The document discusses how faculty can foster critical thinking among students through online discussions. It begins by defining critical thinking as an intellectually disciplined process of conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information. It then explains that online tools allow faculty to engage students in activities that promote intellectual growth, such as idea generation, coaching discussions, and collaborative projects. However, it notes that not all students have strong critical thinking skills and faculty may need training to effectively structure online discussions. The document provides suggestions for faculty to support critical thinking online, such as starting with offline relationship-building, clearly outlining discussion goals and norms, modeling questioning techniques, and periodically summarizing discussions. It emphasizes the importance of faculty coaching and questioning students
Peeragogy presentation for E3Tech Conference July 28 - July 29
The purpose of Peeragogy and how we can successfully use new platforms and technologies with peer learning strategies to impact the way students learn
Peeragogy presentation for E3Tech Conference July 28 - July 29
The purpose of Peeragogy and how we can successfully use new platforms and technologies with peer learning strategies to impact the way students learn
CORE Education Breakfast series 2014 | Digitising appraisal and inquiryKaren Spencer
These slides accompany the CORE Breakfast series I am facilitating in 2014. Full information and further links here: http://karenmelhuishspencer.com/2014/02/25/my-core-breakfasts-2014-digitising-professional-learning-or-not/
All images used are under CC licences and these, plus references, are in the presenters' notes.
Information literacy through inquiry: using problem-based learning in informa...Alan Carbery
This paper presents the findings of a largely action research project, introducing problem-based information literacy instruction for final year undergraduate nursing and engineering students in Waterford Institute of Technology, Ireland. This paper is based on a research dissertation written for MA in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)Julie Coiro
This presentation was given during a conference for Brazilian educators and students, sponsored by XI Encontro Virtual de Documentação em Software Livre (EVIDOSOL) e VIII Congresso Internacional de Linguagem e Tecnologia online (CILTEC-online). A companion website with links to resources included in this presentation is available at http://coiroevidosol.wikispaces.com/home
Nurturing curiosity and inquiry within the curriculum through the use of tech...RichardM_Walker
How may we engage students in inquiry-led and problem-based learning through the use of technology? In this presentation we will consider how active learning principles can be applied to the design of blended learning courses, with digital tools employed to support active learning opportunities for our students. Through a presentation of case examples from the University of York (United Kingdom), we will consider how blended activities can encourage participants to engage in creative learning and problem-solving. An engagement model for active learning, derived from the case examples, is presented as a stimulus for a broader discussion on effective design approaches to support student-led inquiry and problem-solving activities.
CORE Education Breakfast series 2014 | Digitising appraisal and inquiryKaren Spencer
These slides accompany the CORE Breakfast series I am facilitating in 2014. Full information and further links here: http://karenmelhuishspencer.com/2014/02/25/my-core-breakfasts-2014-digitising-professional-learning-or-not/
All images used are under CC licences and these, plus references, are in the presenters' notes.
Information literacy through inquiry: using problem-based learning in informa...Alan Carbery
This paper presents the findings of a largely action research project, introducing problem-based information literacy instruction for final year undergraduate nursing and engineering students in Waterford Institute of Technology, Ireland. This paper is based on a research dissertation written for MA in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)Julie Coiro
This presentation was given during a conference for Brazilian educators and students, sponsored by XI Encontro Virtual de Documentação em Software Livre (EVIDOSOL) e VIII Congresso Internacional de Linguagem e Tecnologia online (CILTEC-online). A companion website with links to resources included in this presentation is available at http://coiroevidosol.wikispaces.com/home
Nurturing curiosity and inquiry within the curriculum through the use of tech...RichardM_Walker
How may we engage students in inquiry-led and problem-based learning through the use of technology? In this presentation we will consider how active learning principles can be applied to the design of blended learning courses, with digital tools employed to support active learning opportunities for our students. Through a presentation of case examples from the University of York (United Kingdom), we will consider how blended activities can encourage participants to engage in creative learning and problem-solving. An engagement model for active learning, derived from the case examples, is presented as a stimulus for a broader discussion on effective design approaches to support student-led inquiry and problem-solving activities.
A revolution in technology has transformed the way we can find each other, interact and collaborate. This wave of tech helps us to create knowledge as connected learners and to develop the social fabric, capacity, and connectedness found in communities of practice and learning networks. Join Sheryl in this interactive presentation as she explores the question- What should professional learning look like in the 21st Century?
The Non-Disposable Assignment: Enhancing Personalised Learning - Session 2Michael Paskevicius
Slides from our second meeting of three from a course redesign series on creating non-disposable assignments.
As advertised:
Do you want to offer students an opportunity to bring their passions, personal interests, and individual strengths into their coursework?
How can we design assessment which students feel connected to, value, and are proud to share with their peers?
Are you interested in learning how to create a non-disposable assignment for your students?
