This document provides an economic assessment of electricity generation costs in Europe. It calculates an 'Extended Levelised Cost of Electricity' (eLCOE) that includes externalities for various technologies. Onshore wind has the lowest eLCOE cost. The analysis finds external costs are significant for conventional generation. It performs a sensitivity analysis considering 'renewable friendly' and 'conventional friendly' scenarios. The document reviews methodology, results from existing studies, and estimates balancing costs, CO2 impacts, and electricity costs by technology in 2020. It aims to provide more complete information on external costs to help inform energy policy decisions.
This document summarizes updated capital cost estimates for various electricity generation technologies that were commissioned by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Key findings include that overnight capital costs for coal and nuclear plants are 25-37% higher than prior estimates, while natural gas costs remained similar. Solar photovoltaic costs declined 25% due to larger plant sizes and lower component costs. Onshore wind costs increased 21%, while offshore wind costs increased 50% to reflect first-of-a-kind U.S. project costs. Geothermal and biomass costs also increased versus prior estimates. These updated cost estimates will be used in EIA's modeling and analysis of technology choices in the electric power sector.
Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2015 EditionSLoW Projects
Projected Costs of Generating Electricity – 2015 Edition is the eighth report in the series on the levelised costs of generating electricity.
This report presents the results of work performed in 2014 and early 2015 to calculate the cost of generating electricity for both baseload electricity generated from fossil fuel thermal and nuclear power stations, and a range of renewable generation, includingvariable sources such as wind and solar.
It is a forward-looking study, based on the expected cost of commissioning these plants in 2020.
Methodology to estimate energy savings in buildings within ETSAP-TIAMIEA-ETSAP
This document outlines a methodology to estimate energy savings from building retrofits in ETSAP-TIAM. It discusses:
1) Buildings account for about 1/3 of global energy use and retrofitting over 50% of existing buildings by 2050 could significantly reduce demand.
2) The methodology involves developing technologies to provide heating/cooling savings based on energy demands. A literature review identified major energy uses in residential and commercial sectors.
3) Global data on retrofit costs and energy savings are gathered to calculate total savings and costs. An example analysis for China 2030 estimates a 2.5% total savings from retrofitting residential buildings.
A perspective on infrastructure and energy security in the transitionIngeteam Wind Energy
The report from consultants Artelys and Climact, backed by WWF and others, finds that the existing pan-European infrastructure can manage wide-ranging demand levels and potential supply disruptions. Adding much more gas infrastructure is not only unnecessary for security of supply, it also creates a risk of expensive stranded assets.
Economy-wide Implications of Policy and Uncertainty in the Power Sector of So...IEA-ETSAP
This document summarizes the key findings of a study that used linked energy-economy models to analyze the economy-wide implications of different power sector policies and uncertainties in South Africa. The study found that building new nuclear power was generally more expensive than renewable energy or maintaining coal, and increased electricity prices and GDP losses. Scenarios with a renewable target or lower nuclear costs had lower costs and smaller economic impacts. Imposing an early nuclear program reduced economic growth more than allowing nuclear to develop freely based on its own economics.
Energy Demand Analysis of Telecom Towers of Nepal with Strategic Scenario Dev...IJRES Journal
Telecom towers, technically known as BTS (Base Transceiver Stations) are the most energy intensive part of cellular network architecture and contribute up to 60 to 80% of total cellular power consumption and varies in response to the real traffic demand throughout the day and night. But, thelack of grid availability highlightsa potential barrier to telecom industry growth in Nepal. Nepal has approximately 5,222 telecom towers of which about 22% do operate on diesel generators (DGs) while the remaining by grid electricity with some shares of renewable energy technologies (RETs: solar and/or wind). Despite the large carbon imprint, the uncertainty in power availability has compelled telecom operators to use DGs to ensure continuous supply of power for the better network availability, which translates huge operating costs along with adverse environmental impact. So, it becomes an imperative solution for telecom operators to evaluate all alternatives in order to increase network reliability with reduced energy cost. This study report intentionally focus on current energy consumptionof such telecom towers and forecast thefuture energydemand with reference to growing subscriber trend up to 2025 using LEAP (Long Range Energy Alternative Planning System)withBusiness As Usual (BAU) scenario. A clean energy technology (CET) scenario with possible RET options is also developed and compared with base case scenario through some policy mechanics on behalf of environmental benefits and sustainable cellular communication. Furthermore, this study concludes a potential energy cum cost saving with RET adoption with basic cost economics analysis.
The document summarizes the activities of the Czech RE Agency, a non-governmental organization that supports renewable energy development in the Czech Republic. The agency is involved in projects related to research and development, promotion, education and training on renewable energy sources such as photovoltaics. It also creates maps and databases to track renewable energy installations across the country and analyzes legislation and incentives to further renewable energy adoption.
This document summarizes an analysis of electric vehicles (EVs) that addresses their environmental impact and use of critical metals. It finds that EVs have lower lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than diesel vehicles, even when powered by the most carbon-intensive electricity grids in Europe. As grids add more renewable energy, EVs' climate impact will diminish further. It also concludes that demand increases from EVs will not constrain supplies of critical metals like lithium, cobalt and rare earths in coming decades, but supply sources will need diversification and standards to ensure sustainability.
This document summarizes updated capital cost estimates for various electricity generation technologies that were commissioned by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Key findings include that overnight capital costs for coal and nuclear plants are 25-37% higher than prior estimates, while natural gas costs remained similar. Solar photovoltaic costs declined 25% due to larger plant sizes and lower component costs. Onshore wind costs increased 21%, while offshore wind costs increased 50% to reflect first-of-a-kind U.S. project costs. Geothermal and biomass costs also increased versus prior estimates. These updated cost estimates will be used in EIA's modeling and analysis of technology choices in the electric power sector.
Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2015 EditionSLoW Projects
Projected Costs of Generating Electricity – 2015 Edition is the eighth report in the series on the levelised costs of generating electricity.
This report presents the results of work performed in 2014 and early 2015 to calculate the cost of generating electricity for both baseload electricity generated from fossil fuel thermal and nuclear power stations, and a range of renewable generation, includingvariable sources such as wind and solar.
It is a forward-looking study, based on the expected cost of commissioning these plants in 2020.
Methodology to estimate energy savings in buildings within ETSAP-TIAMIEA-ETSAP
This document outlines a methodology to estimate energy savings from building retrofits in ETSAP-TIAM. It discusses:
1) Buildings account for about 1/3 of global energy use and retrofitting over 50% of existing buildings by 2050 could significantly reduce demand.
2) The methodology involves developing technologies to provide heating/cooling savings based on energy demands. A literature review identified major energy uses in residential and commercial sectors.
3) Global data on retrofit costs and energy savings are gathered to calculate total savings and costs. An example analysis for China 2030 estimates a 2.5% total savings from retrofitting residential buildings.
A perspective on infrastructure and energy security in the transitionIngeteam Wind Energy
The report from consultants Artelys and Climact, backed by WWF and others, finds that the existing pan-European infrastructure can manage wide-ranging demand levels and potential supply disruptions. Adding much more gas infrastructure is not only unnecessary for security of supply, it also creates a risk of expensive stranded assets.
Economy-wide Implications of Policy and Uncertainty in the Power Sector of So...IEA-ETSAP
This document summarizes the key findings of a study that used linked energy-economy models to analyze the economy-wide implications of different power sector policies and uncertainties in South Africa. The study found that building new nuclear power was generally more expensive than renewable energy or maintaining coal, and increased electricity prices and GDP losses. Scenarios with a renewable target or lower nuclear costs had lower costs and smaller economic impacts. Imposing an early nuclear program reduced economic growth more than allowing nuclear to develop freely based on its own economics.
Energy Demand Analysis of Telecom Towers of Nepal with Strategic Scenario Dev...IJRES Journal
Telecom towers, technically known as BTS (Base Transceiver Stations) are the most energy intensive part of cellular network architecture and contribute up to 60 to 80% of total cellular power consumption and varies in response to the real traffic demand throughout the day and night. But, thelack of grid availability highlightsa potential barrier to telecom industry growth in Nepal. Nepal has approximately 5,222 telecom towers of which about 22% do operate on diesel generators (DGs) while the remaining by grid electricity with some shares of renewable energy technologies (RETs: solar and/or wind). Despite the large carbon imprint, the uncertainty in power availability has compelled telecom operators to use DGs to ensure continuous supply of power for the better network availability, which translates huge operating costs along with adverse environmental impact. So, it becomes an imperative solution for telecom operators to evaluate all alternatives in order to increase network reliability with reduced energy cost. This study report intentionally focus on current energy consumptionof such telecom towers and forecast thefuture energydemand with reference to growing subscriber trend up to 2025 using LEAP (Long Range Energy Alternative Planning System)withBusiness As Usual (BAU) scenario. A clean energy technology (CET) scenario with possible RET options is also developed and compared with base case scenario through some policy mechanics on behalf of environmental benefits and sustainable cellular communication. Furthermore, this study concludes a potential energy cum cost saving with RET adoption with basic cost economics analysis.
The document summarizes the activities of the Czech RE Agency, a non-governmental organization that supports renewable energy development in the Czech Republic. The agency is involved in projects related to research and development, promotion, education and training on renewable energy sources such as photovoltaics. It also creates maps and databases to track renewable energy installations across the country and analyzes legislation and incentives to further renewable energy adoption.
This document summarizes an analysis of electric vehicles (EVs) that addresses their environmental impact and use of critical metals. It finds that EVs have lower lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than diesel vehicles, even when powered by the most carbon-intensive electricity grids in Europe. As grids add more renewable energy, EVs' climate impact will diminish further. It also concludes that demand increases from EVs will not constrain supplies of critical metals like lithium, cobalt and rare earths in coming decades, but supply sources will need diversification and standards to ensure sustainability.
The document discusses Germany's transition to renewable energy, known as the Energiewende. It provides a brief history of the Energiewende beginning in the 1970s in response to the oil crisis. Key policies that have accelerated the transition include the Renewable Energy Sources Act, laws phasing out nuclear power by 2022, and amendments expanding the energy grid. The document outlines Germany's goals of meeting 30% of energy needs from renewables by 2020, 50% by 2030, 65% by 2040, and 80% by 2050. It also notes the substantial increase in renewable energy capacity and falling costs of renewable technologies.
A Review on the State of the Energy Sector of Turkey from the Persective of O...SSA KPI
AACIMP 2010 Summer School lecture by Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. "Applied Mathematics" stream. "Modern Operational Research and Its Mathematical Methods with a Focus on Financial Mathematics" course. Part 9.
More info at http://summerschool.ssa.org.ua
This document summarizes a literature review on life cycle assessments (LCAs) of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles. Key findings include:
1) LCA results in literature diverge due to differences in system boundaries, electricity mixes, and testing protocols.
2) Well-to-wheel studies show electric vehicles perform better in urban areas with frequent stops. Their emissions depend highly on electricity sources and charging profiles.
3) Including vehicle production increases impacts for electric vehicles mostly due to battery production, though operational impacts dominate over the vehicle's lifetime.
Alam Mondal, Alebachew Azezew Belete, Hua Xie, Dawit Mekonnen
WEBINAR
Capacity Building on Modeling the Ethiopian Energy System: Final Workshop
SEP 30, 2020 - 02:00 PM TO 04:00 PM EAT
In 2011, the European Commission concluded in its white paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area” that the phase-out of fossil fuels driven cars by 2050 was necessary to achieve its energy and climate objectives. In 2019, as part of the European Green Deal, the Commission is proposing to revise the regulation on CO2 standards for cars and vans, to ensure a clear pathway towards zero-emission mobility.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to road transport have grown since 1990 by 20.5%, and now account for one-fifth of EU GHG emissions – and they keep growing. The picture is similar regarding final energy consumption. Road transport uses 24% of EU final energy, having grown by 28% since 1990.
The good news is that a zero-emission technology is ready today for market uptake: the battery electric vehicle. From day one this vehicle completely cuts local GHG and air pollutant emissions and emits three times less GHG emissions on a well-to-wheel basis. On a life cycle basis (“cradle to grave”), a battery electric vehicle also generates significantly less GHG emissions than cars using gasoline or diesel. Moreover, the full decarbonisation of the electricity system, which is foreseen well before 2050, will enable battery electric vehicles to make transport fully climate-neutral.
Electrifying road transport is also the fastest and most cost-effective way to achieve energy efficiency goals because it is the asset with the highest replacing rate (average car ownership period 5-7 years1)and is currently at least 2.5 times more efficient than alternative technologies.
On 28 November 2019 the European Parliament declared a climate emergency and its Members asked for immediate and ambitious action to limit the effects of climate change2. Battery electric vehicles are ready to contribute to addressing this challenge. What is needed now is to accelerate the deployment of full electric vehicles.
Copper is one of the main materials that makes this transition possible. On average a battery electric vehicle requires three times more copper than a vehicle driven by a combustion engine. Half of it is in the battery system, mainly as foil in the anode of the cell working as current collector and heat dissipator. About one quarter is in the drive motors and their control system, and the other quarter is in wire harness, connectors and electronics. In addition, copper plays a role in the charging infrastructure and in the generation of renewable electricity to power the vehicles.
Optimal Economic Load Dispatch of the Nigerian Thermal Power Stations Using P...theijes
This document summarizes the application of particle swarm optimization (PSO) to solve the economic load dispatch (ELD) problem for Nigeria's thermal power stations. PSO is used to determine the optimal allocation of total power demand among generating units to minimize total fuel costs while satisfying constraints. The PSO algorithm is applied to a 1999 model of Nigeria's power network and results are compared to other heuristic methods. PSO efficiently distributes load to minimize costs and overcomes limitations of traditional optimization techniques for non-linear power system problems.
