(1) The document discusses the importance of rights in REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) programs in order to ensure their effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. (2) If rights are not adequately addressed, REDD risks worsening rights violations and benefiting only large forest owners. (3) To properly address rights, prior forest tenure reform, procedural safeguards, and enabling policies are necessary steps in REDD.
Healthy ecosystems provide a variety of such critical goods and services. Created by the interactions of living organisms with their environment, these “ecosystem services” provide both the conditions and processes that sustain human life. The awareness of ecosystem services’ importance in human life styles started more than 2500 years ago. Economists have developed different ways to measure the economic value of the nature, all of which required extrapolation or assumptions.
Ignorance, Institutions and Market Failure are the main reasons to the under-protected status of Ecosystem Services. The environment provides critically important services. Some of these are captured by markets, but many are not. They are positive externalities that are therefore regarded by the beneficiaries as free. As a result, many ecosystem services tend to be both under-conserved and undervalued. If beneficiaries had to pay for explicit service provision, however, governments would think differently about their policies and property owners would think very differently about sustainable land management practices. In basic economic terms, payments for ecosystem services (PES) seek to “get the incentives right” by capturing the positive externalities, by providing accurate signals to both service providers and users that reflect the real social benefits that ecosystem services deliver.
Voluntary agreements between buyers and sellers of ecosystem services for cash or other rewards creating markets for ecosystem services which provide incentives and finance to land and resource managers and thereby strengthening conservation and livelihoods are called as PES.
Wide range of potential buyers and sellers are available depending on the ecosystem service. When the market fails to reward on-site ecosystem service providers, or to compensate them for their costs (e.g. changing land use) charge off-site users for the benefits they enjoy (e.g. clean water) PES create a market for natural resources making conservation a more profitable land-use proposition. Information, technical barriers, policy and regulation and institutional barriers are the major challenges in implementing PES.
Creating economic incentives that encourage PES schemes, including environmental taxes and subsidies, transferable discharge permits and environmental labelling, developing specific PES projects with farmers, foresters and/or fisher folks in their region, or their watershed and providing incentives for the private sector to engage in PES schemes are some recommendations for a better PES system.
Payment for Ecosystem Services Pilot Implementation in Mae Sa-Kog Ma Biospher...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 19 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programs in CambodiaCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Legal and Policy Framework for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in ThailandCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by Orapan Nabangchang on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
These slides cover the purposes for ecosystem service valuation (ESV), methods for valuation, examples of valuation studies, and government regulation and program related to ESV.
Multiple financial streams and benefits harnessed and bundledCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Healthy ecosystems provide a variety of such critical goods and services. Created by the interactions of living organisms with their environment, these “ecosystem services” provide both the conditions and processes that sustain human life. The awareness of ecosystem services’ importance in human life styles started more than 2500 years ago. Economists have developed different ways to measure the economic value of the nature, all of which required extrapolation or assumptions.
Ignorance, Institutions and Market Failure are the main reasons to the under-protected status of Ecosystem Services. The environment provides critically important services. Some of these are captured by markets, but many are not. They are positive externalities that are therefore regarded by the beneficiaries as free. As a result, many ecosystem services tend to be both under-conserved and undervalued. If beneficiaries had to pay for explicit service provision, however, governments would think differently about their policies and property owners would think very differently about sustainable land management practices. In basic economic terms, payments for ecosystem services (PES) seek to “get the incentives right” by capturing the positive externalities, by providing accurate signals to both service providers and users that reflect the real social benefits that ecosystem services deliver.
Voluntary agreements between buyers and sellers of ecosystem services for cash or other rewards creating markets for ecosystem services which provide incentives and finance to land and resource managers and thereby strengthening conservation and livelihoods are called as PES.
