This document summarizes the findings of a survey of 28 operating membrane bioreactor (MBR) facilities in North America with capacities over 1 mgd. Key findings include: 1) staffing levels averaged 1-1.5 FTEs per mgd of capacity; 2) effluent quality was typically below limits for BOD, TSS, and coliform; and 3) pretreatment most often consisted of perforated screens 1-2 mm and secondary screening. The document recommends pilot testing, dual stage screening, and peak flow management.
Study on Performance of Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system at various temperatu...AM Publications
The study on performance of sidestream membrane bioreactor (MBR) was studied by varying temperature (30oC, 33oC and 40oC)
along with crossflow velocity (1m/s, 1.5m/s and 2 m/s).CFV and temperature had significant effect on performance of sidestream MBR.
Performance was studied by analysing COD removal (%), flux declination, Transmembrane pressure, mixed liquor suspended solid
concentration. Maximum COD removal was 93% is obtained at 30oC with CFV 1.5 m/s. Flux declination is large at 30oC as compared to flux
declination at 33oC and 40oC temperatures for all CFVs. Sludge production in terms of MLSS, is large at 30oC and minimum at 40oC. This
high concentration of MLSS is responsible for large COD removal as well as increased in membrane fouling which cause large flux
declination. It is observed that high CFV causes less flux declination tends to large permeate flux. By visual perception it is observed that at
higher temperature, bioreactor content was more turbid than at low temperature this means that, large bioflocs get segregated and cause fast
scouring on membrane surface, it resultsslow down of permeate flux declination. Selection parameter (SP) was used to optimize the
operational condition of MBR system. Largest value of SP was treated as optimum value for operation of sidestream MBR. Thus, condition T
= 33oC, CFV = 2 m/s gave highest SP value 27 lit/m2-hr, and may be recommended for treating wastewater of COD 1092 mg/lit. Comparison
of side stream MBR with submerged MBR system was carried out, and it is observed that sidestream MBR data is best suitable for waste
water treatment.
Wastewater treatment using membrane bioreactorsHarishwar R
Membrane Biorector is an advanced technique which combines the power of membrane separation with Conventional Water Sludge Treatment Process. The Presentation deals about the two major configurations of MBR and their advantages and disadvantages.
An Overview of Membrane Bioreactors for Anaerobic Treatment of WastewatersAM Publications
Application of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for wastewater treatment could be an attractive alternative to
recover energy in terms of biogas. In recent years, researchers have shown that AnMBRs can be used to produce methane from
synthetic wastewater. Studies were conducted in the laboratory scale anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for treatment of synthetic
wastewater at different organic loading rates, under thermophillic and mesophilic conditions and ranging membrane flux. These
AnMBRs performed well for COD and BOD removal from the wastewater, demonstrating the effectiveness of this device for
wastewater treatment with COD and BOD removal efficiency above 90%. Results show that the application of anaerobic
membrane bioreactors is an efficient way to retain specific bacteria that can be a key for the treatment of wastewaters under
extreme conditions. The latter would enable their application to a wide range of industrial processes with the purpose of water
recycling. The challenge for future research is finding the optimum operational conditions to control the cake layer formation,
enhancing membrane performance and reducing the membrane area requirements. This will increase the economic feasibility of
AnMBRs, enabling its full scale application. The performance of the AnMBRs as reported in literature with different substrates,
membrane fouling issues and different membrane rector configurations are presented in this paper.
Study on Performance of Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system at various temperatu...AM Publications
The study on performance of sidestream membrane bioreactor (MBR) was studied by varying temperature (30oC, 33oC and 40oC)
along with crossflow velocity (1m/s, 1.5m/s and 2 m/s).CFV and temperature had significant effect on performance of sidestream MBR.