Lithuania has significant technical potential for renewable energy, especially biomass and wind. Renewable energy projects under 10kW receive feed-in tariffs for 12 years, while larger projects must participate in quarterly tenders. The feed-in tariff led to rapid growth of wind power capacity. Lithuania aims to source 25% of final energy from renewables by 2020 through various support policies and incentive schemes.
Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers - Part 1Leonardo ENERGY
Primary energy factors (PEF), often referred to as conversion factors, are required to calculate the total energy consumption including the total chain of energy generation based on the final energy consumption data.
In this webinar, different primary energy definitions, accounting methods, and their applications with a focus on electricity and heat generation from renewable energy will be presented. In addition to renewable energy sources, primary energy factors for electricity from waste, nuclear, and imported electricity are also discussed as these can be calculated in different ways. Depending on the methodology used, it will be shown that the resulting PEFs for different energy sources vary significantly.
EWEA's report shows that in 2010, wind energy avoided as much as 28% of the EU’s Kyoto emissions reduction target, and will avoid as much as 31% of the EU-wide objective by 2020. Contents: EWEA climate policy recommendations for the EU to 2020 include moving to a 30% domestic reduction target, tightening the emissions trading system to avoid oversupply and a low CO2 price and committing 100% of ETS auctioning revenue to finance climate mitigation.
Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers - Part IILeonardo ENERGY
This document summarizes a webinar presentation on primary energy demand of renewable energy carriers - part II. It discusses various definitions and accounting principles for primary energy factors. It reviews how primary energy factors are addressed in the Energy Efficiency Directive, Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, and Renewable Energy Directive. It also examines the policy implications of using different primary energy factor definitions, noting they can impact assessments of energy source reductions and priorities. The presentation cautions that a sole focus on reducing primary energy use could lead to conclusions that contradict climate goals of minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.
The document presents budget allocation charts for energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in Morocco. It summarizes the country's energy situation, key technologies for efficiency and renewables, and the methodology used to create budget allocation charts. The charts show the additional energy savings and costs of various technologies, helping policymakers identify the most effective options to maximize energy savings or minimize costs. Specifically, the charts indicate technologies with the highest savings and most cost-effective options to guide policy decisions.
The Czech Republic saw significant growth in solar PV installations in 2009-2010 due to feed-in tariffs, but reduced the tariffs in 2011 which slowed growth. While wind and solar capacity grew in 2012, the government capped tariffs and premiums at a maximum of €174/MWh. The Czech Republic aims to source 14% of energy from renewables by 2020 according to its National Renewable Energy Action Plan.
The document discusses wind energy development in Ethiopia. It notes that Ethiopia will need to add around 33 GW of electricity over the next 20 years to support economic growth. Wind energy could help meet this need and set an example for private sector energy projects. The Aysha wind farm is presented as a case study, describing its 120 MW planned capacity and progress toward development. Financing structures will be key to increasing capacity and driving economic growth in Ethiopia.
This document provides an alternative projection of world energy consumption compared to projections from the 2010 International Energy Outlook. The authors project energy consumption based on historical trends identified by an experience model. They compare their projections for 8 countries against those from the 2010 International Energy Outlook and find that the Outlook projections are lower for China, the US, India, Japan, and Mexico, indicating assumptions not supported by historical data. The authors aim to provide a benchmark projection to evaluate other forecasts of energy consumption.
Med enec building ee indicators f visser121129RCREEE
This document discusses key building energy indicators for Lebanon that were developed as part of a European Union-funded project. It identifies relevant indicators for evaluating energy efficiency programs and developing building energy codes, including overall and specific energy consumption for various building sectors and end uses. The indicators will help establish data collection methods and benchmarks to assess Lebanon's building stock energy performance.
14 undp turkey ee presentation katalin_zaim 09 dec 2013UNDPhr
This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Katalin Zaim at a Power Summit in Turkey in 2013. The presentation outlines Turkey's renewable energy and energy efficiency targets for 2023, including increasing renewable energy generation to 30% and specific targets for wind, hydro, and solar power. It also summarizes several UNDP Turkey energy efficiency projects focused on industry, buildings, and appliances that aim to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Key activities and achievements of the projects are highlighted.
Ukraine has excellent technical renewable energy potential supported by feed-in tariffs and policies. The feed-in tariff payments are guaranteed until 2030 to ensure long-term investment security, and the tariff is adjusted monthly for inflation. Recent improvements to permitting and licensing have increased Ukraine's rank in indicators of ease of doing business.
This interim report summarizes subsidies and costs of EU energy in 2012. It finds that total public interventions in EU energy markets were €122 billion in 2012, with renewable energy sources receiving the highest support of €41 billion. The estimated external costs of environmental impacts from energy production and use were €200 billion. Wholesale costs of energy across the EU were approximately €500 billion for context. The report provides breakdowns of subsidies by technology and EU country.
Second Ukrainian NDC to the Paris Agreement: Modelling Approach and ResultsIEA-ETSAP
This document summarizes the results of modeling Ukraine's second nationally determined contribution (NDC) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement. Four scenarios were modeled - business as usual, reference, climate neutral, and combined sensitivity. The modeling found that the reference and combined sensitivity scenarios could reduce emissions 25-28% below 1990 levels by 2030, meeting Ukraine's NDC pledge. The climate neutral scenario nearly achieves net-zero emissions by 2070 in line with the Paris Agreement goals. Significant investment is required but could boost economic growth and lead to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy.
Webinar - Primary energy factors for electricity in buildingsLeonardo ENERGY
There is no unified approach in European regulation of how to calculate primary energy when assessing energy performance of buildings. Instead, member states can decide on their own method of calculation of primary energy. As the share of renewables will progress towards 2050, the primary energy factors for electricity in Europe will also be subject to changes over time.
Related to the energy performance of buildings, the question is in what way different (due to national electricity mix or methodology) and changing (due to increased share of renewable electricity) primary energy factors for electricity influence decisions on a political level and on a level of individual building designs, especially with regard to space heating options (gas vs. electricity). From a point of view of making the electricity supply more flexible, it could be desirable to increase the share of electricity for heating. The objective of this work was to assess to what extent this is stimulated (or hampered) by changing primary energy factors in building regulation of a number of countries.
Introductory comments on primary energy factors and the EPBD
Primary energy factors of seven countries in the EU: • France • Germany • The Netherlands • Poland • Spain • Sweden • UK
Primary energy factors estimated evolution at 2020 and 2050 horizons, using the same calculation methods for all countries, based on the energy sources that can be expected to be in the national mix of these countries in 2020 and 2050, according to different scenario’s.
Implications of changing primary energy factors for technologies used in the building sector and recommendations on how to deal with primary energy factors in the EPBD in the short term and the longer term.
This document discusses biomass as a source of electricity in the European Union. It notes that biomass currently accounts for 7.4% of electricity production on average across EU members. The document addresses some challenges with biomass electricity including its relatively low energy density compared to other renewable sources as well as potential competition with food production and biodiversity for land use. It calls for sustainability criteria to guide the industry's growth and challenges relying on potentially inefficient biomass technologies.
The document discusses a study by the European Environment Agency (EEA) on the environmental potential for hydroelectric power in Europe. The study analyzed data from the EEA's ECRINS database to determine the technical and environmental potential for hydro, with environmental potential defined as using 0.33 of mean river flow at a capacity factor of 70%. The data was incomplete but improving, and the EEA may revisit their analysis next year with better proxy information to refine their estimates.
The document discusses Germany's transition to renewable energy, known as the Energiewende. It provides a brief history of the Energiewende beginning in the 1970s in response to the oil crisis. Key policies that have accelerated the transition include the Renewable Energy Sources Act, laws phasing out nuclear power by 2022, and amendments expanding the energy grid. The document outlines Germany's goals of meeting 30% of energy needs from renewables by 2020, 50% by 2030, 65% by 2040, and 80% by 2050. It also notes the substantial increase in renewable energy capacity and falling costs of renewable technologies.
A Review on the State of the Energy Sector of Turkey from the Persective of O...SSA KPI
AACIMP 2010 Summer School lecture by Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. "Applied Mathematics" stream. "Modern Operational Research and Its Mathematical Methods with a Focus on Financial Mathematics" course. Part 9.
More info at http://summerschool.ssa.org.ua
This document summarizes a literature review on life cycle assessments (LCAs) of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles. Key findings include:
1) LCA results in literature diverge due to differences in system boundaries, electricity mixes, and testing protocols.
2) Well-to-wheel studies show electric vehicles perform better in urban areas with frequent stops. Their emissions depend highly on electricity sources and charging profiles.
3) Including vehicle production increases impacts for electric vehicles mostly due to battery production, though operational impacts dominate over the vehicle's lifetime.
Alam Mondal, Alebachew Azezew Belete, Hua Xie, Dawit Mekonnen
WEBINAR
Capacity Building on Modeling the Ethiopian Energy System: Final Workshop
SEP 30, 2020 - 02:00 PM TO 04:00 PM EAT
In 2011, the European Commission concluded in its white paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area” that the phase-out of fossil fuels driven cars by 2050 was necessary to achieve its energy and climate objectives. In 2019, as part of the European Green Deal, the Commission is proposing to revise the regulation on CO2 standards for cars and vans, to ensure a clear pathway towards zero-emission mobility.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to road transport have grown since 1990 by 20.5%, and now account for one-fifth of EU GHG emissions – and they keep growing. The picture is similar regarding final energy consumption. Road transport uses 24% of EU final energy, having grown by 28% since 1990.
The good news is that a zero-emission technology is ready today for market uptake: the battery electric vehicle. From day one this vehicle completely cuts local GHG and air pollutant emissions and emits three times less GHG emissions on a well-to-wheel basis. On a life cycle basis (“cradle to grave”), a battery electric vehicle also generates significantly less GHG emissions than cars using gasoline or diesel. Moreover, the full decarbonisation of the electricity system, which is foreseen well before 2050, will enable battery electric vehicles to make transport fully climate-neutral.
Electrifying road transport is also the fastest and most cost-effective way to achieve energy efficiency goals because it is the asset with the highest replacing rate (average car ownership period 5-7 years1)and is currently at least 2.5 times more efficient than alternative technologies.
On 28 November 2019 the European Parliament declared a climate emergency and its Members asked for immediate and ambitious action to limit the effects of climate change2. Battery electric vehicles are ready to contribute to addressing this challenge. What is needed now is to accelerate the deployment of full electric vehicles.
Copper is one of the main materials that makes this transition possible. On average a battery electric vehicle requires three times more copper than a vehicle driven by a combustion engine. Half of it is in the battery system, mainly as foil in the anode of the cell working as current collector and heat dissipator. About one quarter is in the drive motors and their control system, and the other quarter is in wire harness, connectors and electronics. In addition, copper plays a role in the charging infrastructure and in the generation of renewable electricity to power the vehicles.
Optimal Economic Load Dispatch of the Nigerian Thermal Power Stations Using P...theijes
This document summarizes the application of particle swarm optimization (PSO) to solve the economic load dispatch (ELD) problem for Nigeria's thermal power stations. PSO is used to determine the optimal allocation of total power demand among generating units to minimize total fuel costs while satisfying constraints. The PSO algorithm is applied to a 1999 model of Nigeria's power network and results are compared to other heuristic methods. PSO efficiently distributes load to minimize costs and overcomes limitations of traditional optimization techniques for non-linear power system problems.
Lithuania has significant technical potential for renewable energy, especially biomass and wind. Renewable energy projects under 10kW receive feed-in tariffs for 12 years, while larger projects must participate in quarterly tenders. The feed-in tariff led to rapid growth of wind power capacity. Lithuania aims to source 25% of final energy from renewables by 2020 through various support policies and incentive schemes.
Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers - Part 1Leonardo ENERGY
Primary energy factors (PEF), often referred to as conversion factors, are required to calculate the total energy consumption including the total chain of energy generation based on the final energy consumption data.
In this webinar, different primary energy definitions, accounting methods, and their applications with a focus on electricity and heat generation from renewable energy will be presented. In addition to renewable energy sources, primary energy factors for electricity from waste, nuclear, and imported electricity are also discussed as these can be calculated in different ways. Depending on the methodology used, it will be shown that the resulting PEFs for different energy sources vary significantly.
EWEA's report shows that in 2010, wind energy avoided as much as 28% of the EU’s Kyoto emissions reduction target, and will avoid as much as 31% of the EU-wide objective by 2020. Contents: EWEA climate policy recommendations for the EU to 2020 include moving to a 30% domestic reduction target, tightening the emissions trading system to avoid oversupply and a low CO2 price and committing 100% of ETS auctioning revenue to finance climate mitigation.
Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers - Part IILeonardo ENERGY
This document summarizes a webinar presentation on primary energy demand of renewable energy carriers - part II. It discusses various definitions and accounting principles for primary energy factors. It reviews how primary energy factors are addressed in the Energy Efficiency Directive, Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, and Renewable Energy Directive. It also examines the policy implications of using different primary energy factor definitions, noting they can impact assessments of energy source reductions and priorities. The presentation cautions that a sole focus on reducing primary energy use could lead to conclusions that contradict climate goals of minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.
The document presents budget allocation charts for energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in Morocco. It summarizes the country's energy situation, key technologies for efficiency and renewables, and the methodology used to create budget allocation charts. The charts show the additional energy savings and costs of various technologies, helping policymakers identify the most effective options to maximize energy savings or minimize costs. Specifically, the charts indicate technologies with the highest savings and most cost-effective options to guide policy decisions.
The Czech Republic saw significant growth in solar PV installations in 2009-2010 due to feed-in tariffs, but reduced the tariffs in 2011 which slowed growth. While wind and solar capacity grew in 2012, the government capped tariffs and premiums at a maximum of €174/MWh. The Czech Republic aims to source 14% of energy from renewables by 2020 according to its National Renewable Energy Action Plan.
The document discusses wind energy development in Ethiopia. It notes that Ethiopia will need to add around 33 GW of electricity over the next 20 years to support economic growth. Wind energy could help meet this need and set an example for private sector energy projects. The Aysha wind farm is presented as a case study, describing its 120 MW planned capacity and progress toward development. Financing structures will be key to increasing capacity and driving economic growth in Ethiopia.
This document provides an alternative projection of world energy consumption compared to projections from the 2010 International Energy Outlook. The authors project energy consumption based on historical trends identified by an experience model. They compare their projections for 8 countries against those from the 2010 International Energy Outlook and find that the Outlook projections are lower for China, the US, India, Japan, and Mexico, indicating assumptions not supported by historical data. The authors aim to provide a benchmark projection to evaluate other forecasts of energy consumption.
Med enec building ee indicators f visser121129RCREEE
This document discusses key building energy indicators for Lebanon that were developed as part of a European Union-funded project. It identifies relevant indicators for evaluating energy efficiency programs and developing building energy codes, including overall and specific energy consumption for various building sectors and end uses. The indicators will help establish data collection methods and benchmarks to assess Lebanon's building stock energy performance.
14 undp turkey ee presentation katalin_zaim 09 dec 2013UNDPhr
This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Katalin Zaim at a Power Summit in Turkey in 2013. The presentation outlines Turkey's renewable energy and energy efficiency targets for 2023, including increasing renewable energy generation to 30% and specific targets for wind, hydro, and solar power. It also summarizes several UNDP Turkey energy efficiency projects focused on industry, buildings, and appliances that aim to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Key activities and achievements of the projects are highlighted.
Ukraine has excellent technical renewable energy potential supported by feed-in tariffs and policies. The feed-in tariff payments are guaranteed until 2030 to ensure long-term investment security, and the tariff is adjusted monthly for inflation. Recent improvements to permitting and licensing have increased Ukraine's rank in indicators of ease of doing business.
This interim report summarizes subsidies and costs of EU energy in 2012. It finds that total public interventions in EU energy markets were €122 billion in 2012, with renewable energy sources receiving the highest support of €41 billion. The estimated external costs of environmental impacts from energy production and use were €200 billion. Wholesale costs of energy across the EU were approximately €500 billion for context. The report provides breakdowns of subsidies by technology and EU country.
Second Ukrainian NDC to the Paris Agreement: Modelling Approach and ResultsIEA-ETSAP
This document summarizes the results of modeling Ukraine's second nationally determined contribution (NDC) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement. Four scenarios were modeled - business as usual, reference, climate neutral, and combined sensitivity. The modeling found that the reference and combined sensitivity scenarios could reduce emissions 25-28% below 1990 levels by 2030, meeting Ukraine's NDC pledge. The climate neutral scenario nearly achieves net-zero emissions by 2070 in line with the Paris Agreement goals. Significant investment is required but could boost economic growth and lead to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy.
Webinar - Primary energy factors for electricity in buildingsLeonardo ENERGY
There is no unified approach in European regulation of how to calculate primary energy when assessing energy performance of buildings. Instead, member states can decide on their own method of calculation of primary energy. As the share of renewables will progress towards 2050, the primary energy factors for electricity in Europe will also be subject to changes over time.
Related to the energy performance of buildings, the question is in what way different (due to national electricity mix or methodology) and changing (due to increased share of renewable electricity) primary energy factors for electricity influence decisions on a political level and on a level of individual building designs, especially with regard to space heating options (gas vs. electricity). From a point of view of making the electricity supply more flexible, it could be desirable to increase the share of electricity for heating. The objective of this work was to assess to what extent this is stimulated (or hampered) by changing primary energy factors in building regulation of a number of countries.
Introductory comments on primary energy factors and the EPBD
Primary energy factors of seven countries in the EU: • France • Germany • The Netherlands • Poland • Spain • Sweden • UK
Primary energy factors estimated evolution at 2020 and 2050 horizons, using the same calculation methods for all countries, based on the energy sources that can be expected to be in the national mix of these countries in 2020 and 2050, according to different scenario’s.
Implications of changing primary energy factors for technologies used in the building sector and recommendations on how to deal with primary energy factors in the EPBD in the short term and the longer term.
This document discusses biomass as a source of electricity in the European Union. It notes that biomass currently accounts for 7.4% of electricity production on average across EU members. The document addresses some challenges with biomass electricity including its relatively low energy density compared to other renewable sources as well as potential competition with food production and biodiversity for land use. It calls for sustainability criteria to guide the industry's growth and challenges relying on potentially inefficient biomass technologies.
The document discusses a study by the European Environment Agency (EEA) on the environmental potential for hydroelectric power in Europe. The study analyzed data from the EEA's ECRINS database to determine the technical and environmental potential for hydro, with environmental potential defined as using 0.33 of mean river flow at a capacity factor of 70%. The data was incomplete but improving, and the EEA may revisit their analysis next year with better proxy information to refine their estimates.
This document outlines a plan to record a live DVD performance by Dweezil Zappa playing his father Frank Zappa's music at the House of Blues in San Diego. The venue seats 1,000 people and has audio/video production capabilities. The schedule details the band and crew's arrival, soundcheck, performance, and load out. Revenue is projected at $50,000 from ticket sales, $7,500 from merch, and $5,000 from concessions. Costs include $20,000 for the band and $20,000 for venue/production. The projected profit is $45,000. Risks discussed are higher than expected production costs and a subpar performance, though the likelihood is low given
This document discusses wind energy and its role in Wales' renewable energy goals. It notes that while energy use in Wales has decreased, consumption continues to increase overall. Currently, renewable generation in Wales comes primarily from wind, hydro, and bioenergy, but the share of UK renewable generation from Wales has fallen in recent years. Barriers such as inconsistent planning policies have hindered growth of renewables in Wales. The document argues that wind energy can help meet Wales' future energy needs through benefits like jobs and community funds, but current policies do not adequately support increasing renewable capacity from sources like wind.
Jan 2011 - How does the UK NREAP stack up to other European countries?David Owain Clubb
The UK has set renewable energy targets to source 21% of its energy from renewables by 2010, 33% by 2015, and 30% by 2020. While the UK has ambitious goals for wind capacity growth and marine renewable development, it lags behind several other European countries in current renewable energy usage per capita, and will need to emphasize the development of solar, heat pumps, and transport alternatives to meet its future targets.
This document discusses the growth of offshore wind infrastructure in coastal zones and the interactions between wind infrastructure and other ocean uses like shipping and pipelines. It references several reports on topics like the spatial planning of offshore wind farms, European oil infrastructure and shipping routes, and projections that forecast a large increase in offshore wind and shipping of oil/gas as domestic fossil fuel production declines. Contact information is provided for further discussion.
This document discusses environmental impacts from offshore wind farms, including impacts during construction, operation, and decommissioning. It notes that construction can impact marine animals through noise from pile driving but that operational impacts appear minimal. Operational impacts on birds may be less than 1% collision risk, and wind farms may create artificial reefs and fish refuges. Planning and environmental directives aim to ensure cumulative impacts are considered and good environmental status of oceans is maintained.
This document summarizes a study that uses life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts and resource requirements of different low greenhouse gas electricity generation technologies on a global scale. The study models scenarios where these technologies are implemented to levels expected by 2030 and 2050 based on International Energy Agency forecasts. It finds that most renewable energy technologies provide substantial emissions reductions compared to fossil fuels. Additionally, manufacturing renewable energy technologies requires additional materials ranging from 0.1 to 3 times annual global production in 2010, with concentrating solar and wind having the highest demand for materials like steel and cement. Renewable technologies also generally have higher land use requirements than fossil fuels due to their lower energy density.
This document analyzes the technical and economic feasibility of using off-grid solar photovoltaic technology to generate electricity in Peshawar, Pakistan. It finds that while solar PV electricity is currently more expensive than grid electricity, subsidies from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government could help promote solar adoption. The document estimates solar energy production potential in Peshawar and calculates the electricity costs and payback periods for a 10kW residential solar system under different capital cost scenarios. It also analyzes the system's net present value, internal rate of return, investment payback period, and energy payback time. The document concludes that while upfront costs are high, solar PV could ensure cleaner energy and reduce greenhouse
This document discusses wind power technologies and costs. It provides three key findings:
1. Installed costs for onshore wind farms in 2010 ranged from $1,300-$1,400/kW in China and Denmark to $1,800-$2,200/kW in most other major markets. Offshore wind farms cost $4,000-$4,500/kW.
2. Operations and maintenance costs account for 11-30% of the levelized cost of electricity for onshore wind, averaging $0.01-$0.025/kWh. Offshore O&M costs are higher at $0.027-$0.048/kWh.
3. The
How costs affect deployment of low carbon technologies - analysis with JRC-EU...IEA-ETSAP
The document discusses using the JRC-EU-TIMES energy system optimization model to analyze the impacts of technology costs and assumptions on the deployment of low carbon technologies in Europe. The model can explore scenarios assessing different technology sensitivities to provide insights for targeting research and innovation efforts. Examples analyzed include the impacts of solar PV costs and the role of geothermal with and without carbon capture and storage. The model results can indicate potentially cost-effective research and innovation investment levels to achieve breakthrough technology performance levels.
The Scope for Electricity & Carbon Saving in the EU through the use of EPM Te...Leonardo ENERGY
Highlights:
* Discusses the features and advantages of electromagnetic processing of materials (EPM).
* EPM provides significant opportunities to save energy and reduce carbon emissions in industrial thermal processes.
* Describes a scenario in which industrial processes are gradually switched to 100% electrical operation.
* Suggests that the most energy intensive industrial thermal processes could be replaced by electrothermal technologies.
This application note provides an overview of the most relevant characteristics and considerations regarding commercial and tertiary sector photovoltaic (PV) power plants (100 kW to 2 MW). It is aimed at potential investors, including industrial and tertiary sector companies, communities and financial institutions, among other parties.
Over the past decade, the competitiveness of PV as opposed to other electricity sources has improved considerably, mainly driven by new technological improvements and cost reductions per unit of installed power. In many situations, PV systems represent a profitable and relatively low risk investment opportunity. Nevertheless, a case-by-case analysis should be performed to properly evaluate each project.
The principal technological choices to be made during a PV plant development project concern the actual PV panels, the mounting structures, the inverter, and the storage system. Relatively few major types of systems are currently available on the market for each of these components. This application note describes their main advantages and disadvantages. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the difficulties and risks that can be encountered during the PV plant development process.
The business model of the project will be determined by the local system of government incentives. This application note depicts key issues related to financing and the economics of a PV investment. It describes the choice between a corporate loan and a leasing formula and the calculation of the Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Finally, it executes a sensitivity analysis on the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of the PV plant. The cost of the EPC contractor and the local irradiation level turn out to be major parameters influencing the result. The discount rate and the lifetime of the PV plants influence the LCOE to a lesser extent. Note that the LCOE needs to be compared with retail electricity prices for residential PV projects, with commercial electricity rates before VAT for company PV projects, and with the cost of other electricity generation sources (e.g. a gas fired combined cycle plant) for electrical utility PV projects.
The document summarizes the costs of different energy technologies. It finds that while upfront capital costs are lower for fossil fuels, accounting for additional costs like carbon capture, public health impacts, and climate change effects makes fossil fuels more expensive than renewable sources over the lifetime of the projects. Renewable costs are expected to continue declining due to technological learning and economies of scale, while fossil fuel and nuclear costs are subject to greater uncertainty and overruns. The document concludes that hidden costs are much lower for wind and solar power compared to traditional sources like coal and gas.
The Economics and Finance of Offshore WindEamon Keane
The document summarizes the economics and financing challenges of offshore wind power in Europe. It finds that offshore wind is significantly more expensive than both onshore wind and natural gas currently. Offshore wind projects also face difficulties obtaining financing from private investors due to low expected returns. Government subsidies have been critical in supporting development of offshore wind so far, but these subsidies may not be sustainable long term. A consistent price on carbon, such as a carbon tax, would help make offshore wind economically viable compared to fossil fuel alternatives.
Webinar: The cost effectiveness of natural gas combined cycle power plants wi...Global CCS Institute
This second webinar was held on Friday 25th April, for anyone who wasn't able to join us for the previous webinar held on Thursday 20th March.
This webinar presented the findings of a study to assess the economic viability of natural gas combined-cycle power plants with CO2 capture and storage (NGCC-CCS) in climate change mitigation strategies, emphasising the use of renewable energy and natural gas for electric power generation. In this study, the cost of NGCC-CCS was compared on a level playing field to those of intermittent renewable energy systems (IRES) and energy storage technologies as a means of reducing power sector greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) of NGCC-CCS was compared to that of offshore wind, photovoltaic systems, and concentrated solar power (CSP) together with pumped hydro storage (PHS), compressed air energy storage (CAES), and Li-ion, ZEBRA and Zn-Br battery storage systems. The cost of NGCC-CCS as a backup technology in conjunction with IRES also was assessed.
At this webinar, Machteld van den Broek, senior researcher at the Utrecht University, presented the findings of the study. Her expertise is energy systems modelling and CCS. Among others, she is involved in the CATO-2 programme, the second Dutch national research programme on CCS. During the webinar Professor Edward Rubin from Carnegie Mellon University and co-author of this study, will assist during the Q&A session. Niels Berghout, from Utrecht University also contributed to this study.
As society struggles to find clean, affordable, and reliable energy alternatives to meet the energy challenge and mitigate global climate change, it is important that scientists and policy-makers around the world work together to explore solutions.
To present the Swiss perspective on sustainable energy alternatives for the future, professor Konstantinos Boulouchos of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ) will share the complex interaction between the energy and climate change challenges and provide insight into the ongoing debate surrounding long-term strategic targets like the 2,000-watt versus the one-ton CO2 society.
TOO4TO Module 4 / Sustainable Energy Solutions: Part 2TOO4TO
This presentation is part of the Sustainable Management: Tools for Tomorrow (TOO4TO) learning materials. It covers the following topic: Sustainable Energy Solutions (Module 4). The material consists of 3 parts. This presentation covers Part 2.
You can find all TOO4TO Modules and their presentations here: https://too4to.eu/e-learning-course/
TOO4TO was a 35-month EU-funded Erasmus+ project, running until August 2023 in co-operation with European strategic partner institutions of the Gdańsk University of Technology (Poland), the Kaunas University of Technology (Lithuania), Turku University of Applied Sciences (Finland) and Global Impact Grid (Germany).
TOO4TO aims to increase the skills, competencies and awareness of future managers and employees with available tools and methods that can provide sustainable management and, as a result, support sustainable development in the EU and beyond.
Read more about the project here: https://too4to.eu/
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. Its whole content reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. PROJECT NUMBER 2020-1-PL01-KA203-082076
Webinar: The cost effectiveness of natural gas combined cycle power plants wi...Global CCS Institute
This webinar will presented the findings of a study to assess the economic viability of natural gas combined-cycle power plants with CO2 capture and storage (NGCC-CCS) in climate change mitigation strategies, emphasising the use of renewable energy and natural gas for electric power generation. In this study, the cost of NGCC-CCS was compared on a level playing field to those of intermittent renewable energy systems (IRES) and energy storage technologies as a means of reducing power sector greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) of NGCC-CCS was compared to that of offshore wind, photovoltaic systems, and concentrated solar power (CSP) together with pumped hydro storage (PHS), compressed air energy storage (CAES), and Li-ion, ZEBRA and Zn-Br battery storage systems. The cost of NGCC-CCS as a backup technology in conjunction with IRES also was assessed.
At this webinar, Machteld van den Broek, senior researcher at the Utrecht University, presented the findings of the study. Her expertise is energy systems modelling and CCS. Among others, she is involved in the CATO-2 programme, the second Dutch national research programme on CCS. During the webinar Niels Berghout, junior researcher at the Utrecht University and co-author of this study, assisted during the Q&A session. Professor Edward Rubin from Carnegie Mellon University also contributed to this study.
Electric vehicles as the future of personal transportation?benboycott
An analysis of three cases against and three cases for electric vehicles. Cases against include: well to wheel carbon emissions, power station requirements and rare earth metal supply. Cases for include: carbon reduction and facilitation of renewable electricity, reduced reliance on oil and health improvements in urban environments.
The document is COGEN Europe's response to the European Commission's Green Paper on energy policy. It supports the Green Paper's goal of establishing a sustainable and secure energy future for Europe. COGEN Europe argues that Europe should prioritize energy efficiency, cogeneration, and renewables. Specifically, it proposes that all new power investments be located on existing heat loads to facilitate cogeneration. COGEN Europe believes this integrated approach focusing on efficiency and decentralization will provide Europe with the cheapest and most sustainable energy system.
Sizing of Hybrid PV/Battery Power System in Sohag cityiosrjce
This paper gives the feasibility analysis of PV- Battery system for an off-grid power station in Sohag
city. Hybrid PV-battery system was used for supplying a combined pumping and residential load. A simple cost
effective method for sizing stand-alone PV hybrid systems was introduced. The aim of sizing hybrid system is to
determine the cost effective PV configuration and to meet the estimated load at minimum cost. This requires
assessing the climate conditions which determine the temporal variation of the insolation in Sohag city. Sizing
of the hybrid system components was investigated using RETscreen and HOMER programs. The sizing software
tools require a set of data on energy resource demand and system specifications. The energy cost values of the
hybrid system agrees reasonably with those published before.
The document discusses sizing a hybrid PV/battery power system in Sohag City, Egypt to meet the power demands of a combined pumping and residential load. It analyzes the feasibility of the system using the RETscreen and HOMER software programs, which require meteorological data and load profiles. The optimal system configured by HOMER consists of 25kW of PV panels, 40 batteries, and a 100kW power converter with a net present cost of $84,171 and cost of energy of $0.151/kWh.
IRJET- Modeling, Simulation and Control of a Photovoltaic Energy System w...IRJET Journal
The document presents a photovoltaic (PV) energy system with a fuel cell backup to ensure continuous operation of connected loads. The PV array normally powers the loads when solar irradiance is within its nominal range. When irradiance falls below a threshold, the fuel cell takes over to feed the loads. The proposed hybrid system is simulated in MATLAB/Simulink. Results show the system can efficiently address the intermittent nature of PV power by integrating a fuel cell backup.
The role of electrofuel technologies in EuropeWouter de Heij
- Renewable electrofuels produced from zero-carbon electricity have lower sustainability risks than biofuels but have much higher production costs than fossil fuels currently.
- For electrofuels to have a low carbon footprint, they require electricity from zero-carbon renewable sources like wind and solar. The regulatory framework needs to ensure additional renewable capacity is built to avoid double counting benefits.
- Large-scale production of electrofuels could meet a significant portion of transport demand by 2050 but would require massive investments in renewable electricity generation and production facilities.
Wind power provides a renewable energy alternative, but has some disadvantages compared to other sources. Onshore wind has lower installation costs than offshore wind, but offshore wind has higher capacity factors and may have fewer social and environmental impacts. Over a turbine's lifetime, installation costs make up about 75% of overall costs. Operation and maintenance costs are also significant, especially for offshore wind where access and repairs are more difficult. For wind power to fulfill its green potential, improvements in battery or energy storage technologies are needed to address the intermittency of wind as a resource.
Solar Power Project (45 MW): Bulgarian Electricity Market Study Simeon Arnaudov
This document summarizes a research project on a proposed 45 MW solar power project in Bulgaria. It includes the following key points:
- The researcher is a PhD candidate studying the Bulgarian electricity market and potential for a private Korean investment in a 20+25 MW solar power plant project.
- The document provides background on Bulgaria's energy market structure, existing renewable energy capacity, and benchmarking of solar capacity in European countries.
- Details of the proposed solar power plant project are given, including location, technology, investment costs, and observations from the researcher on potential improvements.
- Areas for further research are identified such as evaluating successful and unsuccessful practices of past Korean renewable investments in Bulgaria and assessing implications of current
Similar to Leveling the playing field - the economics of electricity generation in Europe (20)
1. The document discusses developing infrastructure for renewable energy in the UK and Wales, noting that energy consumption continues to increase while renewable growth is too slow to meet targets.
2. It summarizes that wind is currently the cheapest form of renewable electricity generation, though costs for other technologies are declining as well.
3. Small-scale systems are poised to revolutionize the electricity generation system beyond just solar, moving away from large-scale utilities.
This document discusses community benefits from renewable energy projects in Wales. It notes that balancing local and regional needs is important when determining community benefit funds. Examples are given of potential annual funds from onshore wind projects of £620,000 and offshore wind projects ranging from £2,000 per MW for smaller projects up to £6,000 per MW for larger ones. Scotland is highlighted as leading the way in establishing long-term community benefit funds from renewable energy through mechanisms like local trusts. The document concludes that close collaboration between stakeholders and continued progress is needed to maximize community benefits from renewable energy development.
This document discusses the economics of renewable electricity sources from multiple perspectives including environmental impact, energy security, and costs. It notes that costs are not always fully accounted for currently and some impacts are difficult to quantify. The author advocates taking a skeptical approach and acknowledges that the transition to renewable energy sources will happen gradually as different actors influence the pace of change.
The document discusses using renewable energy for crisis management. It provides some facts about renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydro, and biomass providing 75% of liquid fuel needs and allowing for onsite production of heat and electricity. It also lists several useful links for information on renewable energy technologies and projects. The document encourages remembering that renewable energy and energy friends can help with remote power needs.
This short document discusses a viral YouTube video from EEA that promotes learning while eating by working smarter instead of harder. The document references the video's URL but is otherwise difficult to understand due to formatting issues and missing words or letters in the text.
This document discusses hydroelectric power potential in Europe. It summarizes that a study by the European Environment Agency (EEA) found the technical potential for hydroelectric power is restricted, but the environmental potential is even more limited after accounting for environmental factors. The study used a database called ECRINS to analyze hydrological data and potential dam sites in catchments. It made assumptions about factors like water flow rates, plant efficiencies, costs, and environmental impacts to estimate potential. While the technical potential is limited, the document suggests focusing on innovating business models to adapt. It also notes that environmental protections like Article 4.7 must be maintained.
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyTomaz Bratanic
GraphRAG for life science domain, where you retriever information from biomedical knowledge graphs using LLMs to increase the accuracy and performance of generated answers
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying AheadWask
https://www.wask.co/ebooks/digital-marketing-trends-in-2024
Feeling lost in the digital marketing whirlwind of 2024? Technology is changing, consumer habits are evolving, and staying ahead of the curve feels like a never-ending pursuit. This e-book is your compass. Dive into actionable insights to handle the complexities of modern marketing. From hyper-personalization to the power of user-generated content, learn how to build long-term relationships with your audience and unlock the secrets to success in the ever-shifting digital landscape.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Jakub Marek
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Ocean lotus Threat actors project by John Sitima 2024 (1).pptxSitimaJohn
Ocean Lotus cyber threat actors represent a sophisticated, persistent, and politically motivated group that poses a significant risk to organizations and individuals in the Southeast Asian region. Their continuous evolution and adaptability underscore the need for robust cybersecurity measures and international cooperation to identify and mitigate the threats posed by such advanced persistent threat groups.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on integration of Salesforce with Bonterra Impact Management.
Interested in deploying an integration with Salesforce for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data WarehouseFederico Razzoli
Are you new to data warehouses (DWH)? Do you need to check whether your data warehouse follows the best practices for a good design? In both cases, this webinar is for you.
A data warehouse is a central relational database that contains all measurements about a business or an organisation. This data comes from a variety of heterogeneous data sources, which includes databases of any type that back the applications used by the company, data files exported by some applications, or APIs provided by internal or external services.
But designing a data warehouse correctly is a hard task, which requires gathering information about the business processes that need to be analysed in the first place. These processes must be translated into so-called star schemas, which means, denormalised databases where each table represents a dimension or facts.
We will discuss these topics:
- How to gather information about a business;
- Understanding dictionaries and how to identify business entities;
- Dimensions and facts;
- Setting a table granularity;
- Types of facts;
- Types of dimensions;
- Snowflakes and how to avoid them;
- Expanding existing dimensions and facts.
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providersakankshawande
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfChart Kalyan
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Leveling the playing field - the economics of electricity generation in Europe
1. Leveling the playing field - An economic assessment of electricity
generation in Europe
Dr David Clubb, CPhys, FIWA
nd
Published 22 August, 2012
1. Abstract
The calculation of the externalities of electricity production is of great importance in shaping the views of
businesses, policy-makers and the public in relation to the value of energy. This paper attempts to draw together
a number of existing studies on aspects of electricity generation in the European Union in order to calculate an
‘Extended Levelised Cost of Electricity’ (eLCOE) which takes account of a wide range of externalities. I use
benefit transfer to calculate a European average value for a number of generating technologies, both
conventional and renewable. I find that the external costs are a significant component of overall electricity
production costs, particularly for conventional generation, but also for biomass. I also estimate the employment
value of various electricity generating technologies, and estimate overall costs of electricity in 2020 by
technology.
The average European levelised cost of electricity by generating type, including externalities, is shown in the
figure below. Onshore wind provides the least-cost electricity generation, and also rates highly in employment
per unit electricity generation and cost.
eLCOE in 2010 (€/GWh, 2005
prices)
External
450,000
400,000
impact
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
-50,000
Extended levelised cost of electricity (eLCOE), i.e. the LCOE plus externalities. Negative externalities indicate
that there is an economic benefit above and beyond the production of electricity itself. The error bars indicate
the range of costs arising from a sensitivity analysis. See full text for details.
2. Employment per unit electricity generation and cost. See full text for details
2. Introduction
Europe’s energy system is entering a transition phase. The established mechanisms of centralised generation,
and top-down transmission and distribution will see a shift unprecedented in the recent history of energy use.
Distributed and intermittent renewable generation will become increasingly important components of the
electricity mix, contributing to energy security and reducing the carbon content of electricity.
However, the field in which renewable energy operates is still not level with respect to its competitors.
Conventional electricity generators benefit economically from an externalisation of impacts which are not
perceived as direct costs to the generator. When costs are not properly allocated to generators, the economics
of the electricity sector are skewed against renewable energy generators, which – by and large – have far lower
external costs than traditional electricity generators.
Economic aspects are important, because decisions which are made on the basis of incomplete information can
result in perverse outcomes. For example, the fact that environmental impacts are generally not included in the
costs of coal extraction and combustion means that coal-fired power stations are more likely to be installed,
because the final product – electricity at the point of use – contains an implicit subsidy which is not borne by the
user or the generator. If better information is made available, then decisions are also likely to be improved.
This paper aims to help make the move towards more complete information on external costs by summing the
outputs of existing studies, or ascribing a value to externalities which are not generally accounted for. It is a
highly complex topic, and I am attempting no more than to draw together the most up to date literature in order
to help inform current thinking.
