Kenett On Information NYU-Poly 2013

Financial and Risk
Applications of InfoQ
Prof. Ron S. Kenett
KPA Ltd., Raanana, Israel
Universita degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
NYU Poly, New York, USA
ron@kpa-group.com

Three case studies (1/3)
1. Predicting Changes in Quarterly Corporate
Earnings Using Economic Indicators
http://galitshmueli.com/content/predicting-changes-quarterly-
corporate-earnings-using-economic-indicators
This study looks at corporate earnings in relation
to an existing theory of business forecasting
developed by Joseph H. Ellis (former research
analyst at Goldman Sachs).
2

2. Predicting ZILLOW.com’s Zestimate accuracy
http://galitshmueli.com/content/predicting-zillowcom-s-zestimate-
accuracy
Zillow.com is a free real estate service that
calculates an estimated home valuation
("Zestimate") as a starting point for anyone to see
for most homes in the U.S. The study looks at the
accuracy of Zestimates.
3

3. Predicting First Day Returns for Japanese IPOs
http://galitshmueli.com/content/predicting-first-day-returns-
japanese-ipos.
An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the first sale of
stock by a company to the public. The study looks
at the first-day returns on IPOs of Japanese
companies.
4

InfoQ(f,X,g) = U( f(X|g) )
Depends on quality of g, X, f, U and relationship between them
The potential of a particular dataset
to achieve a particular goal using a
given empirical analysis method
5
g A specific analysis goal
X The available dataset
f An empirical analysis method
U A utility measure
Information Quality
Kenett, R.S. and Shmueli , G. (2013) On Information Quality, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1464444
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (with discussion), 176(4).

Analysis goal
g
Explain, predict, describe
enumerative, analytic,
exploratory, confirmatory
Goal Specification
• “error of the third kind” - giving the right answer to the wrong
question – Kimball
• “Far better an approximate answer to the right question, which
is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong question,
which can always be made precise” - Tukey
6

Analysis goal
g
7
Goal 1. Decide where to launch improvement initiatives
Goal 2. Highlight drivers of overall satisfaction
Goal 3. Detect positive or negative trends in customer satisfaction
Goal 4. Identify best practices by comparing products
Goal 5. Determine strengths and weaknesses
Goal 6. Set up improvement goals
Goal 7. Design a balanced scorecard with customer inputs
Goal 8. Communicate the results using graphics
Goal 9. Assess the reliability of the questionnaire
Goal 10. Improve the questionnaire for future use
Typical Goals of Customer Surveys

X
Available data
Data Source
• Primary, secondary
• Observational, experiment
• Single, multiple sources
• Collection instrument, protocol
Data Type
• Continuous, categorical, semantic
• Structured, un-, semi-structured
• Cross-sectional, time series, panel,
network, geographical
Data Quality
• “Zeroth Problem - How do the data relate to the problem, and
what other data might be relevant?” - Mallows
• Quality of Statistical Data (IMF, OECD) - usefulness of summary
statistics for a particular goal (7 dimensions)
Data Size and
Dimension
• # observations
• # variables
8

f
Data analysis
method
Analysis Quality
• “poor models and poor analysis techniques, or even analyzing the
data in a totally incorrect way.” - Godfrey
• Analyst expertise
• Software availability
• The focus of statistics education
Statistical models and methods
• Parametric, semi-, non-parametric
• Classic, Bayesian
Data mining algorithms
Graphical methods
Operations research methods
9

Utility measure
U
Utility Measure
• Adequate metric from analysis standpoint (R2, holdout data)
• Adequate metric from domain standpoint
• Predictive accuracy, lift
• Goodness-of-fit
• Statistical power, statistical significance
• Strength-of-fit
• Expected costs, gains
• Bias reduction, bias-variance tradeoff
10

11
Goal of study:
1. Predict the final price of an Ebay
auction at start of auction
2. Predict price during ongoing
auction
3. Predict the auctions with the
highest prices (ranking)
4. Identify factors that determine the
final price of an eBay auction?
“Pennies from ebay: The
determinants of price in
online auctions”
Lucking-Reiley D., Bryan D.,
Prasad N. & Reeves D.
Journal of Indust. Econ., 2007
An example….
X
Available data
Analysis goal
g