This 3-part assignment redesign workshop will take you through the steps to create a non-disposable assignment from beginning to end.
Disposable Assignments: "are assignments that students complain about doing and faculty complain about grading. They’re assignments that add no value to the world – after a student spends three hours creating it, a teacher spends 30 minutes grading it, and then the student throws it away” (Wiley, 2013).
This series is about creating a non-disposable assignment. The three sessions will blend a combination of some pre-reading, discussion, and in session time to flesh out the details of a rich assignment that allows students to co-create knowledge, be creative and engage in a personalised learning experience.
We’ll focus on crafting projects which meet your existing or redesigned course learning outcomes, explore tools for students to demonstrate their learning, and identify strategies for conducting peer-review. In the end you’ll end up with plan for implementing your redesigned assignment in Spring 2018 or Fall 2018.
Throughout the three-part workshop we will also be collectively exposing our own learnings to others in the group through a live reflection and blogging site to support our work. We hope faculty can attend all three parts as they are planned with the intent you are coming for the whole series.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Macknight+2000+questions[1]
1. EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY • Number 4 2000
38
T
he amount of information we
receive daily through newspa-
pers, radio, television, and the
Internet is increasing at an unimaginable
rate. The problems and possibilities that
this imposes on our knowledge and
understanding are also increasing.
Having information so readily available
brings with it the expectation that each of
us can and will increase our knowledge
base. To build on what we already know,
however, requires critical thinking. Oth-
erwise, we may fall prey to modern com-
munication media, which present a world
where the prepackaging of intellectual
positions and views is so ingenious that
thinking seems unnecessary.
We want our students to acquire
knowledge and exercise reasoned judg-
ment. They must be able to examine log-
ical relationships among statements of
data, construct arguments, respect
diverse perspectives, view phenomena
from different points of view, and have
the flexibility to recast their thinking
when reason leads them to do so. This,
too, requires critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a common objec-
tive of various disciplines and a goal that
most faculty can aspire to. “Critical
thinking,” as defined by Michael Scriven
and Richard Paul, “is the intellectually
disciplined process of actively and skill-
fully conceptualizing, applying, analyz-
ing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating
information gathered from, or generated
by, observation, experience, reflection,
reasoning, or communication, as a guide
to belief and action.”1
It is a standard of
intellectual excellence required for full
participation in the social, economic,
and political life of our society.
Online Tools and
Collaboration to Support
Critical Inquiry
Critical thinking affects all forms of
communication—speaking, listening,
reading, and writing—and as such can
be practiced daily in every interaction. It
is not a separate activity from problem
solving, creativity, inquiry, or collabora-
tive learning.
With the availability of online discus-
sion and presentation tools, faculty can
engage their students in a wide range of
activities that can contribute to intellec-
tual growth.2
For example, students in
the distance learning environment of the
University of Massachusetts have used
the online Café (WebCT’s chat) for idea
generation and for online help sessions.
The bulletin board offers the possibility
for coaching discussions to take students’
ideas to the next level to deeper, more
intellectual, and reflective learning.
Through e-mail, faculty communicate
with students one-on-one or one-to-
many. Presentation tools give students
the opportunity to work collaboratively
on project planning, peer editing, and
research reports. All these tools can give
students practice in sharpening their
analytical skills.
The concept of collaborative learning
in pairs and groups of students with
shared goals and values that inform deci-
sions and actions has been practiced in
higher education for nearly a decade.
According to Gokhale, “Proponents of
collaborative learning claim that the
active exchange of ideas within small
groups not only increases interest among
the participants but also promotes criti-
cal thinking.”3
Online communication offers the
potential for collaboration as well as
increased participation in the learning
process, reflection, peer tutoring, moni-
Teaching Critical Thinking
through Online Discussions
Faculty can play a key role in fostering critical thinking among students using Web
communication tools
by Carol B. MacKnight
V I E W P O I N T
Critical thinking is a
common objective of
various disciplines and a
goal that most faculty
can aspire to.
2. Number 4 2000 • EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY 39
toring of student learning as it is taking
place, and extension of the classroom
learning. However, online communica-
tion puts emphasis on students’ compre-
hension and knowledge of the elements
of an argument and thus on how to inter-
act with ideas and each other in a mean-
ingful way. We cannot assume that all
students will come with sufficient critical
thinking skills to advance an online dis-
cussion, nor can we assume that faculty
have sufficient skills and practice in mon-
itoring discussions or skills in creating
productive communities of online learn-
ers. Both may need support and training.
Supporting Critical Thinking
Online
Faculty have the responsibility of shap-
ing online discussions and establishing
the classroom culture to support them. It
is unlikely that students will succeed in
substantive, reflective exchanges if they
have not learned to carry on similar con-
versations elsewhere. It may be advisable
to start by conducting some off-line
activities that will give students a better
understanding of the collaborative learn-
ing and communication process. What
are the characteristics of a well-function-
ing group? What are the right questions
to ask?
