Septic shock, updated presentation, including latest guidelines from Intensive care societies and how to approach to the diagnosis with few notes about Early Goal Directed Therapy and role of steroids
The recent definition, concept and terminologies of septic shock, surviving sepsis campaign, management techniques, SOFA score. Also includes antibiotics and supportive modalities.
The recent definition, concept and terminologies of septic shock, surviving sepsis campaign, management techniques, SOFA score. Also includes antibiotics and supportive modalities.
Updated global adult sepsis guidelines, released in October 2021 by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC), place an increased emphasis on improving the care of sepsis patients after they are discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) and represent greater geographic and gender diversity than previous versions.
The new guidelines specifically address the challenges of treating patients experiencing the long-term effects of sepsis. Patients often experience lengthy ICU stays and then face a long, complicated road to recovery. In addition to physical rehabilitation challenges, patients and their families are often uncertain how to coordinate care that promotes recovery and matches their goals of care.
Latest definition of sepsis, application of qSOFA, latest evidence on treatment of septic shock,role of fluids, role of steroids, isobalance salt solution
Updated global adult sepsis guidelines, released in October 2021 by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC), place an increased emphasis on improving the care of sepsis patients after they are discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) and represent greater geographic and gender diversity than previous versions.
The new guidelines specifically address the challenges of treating patients experiencing the long-term effects of sepsis. Patients often experience lengthy ICU stays and then face a long, complicated road to recovery. In addition to physical rehabilitation challenges, patients and their families are often uncertain how to coordinate care that promotes recovery and matches their goals of care.
Latest definition of sepsis, application of qSOFA, latest evidence on treatment of septic shock,role of fluids, role of steroids, isobalance salt solution
presentation on SIRS septic shock and multiorgan failure,and their corelation together in increasing morbidity and mortalitiy in shocked patient explaning pathophysiology clinical picture and how to manage
Definition of sepsis and septic shock.
The new definition of sepsis 2016 conference.
SIRS, SOFA, QSOFA
Most common pathogen causing sepsis.
Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of sepsis
Biomarkers for detection of sepsis and septic shock
Preseason, sCD14 Subtype marker
Comparison of Procalcitonin and CRP with presepsin.
Mechanism of presepsin detection.
Management of sepsis.
The dimensions of healthcare quality refer to various attributes or aspects that define the standard of healthcare services. These dimensions are used to evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of care provided to patients. A comprehensive understanding of these dimensions ensures that healthcare systems can address various aspects of patient care effectively and holistically. Dimensions of Healthcare Quality and Performance of care include the following; Appropriateness, Availability, Competence, Continuity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Efficacy, Prevention, Respect and Care, Safety as well as Timeliness.
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V PREVENTIVE-PEDIATRICS.pdfSachin Sharma
This content provides an overview of preventive pediatrics. It defines preventive pediatrics as preventing disease and promoting children's physical, mental, and social well-being to achieve positive health. It discusses antenatal, postnatal, and social preventive pediatrics. It also covers various child health programs like immunization, breastfeeding, ICDS, and the roles of organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and nurses in preventive pediatrics.
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V - ROLE OF PEADIATRIC NURSE.pdfSachin Sharma
Pediatric nurses play a vital role in the health and well-being of children. Their responsibilities are wide-ranging, and their objectives can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Direct Patient Care:
Objective: Provide comprehensive and compassionate care to infants, children, and adolescents in various healthcare settings (hospitals, clinics, etc.).
This includes tasks like:
Monitoring vital signs and physical condition.
Administering medications and treatments.
Performing procedures as directed by doctors.
Assisting with daily living activities (bathing, feeding).
Providing emotional support and pain management.
2. Health Promotion and Education:
Objective: Promote healthy behaviors and educate children, families, and communities about preventive healthcare.
This includes tasks like:
Administering vaccinations.
Providing education on nutrition, hygiene, and development.
Offering breastfeeding and childbirth support.
Counseling families on safety and injury prevention.
3. Collaboration and Advocacy:
Objective: Collaborate effectively with doctors, social workers, therapists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care for children.
