Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Â
Library wrap 2003 version
1. 1
Wrapping the Gift?Wrapping the Gift?
Evaluating the School
Library Program
LIB 620 Library Management
Fall 2010
2. 2
What are school librariesWhat are school libraries forfor??
The Mission of the SchoolThe Mission of the School
LibraryLibrary
â The school library provides
information and ideas that are
fundamental to functioning
successfully in todayâs information and
knowledge-based society. The school
library equips students with life-long learning
skills and develops the imagination, enabling
them to live as responsible citizens.
IFLA/UNESCO School Library Manifesto
2
3. 3
AASL MissionAASL Mission
The mission of the school libraryThe mission of the school library
media program is to ensure that themedia program is to ensure that the
students and staff are effective usersstudents and staff are effective users
of ideas and information. The schoolof ideas and information. The school
library media specialist empowerslibrary media specialist empowers
students to be critical thinkers,students to be critical thinkers,
enthusiastic readers, skillfulenthusiastic readers, skillful
researchers, and ethical users ofresearchers, and ethical users of
information . . .information . . .
â Empowering Learners (2009).
3
4. 4
What about school librarians?What about school librarians?
4
Roles and ResponsibilitiesRoles and Responsibilities
of the School Library Media Specialistof the School Library Media Specialist
â Leader
â Instructional Partner
â Information Specialist
â Teacher
â Program Administrator
5. 5
More on the role of the LMSMore on the role of the LMS
Guiding principlesGuiding principles
â Principle One: School libraries have no
boundaries.
â Principle Two: Library and information
professionals should be flexible.
â Principle Three: Ensure that students are
effective users of ideas and information.
â Principle Four: Information is everywhere,
essential, and central.
⢠Lowe, C. A.
The Role of the School Library Media Specialist in the 21st Centu
. ERIC Digest. 2000-11-00
5
6. 6
Another way to look at itAnother way to look at it
Three critical areas of servicesThree critical areas of services
1. Information access and delivery
⢠The school library media specialist who has a
solid foundation in evaluating information,
has technological expertise in retrieving and
organizing information, and maintains a
commitment to intellectual freedom, is able
to create an information-rich learning
environment within the school.
â Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Prep
(2003), p. 7.
6
7. 7
More fromMore from NCATE StandardsNCATE Standards
Three critical areas of servicesThree critical areas of services
2. Teaching and learning
⢠Earlier versions of the school library media
specialist program focused on a consultancy
role and stressed locational guidance, but
current practice demands a true
partnership role, in which the school
library media specialist and classroom
teacher are engaged together throughout
the instructional process.
â Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Pr
(2003), p. 7.
7
8. 8
More fromMore from NCATE StandardsNCATE Standards
Three critical areas of servicesThree critical areas of services
3. Program administration
⢠The school library media specialist must
understand management and change, must
communicate clearly, and must be prepared
to take tactical risks. In addition, librarians
must advocate for support and must create an
environment that contributes to student
achievement. . . . Therefore, the effective
school library media specialist will exhibit
leadership skills among colleagues . . .
â Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Preparat
(2003), p. 7.
8
10. 10
LeadershipLeadership
Are there many typesAre there many types
of leaders?of leaders?
â Appointed Leaders
â Expert Leaders
â Interpersonal Leaders
â Social/Informal Leaders
⢠Are you a âborn leaderâ? If not, you can develop
skills to help you become an effective leader. Just
as you become a better teacher through
experience, you'll become more comfortable as a
leader over time.
⢠The Teacher Librarian as Manager
10
12. 12
The Kentucky Department of EducationThe Kentucky Department of Education
recommends the following resources:recommends the following resources:
â Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning (Li
)
â School Library Media Program Rubric
â School Media Librarian Evaluation Instrument
12
14. 14
Preemptive Action:
The busy librarianâs guide to
program evaluation
Based in part on:Based in part on:
A workshop developed by theA workshop developed by the
Pennsylvania School Librarians AssociationPennsylvania School Librarians Association
Professional Development CommitteeProfessional Development Committee
((No longer available online)No longer available online)
indicates the slide was originally from the above presentation
15. 15
WhatWhat isis evaluation?evaluation?[[11]]
As defined by theAs defined by the
American Evaluation AssociationAmerican Evaluation Association::
â evaluation involves assessing the strengths and
weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel,
products, and organizations to improve their
effectiveness.
â Evaluation is the systematic collection and analysis
of data needed to make decisions
⢠Evaluation Definition: What is Evaluation?
16. 16
What aboutWhat about school library programschool library program evaluation?evaluation?
Evaluation ofEvaluation of
school library media centers:school library media centers:
â When you examine something or
someone, you examine the subject and
make a judgment about the quality,
significance, or condition of whatever is to
be evaluated.
⢠Emanuel T. Prostano and Joyce S. Prostano,
The School Library Media Center 5th
ed. (Englewood, CO:
Libraries Unlimited, 1999), 44.
17. 17
Purposes of evaluationPurposes of evaluation
To find out what is rightTo find out what is right
To find out what is wrongTo find out what is wrong
⢠Summary of definition in Blanche Woolls, The School
Library Media Manager 2nd
ed. (Westport, CT: Libraries
Unlimited, 1999).
18. 18
What can you evaluate?
Everything!Everything!
â Collection
â Personnel
â Library Layout
â Programs
â Curriculum collaboration
â Reference
service/collection:
⢠Interview skills
⢠Quality of the answers
provided
⢠Satisfaction of your
patrons
â Students or teachersâor
other school staff
19. 19
WhatWhat shouldshould you evaluate?you evaluate?
That depends . . .That depends . . .
â On your priorities
â On your economic needs and situation
â On the policies and procedures established by your
school, school district and/or state
â On how much time you have left over from your other
duties to devote to planning and executing an
evaluation project
20. 20
Why evaluate?Why evaluate?
Because you have toBecause you have to
â Continuous assessment of services can be an
ongoing requirement for accreditation/funding,
etc.
Because you want toBecause you want to
â You want to find out how well youâre doing
â You want to find out how well others think
youâre doing
â You want to find ways to improve your service
21. 21
Why Evaluate?
⢠Schools are being evaluated by student
academic achievement in reading,
writing and math.
⢠Recent studies show student
achievement correlates positively with
effective school library programs.
22. 22
Why Evaluate?Why Evaluate?
Studies show the positive correlation withStudies show the positive correlation with
student achievement occurs when there is anstudent achievement occurs when there is an
effective school library program [and]:effective school library program [and]:
â School librarians are full time and
â Librarians collaborate with teachers on
instructional planning.
23. 23
Why Evaluate?Why Evaluate?
Studies also show anStudies also show an
effective school library programeffective school library program
includesincludes
the following attributes:the following attributes:
â Quality collections;
â Increased hours of access beyond school day;
â Professional development for teachers and
librarians;
â Student access to technology; and
â Collaboration with other types of libraries.
24. 24
Why Evaluate? Because. . .Why Evaluate? Because. . .
To improve, the librarian mustTo improve, the librarian must
have baseline data about the program.have baseline data about the program.
To be relevant, the librarian must knowTo be relevant, the librarian must know
if the library services and resources areif the library services and resources are
aligned with the schoolâs goals foraligned with the schoolâs goals for
student achievement.student achievement.
To build a case for better support, theTo build a case for better support, the
librarian needs data that demonstrateslibrarian needs data that demonstrates
the value of the program.the value of the program.
25. 25
An evaluation enables you to:An evaluation enables you to:
â Determine success in attaining program goals.
â Determine studentsâ and teachersâ needs so they can
be incorporated into the program.
â Provide a basis for resource allocation.
â Recognize strengths and accomplishments.
â Examine the impact of the program on
student learning.
What Can an Evaluation
Do?
