsis
severity and gauges
response to therapy
7
• Test platform via swine shock model
• Optimize electrode for microfluidic
integration
• Test microfluidic/electrode device
• Design for manufacturing of
microfluidic platform
Begin initial prototype development • Finalize prototype
• File patent disclosure
• Test platform via swine shock model
• Further optimize electrode for microfluidic
integration
• Test prototype in critical care setting
• Refine prototype design
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH 5 MONTH 6
Collaborators
Mark Meyerhoff, PhD
Chemistry
5-minute bedside diagnostic
using redox as a biomarker
Detect sepsis severity + monitor
therapy + prognostic measure
Hand-held device for use at
hospital, ambulatory and long-term
care facilities
Technology maintains sensitivity
for accurate & precise redox
measurements in whole blood
Enables new therapies for sepsis
treatment that target redox
Rodney Daniels, MD
Pediatrics-Intensive Care
Potential Partners
Abbott
Werfen Group
Epocal
License Technology or
New Startup Company
Class II Device
510(k) PMA
regulatory pathway
Shuichi
Takayama, PhD
Biomedical
Engineering
SPEED
PORTABLE
SENSITIVITY
NEW BIOMARKER
Non-permeable
to oxygen/air
Measures whole
blood redox
Resists biofouling
Maintains sensitivity
Compatible with potentiostat reader and future
device with embedded screen for result reporting
NANOPOROUS
GOLD ELECTRODE
SENSOR
DISPOSABLE
CARTRIDGE
MICROFLUIDIC
DEVICE
Principal
Investigators
MULTI-USE
$
8. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Immunotherapy
& Immunophenotyping
for Sepsis Treatment
Therapeutic to boost patients’
immune response using
Interleukin-15 (IL-15) to stimulate
T cell production to combat the
underlying cause of sepsis
8
Produce nanoparticles and conduct dose response study
Conduct delayed
treatment study and data
analysis for biomarkers
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH 5 MONTH 6
Collaborators
James Moon, PhD
Pharmaceutical
Sciences and Biomedical
Engineering
Jean Nemzek, DVM, MS
Laboratory Animal
Medicine
Jianping Fu, PhD
Biomedical
Engineering
Principal
Investigators
Prolonged treatment
at reduced IL-15 quantities
>> boosts immune response
+ reduces side effects and toxicities
Therapeutic + diagnostic + prognostic
system to treat and manage patients
Real-time status updates to monitor
therapeutic interventions
Requires very small blood volumes for
safe use with neonates and infants
Single application, pharmaceutical-grade
injectable delivered bedside
DELIVERY
MULTI-USE
BLOOD
SPEED
EASY
Potential Partners
PerkinElmer
Vedantra Pharmaceuticals
License Technology/Therapy
Investigational New Drug (IND)
regulatory pathway
$
Delivery +
prolonged
release of IL-15
Phenotypes T cells
>> sepsis biomarker
Monitors efficacy
of IL-15 therapy
IL-15
THERAPEUTIC
MICROFLUIDIC
PLATFORM
+
IL-15
ICMV NANOPARTICLE
Stimulates T Cell
Production
9. Technology
Competitive
Advantage
Team
Commercialization
Roadmap
PROJECT MILESTONES
Rapid
Determination of
Bacteremia & Antibiotic
Resistance in Sepsis
Direct detection of microbial DNA
allows physicians to quickly
identify the right drug for
the right bug, to treat
sepsis patients
9
Hire chemistry &
microbiology technicians
Design & synthesize PCR
primers for target bacteria
Modify & couple nanorods
to PCR primers
Determine limits for bacteria
detection & accuracy of test
with whole human blood
Confirm efficacy of PCR primers
& synthesize gold nanorods
Test nanorod-primer couples
in whole human blood
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH 5 MONTH 6
Principal
Investigators
J. Scott VanEpps, MD, PhD
Emergency Medicine
Nicholas Kotov, PhD
Biomedical Engineering
Rapid 3-hour bedside diagnostic vs.