Objective: Advocate for the rights and best interests of their patients, especially when children cannot speak for themselves.
This includes tasks like:
Communicating effectively with healthcare teams.
Identifying and addressing potential risks to child welfare.
Educating families about their child's condition and treatment options.
4. Professional Development and Research:
Objective: Stay up-to-date on the latest advancements in pediatric healthcare through continuing education and research.
Objective: Contribute to improving the quality of care for children by participating in research initiatives.
This includes tasks like:
Attending workshops and conferences on pediatric nursing.
Participating in clinical trials related to child health.
Implementing evidence-based practices into their daily routines.
By fulfilling these objectives, pediatric nurses play a crucial role in ensuring the optimal health and well-being of children throughout all stages of their development.
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
We understand the unique challenges pickleball players face and are committed to helping you stay healthy and active. In this presentation, we’ll explore the three most common pickleball injuries and provide strategies for prevention and treatment.
India Clinical Trials Market: Industry Size and Growth Trends [2030] Analyzed...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, "India Clinical Trials Market- By Region, Competition, Forecast & Opportunities, 2030F," the India Clinical Trials Market was valued at USD 2.05 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.64% through 2030. The market is driven by a variety of factors, making India an attractive destination for pharmaceutical companies and researchers. India's vast and diverse patient population, cost-effective operational environment, and a large pool of skilled medical professionals contribute significantly to the market's growth. Additionally, increasing government support in streamlining regulations and the growing prevalence of lifestyle diseases further propel the clinical trials market.
Growing Prevalence of Lifestyle Diseases
The rising incidence of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer is a major trend driving the clinical trials market in India. These conditions necessitate the development and testing of new treatment methods, creating a robust demand for clinical trials. The increasing burden of these diseases highlights the need for innovative therapies and underscores the importance of India as a key player in global clinical research.
Navigating the Health Insurance Market_ Understanding Trends and Options.pdfEnterprise Wired
From navigating policy options to staying informed about industry trends, this comprehensive guide explores everything you need to know about the health insurance market.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
2. Management of Septic Shock
Dr. Ramadan Arafa; MSc, MRCPI
Physician; Fujairah Hospital
3. OVERVIEW
• Septic shock is the most common cause of
mortality in the intensive care units.
• An analysis of a large sample from major US
medical centers reported the incidence of severe
sepsis is 3 cases/1000 population and 2.26 cases
per 100 hospital discharges. Of these patients,
51.1% were admitted to ICU, and 17.3% were in
an intermediate care or CCU (Angus 2001).
• The incidence of severe sepsis doubled over a 6-
year period (2004-2009) (Gaieski 2013).
6. (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)
is a systemic inflammatory response to non
specific insults.
SIRS
SIRS is either due to Infection or others
Clinically:
1. hyperthermia >38°C or hypothermia <36°C
2. tachycardia > 90 bpm
3. tachypnea > 20 r.p.m. or PaCO2 <4.3 kPa
4. neutrophilia >12000 or neutropenia <4000/uL or more
than 10% immature forms
8. Clinically?!
• Known or suspected infection, plus
• >2 SIRS Criteria.
Sepsis
The systemic inflammatory response to infection.
Severe sepsis-SIRS
• Severe sepsis resulting in at least one organ
failure
Clinically?!
• Sepsis plus >1 organ dysfunction.
9. Septic shock
•Sepsis induced shock with hypotension (SBP <90
mmHg or decreased > 40 mmHg from baseline
readings) despite adequate resuscitation plus;
presence of perfusion abnormalities which may
include lactic acidosis, oliguria, or an acute
alteration in mental status.
10. • Shock = inadequate tissue perfusion
–Decreased O2 delivery and decreased removal
of metabolites
• Tissue perfusion is determined by:
–Cardiac output (CO) = HR x SV
SV = function of preload, afterload,
contractility
–Systemic vascular resistance (SVR)
11. MODS
(multiple organ dysfunction syndrome)
The presence of altered organ function in an
acutely ill patient such that homeostasis cannot
be maintained without intervention.
