Jisc Research Data Shared Service
A Samvera case study, Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT
6/5/2018
Why a Shared Service?
There is no single “solution”
easily available and that meets
requirements for Universities to
enable better management of
research data
research data network: http://researchdata.network
web: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/research-data-shared-service
github https://github.com/JiscRDSS
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 2
Jisc national shared research platform
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 3
Information sources
» Publications Router
» Publishers
» Crossref
» ORCID
» DataCite
» PubMed
» Sherpa policy tools
University systems
» (SingleSign-On,
Finance, HR..)
Information
destinations
» Google etc.
» Discovery services
» Jisc CORE
(global OA aggregation)
» Jisc Monitor
(compliance checking)
» JiscCollections
» Funders systems
» OpenAIRE + for EU
Preservation
services
Reports and
dashboards
University X repository
Open Access publications
Research datasets
University Y repository
Open Access publications
Research datasets
University Z repository
Open Access publications
Research datasets
The Challenge
»To meet the sector’s requirements we need
› True multi tenant
› Multi content
› Shared data model
› Interoperable
› Sustainable
› Much improved user
experience
Pilot Alpha MVP
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 5
Samvera users in RDSS
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 6
Demo
Pre-recorded short demo
showing data being uploaded
into a test Samvera repository
instance, with automatic ingest
into Preservica.
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-l1ARNUwWA&t=13s
Stage Gate Review
RDSS Alpha to Beta
»Review by RDSS Steering
Committee on go/no-go to Beta
› Technical Review
› Financial Model – Business
Case
»Review concluded RDSS should
move to beta
Paola Kizette Cimenti -Traffic Light Tree https://www.flickr.com/photos/kizette CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Stage Gate Review
RDSS Alpha to Beta
»Took into account many factors
› Cost ofAlpha to run at scale
› Market Research
› Competitor Analysis
› Indicative pricing
› Jisc Research Strategy goals
»Led to aTechnical Review of
Alpha
Marco Verch -Weight scale https://www.flickr.com CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
In RDSS we found
»That…
› Separate clusters were
needed
› Existing solutions require too
much customisation
»Which leads to…
› A solution that doesn’t scale
nationally
› Economically unsustainable
Canonical Data Model & Message API
»Problems encountered:
› Lack of compatibility between
PCDM and RDSS CDM
› File fixity in the message
payload
› Message implementation
Data Model
https://github.com/JiscRDSS/rdss-canonical-data-model
RDSS Data Model
pre-production phase
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 12
UX tests
Positive outcomes
»Samvera adapter for RDSS (Hyrax 2)
»Messaging developments for RDSS architecture
› Asynchronous operations
› Agnostic messaging
› Automated validation
»IRUS analytics gem – full code refresh
(now Hyrax 2 compatible)
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 14
Samvera community feedback report
https://goo.gl/g2BGkQ
156/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT
open for comment
And discussion!
jisc.ac.uk
Except where otherwise noted, this work
is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND
Thankyou and questions
Dom Fripp
Senior curation metadata developer
Jisc (Digital Futures)
dom.fripp@jisc.ac.uk
6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 16
Twitter: @Domicus
ORCID: 0000-0001-5352-4666

Jisc Research Data Shared Service - a Samvera case study

  • 1.
    Jisc Research DataShared Service A Samvera case study, Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 6/5/2018
  • 2.
    Why a SharedService? There is no single “solution” easily available and that meets requirements for Universities to enable better management of research data research data network: http://researchdata.network web: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/research-data-shared-service github https://github.com/JiscRDSS 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 2
  • 3.
    Jisc national sharedresearch platform 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 3 Information sources » Publications Router » Publishers » Crossref » ORCID » DataCite » PubMed » Sherpa policy tools University systems » (SingleSign-On, Finance, HR..) Information destinations » Google etc. » Discovery services » Jisc CORE (global OA aggregation) » Jisc Monitor (compliance checking) » JiscCollections » Funders systems » OpenAIRE + for EU Preservation services Reports and dashboards University X repository Open Access publications Research datasets University Y repository Open Access publications Research datasets University Z repository Open Access publications Research datasets
  • 4.
    The Challenge »To meetthe sector’s requirements we need › True multi tenant › Multi content › Shared data model › Interoperable › Sustainable › Much improved user experience
  • 5.
    Pilot Alpha MVP 6/5/2018Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 5
  • 6.
    Samvera users inRDSS 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 6
  • 7.
    Demo Pre-recorded short demo showingdata being uploaded into a test Samvera repository instance, with automatic ingest into Preservica. 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-l1ARNUwWA&t=13s
  • 8.
    Stage Gate Review RDSSAlpha to Beta »Review by RDSS Steering Committee on go/no-go to Beta › Technical Review › Financial Model – Business Case »Review concluded RDSS should move to beta Paola Kizette Cimenti -Traffic Light Tree https://www.flickr.com/photos/kizette CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
  • 9.
    Stage Gate Review RDSSAlpha to Beta »Took into account many factors › Cost ofAlpha to run at scale › Market Research › Competitor Analysis › Indicative pricing › Jisc Research Strategy goals »Led to aTechnical Review of Alpha Marco Verch -Weight scale https://www.flickr.com CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
  • 10.
    In RDSS wefound »That… › Separate clusters were needed › Existing solutions require too much customisation »Which leads to… › A solution that doesn’t scale nationally › Economically unsustainable
  • 11.
    Canonical Data Model& Message API »Problems encountered: › Lack of compatibility between PCDM and RDSS CDM › File fixity in the message payload › Message implementation
  • 12.
    Data Model https://github.com/JiscRDSS/rdss-canonical-data-model RDSS DataModel pre-production phase 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 12
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Positive outcomes »Samvera adapterfor RDSS (Hyrax 2) »Messaging developments for RDSS architecture › Asynchronous operations › Agnostic messaging › Automated validation »IRUS analytics gem – full code refresh (now Hyrax 2 compatible) 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 14
  • 15.
    Samvera community feedbackreport https://goo.gl/g2BGkQ 156/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT open for comment And discussion!
  • 16.
    jisc.ac.uk Except where otherwisenoted, this work is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND Thankyou and questions Dom Fripp Senior curation metadata developer Jisc (Digital Futures) dom.fripp@jisc.ac.uk 6/5/2018 Open Repositories 2018, Bozeman, MT 16 Twitter: @Domicus ORCID: 0000-0001-5352-4666