Literate Environment Analysis Presentation 
By: Kim Thomas 
EDUC 6706: The Beginning Reader, PreK–3
Getting to know literacy learners 
• Cognitive assessment 
• Re- telling and comprehension questions were utilized for this unit.- Following each 
oral reading passage, students are expected to demonstrate their comprehension of 
the text. The reading process information that we collect during oral reading is thus 
complemented by product information: students’ understanding of the reading 
passages, as determined by student’ comprehension- question responses and 
retellings (Afflerbach, 2012). 
• Reading inventories, in one form or another, have existed for as long as teachers 
have been interested in better understanding their students’ reading development. 
Teachers who carefully analyze their students’ oral reading, check their students’ 
fluency, encourage their students to retell what they have read, and ask a series of 
comprehension questions gather useful assessment information that helps inventory 
student reading behaviors and achievement (Afflerbach, 2012).
Selecting Texts 
• Linguistic and Informational texts- Non- fiction books, or 
informational texts, are a pertinent way to get students to acquire 
knowledge through it’s validity. Linguistic texts are word oriented and 
allows students to gain schema through their content. 
• On the Literacy Matrix for selecting texts (Hartman, 2010), the book I 
chose would be under linguistic and informational. It is very word 
oriented, although simple words, which are age appropriate for 
kindergarten students. It is also informational in that it is non- fiction 
and states only facts for the students to carry on with them.
Interactive Perspective 
• Strategic processing- Developing student’s schema by questioning 
their knowledge on a certain topic using picture walks. 
• In the stage of pre-reading, students prepare to read by setting 
purposes, thinking about the topic and genre of the text, and 
planning for the reading experience. This allows the students to 
activate background knowledge, predict, question, and set a purpose 
(Tompkins, 2010) which is the way in which I utilized this technique.
Critical and Response Perspective 
• Metacognition- By incorporating metacognition in my lesson, it heightened 
the student’s ability to critically view and analyze the text. It also allows 
them to express their individuality. 
• Including the critical and response perspectives in literacy instruction can 
prepare students to think critically about important issues in their lives, 
become productive and contributing members of society and respect 
individual, cultural, religious, and racial differences by allowing them to 
personally and emotionally connect to the text. The critical perspective 
allows students to think more deeply about a text, critically view multiple 
perspectives, think analytically about a text, and to question everything. 
The response perspective allows the students to respond personally to a 
text, reflect on the text, and ensure that they are taking risks when they are 
responding to the text (Laureate Education Producer, n.d.).
Colleague and Parent Feedback 
Parent: The insights that I gained were that teachers use many different strategies, (some of which I was unaware of) to make 
it easier for children to comprehend reading. The information in the presentation may change my practices by giving me 
different ways to help my son comprehend his reading. If one practice is not working well for him, I can try another. 
You can support me by being consistent with my child and remembering that what works for one child, may not work for 
another. I can support you by staying consistent with the strategy that you are using in your classroom. Being consistent in 
the classroom and also at home makes it easier for the child and also keeps the teacher and parents on the same page. 
Colleague: I found the entire presentation to be very enlightening as well as insightful, especially as it pertains to linguistic 
and informational texts and their practices. It was interesting to learn that students can utilize such texts in order to gain and 
build upon knowledge. Additionally, I feel that most educators naturally practice the critical and response perspective, but 
through this presentation, I was reminded, as well as learned more about the varying reasons as to why and how this 
perspective is beneficial to all students. Through this presentation, I have now acquired a newfound knowledge of linguistic 
and informational texts, and I am eager to introduce this literary practice with my students. On most occasions I personally 
have chosen to present fictional texts, with the idea that this type of literature helped to engage and peak the interest of my 
students; however having now learned more about linguistic and informational texts, I feel as though this practice is one that 
would greatly benefit my students, as well as drive my literacy instruction. Collaboration amongst teachers is an extremely 
important aspect within the education field. I believe Kim could support the literacy development of my students by 
informing me of the many research based practices that she has learned and continues to learn throughout her graduate 
education. Likewise, I plan to support Kim in her work with students by informing her of such practices that I know have been 
successful in the field through my experiences. Supporting and collaborating with other educators in regards to ideas and 
techniques can be immensely profitable for all. After viewing this presentation, I would like to learn more about the Literacy 
Matrix. As a teacher of Special Education, I feel it would be helpful to gain more knowledge in regards to this topic, as it could 
possibly help to better differentiate my literary instruction for students with disabilities who are developing early literacy 
skills. 