⢠Nancy Everhart,
Evaluating the School Library Media Center
, 1998)
26. 26
It makes senseâIt makes senseâ
ď Focus data collecting andFocus data collecting and
evaluation on those components of aevaluation on those components of a
school library program that theschool library program that the
research shows correlate with studentresearch shows correlate with student
achievement.achievement.
27. 27
Types of Evaluation
ď Formal
ď Informal
ď External
ď Internal
ď Formative
ď During a program
ď Summative
ď After the program is completed
28. 28
Evaluation requires standardsEvaluation requires standards
How do you know if the media centerHow do you know if the media center
is âgoodâ/ ânot goodâ or even âgood enoughâ?is âgoodâ/ ânot goodâ or even âgood enoughâ?
â âGood enoughâ for what? For whom?
Guidelines or rubrics or objectives for collections,Guidelines or rubrics or objectives for collections,
performance, etc. can be found in:performance, etc. can be found in:
â
29. 29
Types of Data
QuantitativeQuantitative QualitativeQualitative
Number of OPACNumber of OPAC
searchessearches
Size of collectionSize of collection
Number ofNumber of
lessons plannedlessons planned
with teacherswith teachers
Studentsâ success rate inStudentsâ success rate in
locating appropriatelocating appropriate
resources in OPAC searchesresources in OPAC searches
Collection supports theCollection supports the
curriculumcurriculum
Comprehensive andComprehensive and
collaborative planning is incollaborative planning is in
placeplace
33. 33
Interpretation means creating goals andInterpretation means creating goals and
objectivesobjectives
The purpose and study goals should determineThe purpose and study goals should determine
the types of methods and measures you use tothe types of methods and measures you use to
conduct the evaluationconduct the evaluation
Objectives will define your standard ofObjectives will define your standard of
excellence--the minimum level of appropriateexcellence--the minimum level of appropriate
service for your particular clienteleservice for your particular clientele
â Jo Bell Whitlach, Evaluating Reference Services
34. 34
Methods of EvaluationMethods of Evaluation
ObtrusiveObtrusive
â People are aware of the evaluation
⢠Self-evaluation
⢠Surveys
⢠Observation
UnobtrusiveUnobtrusive
â data collection that does not require intrusion into
the lives of participants by investigators
⢠Glossary for Responsible Conduct in Data Management
â People are unaware of the evaluation
⢠Unobtrusive measures of physical facilities
⢠Use of proxiesââmystery patronsâ
35. 35
Obtrusive reference evaluations in a schoolObtrusive reference evaluations in a school
library contextlibrary context
Questionnaires orQuestionnaires or
interviews of students or teachersinterviews of students or teachers
Numbers gathering:Numbers gathering:
â Reference question counts
â Numbers/types of reference books used
â Circulation statistics
ObservationObservation
â By external observer
â Self-observation: Journal
36. 36
Evaluation ModelEvaluation Model
1.1. Define the question.Define the question.
2.2. Collect data--determine needed data andCollect data--determine needed data and
method of collection.method of collection.
3.3. Analyze the data.Analyze the data.
4.4. Formulate recommendations.Formulate recommendations.
5.5. Develop an action plan.Develop an action plan.
37. 37
Research FindingResearch Finding
Students whose school
librarian plays an
instructional role
tend to achieve higher
than average scores.
What data are
needed to
determine whether
or not the school
librarian plays an
instructional role
in the school?
The QuestionThe Question
Evaluation Model Step 1.
Define the Question
39. 39
Empowering LearnersEmpowering Learners
Building collaborative partnerships:Building collaborative partnerships:
â Guideline:
⢠The school library media program
promotes collaboration among members of
the learning community and encourages
learners to be independent, lifelong users
and producers of ideas and information
â Empowering learners, p. 20.
39
40. 40
Addressing multiple literacies:Addressing multiple literacies:
â Guideline:
⢠The school library media program
provides instruction that addresses
multiple literacies, including information
literacy, media literacy, visual literacy, and
technology literacy.
â p. 23.
According toAccording to Empowering LearnersEmpowering Learners
41. 41
Determine the type needed.Determine the type needed.