12
 461 eBay coin auctions (Indian Head pennies)
 Auction characteristics
 Duration
 Open and close prices
 Number of bids and bidders
 Secret reserve price
 Weekday/weekend ending
 Seller characteristics
 Seller rating
 Item characteristics
 Year and grade of coin
X
Available data
“Pennies from ebay: The
determinants of price in
online auctions”
Lucking-Reiley D., Bryan D.,
Prasad N. & Reeves D.
Journal of Indust. Econ., 2007

13
Dimension Reduction
f
Data analysis
method
An example….

14
Prediction error:
• Holdout data
• Metrics such as MAPE
and RMSE
f
Data analysis
method
Utility measure
U
An example….

Statistical Approaches for Increasing InfoQ
Study Design (Pre-Data)
• DOE
• Clinical trials
• Survey sampling
• Computer experiments
Post-Data-Collection
• Data cleaning and
preprocessing
• Re-weighting, bias
adjustment
• Meta analysis
Randomization, Stratification,
Blinding, Placebo, Blocking,
Replication, Sampling frame,
Link data collection protocol
with appropriate design
Recovering “real data” vs.
“cleaning for the goal”
Handling missing values,
outlier detection, re-
weighting, combining results 15

Assessing InfoQ
“Quality of Statistical Data”
(Eurostat, OECD, NCSES,…)
• Relevance
• Accuracy
• Timeliness and punctuality
• Accessibility
• Interpretability
• Coherence
• Credibility
InfoQ dimensions
1. Data resolution
2. Data structure
3. Data integration
4. Temporal relevance
5. Chronology of data and goal
6. Generalizability
7. Operationalization
8. Communication
3 V’s of Big Data
• Volume
• Variety
• Velocity
Marketing Research
• Recency
• Accuracy
• Availability
• Relevance 16
4 V’s of Big Data
• Volume
• Variety
• Velocity
• Veracity

#2 Data Structure
Data Types
• Time series, cross-sectional, panel
• Structured, semi-, non-structured
• Geographic, spatial, network
• Text, audio, video, semantic
• Discrete, continuous
Data Characteristics
Corrupted and missing
values due to study design
or data collection
mechanism
18

19
www.riscoss.eu
Managing Risk and Costs in OSS Adoption
#2 Data Structure

21
Who talks
to whom?
IRC chat archives: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/IRC/WebHome
XWiki Community
#2 Data Structure

XWiki Community
Use association rules
To characterize the
content of the
clusters (tm, arules)
#2 Data Structure

XWiki Community
#2 Data Structure

#3 Data Integration
Linkage, privacy-preserving
methods: Increase or
decrease InfoQ?
24

#4 Temporal Relevance
Analysis Timeliness
(solving the right
problem too late)
Data
Collection
Data
Analysis
Study
Deployment
t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6
Collection Timeliness
(relevance to g)
g: Prospective vs. retrospective; longitudinal vs. snapshot
Nature of X, complexity of f
forecast
25

#5 Chronology of Data & Goal
Data: Daily AQI in a city
g1: Reverse-engineer AQI
g2: Forecast AQI
Retrospective/prospective
Ex-post availability
Endogeneity
26
http://www.airnow.gov/?action=aqibasics.aqi

#6 Generalizability
Statistical
generalizability
Scientific
generalizability
Definition of g
Choice of X, f, U 27

#7 (Construct) Operationalization
χ construct
X = θ(χ) operationalization (measurable)
• Causal explanation vs.
prediction, description
• Theory vs. data
• Data: Questionnaire,
physio measurement
28

#7 (Action) Operationalization
29
http://www.spcpress.com/pdf/DJW187.pdf

#7 Operationalization
30
National Education Goals
Panel (NEGP)
recommended that states
answer four questions on
their student reports:
1. How did my child do?
2. What types of skills or
knowledge does his or her
performance reflect?
3. How did my child
perform in comparison to
other students in the
school,
district, state, and, if
available, the nation?
4. What can I do to help
my child improve?