17. It is not precisely understood, but it involves a
complex interaction between the pathogen
and the host's immune system.
Physiological response to localized infection:
o Influx of activated PMN leukocytes &
monocytes release of inflammatory
mediators
o Local vasodilatation & increased endothelial
permeability
o Activation of the coagulation cascade.
Pathophysiology
18. • The same occurs in septic shock but at
a systemic level.
1. Diffuse endothelial disruption
2. Increased vascular permeability
3. Vasodilatation
4. Thrombosis of end organ capillaries
23. How To Diagnose?
• When you suspect sepsis in patient with
predisposing factors, do not wait for septic shock
• The diagnosis of sepsis requires the taking of an
EXCELLENT history, physical examination,
appropriate laboratory tests, and a close follow-
up of hemodynamic status
• Early recognition is live saving in such rapid
overwhelming situation
24. Hyperdynamic- Warm-
Early Septic Shock
Restlness & confusion
Vitals
1. fever more than 38
chills
2. Mild decrease ABP
3. Tachycardia
4. Tachypnea
Skin warm ,dry ,flushed
High cardiac output
Hypodynamic- Cold- Late
Septic Shock
Semicomatosed
Vitals
1. Temperature
decreased
2. Tachycardia
3. Tachypnea
4. SBP<90mmHg
Oliguria & low COP
Multiorgan failure start at
this stage
25.
26. Work up…
Laboratory studies
o CBC
o Coagulation studies
o Blood, sputum, body fluids & urine cultures
o LFT, Renal and electrolytes
o Serum lactate
Imaging studies
o Chest radiography
o Abdominal radiography
o Others according to the suspected cause.
27. Complications of septic shock
• ARDS: starts 12-48 hours of the inciting event.
– Mild (mortality: 27%)
– moderate (mortality: 32%)
– severe (mortality: 45) (JAMA 2012)
• AKI: affects 40-70% of critically ill patients
• Chronic renal insufficiency
• DIC
• Mesentric ischemia
• Myocardial dysfunction and MI
• Liver failure
31. Management principles
• Early recognition
• Early and adequate antibiotic therapy
• Source control
• Early hemodynamic resuscitation and continued
support
• Proper ventilator management with low tidal
volume in patients with ARDS
32. General measures
• Venous access
• Crystalloid infusion
• Central venous line insertion ?
• Urinary catheterization
• Oxygenation and ventilation. Low tidal volume
ventilation is associated with better outcome
33. • Within 6 hours of presentation to ER, intensive
monitoring of specific circulatory parameters with
the aggressive management of 5 key parameters
to specified targets to optimise oxygen delivery to
tissues and maintain hemodynamic stability.
(Rivers 2001)
Early goal directed therapy
(EGDT)
34. Effective Sepsis Management for Quality
Patient Outcomes
• EGDT have been shown to be effective at
improving patient costs and outcomes,
including significant reductions in sepsis-
related mortality.
• EGDT with the PreSep oximetry catheter has
been shown to:
– Reduce sepsis-related mortality by 46%
– Reduce hospital length-of-stay by 5 days
– Reduce hospital charges by $5,882 per patient
– Guide therapy and enable early intervention
35. Continuous ScvO2 Monitoring, PreSep
Oximetry Catheter
The Vigileo monitor works with the
PreSep catheter
The PreSep catheter is a triple lumen
central venous oximetry catheter
with an added capability for
continuously monitoring ScvO2.
36. • Parameters
– CVP 8-12 mmHg
– MAP > 65mmHg and / or SBP > 90 mmHg
– Urine output > 0.5 ml/kg/hr
– Mixed venous oxygen saturation >65% / ScvO2 >70%
– Haematocrit >30%
• Interventions
– Reduce work of breathing by early use of mech. Vent
– Fluid resuscitation
– Use of vasoactive agents: noradrenaline, dobutamine
– Transfusion
38. • In critically ill patients, it is crucial to
maintain the balance between
oxygen consumption and oxygen
delivery
39.
40.