Wide range of potential buyers and sellers are available depending on the ecosystem service. When the market fails to reward on-site ecosystem service providers, or to compensate them for their costs (e.g. changing land use) charge off-site users for the benefits they enjoy (e.g. clean water) PES create a market for natural resources making conservation a more profitable land-use proposition. Information, technical barriers, policy and regulation and institutional barriers are the major challenges in implementing PES.
Creating economic incentives that encourage PES schemes, including environmental taxes and subsidies, transferable discharge permits and environmental labelling, developing specific PES projects with farmers, foresters and/or fisher folks in their region, or their watershed and providing incentives for the private sector to engage in PES schemes are some recommendations for a better PES system.
Payment for Ecosystem Services Pilot Implementation in Mae Sa-Kog Ma Biospher...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 19 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programs in CambodiaCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
Legal and Policy Framework for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in ThailandCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given by Orapan Nabangchang on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
These slides cover the purposes for ecosystem service valuation (ESV), methods for valuation, examples of valuation studies, and government regulation and program related to ESV.
Multiple financial streams and benefits harnessed and bundledCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was given on the “Regional workshop on Payment for Environmental Services” on November 20 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. The overall aim of the workshop was to enhance the understanding and capacity of policy makers, PES practioners, and researcher communities on the topic of payments for ecosystem services and ecosystem-based approaches and also to increase dialogue between them on latest lessons learned and recommendations for effective, efficient and equitable implementation of PES.
'Presentation Kettunen & ten Brink at Iddri May 07 on the Values of Biodiversity Related Ecosystem Services. Enhancing the integration of biodiversity into policy and decision-making
Presentation by the Foundation for Ecological Security at “Commons tenure for a common future” Discussion Forum on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Benefit sharing from a multilevel governance perspectiveCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered by Anne M Larson, January 2016, in Brussels.
It examines the opportunity, transaction and implementation costs of REDD+ at national and subnational levels, multilevel governance and rights, and assesses perspectives of equity at different levels.
Presentation by Ruth Meinzen-Dick at “Commons Tenure for a Common Future” Discussion Forum on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Investment in the sustainable commons conditions for commons based enterprisesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation by Steven Lawry and Ruth Meinzen-Dick at “GLF Discussion Forum on Commons Tenure for a Common Future” on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Assessing REDD+ Benefit Sharing for Efficiency, Effectiveness and EquityCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Grace Wong, Cecilia Luttrell, Lasse Loft, Anastasia Yang, Maria Brockhaus, Shintia Arwida, Januarti Tjajadi, Pham Thu Thuy and Samuel Assembe-Mvondo at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
Potential for Biodiversity Offsets as a Biodiversity Finance Mechanism in IndiaDivya Narain
Potential for Biodiversity Offsets as a Biodiversity Finance Mechanism in India - a presentation made at the CBD workshop on 'the role of private sector in achieving national biodiversity finance targets' at CII's 10th National Sustainability Summit in New Delhi on Sep. 16th 2015
Looking REDD at landscape level: learning from CBNRM in NepalCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Naya Sharma Paudel and Dil Bahadur Khatri Experiences of CF talks about watershed and landscape level forest management initiatives, REDD/PES piloting at different scale and lessons & insights on institutional aspects.
Public private partnership in forestry managementCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered during the Course on Governance of Landscapes, Forests and People at the CIFOR Campus in Bogor, Indonesia.
It discusses: the reason public-private partnerships became an option; whether or not these partnerships are effective, trade-offs and challenges to consider; and how to ensure the effectiveness public-private partnerships at the landscape level.
Exploring Participatory Prospective Analysis: A collaborative, scenario-based...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, Esther Mwangi, Tuti Herawati and Mani Ram Banjade on 21 March 2017 at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty in Washington, DC.
Legal landscapes in biodiversity and social safeguards: presentationSIANI
Seminar on Landscapes in a Carbon Focused World 26 October 2012
SIANI, Focali & Naturskyddsföreningen organized a one-day seminar in Gothenburg.