31
http://sat.collegeboard.org/practice/sat-skills-insight/writing/band/200

32
http://sat.collegeboard.org/practice/sat-skills-insight/writing/band/200

33
When asked what the 18% in line 1 meant,
53% of the policy makers responded incorrectly
1992 NAEP
Executive
Summary Report
#8 Communication
43162

34
#8 Communication
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/itemmaps/index.asp

35
#8 Communication

36
#8 Communication

37
#8 Communication

38
#8 Communication

39
#8 Communication

40
The Israeli version……
#8 Communication
http://rama.education.gov.il
'
N"N"N"
"18,68450110213,182521875,502454118
"21,40750010014,466524846,941444111
"20,6445249114,787536805,857496106
"19,1655248613,379532775,786506101
"19,6315327613,961537735,67051981
* "20,2225287713,957541706,26549882

41
http://www.madlan.co.il/education/schools
#8 Communication

Assessing InfoQ in Practice
Rating-based assessment
1-5 scale on each dimension:
InfoQ Score = [d1(Y1) d2(Y2) … d8(Y8)]1/8
Experience from two research methods courses
– Preparing a PhD research proposal (U Ljubljana, 50
students, goo.gl/f6bIA)
– Post-hoc evaluation of five completed studies (CMU,
16 students, goo.gl/erNPF) 42
# Dimension Note Value Index
1 Data resolution 5 1.0000
2 Data structure 4 0.7500
3 Data integration 5 1.0000
4 Temporal relevance 5 1.0000
5 Generalizability 3 0.5000
6 Chronology of data and goal 5 1.0000
7 Concept operationalization 2 0.2500
8 Communication 3 0.5000
InfoQ Score = 0.68
InfoQ=68%

InfoQ: Strengths and Challenges
InfoQ approach streamlines questioning of data value
• “Why should we invest in data?” – management
• Compare value of potential datasets, analyses
• Prioritize/rank projects
• Strengthen functional – analytical relationship
Multiple goals:
• Goals can change during study: Reevaluate InfoQ
• Multiple goals: Prioritize.
– clinical trials: effect of new drug, adverse effects
To Do:
• Improve InfoQ assessment
• Alternative InfoQ assessment approaches (pilot study, EDA, other)
• Further dimensions (data privacy, human subject compliance and risk)
• Effect of technological advances on InfoQ 43

Primary Data Secondary Data
- Experimental - Experimental
- Observational - Observational
Data
Quality
Information
Quality
Analysis
Quality
Knowledge
g A specific analysis goal
X The available dataset
f An empirical analysis method
U A utility measure
1.Data resolution
2.Data structure
3.Data integration
4.Temporal relevance
5.Chronology of data and goal
6.Generalizability
7.Operationalization
8.Communication
What
How
Goals InfoQ(f,X,g) = U(f(X|g))
Information Quality

Russom, P., Big Data Analytics, TDWI Best Practices Report, Q4 2011
Massive data sets
1. Data resolution
2. Data structure
3. Data integration
4. Temporal relevance
5. Chronology of data and goal
6. Generalizability
7. Operationalization
8. Communication
Big data Analytics

Stages in economic downturn: 1) the peak, 2) modest slowing, 3) intensifying
worrying by investors (a lot of panic selling occurs in this stage), and 4) the
advent of recession. Can we predict the economic slowdown in corporate
earnings (S&P 500 EPS) well in advance?
Ellis claims (based on observations) there is a 0-9 month lag between wages
and its effect on consumer spending. 0-6 months until changes in consumer
spending affects changes in industrial production. Another 6-12 months
between industrial production and capital spending. And finally, another 6-12
between capital spending and its effects on Corporate Profits.
46