3. Methodology
Units
The Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE) is the usual way to compare the cost of generating electricity from
different sources. It represents the present value of the total cost of building and operating a generating plant
over an assumed financial lifecycle, converted to equal annual payments and expressed in terms of Euros at a
fixed point in time (herein 2005 unless otherwise stated). I adopt this standard, although I also derive an
additional form – the Extended Levelised Cost of Electricity (eLCOE) – in order to compare different
technologies. The eLCOE includes many of the calculable externalities which arise from electricity generation. I
use GWh as the baseline energy unit, and derive all other outcomes from this. This approach allows maximum
utility in extrapolating these figures for use in different Member States or geographical regions.
Geographic boundaries
I take the European Union Member States as the boundary in terms of data on impacts, although where justified
I use benefit transfer from other regions such as the USA. The use of average figures for the EU is a necessary
1
3. over-simplification, even where some impacts, such as employment, load factors of generating capacity, health
impacts from air pollution, and water use, are highly location-specific. The methodology represents an approach
which could be adopted at a local or regional level in order to derive more appropriate assessments, particularly
considering the geographically-linked nature of many energy sources.
External impact and electricity generation types
The external impacts considered in this paper are Balancing Costs, CO2 Cost, Damage to Materials, Fuel Cost
Volatility, Merit Order Effect, Morbidity and Mortality, Risk Underwriting Cost, Security of Supply, Virtual Grid, and
Water Use Cost.
Balance of Payments and Ecosystem Impacts were also considered. They have not been included, as the
economic impact of a negative balance of payments is unclear, and the economic impacts of ecosystem
damage from electricity generation is incalculable with present knowledge.
The technologies considered are Biomass, Coal (pulverized coal combustion), Geothermal, Natural Gas
(combined cycle), Nuclear, Hydro (small and large), Solar PV and Wind (onshore and offshore). To simplify the
operation, I take the ‘best practice’ within each sector where there are multiple technology types.
I do not consider Concentrating Solar Power, as it is largely predicted to be an ‘import’ technology (i.e. much of
the electricity consumed within Europe will be imported from Turkey or further afield), and deployment will be
1
low by 2020 .
Cost of electricity
A number of organisations provide figures for the LCOE, both for the existing ‘state of the art’ and projecting
costs to 2020. These costs are summarised in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Figure 1: Comparison of LCOE calculated by different Figure 2: Predicted LCOE in 2020; sources as in
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
studies (EC , IEA , CCC , BNEF , ECN , EPIA , JRC ) 9
Figure 1 except for ECF and EGEC
10
For the purposes of calculating the overall cost of electricity I take a numerical average for each technology
(Table 1).
1
International Energy Agency, ‘Technology Roadmap - Concentrating Solar Power’, 2010.
2
European Commission, ‘Energy Sources, Production Costs and Performance of Technologies for Power Generation,
Heating and Transport’, 2008.
3
International Energy Agency, ‘Projected Costs of Generating Electricity’, 2010.
4
Committee on Climate Change, ‘Costs of Low-carbon Generation Technologies’, 2011.
5
M Liebreich, ‘Bloomberg New Energy Finance Summit; Keynote Speech’, 2011.
6
European Climate Foundation, ‘A Zero-carbon European Power System in 2050: Proposals for a Policy Package’, 2010.
7
European Photovoltaic Industry Association, ‘Solar Photovoltaics; Competing in the Energy Sector’, 2011.
8
R Arantegui, ‘Current Costs of the Geothermal Power Technologies’ (presented at the Geothermal electricity workshop,
Brussels, 2011).
9
European Climate Foundation, ‘A Zero-carbon European Power System in 2050: Proposals for a Policy Package’.
10
Jean-Philippe Gibaud, ‘European Vision for Geothermal Electricity Development’ (presented at the Geothermal electricity
workshop, Brussels, 2011).
2
4. Table 1: LCOE values for different
technologies (2005 prices)
Energy LCOE/GWh LCOE/GWh
technology (2007) (2020)
Biomass 136 500 142 500
Coal 87 500 94 333
Geothermal 112 677 97 500
Hydro (large) 90 000 85 000
Hydro (small) 95 500 83 500
Natural gas 85 000 103 333
Nuclear 79 667 83 333
Solar PV 419 213 218 750
Wind (offshore) 100 000 95 000
Wind (onshore) 82 600 66 750
The fact that renewable technologies see such a high relative drop in their levelised cost by 2020 should not
come as a surprise; the learning rates for these technologies are acknowledged to be much higher than their
11 12 13
conventional counterparts , , . The cost of biomass electricity is an exception, and this may reflect its
sensitivity to fuel prices.
Sensitivity analysis
Each of the variables within the total cost has an uncertainty associated with it. The total external cost, and
therefore eLCOE, has a value which is sensitive to each of the inputs. A sensitivity analysis studies how the
variation of each of the variables affects the overall output.
To take an example, the cost of CO2 has been calculated as anything from €0 to over €1 500 per metric tonne. A
sensitivity analysis would recalculate the impacts of electricity generation using various possible values for each
parameter, and demonstrate a range of outcomes.
A sensitivity analysis with two scenarios, ‘renewable friendly’ and ‘conventional friendly’, has been carried out on
the data in this paper. The assumptions are provided in Table 2.
Table 2: Sensitivity analysis assumptions
Variable Renewable Conventional Comment
scenario scenario
Balancing Half Double Balancing costs are not easily quantified; all generators
costs need to be balanced against each other, including
conventional fuels. This simple approach suggests two
regimes which represent higher or lower costs than that
selected from the literature.
CO2 impact €68/ tonne €12/ tonne Low value represents current CO2 market values, which are
likely to underestimate the full consequences of CO 2
emission. High value is the Euro equivalent of the value in
the Stern Report ($85/ tonne)
Pollution Double Half The renewable scenario assumes that the environmental
damage arising from pollution doubles the human health
impact; conventional scenario assumes that the health
impacts are overstated
Hedging Double Half The renewable scenario takes into account some aspect of
the balance of payments impact (i.e. the additional cost of
servicing imports); conventional value assumes a scenario
of much more stable future fossil fuel prices
Occupational No change Marginal impact to overall costs
mortality
Materials No change Marginal impact to overall costs
damage
11
H. Winkler, A. Hughes, and M. Haw, ‘Technology Learning for Renewable Energy: Implications for South Africa’s Long-
term Mitigation Scenarios’, Energy Policy, 37 (2009).
12
European Photovoltaic Industry Association, ‘Solar Photovoltaic Electricity: A Mainstream Power Source in Europe by
2020’, 2009.
13
United Nations Environment Programme, ‘Renewable Energy: Investing in Energy and Resource Efficiency’, 2011.
3
5. Merit order Double Half Renewable scenario takes a less conservative assessment,
and broadens the value to all electricity rather than weighted
by renewable installation level (see comment on page 9).
Conventional scenario assumes that the benefits of the
Merit Order effect are exaggerated
Risk Double Half Renewable scenario assumes a higher level of risk for
underwriting nuclear electricity than calculated, or could also be
considered as a proxy for inclusion of some
decommissioning costs. Conventional scenario assumes
that risks are overstated
Virtual grid No change Marginal impact to overall costs
3 3
Water use €1.2/ m €0.05/ m The renewable scenario uses the Italian ‘water stress’
14
scenario ; low value uses OECD average
Previous studies
Previous studies have considered electricity production externalities (see Table 3). However, they generally
consider the situation in one Member State, or do not consider wider factors such as water use in the course of
electricity generation.
Table 3: Summary of existing studies on electricity externalities
Report Area Comment
15
ExternE (2005) Europe Calculates externalities for specific impacts (such as air pollution, nuclear
accident, noise etc.), but does not provide an overall figure for different
technologies
Umweltbundesamt Germany Germany only; includes a summary of six previous externality reports;
16
(2007) 3% discount rate (0-20 years), 1.5% discount rate (>20 years), 0%
discount rate (inter-generational). Compares fossil fuel and renewable
technologies
17
RECABS (2007) Europe Online calculator which can be used to determine externalities according
to different variables. Documentation provides reference scenario
National Research USA USA-based study which cannot be compared with European figures due
18
Council (2009) to very different environmental and economic factors
Danmarks Denmark Denmark only; focus on airborne pollutants
Miljøundersøgelser
19
(2010)
Vlaamse Flanders Flanders only
Milieumaatschappij
20
(2011)
4. Results
a. Balancing costs
A secure and reliable electricity grid requires that demand and supply match on an instantaneous basis. The
traditional method of operation was straightforward, in that large generators were able to match the changing
load on the network because they had well-defined outputs which could precisely match the predicted demand.
This system is changing as a result of the changing profile of electricity generators. Variable and intermittent
generators, particularly wind and solar, are more difficult to fit to the demand because the difference between
forecasted generation and actual supply is much more likely to be significant than for traditional generators. This
gives rise to an additional need for balancing capacity. However, the potential gap between supply and demand
14
E.M. Jenicek et al., ‘Army Overseas Water Sustainability Study’, US Army Corps of Engineers (2011).
15
ExternE, ‘Externalities of Energy’, 2005.
16
Federal Environment Agency, Germany, ‘Economic Valuation of Environmental Damage; Methodological Convention for
Estimates of Environmental Externalities’, 2007.
17
RECABS, ‘Interactive Renewable Energy Calculator - REcalculator - Renewable Energy Cost and Benefit to Society’, n.d.
18
National research council of the National Academies (USA), ‘Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy
Production and Use’, 2009.
19
Danish Environment Ministry, ‘Environmental costs of emissions’, 2010.
20
Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, ‘Damage costs of current and future electricity production in Flanders’, 2011.
4
6. is likely to be mitigated by an increasing sophistication in energy use, through consumer awareness coupled
with smart metering systems. Improved prediction of output will also mitigate this impact.
The amount of balance capacity increases as the amount of renewable energy generation increases, although
the relationship is not strictly linear. A simplified model of Europe with 100% renewable electricity, supplied by
21
wind and solar power, suggests that the storage energy capacity required would be up to 15% of demand . The
storage (or balancing power) required depends on the energy mix, because some generation types are
complementary, with a decrease in one generator often being compensated for by an increase in another (see
Figure 3). It is also likely that demand-side management, including measures such as smart metering which
allow real-time alteration of electricity use in response to price signals, will improve the ability of the electricity
system to adjust to fluctuating input, and hence reduce the requirement to add balancing capacity.
22
Figure 3: Monthly capacity factor for wind and solar in Germany
The apportioning of fees for balancing capacity varies by Member State. In some countries the fees are passed
on to all consumers by the TSO; in this case, there is an implicit subsidy to the generators which require the
23
biggest balancing capacity. The method of apportioning costs varies greatly between Member States , which
means that providing exact numbers for each technology is not possible.
I apply the cost of €4 000/GWh which is suggested by the upper end of estimates from the European Wind
24
Energy Association (Figure 4), and a more modest value for solar PV estimated as €1 200/GWh .
21
D. Heide et al., ‘Seasonal Optimal Mix of Wind and Solar Power in a Future, Highly Renewable Europe’, Renewable
Energy, 35 (2010).
22
European Photovoltaic Industry Association, ‘Set for 2020’.
23
ENTSO-E, ‘Overview of Transmission Tariffs in Europe: Synthesis 2010’, 2010.
24
Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, ‘Photovoltaics Sector: Valuing the Invaluable’, 2008.
5
7. 25
Figure 4: Result of meta-study on balancing costs for a number of wind regimes
b. CO2
The economic impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions has been placed within a wide spectrum, from zero to
many hundreds of US dollars per tonne. Discussions surrounding the impact are likewise characterised by wide
variety and I do not intend to reproduce them here. I follow the approach adopted in the EEA publication “Costs
26
of Air Pollution from Industrial Facilities in Europe” which uses the short term traded price of carbon in the UK
in 2020, set at €33.6/tonne.
The EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) is currently operating in its second Trading Period, which runs from
2008 until the end of 2012. The vast majority of permits in this Trading Period were freely allocated to
participants in the ETS, so although there is a ‘price’ for carbon, it is not currently borne by the producer, and
can be considered as an externality. I therefore make no distinction between the monetised costs of CO2
produced by ETS participants (generally coal, natural gas and co-fired biomass) and that from lifetime
emissions from renewable electricity generators.
Knowing the Life Cycle Emissions (LCE) of different electricity generating technologies, I can calculate the cost
of CO2 emissions for each type of generator (Table 4).
27
Table 4: LCE of different generating technologies; from average values within Kenny et al , except where
otherwise stated
28 31 32
Energy Biomass Coal Geothermal Hydro Hydro Natural Nuclear Solar Wind Wind
29 30
technology (large) (small) gas PV (offshore) (onshore)
LCE 32 925 15 32 11 437 82 40 30 11
(tCO2/GWh)
CO2 emission 1 075 31 080 504 1 075 370 14 683 2 755 1 344 1 008 370
cost (€/GWh)
c. Damage to materials
In 2008, AEA Technology carried out a modeling exercise to evaluate the impacts of PM 2.5, SO2, NOx, VOC and
33
NH3 on human health and materials . These are the pollutants covered by the Thematic Strategy on Air
25
European Wind Energy Association, ‘Powering Europe: Wind Energy and the Electricity Grid’, 2010.
26
European Environment Agency, ‘Revealing the Costs of Air Pollution from Industrial Facilities in Europe’, 2011.
27
R. Kenny, C. Law, and J.M. Pearce, ‘Towards Real Energy Economics: Energy Policy Driven by Life-cycle Carbon
Emission’, Energy Policy, 38 (2010).
28
Does not include Indirect Land Use Change emissions
29
Hanne Lerche Raadal et al., ‘Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions from the Generation of Wind and Hydro
Power’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (2011).
30
Compatible with A.F. Sherwani, J.A. Usmani, and Varun, ‘Life Cycle Assessment of Solar PV Based Electricity Generation
Systems: A Review’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (2010).
31
Hermann-Josef Wagner et al., ‘Life Cycle Assessment of the Offshore Wind Farm Alpha Ventus’, Energy, 36 (2011).
32
Raadal et al., ‘Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions from the Generation of Wind and Hydro Power’.
33
S Pye et al., ‘Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Proposed Revisions to the National Emission Ceilings Directive. NEC
6
8. 34
Pollution (TSAP), and the power sector is responsible for a significant proportion of them. Damage to crops is
already considered under the CAFE modeling programme, and is therefore included within the ‘Morbidity and
Mortality’ section (Page 9).
35
The estimated annual damage to materials from SO 2 is €1.1 bn in 2000, and €0.7 bn in 2020 . I assume a
linear change in the SO2 emissions giving an annual cost of €0.94 bn for 2008. The sectoral emissions for the
36
same year totalled 3 144 000 tonnes , which means that each emitted tonne of SO 2 had an economic cost on
materials, due to the secondary impacts of acid damage, of €299.
Biomass, coal and gas-fired electricity account for the electricity sector SO 2 emissions, with emission
37
coefficients of 11, 310 and 0.3g/GJ respectively .
The 2009 EU-27 output of heat from combustible fuels was 405 166 GWh, and from electricity was 456 873
GWh. It is not possible to disaggregate the inputs to the heat and electricity sectors, so I make a simple
apportion of damage according to the output. I therefore calculate that 53% of the damage from total SO2
emissions comes from the electricity generation sector, which underestimates its contribution, as efficiency in
combustion to generate electricity is generally lower than efficiency of heat production.
This provides the final damage costs of €6/GWh for biomass, and €157/GWh for coal.
d. Fuel cost volatility
38
A 10% increase in the price of oil is calculated to decrease European GDP by 0.5% ; given a number of recent
oil price shocks, there are clear economic benefits to be obtained from diversifying from those energy sources
which are most heavily dependent on this sector. In the context of this study, the impact acts predominantly on
natural gas-fired electricity, the value of which is strongly coupled to the price of oil. To a lesser extent it impacts
on the other ‘fuel-using’ technologies which use significant quantities of petroleum products in the fuel supply
chain, namely biomass, coal and nuclear.
The hedging value of renewables is more subtle than just lessening exposure to volatility or high fuel prices.
39
High oil prices are linked with a significant economic impact in most oil-importing countries , and the
performance of renewable electricity generation can therefore be seen as having a strongly counter-cyclical
40
impact which further augments its benefits. The hedging benefits may have been first described by Lind , who
described renewable energy investments as a form of ‘national insurance’. Wider macro-economic benefits from
a diversification from fossil fuel include mitigating inflation and interest rate increases, and reducing shock
impacts to stock markets. The economic impact of oil price changes is discussed in detail by Awerbuch and
41
Sauter .
The same authors calculate that the offsetting of oil-induced macro-economic losses are worth $250-$450/kWh
for renewable electricity, which is subdivided into wind and solar ($200/kWh), and geothermal and biomass
($800/kWh) on the basis of capacity factors (23% and 92% respectively). Nuclear electricity is included within
the $800/kWh ‘offset’ section.
42
The RECABS assessment converts this ‘installed capacity’ value to a kWh rate assuming a 5% discount rate
and 20 year life-span, and incorporates it as an additional externality to the cost of gas and coal-fired electricity
generation, at rates of €7 000/GWh and €2 300/GWh respectively.
e. Merit order effect
Several European studies have concluded that renewable energy installations with no fuel costs, such as wind
43,44
energy, act to suppress prices for the consumer . This is because they are used preferentially to supply
CBA Report 3’ (DG Environment, 2008).
34
European Commission, ‘Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution’, 2005.
35
P. Watkiss, S. Pye, and M. Holland, ‘CAFE CBA: Baseline Analysis 2000 to 2020’ (CAFE programme, 2005).
36
European Environment Agency (Copenhagen)., ‘Air Pollutant Emissions Data Viewer (NEC Directive)’, 2010.
37
European Environment Agency (Copenhagen)., Combustion in Energy Transformation Industries; Guidebook, 2009.
38
International Energy Agency, ‘Analysis of the Impact of High Oil Prices on the Global Economy’, 2004.
39
R. Jiménez-Rodríguez, M. Sánchez, and European Central Bank, Oil Price Shocks and Real GDP Growth; Empirical
Evidence for Some OECD Countries (European Central Bank, 2004).
40
R Lind, Discounting for Time and Risks in Energy Policy (Washington D.C.: Resources for the future, 1982).
41
S Awerbuch and R Sauter, Exploiting the Oil-GDP Effect to Support Renewables Deployment (University of Sussex,
SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, 2005).
42
International Energy Agency, ‘Renewable Energy Costs and Benefits for Society - RECABS’, 2008.
43
W. Steggals, R. Gross, and P. Heptonstall, ‘Winds of Change: How High Wind Penetrations Will Affect Investment
7
9. electricity when they are generating, which tends to reduce the exposure of consumers to the marginal
generators, such as open-cycle gas turbines, which are very costly. This effect is known as the ‘merit order
effect’, because it describes the way in which the merit (or cost) of a generator is used to define the stage in the
load profile when it should become operational. An example of this is seen in Figure 5. Wind and hydro, which
have near-zero marginal costs, come first in the merit order. Nuclear electricity is generally used as baseload,
due to its inability to significantly modulate its output (both for economic and practical reasons) and because the
fuel cost is a very small proportion of the overall energy price. Thus, nuclear electricity also comes early in the
merit order.
45
Figure 5: Merit order of marginal production at the Nordic Nord Pool Market
The case of wind energy has been studied far more than any other generator. In this case, the magnitude of the
benefit is about 1% of the spot value of electricity for each percentage point of installed wind capacity (wind is
generally the subject of these studies as it has significant penetration in several Member States). The example
of the effect of wind on electricity prices in West Denmark can be seen in Figure 6. Similar conclusions can be
46
drawn about the case of wind power in Ireland; a 2011 paper shows that the reduction in wholesale market
price of electricity produces a benefit to the consumer greater than the balancing costs; in other words, the
47
additional benefits of reduced CO2 emissions and improved energy security come at no cost .
The merit order effect can only provide some net economic benefit in relation to an average annual electricity
value. In Figure 5 the average demand is signified by the line at 410TWh/year so anything below that line
provides a net benefit. This includes all renewables which operate with near-zero marginal cost, such as solar
photovoltaic.
Incentives in the GB Electricity Sector’, Energy Policy (2010).
44
European Wind Energy Association, ‘Wind Energy and Electricity Prices; Exploring the “Merit Order Effect”’, 2010.
45
H. Lund et al., Danish Wind Power-Export and Cost (Institut for samfundsudvikling og planlaegning, Aalborg Universitet,
2010).
46
E Clifford and M Clancy, ‘Impact of Wind Generation on Wholesale Electricity Costs in 2011’ (Sustainable Energy Authority
of Ireland, EirGrid, 2011).
47
International Energy Agency, ‘Climate and Electricity Annual’, 2011.
8
10. 48
Figure 6: Impact of wind power on spot electricity prices in West Denmark, December 2005
I take this opportunity to clarify that, although the merit order effect applies to all electricity prices, rather than
just those associated with each technology, I cannot logically extrapolate this value across the whole of Europe,
as the installed capacity of each generator type is different in each Member State. Thus I calculate the benefit
for each generator due to its installed capacity (i.e. on a ‘per GWh’ basis). This has the effect of significantly
underestimating the actual benefit.
Table 5: Economic impact of the Merit Order Effect
50
Biomass Coal Geothermal Hydro Hydro Natural Nuclear Solar Wind
49
(large) (small) gas PV
€/GWh n/a n/a n/a Unknown Unknown n/a Unknown 10,000 11,000
It seems reasonable to assume that there is also a merit order effect for nuclear and large hydro; however, there
is no mention of this in the literature, and they have therefore not been included in the overall total.
Note that as the renewable proportion of Europe’s electricity increases, the merit order effect lessens. This is
because additional renewable capacity decreases the ‘full load hours’ (a measure of the annual usage of
generators) of the plants towards the right of the merit order (Figure 5) which decreases the incentive to install
conventional plant.
As the proportion of low-margin production increases, the electricity price will start to track variable costs less,
and fixed costs more. This will be beneficial to consumers as price stability is locked into the system, but the
relative advantage of low marginal-cost generators due to the merit order will be lost.
An additional and significant impact of the growing penetration of renewable electricity will be to increase the
amortisation risk for fuel-consuming generators which will escalate investment costs for new generating plant.
f. Morbidity and mortality
The choice of the value of a statistical life (VSL) significantly influences the economic impacts of mortality and
51
health-related factors. The most recent OECD meta-study suggested a median value of $2,814,000
52
(equivalent to €2,181,412 ). Although different studies demonstrate some variation in the value ascribed to
human life, this does not significantly affect the relative order of the electricity generators in the economic impact
assessment.
The ExternE project states that pollution deaths need to use the Value of a Life Year (VOLY), because “the loss
53
per air pollution death tends to be small”. The value of €40 000 for the EU-25 was obtained in a survey carried
out in nine European countries on ‘contingent valuation’. This method asks how much people would be willing to
48
European Wind Energy Association, ‘Wind Energy and Electricity Prices; Exploring the “Merit Order Effect”’.
49
International Energy Agency, ‘Renewable Energy Costs and Benefits for Society - RECABS’, p. 40.
50
European Wind Energy Association, ‘Wind Energy and Electricity Prices; Exploring the “Merit Order Effect”’.
51
H Lindhjem, S Navrud, and Nils Braathen, ‘Valuing Lives Saved from Environmental, Transport and Health Policies; a
Meta-analysis of Stated Preference Studies’, 2010.
52
Assuming 2% inflation 2010-2011, and an exchange rate of 0.76 in 2010
53
ExternE, ‘Externalities of Energy - Frequently Asked Questions’, n.d.
9
11. pay to reduce health risks associated with air pollution.
In this study I use VSL where there are immediate economic impacts from lives lost (CO 2, occupational
mortality), and VOLY for the economic impacts from pollution which causes long-term reduction in life
expectancy.
Occupational hazard
The renewable energy fuel supply chain is short or non-existent compared with fossil fuel and nuclear electricity.
The expansion of the renewable energy sector thus has potentially significant occupational health benefits. The
obvious exception to this is the biomass sector, which potentially includes the occupations of farming, forestry
and combustion. This accounts for its relatively high mortality rate, second only to the coal supply chain.
There are cogent arguments within the literature that there is some degree of internalisation of the economic
impact of morbidity in the energy sector, through wage values, education and training. In other words,
participants within this sector receive high wages (which are a recognition of the increased risk of their
profession), and there is an additional training burden on those businesses to properly prepare their employees
for work within a relatively hazardous environment. In line with the literature, I therefore calculate the cost of
54
occupational morbidity as 20% of the VSOL value .
Table 6: Economic impact of mortality and morbidity via the fuel supply chain; biomass, coal, natural gas,
55
nuclear figures taken from ExternE , and geothermal, large hydro, solar PV and wind figures taken from the
56
SECURE project
Biomass Coal Geothermal Hydro Hydro Natural Nuclear Solar Wind
(large) (small) gas PV
-4 -4 -7 -6 -5 -5 -8 -7
Mortality 1.6×10 3.1×10 2.0×10 9.7×10 Unknown 4.6×10 1.7×10 2.8×10 3.4×10
/GWh
Cost 74 142 0 4 0 21 8 0 0
€/GWh
Although the occupational benefits are small for some sectors compared with a reduction in by-products
associated with combustion, in terms of directly perceived benefits the fuel supply chain is highly important:
“Whereas many health benefits associated with a reduction in high carbon dioxide emission energy
production may be perceived by some as distant or uncertain, prevention of deaths of energy
workers as a result of an improved occupational safety profile of renewable technologies has the
57
potential to be immediate, obvious, and sizable”.
Societal costs
The by-products of electricity production take various forms, but they are generally detrimental to the
environment. Therefore, human health is also affected; the pathways by which this occurs are well summarised
58
in .
Those pollution impacts which can be quantified are summarised in Table 7.
Table 7: Mortality and morbidity levels, and economic impacts, of electricity generation (excluding supply chain).
59
Economic impact taken from
Economic damage, €/GWh
Pollutant Damage cost Biomass Coal Geothermal Hydro Natural Nuclear Solar Wind
(€/t) (both) gas PV (both)
SOx 6 381 253 7 121 neg. neg. 7 neg. neg. neg.
NOx 6 263 4 757 3 382 neg. neg. 2 007 neg. neg. neg.
NMVOC 513 13 1 514 neg. neg. 3 neg. neg. neg.
PM10 13 851 1 895 997 neg. neg. 45 neg. neg. neg.
PM2.5 21 331 2 534 691 neg. neg. 69 neg. neg. neg.
Pb 965 000 73 28 neg. neg. 1 neg. neg. neg.
54
ExternE, ‘Externalities of Energy’, p. 210.
55
ExternE, ‘Externalities of Energy’.
56
P Burgherr, P Eckle, and S Hirschberg, ‘Final Report on Severe Accident Risks Including Key Indicators’ (Secure project,
2011).
57
Steven Sumner and Peter Layde, ‘Expansion of Renewable Energy Industries and Implications for Occupational Health’,
Journal of the American Medical Association, 302 (2009).
58
D. Pudjianto et al., ‘Costs and Benefits of DG Connections to Grid - Studies on UK and Finnish Systems’, 2006.
59
M Holland, ‘Costs of Air Pollution from Industrial Facilities in Europe’ (European Environment Agency, 2011).