24-72 hour blood culture
Bacterium identification +
antibiotic resistance profile
Narrow antibiotic regimen for
personalized treatment and
improved care
Identify bacteria at low concentrations
and without prior culture growth
Reliable and easy to perform test
SPEED
MULTI-USE
SPECIFICITY
SENSITIVITY
EASY
Potential Partners
Airstrip
Nico Technologies
Genetech
Nanosphere
Class II Device
PMA
regulatory
pathway
$
License Technology
Blood Sample
+ =
GOLD
NANORODS
PCR
PRIMERS
SINGLE
MOLECULE
DETECTION
NR-PCR
Organism
Antibiotic Resistant Genes
Targeted Therapy
10. 10
About MCIRCC
The U-M Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care (MCIRCC) is one of the world’s first comprehensive research enterprises
devoted to transforming critical care medicine by accelerating science and moving it from bench to bedside. To do this, MCIRCC
brings together integrative teams comprised of world-class U-M scientists, clinicians, and engineers with industry partners and
funding sources to develop and deploy cutting-edge solutions that elevate the care, outcomes, and quality of life of critically ill
and injured patients and their families.
CRITICAL CARE GRAND CHALLENGE
MCIRCC is currently utilizing the Accelerant Cycle funding program outlined below with its inaugural
Critical Care Grand Challenge targeting sepsis. Designed to support high-impact proposals for
milestone driven research over a six-month timeframe, the Grand Challenge targets the most
pressing problems in critical care and rewards bold solutions created by teams working together
to move these solutions into the critical care ecosystem.
ACCELERANT FUND
A mechanism to accelerate science and move it from bench to bedside, the Accelerant Fund unites
researchers, business experts, philanthropists, and disease foundations to develop critical care solutions
and deploy them to market faster:
• A panel of experts from research and industry screen applications from MCIRCC teams and select projects with the greatest
transformational promise.
• Mentors from the top ranks of business, venture capital, and the healthcare industry work with the scientists to translate their
discoveries into marketable technologies.
• Pioneering philanthropic partners—U-M alums, corporate and foundation partners, and individuals with a passion
for great research—provide funding for proof-of-concept work, helping researchers to create spin-off
companies and tap licensing opportunities.
• Once a technology successfully moves forward, MCIRCC reinvests its share of all royalties and
license fees from the resulting intellectual property into the Accelerant Fund, increasing future
support capabilities and continuing the cycle of innovation.
The goal is to find “game-changers” that demonstrate the greatest potential to transform
critical care and elevate patient outcomes at reduced costs.
11. GOAL:
To accelerate
disruptive science
and move it from
bench to bedside
Partners Defined
• Disease Foundations
• Key Opinion Leaders
• Industry
License
Royalty
Funding
Sources
Accelerant
Fund
Funded by
Donors
Proposal from MCIRCC
Research Team
Evaluation Group
Review
Projects Selected
• Novel/disruptive
• Clear path to commercialization
Accelerant Screen
Project Strengthening
• Workflow
• Business Model Canvas
• Value Proposition & Verification
Ideation Plan
• MVP Plan
• Rapid Iterative Testing
• Prototype Build & Test
Mentor
Coaching
Spin Out
Company
Minimally Viable Product
Commercialization Plan
CATALYST TEAM
Accelerant Cycle
INFLUENCE SCIENCE AND DISCOVERY FOR
HIGH-IMPACT, REAL WORLD SOLUTIONS
12. (734) 647-4751 • mcirccinfo@umich.edu • micircc.org
Critical Care Grand Challenge: Sepsis Innovation Portfolio
Sepsis is a complex public health problem that affects over one million Americans per year, results in 250,000
annual deaths, and represents the highest annual treatment cost in U.S. hospitals at $20.3 billion. Sepsis does not
discriminate, but attacks the young and elderly, the sick and the healthy. Despite its debilitating effects and huge
economic burden, only three out of 10 Americans know the word sepsis.
Recognizing the need to revolutionize sepsis care and treatment, the U-M Center for Integrative Research in Critical
Care’s Grand Challenge program integrates medical and engineering experts to develop and deliver transformative
solutions that elevate patient outcomes at reduced costs.
“If we can make something that works well for the septic patient given all its complexities, those technologies
could easily translate to other settings such as trauma, cardiac arrest, and traumatic brain injury, to name a
few. The Grand Challenge gives us the opportunity to build platform technologies and approaches.”
— KEVIN WARD, MCIRCC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR