New media: legal
implications (WP1)
Katrien Lefever
Peggy Valcke
David Stevens
2
3

 Overview


 Actors
    Network operators
    Broadcasters
        Flemish Media Act
        Audiovisual Media Services Directive
    Aggregators
4

 Network operator


 Privatisation of VRT transmission departement
 Neutral network operator: guarantee of a non-
  discriminatory and equitable treatment of all players
 Awarding frequencies
     Not all frequencies for transmission departement
     Tender procedure
5

 Content providers: Flemish Media Act


 Scope before May 2007
    Private broadcasters (particuliere omroepen):
     traditional broadcasters
        Approval
        Detailed obligations
    Television services (televisiediensten): video-on-
     demand, audiovisual fragments on internet,…
        Notification
        Less detailed obligations
6

 Content providers


 Bottlenecks
    New media services
   subjected to disproportional
   obligations
    Independency requirement:
   no political webTV
    => Ad hoc revision
   Flemish Media Act
7

 Content providers: Flemish Media Act


 Scope after May 2007
    Private broadcasters (particuliere omroepen):
     traditional broadcasters
        Approval
    Television services (televisiediensten): Private
     broadcasters offering other services to the public.
     Those services are services defined by art.49-50 ECT
     and their principal purpose is the provision of
     programmes.
        Notification
8

Content providers: Flemish Media Act


  Other private broadcasters (andere soorten
   televisieomroepen): no services defined by art.49-50
   ECT and the principal purpose is not the provision of
   programmes
      No approval or notification
      No independency requirement
      Eg. Political webTV
      Eg. user-generated-content
      Eg. websites that contain audiovisual elements only
       in an ancillary manner
      Eg. Video on YouTube, GarageTV
9

 Content providers: AVMS Directive


 Inspiration for this revision: evolutions at European level
     Television without Frontiers Directive (1989)
        Scope: traditional broadcasting services
     Audiovisual Media Services Directive
        Scope: audiovisual media services
        Technology neutrality : Linear and non-linear
         services
        Layered regulation
10

 Content providers: AVMS Directive


 AVMS is a service
    1) as defined by Articles 49 and 50 of the EC Treaty
    2) under the editorial responsibility of a media service
     provider
    3) and the principal purpose
    4) is the provision of programmes
    5) in order to inform, entertain or educate
    6) to the general public
    7) by electronic communications networks
11

 Audiovisual Media Service


 1) Articles 49 and 50 ECT : economic service
     Compensation
     Excluded: non-commercial websites
     (no ads)
     Included: videoblogs with
    advertising revenues
12

 Audiovisual Media Service


 2) Editorial responsibility: the exercise of effective
  control both over the selection of the programmes and
  over their organisation either in a chronological schedule
  or in a catalogue
     Excluded: YouTube, GarageTV
13

 Audiovisual Media Service


 3) Principal purpose
     Excluded: audiovisual content that is merely incidental
        Eg. Animated graphical elements
        Eg. Short advertising spots
        Eg. Journal websites
        Eg. Online games
14

 Audiovisual Media Service


 4) Programmes: set of moving images with or without
  sound
     Excluded: radio, blogs
     Included: films, series, sports
    events, documentaries,…
     Included: EPG, subtitles
15

 Audiovisual Media Service


 5) General public
     Excluded: private correspondance, audiovisual content
      in metro stations, shops

 6) To inform, entertain or educate
     Excluded: images of traffic jam, images of snow in
      skiing areas
16

Audiovisual Media Service: overview




    Source: European Commission, “The Commission Proposal for a Modernisation of the
    Television without Frontiers Directive: Frequently Asked Questions”, MEMO/05/475, 13.12.2005 (http://
    ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/reg/tvwf/modernisation/proposal_2005/index_en.htm)
17

 Regulation: two-tiered approach


 Basic tier: all audiovisual media services
 Additional basic tier: non-linear (pull) services
 Extended tier: Linear (push) services (but simplified
  compared to TVWF)

 Reasons for differentiation
    Degree of choice and control of users
    Impact on society
18

 Regulation: two-tiered approach


 Basic tier
    Information obligation/identification of responsible
     editor
    Prohibition of incitement to hatred based on sex, racial
     or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or
     sexual orientation
    Ensure access for disabled people (‘encourage’)
    Respect copyright
    Basic qualitative requirements for audiovisual
     commercial communications
19

 Regulation: two-tiered approach


 Additional basic tier
    Protection of minors
    Cultural diversity: Promotion of European works
20

 Regulation: two-tiered approach


 Extended tier
    Listed events of major importance for society
   •  Short news reports
   •  Quota for the promotion of European and independent
     works
   •  Quantitative rules for television advertising
   •  Stricter rules for protection of minors
   •  Right of reply
21

 Aggregators


 New actors between network operator and content
  providers: packaging content
     E.g. TV Vlaanderen
 Flemish Media Act: scope
     Broadcasters
     Network operators
 French Community: scope
     Content providers (éditeurs de services)
     Aggregator (distributeurs de services)
     Network operator (opérateurs techniques)
22

 Future: new problems


 Revision of Flemish Media Act
    Modernisation
    Felixibilisation
23




 Bedankt!
 Vragen?
24




         Lefever Katrien
               ICRI
           K.U.Leuven
      Sint Michielsstraat 6
           3000 Leuven
Katrien.lefever@law.kuleuven.be

Maduf02 New Media Legal Implications Katrien Lefever

  • 1.
    New media: legal implications(WP1) Katrien Lefever Peggy Valcke David Stevens
  • 2.
  • 3.
    3 Overview  Actors  Network operators  Broadcasters  Flemish Media Act  Audiovisual Media Services Directive  Aggregators
  • 4.
    4 Network operator  Privatisationof VRT transmission departement  Neutral network operator: guarantee of a non- discriminatory and equitable treatment of all players  Awarding frequencies  Not all frequencies for transmission departement  Tender procedure
  • 5.
    5 Content providers:Flemish Media Act  Scope before May 2007  Private broadcasters (particuliere omroepen): traditional broadcasters  Approval  Detailed obligations  Television services (televisiediensten): video-on- demand, audiovisual fragments on internet,…  Notification  Less detailed obligations
  • 6.
    6 Content providers  Bottlenecks  New media services subjected to disproportional obligations  Independency requirement: no political webTV  => Ad hoc revision Flemish Media Act
  • 7.
    7 Content providers:Flemish Media Act  Scope after May 2007  Private broadcasters (particuliere omroepen): traditional broadcasters  Approval  Television services (televisiediensten): Private broadcasters offering other services to the public. Those services are services defined by art.49-50 ECT and their principal purpose is the provision of programmes.  Notification
  • 8.
    8 Content providers: FlemishMedia Act  Other private broadcasters (andere soorten televisieomroepen): no services defined by art.49-50 ECT and the principal purpose is not the provision of programmes  No approval or notification  No independency requirement  Eg. Political webTV  Eg. user-generated-content  Eg. websites that contain audiovisual elements only in an ancillary manner  Eg. Video on YouTube, GarageTV
  • 9.
    9 Content providers:AVMS Directive  Inspiration for this revision: evolutions at European level  Television without Frontiers Directive (1989)  Scope: traditional broadcasting services  Audiovisual Media Services Directive  Scope: audiovisual media services  Technology neutrality : Linear and non-linear services  Layered regulation
  • 10.
    10 Content providers:AVMS Directive  AVMS is a service  1) as defined by Articles 49 and 50 of the EC Treaty  2) under the editorial responsibility of a media service provider  3) and the principal purpose  4) is the provision of programmes  5) in order to inform, entertain or educate  6) to the general public  7) by electronic communications networks
  • 11.
    11 Audiovisual MediaService  1) Articles 49 and 50 ECT : economic service  Compensation  Excluded: non-commercial websites (no ads)  Included: videoblogs with advertising revenues
  • 12.
    12 Audiovisual MediaService  2) Editorial responsibility: the exercise of effective control both over the selection of the programmes and over their organisation either in a chronological schedule or in a catalogue  Excluded: YouTube, GarageTV
  • 13.
    13 Audiovisual MediaService  3) Principal purpose  Excluded: audiovisual content that is merely incidental  Eg. Animated graphical elements  Eg. Short advertising spots  Eg. Journal websites  Eg. Online games
  • 14.
    14 Audiovisual MediaService  4) Programmes: set of moving images with or without sound  Excluded: radio, blogs  Included: films, series, sports events, documentaries,…  Included: EPG, subtitles
  • 15.
    15 Audiovisual MediaService  5) General public  Excluded: private correspondance, audiovisual content in metro stations, shops  6) To inform, entertain or educate  Excluded: images of traffic jam, images of snow in skiing areas
  • 16.
    16 Audiovisual Media Service:overview Source: European Commission, “The Commission Proposal for a Modernisation of the Television without Frontiers Directive: Frequently Asked Questions”, MEMO/05/475, 13.12.2005 (http:// ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/reg/tvwf/modernisation/proposal_2005/index_en.htm)
  • 17.
    17 Regulation: two-tieredapproach  Basic tier: all audiovisual media services  Additional basic tier: non-linear (pull) services  Extended tier: Linear (push) services (but simplified compared to TVWF)  Reasons for differentiation  Degree of choice and control of users  Impact on society
  • 18.
    18 Regulation: two-tieredapproach  Basic tier  Information obligation/identification of responsible editor  Prohibition of incitement to hatred based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation  Ensure access for disabled people (‘encourage’)  Respect copyright  Basic qualitative requirements for audiovisual commercial communications
  • 19.
    19 Regulation: two-tieredapproach  Additional basic tier  Protection of minors  Cultural diversity: Promotion of European works
  • 20.
    20 Regulation: two-tieredapproach  Extended tier  Listed events of major importance for society •  Short news reports •  Quota for the promotion of European and independent works •  Quantitative rules for television advertising •  Stricter rules for protection of minors •  Right of reply
  • 21.
    21 Aggregators  New actorsbetween network operator and content providers: packaging content  E.g. TV Vlaanderen  Flemish Media Act: scope  Broadcasters  Network operators  French Community: scope  Content providers (éditeurs de services)  Aggregator (distributeurs de services)  Network operator (opérateurs techniques)
  • 22.
    22 Future: newproblems  Revision of Flemish Media Act  Modernisation  Felixibilisation
  • 23.
  • 24.
    24 Lefever Katrien ICRI K.U.Leuven Sint Michielsstraat 6 3000 Leuven Katrien.lefever@law.kuleuven.be