10
12. Cd 29 000 0 0 neg. neg. 0 neg. neg. neg.
Hg 910 000 5 5 1 neg. 0 neg. neg. neg.
As 349 000 12 10 neg. neg. 0 neg. neg. neg.
Cr 38 000 1 1 neg. neg. 0 neg. neg. neg.
PCDD/F 27 000 000 000 4 860 972 neg. neg. 49 neg. neg. neg.
Benzo(a)yprene 1 279 000 5 3 neg. neg. 3 neg. neg. neg.
Indenopyrene 1 279 000 2 6 neg. neg. 4 neg. neg. neg.
Radioactive 0 0 0 0 0 6 000 0 0
waste cost
Total 14 411 14 731 1 0 2 187 6 000 0 0
Although combustion technologies are currently responsible for the majority of pollution from electricity
60
generation, the trend for harmful by-products is continuing to decrease , and the future economic impact from
these sources will follow that trend.
In general, lifetime emissions for renewables except geothermal (secondary emissions) and biomass are
negligible. The most significant pollutant during production of geothermal electricity is H 2S, but no value could
be found in the literature to calculate its economic impact.
Many additional health effects are outwith the scope of this paper, due to the complexity of the systems. They
include:
Ozone production (local) and depletion (global)
Secondary effects which may also indirectly affect human health, such as:
o Climate change-related issues such as temperature change, extreme weather events, sea-level
rise
o Ecological issues, such as deforestation, desertification, biodiversity, disease and changes in
agriculture practice
Nuclear pollution
Nuclear plants are a special case in terms of pollution, as the quantity and impact of radioactivity is more difficult
to quantify and monetise. There is, however, a significant body of literature which has been produced looking at
exactly this issue.
61
The issue of waste was considered by the CE Delft paper , which attempted to create an average value for the
implicit subsidy to managing and storing high-level waste. The paper considered the fact that funding of current
radioactive waste management is partially or fully accounted for by the operators of nuclear facilities in some
countries, whilst final waste management costs are not. It is undeniable that nuclear waste will continue to need
handling, storage and management, and the fact that this is not being funded through current electricity
generation costs mean that there is an implicit subsidy being levied on future storage costs. This subsidy is
calculated as €3 000/GWh.
The subsidy for future waste management is exclusive of the impact of radioactive emissions from the mill
tailings, which have a very small impact but last for an extremely long time. These have been calculated at €3
62
000/GWh . These costs may just be the tip of the iceberg; the Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD reproduced
a table in its 2003 paper on nuclear externalities demonstrating that the tailings account for a very small
component of overall radioactive emissions; 97% of which arise from electricity generation and fuel
63
reprocessing .
Decommissioning costs, which are partly paid for under an operating tax in some countries, are not quantifiable,
but almost certainly represent another subsidy by the State to nuclear power operators. The case of the
Department for Energy and Climate Change in the UK is an illustrative one. In 2009/10, it saw 56% of its net
64
operating costs allocated to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority . In other words, the UK taxpayer is still
paying large amounts for the legacy of activities in the civil nuclear sector more than 50 years ago; the total
60
European Environment Agency, ‘European Union Emission Inventory Report 1990 — 2008 Under the UNECE Convention
on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP)’, 2010.
61
B. A. Leurs et al., Environmentally Harmful Support Measures in EU Members States (CE, Solutions for environment,
economy and technology, 2003), p. 145.
62
International Energy Agency, ‘Renewable Energy Costs and Benefits for Society - RECABS’, p. 33.
63
Nuclear Energy Agency, ‘Nuclear Electricity Generation: What Are the External Costs?’, 2003.
64
Department for Energy and Climate Change, ‘DECC Resource Accounts 2009-2010’ (UK Government, 2010).
11
13. 65
liability for UK nuclear sites is estimated as €51bn . This is an example of mortgaging the wealth of future
generations against the lower cost of electricity to present consumers.
g. Risk underwriting
The operators of fossil fuel and nuclear plants need to insure against far higher risks than their renewable
energy counterparts. Whilst fossil fuel and renewable energy plant operators must accept the full liability, this is
not generally the case for nuclear plant operators.
Nuclear operators are bound by national policy, which in turn is generally defined by an international agreement.
The international legal framework is a complex patchwork of different conventions, which makes it difficult to
understand the liabilities of each party. However, it is clear that the variety of liability between Member States
means that the amount of risk underwriting likewise varies by Member State.
This variation in liability has been highlighted as a matter of concern by the European Economic and Social
Committee:
“A harmonised liability scheme, including a mechanism to ensure the availability of funds in the
event of damage caused by a nuclear accident without calling on public funds, is in the view of the
EESC also essential for greater acceptability of nuclear power. The current system (liability
66
insurance of $700 million) is inadequate for this purpose”
67
A study carried out for the European Commission in 2003 reported a premium of €190/GWh to cover the
68
limited national and international liabilities of €1 500m for France. This is equivalent to €197/GWh in 2005
values. Assuming a ‘liability gap’ for France of €1 409m I calculate that a premium of €0.14/GWh is required per
€m of liability gap.
However, this liability level – €1.5bn – is not grounded on realistic evaluations of the impact of a severe nuclear
accident, as has been amply demonstrated by the events following the Fukushima disaster in March 2011. A
more relevant calculation assumes levels of financial cover such as have been reserved by TEPCO for
compensation related to the Japanese nuclear incident at Fukushima. The total issued in special bonds to cover
69
the liability could reach €83bn (2005 value). These figures are supported by more recent figures from the
70
Japan Centre for Economic Research, which posit a value within the range €48-168bn (2005 value).
I calculate the publicly subsidised risk as the liability difference between the existing levels of private coverage,
and the damage caused by the nuclear disaster at Fukushima. The steps in the calculation are:
Establish the gap between a realistic economic impact of major nuclear incident and the average
insured amount for EU nuclear electricity producers
Calculate the insurance premium which would be required to cover this gap (€0.154/GWh per €m of
liability gap, 2010 values)
Table 8: Nuclear liability, liability gap compared
with €1,500m, and generation capacity per
Member State
Member state Covered Liability Liability
liability gap premium
71,72 73
(€m) (€m) (€m/GWh)
Belgium 550 86 450 13 313
Czech Republic 296 86 704 13 352
65
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, ‘NDA Annual Report and Accounts, 2009/10’, 2010, p. 21.
66
Official Journal of the European Union, ‘Opinion of the EESC on the Nuclear Illustrative Programme’, 2007.
67
Leurs et al., Environmentally Harmful Support Measures in EU Members States, p. 137; Scenario ‘A’ selected for
comparison.
68
Total compensation available under Brussels Convention (2004)
69
The Guardian, ‘Japan Cabinet Approves Fukushima Nuclear Compensation’, 2011.
70
http://www.jcer.or.jp/eng/research/policy.html
71
S Carroll and A Froggatt, ‘Nuclear Third Party Insurance - the “Silent” Subsidy. State of Play and Opportunities in Europe’,
2007, p. 36.
72
World Nuclear Association, ‘Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage’, n.d.
73
Defined as the gap between current liability levels, and the reported economic liabilities of the Fukushima disaster of
€83bn
12
14. Finland 300 86 700 13 352
France 91 86 909 13 384
Germany 2 500 84 500 13 013
Hungary 183 86 817 13 370
Lithuania 50 86 950 13 390
Netherlands 522 86 478 13 318
Romania 550 86 450 13 313
Slovakia 75 86 925 13 386
Slovenia 275 86 725 13 356
Spain 275 86 725 13 356
Sweden 345 86 655 13 345
UK 275 86 725 13 356
Average 449 86 450 13 313
The figures are summarised in Table 8. They demonstrate the average public subsidy value for nuclear
electricity liability in Europe is €13 329/GWh (€11 796/GWh in 2005 values).
This compares rather conservatively with other studies. The Germany Renewable Energy Foundation has
calculated the cost of insuring against real liability for nuclear power in Germany as between €14 000/GWh and
74 75
€230 000/GWh . The ‘Scenario B’ (upper estimate of damages) insurance cost estimated by Leurs and Wit
was €50 000/GWh.
h. Security of supply
Security of supply encompasses a range of aspects, some of which (e.g. hedging, balance of payments) have
already been considered. Here I focus on the aspect of systematic risk related to the mix of electricity
generators.
There are clear benefits to the stability of an electricity system if it distributes energy from a number of different
sources. This reduces the likelihood of systematic collapse, because outages from a particular sector have
proportionally smaller impact as the number of generating sources increases. The increasing resilience of the
system is well-described by Mean-Variance Portfolio (MVP), which is a tool widely used in financial services to
manage risk within a complex and unpredictable economic landscape. Transferring the concept to the power
sector, MVP states that considering generating assets in combination rather than individually lowers the overall
risk. Efficient generating portfolios therefore maximise the expected return on investment for a given risk; or
76
conversely, they minimise risk for a given return . This concept is outlined in Figure 7.
77
Figure 7: Risk-cost combinations for a modelled electricity supply . The most efficient balance of cost/risk
is described by the frontier of the points; in this case the point ‘H’ represents the minimum risk portfolio
between the choices of four assets; wind, nuclear, CCGT and oil combustion.
74
B Gunther et al., ‘Nuclear power plant liability in Germany’ (Bundesverband Erneuerbare Energie, 2011).
75
Leurs et al., Environmentally Harmful Support Measures in EU Members States, p. 137.
76
H. A Beltran, ‘Modern Portfolio Theory Applied to Electricity Resource Planning; MSc Thesis’ (University of Illinois, 2009).
77
Beltran, ‘Modern Portfolio Theory Applied to Electricity Resource Planning; MSc Thesis’.
13
15. A more complete calculation was carried out in 2003 on the existing electricity generating stock in Europe
(Figure 8). This indicates that system security (measured through risk) can be correlated to both cost and
generating mix. Although there is no quantifiable output which can be derived from the literature to ascribe a
cost to ‘generic’ security of supply issues, this approach may suggest an avenue of further research in order to
assist policy-makers with making such an informed decision. For example, I could calculate the difference
between the current energy mix, and a set of possible European scenarios to determine the marginal impact of
a change in each electricity generating type on the portfolio return.
Figure 8: EU energy portfolio, including fuel, O&M and construction period risk for new and existing
capacity. Note that a less risky portfolio can be obtained for the same return by moving horizontally
leftwards from the point of existing electricity generating infrastructure, indicated by the ‘EU 2000 gen mix’
78
box
Note that merely having a diversified energy mix does not of itself reduce overall risk unless price, technology
and correlation are properly considered; in this regard academic studies demonstrate what is suggested by
79
common sense and are an extremely useful tool in analysing the system make-up.
It is interesting to consider what impact the outputs of this paper, particularly the eLCOE, would have upon the
MVP approach for electricity generation. The cost of each generating technology in the eLCOE is different to its
LCOE. This would presumably lead to a greater proportion of renewable energy along the minimum cost
frontier, and support the argument for a greater spread of technology types (i.e. greater proportion of renewable
energy) within the energy mix.
i. Virtual grid
Theory suggests that the installation of decentralised generators, such as renewable energy generators will
influence the costs to the Distribution Network Operator (DNO) in a number of ways. A full description of these
80
impacts is available in the literature ; a brief summary of the main points follows.
Network reinforcement, which is unnecessary at low levels of distributed generation (DG) penetration, increases
progressively with the amount and density of DG. In rural areas this takes the place of upgraded circuits and
substations to cope with voltage rise; urban areas require an upgrade of switchboards to provide additional
protection.
Energy losses will initially decrease as DG is introduced to the network, due to reduced power flows across it.
Losses will also tend to be reduced through the use of any decentralized generator which is embedded near the
end user, as losses in transmission are avoided. Solar PV is the principal contributor to this virtual grid benefit
78
S Awerbuch and M Berger, ‘Applying Portfolio Theory to EU Electricity Planning and Policy-making’ (International Energy
Agency, 2003).
79
M. Sunderkötter and C. Weber, ‘Valuing Fuel Diversification in Optimal Investment Policies for Electricity Generation
Portfolios’ (2009).
80
Pudjianto et al., ‘Costs and Benefits of DG Connections to Grid - Studies on UK and Finnish Systems’.
14
16. because the energy is largely used onsite or close to the generator. I use European Photovoltaic Industry
81
Association (EPIA) figures showing a net economic benefit of €5 000/GWh , noting that this is substantially
82
lower than the suggested average benefit of €14 000/GWh made by RECABS.
The increased electricity input from DG can be handled either actively or passively by a DNO. Active
management requires lesser capital cost but increases the system losses, as components are used to their
maximum potential. Passive management relies on upgrading infrastructure to cope with ‘worst-case scenarios’
from the point of view of large loads being produced by the DG.
There is an additional economic benefit from the ‘capacity replacement value’ which mitigates the requirement
to reinforce the system due to load growth, which arises from the reduced power flows across the network. The
general view of the literature is that distributed generation at a small-scale (which generally refers to solar
photovoltaic, but could also apply to small-scale wind or CHP systems) has a positive economic impact; a
quantitative assessment for all technologies is not possible at this stage.
It is likely that electricity storage will start to play a more significant role in grid operation in the future, and will
help define the content and concept of ‘virtual grids’. Recent work suggests that storage can obviate the need
83
for regulating combustion technology, at a rate of at least 2:1 .
j. Water use
Providing clean drinking water requires energy, and water is needed for most energy generation types. This
energy-water relationship is sometimes referred to as the water-energy ‘nexus’.
Water is a crucial component in Europe’s ecosystems and society. It is also a stressed resource, which is likely
to come under further strain as climate change alters the flow patterns in the future (see Figure 9).