Ellis model:
47

The data: i) 180 quarters. 6 [Economic] x variables. Ii) Change
in S&P EPS = y variable, iii) All variables transformed to year vs
year % change, iv( All data used is publicly available via websites
of US agencies: BEA, BLS, FED, and S&P.
The analysis: XLMiner on these different versions of datasets.
Partitioned it. Ran predictor applications: ACF Plots, MLR,
Regression Tree – full and pruned.
48
Auto Correlation Chart. Based on this, took Lag_1
as one of the predictors. Lag_1 = QEPS_YY(Q-1)

49
QEPS_YY%(t) = 0.0486 + 0.747*QEPS_YY%(t-1) -0.517*QRCAP_YY%(t-2)
1 Data resolution quarterly data 2 0.2500
2 Data structure no externalities 3 0.5000
5 Generalizability 5 1.0000
6 Chronology of data and goal quarterly data 3 0.5000
InfoQ Score = 0.66
InfoQ=66%

50
 “Zillow.com” is a real
estate service launched
in 2006
 It calculates a
Zestimate-home
valuation for most
homes in the U.S
For MD and VA it gets
only about 26% of
predictions within the
+/-5% range only.
1.Home Type (Single Family, Condo , etc)
2.No of Bed Rooms
3.No of Bath Rooms
4.Total Area –Sqft
5.Lot size –Sqft
6.No of Stories
7.Total Rooms
8.Distance from Metro
9.Primary School Rank
10.Middle School Rank
11.High School Rank
12.Age of house at Sale
13.Sale Season (Fall , Winter , etc)
14.Recession Period (Y/N)
15.Sales Volume

51
• Data collected, cleansed and
merged from 4 sources –Zillow
, Redfin, School Digger and
Google Maps
• 17 counties (29 Zip codes) in
Northern VA
House sales data
• Before Data Clean up: 3500+
• After Data Clean up: 1416
• Y –Is Zestimate correct (Y/N)
37.6%/62.43%
• X –15 variables (5+ variables
where discarded from initial
set )

52
1 Data resolution by individual house 5 1.0000
2 Data structure no externalities 4 0.7500
5 Generalizability only VA counties 3 0.5000
6 Chronology of data and goal 5 1.0000
InfoQ Score = 0.82
InfoQ=82%

53
http://www.madlan.co.il/education/schools

Goal: To predict the First Day returns on Japanese IPOs (based on first day closing price),
using public information available prior to the offer
The data: i) Japanese IPO data from 1997-2009*, ii) 1561 IPOs, iii) Industry(categorical) :
35 industries - 3 were spelling errors, corrected
Remove Air Trans (1), Fishery & Forestry (2) industries
–Removed first 128 entries (1997-1999) as they had no data for 2 columns :
Underwriter’s fees & Allocation to BRLM
–New Columns
Minimum bid size
Secondary Offering %age
–Creation of Dummy Variables
BRLMs – 3, on the basis of Gross proceeds of IPO
Industry – 4, binned by average return
Market – whether the IPO was OTC or not
54
*Kaneko and Pettway’s Japanese IPO Database (KP-JIPO)
http://www.fbc.keio.ac.jp/~kaneko/KP-JIPO/top.htm

55
1) Age of company at time of IPO
2) Gross Proceeds (size of IPO)
3) Minimum Bid Amount
4) IS_OTC listing
5) Secondary offering as %age of total
5) Percentage shares allocated to Lead Manager 1
7) Underwriter’s Gross Spread (fees as %age of size of IPO)
8) Industry_Type (binned categorical variable – 4 categories)
9) Lead_Manager (binned categorical variable – 3 categories)
1 Data resolution 5 1.0000
2 Data structure 4 0.7500
3 Data integration no externalities 2 0.2500
5 Generalizability no theory 3 0.5000
6 Chronology of data and goal should be ex ante 3 0.5000
InfoQ Score = 0.66
Prediction algorithms do not give a reasonable prediction of
IPO returns from public information. (High RMSE: 90%)
InfoQ=66%

Thank you for your attention
56

Kenett On Information NYU-Poly 2013

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to Kenett On Information NYU-Poly 2013

Similar to Kenett On Information NYU-Poly 2013 (20)

Kenett On Information NYU-Poly 2013