Summary: Safeguards have gained momentum in the international environmental arena especially in action for REDD+ under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This presentation will address the way safeguards can be related to different biodiversity financing mechanisms, and learn from the REDD+ discussions under the UNFCCC. While scaling up biodiversity finance is key for achieving the three goals of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the development of new biodiversity financing mechanisms has also generated concerns over the potential problems, which span from generating financial speculation to affecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. The presentation will examine legal landscapes that can be useful for developing and implementing safeguards related to biodiversity financing mechanisms in an equitable way.
Claudia Ituarte-Lima is Legal Advisor at the Resilience and Development Programme (Swedbio), at Stockholm Resilience Centre. She is an international public lawyer with theoretical and applied experience in both multilateral and community environmental issues. She holds a PhD from University College London, an MPhil from University of Cambridge, and diplomas from Bourgogne University in France, among other. Her distinctions include the Human Rights Award by American University, Washington College of Law. Her current interests are climate change and biodiversity laws and policies in relation to poverty alleviation, livelihoods and development. She holds visiting status at the Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford and the Stockholm Environmental Institute.
'Presentation Kettunen & ten Brink at Iddri May 07 on the Values of Biodiversity Related Ecosystem Services. Enhancing the integration of biodiversity into policy and decision-making
Presentation by the Foundation for Ecological Security at “Commons tenure for a common future” Discussion Forum on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Benefit sharing from a multilevel governance perspectiveCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered by Anne M Larson, January 2016, in Brussels.
It examines the opportunity, transaction and implementation costs of REDD+ at national and subnational levels, multilevel governance and rights, and assesses perspectives of equity at different levels.
Presentation by Ruth Meinzen-Dick at “Commons Tenure for a Common Future” Discussion Forum on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Investment in the sustainable commons conditions for commons based enterprisesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation by Steven Lawry and Ruth Meinzen-Dick at “GLF Discussion Forum on Commons Tenure for a Common Future” on the first day of the Global Landscapes Forum 2015, in Paris, France alongside COP21. For more information go to: www.landscapes.org.
Assessing REDD+ Benefit Sharing for Efficiency, Effectiveness and EquityCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Grace Wong, Cecilia Luttrell, Lasse Loft, Anastasia Yang, Maria Brockhaus, Shintia Arwida, Januarti Tjajadi, Pham Thu Thuy and Samuel Assembe-Mvondo at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
Potential for Biodiversity Offsets as a Biodiversity Finance Mechanism in IndiaDivya Narain
Potential for Biodiversity Offsets as a Biodiversity Finance Mechanism in India - a presentation made at the CBD workshop on 'the role of private sector in achieving national biodiversity finance targets' at CII's 10th National Sustainability Summit in New Delhi on Sep. 16th 2015
Looking REDD at landscape level: learning from CBNRM in NepalCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation by Naya Sharma Paudel and Dil Bahadur Khatri Experiences of CF talks about watershed and landscape level forest management initiatives, REDD/PES piloting at different scale and lessons & insights on institutional aspects.
Public private partnership in forestry managementCIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered during the Course on Governance of Landscapes, Forests and People at the CIFOR Campus in Bogor, Indonesia.
It discusses: the reason public-private partnerships became an option; whether or not these partnerships are effective, trade-offs and challenges to consider; and how to ensure the effectiveness public-private partnerships at the landscape level.
Exploring Participatory Prospective Analysis: A collaborative, scenario-based...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti, Esther Mwangi, Tuti Herawati and Mani Ram Banjade on 21 March 2017 at the World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty in Washington, DC.
Legal landscapes in biodiversity and social safeguards: presentationSIANI
Seminar on Landscapes in a Carbon Focused World 26 October 2012
SIANI, Focali & Naturskyddsföreningen organized a one-day seminar in Gothenburg.
Summary: Safeguards have gained momentum in the international environmental arena especially in action for REDD+ under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This presentation will address the way safeguards can be related to different biodiversity financing mechanisms, and learn from the REDD+ discussions under the UNFCCC. While scaling up biodiversity finance is key for achieving the three goals of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the development of new biodiversity financing mechanisms has also generated concerns over the potential problems, which span from generating financial speculation to affecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. The presentation will examine legal landscapes that can be useful for developing and implementing safeguards related to biodiversity financing mechanisms in an equitable way.
Claudia Ituarte-Lima is Legal Advisor at the Resilience and Development Programme (Swedbio), at Stockholm Resilience Centre. She is an international public lawyer with theoretical and applied experience in both multilateral and community environmental issues. She holds a PhD from University College London, an MPhil from University of Cambridge, and diplomas from Bourgogne University in France, among other. Her distinctions include the Human Rights Award by American University, Washington College of Law. Her current interests are climate change and biodiversity laws and policies in relation to poverty alleviation, livelihoods and development. She holds visiting status at the Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford and the Stockholm Environmental Institute.
Linking REDD+ and ape conservation in Africa: opportunities and constraintsCIFOR-ICRAF
CIFOR scientist Terry Sunderland discusses the many opportunities and constraints inherent in attempting to harness REDD+ projects for great ape conservation in Africa. He gave this presentation at the ‘Linking Great Ape Conservation with Poverty Alleviation’ workshop hosted by CIFOR in January 2012.
Presentation by Florence Bernard and Slayde Hawkins.
PES may be prohibited by Constitution or law. This presentation discusses how policy may affect the implementation of PES and REDD projects.
Equity workshop: Equity, justice & well-being in ecosystem governance in MexicoIIED
A presentation by Juan Carlos Carrillo, Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental A.C.E
This presentation was given at the Expert Workshop on Equity, Justice and Well-being in Ecosystem Governance, held at the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) in London, March, 2015.
Keynote presentation by Ana Maria Loboguerrero Rodriguez, CCAFS and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
International conference on agricultural emissions and food security: Connecting research to policy and practice
10-13 September 2018
Berlin, Germany
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forwardCIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation by Christopher Martius on April 5, 2019 at Workshop in Ethiopia ("Forests and climate change: research results and implications for REDD+ and forest governance in Ethiopia")
Issues involved in enforcement of environmental legislationAmandaBvera
This presentation talks about the various issues involved in environmental legislation. It talks about the drawbacks of the major environmental acts introduced and it also explains some of the remedial measures taken to rectify the drawbacks mentioned. It is useful for studying, and contain fun activities for teachers to use while teaching.
This presentation is a compilation of four that were given on 30 November 2011 at an official UNFCCC COP17 side-event organised by CIFOR: 'How is REDD+ unfolding on the ground?'. The event discussed early insights on the capability of REDD+ projects to deliver on their goal of sequestering forest carbon while providing a range of co-benefits. The information presented draws mainly on findings of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+, and covers the status and challenges of REDD+ projects on the ground;
challenges encountered in establishing REDD+ in Africa;
the policy and economic context in which REDD+ projects is unfolding; and
the status of monitoring, reporting and verification in setting up REDD+.
CIFOR and Global Comparative Study on REDD+CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the Knowledge Sharing Event "Sharing Insights Across REDD+ Countries" in Georgetown, Guyana, on June 6, 2017.
Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) of REDD+ strategy, NepalIIED
The presentation of Barry Dalal-Clayton, senior fellow of IIED, to the IIED-hosted Moving ahead with Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) workshop on 9-10 April 2014.
The presentation, made during the fifth session on social and environmental safeguards of REDD+, focused on Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) and safeguards, using issues and lessons from IIED's work in Nepal.
Read more on Dalal-Clayton's work: http://www.iied.org/users/barry-dalal-clayton.
Further details of the workshop and IIED's work on REDD+ are available via http://www.iied.org/coverage-moving-ahead-redd-prospects-challenges-workshop.