â Quantitative/Qualitative
Determine the method of collection.Determine the method of collection.
â Existing statistic
â Survey, questionnaire, focus group, observation
Evaluation Model Step 2.
Collect data
42. 42
â Identify areas of agreement and disagreement
among groups.
â Identify areas of strength and areas that need
improvement.
â Identify areas where more data is needed.
ď How can the data be analyzed to determineHow can the data be analyzed to determine
whether or not the librarian plays an effectivewhether or not the librarian plays an effective
instructional role in the school?instructional role in the school?
Evaluation Model Step 3.
Analyze the data
48. 48
Back to Step 2Back to Step 2
Collecting More Data âCollecting More Data â
Focus GroupsFocus Groups
1.1. How are student products and performancesHow are student products and performances
assessed in units involving use of the library?assessed in units involving use of the library?
2.2. How do you determine the products andHow do you determine the products and
performances to demonstrate mastery of contentperformances to demonstrate mastery of content
in units involving use of the library?in units involving use of the library?
3.3. What is the role of reflection in student workWhat is the role of reflection in student work
involving use of the library?involving use of the library?
49. 49
⢠Review the data, formulate recommendations.Review the data, formulate recommendations.
⢠For example:For example:
â Because of the strong correlation between the
school librarianâs instructional role and student
achievement, the Advisory Committee establishes
a three year goal of reaching the Exemplary level
in all target indicators in the Teaching and
Learning Rubric
ď Role of an Advisory Committee ofRole of an Advisory Committee of
stakeholdersâstakeholdersâ
Evaluation Model Step 4.
Analyze the data
50. 50Example:Example:
Recommendations for First YearRecommendations for First Year
â Review the Standards for the
21st
Century Learner to ensure
they align with content standards
and set student expectations for analysis,
evaluation and inquiry.
â Meet with teaching teams to solicit
recommended revisions.
â Convene a workshop for new teachers to
review the standards.
ď Standards for the 21Standards for the 21stst Century LearnerCentury Learner
Adapted from
51. 51Example:Example:
Recommendations for First YearRecommendations for First Year
Collaborative PlanningCollaborative Planning
â Establish regular common planning time for
teachers with the library media staff.
Curriculum DevelopmentCurriculum Development
â Review school policies to remove any barriers
that prevent librarians from participating in
building and district curriculum sessions.
52. 52Example:Example:
Recommendations for First YearRecommendations for First Year
Reading, Writing, Speaking, ViewingReading, Writing, Speaking, Viewing
â Provide a series of author workshops and develop
plans with teachers for student reading, writing,
speaking, and viewing responses to the author
workshops.
â Involve Parents.
Effective TeachingEffective Teaching
â Clarify conflicting feedback through focus groups
targeting use of assessment, differentiation, &
inquiry in instruction.
â Develop recommendations based on new data.
53. 53
Library staff develop an action plan for eachLibrary staff develop an action plan for each
recommendation.recommendation.
The Advisory Committee of StakeholdersThe Advisory Committee of Stakeholders
reviews and approves the action plans.reviews and approves the action plans.
Evaluation Model Step 5.
Develop an action
plan
54. 54
Action Plan Example:
Target Indicator:
Curriculum development is modeled and promoted
ObjectiveObjective ActivityActivity DocumentationDocumentation ParticipantsParticipants NewNew
ResourcesResources
CompletionCompletion
DateDate
Review barriersReview barriers
preventingpreventing
librarians fromlibrarians from
participating inparticipating in
curriculumcurriculum
sessions.sessions.
ReviewReview
policiespolicies
School CouncilSchool Council
minutesminutes
SchoolSchool
Council &Council &
admin.admin.
NoneNone
projectedprojected
Sept. 1Sept. 1
SecureSecure
scheduleschedule
Post schedule inPost schedule in
lib. & faculty rm.lib. & faculty rm.
PrincipalPrincipal NoneNone Sept. 10Sept. 10
ParticipateParticipate
in mtgs.in mtgs.