Going online, students must have a
clear understanding of the goal of the
activity and have the necessary social
skills to:
• ask the right questions,
• listen to each other,
• take turns and share work,
• help each other learn,
• respect each other’s ideas,
• build on each other’s ideas,
• construct their own understanding,
and
• think in new ways.
Sugar and Bonk say “there is no guar-
antee that peer collaboration and inter-
action will trigger critical reflection on
one’s ideas or enhance interpersonal
understanding,” particularly so when
there is no process designed to cultivate
these skills.4
Given the diversity of the
student body in public institutions, it is
insufficient to provide students with the
means to communicate and not support
them with the skillful and active partici-
pation of faculty or facilitators. Students
need coaching and practice in how to
carry on online discussions. Initially, fac-
ulty must step in and support disciplined
discussions by:
• maintaining a focused discussion,
• keeping the discussion intellectually
responsible,
• stimulating the discussion by asking
probing questions that hold students
accountable for their thinking,
• infusing these questions in the minds of
students,
• encouraging full participation, and
• periodically summarizing what has or
needs to be done.
In monitoring discussions or group
work activity, faculty must engage in a
line of questioning that will continue to
drive an idea, thus helping students
develop and apply critical thinking skills.
Online, asynchronous conversations
allow for giving and accepting feedback
and for greater reflection. It is important,
then, for online participants to be aware
of the significance of their responses and
learn to ask good questions of themselves
and of others.
Questions that focus on the fundamen-
tals of thought and reasoning form the
baseline of critical thinking. It is the role
of the faculty to coach learning and prob-
lem solving by modeling questioning
techniques that enhance social interac-
tion and dialogue.5
Given sufficient prac-
tice, students will incorporate more of
the questioning techniques and become
capable of peer mentoring in carrying on
substantive, online discussions.
Asking the Right Questions
In any discipline, the level of questions
asked influences the depth of thinking
that occurs. For example, if students are
asked to name the closest planet to the
earth, the response will most likely be a
memorized fact. Thought-provoking
questions require that students go
beyond facts and use knowledge (recog-
nizing assumptions, implications, and
consequences) in the exercise of judg-
ment. Critical thinking questions tend to
generate more questions in both the
questioner and responder, engaging stu-
dents in thinking in the discipline they
are studying.
A process needs to be designed that
cultivates these skills with faculty taking
the responsibility for modeling thinking
and then at some point letting students
accept more of the responsibility. It starts
with a “focus question” or dialogue such
as, “How do good readers read?” “What
are the activities involved?” “What are the
levels of reading?” “How would you
approach different types of reading mat-
ter?” It continues with faculty raising
questions that drive thinking, asking for
clarification or elaboration. In a problem-
solving example, faculty might ask stu-
dents questions that build on issues of
support, reasons, evidence, assumptions,
implications, and consequences related
to the “focus question.” Table 1 suggests
questions for exploring ideas and state-
ments in depth.6
Faculty and students can
use these kinds of questions as a guide in
Online, asynchronous
conversations allow for
giving and accepting
feedback and for greater
reflection.
3. EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY • Number 4 2000
40
examining the quality of thinking in
response to “focus questions.”
In her research on using questioning
to teach critical thinking, King found
that when students are given exemplar
questions and coaching their learning is
“markedly enhanced.”7
In addition, the
approach can serve students’ own needs
to share ideas and to recognize mistakes,
misunderstandings, and confusion as a
strength, not as a failure.8
Discussion Formats
There are a number of collaborative
activities that students can participate in
online where critical thinking can be
practiced. The discussion on reading
above could well have taken place in an
online expanded group format (seminar
group) where the “focus question” is dis-
cussed with peers and instructors. Some
other discussion formats that help pro-
mote critical thinking and task analysis
include:
• Small group discussions led by an
instructor or group leader
• Buzz groups consisting of two people
who discuss issues or problems for a
short period
• Case discussions using real or simu-
lated complex problems to be ana-
lyzed in detail and a solution or deci-
sion offered
• Debating teams where students
improve their critical thinking skills by
formulating ideas, defending their
positions, and countering the opposi-
tion’s reasoning or conclusions
• Jigsaw groups where members break
into subgroups to discuss various parts
of a topic and then are responsible for
presenting or teaching the informa-
tion to the other members
• Mock trials where students assume the
various roles of individuals in a real
trial setting
These online collaborative formats
have the potential for increased student
interaction, debate, and reflection; close
Table 1:
Socratic Questioning Prompts
Questions for Clarification
• What do you mean by ________?
• What is your main point?
• How does ________ relate to ________?
• Could you put it another way?
• What do you think is the main issue here?