41. International guidelines for
management of severe sepsis and
septic shock 2012
The Society of Critical Care Medicine
The European Society of Intensive
Care Medicine 2013
42. Initial Resuscitation and Infection Issues
A. Initial Resuscitation:
1. We recommend the protocolized, quantitative
resuscitation of patients with sepsis- induced tissue
hypoperfusion (defined in this document as
hypotension persisting after initial fluid challenge or
blood lactate concentration ≥ 4 mmol/L).
This protocol should be initiated as soon as
hypoperfusion is recognized and should not be delayed
pending ICU admission.
43. During the first 6 hr of resuscitation, the goals of initial
resuscitation of sepsis-induced hypoperfusion should
include all of the following (grade 1C):
a) CVP 8–12 mm Hg
b) MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg
c) Urine output ≥ 0.5 mL/kg/hr
d) ScvO2 or SvO2 70% or 65%, respectively.
2. We suggest targeting resuscitation to normalize
lactate in patients with elevated lactate levels
44. B. Screening for Sepsis and Performance
Improvement
1. Routine screening of potentially infected
seriously ill patients for severe sepsis to allow
earlier implementation of therapy (grade 1C).
2. Hospital–based performance improvement
efforts in severe sepsis (UG).
45. C. Diagnosis
1. Cultures as clinically appropriate before
antimicrobial therapy if no significant delay (> 45
mins) in the start of antimicrobial(s) (grade 1C). At
least 2 sets of blood cultures to be obtained
before antimicrobial therapy with at least 1 drawn
percutaneously and 1 drawn through each
vascular access device, unless the device was
recently (<48 hrs) inserted (grade 1C).
2. Invasive candidiasis should be in differential
diagnosis of cause of infection.
3. Imaging studies performed promptly to confirm a
potential source of infection (UG).
46. D. Antimicrobial Therapy
1. Administration of effective IV antimicrobials within
the first hour of recognition of septic shock (grade
1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (grade
1C) as the goal of therapy.
2. - 2a. Initial empiric anti-infective therapy of one or
more drugs that have activity against all likely
pathogens (bacterial and/or fungal or viral) and that
penetrate in adequate concentrations into tissues
presumed to be the source of sepsis (grade 1B).
– 2b. Antimicrobial regimen should be
reassessed daily for potential de-escalation
(grade 1B).
47. 3. Use of low procalcitonin levels or similar biomarkers to
assist the clinician in the discontinuation of empiric antibiotics
in patients who initially appeared septic, but have no
subsequent evidence of infection (grade 2C).
4a. Combination empirical therapy for neutropenic patients
with severe sepsis (grade 2B) and for patients with difficult-to-
treat, multi-drugresistant bacterial pathogens such as
Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp. (grade 2B).
For patients with severe infections associated with respiratory
failure and septic shock, combination therapy with an
extended spectrum beta-lactam and either an aminoglycoside
or a fluoroquinolone is for P. aeruginosa bacteremia (grade
2B).
A combination of beta-lactam and macrolide for patients with
septic shock from bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae
infections (grade 2B).
48. 4b. Empiric combination therapy should not be administered
for more than 3–5 days. De-escalation to the most
appropriate single therapy should be performed as soon as
the susceptibility profile is known (grade 2B).
5. Duration of therapy typically 7–10 days; longer courses
may be appropriate in patients who have a slow clinical
response, undrainable foci of infection, bacteremia with S.
aureus; some fungal and viral infections or immunologic
deficiencies, including neutropenia (grade 2C).
6. Antiviral therapy initiated as early as possible in patients
with severe sepsis or septic shock of viral origin (grade 2C).
7. Antimicrobial agents should not be used in patients with
severe inflammatory states determined to be of
noninfectious cause (UG).
49. E. Source Control
1. A specific anatomical diagnosis of infection
requiring consideration for emergent source control
be sought and diagnosed or excluded as rapidly as
possible, and intervention be undertaken for source
control within the first 12 hr after the diagnosis is
made, if feasible (grade 1C).