Meeting minutesMeeting minutes LibrariansLibrarians NoneNone
projectedprojected
June 1June 1
ReportReport
backback
Faculty mtg.Faculty mtg.
minutesminutes
LibrariansLibrarians NoneNone MonthlyMonthly
WrittenWritten
materialmaterial
In professionalIn professional
librarylibrary
LibrariansLibrarians NoneNone Within 5Within 5
days of mtgdays of mtg
55. 55
This example of an evaluation
wasâŚ
⢠Type (which one?)Type (which one?)
â Formal
â Internal
â Formative
⢠Data collection methods:Data collection methods:
â Research
â Rubric-based
questionnaire
â Focus Group
⢠Data type:Data type:
â Quantitative
â Qualitative
56. 56
Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 1Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 1
Unobtrusive measures of physical facilitiesUnobtrusive measures of physical facilities
â âThe basic premise . . . is that you can learn a
great deal . . . by looking at how things wear
(âerosionâ), how things are left in the building
(âtracesâ) and how things are rearranged
(âadaptations for useâ).â
⢠Nancy Everhart, Evaluating the School Library
Media Center: Analysis Techniques and
Research Practices. Libraries Unlimited, 1998.
57. 57
Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 2Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 2
Use of proxiesââmystery patronsâUse of proxiesââmystery patronsâ
â Technique used more often in academic libraries
and government documents reference services
⢠Half-right reference: the 55% rule
⢠5-minute rule
â Peter Hernon and Charles R. McClure, âUnobtrusive
Reference Testing: The 55 Percent Ruleâ Library Journal
April 15, 1986, 37-41.
⢠âItâs not true, and now we know why . . . the so-called
â55% ruleâ has never been tested against a truly
representative field sample.â
â John V. Richardson, Jr., âReference Is Better Than We
Thought,â Library Journal April 15, 2002, 41-42.
58. 58
Importance of a sophisticated modelImportance of a sophisticated model
Richardson:Richardson:
â âThe reference service performance model [that led to
the 55% rule] was overly simplistic, samples were way
too small, and the test questions were not representative
of real-world reference questions.â
â âStudents of reference service should learn about the
existence of multiple performance outcomes (i.e.,
accuracy, utility, and satisfaction) and to recognize that
each outcome is driven by different factors.â
⢠âReference Is Better Than We Thought.â
59. 59
Characteristics of good modelsCharacteristics of good models
Measures of reference service must beMeasures of reference service must be
â Valid
⢠They âaccurately reflect the concept being studied.â
â Reliable
⢠They âare stable and dependable, and provide
consistent results with each repeated use.â
â Practical
⢠They ârequire that data be relatively easy to collect.â
â Useful
⢠They âprovide information that can be used to
improve reference services.â
â Whitlach, Evaluating Reference Services.
60. 60
Problems of Evaluation in School ContextProblems of Evaluation in School Context
Often the school librarianis the only oneOften the school librarianis the only one
working in the libraryworking in the library
An evaluation project can be time-An evaluation project can be time-
consuming to plan and to put into actionconsuming to plan and to put into action
61. 61
Solutions to evaluation problemsSolutions to evaluation problems
Depends on your local situationDepends on your local situation
â Your resources:
⢠Time, money, available warm bodies
â You and your creativity
Make evaluation part of your routineMake evaluation part of your routine
â As you plan/prepare your program(s), include
an evaluation component
⢠Appropriate, affordable, accessible, accountable
Seek collaborative partners wheneverSeek collaborative partners whenever
possiblepossible
62. 62
Find out more in LIB 604!Find out more in LIB 604!
LIB 604 Libraries in theLIB 604 Libraries in the
School CurriculumSchool Curriculum
â An approach to understanding the role of the
library media specialist and the media center in the
school curriculum, with the aim of developing the
school as a learning community, stressing
collaboration between administrators, teachers and
librarians in planning learning experiences.
â Offered Spring semesters
â Includes a Collaborative Action
Research assignment.
â See What is Collaborative Action
Research?