Key baseline findings for USAID's Community-Based Forest Management Program (CFP) impact evaluation in Zambia. Presented at the American Evaluation Association's Evaluation 2015 Conference. Credit:
- Heather Huntington, PhD, The Cloudburst Group
- M. Mercedes Stickler, USAID
- Stephanie Fenner, The Cloudburst Group
- Aleta Haflett, The Cloudburst Group
Learn more: http://bit.ly/TCGcbfp
Similar to Issues of effectiveness, efficiency and equity in REDD implementation (20)
Direitos das Mulheres à Terra e aos Recursos Florestaisrightsandclimate
An overview of the situation women face in Brazil with regards to their rights to natural resources by Noemi Miyasaki Porro, Universidade Federal do Para (UFPA). Presented at an RRI-CAPRi workshop at the 2009 World Social Forum in Belem, Brazil.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
Issues of effectiveness, efficiency and equity in REDD implementation
1. Rights: An essential
precondition for effectiveness,
efficiency and equity in REDD
by William D. Sunderlin, Arild Angelsen
and Timmons Roberts
“Rights, Forests and Climate Change”
A joint conference convened by Rights and Resources Initiative & Rainforest Foundation Norway
Oslo, Norway, 15-17 October 2008
2. Structure of presentation
• Definition of terms
• Rights, forests, REDD and justice
• Consequences if no rights in REDD
• Problems, even with attention to rights in REDD
• How attention to rights assures effectiveness,
efficiency, and equity in REDD
• Necessary steps for adequate attention to rights
in REDD
• Summary and closing thoughts
3. Definition of terms
• Rights = tenure over land, trees, carbon, but also broader
range of rights
• REDD =
At the global level
Readiness funds (capacity building)
An incentive mechanism (implementation of pay the polluter
principle) in a possible Copenhagen protocol
In national strategies:
Implement similar incentive mechanisms through performance-
based pay to forest owners/users/managers
Tenure and governance reforms
Extra-sectoral policies
4. Definition of terms
• Effectiveness = to what extent REDD
reduces GHGs
• Efficiency = to what extent REDD
achieves goal at minimum cost
• Equity = to what extent REDD achieves
fair distribution of cost and benefits in the
program
5. Rights, forests, REDD and justice
• Few people in forests have statutory rights of ownership
or access
• Long history of exclusion only recently beginning to head
in a good direction
• Reasons for recognizing rights in forests predates REDD
• REDD threatens to worsen rights violations if rights not
given adequate attention in REDD
• Conversely REDD can greatly assist fulfillment of rights if
given adequate attention
• Rights in REDD should be seen not just as a means for
effectiveness, efficiency, and equity within REDD, but as
an end for attaining broader social justice goals
6. Consequences if no rights in REDD
(1) Contracts and benefits will go to the relatively
few and large forest owners causing:
• Increasing inequality, resentment, and conflict in
forest population (inequity), especially if large
amounts of REDD funds attract powerful elites
• Reduced effectiveness and efficiency of REDD
because of sub-optimal area of coverage
• Possibility of retaliatory sabotage by those left out,
further reducing effectiveness and efficiency
7. Consequences if no rights in REDD
(2) Government will resort to renewed and
increased state control to compensate for low area
coverage, which will cause or aggravate:
• Anti-people, “guns and fences,” exclusionary models
of forest conservation
• Possibility of evictions of people from forests they
depend on for livelihoods
• Increased violation of tenure and other rights
• Possibility of retaliation by those whose rights and
livelihoods are trodden upon, reducing effectiveness
and efficiency further still
8. Consequences if no rights in REDD
(3) Aggravates the effects of moral hazard (rewards
to deforesters and none to forest conservers) by
restricting rewards to worst deforesters:
• For example, with no prior forest tenure reform,
REDD benefits would go mainly to cattle ranchers in
Central America, who are more likely to have land
rights and to be worst deforesters
• This leads to cynicism, lack of identification with
national forest conservation strategies, sabotage of
REDD efforts, and further undermining of
effectiveness and efficiency.