Performance was studied by analysing COD removal (%), flux declination, Transmembrane pressure, mixed liquor suspended solid
concentration. Maximum COD removal was 93% is obtained at 30oC with CFV 1.5 m/s. Flux declination is large at 30oC as compared to flux
declination at 33oC and 40oC temperatures for all CFVs. Sludge production in terms of MLSS, is large at 30oC and minimum at 40oC. This
high concentration of MLSS is responsible for large COD removal as well as increased in membrane fouling which cause large flux
declination. It is observed that high CFV causes less flux declination tends to large permeate flux. By visual perception it is observed that at
higher temperature, bioreactor content was more turbid than at low temperature this means that, large bioflocs get segregated and cause fast
scouring on membrane surface, it resultsslow down of permeate flux declination. Selection parameter (SP) was used to optimize the
operational condition of MBR system. Largest value of SP was treated as optimum value for operation of sidestream MBR. Thus, condition T
= 33oC, CFV = 2 m/s gave highest SP value 27 lit/m2-hr, and may be recommended for treating wastewater of COD 1092 mg/lit. Comparison
of side stream MBR with submerged MBR system was carried out, and it is observed that sidestream MBR data is best suitable for waste
water treatment.
Wastewater treatment using membrane bioreactorsHarishwar R
Membrane Biorector is an advanced technique which combines the power of membrane separation with Conventional Water Sludge Treatment Process. The Presentation deals about the two major configurations of MBR and their advantages and disadvantages.
An Overview of Membrane Bioreactors for Anaerobic Treatment of WastewatersAM Publications
Application of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for wastewater treatment could be an attractive alternative to
recover energy in terms of biogas. In recent years, researchers have shown that AnMBRs can be used to produce methane from
synthetic wastewater. Studies were conducted in the laboratory scale anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for treatment of synthetic
wastewater at different organic loading rates, under thermophillic and mesophilic conditions and ranging membrane flux. These
AnMBRs performed well for COD and BOD removal from the wastewater, demonstrating the effectiveness of this device for
wastewater treatment with COD and BOD removal efficiency above 90%. Results show that the application of anaerobic
membrane bioreactors is an efficient way to retain specific bacteria that can be a key for the treatment of wastewaters under
extreme conditions. The latter would enable their application to a wide range of industrial processes with the purpose of water
recycling. The challenge for future research is finding the optimum operational conditions to control the cake layer formation,
enhancing membrane performance and reducing the membrane area requirements. This will increase the economic feasibility of
AnMBRs, enabling its full scale application. The performance of the AnMBRs as reported in literature with different substrates,
membrane fouling issues and different membrane rector configurations are presented in this paper.
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) is the combination of a membrane process like microfiltration or ultrafiltration with a suspended growth bioreactor, and is now widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment.
MBR effectively uses the membrane to intercept the active micro-organism, which greatly increase the wastewater treatment capacity and improve the produced water quality.
BrightWater is a gel treatment polymer flooding in which a tightly bounded, thermally activated particle injected as a dilute slug which flows with the water and pops open deep in the reservoir and blocks the swept zones under the effect of high temperature. Its aim is to achieve more efficient sweep of the oil to the producing wells causing flow diversion by swelling and agglomerating of micro gel particles in the injection water.
MBR Technology Suppliers and Manufacturing CompanyWater_Treatment
MBR (Membrane Bioreactor) STP is proven excellent sewage treatment solution combined with best technologiesi= including immersed membrane filtration systems and biological that enhances biological treatment.
MBR membrane bio reactors are reliable system that you can use now. When it comes to the wastewater treatment, the MBR membrane bioreactors have always managed to deliver the best outcome. Now you can avail MBR membrane bio reactors at affordable prices. Visit https://www.eecusa.com/eec-products/eec-high-speed-bio-tec-mbbr/ for more information.
This presentation talks about the first commercial membranes starting in the 1960's and then moves on to discuss how membranes work and the processes required to clean them.
Deals with UASB reactors for the primary treatment of sewage, stabilization of sludge and removal of BOD. Various components of a UASB reactor are described and design details are included. Modifications to UASB such as UASB ponds, Anaerobic baffle reactors, migrating blanket reactors are also described here.
Introducing LEVAPOR StepFeed -IFAS process for BNR which combines advantages of both step feed and IFAS processes to achieve higher BNR efficiency and process performance.