2. When infected peripancreatic necrosis is
identified as a potential source of infection,
definitive intervention is best delayed until
adequate demarcation of viable and nonviable
tissues has occurred (grade 2B).
50. 3. When source control in a severely septic patient
is required, the effective intervention associated
with the least physiologic insult should be used (eg,
percutaneous rather than surgical drainage of an
abscess) (UG).
4. If intravascular access devices are a possible
source of severe sepsis or septic shock, they should
be removed promptly after other vascular access
has been established (UG).
51. F. Infection Prevention
1a. Selective oral decontamination and selective digestive
decontamination should be introduced and investigated as a
method to reduce the incidence of VAP; This infection
control measure can then be instituted in health care
settings and regions where this methodology is found to be
effective (grade 2B).
1b. Oral chlorhexidine gluconate be used as a form of
oropharyngeal decontamination to reduce the risk of VAP in
ICU patients with severe sepsis (grade 2B).
52. G. Fluid Therapy of Severe Sepsis
1. We recommend against using hydroxymethyl
starch for fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and
septic shock (grade1B).
2. We suggest the use of albumin in the fluid
resuscitation of severe sepsis and septic shock
when patients require substantial amounts of
crystalloids (grade 2C).
53. 4. Initial fluid challenge in a minimum of 30 mL/kg
of crystalloids (a portion of this may be albumin
equivalent). More rapid administration and greater
amounts of fluid may be needed in some patients
(grade 1C).
5. Fluid challenge technique be applied wherein
fluid administration is continued as long as there is
hemodynamic improvement either based on
dynamic or static variables (UG).
54. H. Vasopressors
1. Vasopressor therapy initially to target a MAP of 65 mm Hg
(grade 1C).
2. Norepinephrine as the first choice vasopressor (grade 1B).
3. Epinephrine (added to and potentially substituted for
norepinephrine) when an additional agent is needed to
maintain adequate blood pressure (grade 2B).
4. Vasopressin 0.03 units/minute can be added to
norepinephrine (NE) with intent of either raising MAP or
decreasing NE dosage (UG).
55. 5. Low dose vasopressin is not recommended as the
single initial vasopressor for treatment of sepsis-
induced hypotension and vasopressin doses higher than
0.03-0.04 units/minute should be reserved for salvage
therapy (failure to achieve adequate MAP with other
vasopressor agents) (UG).
6. Dopamine as an alternative vasopressor agent to
norepinephrine only in highly selected patients (eg,
patients with low risk of tachyarrhythmias and absolute
or relative bradycardia) (grade 2C).
56.
57. 7. Phenylephrine is not recommended in the
treatment of septic shock except in circumstances
where (a) norepinephrine is associated with serious
arrhythmias, (b) cardiac output is known to be high
and blood pressure persistently low or (c) as salvage
therapy when combined inotrope/vasopressor
drugs and low dose vasopressin have failed to
achieve MAP target (grade 1C).
58. 8. Low-dose dopamine should not be used for
renal protection (grade 1A).
9. All patients requiring vasopressors have an
arterial catheter placed as soon as practical if
resources are available (UG).
59. I. Inotropic Therapy
1. Dobutamine infusion up to 20 mcg/kg/min be
administered or added to vasopressor (if in use) in
the presence of (a) myocardial dysfunction as
suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and
low cardiac output, or (b) ongoing signs of
hypoperfusion, despite achieving adequate
intravascular volume and adequate MAP (grade 1C).
60. J. Corticosteroids
1. Not using IV hydrocortisone to treat adult septic
shock patients if adequate fluid resuscitation and
vasopressor therapy are able to restore hemodynamic
stability . In case this is not achievable, we suggest IV
hydrocortisone at a dose of 200 mg/ day (grade 2C).
2. Not using the ACTH stimulation test to identify adults
with septic shock who should receive hydrocortisone
(grade 2B).
61. 3. In treated patients hydrocortisone tapered when
vasopressors are no longer required (grade 2D).
4. Corticosteroids not be administered for the
treatment of sepsis in the absence of shock (grade 1D).
5. When hydrocortisone is given, use continuous flow
(grade 2D).