84
Figure 9: Relative change in annual river flow between reference (1961-1990) and scenario (2071-2100)
In order to fully understand the interplay between water and electricity generation, I must delineate two concepts
which are used to describe water use by the sector, namely water withdrawal and water consumption. I define
water withdrawal as the amount which is removed from a water body, regardless of whether it is returned to the
water body or totally consumed. Water consumption is defined as the net loss to the water body as a result of
electricity generating chains; this can happen due to physical loss (such as through evaporation, inclusion in
crops) or because it has become unsuitable for return due to contamination or pollution. I use the figures for
consumption by the electricity generators to calculate economic impact.
Water is used in different ways by the energy sector. Thermal plants (such as biomass, coal, natural gas and
81
European Photovoltaic Industry Association, Greenpeace, ‘Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Empowering the World’, 2011.
82
International Energy Agency, ‘Renewable Energy Costs and Benefits for Society - RECABS’, p. 37.
83
Inc Kema, ‘Research Evaluation of Wind and Solar Generation, and Storage on the California Grid’ (California Energy
Commission, 2010).
84
European Environment Agency, ‘Water Resources: Quantity and Flows — SOER 2010 Thematic Assessment - Thematic
Assessments — EEA’, 2010.
15
17. nuclear) require large amounts of cooling water to cool and condense the steam which drives the turbines. The
amount of water required depends on the overall plant thermal efficiency, fuel type, power plant technology and
the type of cooling. Hydropower operators use water as the ‘fuel input’ to turn the turbines. All generators use
water in their fabrication.
In this study, the thermal efficiency and power plant technology is averaged amongst OECD or European plant.
Regarding the type of cooling, there are two main ways for thermal plant to use cooling water; ‘once-through’
and ‘recirculating’.
As the name suggests, once-through systems extract water, typically from a river or the sea, and then discharge
it (with its thermal energy greatly increased) back to the water body. Leaving aside the ecological effects of this
thermal shock, there are practical implications to the electricity generation system which result from this
mechanism. Any significant impediment to the water intake can cause disruption to the activity of the thermal
plant. This has been amply demonstrated on a number of occasions, most recently in Germany in 2010 when
the Unterweser nuclear power plant had to reduce its output by 60% due to high temperatures of the cooling
85
water . Recirculating or closed-loop cooling systems reuse the cooling water. These technologies withdraw less
water than once-through systems but evaporative water consumption is about 80% higher.
The principal consumption of water in hydropower occurs in evaporative losses from reservoirs. This is clearly a
geographically-sensitive variable, which underlines the need for the information herein to be interpreted with
caution.
Figure 10: Water use of different electricity generators. Water use for the growth of biomass feedstock is
excluded, as is the water temporarily extracted from the flow of the main water body from small hydro
86,87,88,89,90,91,92
(Sources: )
85
www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/auch-atomkraftwerke-machen-bei-hitze-schlapp/1886228.html
86
Kenneth Mulder, Nathan Hagens, and Brendan Fisher, ‘Burning Water: A Comparative Analysis of the Energy Return on
Water Invested’, AMBIO, 39 (2010).
87
B Sovacool, ‘Critically Weighing the Costs and Benefits of a Nuclear Renaissance’, Journal of Integrative Environmental
Sciences, 7 (2010).
88
Annette Evans, Vladimir Strezov, and Tim J. Evans, ‘Assessment of Sustainability Indicators for Renewable Energy
Technologies’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (2009).
89
K Gerdes and C Nichols, ‘Water Requirements for Existing and Emerging Thermoelectric Plant Technologies’ (National
Energy Technology Laboratory, 2009).
90
C Clark et al., ‘Water Use in the Development and Operation of Geothermal Power Plants’ (US Department of Energy,
2010).
91
Alexandre Stamford da Silva and Fernando Menezes Campello de Souza, ‘The Economics of Water Resources for the
Generation of Electricity and Other Uses’, Annals of Operations Research, 164 (2008).
92
Vasilis Fthenakis and Hyung Chul Kim, ‘Life-cycle Uses of Water in U.S. Electricity Generation’, Renewable and
16
18. There are many studies on the water use of electricity generating plant. I analysed the outputs of seven different
studies or meta-studies. There is some variation in values, which is frequently a result of methodological
choices or technology types; however, most studies produce values which are roughly aligned, and I take an
average of these and discard the outliers. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 10. Note that I do not
include in the biomass figures the water used to grow the feedstock
In order to determine the economic impact for each generator type due to water usage, I need to establish the
93
value of water. Methodologies for this calculation exist (e.g. ), but are generally complex and site-specific. I
need to take a broader approach which uses an acceptable average for Europe as a whole.
94 3
According to the OECD , the cost to the household user in Europe is approximately $1.75/m . The cost to
industry of abstracting groundwater or surfacewater is lower, and ranges from zero to something approaching
3 3 95
Full Cost Recovery (FCR), such as the Netherlands (€1/m ) and Denmark (€0.55/m ) . Countries where the
charge is low generally do not include FCR which is the guiding principle behind water pricing according to the
Water Framework Directive. Recent research has suggested a price increase of between 20% and 400% on
96
current charges to reach FCR. In order for FCR to be met in Cyprus in 2010, predicted irrigation charges will
3 3
need to be raised from €0.17/m to €0.53/m .
3
With a wide spread of values for water, I select something of an average value of €0.5/m . The influence this
has on the cost of electricity is further explored in the sensitivity analysis; Table 9 summarises the costs of water
97
use for each technology. Most of Europe will experience increasing water scarcity in the coming decades , so it
is almost certain that the societal costs of water consumption due to electricity generation will also rise.
Table 9: Cost of water consumption by electricity generation technology (2005 values)
Biomass Coal Geothermal Hydro Hydro Natural Nuclear Solar Wind
(small) (large) gas PV
Water use 1 533 1 711 1 079 0 3 400 681 2 700 0 0
3
(m /GWh)
Cost (€/GWh) 678 757 477 1,504 0 301 1,195 0 0
5. Discussion
a. Cost of electricity
My findings are clear. The economic impacts of electricity generation, above and beyond the market cost, are
positive for wind and solar PV, and negative for the other generators considered in this paper. Coal-fired
electricity emerges as the technology with the largest negative external impact (Figure 11).
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (2010).
93
Stamford da Silva and Campello de Souza, ‘The Economics of Water Resources for the Generation of Electricity and
Other Uses’.
94
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation Services’,
2010.
95
J. Berbel, J. Calatrava, and A. Garrido, ‘Water Pricing and Irrigation: a Review of the European Experience’, Irrigation
Water Pricing Policy: The Gap Between Theory and Practice. CABI, IWMI (2007).
96
C. Zoumides and T. Zachariadis, ‘Irrigation Water Pricing in Southern Europe and Cyprus: The Effects of the EU Common
Agricultural Policy and the Water Framework Directive’, Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 3 (2009).
97
European Environment Agency, ‘Adapting to Climate Change - SOER Thematic Assessment’, 2010, p. 15.
17
19. 60000
Water
50000
Virtual grid
40000 Risk underwriting
30000 Merit order effect
Materials damage
20000
Occuaptational risk
10000
Hedging
0 Pollution
-10000 CO2
Balancing costs
-20000
Figure 11: External costs of electricity generation, € /GWh
However, the externalities alone do not provide the most appropriate way to consider the cost of electricity. In
order to gain a true understanding of the picture, I need to add the externalities to the LCOE. In doing so I obtain
a new ‘Extended’ Levelised Cost of Electricity (eLCOE) which is presented in Figure 12.
eLCOE in 2010 (€/GWh, 2005 prices)
450,000 External
400,000
350,000 impact
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
-50,000
Figure 12: Extended levelised cost of electricity (eLCOE), i.e. the LCOE plus externalities. Negative externalities
indicate that there is an economic benefit above and beyond the production of electricity itself. The error bars
indicate the range of costs arising from a sensitivity analysis.
The result of including a wide range of externalities into the costs of electricity production demonstrate that
‘business as usual’ burdens human health and the environment with large costs, and that a transition to a low-
carbon energy system will have multiple benefits beyond simple CO2 reduction.
I exclude from this analysis those factors which are already incorporated into pricing mechanisms, such as costs
for forecast error in variable generators. In other words, I assume that these are already incorporated into the
LCOE. I am also unable to calculate the impact for a number of external factors, including ecosystem impacts,
second-order climate change impacts of combustion such as increased sanitation and parasite-related health
problems, desertification, deforestation etc; and the health impacts from a number of combustion by-products
such as PCBs, Cu, Se and Zn.
Using existing references to provide an average value for LCOE in 2020, I can also generate an eLCOE for
2020 (. I assume that external impacts remain the same with the exception of pollution costs, which are reduced
by 50% due to improved technology and efficiency. The significant change is the overall cost of solar PV, and
the improved position of geothermal with respect to conventional generation.
18
20. eLCOE in 2020 (€/GWh, 2005 prices)
250,000
External impact LCOE
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
-50,000
Figure 13: Extended levelised cost of electricity (eLCOE), i.e. the LCOE plus externalities. Negative externalities
indicate that there is an economic benefit above and beyond the production of electricity itself. The error bars
indicate the range of costs arising from a sensitivity analysis.
b. Employment
98
The creation of new jobs is increasingly being seen as a positive ‘externality’ of activity in different sectors , and
there is considerable enthusiasm in the renewable energy sector for being able to demonstrate a high
employment factor for the sector.
The value of employment to an economy is defined through the internationally agreed System of National
99
Accounts . Within this framework, individuals supply labour that generates 'compensation'. This compensation
is a monetary unit which is the component of the ‘generation of income’ account directly attributable to
employment. Simply put, the income derived from a paid activity can be considered a direct economic benefit
equivalent to the value of the income. However, there is sufficient uncertainty in the accuracy of the estimates of
job creation to lead me to exclude this component from the overall value, and instead to use it as an external
indicator of additional value.
To determine this value, I need to calculate the number of jobs created through the construction and operation
of electricity generating plant (levelised over its lifetime), and the value of the employment to the individual.
I use the outputs of a meta-study aggregating many different individual assessments on employment per
100
GWh over the lifetime of the generating technology. This paper calculates direct and indirect jobs only;
induced employment (which is that created by economic activity carried out by direct and indirect employment)
is not included. Jobs within the offshore wind and large hydro sectors are also not provided.
101
I assume a sector average salary for renewable energy employees of €58 601 . Although the salary for the
renewable energy sector is US-based (rather than European), it represents a relatively up-to-date figure, and is
probably broadly representative of the European figures. I also assume that this salary is representative of
wages in the ‘conventional’ energy sector.
I multiply the average job-years/GWh by the average energy sector salary to obtain an employment value for
98
C. Tourkolias and S. Mirasgedis, ‘Quantification and Monetization of Employment Benefits Associated with Renewable
Energy Technologies in Greece’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (2011).
99
EC, IMF, OECD, UN, WB, ‘System of National Accounts 2008’ (EC, IMF, OECD, UN, WB, 2009), p. 22,33.
100
Adapted from Max Wei, Shana Patadia, and Daniel M. Kammen, ‘Putting Renewables and Energy Efficiency to Work:
How Many Jobs Can the Clean Energy Industry Generate in the US?’, Energy Policy, 38 (2010).
101
Simply Hired, ‘Renewable Energy Salaries’, 2011.
19
21. each electricity generating technology, which is then levelised by the electricity output (Table 10).
Table 10: Employment value/GWh
of different electricity generators
Energy Average Annual
technology job years/ value (€)
GWh
Biomass 0.21 12 306
Coal 0.11 6 446
Geothermal 0.25 14 650
Natural gas 0.11 6 446
Nuclear 0.14 8 204
Small hydro 0.27 15 822
Solar PV 0.87 50 982
Wind 0.17 9 962
This demonstrates that labour-intensive operations (particular solar PV) generate significant employment
benefits. However, this is a rather simplistic way of considering the issue. More relevant to most policymakers
will be the economic benefit from employment, levelised by both the electricity output and the cost of that
electricity.
This additional step is calculated by dividing the economic benefit for each technology by the LCOE. This
provides me with an ‘Electricity Employment Factor’ (EEF) presented in Figure 14. This factor is dimensionless,
as I am dividing a value of employment in €/GWh by the LCOE, which has the same units.
Figure 14: EEF ( levelised by electricity generation and LCOE)
However, this picture is, once again, too simplistic, because the use of LCOE does not include the externalities
which accrue from using each electricity generating technology. The most relevant metric is therefore the
employment value, divided by eLCOE (Figure 15). The main difference between the LCOE and eLCOE figures
for employment is the improved position of biomass compared with nuclear.
20
22. Figure 15:EEF (levelised by electricity generation and ELCOE)
Questions have been raised about whether net jobs are created by the renewable energy sector, or whether
they are merely displaced from other sectors. The results of four studies in Germany are clear; that the sector
102
creates significant additional employment above and beyond any displacement effect . My calculations
validate this result. All these developments take place within the same sector, and so the comparison
demonstrated by Figure 15 is valid; in other words, employment on a hydropower project creates jobs additional
to those that would have been created from producing the same amount of electricity in a coal-fired generator.
The marginal benefit is the difference between the EEF of the different generating types.
I can therefore conclude that when externalities are taken into account, renewable electricity generators
demonstrate a very strong economic benefit related to employment, compared with conventional generators.
6. Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Rina Bohle Zeller of Vestas for her comprehensive knowledge on the water use of different
electricity generating technologies. I would also like to thank Alfredo Sanchez Vicente, Arthur Girling, Bitten
Serena and Cinzia Pastorello for their personal support during the preparation of the paper.
This work was carried out during my period of employment at the European Environment Agency, between 2010
and 2012.
102
Federal Environment Agency, Germany, ‘Report on the Environmental Economy 2009’, 2009, p. 32.
21