Presentation of initial findings of PriDE project, University of Bath (http://digilitpride.wordpress.com) from the Learning in the Disciplines launch event (http://disciplinarythinking.wordpress.com) Feb 2012.
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Learning in the disciplines event Feb 2012
1. Professionalism in the Digital Environment (PriDE) Project sponsor: Gwen van der Velden Project manager: Kyriaki Anagnostopoulou Project officer: Vic Jenkins Project officer: Nitin Parmar Project officer (Dissemination): Sarah Turpin Project Adviser: Matt Benka
2.
3. Faculty Learning Community Faculty Learning Community Faculty Learning Community School Learning Community Division for Lifelong Learning UKOLN VITAE SCAP STUDENTS UNION PriDE Project Team PriDE Steering Group ETC Institutional Learning Community Student engagement
4.
5. “ A digitally literate person in the Faculty of Engineering and Design should be proficient in retrieving, managing, evaluating, sharing, presenting relevant information, supported by access to the appropriate hardware and software.” Initial outputs and findings from the FLCs “ A digitally literate person in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Science is critically and ethically aware, confident in engaging in a wide array of digital practices, resources/tools and academic and professional environments, and in establishing coherent identities.”
Introduction to project JISC/national context Institutional context – SEWG, SU Brief overview of phases
Faculty Learning Communities Variety of activities to prompt discussion and capture data Looking at this from change management perspective Releasing all FLC resources as OER
Findings and outputs of the Faculty Learning Communities Faculty-specific sets of learner digital literacy attributes: access, skills, practices, identity Faculty definition of digital literacy
Analysing disciplinary differences Focussing on different skills Different priorities within the skill sets Variations in language used to describe DL Skills or practice? Levels of granuarity
Implications for design of staff development and support materials for various groups