Membrane based water purification technology(ultra filteration,dialysis and e...Sanjeev Singh
This is made by keeping in mind needy students who want to know water purification technology.This slide contain brief description about membrane,ultra filtration,dialysis,electro dialysis.For further topic check my updates regularly....... .At last i would like to thanks those students who downloaded this slide.
Lecture notes of Environmental Engineering-II as per Solapur university syllabus of TE CIVIL.
Prepared by
Prof S S Jahagirdar,
Associate Professor,
N K Orchid college of Engg and Technology,
Solapur
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) is the combination of a membrane process like microfiltration or ultrafiltration with a suspended growth bioreactor, and is now widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment.
MBR effectively uses the membrane to intercept the active micro-organism, which greatly increase the wastewater treatment capacity and improve the produced water quality.
BrightWater is a gel treatment polymer flooding in which a tightly bounded, thermally activated particle injected as a dilute slug which flows with the water and pops open deep in the reservoir and blocks the swept zones under the effect of high temperature. Its aim is to achieve more efficient sweep of the oil to the producing wells causing flow diversion by swelling and agglomerating of micro gel particles in the injection water.
MBR Technology Suppliers and Manufacturing CompanyWater_Treatment
MBR (Membrane Bioreactor) STP is proven excellent sewage treatment solution combined with best technologiesi= including immersed membrane filtration systems and biological that enhances biological treatment.
MBR membrane bio reactors are reliable system that you can use now. When it comes to the wastewater treatment, the MBR membrane bioreactors have always managed to deliver the best outcome. Now you can avail MBR membrane bio reactors at affordable prices. Visit https://www.eecusa.com/eec-products/eec-high-speed-bio-tec-mbbr/ for more information.
This presentation talks about the first commercial membranes starting in the 1960's and then moves on to discuss how membranes work and the processes required to clean them.
Deals with UASB reactors for the primary treatment of sewage, stabilization of sludge and removal of BOD. Various components of a UASB reactor are described and design details are included. Modifications to UASB such as UASB ponds, Anaerobic baffle reactors, migrating blanket reactors are also described here.
Introducing LEVAPOR StepFeed -IFAS process for BNR which combines advantages of both step feed and IFAS processes to achieve higher BNR efficiency and process performance.
Membrane based water purification technology(ultra filteration,dialysis and e...Sanjeev Singh
This is made by keeping in mind needy students who want to know water purification technology.This slide contain brief description about membrane,ultra filtration,dialysis,electro dialysis.For further topic check my updates regularly....... .At last i would like to thanks those students who downloaded this slide.
Lecture notes of Environmental Engineering-II as per Solapur university syllabus of TE CIVIL.
Prepared by
Prof S S Jahagirdar,
Associate Professor,
N K Orchid college of Engg and Technology,
Solapur
Steve Malloy, Principal Engineer, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) presents on the selection of MBR technology, including pre-selection and purchase of the membrane equipment, a description of the IRWD MBR facility, and lessons learned for use by other agencies, consulting engineers, and equipment vendors considering installation of an MBR for recycled water production.
Ponencia de Teresa de la Torre, ACCIONA Agua en Euromedacciona
“La evaluación de los procesos de forward osmosis en los procesos de depuración y reutilización de agua “, esta a ponencia será impartida por Teresa de la Torre. Más información sobre la participación de ACCIONA en Euromed: http://acciona.sa/MTo0W
Membrane filtration by Akram Hossain, Food and Process Engineering, HSTUAkram Hossain
This presentation explains about membrane filtration and its type. I collected information from different source and accumulated to make this. Hope you will find it useful.
A Novel Approach to Diafiltration for Intensified or Continuous ProcessingMilliporeSigma
Diafiltration (DF) is at the heart of the final downstream process step for a majority of mAb-based and other therapeutic molecules. However, as process templates have adapted to be more flexible, handle larger batch sizes, require lower plant footprint, and run in an integrated or continuous mode, DF has been one of the last unit operations to change. This poster describes a solution for continuous diafiltration that includes the following characteristics:
• Requires only a small modification to standard operating strategies
• Delivers a continuous process
• Yields significant reductions in membrane area and system size
To learn more about this topic or collaborate with our technical experts, schedule an in-person or remote visit at our M Lab™ Collaboration Centers: www.emdmillipore.com/mlab
A presentation about shared septic systems. Presented by Robert Roseen of Geosyntec Consulting during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2014 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
This is a presentation I put together prior to leaving the storm infrastructure industry. Please keep in mind that stormwater, especially water quality, is a rapidly evolving arena. I have not updated the presentation since leaving the business, but I hope the information is useful in a broad general way, and can point you in the direction of additional resources that you may find useful.