9. Problems, even with attention to rights in
REDD
We recognize that expanding tenure rights can
create new problems, e.g.:
• Forest ownership as a precondition for REDD
participation creating a land race
• New forest ownership leading to land sell-off
• Privileging of individual forest tenure over
communal tenure to overcome free rider
problems
But these are probably surmountable problems.
10. How attention to rights assures effectiveness,
efficiency, equity in REDD
Attention to tenure and other rights avoids most
negative outcomes described above by:
• Helping to rectify a historic injustice
• Maximizing the number of REDD beneficiaries
and area of coverage
• Potentially aiming toward reducing inequalities
• Creating a sense of belonging and identification
with the goals of REDD
• Potentially creating incentives for long-term
forest custodianship
12. Necessary steps for adequate attention to
rights in REDD
(1) Prior forest tenure reform on a large scale through:
• State recognition of customary land claims of
indigenous peoples and collective titling
• State recognition and extension of ownership rights and
not mere access rights
• Enforcement of existing ownership rights because they
frequently do not assure ability to exclude outside
claimants, among other problems
• Clarification and extension of community rights not just
to land and forest resources, but also to carbon, and
also to the full panoply of rights (e.g. human rights,
citizenship, civil rights, gender)
13. Necessary steps for adequate attention to
rights in REDD
(2) Procedural priorities in forest reform:
• Full information to, and consultation with forest peoples in
design and implementation of REDD
• Up front financing and long timetable, perhaps through
trust fund for REDD/property rights through UNFCCC
• Assistance in technical and legal matters
14. Necessary steps for adequate attention to
rights in REDD
(3) Enabling context necessary because attention to
rights alone is insufficient:
• Good governance, anti-corruption measures, and
oversight of carbon value chain to prevent funds diversion
• Improvement of government capacity
• Regulatory reform to remove anti-poor laws
• Support small and medium enterprises
• Rationalize forest policy: dominance of REDD or agrofuels
objectives?
• Link REDD to national development policy
15. Necessary steps for adequate attention to
rights in REDD
(4) Take extra-sectoral logic on board in REDD:
• Many underlying causes of deforestation and degradation
reside in society at large and not at forest site, so makes
no sense to focus only on local level incentives. (Example:
Biofuels expansion nullifying ability of local owners to
exclude counter-claimants)
• By same token, most causes of forest restoration to date
have little to do with conscious policy steps, so REDD
policies must take these society-wide forces into account.
(Example: If urban employment reduces forest pressures,
expand these opportunities.)
17. Summary and conclusion
• There are clear instrumental (means →
end) reasons for giving strong attention to
rights in REDD: It’s a precondition for at
least partial fulfillment of effectiveness,
efficiency and equity goals
• There are also clear ethical (end in itself)
reasons for giving strong attention to rights
in REDD: It may be a key step for
rectifying a historic wrong
18. Summary and conclusion
Necessary steps for appropriate
implementation of REDD include:
• Prior forest tenure reform on a large
scale
• Observance of procedural priorities that
fully involve and support forest peoples
• Creation of an enabling policy framework
• Take extra-sectoral logic on board in
REDD
19. Closing thoughts
• Strong representation of forest people is
necessary in the planning,
implementation, and monitoring of REDD
to narrow the gap between an
instrumental approach in REDD (mere
fulfillment of effectiveness, efficiency,
equity) and the broader social justice
aspirations of forest peoples
20. Closing thoughts
• If conditionality is not possible or
desirable, then the only option to motivate
governments to give adequate attention to
rights is to convince them of the need for
attention to rights as an essential
precondition for successful REDD
performance.
21. Thank you
William D. Sunderlin - Senior Researcher, Rights and Resources Initiative
Arild Angelsen - Professor, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)
Timmons Roberts - Professor, College of William and Mary