2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
It is a two-hour enhancement
session every week intended to all
grade 10 students.
3. It can be conducted during school
days or during weekends.
However if during school days, it
should be made sure that other
subjects are not affected as the
required number of hours of
attendance of students per week.
4. On the other hand if conducted
during weekends approval of
concerned parents must be
considered after explaining the
importance of such activity.
5. This project will focus on
answering/solving worded
multiple-type questions with four
options per item.
One to two NAT-based and least
learned competencies shall be
addressed per session by giving
five varied questions from easy,
average to difficult questions.
6. It is a pre-test, discussion, post-
test scheme
The questions are to be answered
by a pair of students preferably a
combination of average and basic
students.
7. There shall be two teachers
The questions are to be answered
by a pair of students preferably a
combination of average and basic
students.
8. There shall be two teachers in
such class, Facilitator 1 (F1),
Facilitator 2 (F2)
Facilitator 1 to discuss solutions
and
Facilitator 2 to assist in the
preparation of the session’s
activity at the end of the project.
9. The project aims to:
-increase Math MPS by at
least 4% over the pre-test
-improve Math quarterly MPS
by at least 3% over the
preceeding quarterly
-raise Math NAT MPS
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
10. This project will benefit the
Grade 10 and Grade 6 learners
and the school as well, through
improved learning outcomes.
TARGET BENEFICIARIES
11. The School Heads, Math
department Head-teachers and
Math Teachers are the Key
players of the Project EASE-UP
PROJECT METHODOLOGY
12.
EPS-MATH
1. Orient the school heads
and Math department head
about the project.
2. Facilitate in the
preparation of
questions/problems.
RESPONSIBILITIES
13. EPS- Math
3. Coach, mentor and
provide TA to school heads
and teachers regarding the
implementation of the
project.
4. Monitor status of the
implementation of the
project.
RESPONSIBILITIES
14. 1.Orient the teachers and
parents and encourage
support.
2. Prepare action plan for the
project.
RESPONSIBILITIES
School Head/Department Head
15. 3. Identify and assign potential
partners of Grade 10 Math
Teachers to assist in the
conduct of the project.
4. Monitor and evaluate the
implementation of the project.
RESPONSIBILITIES
School Head/Department Head
16. 5. Submit quarterly report to
SDO- CID through EPS in
Math.
RESPONSIBILITIES
School Head/Department Head
17. 1. Inspire students and create
among them positive attitude
towards taking the test.
2. Inspire and motivate
students to strive and
encourage mastery of Math
skills.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Grade 6 &10 Math Teachers
18. 3. facilitate, discuss solution,
and give correct and different
solutions to each
problem/question.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Grade 6 &10 Math Teachers
19. 4. Prepare 5-item multiple-type
questions parallel to the
questions used in the project
as assessment every end of
the session.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Grade 6 & 10 Math Teachers
20. 5. Submit report of students’
performance to School Heads.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Grade 10 Math Teachers
21. 1. Assist the Grade 6 and 10
teachers in the preparation of
test materials either in manila
paper or slide deck
presentation.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Other Math Teachers
22. 2. Assist the Grade 6 & 10
teachers in identifying and
addressing the difficulties of
the students on the basic and
pre-requisite concepts during
the session.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Other Math Teachers
23. The F2 do the preparatory activities
and arrange students in pair.
The working pair together answer the
posted 5 questions by the F2.
Each pair shall be given small piece
of manila paper to write their
solutions and answers to each
problem.
24. After the students are done, the
Facilitator 1 will verify their answers,
discuss solutions, give correct
answer and give other additional
questions if necessary especially for
the items where majority failed to
answer correctly.
25. Fifteen minutes before the session
ends, another 5- item test parallel to
the one given before shall be
administered to assess the learning
of the students.
26. Results will be recorded in a tracking
chart for monitoring and
enhancement. Remedial session
should be attended by teachers
assigned as F2 if deemed necessary,
questions for re teaching should be
prepared by the F1.
27. Project EASE- UP will be
implemented starting from giving of a
pre-test composed of 60- item
multiple-type test and to be answered
by Grade 6/10 learners.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
28. During the actual
implementation, the teacher-
in- charge will monitor the
performance of the teachers.
MPS of the competencies of
the session will be determined
every end of the session.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
29. SH as overall chairman of the
implementation of the project
will monitor and check
performance of the teachers
and use tracking report.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
30. Output of the project will be
based on the reports submitted
quarterly by the SHs to the SDO.
Reports should cover attendance
of teacher facilitators,
participation of students,
competencies addressed per
session.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
31. Facilitating and hindering
factors relative to the success
of the implementation are
other considerations of the M
& E reports.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