•

Literate environment Analysis Presentation

  • 1.
    Literate Environment AnalysisPresentation By: Kim Thomas EDUC 6706: The Beginning Reader, PreK–3
  • 2.
    Getting to knowliteracy learners • Cognitive assessment • Re- telling and comprehension questions were utilized for this unit.- Following each oral reading passage, students are expected to demonstrate their comprehension of the text. The reading process information that we collect during oral reading is thus complemented by product information: students’ understanding of the reading passages, as determined by student’ comprehension- question responses and retellings (Afflerbach, 2012). • Reading inventories, in one form or another, have existed for as long as teachers have been interested in better understanding their students’ reading development. Teachers who carefully analyze their students’ oral reading, check their students’ fluency, encourage their students to retell what they have read, and ask a series of comprehension questions gather useful assessment information that helps inventory student reading behaviors and achievement (Afflerbach, 2012).
  • 3.
    Selecting Texts •Linguistic and Informational texts- Non- fiction books, or informational texts, are a pertinent way to get students to acquire knowledge through it’s validity. Linguistic texts are word oriented and allows students to gain schema through their content. • On the Literacy Matrix for selecting texts (Hartman, 2010), the book I chose would be under linguistic and informational. It is very word oriented, although simple words, which are age appropriate for kindergarten students. It is also informational in that it is non- fiction and states only facts for the students to carry on with them.
  • 4.
    Interactive Perspective •Strategic processing- Developing student’s schema by questioning their knowledge on a certain topic using picture walks. • In the stage of pre-reading, students prepare to read by setting purposes, thinking about the topic and genre of the text, and planning for the reading experience. This allows the students to activate background knowledge, predict, question, and set a purpose (Tompkins, 2010) which is the way in which I utilized this technique.
  • 5.
    Critical and ResponsePerspective • Metacognition- By incorporating metacognition in my lesson, it heightened the student’s ability to critically view and analyze the text. It also allows them to express their individuality. • Including the critical and response perspectives in literacy instruction can prepare students to think critically about important issues in their lives, become productive and contributing members of society and respect individual, cultural, religious, and racial differences by allowing them to personally and emotionally connect to the text. The critical perspective allows students to think more deeply about a text, critically view multiple perspectives, think analytically about a text, and to question everything. The response perspective allows the students to respond personally to a text, reflect on the text, and ensure that they are taking risks when they are responding to the text (Laureate Education Producer, n.d.).
  • 6.
    Colleague and ParentFeedback Parent: The insights that I gained were that teachers use many different strategies, (some of which I was unaware of) to make it easier for children to comprehend reading. The information in the presentation may change my practices by giving me different ways to help my son comprehend his reading. If one practice is not working well for him, I can try another. You can support me by being consistent with my child and remembering that what works for one child, may not work for another. I can support you by staying consistent with the strategy that you are using in your classroom. Being consistent in the classroom and also at home makes it easier for the child and also keeps the teacher and parents on the same page. Colleague: I found the entire presentation to be very enlightening as well as insightful, especially as it pertains to linguistic and informational texts and their practices. It was interesting to learn that students can utilize such texts in order to gain and build upon knowledge. Additionally, I feel that most educators naturally practice the critical and response perspective, but through this presentation, I was reminded, as well as learned more about the varying reasons as to why and how this perspective is beneficial to all students. Through this presentation, I have now acquired a newfound knowledge of linguistic and informational texts, and I am eager to introduce this literary practice with my students. On most occasions I personally have chosen to present fictional texts, with the idea that this type of literature helped to engage and peak the interest of my students; however having now learned more about linguistic and informational texts, I feel as though this practice is one that would greatly benefit my students, as well as drive my literacy instruction. Collaboration amongst teachers is an extremely important aspect within the education field. I believe Kim could support the literacy development of my students by informing me of the many research based practices that she has learned and continues to learn throughout her graduate education. Likewise, I plan to support Kim in her work with students by informing her of such practices that I know have been successful in the field through my experiences. Supporting and collaborating with other educators in regards to ideas and techniques can be immensely profitable for all. After viewing this presentation, I would like to learn more about the Literacy Matrix. As a teacher of Special Education, I feel it would be helpful to gain more knowledge in regards to this topic, as it could possibly help to better differentiate my literary instruction for students with disabilities who are developing early literacy skills. •