Gil Werntz
Scale-up of high area filters for microfiltration of biological fluids - Poin...MilliporeSigma
Presented at INTERPHEX on March 21-23, 2017.
High area filters can present unique challenges when scaling up from discs to cartridges. A model was developed that can be used to estimate scaled-up performance. A new small scale scaling tool is also introduced that closely mimics the filtration behavior of the full scale filter and that can be used to confirm expected scaled-up performance.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
4. MBRs are becoming a common
means for wastewater treatment, but
are still a relatively new technology
Previous papers have collected
trends from a few operating
installations
Objective was to collect information
from a larger cross-section to verify
trends identified in previous papers
Focus was on facilities with a
capacity of greater than 1 mgd
MBR Objectives
5. 28 Participating MBR Plants in
12 States and 1 Canadian
Province
o One-quarter were from the
Northwest
Capacities range from 1.4 mgd
to 39 mgd
Membrane types – Suez,
Evoqua, Kubota, Fibracast
Still open to more participants
Summarize findings to date
MBR Survey Status
6. Electronic format
o To facilitate responses
and consolidate
responses
Survey Process
7. 1. General Facility Information
2. Membrane Supplier
a. Manufacturer
b. Membrane Replacement History
3. Membrane Capacity
a. Number of Trains
b. Membrane Area
c. Flux Rates
d. Adequate Flux Capacity?
e. Operation at Design Flux Capacity?
f. Ability to Add Chemical to Achieve Design Flux
4. MBR Effluent Performance
a. BOD and TSS
b. Nutrients
c. Fecal Coliform
Survey Questions - 1
8. 5. Membrane Pretreatment
a. Primary Treatment, including coagulant addition
b. Number of Screen Sets
c. Perforated or Slotted Screens
d. Screen Opening Size
e. RAS Screening
6. Operation and Maintenance
a. Performed by Owner or Contracted?
b. Annual Cost
c. Number of Staff
d. Membrane Cleaning Method and Frequency
7. Membrane Control Network
a. Control System Type – Ethernet or Hard-wired?
b. Replacement or Modification Plans?
8. Membrane Air Scouring System
a. Air diffusers
b. Blower type
9. Additional Comments
Survey Questions - 2
10. Only one plant used contract
operations, the rest were owner
operated
Most of the plants had staffing of
1-1.5 FTEs per mgd of plant
annual average capacity
Staffing
13. Typical MBR effluent for
municipal wastewater
o <2 mg/L BOD
o < 1 mg/L TSS and
o <2.2 MPN coliform
When integrated with a properly
designed and operated
biological/chemical treatment
process,
o Low levels of ammonia (<0.1 mg/L)
o Total nitrogen (<5 mg/L)
o Phosphorus (<0.02 mg/L)
Performance
15. Debris can accumulate
around membrane fibers
Membrane flux, and
therefore plant capacity,
declines with membrane
fouling
Membranes Are Susceptible to Fouling from Debris
16. Perforated screens of 1-2 mm
opening are most often used
A few plants use 3 mm screen
openings
o All but one facility with 3 mm
screens used flat plate membranes
20 percent had the flexibility to
screen RAS
Twice as many plants had no
primary sedimentation
compared to those that did
Pretreatment
17. Single set of screens – 62
percent of facilities
Two sets of screens (in series) –
38 percent
Generally, larger facilities had two
sets of screens
o But two facilities with less than 2 mgd
of capacity also had two sets of
screens
Few facilities used slotted
screens
o Perforated screens predominated
Screening Configuration
19. Nearly all of the plants are
operating with actual flow
significantly less than design
flow
Actual flow averaged 69% of
design flow and were as low
as 38% of design flow
The two plants that are
operating near capacity
reported issues with achieving
the design flux rate
Actual Versus Design Flow
21. Flow equalization or flow
diversion is used by 75% of
the respondents
Flow equalization is the most
commonly used method of
managing peak flows
A few plants divert peak flows
to another treatment plant or
to another part of the MBR
plant
Peak Flow Management
23. Once the membrane is
fouled, more pressure
is required to push the
flow through the
membranes
Slope of flux versus
pressure is called
permeability
Relationship Between Flux, Transmembrane Pressure
and Permeability
When the membrane is fouled, it
takes more pressure to push equal
flow through the membrane.