• Let me see if I understand you: do you mean ________ or ________?
• Jane, could you summarize in your own words what Richard has said?
• Richard, is that what you meant?
• Could you give me an example?
• Would this be an example: ________?
• Could you explain that further?
Questions about the Initial Question or Issue
• How can we find out?
• What does this question assume?
• Would ________ put the question differently?
• Can we break this question down at all?
• Does this question lead to other questions or issues?
Questions that Probe Assumptions
• What are you assuming?
• What could we assume instead?
• You seem to be assuming ________. Do I understand you correctly?
• How would you justify taking this for granted?
• Is this always the case? Why do you think the assumption holds here?
Questions that Probe Reasons and Evidence
• What would be an example?
• Could you explain your reasons to us?
• Are those reasons adequate?
• Do you have any evidence for that?
• How could we find out if that is true?
Questions that Probe Origin or Source Questions
• Where did you get this idea?
• Have you been influenced by media?
• What caused you to feel this way?
Questions that Probe Implications and Consequences
• What are you implying by that?
• What effect would that have?
• What is an alternative?
• If this is the case, then what else must be true?
Questions aboutViewpoints or Perspectives
• How would other groups of people respond? Why?
• How could you answer the objection that ___ would make?
• Can anyone see this another way?
• What would someone who disagrees say?
Selected questions from a list compiled by Richard Paul, in CriticalThinking:What Every
Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly ChangingWorld (Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical
Thinking and Moral Critique, 1990). Used with permission.
4. Number 4 2000 • EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY 41
monitoring of students’ critical thinking
skills; and time-and-space-independent
extension of the classroom learning.
Conclusion
Unless the pedagogical role of faculty
includes modeling, coaching, question-
ing, reflection, and task structuring, it
will be difficult for online discussions to
escape the superficiality of classroom
talk. In the didactic approach to teach-
ing, faculty have not had to be concerned
with designing structures to engage stu-
dents in critical thinking exercises or to
hold them responsible for their way of
thinking. The question is whether faculty
can change their teaching strategies to
use online communication tools effec-
tively to help every member in the class
go beyond being exposed to content to
the point of critically interacting with it.
Teaching critical thinking through
online discussion is an important strat-
egy in advancing teaching and learning
in electronic forums. Students need to
develop and apply critical thinking skills
to their studies, to the complex problems
they will face in the future in order to
compete and survive, and to “the critical
choices they will be forced to make as a
result of the information explosion and
other rapid technological changes.”9
e
Endnotes:
1. M. Scriven and R. Paul, “Defining critical think-
ing: A draft statement for the National Council
for Excellence in Critical Thinking.” [http://
www.criticalthinking.org/university/defining.
html]
2. N. A. Diamond, “Adding On-line Computer
Methods to Your Repertoire of Teaching Strate-
gies,” Excellence 9(6), University of Illinois: Center
for Teaching, 1997–98.
3. A. A. Gokhale, “Collaborative Learning Enhances
Critical Thinking,” Journal of Technology Education,
fall 1995. [http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/
JTE/v7n1/pdf/gokhale.pdf]
4. W. A. Sugar, and C. J. Bonk, “Student Role Play
in the World Forum: Analyses of an Arctic
Adventure Learning Apprenticeship,” in C. J.
Bonk and K. S. King (eds.), Electronic Collaborators
(Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Publishers, 1998), p. 133.
5. S. A. Barab and T. M. Duffy, “From Practice Fields
to Communities of Practice,” in D. H. Jonassen
and S. M. Land (eds.), Theoretical Foundations of
Learning Environments (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
baum Associates, Publishers, 2000).
6. R. Paul, Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to
Survive in a Rapidly Changing World (Rohnert Park,
CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Cri-
tique, 1990).
7. A. King, “Designing the instructional process to
enhance critical thinking across the curriculum:
Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using
questioning to teach critical thinking,” Teaching of
Psychology, 22(1), 13.
8. R. Paul, How to Teach through Socratic Questioning
(Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Think-
ing, 1996).
9. H. Oliver and R. Utermohlen, “An Innovative
Teaching Strategy: Using Critical Thinking to
Give Students a Guide to the Future.” ERIC Doc-
ument Reproduction Service No 389702, 1995.
Carol B. MacKnight (cmacknight@oit.umass.edu) is an
instructional technologist in the Office of Information
Technologies at the University of Massachusetts and is
the founder and editor of the Journal of Computing
in Higher Education.
NERCOMP
a n E D U C A U S E a f f i l i a t e
North East Regional Computing Program
March 18–20, 2001
Centrum Centre Arena and Convention Center
Worcester, Massachusetts
E-learning:
Enhancing Education In and Out of the Classroom
Support
Policy
Instructional Services
Infrastructure
Visit the EDUCAUSE Web site for more information
www.educause.edu