Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byMarek Nahotko
Knowledge organization in publishing
The document outlines Dr. Marek Nahotko's perspective on scientific publishing and knowledge organization. It discusses knowledge models like the knowledge pyramid and knowledge processes cycle. It examines publishing models like the information chain and Björk's SPLC model. It defines knowledge organization as tools that provide access to knowledge resources and outlines KOS approaches. It proposes a PKO model where publishing is viewed as a form of knowledge organization. It analyzes kinds of KOS by medium and intention and tools of KOS like standards and procedures. It applies the models to print and digital publications and concludes the PKO model allows simultaneous presentation of knowledge and publishing processes.
More Related Content
Knowledge organization in publishing
- 1. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION PERSPECTIVE ONSCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING Outline of the concept Dr hab. Marek Nahotko 1Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 2.
- 3. Knowledge model: knowledgepyramid 3Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 4. Knowledge model: knowledgeproceses cycle Package Publish Decide Enable Collaborate Integrate Processin g data Managinginformation Building Knowledge Acquire Transform By Hackathorn 1999 4Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 5. E2E knowledge model 5Warszawa,15-16.04.2013 By Faucher 2010
- 6.
- 7. Publishing model: informationchain Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 7
- 8. Publishing model: Björk’sSPLC Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 8 By Björk, Hedlund 2003
- 9.
- 10. Knowledge organization • B.Sosińska-Kalata: Research and practice area related to tools preparation, which aim is to provide quick and efficient access to knowledge resources; • KOS: structures, tools and methods used to knowledge organization in various types of environments and for a variety of specific objectives. 10Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 11. KOS by B.Hjørland • Two approaches to KOS: • Narrow interpretation, typical for information science (document description, indexing and classification); • Broader interpretation, meaning social division of mental labour, where KOS are associated with production and distribution of „knowledge”, organization of publications, traditions, disciplines and people in different cultures. 11Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 12. KOS in abroad sense • Any structure that serves to confer some knowledge resources of the organizational structure, that facilitates users to access the knowledge (B. Sosińska-Kalata). • Tools: • Libraries, traditional and digital* • Museums and e-museums • Archives and e-archives • Encyclopaedia and e-encyclopaedia • Repositories of digital documents • Knowledge portals and also • Division of scientific areas and disciplines used to organize scientific activities • Division of areas of practice activities used to work and labour organization. 12Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 *In bold are publishing manifestations
- 13. Publishing as KO(PKO model) 13Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 14. Terminology PKO model Before DataData Metadata ? DOS ? Informations Informations Metainformations Metadata IOS KOS Knowledge Knowledge KOS ? Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 14
- 15. Kinds of KOS •By medium: • Hybrid KOS • Article • Research article • Review article • Book • Book chapter • Scientific conference paper • Dissertation • Electronic KOS • Rich Internet Publication (RIP) • Semantic publications • Paragraph • Sentence • Blog • Twitts • Wiki • By intention • KOS intended for scientists – as above • KOS intended for specialists • Article in specialist journal • Chapter in reference book • Professional conference paper • Patent • KOS intended for broad audience • Popular science article published in magazine, newspaper • Popular science book 15Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 16. Tools of KOS(standardization) • Standards for structures • Content modularization (IMRaD, IDCRD, EASE)* and editorial composition • Content visualization • Content coding (XML/RDF) • Abstract structures • Notes and bibliography styles (Vancouver, Harvard, APA styles) • Aggregation of digital objects • Ontologies of publication • Standards for rules • Scientific publication styles (EASE) • Ethics and good practices rules (GSP) • Conflicts of interests removing (COI) • Authorship settlement (Vancouver Protocol) • Standards for procedures • Deduction procedures (during research, represented by type of publication: theoretical, experimental, review) • Instruction and styles for authors (of publishers) • Instructions and forms for reviewers • Content evaluation rules • Procedures of topic, co-authors and publisher/journal title choices 16Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 *In parenthesis are examples
- 17.
- 18. Application: KOS andIOS in print 18 KOS separated from IOS Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 19. KOS and IOSin digital environment 19 KOS closer to IOS Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 20. KOS and IOSin new digital publications 20 KOS integrated with IOS Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
- 21. Conclusions • PKO model(Publishing as KO) allows simultaneous presentation of knowledge and publishing processes; • It uses results of previous works in both directions; • A comprehensive view on the processes allows the terminology rearrangement; • The model can be used to investigate and explain the phenomena associated with scientific publishing (and more broadly – with communicating), including its transformation into an electronic form. Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 21
- 22. Thank you foryour attention 22 marek.nahotko@uj.edu.pl Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013