62
Activity #1: OPENING ACTIVITY. Ask how many in the audience have designed a program evaluation (show of hands). Ask various people to share the focus of their evaluationâwas it a total program evaluation, an evaluation of the collection, a facility or services evaluation, etc.? Most groups should respond with some of these topics. Make the point that most of the topics shared will fit within the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) Rubric categories of: Teaching and Learning; Information Access and Delivery; and Program Administration. Presenter asks participants to turn to rubric. Go to page 35 of the book A Planning Guide for Information Power, Building Partnerships for Learning.
Divide the participants into small groups. If the set-up is one with tables, each table can be a group. Give each group three index cards or post-it notes. Somewhere in the room ( wall/chalk board/flip charts), post the three headings from the rubric:
Teaching and LearningInformation Access and DeliveryProgram Administration
Give the following directions:
Each group has three votes. Take ten minutes to review the rubric and identify the three target indicators you believe represent the most important elements to evaluate in a school library media program to determine whether it is positioned to influence student achievement. Post your votes under the appropriate heading.
 Highlight the target indicators in each category. Ask the group for some feedback on why the elements were selected. Summarize with a statement such as, âThe majority of us believe the target indicators under Access are most important with particular emphasis on collection.â or âMost groups seem to think the target indicators under Teaching and Learning are most important.
(Note to Presenter: Keep the flipcharts/wall/chalk board results. There will be an ENDING ACTIVITY that will build on this OPENING ACTIVITY. At the end of the workshop, participants will go back to the same groups. You will be asking if anyone wants to change his or her vote and why. More instructions are under the last slide.)
Presenter:
Everyone in Pennsylvania is aware of the impact of PSSA scores.
The move to greater accountability has placed a new emphasis on assessment and evaluation based on educational research.
Studies and research are important because all federal grant programs are requiring research based justifications for use of funds.
Presenter: These findings are from the Keith Curry Lance Colorado study.
Read slide.
Lance did a number of other studies as well in Alaska, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Oregon, New Mexico, Iowa and Michigan. In addition, Esther G. Smith, EGS Research and Consulting, conducted a study in Texas: âTexas School Libraries: Standards, Resources, Services, And Studentsâ Performance.â All these studies have similar findings.
Of course we all know about Pennsylvaniaâs study, âMeasuring Up to Standards,â by Keith Curry Lance. The Pennsylvania study showed that full time librarians with aides made a difference.
Please note, however, research shows that a full time school librarian isnât enough. The school librarian must be collaborating with teachers. The presence of an aide enables the school librarian to collaborate with teachers.
Presenter:
The studies have shown a number of other attributes also contribute to quality school library programs.
[Read the bullets.]
Presenter:
[Show first bullet.] In this workshop, weâll investigate ways to collect baseline data about your program.
[Show second bullet.] For example, emergent literacy programming in schools are requiring classroom collections. Rather than fighting classroom collections, librarians should provide leadership in selecting, developing and circulating quality classroom collections.
[Show third bullet.] When opportunities for better support present themselves, itâs better to have the data than to have to collect it on the spot. For example, when grant opportunities arise, you can use the evaluative data to serve as your needs assessment in the grant application.
Remember, you may be building a case for better support that doesnât involve funding proposals. You may need administrative support to change a school practice. For example, to extend school library hours after school, you may need administrative support to relieve the school librarian of bus duty. Another example would be needing administrative support to increase collaboration with teachers to bring reluctant teachers into the collaborative planning.
Presenter: Nancy Everhart is the author of the book âEvaluating the School Library Media Center.â Sheâs a professor at St. Johnâs University, NY and was previously a school librarian in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania. Her point is that an evaluation provides the data you need to determine success in all these areas.
Read the bullets.
Presenter: The remainder of the workshop will focus on three examples of evaluation on components identified as critical by the research.
This is a good time to take questions concerning the background information on the topic of evaluation.
[Show the bulleted words one by one. As you do, read the following DEFINITIONS.]