6. Steroids may be indicated in the presence of a
history of steroid therapy or adrenal dysfunction !!
62. K. Blood Product Administration
1. Once tissue hypoperfusion has resolved and in the
absence of extenuating circumstances, such as
myocardial ischemia, severe hypoxemia, acute
hemorrhage, or ischemic coronary artery disease,
we recommend that RBCs transfusion occur when
the Hb concentration decreases to < 7.0 g/dL to
target a Hb concentration of 7.0 to 9.0 g/dL in adults
(grade 1B).
63. 2. We recommend not using erythropoietin as a
specific treatment of anemia associated with severe
sepsis (grade 1B).
3. We suggest that FFP not be used to correct
laboratory clotting abnormalities in the absence of
bleeding or planned invasive procedures (grade 2D).
No studies suggest that correction of more severe
coagulation abnormalities benefits patients who are
not bleeding.
4. We recommend against antithrombin
administration for the treatment of severe sepsis
and septic shock (grade 1B).
64. 5. In patients with severe sepsis, we suggest that
platelets be administered prophylactically when:
– counts are ≤ 10,000/mm3 in the absence of apparent
bleeding
– counts are ≤ 20,000/mm3 if the patient has a
significant risk of bleeding.
– platelet counts ≥ 50,000/mm3 if the patient has active
bleeding, surgery, or invasive procedures (grade 2D).
65. L. Immunoglobulins
1. We suggest not using IV immunoglobulins in
adult patients with severe sepsis or septic
shock (grade 2B). Large RCTs found no benefit
M. Recombinant activated protein C
1. It is no longer available for treating patients
with severe sepsis or septic shock
66. N. Glucose Control
1. We recommend a protocolized approach to
blood glucose management in ICU patients with
severe sepsis, commencing insulin dosing when
two consecutive RBS levels are > 180 mg/dL. This
approach should target an upper blood glucose
level ≤ 180 mg/dL rather than an upper target
blood glucose ≤ 110 mg/dL (grade 1A).
2. We recommend blood glucose values be
monitored every 1-2 hrs until glucose values and
insulin infusion rates are stable, then every 4 hrs
thereafter (grade 1C).
67. 3. We recommend that capillary glucose levels to be
interpreted with caution, as such measurements
may not accurately estimate arterial blood or
plasma glucose values (UG).
68. O. Renal Replacement Therapy
1. Continuous RRT and intermittent hemodialysis are
equivalent in patients with severe sepsis and acute
renal failure (grade 2B).
2. Use continuous therapies to facilitate management
of fluid balance in hemodynamically unstable septic
patients (grade 2D).
P. Bicarbonate Therapy
1. Not using sodium bicarbonate therapy for the
purpose of improving hemodynamics or reducing
vasopressor requirements in patients with
hypoperfusion-induced lactic acidemia with pH
≥7.15 (grade 2B).
69. Q. Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis
1. Patients with severe sepsis receive daily
pharmacoprophylaxis against VTE (grade 1B).
Daily SC LMWH is more preferred than twice
daily UFH or three times daily UFH. If creatinine
clearance is <30 mL/min, use dalteparin (grade
1A) or another form of LMWH that has a low
degree of renal metabolism (grade 2C) or UFH
(grade 1A).
2. Patients with severe sepsis be treated with a
combination of pharmacologic therapy and
intermittent pneumatic compression devices
whenever possible (grade 2C).
70. 3. Septic patients who have a contraindication for
heparin use not receive pharmacoprophylaxis
(grade 1B), but receive mechanical prophylactic
treatment, such as graduated compression stockings
or intermittent compression devices (grade 2C),
unless contraindicated. When the risk decreases
start pharmacoprophylaxis (grade 2C).
71. R. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
1. Stress ulcer prophylaxis using H2 blocker or PPI
be given to patients with severe sepsis/septic
shock who have bleeding risk factors (grade 1B).
2. When stress ulcer prophylaxis is used, PPIs rather
than H2RA (grade 2D)
3. Patients without risk factors do not receive
prophylaxis (grade 2B).