Equal flow.
Greater pressure
stresses the
membrane and
reduces life.
24. The actual peak flux rate for the
surveyed plants averaged 16.9
gallons per day per square foot
(gfd)
The actual annual flux rate
averaged 12.0 gfd
These values are less than
typical manufacturers’
recommended design values
o Pilot tests are a prudent step to
determine the flux rates achievable
for a given wastewater
Flux Rates
25. Half the plants surveyed
had the capability to add
chemical to enhance flux
rate
Typical chemicals used
o Ferric chloride
o PAX 19
o Polymer
o MDE 50
Although several have
tested polymers to
improve flux rates, none
reported sustained
success
Chemical Addition to Enhance Flux Rate
28. Facilities designed to
operate at 5,000 to 13,000
mg/L MLSS
Most plants are operating
with 8,000-10,000 mg/L
MLSS
Most plants are using
laboratory filtration tests to
monitor membrane
loadings
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids
29. Typical basis for
operation at 8,000 to
10,000 mg/L
o High MLSS in
membrane tank
detrimental to
membrane permeability
o Oxygen transfer
efficiency reduced
Integrated Membrane Bioreactor Process
31. Several of the plants had been
in operation for less than 7
years
o One was proceeding with
membrane replacement
Five plants had been in
operation for 10-12 years
without replacing membranes
At seven plants, membranes
were replaced after 7-10 years
Membrane Life
32. Spectrum of membrane
manufacturers
o Suez: 15
o Evoqua/Siemens: 3
o Kubota: 7
o Fibracast: 1
o Not identified: 2
At two facilities, the
original membranes
had been replaced with
another manufacturer’s
product
Replacement with an Alternate Membrane Type
34. An MBR is a complex
system with many moving
parts
Control Systems
o All but one respondent use
Ethernet-type control
systems
o A few respondents had
made changes to the control
systems
Control Systems
35. Membrane Scouring Diffusers
o Coarse bubble diffusers were
more common than fine-bubble
diffusers
o Most manufacturers are
recommending coarse-bubble
diffusers
Membrane Scouring Blowers
o Centrifugal was most common
o But positive displacement units
were also used, as were Turbo
blowers
Other Findings
37. Operator gain experience
with membranes
Collect information on
actual flux
Verify cold weather impacts
Confirm ability to operate
within membrane warranty
limits
Operator gain experience
with membranes
Conduct Pilot Test before Design of Full-Scale Facility
38. Use dual stage screening
o Perforated plate upstream
o Downstream screen can be
drum or traveling band
screen
• Needs seal at perimeter to
capture all debris
Screen openings
o 1 or 2 mm for tubular
membranes
o May be able to use 3 mm
screens for flat plate
membranes
Effective Screening Is Essential to Effective Membrane
Treatment
Perforated
Plate Screen
Drum Screen
39. Unlike most other wastewater
treatment plants, MBR facilities
have variable capacity
Factors affecting membrane
capacity
o Membrane age
o Wastewater temperature
o Potential stresses on organisms
o Presence of foulants, such as debris
Most large facilities have
equalization or flow diversion to
manage peak flow
Peak Flow Control Is Critical
40. This survey is a work in progress
We welcome other Utilities to
participate in the survey!
To respond, go to the link
o https://hdrinc.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV
_cAxLxIZSCYdyivX
Or Contact
o Pat Roe: Pat.Roe@hdrinc.com
o Gordon Culp: gordon@smithculp.com
Your name will remain confidential and
we won’t share your name or contact
information
How to Participate