Formal: Typically this kind of evaluation would be highly structured; the data collection instruments would be carefully vetted; the result would be a detailed, public report including recommendations. Formal evaluations are more likely to be summative but they often include both quantitative and qualitative data. Formal evaluations are more likely to be evaluations of the entire program.
Informal: Typically an informal evaluation is less structured. The data collection instruments will provide useful information, but may not be so carefully vetted and therefore may have a lower level of accuracy than a research study or a formal evaluation. Informal evaluations are more likely to be formative, although they also use both quantitative and qualitative data.
External: An evaluation that includes feedback and assessment from individuals external to the school district. An outside consultant might be involved. If an advisory committee is involved, it will include members external to the administration, teaching staff and librarians of the school district.
Internal: An evaluation that solicits data from sources within the school such as administrators, teaching staff and librarians of the school or district. If an advisory committee is involved, it will include only members of the faculty or staff of the school.
Summative: An evaluation designed to document the current status. This evaluation would âsum upâ the current state of the library.
Formative: An evaluation designed to determine the current status for the purpose of planning improvement. This workshop emphasizes formative evaluation because we advocate continuous improvement.
Â
[First, Read definitions below before clicking to start the list.]
Presenter:
Quantitative: Numerical data, such as circulation statistics, collection and equipment counts, number of classes using the school library media center, number of lessons planned with teachers, etc.
Qualitative: Data that involves perceptions, opinions or judgments, such as could be collected through surveying or interviewing users about satisfaction with the services, collections and facilities of the school library media center.
[Go through the slide bullet by bullet. First show the quantitative measure and ask the participants what a corresponding qualitative measure would be. Then show the bullet for the qualitative measure on the slide. Continue down the list.]
[The following chart, from Nancy Everhartâs book Evaluating the School Library Media Center, provides more examples, if needed, to illustrate the point:]
Quantitative MeasureQualitative Measure
Circulation of fiction booksStudentsâ success rate in finding a desired fiction book
# of periodical titles% of libraryâs titles cited in student research papers
Library attendanceStudentsâ satisfaction with library hours
Presenter: Here is the evaluation model. [Read the bullets as they appear on the screen, one by one.]
Presenter: The first step in our model is to define the question. In this example, we are defining the question based on the research finding.
Presenter: The next step in the evaluation model is to collect data. Our choice in this example is going to be a questionnaire based on the Teaching and Learning rubric.
Presenter: The third step in our evaluation model is to analyze the data. How can the data collected in the questionnaires be analyzed?
Identify areas of agreement and disagreement among the groups that responded to the questionnaire.
Use the questionnaire responses to identify areas of strength and areas that need improvement.
Use the questionnaire responses to identify where more data is needed.
The slides that follow will demonstrate how to analyze data from a questionnaire based on the rubric.
Presenter: The good news here is that the school community is in 96%* agreement that the Information Literacy Standards exist and provide a strong base for curricular integration. The bad news is that this target indicator is absolutely essential to the remaining 7 target indicators in the rubric and should be at the Exemplary level. So, even though it is an agreement area, it is also an area that warrants improvement.
[96% is the average of the scores in the proficient category.]
Presenter: Those who provide the service and those who use it are pretty much in agreement that curriculum development is functioning at a basic level while the administrative staff believes that it is functioning at a proficient level. Going back to the rubric, we find that proficient requires school policies that enable the librarian to participate in building and district meetings. These data indicate a review of school policy as well as practice is appropriate.
Presenter: Having 100% agreement in the school that collaborative planning is occurring at a proficient level is a strong statement given the research. However, the proficient rubric descriptor says some teachers collaboratively plan and teach. Therefore, even strength areas provide opportunities for continuous growth.
Presenter: For this example, letâs say the library staff consistently sponsors high interest contests to bring students into the library media center to see new acquisitions with particular emphasis on fiction, which does not have a high circulation. The staff spends time preparing the displays and planning the contests; the students respond positively. The library staffâs perception is that the programming meets the proficient criteria.
However, administrators and teachers see the programming as promotion, not motivation that is generated by special literary events.
Given the overall emphasis on reading and information literacy in evaluating the effectiveness of schools and the research on the correlation between effective school library programs and reading achievement, the responses indicate this is a weak area that warrants improvement.
The responses from the administrators and teachers also suggests librarians may want to divert some of the time spent on contests to planning author visits and working with teachers to develop reading and writing assignments based on the authorâs work.
Presenter:
The good news is that the total school community believes that the library staff models and promotes effective teaching. The interesting news is that the descriptor for exemplary performance specifies authentic assessment.
The bad news is that the total school community, including the library staff, believes the librarians do not assess student work. Obviously, more data are needed to determine what improvement is needed.
Presenter: After Step 3, analyzing the data, it may become necessary to return to Step 2 and collect more data. To help resolve any contradictory data collected from questionnaires, collect more data by convening a focus groups of teachers.
Tape record the sessions and analyze the tape for themes. Ask:
How are student products and performances assessed in units that involve use of the library media center and resources?
Look for:Use of rubrics; involvement of library staff in assessment; use of panels (peer, adult, specialist).
How do you determine the products and performances students will complete to demonstrate mastery of content in units that involve use of the library media center and resources?
Look for: Library staff involvement in determining; affirmation of authentic assessments.
What is the role of reflection in student work that involves the use of the library media center and its resources?
Look for: Affirmation of role in all instruction; focus on evaluation of search strategy used in library-media based units.
[If time permits, these questions can be posed to the group and elicit responses for what you look for in the focus groupâs discussion.]
When analyzing the responses to the questions, determine whether or not authentic assessment and reflection are used consistently in teaching. If yes, determine whether that use does or does not carry over into the library media based units. The data may suggest a school-wide need for improvement that includes the library media program rather than one specifically focused on the library media program.
Presenter: We are now moving to Step 4 of the evaluation model. When the data has been collected and analyzed, it may be time to involve an advisory committee.
An advisory committee is made up of stakeholders. In the case of this example, which is using the Teaching and Learning Rubric, the stakeholders are internalâteachers, administrators, and library staff. Itâs the technical nature of this rubric that keeps the stakeholder group more limited than it would normally be.
The advisory committee can help the librarian review the data analysis and formulate recommendations. For example, they can review the research data, the responses to the rubric questionnaire and the analysis of the focus groups. They see from the research that there is a strong correlation between the school librarianâs instructional role and student achievement. They see from the responses to the rubric-based questionnaire on the school librarianâs instructional role, that their school is only at a basic or proficient level. They gain further understanding from the focus group analysis.
The advisory committee decides to set a goal that over the next three years the school will reach the exemplary level in all target indicators in the Teaching and Learning Rubric.
Presenter: Here is an example of recommendations that the advisory committee might make for the first year, based on the research, the data collected in the rubric-based questionnaire and the data collected in the focus groups.
More examples of recommendations.
More examples of recommendations.
Presenter: We are now at the last step in the evaluation process.
When developing an action plan, it is important to get investment by the stakeholders because many of the changes that need to occur go beyond the school library and affect the whole school. For example, the common planning time issue will affect teacher prep periods to some extent. Any modifications to teacher prep periods requires effective administrative leadership.
[There is a handout of this slide for participants to use. Go over the components of an action plan. Note: Participants will also get a blank action plan for use later when they complete one.]
Presenter:
This example of an evaluation was formal because it generated a written summary that was to be made public and that resulted in an action plan developed by an advisory committee.
It was internal because feedback was solicited from within the organization and the advisory committee was from within the organization.
It was formative because the purpose of the evaluation was to identify areas for continuous improvement.
The data used in the evaluation were both quantitative and qualitative.
The research provided quantitative data, that is, numerical data, including student scores on standardized tests, size of library collections, number and work hours of staff, library hours open, number of lessons planned with teachers, etc.
The rubric-based questionnaire and the focus group both yielded qualitative data, that is, data that involves perceptions, opinions or judgments.